By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Sept. 16, 2022 Anno Domini
Normally I wouldn’t care what some obscure Protestant thinks, but because E511 Ministries’ video presentations are so thought provoking about political deception, I felt I had better give my analysis of it, as controlled opposition is the focus of my blog. (see E511 videos here, here, and here)
John Blanchette of E511 attempts to debunk exposure of the New World Order in general as a Satanic decoy designed to get people trapped in a distracting fleshly paradigm which ultimately will make them more vulnerable to sin and to the still-yet-future anti-Christ deception of the world. To my readers, this concept won’t be new to them, as I have tried to argue that movements like anti-Zionism, anti-globalism (i.e., the kind put forth by those like Alex Jones, Dugin, etc.), and even some anti-Communists movements are controlled opposition designed to corral and stifle legitimate opposition to what I deem a Judeo-masonic-Bolshevik conspiracy against God and man. According to Blanchette, I am stuck in the fleshly mindset of the “false light” by speaking out against Communism, Judaism, Freemasonry (things created expressly to oppose God), and also for being patriotic and a nationalist.
There are arguments with which I agree, however. One theme of Blanchette’s analysis is that Satan will use a liberation script to gain acceptance from an otherwise opposed public. He is correct that the New Age movement is being used to co-opt worldwide populism. Also, Blanchette rightfully sees Vladimir Putin, Qanon, the “Great Awakening”, Jordan Peterson, Alex Jones, Pizzagate, the caricaturization of “wokeism”, etc., as being part of the “false light gnostic awakening movement”. They are indeed decoys of an organized plot to mislead the public. But then he will say that labeling these persons/groups as controlled opposition is yet another deception, as it keeps you stuck in a fleshly trap and not in spiritual state. Ironically, he claims that being anti-X, Y, Z from either a patriot or Christian viewpoint will lead one into Gnosticism. But isn’t attempting to separate the physical from the spiritual a tendency toward Gnosticism itself? He says that to fight or rise up against conspiracies and/or their conspirators are what Satan wants. Now, I would agree that fighting against anything without God and His truth as the objective could lead someone towards a deceptive end, but self-evident truths are not necessarily bankrupt outside of a spiritual context. And although we do not wrestle against flesh and blood but against principalities and powers, we do not abandon the material world, for our families and friends are worth fighting for, as are the unsaved. We even have a Godly duty to prolong and protect the lives of ourselves. This is not Gnosticism or fleshly (Blanchette needs to read St. Thomas Aquinas). The longer we can stave off execution of the anti-Christ system, the more time we have to repent, do righteous works, and to help others repent and accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour. Does Blanchette realize why controlled opposition was created? It wasn’t created for it’s own sake but to prevent real opposition from destroying it. It was created to neutralize as a counter measure.
I think that anti-conspiracism, as it were, can be a distraction to the point where it blinds people spiritually, but I don’t think it’s always or even mostly the case, as Blanchette seems to argue. The Bible warns of conspiracies (e.g., Jeremiah 11:9) and the Catholic Church has warned of conspiracies against God, His people, and His created world since its inception. Are they, too, getting caught up in the “false light”?
Blanchette claims that world Jewry, which he naively calls Zionist Jewry (he doesn’t understand that anti-Zionism is controlled opposition fostered by Jewry itself) is the harlot of the Apocalypse that God has set up to be destroyed by the anti-Christ Beast system in the end. It is possible that world Jewry could be double crossed by Satan in the end, but nobody really knows. Nobody has a guaranteed interpretation of the Apocalypse. But if world Jewry is not the authentic Semitic nation that followed God in ancient times, then it’s difficult to argue that Satan would double cross Jewry because they were at one time God’s chosen people and the devil would get a kick out of annihilating God’s chosen. I would argue that if world Jewry were the Edomites/Khazars that they seem to be, Satan could use them all the way to the end of the world. Why would a double cross be needed?
