Race realism within a Catholic context

The Confusion of Tongues, (Tower of Babel). The people, distraught in front of the Tower of Babel, as God confuses human language and scatters them. ‘Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech. So the Lord scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.’ (Genesis 11:7-9). Drawn by Gustave Doré, French artist, b January 6, 1832 – January 23, 1883. Engraver unsure. (Photo by Culture Club/Getty Images)

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Sept. 6, 2021 Anno Domini

Race denialists like Eugene Michael Jones of Culture Wars magazine would have you believe that race is only skin deep and people can change nationalities and cultures like they change underwear.

If he weren’t making these statements from a Catholic podium, one would think we were hearing yet another piece of Cultural Marxist flavour-of-the-week talking points from any number of the ruling elite’s parrots in the media. But that isn’t so. And, unfortunately, Jones is not the only so called Catholic with this opinion. Many, traditional and modern, Catholics share this opinion, likely due to decades of anti-racist brainwashing and distorted teachings from the pulpit.

So, what is the truth on the matter of race? Is it compatible with Catholic teaching or is it just bigotry? Is biological determinism (or some similar form of it) true, or is race just the colour of your skin which covers a completely blank body, mind, and soul with no genetic predispositions? I believe the answer is quite simple. Without the intervention of God, via the Holy Ghost, cultures/races/nations are predisposed to the immoral inclinations of their genetics and/or ingrained cultural beliefs. I guess you could say that biological determinism does exist, but if one converts to the true faith in Jesus Christ, the Holy Ghost guides the person away from the bad inclinations of their genetic determinism and harnesses the good aspects of it. Evidence of this is demonstrated by the changes in followers of Christ who repent from their sins—sins being the inclination of their genetic determinism inherited from Adam passed down (is not original sin a kind of genetic determinism?). However, When a person repents from sin, they don’t change entirely. They still maintain aspects of their personality and behaviour before they repented. They still retain their unique character and the moral or neutral attributes of their genetic inclinations.

Throughout the Bible and the teachings of St. Thomas Aquinas, nationalism is upheld as moral and virtuous. The Bible in no way promotes any inkling of multi-ethnic societies. The idea of Catholicism being universal relates to the application of salvation (to everyone, or universal). Many twist this into meaning some kind of “Holy” melting pot mechanism.

“The righteous exalteth a nation.” (Ecclesiasticus)

Indeed, the nation is a larger version of the family, which was instituted by God himself. The family is spiritually and racially cohesive, ideally. The propagation of nationhood and even ingroup cohesion is largely found in books of the Bible like Ecclesiasticus and Proverbs. For example, in Ecclesiasticus Chapter 13:14-19, it states,

“Love the Lord all thy life, and cull upon Him for they salvation. Every beast loveth his like, and every man loveth his neighbour. All flesh consorteth according to kind, and a man will cleave to his like. What fellowship hath the wolf with the lamb? So the sinner with the godly. What agreement is there between the hyena and a dog? And what peace between the rich and the poor. As the wild ass is the lion’s prey in the wilderness: so the rich eat up the poor.” (Ecclesiasticus)

If race and nations are extensions or amplifications of the family, then wouldn’t the inverse of racial polygamy (race mixing) be marital polygamy? Is it just a coincidence that the multi-ethnic superstate under Nimrod was destroyed by God, as it tended towards tyrannical rule in opposition to God?

Aristotle wrote,

“Heterogeneity of stocks may lead to faction – at any rate until they have had time to assimilate. A city cannot be constituted from any chance collection of people, or in any chance period of time. Most of the cities which have admitted settlers, either at the time of their foundation or later, have been troubled by faction.”

So as God brought wrath upon Shinar for its multi-ethnic, one worldism, so now He brings wrath upon the world, which is pursuing the very same ill-fated goal of a one world (communistic) order via the mixing of the races and the feeding of immoral traits of genetic determinism, especially among the Third World, Islamists, and Jews. Aristotle goes on to explain the relationship between multi-culturalism and tyrannical world rule:

The guard of a [legitimate] king is composed of citizens: that of a tyrant is composed of foreigners….

