Narcissism and power at the root of E. Michael Jones’ cheap anti-Semitism to prop up Islam and Russia?

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
January 9, 2026 Anno Domini

It’s puzzled me for years what Kremlin perennialist E. Michael Jones’ primary objective is with his Communist racket over there in South Bend, Indiana.

Sure, he’s a shameless Kremlin toadie and advocate of Communism disguised as solidarism and labour-based value. He knows that cheap, superficial anti-Semitism is a tool with which gradually to acclimate Western conservatives to a backdoor acceptance of Communism. Throw in a few Catholic ideas to make it all legitimate looking and, poof! 

If the elderly Jones is an ideological Communist, then these beliefs are expected, so shilling them wouldn’t really be all that difficult for him. But there are plenty of other “alt-media” covert Communists to push this nonsense. Why would the Kremlin waste basic Commie shilling on a brilliant mind like Jones’? Yes, saturation is important in any shilling operation. But Jones has got to be one of the most intelligent Communists I’ve ever heard of. But even the intelligent can be deceived and can deceive themselves into believing nonsense, especially when lust blinds them. If Jones is as intelligent as he seems to be, then maybe he is not an ideological Communist. He seems to be a power guy, so maybe he feels empowered by Communism, by his Soviet backers, and the hold over others his Communist support affords him. 

Jones’ best work easily is Libido Dominandi, which is all about sexual passion. Jones doesn’t seem to struggle at all in the sexual lust department and knows well its power over those who submit to it. So, perhaps its a different kind of lust that plagues Jones. Perhaps it is a kind of lust for power. It has been said by those who know him that he is a narcissist, and we all know that narcissists thrive on power—even if that power seems insignificant to observers. Narcissists just can’t help themselves. Narcissists tend to be highly intelligent and, like the closely related sociopaths, tend to be wordsmiths (see Author describes E. Michael Jones as a prideful “malignant narcissist” who made himself a martyr for fame).

So, what is this seeming powerguy really up to in his work for the devil? The recurring pattern is Islam. Secondarily, it seems to be Russia, although Soviet power lurks behind both. It’s difficult to tell which narrative Jones shills more, Russia or Islam. Is the objective to get his mainly Catholic, conservative audience to warm up to Islam and Russia in the build up to the coming syncretic one-world religious and economic system, which will be headquartered in the East?

Jones just published on his site an excerpt from his article The West Has Failed: Tolkien, Traditionalism and Islamophobia in his rag Culture Wars, which continues the pattern of Russophilia and Islamophilia.

Jones advocates the tired Gaza genocide narrative as a grifter in Operation SIG and claims that Jewish power is dwindling merely because anti-Zionism is growing (contrary to popular belief, Jewry is not dependent on Zionism). Not only is Jewish privilege not dwindling, it’s increasing, at least among elite Jewry, Chabad—something Jones never talks about (see my article, Most powerful Jewish organization in world Chabad completely absent from E. Michael Jones’ writings).

Jones takes a post on X by a Jew rightfully calling out Muslims as murderers of Christians as another example of “Islamophobia”. Jones knows his audience eat up his cheap anti-Semitism and insinuates that because it was a Jew critical of Islam, it is automatically unwarranted and should, therefore, be dismissed.

“Instead of changing their behavior, they try to generate hatred for Muslims, as the neocons did after 9/11, or hatred of Germans as Morgenthau, Nizer, and Kaufmann did after World War II. All of these narratives are failing as the third republic, the American Empire, and Jewish privilege come to an end.”

Jones talks a lot about Jews needing to change their behaviour—with which we whole heartedly agree—but says nothing about Muslims needing to change their behaviour, when the two squabbling Semitic tribes are both of ill repute. You can tell that his comment about hatred of Germans was an afterthought that he threw in to make it look like his main concern was not solely the welfare of Muslims.

Why does an aging hispter reaping the benefits of capitalism while pushing Communism gain from brownnosing into the dirt a bunch of troglodytic Mohemmedans? He’s bridging the gap. Islamists not only serve as foot soldiers (Soviet Islam) for the revolution, they are the bridge to perennialist universalism. They are the key to Noahidism. Christianity and Judaism are irreconcilable, but Islam can be used to merge them, albeit unnaturally, whether directly or through dialectics.

Back to the article, Jones tells us that the threat of Sharia law in the West is all just alarmism perpetuated by “out-of-state” far Right activists pushing anti-Islamic narratives. Congratulations, Jones, you sound no different than CNN or the anti-Zionist Jewish Left. Why would Jones have a problem with Sharia law or droning Islamic prayer calls in Dearborn, Michigan or Minnesota when Jones himself is more than happy to shout “allahu ackbar” and believes Muslims and Christians follow the same God?

