Hitler & the Kabbalistic, Talmudic creation of WW2.
Quote from joshf731 on September 29, 2025, 17:18Quote from Timothy Fitzpatrick on September 25, 2025, 20:12Josh. Can’t remember if I asked this before but what happened to your content from page 1 of this thread?
I deleted all of the pages for a fresh start. A lot of the research previously was all over the place, and now it is easier to follow the forum post as a whole.
OK, I can’t remove those blank posts. Is this yours? https://web.archive.org/web/20230328185656/http://www.judaism.is/assets/hitler-and-the-talmudic,-kabbalistic-creation-of-world-war-two.-(version-2.0).pdf
The famous Satanist, American Jew Anton LaVey (born Howard Levey) [22] owned the largest collection of Nazi German antiquities in the United States. [23]
[22] Massimo Introvigne, Satanism: A Social History, Brill Pub., Leiden, (2016), s. 302, 315; George Michael, Theology of Hate: A History of the World Church of the Creator, University Press of Florida, (2009), s. 229, v. 16.
[23] Goodrick-Clarke, s. 262-263, v. 2. [...] Nazi chants and salutes are used in the Church of Satan, a sect devoted to devil-worship and unbridled sensual gratification, which was founded in 1966 in San Francisco. Anton Szandor LaVey, The Satanic Rituals (New York, 1972); (The King of Satanism in America today is Anton LaVey, a former circus lion-tamer who greatly admires the Nazis. LaVey's book, The Satanic Bible, published in 1969, is dedicated to a puzzling mixture of people, with one entry reading: "To Karl HAUSHOFER, a teacher without a classroom.") —Dusty Sklar, The Nazis and the Occult, Dorset Press, New York, (1977), s. 63.
last para & footnotes 22-23
https://joelsusikomedia.blogspot.com/2019/07/natsi-saksa-12-karl-maria-wiligut-1866.html
Karl HAUSHOFER (married to a Jew) was a promoter of the Nazi Party — a member of an occult lodge
https://elconfidencialdigital.com/articulo/la_voz_del_lector/haushofer-ocultismo-nazi/20211209184239318263.html
“Haushofer is the historian of the Nazi Party, but it will be remembered that this same Professor Haushofer was the General Haushofer who took no action against the Communists during the Red putsch. In fact, when the Reds seized control of the Bavarian government, General Haushofer took an oath of loyalty to the Red regime. Now he was a Nazi bigwig, despite the fact that hatred of Communism is the chief tenet of the Hitlerian doctrine. In addition, at the time, Kurt Haushofer was married (and still is) to a wealthy Jewess. Haushofer was responsible for the National Socialist foreign policy.”
page 47, 4th para
https://mailstar.net/otto-strasser-flight.html
“This is the same line of reasoning employed by retired US military intelligence officer and “Setian” Satanist Michael Aquino to defend his Satanic cult, the Temple of Set, from allegations of neo-Nazism extending from his fawning over Mein Kampf and pilgrimage to Wewelsburg Castle (a site strongly associated with Nazi occultism) by “pointing out that several members of the Temple of Set were of Jewish origin” (Introvigne, Satanism 351). As we saw in 6.1.1 and 6.3.3, this duplicitous claim, from the Satanist point of view, only strengthens the neo-Nazi character of the Temple of Set, since the “orthodox” Satanic opinion is that Adolf Hitler and other leaders of Nazi Germany were of Jewish origin (LaVey, Satan Speaks! 22–23). Therefore, according to the logic of Satanism, neo-Nazism in its truest form would, correspondingly, also have to be led by persons of Jewish origin.”
para 3
https://danielkbuntovnik.wordpress.com/2019/04/22/pinkwashing-how-the-satanic-temple-exploits-lgbtq-causes-as-a-progressive-fig-leaf/
The (((person))) who dragged France into a war against Germany during WWII.
Why France lost to Germany
It had nothing to do with Germany being superior in tactics and equipment, but because of the useless military doctrine France had to follow, which was inferior in every way to the German military doctrine, which was by design. Also, “poor leadership”.
“Weygand replaced his predecessor on May 19th, after the latter was sacked.114 If Maurice Gamelin’s faults were imprudence and lack of energy, Maxime Weygand’s was defeatism. As soon as May 25th, less than a week after his nomination, he showcased pessimism which could have been interpreted by some as defeatism.115 After the beginning of Fall Rot and the Germans crossed the Somme river in force, he began to openly speak in a defeatist tone.