It is a habit of tyrants never to like anyone who has a spirit of dignity and independence. The tyrant claims a monopoly of such qualities for himself; he feels that anybody who asserts a rival dignity, or acts with independence, is threatening his own superiority and the despotic power of his tyranny; he hates him accordingly as a subverter of his own authority. It is also a habit of tyrants to prefer the company of aliens to that of citizens at table and in society; citizens, they feel, are enemies, but aliens will offer no opposition.” (1313B29)

Aristotle’s warning happened exactly as he said it would would in the case of the Satanic Soviet Union, whose domination was by that of foreigners, namely Jews. And now this same tribe exercises this same script all over the world to bring about the same end.

…what Tyranny in essence was: an autocracy based on military force supplied by a personal bodyguard and mercenaries; and reinforced by multiple dynastic marriages, the unscrupulous transfers of populations, and the enfranchisement of foreigners.

Before Saint Thomas Aquinas warned of granting immediate citizenship to foreigners, Saint Isidore of Seville warned of a cabal of foreign Jews conspiring against their new (Christian) citizens:

“We have recently and undoubtedly discovered from clear confessions that those Hebrews from the regions beyond the sea call on the other Hebrews to act together against Christianity … among their other crimes [the Jews] had not only chosen to throw the order of the Church into confusion but also attempted to ruin the fatherland and the whole people in tyrannical conspiracy in such a way that they are already celebrating their own era and committing various massacres of Christians.” —Canon 8, Toledo Council XVII

When Eugene Michael Jones claims that race is inconsequential to the Christian, he is telling a half truth. Race is inconsequential to repentance and the resultant salvation of Jesus Christ, but genetic determinism still exists in the believer to some degree and especially thrives in the non-believer. This determinism affects the person and those around him. Therefore, non-believing foreigners should be treated very cautiously and should never be allowed to make up or influence the dominant culture or, as Aristotle warns, that society will end up in a tyranny. And we today see this effect happening before our very eyes in the West. As for believing foreigners, the same Aristotelian advice would apply. Foreigners are to be treated with charity but are not to be allowed to dominate, disrupt, or influence the culture. Furthermore, a Christian foreigner’s moral or, at least, neutral genetic traits can still negatively affect those of his adopted nation, based on ingroup-outgroup dynamics (see works of Professor Kevin MacDonald for more on this, especially his magnum opus Culture of Critique). Therefore, segregation of even Christian foreigners seems prudent to the overall health of a nation. The so-called racism of the Israeli state, instead of being something to abhor, is something that the Western world used to uphold in the West and should re-adopt it now. Perhaps, then, we would provide a stronger counter to the Jewish offensive against the Christian world.

Part 2 will examine the belief that the true descendants of the house of Israel are European-derived peoples.

10 comments

  1. I don’t know that racism in the negative sense is a good thing ever. Foreigners to any country, regardless of race, should be tested/investigated and definitely not be allowed to disrupt their new nation. The natural inclination of all races is to be most comfortable with those of the same race or environmental upbringing and there’s nothing wrong with that, it’s better and is the source of a stable and cohesive society which then can produce a unique culture of real value. What the jews/cjews and their tools want is to artificially mix races as a strategy for domination, that’s obvious for a long time. The flooding of immigrants by the jewish mafia into almost exclusively western nations is telling too. Is there a cry for europeans to invade Africa? or China? or any other place that has overwhelmingly one apparent ethnicity? Nope. There’s no organized effort to offer immigrants any sort of special privileges in countries like those. There’s no free money, housing, driving, food etc in those and similar countries. Pretty much all of which are offered in europe and somewhat in the USA to immigrants, legal or illegal. There is also the jew bankster megacorporate strategy of work visas to lower wages and at the same time bring over higher educated loyal servants to their god-state.

