COINTELPRO caught setting up strawman attacks against Alex Jones

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
August 19, 2014 Anno Domini

As the evidence continues to mount that Alex Jones is a counter-intelligence Zionist agent, the conspirators handling him are scrambling to throw the general public off the scent of the stinking COINTELRPO operation in Austin, Texas.

That’s where two diversionary strawman theories come into play: that Jones is a secret Jesuit agent and/or that Jones is really Bill Hicks, a deceased comedian and social critic from Texas.

Shills accuse Jones of being a Jesuit
The first theory is an obvious lie. Zionists have been using the Jesuit conspiracy theory for hundreds of years to cover up their own crimes, to keep people off their tails, and to defame their long-time enemy, the Catholic Church. While the Jesuit conspiracy theory is growing in general, it has been directed at Alex Jones as of late. The rhetoric goes that Jones is working on behalf of this alleged Jesuit-run New World Order, with the proof being that Jones never talks about the Jesuits. However, there are countless instances where Jones has talked about and criticized the Vatican and the Catholic Church. Jones has even denounced on air the theory that he is a Jesuit. There aren’t a lot of people being taken in by this theory, but the few who advocate it are vocal and get their message out with much persistence and consistency. If they aren’t being paid to do this, they are very passionate about it. If the shills don’t call Jones a Jesuit, they will call him either a Knight of Malta (no proof), or, if they have a hard time convincing someone of that, they will simply say then that he is Jesuit trained (again, no proof). One nut claims that because Jones uses the Swiss cross as the logo for his health products, he must be a Swiss Knight Templar, even though the Templars weren’t Jesuits, even though the Knights Templars haven’t existed for hundreds of years, other than the freemasons using the name only. The use of the Swiss cross as an international symbol is well known. And for all we know, Jones could deliberately have used the symbol to mess with his critics. After all, he has the incentive to indulge those who accuse him of being a Jesuit. Whatever takes the focus off of what he really is.

One of many examples of Alex Jones covering the goings on at the Vatican. So much for the theory that he is a secret Jesuit.

The Jesuit conspiracy theory has been spread by a small group of people, including Zionist diamond merchant Eric Jon Phelps, Alexander Hislop, F. Tupper Saussy, the Seventh Day Adventist Church (a Zionist offshoot), Malachi Martin (financed by the American Jewish Committee to spread disinformation about the Jesuits), establishment fictionalist Dan Brown, Edward Hendrie, and a few others. (In the near future, I will critique the Jesuit conspiracy theory in more detail)

Shills accuse Jones of being Bill Hicks
The other theory, that Jones is Bill Hicks, is so over the top and so ridiculous that nobody in their right mind would give it any attention. But that doesn’t matter, the point of this theory, and that of the Jesuit theory, is to muddy the waters, to divert attention away from Jones numerous connections to the Zionist establishment and the intelligence community. The source of this theory appears to be a blogger named “Mack Quigley,” who appears to have created many videos and designed many photo illustrations detailing the alleged proof that Jones is Hicks. This media is now circulating widely around the net, as is the media calling Jones a secret Jesuit. The story goes that Hicks didn’t really die but changed his identity to Alex Jones with the aid of facial surgery. Like the Jesuit theory, this theory appears to be another Zionist-created diversion. Quigley admits on his site that he is a Zionist. When he is not busy manipulating his “evidence” that Jones is Hicks, he is posting Zionist hate, like the following:

God Bless Israel – May they Destroy their Arab Enemies
The mindless echo-chamber of fake ‘alternative’ news is full of hypocritical morons and race-baiting Jew-haters who can’t think straight – and don’t want to because that’s part of their psyop. It’s fashionable for these clowns to use words like “criminal” to describe the State of Israel’s lawful conduct – even when it is defending itself against alien domestic insurgents operating within their own territory killing Israeli citizens.

I support Israel. From the Nile to the Euphrates, all that land belongs 100% to the Jews alone. It is their homeland forever. The Arabs need to get out and stay out. Their blood is on their own heads for trying to steal land that doesn’t belong to them.

We have lived to see a very interesting day. I can’t help but think we are on the verge of World War 3 and the tribulation period. Which means the rapture could happen at any time.