However, when things seriously started looking bad for France, he could have at least attempted to pursue the fight from North Africa and from the other French colonies. Yet, Weygand mocked the idea of retreating to North Africa, and considered the option unrealistic. Weygand seemingly made no serious analysis regarding the North African option. Instead, he seemed to be motivated by emotion and intuition; he qualified the French colonies as “childishness,” and in his assessment – obviously without any tangible elements to back it up – the United Kingdom would sue for peace within “eight days” after France gives up fighting. He flat out expressed his refusal to pursue the fight outside continental France, excluding any attempt to do so. Such a behavior was completely out of place for the commander-in-chief of a democracy’s military.
Moreover, he agitated the spectrum of disorder and chaos to convince the other decision makers to rally his opinion. In a cabinet meeting, Weygand claimed that a communist insurrection had broken out in Paris, and that an armistice should be requested to control civil disorder. Following this claim, the minister of the Interior, Georges Mandel, phoned the Paris police chief, who indicated that all was quiet.
It can be said of Weygand that he crossed the line and did not respect his role of commander-in-chief in a democracy. Instead of sticking to managing military operations, leading his troops, and giving unbiased military advice to the civilian leadership, he overstepped his boundaries to ensure his opinion would prevail, quickly became defeatist although he had seemingly not even seriously considered an evacuation to the French colonies, and took sides without offering objective military advice to support the civilian decision-making process. In times of dire need, France needed an optimistic military leader who would genuinely attempt everything to turn things around – which in this specific situation could have even meant just continuing the fight another day from elsewhere. Instead, France got a pessimistic leader who thought that his opinion was the only one which was right.”
paras 58-61
https://web.archive.org/web/20220118071141/https://warwriters.com/why-france-lost-in-1940/
Now it's pretty clear that Weygand (see above link) was a saboteur, there's no other way to explain this treasonous behavior.
Maxime Weygand's ancestry is supposedly “unknown” But…
“With Thérèse, David de Léon Cohen closely monitors the childhood, schooling and beginnings of his military career of Maxime Weygand, born in Brussels to unknown parents, future army general and member of the French Academy. David Cohen takes care of Maxime Weygand but will not be his official guardian until March 28, 1885. Some authors think that Thérèse Denimal would certainly be the mother of the future general and that David de Léon Cohen would be his father”
para 3
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_de_L%C3%A9on_Cohen
The President of France (1959-1969) Charles de Gaulle was of Jewish descent, according to Roger Peyrefitte.
Association of Jewish Refugees (AJR) Journal, Vol. LII No. 3 (1997)
Article: Some unfamiliar family trees
page 13
https://ajr.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/1997_march.pdf
Charles de Gaulle & Freemasonry.
Grand Master of the Grand Orient: “It was General De Gaulle, it was he who gave us [Freemasonry] strength and vigor.”
https://profidecatholica.com/2023/02/03/lettre-du-grand-orient-et-de-la-grande-loge-de-france-a-charles-de-gaulle-en-date-du-18-octobre-1944-videos/?amp=1
'Judeo-Plutocracy and Bolshevism' — French leaflet from the Second World War (1943) showing Stalin as a Mason walking a boyish Charles de Gaulle under a sabre arch, with Churchill and Roosevelt at the front.
Quote from joshf731 on July 1, 2025, 19:21Mussolini/Italian Fascism: https://archive.ph/o0KIQ , https://archive.ph/bADns , https://archive.ph/SEtUf , https://archive.ph/82k0Z , https://archive.ph/v4sLD
Mussolini a Freemason - https://fitzinfo.net/forum/topic/hitler-the-kabbalistic-talmudic-creation-of-ww2/?part=2#postid-2082
More Jewish-Masonic connections to Fascism.
Italian Daily Newspaper “L'Adige”
“Many fascists of Jewish origin, whose history has not yet been adequately considered, saw their faith in the Regime, which they themselves had helped to build, collapse; one name for all of them, that of Gino Arias, who was among the greatest theorists of corporatism.”
para 7
https://www.giornaleadige.it/2022/10/26/la-marcia-su-roma-vista-da-verona-il-terzofascio-fondato-appena-due-giorni-dopo-san-sepolcro/
Gino Arias - also a Freemason
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gino_Arias#cite_ref-1
“Senator Liliana Segre forgets that among the 61 founders of the Italian Fasci di Combattimento in Milan in 1919, there were 5 [known] Jews: Cesare Goldman, Eucardio Momigliano, Gino Rocca, Riccardo Luzzatto, and Pietro Jacchia.”
