How to detect controlled opposition

“We shall set up our own opposition. Our real opponents, at heart, will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards…. Our subjects will be convinced of the existence of full freedom fo speech.”

—Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion 12:11 (Late 19th century)

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 3, 2021 Anno Domini

All controlled opposition are shills but not all shills are controlled opposition.

Everyone shills for their worldview to one degree or another. In general, there is nothing wrong with this. We see our worldview as the best and naturally want the rest of the world to adopt it in order to make the world a better place.

Of course, our worldview might not be what’s best for everyone, but we believe it is. This type of shilling is honest and natural, so long as the one shilling their worldview is transparent about. But what about all those shills who keep their worldview secret from others yet continue to shill for it? This is when shilling becomes highly suspect. After all, why would someone want to keep their worldview a secret from others?

Someone may have honest reasons for secrecy, especially with increasing public censorship of unpopular opinions. This is totally understandable. However, this covert kind of shilling can be exploited to install controlled opposition operatives as part of counter-intelligence operations of foreign and/or hostile groups. Therefore, it becomes necessary to be able to detect these dangerous shills so as to be able to neutralize their shilling and, hopefully, expose their true motive to the public.

The following are a list of tools you can use to hopefully detect and neutralize controlled opposition shills.

Patterns: the primary method to detect controlled opposition shills is in the patterns they exhibit or exist in their lives. No matter how clever controlled opposition is, they will always exhibit one or more patterns. It’s our job to recognize these patterns. We want to look for patterns in their narratives—which ones they promote and which ones they ignore. We want to look for patterns in the guests they use to advance their shilling message. We also want to look for patterns in the suspected shills’ associates. As the saying goes, “those of a feather, flock together” (Note: finding only scant patterns without other corroborating patterns doesn’t necessarily make one controlled opposition, so be cautious. Above all, be objective.)

Background: we want to look for patterns in the suspected controlled opposition operative’s history. This isn’t always possible, especially if they are a mysterious and secretive character, but when it is possible, dig deep in their history and look for patterns in their education, family, associates, employment, religion, etc. It shouldn’t be difficult to find patterns in a dangerous shill’s background. If the suspect has even remote connections to the intelligence world, big business, lobbyists, we should narrow in even deeper looking for patterns. Finally, the suspect’s birth could also help corroborate other patterns. For example, of the suspect is born Jewish, a red flag should go up in your mind (being Jewish alone without corroborating patterns is not indicative of controlled opposition. You need to keep digging or dismiss the subject as controlled opposition.)

Popularity: A popular character is not necessarily a shill, but it is a strong indicator when discovered alongside other patterns of shillery. The more popular a character, the greater chance there is of controlled opposition. After all, in this anti-Christ system of deception, the devils appearing as angels of light are made stars and given riches and success as a reward for their treason against God and His creation. In contrast, truth tellers are typically marginalized and censored, as were the Hebrew prophets like Jeremiah and Isaiah who condemned the Jews for their self-worship an worship of idols. On that note, being censored, alone, does not clear anyone of suspicion of controlled opposition; so tread softly around this pattern. Many mistakenly believe that censorship connotes legitimacy. If someone is censored yet there are one or more patterns of controlled opposition, that censorship is designed to further mask their true agenda. In other words, the censorship itself is controlled opposition involving controlled opposition! Don’t sweat it, though. It might seem complex at first, but once you begin practicing looking for patterns, it gets easier.

Medium: This is related to popularity. If the suspected shill has easy and much access to mediums of communication, they should be held as suspect, especially today, where the thought police work around the clock trying to restrict access of truth tellers. Is the suspected shill being promoted on multiple mediums by multiple sources? This is highly suspect and should be scrutinized. One method the Judeo-masonic money power uses to neutralize truth speech is through what’s called dynamic silence. Developed by “Rabbi” Feinberg of the American Jewish Committee in 1947, with dynamic silence, according to a scrubbed Wikipedia entry, “unfavoured individuals are denied unmediated exposure to the public. In the second part, only negative aspects of the unfavoured individuals are reported.” A related method used to silence truth tellers is through enemy groups publicly criticizing their own controlled opposition (seemingly paradoxical) so as the criticized shill gets negative attention as opposed to an authentic opponent getting any attention at all. For example, when the ADL or Hillary Clinton publically named Alex Jones instead of critics who had authentic dirt on them. It’s a diversion tactic. If Jones were authentic, they would not name him at all, even if critically, because the Streissand Effect says that even negative attention will bring out the message of the one being criticized. Therefore, it’s best to completely ignore truth tellers, because criticizing them publicly will only give them more attention (to their message). So, if a suspected shill is being publicly criticized by high-profile groups, that is a major red flag. Look for corroborating patterns.