Even so come quickly Lord Jesus!

Incidentally, Quigley’s blog appears to have been created early in 2012, around the same time news of Jones’ ties to Stratfor broke and a year following the hack of Stratfor’s emails. And wouldn’t you know it, Quigley just happens to endorse the sister strawman attack against Alex Jones:

It’s reminiscent of how a documentary film-maker joined Fred Phelps church and suddenly they were making professional signs and had all sorts of web promotion. Either is Sanderson is a sincere and naive idiot who doesn’t realize he is being used, or he is involved with the Alex-Jones/Wittenberger crowd knowingly. Jesuits love the tactic of infiltration and subversion.
—Mack Quigley, Are Jews Christ Killers?

There seems to be a definite co-ordinated effort to discredit and quash Jones’ legitimate critics.

Jesuit-Hicks theories help Alex Jones stay in power
Because the two theories against Jones are so easily disprovable (what makes them each a strawman argument), it creates the perception that critics of Alex Jones are crazy or fulfills Jones’ claim that his critics are government operatives merely looking to discredit him. The claim that Jones is a Zionist double agent, however, is very easily demonstrable and is the only true threat to Jones in his position as patriot leader. So, it’s likely that Jones and his handlers, if they aren’t behind these strawman attacks, are welcoming them with open arms.


  1. Alex Jones has had ‘the Vatican dunnit’ – type guests on his show in the past: for example, Chris Pinto of ‘Lamp in the Darkness’ infamy.
    If Jones soft pedals on the Jesuit/Vatican issue, it’s because that as well as being a Zionist shill, he’s also in it for the money and Catholic money is as good as anybody else’s.

  2. There’s a guy who comments on various blogs insisting that the Jesuits, the Vatican, and the Knights of Malta are the “real conspiracy”, don’t you know. On a now defunct Irish alternative site he used to call himself the very Irish sounding “Seany Boy H”, or simply “Seany”. But, what do you know, on an English site he calls himself “WASP” – what could be more Anglo-Saxon and Protestant than that? There’s no doubt from both the style and the content he’s the same guy on both sites. I’ve also seen him on Makow, where he has yet another pseudonym. God knows how many other sites he trolls – in Sweden he’s probably “Sven the Viking”, and in Spain, “Diego, the Torreador”. The guy is a complete spoofer – he comes out with preposterous drivel such as: “of course it has long been proven that Stalin was a Jesuit”, and when challenged to substantiate his nonsense either ignores the challenge or waffles evasively. Incidentally Anthony Migchels (or McShill as I call him) is another pseudo-alternativist who peddles this anti-Jesuit tripe. He wrote a piece last year on Makow about the Jesuits’ alleged role in the rise of modern banksterism. I wrote a comment querying why his type never discuss the role of Protestantism in modern usury – you know – the religion that every US President bar one belonged to – and every British Prime Minister too. My comment wasn’t published – and no comment I’ve sent to Makow since has been published either.

  3. Couple weeks ago–I commented ” Has anyone questioned were does Alex Jones get the money to spon$or Prison Planet InfoWars and his high rolling life style. on very few commercials???– I caution folks-AJ could be a CIA MOSSAD collection agent,anyone that bad mouths Jews is listed.”
    I was red lined Banned for ever :^(

  4. Have you seen the movie Top Gum? Jones plays the role of Viper. His anti-police, government, and military reporting is training an entire nation to be afraid. His mission is to petrify a nation into submission and compliance. I know what he’s doing, but who he is working for is up for debate. Who owns Genesis? Who pays his salary? Those are his masters.

  5. Alex tells a story full of all the sound and fury, vim and vigor and rantings of a Texas cowboy. It is a story told by a high school graduate and hypocrite ready to hide behind the skirt of 1st Amendment while banning everyone that disagrees with his conception of the world.