para 2
https://www.agerecontra.it/2022/10/senatrice-segre-non-si-lasci-tirare-dalla-giacchetta/
Cesare Goldman - Freemason
“Goldmann's involvement has also generated a discussion about the actual role played by Freemasonry in the formative process of fascism”
para 6
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cesare_Goldmann
Eucardium Momigliano - Freemason
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eucardio_Momigliano#cite_ref-1
Pietro Jacchia - Freemason
https://www.quest-cdecjournal.it/fascist-jews-in-trieste-social-cultural-and-political-dynamics-1919-1938/#_ftnref43
Mussolini prohibited a book called 'Venetian Secret Agents' that referenced a certain 'Moisè Mussolin' - an 18th century Jew."
Poverty Bay Herald, Vol. LIV, Issue 16594, 9 March 1928, Page 5
“Mussolini was said to have Jewish blood in his veins. One of his first actions was to stop the anti-Jewish riots and to secure a huge loan from the Jewish money-lenders of New York. His Minister of Interior and the four strongest leaders of the Fascist movement were Jews.”
para 2
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19280309.2.25?items_per_page=10&page=2
JTA 1926 - Jewish Bank Supports Mussolini, Congressman Charges
“The Banca Commerciale Italiana is largely responsible for Mussolini’s policy. Representative Rainey added that the Banea Commerciale is a Jewish bank.”
Italy’s wealthiest Jew (reputed to possess $50,000,000) "has been a supporter and close friend of Il Duce since the early days of Fascism."
Israeli academic paper.
"The Jews played a prominent role in the ideological formulation and actualization of two of the three main fascist movements of the twentieth century – Soviet Communism and Italian Fascism. With Lenin’s death in January 1924, three Jews and a Georgian took control of Russia: Lev Bronstein, Grigory Radomilski, Lev Rosenfeld, and Joseph Dzugashvilli. They are better known by their Soviet names – respectively: Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Stalin. The heads of the CHEKA, the NKVD, and up to the KGB were mostly Jews, from Moses Solomonovitch Uritzky to Genrikh Yagoda to Andropov. Yakov Ginzburg (Sverdlov), who supervised the expulsion of the Czar’s family to Yekaterinburg in the Ural Mountains and their slaying there, as well as the commander of the unit that carried out the slaughter, who shot the Czar in the forehead from a range of zero, one Yakov Yurovski – were Jews.
The proportion of Jews involved in the creation, planning, and management of the Gulag Archipelag and forced-labor camps was much higher than their proportion in the Party elite, where in any case they held a considerable part of the key positions. Names such as Aron Solts, Yacov Rappoport, Lazar Kogan, Matvei Berman, and Naftaly Frenkel still strike terror in the hearts of Gulag veterans. The role of Lazar Kaganovitch in the organization of the camps for people who were kidnapped for slave labor, and also in the “collectivization” process that brought the death of millions, is among the most notorious.
Jews such as Angelica Balabanoff had a decisive influence on the formation of the spiritual world of Mussolini in his leftist-anarchist period. Another example is that of Margareta Sarfatti (who edited Gierarchia, el Duce’s fascist organ). Five Jews (A. Finzi, J. Pontremoli, A. Jarach, E. Jona, C. Sarfatti) were among the founders of the fascist nucleus of the “War Organization” (Fasci di combattimento) in March 1919. Those who formulated the socio-economic concept of Italian fascism – “the state of corporations” – both on the ideological and practical levels, were predominantly Jews. Thus, for example, Guido Jung, finance minister and a senior member of the Supreme Fascist Council. Thus also Guido Arias, the senior ideologue of the socio-economic concept of fascism; L. Toeplitz, the chief banker of Italy; and Otto Herman Kahan, a great admirer of el Duce and one of the pillars of banking and American philanthropy. The hard-core of Mussolini’s economic advisers strictly consisted of three Jewish senators (H. Ancona, A. Luria, T. Meyer). Indeed, not for nothing did Alfred Rosenberg call Mussolini “Judenknecht” (Jewish lackey)."
paras 1-3
https://web.archive.org/web/20210309173426/http://www.acpr.org.il/NATIV/2000-2/stavxs.htm
"But in 1922 something very important happened in Italy: the March on Rome and the advent of Fascism. Freemason Volpi finances the rise of Benito Mussolini (with the participation of the usual Venetian investors). Let us not forget that all four of the fascist quadrumvirs (Balbo, De Bono, Bianchi and De Vecchi) are Freemasons. At the same time, (Polish Jew) Toeplitz, through the intercession of his friend (Italian Jew) Margherita Sarfatti, helped Mussolini with Bank advertisements in his newspaper "Il Popolo d'Italia" and some hidden subsidies."