It’s highly suspicious that Jones has not talked about Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmitd’s admission on Russia Today a few years ago that Islam is being used by Jewry to clear out Christendom for the arrival of their false messiah. Jones has a lot to say about the Black-Jewish alliance, but when have you ever heard him talk about the Islamo-Jewish alliance? The Jewish dialectic of using Islam was birthed long before Islam was created (see Fallen angel Metatron told 2nd century Kabbalist sage Simon bar Yochai that Islam would be used to eradicate Christendom on behalf of Jewry).

In the article, Jones creates the perception that any criticism of Islam, whether it be from Tommy Robinson, Cam Higby, or an old man at the corner coffee shop is entirely the work of the Jews. The antics of provocateurs like Robinson may indeed by orchestrated, but Western opposition to Islam is absolutely warranted and imperative. His simpleton readers will not be able to see through this, though, because their understanding of the Jewish question is too shallow. They can’t see beyond the facade of Zionism the collaboration between the Jewish and Islamic elite, much less the collaboration between Russia and Jewry. Jones only focuses on the controlled opposition to Islam (Robinson, et al) because it is the easiest strawman. Jones wouldn’t stand a chance against a legitimate opponent of Islam. Someone like Trevor Loudon would tear Jones to pieces, just like Jones has been torn to pieces by race realists debunking his absurd stance on race.

And who is Jones to single out provocateurs like Robinson, Jake Lang, or Higby, when Jones himself has employed a well known Kremlin agent provocateur, David Reilly? Jones has no problem linking these provocateurs to his former employee, I assume because Jones is claiming ignorance of Reilly’s behaviour and background. How was the intelligent hipster not able to discern Reilly before he took him into his publishing house? And for how long  did Reilly continue to work for Jones while it was becoming more and more apparent his suspicious behaviour (alcoholism, entrapment, provocateuring, etc.)

“Missing from Grok’s database is the article which described Reilly’s attempt to take over Culture Wars magazine and clearly identified him as an FBI agent provocateur. During the early months of his employment as Culture Wars’ media guy, Reilly lived with fellow employee Mike Bajiackas in a rural area northwest of South Bend. Guns were part of that culture, and Mike B. introduced Reilly to Indiana gun culture in a way that would later cause serious problems:”

Jones conveniently glosses over all the things he shares in common with Reilly—to this day—like Russia and Alexander Dugin. Jones then goes on a lengthy tirade crafting the image that Reilly, the FBI, and Mossad were all working together to compromise Culture Wars. If the FBI is using provocateurs like Dave Reilly, it’s on a lower level than state actors like the Kremlin or Iran. Jones is twisting things to make himself come out looking clean, when he is actually as deep into the grifting as Reilly is.

Jones’ propping up of the Islamic ascent to the power of city halls in New York (Zohran Mamdani) and Dearborn (Abdullah H. Hammoud) as bulwarks against Jewish hegemony is laughable. Russian Communists have already claimed Mamdani as one of their own. We can only assume the same applies to Hammoud. Again, Jones is doing his best to ignore or obscure the Muslim-Jewish alliance. He’s a gatekeeper for this most crucial alliance against Christ and His Church.

Jones is a much more polished and reliable Kremlin operative than clowns like Dave Reilly. It’s easy to look better than a clown. Again, they have more in common than they don’t have in common. Operatives turn on each other all the time, especially in the Soviet controlled alt media. This is nothing new. Remember the staged Mark Dice-Alex Jones split that was miraculously healed not long after.

A new narrative has appeared from Jones’ bag of Chabadnik phylacteries. “Catholic Islamophoba”. For this, he blames an author for it, J.R.R. Tolkien, of Lord of the Rings fame. Here, Jones endorses the biggest lie of all time, the Soviet Union collapse of 1991, and portrays Catholic Islamophobia as evolving from anti-Communism. At least he (inadvertently?) admits that the two are one. Forget Mohammedan behaviour being the root cause of “Islamophobia”, it’s a children’s author. Jones made some plausible, unique interpretations of pop culture in Monsters of the Id, but as Jones would say, that Tolkien is responsible for a justifiable “phobia” of Muslims is absolutely preposterous!

But never let a good narrative go to waste.

“Tolkien despised Russia and held the Russians ‘more responsible for the present crisis and choice of moment than Hitler,’ writes Jones.

Tolkien is absolutely correct. Jones is absolutely treasonous. Nazism was a Soviet creation. But when has Jones, the great historian, ever talked about that? 

The excerpt ends and Jones concludes by appealing to, like every good kosher anti-Semite does, to the Balfour declaration, which is a Soviet distraction device (see Soviets founded state of Israel and Zionism; Balfour declaration a decoy). I am not sure where Jones goes with his Tolkien narrative and I refuse to pay him to see the entire article, but it seemed as if he was setting up Tolkien to be a pawn the Jews, as is the case with most of villains in Jones’ head.