    Hervé Ryssen
    Judaism is not merely a “religion,” as many Jews are overt atheists or agnostics, and they do not consider themselves less Jewish for all that. Jewry is also not a race even if it is true that a “trained eye,” most of the time, can recognize a Jewish appearance, that is to say, a characteristic pattern which is the result of their strict observance of endogamy for centuries. Jews see themselves as the “chosen ones” of God, and marriage outside the community is strictly frowned upon. However, mixed marriages do exist and have also helped to renew the blood of Israel during all the centuries spent in the various ghettos where the Jews preferred to live, separately and apart from the rest of the population. The essential condition for such mixed marriages is that the mother be Jewish, since Orthodox Rabbis recognize as Jewish only the child born of a Jewish mother. However, having just a Jewish father or grandparent can suffice for a person to identify completely with Judaism. Jewishness is therefore a “mental race” that has been shaped over the centuries by the Hebrew religion and the universalist project of Judaism.
    Judaism is essentially a political project. It is important for Jews to work toward the emergence of a world at “peace,” a peace meant to be universal and permanent. It is therefore not a coincidence that this word “peace” (shalom in Hebrew) is found frequently in Jewish discourse worldwide. In the perfect world that they are building, all conflicts will disappear between the nations. This is why Jews have been militating tirelessly for many years for the abolition of all borders, the dissolution of national identities and the establishment of a global empire of “peace.” The very existence of separate nations is considered to be responsible for the triggering of wars and turmoil. So they must be weakened and eventually replaced by a world government, a “one world government,” a “New World Order,” one single world-ruling authority that will permit happiness and prosperity to reign, Jewish-style, on earth.
    We find this idea more or less developed both in the writings of certain intellectual Marxists such as Karl Marx himself and the Jewish-French philosopher Jacques Derrida and also in the discourse of liberal thinkers such as Karl Popper, Milton Friedman and France’s Alain Minc. The idea is to unify the world by all means necessary and to generate cultural conflicts that will weaken nation-states. It is for this One World that intellectuals Jews labor tirelessly all over the world. Whether they call themselves left- or right-wing, liberal or Marxist, believers or atheists, they are the most ardent propagandists of the pluralistic society and of universal miscegenation, that is of racial mixture.
    Thus, all their strength the Jews – basically, ALL the vocal Jews in the world – encourage non-white immigration into every country in which they are located, not only because the multicultural society is their fundamental political aim, but also because the disintegration of national identity in each nation and the massive presence of anti-white immigrants is designed to prevent the original white population from succeeding in any nationalistic outbursts against the Jewish sway over finance, politics, and the media.
    All Jewish intellectuals, without any exception, are focused on this question of building the “pluralistic society” and for this they practice constant “vigilance against racism.” In France, influential writers and journalists such as Bernard-Henri Levy, Jacques Attali, Jean Daniel, Guy Sorman, and Guy Konopniki agree on pluralism and anti-racism despite their political divergences in other areas. This obsession, which is very characteristic of Judaism, is also manifested in movies, where many producers and directors are influential Jews. As soon as a film starts defending and promoting interbreeding, “tolerance” and pluralism, we can be sure that the producer of it is Jewish.
    Now we can understand better why the former communists and leftists of the 1970s did not have to make such a big leap to become today’s “neoconservatives.” They have merely switched to a different strategy to achieve the same goal: the rule by racially pure Jews over a racially mixed society.
    The fact is that after the Palestinian intifada began in October 2000, the Jews in France and the rest of the Western world have realized that nowadays the danger to their interests and their project comes primarily from Islam and from young African immigrants, both Arabic and black. Their aim is to strengthen the modern race-mixing and race-blending society, which they have contributed so much to establish in our country of France. But this mosaic now threatens to break up into separate communities, and this the Jews do not want. They want no separate identities or separateness at all, except a separate Jewish identity and Jewish separateness. Former Marxists in France such as Alexandre Adler, André Glucksmann, and Pascal Bruckner thus support nowadays, along with Alain Finkielkraut, the right-wing, pro-Washington, pro-Zionist party of Nicolas Sarkozy. And yet they have not become French patriots. They react only for the exclusive benefit of Jewry, asking, as American Jews proverbially do on every issue:
    “Is it good for the Jews?”
    The members of the Jewish sect are the most proselytizing people on earth, but unlike Christians or Muslims, who dream of converting all peoples of all races to their faith, the Jews have no plan to convert the world to their own faith, Judaism, but simply to encourage other nationalities to give up their national and religious identities – and live only for the goal of “tolerance.” The unceasing campaigns to blame all Whites for slavery, colonialism, the plundering of the Third World or for Auschwitz have no other purpose than putting the opponent on the defensive, and getting him on his knees not by violence but via guilt. When the Jews are the only people left on earth who are keeping their faith and their traditions, they will finally be recognized by everyone as God’s “chosen people.”
    Their “mission” (and Jews frequently use this term “mission”) is to disarm the other peoples, to dissolve anything which is not Jewish or Jewish-controlled, to grind the people down to a powder for making a new identity-free work force, and thus to favor a universal “peace” among the peoples who have no more “divisive” identities.
    As their prophet Isaiah said:
    “The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, the tiger will rest with the kid, the lion and the ram shall live together, and a young child will lead them” (Isaiah 11: 6-9).
    The Messiah, coming from Israel, and awaited for three thousands years, will establish anew the kingdom of David and will give the Jews an empire over all the earth. And certain Jewish texts explicitly call for this.