(see halfway - section Epilogue of the quadrumvirate. advent of fascism.)
https://web.archive.org/web/20230323041652/https://aldogiannuli.it/quadrumvirato-ascesa-mussolini/
Quadrumvirs:
"In ancient Rome, quadrumvir was an elective post assigned to four citizens having police and jurisdiction power, elected by the Senate.
At the beginning of Italian Fascism, they were a group of four leaders that led Benito Mussolini's March on Rome in October 1922. They were all involved in the Fascist party under Mussolini and had been involved in politics and/or war in the period leading up to the Fascist dictatorship. They were:
Michele Bianchi, a revolutionary syndicalist leader.
Emilio De Bono, a leading Italian General who had fought in WW1.
Cesare Maria De Vecchi, a member of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, as well as a colonial administrator.
Italo Balbo, a Blackshirt leader and leader of the Ferrara Fascist organisation."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrumvirs
The March on Rome was an organized mass demonstration and a coup d'état in October 1922 which resulted in Benito Mussolini's National Fascist Party (PNF) ascending to power in the Kingdom of Italy.
Hitler in Vienna.
Hitler visited the Jewish Jahoda family during his time in Vienna. A member of the family, Marie, went on to work for (Jew) Max Horkheimer - Significant figure of the Frankfurt school.
German-Austrian author and historian Brigitte Hamann.
In Vienna, Hitler did not merely encounter Jews of the lower classes, but also had sporadic glimpses into the lives of well-to-do, educated, middle-class Jews. For in 1908, August Kubizek, who earned some money as a viola player at private evening performances, occasionally took him along to such concerts, for example, to the house of a "family of a well-to-do factory owner at Heiligenstädter Strasse, Dr. Jahoda." We can clearly identify this Dr. Jahoda.
para 1
https://www.porges.net/JewsInVienna/6TwoExamples.html
“In 1945 she (Marie Jahoda) went to the USA where she first worked as an assistant to Max Horkheimer.”
para 2
https://mariejahodacenter.rub.de/en/about-marie-jahoda/
Max Horkheimer a member of B’nai B’rith
https://www.bnaibrith-ffm.de/de/history/b-nai-b-rith-in-frankfurt
Source:
https://x.com/uncomforta6167/status/1974430018957955225
The process in Western European history, is laid out in the protocols - Catholic Monarchy - Aristocracy - democracy- despotism
Protocol 1
WE SHALL END LIBERTY
26. In all corners of the earth the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the well-being of the GOYIM, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the GOY States. As you will see later, this helped us to our triumph: it gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card—the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the GOYIM, that class which was the only defence peoples and countries had against us. On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the GOYIM we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The qualifications for this aristocracy we have established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which our learned elders provide the motive force.
27. Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in our relations with the men, whom we wanted, we have always worked upon the most sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash account, upon the cupidity, upon the insatiability for material needs of man; and each one of these human weaknesses, taken alone, is sufficient to paralyse initiative, for it hands over the will of men to the disposition of him who has bought their activities.
28. The abstraction of freedom has enabled us to persuade the mob in all countries that their government is nothing but the steward of the people who are the owners of the country, and that the steward may be replaced like a worn-out glove.
29. It is this possibility of replacing the representatives of the people which has placed at our disposal, and, as it were, given us the power of appointment.
Protocol 10
WE SHALL DESTROY.
10. Liberalism produced Constitutional States, which took the place of what was the only safeguard of the GOYIM, namely, Despotism; (ie. Catholic Monarchy) and A CONSTITUTION, AS YOU WELL KNOW, IS NOTHING ELSE BUT A SCHOOL OF DISCORDS, misunderstandings, quarrels, disagreements, fruitless party agitations, party whims—in a word, a school of everything that serves to destroy the personality of State activity. THE TRIBUNE OF THE "TALKERIES" HAS, NO LESS EFFECTIVELY THAN THE PRESS, CONDEMNED THE RULERS TO INACTIVITY AND IMPOTENCE, and thereby rendered them useless and superfluous, for which reason indeed they have been in many countries deposed. THEN IT WAS THAT THE ERA OF REPUBLICS BECOME POSSIBLE OF REALIZATION; AND THEN IT WAS THAT WE REPLACED THE RULER BY A CARICATURE OF A GOVERNMENT—BY A PRESIDENT, TAKEN FROM THE MOB, FROM THE MIDST OF OUR PUPPET CREATURES, OR SLAVES. This was the foundation of the mine which we have laid under the GOY people, I should rather say, under the GOY peoples.