These were the methods I used to successfully call out Alex Jones in the mid 2000s. I didn’t read about it anywhere, I just had a natural aptitude for it. Unfortunately, at the time I discovered the patterns in Alex Jones and tried to warn others about it, nobody would believe me. I was using logical arguments in an attempt to show them, and it wasn’t changing anyone’s mind (so I thought. Later, several contacted me saying that I had helped them wake up to the Alex Jones deception). So, I decided that in order to convince people, I was going to have to come up with some hard data to show them that Jones was working for the bad guys. So, what I did was a key word count analysis of his video documentaries, like this one. This seemed to have more of an effect, and eventually forums and blogs were reposting the data I had collected on Jones and my thesis was starting to seem plausible to more and more people. At that time, I didn’t know about things like the Soviet Trust model, so I wasn’t very confident in my skepticism of people likes Jones, but I just knew something was fishy about him, based on the patterns I had recognized. Eventually, though, it paid off, and I feel corroborated by the passage of time and the acquisition of knowledge. Now you have the tools and the knowledge that took me years to develop.

God speed!


  1. Main stream also shills by omission, by not revealing for example the Bromberg Massacres in the Sudetenland in Poland in 1939 of ethnic Germans,The to become Allies framed Germany as aggressively invading Poland , Agent Provocateurs in Poland perpetrated and agitated to initiate the atrocity.These omissions can have far reaching consequences as subsequently occurred.An example of recent omission below:
    Haaretz Newspaper: Jewish Radicals Burn 53 Churches & Mosques.
    And the far reaching omission of round table alternative view discussion regarding the Covid 19 virus that has never been isolated , the deleterious mask wearing, distancing and lockdowns that have no role in the control of a pandemic even if there
    were one.Discussion which we always took for granted(free speech) being replaced with an alternative view being labelled hate speech, this is being achieved by repetition of falsehoods,lies and fear inducement i.e. Bully Tactics.

    The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion , spell it all out and everyone should read them, Nesta Webster,Henry Ford,Douglas Reed ,Eustace Mullins Louis Marschalko and General Cherep -Spiridovich all refer to their undeniable accuracy and predictivity.

    Who and what is in a position to overthrow an invisible force?
    And this is precisely what our force is. Gentile masonry, blindly
    serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of
    our force, even its very abiding-place, remains for the whole people
    an unknown mystery.

    The masons controlling key positions of power in the Police, Govt. local Govt, health services had better check what their ultimate fate will be, when they overturned Russia, once they usefulness was spent they too were sent to Siberia to the Road of Bones, digging in Gold mines till drop down dead.

    Protocol number 15.

    The lodges will have their representatives who will serve to screen the above-mentioned administration of MASONRY and from whom will issue the watchword and program.
    AMONG THE MEMBERS OF THESE LODGES WILL BE ALMOST ALL THE AGENTS OF INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL POLICE since their service is for us irreplaceable in the respect that the police is in a position not only to use its own particular measures with the insubordinate, but also to screen our activities and provide
    pretexts for discontentsThe GOYIM enter the lodges out of curiosity or in the hope by their means to get a nibble at the public pie, and some of them in order to obtain a hearing before the public for their impracticable and groundless fantasies: they thirst for the emotion of success and applause, of which we are remarkably generous.
    By such methods we have plucked out of the midst of MASONRY the very root of
    protest against our disposition. While preaching liberalism to the GOY we at the same
    time keep our own people and our agents in a state of unquestioning submission.