    Jews are therefore continuously encouraged to campaign, in whatever society they inhabit, in order to promote the unification of the world – and thus to also hasten the arrival of their promised and cherished Messiah. Propaganda is a Jewish specialty, and it is no coincidence that Jews become so influential in all the media. In their hands, the concepts of “tolerance” and “human rights” have become incredibly efficient weapons of white guilt and accusation against the majority culture. In fact, it is not through Jewish-sounding names or a Jewish physical appearance that we can best recognize Jews, but rather from what they write and say wherever they are on earth.
    Many Jews, as we know, played an absolutely huge role in the Soviet tragedy 1917-1991 and the thirty million deaths that marked this era. Let us remember that Karl Marx was born into a Jewish family and that Lenin himself had a Jewish maternal grandfather, that Leon Trotsky, the Bolshevik founder and head of the Red Army, was born a Bronstein, while Kamenev (real name: Rosenfeld) and Zinoviev (real name: Apfelbaum) were running the two Bolshevik-conquered capitals of Moscow and St. Petersburg. But the list of Jews who stood out in the mega-crimes of Communism is endless. It must be said and it must be repeated:
    Jewish officials and Jewish torturers bore a very heavy responsibility in this tragedy. The “perfect” world they concocted and which was supposedly “historically inevitable” turned out from the very beginning to be a nightmare for the Russian population. It was not until 1948 when the Jewish intellectual elite Jewish began distancing itself from the Stalinist government, and this was only because Stalin had launched his “anti-Zionist” campaign, meant to purge pro-Israel Jews from senior leadership positions.
    This indisputable Jewish guilt for the gigantic crimes of Bolshevism is now systematically being shoved down the Memory Hole (the phrase from George Orwell’s 1984). In Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s 2002 book Two Centuries Together, the Nobel Laureate and 11-year veteran of the Bolshevik gulag expresses outrage that Jewish intellectuals were still refusing to recognize their ethnic responsibility in the slaughter of millions of Christians. Solzhenitsyn also denounces modern Jews who pose as victims of an “anti-Semitic” Bolshevik government when that government was in fact heavily Jewish and Jews were among the worst perpetrators.
    This selective amnesia is necessary for a people who ceaselessly proclaim their “innocence” of any provocative acts, as we regularly note in their writings, for example in an editorial in Israel magazine of April 2003, “the first Israeli monthly magazine in the French language” written under the name of a certain André Darmon.
    He wrote:
    “To kill a Jew or a child makes God cry, for we are exterminating [in the Jew] the bearer of universal ethics and innocence.”
    No less!
    With this mindset of absolute innocence Jews cannot conceive bearing any responsibility for their atrocities. Jews are only victims, only “scapegoats” in an evil and hostile world. But very soon the Messiah will punish the “wicked” and will restore the victimized sons of Israel to their full rights.
    Nevertheless, in this same Israel magazine editorial, a certain Frederick Stroussi asserted that the Nazi government was worse than the Stalin regime. He quoted the cruelties he claimed were perpetrated by certain SS men. For example, we learn from Stroussi that the Latvian SS man Cukur’s hobby was to toss Jewish babies in the air to shoot them in their head as in skeet shooting. He also writes of other episodes, such as the rape of children by the SS before they killed them. The Second World War has certainly stimulated the fertile imagination of the children of Israel.
    Or perhaps this imagination is once again a case of the Jews’ own “projection” syndrome that is, accusing others systematically of one’s very own crimes as a matter of consistent PR policy: always attack. We know in fact – even if the media never speak about it – that many Jews and their rabbis are involved in the felony crime of pedophilia (see Psychanalyse du Judaisme, 2007).
    And murdering a child would seem to be more a Jewish specialty than a characteristic of the SS mind. The revelations of tenured professor Ariel Toaff of Bar Eilan University in Israel – the son of the former Grand Rabbi of Rome – and buttressed in February 2007 by his 147-page, heavily footnoted, scholarly work Pasqua di Sangue [ Blood Passover] – reveals proof of ritual murder among some Ashkenazi Jews (Jews of Eastern European origin).
    We outsiders are thus supposed to understand that the sufferings of Jews cannot be compared to those of any others. As a consequence, we are supposed to get as indignant as they do when a serious historian such as Stephane Courtois states (in the preface of his famous Black Book of Communism):
    “The death of a Ukrainian child of Kulak origin [ from the independent farmer class] who is deliberately forced to starve to death by the Stalinist government is as significant as the death of a Jewish child in the Warsaw ghetto.” These simple words were enough to provoke the ire of Frederic Stroussi who declares he was “stunned” by such an affront. Such a remark, according to him, was “despicable” and represented a vulgar attack against Israel: “What does this comparison have to do here?” he writes. “Why do we have to use the slaughter of a Jewish child to transmit this underlying, false and hateful rumor that the Jews overshadow all other victims of totalitarianism and monopolize all the attention on themselves?”
    The author of the article, as we can notice, reacts in a outraged and totally disproportionate way to the modest and certainly justified intentions of the level-headed historian Stephane Courtois. Stroussi demonstrates here the “great intolerance to the frustration” which are so characteristic of the Jewish intellectual. Such reactions are clearly not “normal.”
    We note that Israel magazine is a monthly magazine designed for the Jewish community and that, consequently, one can hardly accuse Frederick Sroussi of lying to goyish readers, or hiding from the goyim the true nature of Bolshevism and the supposedly malefic cruelty of the SS. His discourse here does not correspond to any false dialectic, as anti-Semites claim, but here, in this magazine by and for Jews, he is reflecting, as a Jew among Jews, writing to Jews, the very essence of their soul:
    (1) We are always innocent – and (2) Jewish lives are more valuable than those of others.
    There is an “attack anti-Semitism” that stems from a failure to understand the Jewish identity and only sees deliberate perfidy where there is in reality a genuine existential anxiety, one generated by a deep psychological dysfunction.
    PART 2