Blanchette can’t really bottle it all up. It seems that he rightfully recognizes some things as controlled opposition but can’t form a coherent narrative about how they fit in with an end times deception or with the current geopolitical trend. I appreciate his zeal, but his analysis seems unfocused, confused, and at times, wrong. Behind most of the deceptions in our day lurks the Jewish Kabbalah, something he doesn’t seem to mention. Decoys, deceptions, and controlled opposition are militarily foisted onto the masses as part of a dialectical ritual outlined in the Kabbalah and its splinter teachings.
I watched some of E511’s videos and he has good points in some of his videos. However, because he is a Protestant he doesn’t understand who nor what the Church is nor who the Israel is. As nearly all Protestants he believes that jews are God’s chosen people and that the geographical Israel is the Israel referred to in the end times prophecies. They believe in the return of the jews into their land in 1948 was part of the fulfilment of God’s Old Testament prophecies and that Israel must not be criticized for it will attract God’s wrath upon the one who does so. That’s the classic you get from most Protestants. Only very few understand that political jewry is the synagogue of Satan and that today’s jews are not ancient Israelites. E511 dismisses Khazaria and Khazars as a false theory which has no basis in the Bible, he also rejects the notion that Christians should resist the tyranny but should humbly submit to it (oh, that serves demonic bolsheviks brilliantly, does it not) and then as you pointed out he has just one blanket view of those who resist the NWO: all are pawns of Satan being led to the false light. Good that you brought him up in your blog because I wanted to point out to you those important points which one must bear in mind and reject as you rightly put it as a confused view. While speaking of confused views, may I ask a bit of help about an alleged claim that Helena Blavatsky supposedly made about Jesuits being part of the kabbalistic hierarchy. Because we are in the end times and as it’s been prophesied it will be difficult to recognise what’s true and what’s false, I find that when it comes to certain obscure matters it’s difficult to determine whether it’s been made up or if it’s genuine. Another Protestant who has a channel on bitchute called endtimeswatchman understands unlike most Protestants that jews are not the ancient Israelites, he understands Kabbalah, Talmud and Zohar being the satanic doctrine. He understands that it has its roots in the ancient Babylon but then he strays off completely when he says that the Catholic Church was founded by the same pharisaical jewry that forms today’s synagogue of Satan. It’s absolutely futile to reason with him as he is bent on believing he divides the Word of God correctly and that he is an enlightened by the Holy Spirit and born again Christian who has a discernment of right and false. It turned out just recently that he was born to an Irish Catholic family so that’s another classic when a weak and badly instructed Catholic falls from the faith and becomes a staunch Protestant. He never refers to himself as such but rather as a true biblical Christian. In one of his recent videos he had that provoking quote supposedly made by Blavatsky about Jesuits. I know what you wrote about Jesuit conspiracy theory and I fully agree with your view but from time to time I get these surprises which don’t seem to make sense. I wanted to write to you about it and probably even get help from your contributor in research Andy Sloan who is not against the Catholic Church but rather recognises it as the one founded by the Lord Jesus Christ and he sure is way better informed about these nooks and crannies when it comes to certain things concerning conspiracies than I am.
The vast majority claiming to be Jews are not and say so themselves. They are the Synagogue of Satan we are warned about in Rev. 2 & 3.
Could part of the reason for the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East be found in the following?
“Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a ‘Jew’ or to call a contemporary Jew an ‘Israelite’ or a ‘Hebrew.’” (Richard Siegel and Carl Rheins, eds., “Identity Crisis,” The Jewish Almanac, (New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1980) p. 3.)
That sentence is the opening sentence of the First Chapter entitled “IDENTITY CRISIS” of the 1980 Jewish Almanac. That today’s Jews are not genetic Israelites is also admitted in “The Jewish Encyclopedia,”
the “Enyclopedia Judaica,” “The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia,” “The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia,” and by many of their historians.
According to three Jewish encyclopedias and Flavius Josephus, the entire Edomite nation was forced into converting to Judaism and became known as Judahites at the time of the high priest John Hyrcanus (Maccabaeus):
“…in the days of John Hyrcanus (end of the second century B.C.E.) … the Edomites became a section of the Jewish people.” (“Edom,” Encyclopaedia Judaica (Jerusalem, Israel: Encyclopaedia Judaica Company, 1971) Volume 6, p. 378.)