    The jewish mafia certainly isn’t pushing for european descendents to go to single ethnicity countries through their various tools around the world. So it’s status as a political tool with a definite target is obvious, and hypocritical as usual. Most of those who choose to have a partner of different race are usually very much outliers themselves, and usually not in any good way. The jewish mafia has known for a long time that european peoples, especially catholics, are their greatest barrier to a slave state of ignorant fools who love their slavery. So that’s who they are targeting, at the same time they have their crypto army who visibly is white european(in white euro countries that is) descent but is carrying out the plan of satan and their antichrist messiah. Normal people have no clue about this, especially since the smashing of Christian unity 500 years ago and the infiltration and subversion of the Church with Vatican II. Working both inside and outside to confuse and pervert all aspects of the real Catholic Church.

    Even so called educated Catholics are really terribly confused or cryptos or just support this madness. Another example is Gabriele Kuby in her otherwise great book “Global Sexual Revolution”. She quotes EMJ a lot which is telling to either her mental capacities or her collaboration. She uses perverted translations of the Bible(Gen 2:23) for her own purposes as to the relationship between man and woman. Therefore elsewhere she perverts and makes conclusions based on that, which are not really Catholic at all, they would be Vatican II though. She cannot read between the lines of JP2’s “Theology of the Body” garbage, which the sexual act is made into some sort of sacrament, sex magic, this is satanic. Even the jew infiltrator Randy Engels can see through this. I can’t help but think of Arriaga’s amazing book “New Montinian Church” and his masterful decoding of jewish dialectics used by Paul VI. Kuby at the same time does some really great work, but it’s so muddled with almost an equal amount of ambiguous garbage as to be almost worthless other than bare facts from outside references. Another example is the constant affirmation that God is love, I understand the sentiment but that’s just abuse of language. God is a separate being, the Holy Trinity, and is not some ambiguous concept that could be and is used for all sorts of nonsense. God is outside of space and time in eternity but is also everywhere continuously supporting existence.

    Protestants and many Catholics use the translation Faith, Hope and LOVE. This is abuse of language. It’s been Faith Hope and CHARITY from the beginning. Love is just a lost word that people use to mean many things. She also seems to be a big fan or references a lot of these “human rights” declarations of various times, so she is legitimizing these anti-catholic, anti-christ declarations of error just be quoting them and inferring their authority. There is almost no mention of all the catechisms of the PRE- Vatican II church anywhere in the book, they don’t fit her inclinations or liking apparently. Or she is not a serious Catholic at all. ALL “catholic” references are either cherrypicked from the Fathers or exclusively Vatican II figures/documents. Democracy, a stop on the way to socialism and full communism is sacrosinct, regardless of it’s fantasy based tenents. This author clearly would be on board with many other aspects of the satanic antichristian plan now taking place on the largest scale ever seen. She also pushes Paul VI encyclical on sexuality with cherrypicked quotes there, anything from that devil is laced with double meanings and ambiguity as per Arriaga’s masterful book. She is obviously clueless as to the jewish kabbalistic dialectical method in language and with cryptos working inside in collaboration with their obvious outside brethren. Vatican II Popes pontificate so called traditional values but they do nothing real or authoritative when their directives are flaunted, this points to a clear strategy of subversion which seems beyond Kuby.

  2. Numbers 36:6-9

    “Let them marry to whom they will, only so that it be to men of their own tribe. Lest the possession of the children of Israel be mingled from tribe to tribe. For all men shall marry wives of their own tribe and kindred: And all women shall take husbands of the same tribe: that the inheritance may remain in the families, And that the tribes be not mingled one with another, but remain so.”

    http://www.drbo.org/cgi-bin/d?b=drb&bk=4&ch=36&l=7#x

  3. Deuteronomy 17:14-15

    “And whenever you should enter into the land which the lord your God gives to you by lot, and you should inherit it, and should dwell upon it, and you should say, I shall place over myself a ruler, as also the rest of the nations round about me;

    Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the Lord thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee:

    –>>> thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother.”

  4. Being a “jew” is a religion, not a race. Why do you think they have all hair and eye colors? The fact is everyone one on earth is related to the Jews of the OT. A family tree going back 2000 years would have 100s of millions of names in it. You people are idiots.

    1. What’s idiotic is your comment. You don’t understand that it’s the Jews who boast of their race and religion, not just religion!