    The Jews have never dared to collectively approach the mirror on their inner lives represented by Freudian psychoanalysis, a prism through which the Jews claim to see all humanity, but which, on closer analysis, sheds far more light on the specific neuroses of Judaism. Psychoanalysis, like Marxism, is a “Jewish science” and a product of the Jewish mind. It was therefore logical to wonder how this Freudian “discovery” corresponds to Jewish specificities.
    The answer was not initially obvious to the author, and it took the reading and analysis of hundreds of books of all kinds, mostly written by Jews themselves, for him to realize that the searing question of incest stands at the throbbing heart of the Jewish question, and not theoretically either.
    Jewish mothers do love their sons, as is well known, but outright incest is at the origin of a well-known mental illness – one that especially afflicts Jews – called “hysteria.” Incest attracted early the attentions of Freud while he was developing his theories. The parallels between Judaism and hysterical pathology are quite natural.
    Jewry is well-known for these syndromes: Hysteria, depression, introspection, amnesia, manipulation, pathological lying, ambivalent identity, prophetic deception, sexual ambiguity, and so on. Every Jewish symptom is found in hysteria.
    Freud, as a loyal Jew, merely projected the traits of a specific community onto the rest of humanity. In reality, there is no “Oedipus complex” but rather an Israel complex (all Jews together technically being Israel, not just the Near Eastern state). In fact, Jews do not seem to really wish to discuss the topic of incest within their families. On the other hand, all the psychiatrists mention:
    “The hysterical woman so much wants a child from her father or her doctor that she can persuade herself that she is pregnant by one of them and thus develops a ‘nervous pregnancy.’”
    It is interesting that all Jewish writers use the same term to refer to the coming of their Messiah, namely, the “delivery” of the Messiah. The whole Jewish community, we must understand, is “the wife of God” (the Shekhinah of the Kabbalist) who is some day supposed to give birth to the Messiah, and thus the whole of Jewry is indeed suffering from a “nervous pregnancy” not unlike that found in nervous, hysterical women.
    Karl Kraus, the Austrian Jewish journalist who did not agree with Freud, wrote sarcastically:
    “Psychoanalysis is the mental illness of which it claims to be the cure.”
    But the right and the best formula can be stated in ten words:
    “Judaism is the disease that psychoanalysis is meant to cure.”
    After Freud, other Jewish thinkers came along who produced a symbiosis between Freudian doctrine and Marxism. Wilhelm Reich and Herbert Marcuse preached sexual revolution in order to break down the patriarchal family and unleash “free sex.” Their theories largely inspired the student riots of May ‘68. The 1970s saw a new wave of Freudo-Marxism and Jewish women were in the forefront (such as Gisele Halimi and Elisabeth Badinter in France and Bella Abzug, Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem in the USA). As time passed, a series of Jewish-inspired laws appeared, one after the other, designed to dissolve the family. In France, a Neuwirth-promoted law legalized the contraceptive pill (1967), then came the challenge to the authority of the father as head of the household (1970), then divorce by mutual consent (1974) and the “right” to abortion promoted by “Holocaust survivor” Simone Veil (1975). A great wave of movie porn accompanied this “liberation” from traditional family values. Here we are compelled to note that Jewish producers and film directors play a very important role in the sex film industry. (See my La Mafia Juive [The Jewish Mafia], 400 pages, 2008). Parallel to this, the Freudian concept of bisexuality favored the acceptance of overt “gay pride” and homosexuality.
    In fact, the only tangible results of this moral “liberation” was the systematic demoralization and criminalization of the white man, who is denounced tirelessly in movies, literature and history as the cause of all the planet’s ills and of the collapse of the West. The appeal of egalitarianism – as intended by Jewry – tends to level all ethnic differences and identities and brings about their slow destruction.
    Yitzhak Attia, director of French-language seminars at the Yad Vashem Holocaust institute in Tel Aviv wrote this himself in the same issue of Israel magazine:
    Even if reason tells us, even shouts with all its force the very absurdity of this confrontation between the small and insignificant people of Israel [i.e, all Jewry worldwide, not just “the State of Israel”] and the rest of humanity… as absurd, as incoherent and as monstrous as it may seem, we are engaged in close combat between Israel and the Nations – and it can only be genocidal and total because it is about our and their identities.
    You read it right: Between the Jewish people and the rest of humanity the struggle can only be “genocidal and total.” The “peace” which Israel intends to confer is no more and no less than “genocide,” the warrant for the execution of all humanity – except for those allowed to live as cultureless slaves.
    The question is whether the aggressiveness of Judaism can be neutralized in order to save humanity from its evils, evils that could prove even more serious than Marxism such as psychoanalysis and the ideology of globalism. First of all, we must face the facts:
    After all these centuries of mutual misunderstanding, the anti-Semitic Christians, the Muslims, and Hitler have all failed to resolve the Jewish question. The fact is that the Jews feed on and grow off the hatred they have engendered among all the peoples of this world. This hatred, it must be said, is vital for their survival and for their spiritual genetics. It has allowed them for many centuries now to close ranks within their community against an external enemy, while other civilizations have disappeared.
    For their part, the rabbis spare no efforts to keep their gene pool Jewish. And so even a renegade Jew remains a Jew, and therefore it is perfectly useless to attempt to leave the Jewish prison community. Judaism is indeed a prison. Claiming that a Jew cannot ever stop being Jewish works in favor of Jewry’s survival.
    Our mission must be to accommodate these sick among us, because the Jews are not “perfidious” people as much as they are sick people to be cured.
    Jews are to be loved individually and sincerely in order to free them from the prison in which they are locked. Only then will they become free from the cult’s grip – and from the threat they pose to themselves and to all humanity.
    Only then we will become free from this grip, and at the same time, they will free themselves from the evil inside them that threatens all mankind.