“They were then incorporated with the Jewish nation….” (“Edom, Idumea,” The Jewish Encyclopedia (New York & London: Funk and Wagnalls Company, 1904) Volume V, p. 41.)
“…from then on they constituted a part of the Jewish people, Herod [King of Judea] being one of their descendants.” (Cecil Roth and Geoffrey Wigoden, “Edom (Idumea),” The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1977) p. 589.
“…they submitted to the use of circumcision, and the rest of the Jewish ways of living; at which time … they were hereafter no other than Jews.” (Flavius Josephus, “The Antiquities of the Jews,” Josephus, (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1960) Book XIII, Chapter IX, Verse 1, p. 279.)
We keep hearing that if we don’t bless the modern State of Israel (which America has been doing since at least 1948) that we will be cursed. However, it seems it’s been just the opposite, Since 1948, you name it, and there’s not an area in America wherein she hasn’t become worse off. Could the reason have something to do with the fact we’ve identified the wrong people as being Israel. See Revelation 2:9 and 3:9.
Today’s non-Israelite Jews are not the only one with an identity problem. See free online book “The Mystery of the Gentiles: Where Are They and Where Are They Now?” at http://www.missiontoisrael.org/mystery-of-gentiles/index.php.
Well, said, Christine. As for Andy Sloan, he and I have parted ways due to Andy’s alleged theft from multiple readers of this site.
Thank you for your response. I’m sorry to hear that about Andy. Is that theft a financial one or do the readers mean that he supposedly stole their content…? It baffles me how he could have entertained even an idea of a theft when he professes to be a traditional Catholic. There is so much division going on everywhere. It’s really bad and horrible. Are you interested in helping me out with regards to the alleged quote of Helena Blavatsky concerning the Jesuits? There are some disturbing things contained within it and I need to find out if it’s just a disinfo piece, projection just as it’s done with the alleged Extreme Oaths of Jesuits which I really believe is a fakery and a projection tactic by the judeo-masons because it completely mirrors the Masonic Oath that they take in their rituals. All they changed is they replaced their grand master with the pope and added some other nasty things like breaking children’s skulls etc and then claimed that this is the secret Extreme Jesuit Oath. Total projection tactic: accuse your enemy of the very thing you are guilty of. They sure are very skilled in doing that. Let me know if you are interested and I’ll send you a screenshot of her quote. Thank you.
Andy is accused of financial theft. If true, it is quite scandalous to the Church and to those involved. I’ll try my best to help you out regarding Blavatsky. If I forget, please remind me again.
Thank you for your response. I really hope that it’s not true that Andy is guilty of a theft. I really and sincerely hope and pray that it’s not true. As for Blavatsky’s quote: it took me so long to find it in the video. I had to go through so many of the ENDTIMESWATCHMAN’s videos and because I didn’t know at which time it was it took me hours to find it. Eventually I did, thank goodness and I took a screenshot of her alleged quote but now I don’t know how to get it across to you as it won’t allow me to paste it into this comment. Do you know of the IT method that I could use?
John has some good content but if you don’t agree with him 100%, he gaslights you! He is very rude mostly to women (says things like this is why women were told to be quiet in the church). He will dismiss you as a brother or sister in Christ if you disagree with him especially on the topic of who the true Israel of God is! You cannot speak of that false nation state ofbIsrael or you will be shadowbanned on his channel. He is good content but he is rude and arrogant and prideful!!
Interesting, GoyGirl. Who does he say Israel is?
He believes the return of the people in 1948 (Rothschild political state) are the true “Israel of God”.
As a Christian that was raised on the scofield futurism zionism, I have come to learn how he high jacked the evangelical movement back in the early 1900s. You have written a well articulated piece. After following Timothy and also listening to pastor Chuck Baldwin, my eyes have been opened, and a new learning has begun. I think the biggest struggle is unlearning all the falsehoods that were taught, overcoming them and re learn Gods intended truth.