17. By such measure we shall obtain the power of destroying little by little, step by step, all that at the outset when we enter on our rights, we are compelled to introduce into the constitutions of States to prepare for the transition to an imperceptible abolition of every kind of constitution, and then the time is come to turn every form of government into OUR DESPOTISM.
18. The recognition of our despot may also come before the destruction of the constitution; the moment for this recognition will come when the peoples, utterly wearied by the irregularities and incompetence—a matter which we shall arrange for—of their rulers, will clamour: "Away with them and give us one king over all the earth who will unite us and annihilate the causes of disorders—frontiers, nationalities, religions, State debts—who will give us peace and quiet which we cannot find under our rulers and representatives."
Josh what do you make of the claim that the protocols were forgeries? From what I've read there are passages that have been appropriated from books such as Maurice Joly's Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1864).
Quote from Ryan Augustine on October 5, 2025, 21:09Josh what do you make of the claim that the protocols were forgeries? From what I've read there are passages that have been appropriated from books such as Maurice Joly's Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (1864).
I'm not convinced of these claims. For me, the Protocols are genuine.
The Jews have spent immense effort to try to suppress the Protocols, which seems odd, for a fake document.
Common-Sense magazine 1957. Pg 2 tells how Kerensky (Jew & mason), key in the Feb 1917 revolution, ordered every copy of the Protocols of Zion to be burnt
The articles by Philip Graves in the Times in 1921 vs the Protocols are discredited.
Michael Hagemeister, produced a text entitled The Protocols of the Elders of Zion: Between History and Fiction that, although it does not endorse the authenticity of the protocols, nevertheless controverts the standard narrative. It shows that arguments put forth against the Protocols in the Berne trial relied on extremely unreliable information and witnesses. A notable quote from it is:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/27669221
Those who have made in-depth analyses of the subject have shown serious flaws in the standard forgery arguments - Peter Myers made an in-depth critique of Norman Cohn, the leading proponent of the “Protocols as fake” idea, which includes this gem
“Cohn's arithmetic is incorrect. The word count of the parallel passages from the Protocols, as listed by Bernstein, is 4,361, while the word count of the Protocols is 26, 496. That is, the parallel passages comprise 16.45% of the Protocols; this is substantial but still less than one-sixth of the total. What Cohn especially omits to mention, is the Protocols' extensive coverage of the world finance system.”
page 82, para 2 https://mailstar.net/toolkit.html
Protocols: “God has granted to us, His Chosen People, the gift of dispersion, and from this, which appears to all eyes to be our weakness, has come forth all our strength, which has now brought us to the threshold of sovereignty over all the world.”
https://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion4.htm#protocol%20No.%2012
Chaim Weizmann: “A beneficent protection which God has instituted in the life of the Jew is that He has dispersed him all over the world.”
Of value is Leslie Fry's book Waters Flowing Eastward, a detailed analysis of the Protocols
Thanks Josh,
I admit I have not read either the dialogues or the protocols so I am out of my element, but I trust you on this matter. The inner Sherlock Holmes tells me that even a forgery may be right lol, or that an authentic document may have forged elements that have been added into it at later dates.
Zionism in National Socialist Jewish Policy in Germany
The Secret Roads (1956) Jon & David Kimche:
“Hitler himself stepped in and ordered in precise terms the encouragement of Jewish mass immigration to Palestine.” (p. 28)
“...the Fuehrer had decided again that Jewish emigration from Germany shall continue to be promoted by all available means. Any question which might have existed up to now as to whether in the Fuehrer's opinion such emigration is to be directed primarily to Palestine has thereby been answered in the affirmative.” (p. 30)
My First Eighty Years (1939), Bernard Horwich:
“The Hitler regime caused thousands of German Jews to look to Palestine as their only refuge.” (p. 330)
The realities of American-Palestine relations (1949) by Frank E. Manuel.
“The rise of Hitler is the sharp turning point in the history of modern Zionism.” (p. 303)
A. J Freiman, President of the Zionist Organization of Canada:
"Hitler has turned more Jews to Zionism than all the efforts of the world-wide Zionist organization." (Quoted in The Gazette, May 8 1933, p. 6)
The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 50, No. 4, On Demand Supplement (Dec., 1978) Zionism in National Socialist Jewish Policy in Germany, 1933-39 Author(s): Francis R. J. Nicosia
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1877301