  7. There is nothing known as a racially pure Jew today , Prophet Erza long ago called them who married outside their community as ‘Cut off”, if then, today there are no pure Jews & all that Endogamy talk is nonsense even deceiving. For a look at the jews in Israel clearly show that they have not any indigenous characters of ole; but heavily mixed. As for racism they are as much racist as with anybody else & all that semetic talk is but pep , what more deceit can one expect of ones led by the devil through freemasonry, such that the term Anti sodomite is now been equated to being Anti Semetic. All this but shows the biblical Israel of God are but Spiritual Israel for the Covenant which commenced in the Physical is come in the Spiritual in the continuation, for God is spirit. For the Israel of God to His inheritance, are children of Abraham by Faith,. in Christ Jesus, & in this is no Jew or Gentile, for the God is the God of heaven & earth & is a Righteous God & there is no other beside Him & woe unto them who try to manipulate life even by Talmudism, Kabbalism or Hollywood or those hoods.

  8. Further to my previous comment about trolls and shills spreading “counter-conspiracy theory” about the Jesuits/ the Vatican/Knights of Malta etc – I notice the “WASP/Seany” character I mentioned above is now turning up on mainstream blogs under various pseudonyms. His method is the age old one of the anti-Catholic Zio-masons – accuse your enemy of what you do yourself – thus he accuses all who disagree with his disinfo of being “Vatican agents”. When I asked him how he found the time to post so much stuff (and the amount is truly staggering – it’s amazing he has time even for toilet breaks) he at first tried to ignore the question but after I repeated it a couple of times he said he made money from affiliate web-sites. He also let it slip that his father worked for British intelligence!!! All of this may sound rather inconsequential, but as an Irishman I can testify that this type of diversionary propaganda is a crucial tool, perhaps the crucial tool, of the NWO. For instance in Ireland the anti-Catholic state class’s habitual gambit is to constantly talk up the “power of Catholic secret societies” (an absurd oxymoron I know) such as the Knights of Columbanus, Opus Dei and so on, to gull the unthinking “well-informed” into believing that if there is a conspiracy it’s a Catholic conspiracy. Needless to say the idea that the Church has any temporal power in modern Ireland whatsoever is a joke. Unfortunately it never occurs to most Irish Catholics (including even SSPX Traditional Catholics) to turn the tables and talk about the anti-Catholic secret societies that are the real occult wielders of power in Ireland – and elsewhere.