  5. Weimar Germany to Weimar UK: the Britain we once knew no longer exists
    ‘This isn’t the Britain we fought for,’ say the ‘unknown warriors’ of WWII.
    They despise what has become of the Britain they once fought to save. It’s not our country any more, they say, in sorrow and anger. Sarah harks back to the days when ‘people kept the laws and were polite and courteous. We didn’t have much money, but we were contented and happy. ‘People whistled and sang. There was still the United Kingdom, our country, which we had fought for, our freedom, democracy. But where is it now?!’
    ‘I sing no song for the once-proud country that spawned me,’ wrote a sailor who fought the Japanese in the Far East, ‘and I wonder why I ever tried.’
    ‘My patriotism has gone out of the window,’ said another ex-serviceman.
    ‘Those comrades of mine who never made it back would be appalled if they could see the world as it is today.
    ‘They would wonder what happened to the Brave New World they fought so damned hard for.’
    ‘People come here, get everything they ask, for free, laughing at our expense,’ was a typical observation.
    ‘We old people struggle on pensions, not knowing how to make ends meet. If I had my time again, would we fight as before? Need you ask?’
    Many writers are bewildered and overwhelmed by a multicultural Britain that, they say bitterly, they were never consulted about nor feel comfortable with.
    ‘Our country has been given away to foreigners while we, the generation who fought for freedom, are having to sell our homes for care and are being refused medical services because incomers come first.’
    https://justice4germans.wordpress.com/2012/10/14/weimar-germany-to-weimar-uk-the-britain-we-once-knew-no-longer-exists/

    1. How Jewish Elites Use Non-White Immigration to Undermine Western Nations
      The Hart Celler Act — United States 1965
      The Migration Act — Australia 1966
      The British Nationality Act — United Kingdom 1981
      Ralph Miliband was born in the jewish quarter of Warsaw. He emigrated to England in 1940.
      After the war he joined the Labour Party, despite his hatred for English culture, and proceeded to become an intellectual proponent of the New Left. His writings and lectures proved influential in the reworking of several British Nationality Acts over the decades, as they became increasingly more open to non-White immigration.
      https://www.sgtreport.com/2019/03/how-jewish-elites-use-non-white-immigration-to-undermine-western-nations-video/

  6. Hail Mary!Viva Cristo Rei!

    I’m predominantely white (castizo/harnizo?), paternal grandfather white and maternal grandmother white, the others mixed.

    What advice would you give to a mixed-race catholic couple/family?I think that “bleaching” if doing right can work, see Alexandre Dumas future generations (i know he was a liberal and romantic freemason, only showing a example). In other race-mixings (non-white with other non-white) can be done something similar, returning to one of the original races of the ancestors.

    Also what about Our Lady of Guadalupe?I saw the FSB-shill E Michael Jones distorting the meaning of the apparition, as if the holy mother was going to support mass immigration and destruction of the white race, which I see as something in the context of the Spanish Empire, and not in the European part of it which remained Catholic and WHITE!Also i confess that I was tormented by bad thoughts of apostasy because of these issues, but thank God despite my sins I am still in the true faith. It’s not her fault that this bastard distorts her meaning.

    A seminarian friend of mine once told me about this, that it would be the solution for my country, he called it the “gnosis” (jokingly) of the catholic apartheid: Separating the races geographically while converting everyone to the catholic faith. There could still be social interactions but not marriages or sexual relations, the problem I see is in the case of families that are already mixed.

    Even in our sedevacantist background, although the majority is aware of the Jewish issue regarding the racial issue we only have a few who knows. It’s tiresome.

    And in charity i must say, about another subject: It’s not Our Lady fault that pro-russian shills are using Fatima as a cope for defending eurasianism, since she said that “Russia will spread his errors around the world”. Don’t lower yourself to the level of “vetero”-Catholics and the schizophrenic gang (((Richard Ibranyi)))

    And I’m honest: You have excellent content against the Eurasian/Duginist Zog, i’m even planning to translate some articles, but you end up coping about atlanticism, I hope you’re not on the payroll of the CIA and FBI.

Leave a Reply to Paul A DangCancel reply