  2. With World War 2 I am surprised so many people – even those who claim to be “anti communist” or “conservative” – take communist propaganda at face value. Especially in regards to the Soviet-Nazi war. Stalin was preparing to invade Germany in 1941 with the code name Operation Thunderstorm (Operatsia Groza). Hitler was aware of this and struck first with Operation Barbarossa. The evidence for this is all there in the link below. It is a long thread but very interesting. It’s not a question of being pro Hitler or anti Hitler. It is a question of understanding what the communists were up to. Most people think the war for the Soviet Union started in June 1941 yet they were in it from the start when the USSR invaded Poland on September 17 1939. They also invaded Finland in that year and Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania in 1940. Even after the Soviet-Nazi war broke out the USSR invaded Iran in August 1941. And yet most people believe the Soviet Union was “neutral” or “peaceful” until the Nazi attack. This lie is repeated ad nauseum by Hollywood and the MSM – they are reading from a communist script. Stalin broke the non aggression pact with Poland in 1939 so why wouldn’t he break the non aggression pact with Germany in 1941?

    1. I’m surprised how many people take Jewish propaganda re World War 2 at face value. Certainly since 1913 Jews acted as a set of secret groups around the world, pulling strings everywhere. In other words, they were a nation, but arranged unlike other nations, not geographically and locally, but as a layer on top of other nations. You’re assuming it’s natural that ordinry Germands and ordinary Russians needed and wanted war. It doesn’t occur to you that Jews, controlling all sides, controlling propaganda in Germany and Russia and everywhere else, could easily build up war faver and then get both sides to kill off huge numbers of goyim.

    1. I can’t really say, as I am not familiar with his work. I just did a casual check and it looks like he is into a lot of the death faker theories, which is a red flag, in my opinion.

      1. What do you mean death faker theories? Such as Sandy hook with all its supposedly fake dead children?

        1. There’s a dedicated group that goes around claiming famous people fake their deaths and are living in hiding or assumed the identity of other people. It’s a group that infiltrates conspiracy circles and tries to misdirect. It seems to have started around the time the “Alex Jones is Bill Hicks” memes started surfacing.

          They make it seem that all deaths of famous people were faked and that none of them really die. Obviously, this is ridiculous. Conspiracy nonsense to discredit authentic conspiracies, perhaps.

          1. Mathis says for example [1] Lincoln’s assassination was a fake, a psyop, and makes a good case [2] JFK wasn’t murdered; the whole thing was a complicated psyop. He makes a good case. [3] Lennon’s death was faked; again, very good case.
            … He also says Mullins, Smedley Butler, John Reed and many others have the function of blackwashing, typically by claiming things then getting jailed or put into loony bins etc.
            If you’re going to analyse controlled opposition, I’m afraid you have to do better.

    1. And, wow. What a guy you are! Obscenities abound in your vocabulary! The moment someone disagrees with you you insult them with such vulgar language. You surely seem to think you’re better than the rest of us schmoes!

        1. Do you have any opinion on the Phoenician Navy? Since we all speak languages which can be traced back to them, and from them to the Aryans, I wonder your thoughts about it? I also can understand M. West’s frustration, when you think you have found any honest online place, or anyplace to discuss things, and then are just told, “nah not interested,” it can be very deflating and souring to someone’s heart and soul.

          1. It was inevitable that there would be conflict. After all, this M. West character devoted a whole webpage into exposing the “fraud” of Christianity as false opposition to Jewry. And he didn’t insult once; he did it to me, when I disagreed with his ideas.

  3. Hi Timothy Fitzpatrick, I have two questions, do you think Maurice Pinay is controlled opposition?

    Second question: Do you believe there is a virus? or is this just justification for social engineering? I’m asking because, for example, I see Photograph of Jared Kushner and his wife when they are on a family moment or on a boat trip, and I see him sometimes wearing masks, sometimes not, and some people around him wearing masks.

  4. A Controlled Narrative -Slavery..

    White slaves transported to the colonies suffered a staggering loss of life in the 17th and 18th century. During the voyage to America, the white slaves were kept below deck for the entire nine to twelve week journey. They were chained with 50 other men to a board, with padlocked collars around their necks. The weeks of confinement below deck in the ship’s stifling hold often resulted in outbreaks of contagious disease, including cholera and dysentery.