    1. The Jesuit theorist shills are a dedicated bunch. There can’t be many of them, but the few that there are have an obsessive desire to promote their crap. They just confuse everyone and throw them off the trail of the true conspirators.

  9. Very true. Apologies for returning yet again to this WASP/Seany shill but on a British Sunday newspaper blog other contributors have noticed that he uses a wide variety of pseudonyms – yet the core disinfo is always the same – “the Jesuits”, “Georgetown”, “Knights of Malta” blah blah blah. The giveaway that he is a full time shill and disinfo agent, and not just a paranoid Protestant bigot is that he adopts different ideological personas for different aliases. Thus under one moniker he will incessantly spout off about angelic visitations and quote the Bible and altogether try to come across as Protestant fundamentalist ultra-zealot. In another he’s far more sober and matter of fact, and quotes copiously from mainstream secular corporate media sources such as Time and Daniel Goldhagen. In yet another he stresses not only anti-Catholicism but also anti-Islam and support for Israel. On secular alternativist anti-NWO sites he scarcely mentions Protestantism and seriously tones down the pro-Israel stuff – confining himself to saying that Zionism is not really the conspiracy – it’s the Vatican and the Jesuits. But as I say there’s no doubt he’s the same guy in all these guises because the style is always the same, as is the basic anti-Catholic content. In fact in response to repeated questions he tacitly admitted that he was WASP/Seany – though he later tried to retract this admission – saying that there were “many highly motivated” opponents of “the Vatican conspiracy” on the net, and that this explained the remarkable similarity between his stuff and theirs. Yeah right.