    Ships carrying white slaves to America often lost half their slaves to death. According to historian Sharon V. Salinger of the University of California, Riverside, “Scattered data reveal that the mortality for [white] servants at certain times equaled that for [black] slaves in the ‘middle passage,’ and during other periods actually exceeded the death rate for [Black] slaves.”

    Ms. Salinger affirms a death rate of ten to twenty percent over the entire 18th century for black slaves on board ships en route to America compared with a death rate of 25% for white slaves.

    Foster R. Dulles in Labor in America writes that white slaves “experienced discomforts and sufferings on their voyage across the Atlantic that paralleled the cruel hardships undergone by negro slaves on the notorious Middle Passage.”

    Dulles says the whites were “indiscriminately herded aboard the ‘white guinea men,’ often as many as 300 passengers on little vessels of not more than 200 tons burden–overcrowded, unsanitary…The mortality rate was sometimes as high as 50% and young children seldom survived the horrors of a voyage which might last anywhere from seven to twelve weeks.”

    Independent investigator A.B. Ellis in the Argosy writes concerning the transport of white slaves, “The human cargo, many of whom were still tormented by unhealed wounds, could not all lie down at once without lying on each other. They were never suffered to go on deck. The hatchway was constantly watched by sentinels armed with hangers and blunder busses. In the dungeons below all was darkness, stench, lamentation, disease and death.”

    In the past, white slavery was acknowledged as having existed in America only as “indentured servitude.”

    Such indentured servants were, for the most part, convicts, who served a term of four to seven years laboring on the farms, plantations, and estates in Virginia, Georgia, Maryland, and the Carolinas in exchange for their freedom. But they represented only a small fraction of the hundreds of thousands of whites who remained slaves for life. Such slavery was hereditary: children of the white slaves also became chattel without hope of freedom.

    In George Sandy’s laws for Virginia, Whites were enslaved “forever.” The service of Whites bound to Berkeley’s Hundred was deemed “perpetual.”

    Throughout the colonial period, white slaves remained the main labour force on the Virginia and Maryland plantations, outnumbering Africans by as many as four to one.

    Benjamin Franklin suggested the American authorities should send rattlesnakes back to England in return for such unwelcome imports.

    Whites remained slaves until the Emancipation Proclamation. In 1855, Frederic Law Olmsted, the landscape architect who designed New York’s Central Park, was in Alabama on a pleasure trip and saw bales of cotton being thrown from a considerable height into a cargo ship’s hold. The men tossing the bales somewhat recklessly into the hold were Negroes; the men in the hold were Irish.

    Olmsted inquired about this to a ship worker. “Oh,” said the worker, “the niggers are worth too much to be risked here; if the Paddies are knocked overboard or get their backs broke, nobody loses anything.”

    At present, several African American groups are seeking reparations from the United States government for the time their ancestors spent as slaves. One group, the African World Reparations and Repatriation Truth Commission, is demanding an astronomical $777 trillion.

    Blacks have been purposely misled by the Jewish people who, in previous
    centuries, built their fortunes in the transatlantic slave trade, and who continue to
    manipulate and exploit us even today. Because most black people make no
    distinction between Jews and whites, it is easy for the Jews to evade justice and
    escape the blame for the wrongs that they have inflicted on our people for
    centuries by convincing blacks that it was the white man who did it. In most
    cases the vast majority of the white race had nothing to do with slavery or other
    crimes that have been committed against our people. Whites were and continue
    to be exploited and manipulated by the Jews, the same as blacks, and their race
    is even more hated by the Jew, where blacks are simply disregarded by the Jews
    with indifference, as are other races. We are all simply pawns to the Jews who
    have no other use for us beyond being a source of profit to them and a weapon
    that can be used to help destroy whites, who they see as their sworn enemies, by
    encouraging us to breed with them until there are no longer any whites left.

    On another note:

  5. “why would someone want to keep their worldview a secret from others?” hahahahahahahahahahhhh

    this is an endless war planet, always has been, always will be. worlds too big, too many people, too many different groupings all armed to the teeth. what i’ve noticed is the biggest jew fighters “out there” are crypto-catholics. now there’s a (((hidden))) controlled opposition for you that goes back to roman times

Leave a Reply