    1. I noticed that one of these shills consistently uses incorrect grammar. He will say something like, “the NWO is ran by the Jesuits.” Should be “run”, right? Maybe look for this pattern. I tend to agree with you. It could be just one guy behind most or all of these memes. But he has to be a paid shill, because, as you pointed out, he hardly stops for a bathroom break.

  10. Re Jesuit counter-conspiracy stuff – there have been a couple of articles in recent days on Makow attempting quite ridiculously to link the Dalai Lama and Tibetan Buddhism to – you guessed it – the Catholic Church and the Jesuits! Not 100 per cent sure if the author is the guy I reffed previously, i.e., “Seany/WASP” but it wouldn’t surprise me if he was. It’s definitely someone mining the same Jesuit/Vatican seam for all it’s worth. By the way someone I definitely think IS Seany/WASP turned up on a British blog the other day defending the high moral standards of the USSR and the East Bloc. A funny thing about these alleged Christian fundamentalist anti-papists on the net – scratch the surface and they tend to exhibit quite a lot of sympathy for atheistic communist regimes – I wonder why that might be…

    1. A disinfo agent using the handle CaliberHitter may be one of the masterminds behind the Jesuit meme. Looks like he also invented the “Alex Jones is Bill Hicks” meme to throw off truthers.

  11. Interesting. Just now before I came to your site I came across some basic but fairly compelling evidence that anti-Jesuit shills are being protected (and doubtless promoted) by Big Media. As I’ve noted here before, there’s a scumbag that shills on the Jesuit/Georgetown/Knights of Malta meme (he may well be this guy “Caliberhitter) under a huge variety of aliases. He’s very active at the moment on Peter Hitchens blog, where he calls himself many things, but mostly “Sid”. Hitchens, as I’m sure you know, is the brother of anti-Catholic bigot and latter day neocon mouthpiece, Christopher Hitchens. Unlike his brother, Peter Hitchens is what some might call a paleo-con, in the sense that he opposed the Iraq War, the bombing of Libya, Syria, and so on, from a conservative, rather than a leftist, perspective. He is however quite supportive of Israel and very critical of what he calls “Judaeophobia”. He’s also something of a self-styled Protestant zealot – which of course usually, though not always, comes with Zionist trimmings. Anyway to cut a long story short, Hitchens has today admitted to “culling” comments from his site that refute the many lies of “Sid” – such as that Ben Bernanke and Alan Greenspan are Catholics (I kid you not). Hitchens says he’s doing this to combat the danger of his site being taken over by “religious bores”, but as many contributors to his blog have previously pointed out, the only real religious bore on the site is Sid. Not to mention the fact that many of his comments are blasphemous, as well as dishonest and hate-filled – yet mysteriously Hitchens continues to allow him to spout his disinfo, all the while railing against other much more civilised contributors who happen to take issue with Sid. Bear in mind also that Hitchens’ site is pre-moderated, so he had to go to the trouble of taking down anti-Sid comments that had already been posted. For me this is prima facie evidence that anti-Catholic pseudo conpiracist shills are being actively fostered in the corporate media, both to whip up hatred against the Church and to divert attention away from the real conspiracy. It’s also evidence that “paleocons” such as Hitchens, RJ Stove and the The American Conservative crowd are not to be trusted – they value their role as “respected voices on the dissenting right” too much to ever want to tell the full truth. Personally I find Stove a particularly dodgy character – his “Traditional Catholicism” seems to me to be of a pronounced Whiggish Anglophile Hibernophobic variety – and he’s never done spitting bile against 9/11 truthers and the Kennedy clan. I consider myself a traditionalist Catholic, but I think it would be utterly naïve to assume that the Traditionalist Catholic movement hasn’t been infiltrated in the same way that the liberal and conservative wings of the Church have been. The only questions are the extent of such infiltration, and the identity of the infiltrators.

    1. It seems that many shills are mentally unstable, which seems to help them compartmentalize their shilling activities, making it difficult to detect if they are deliberate shills or not. It’s all very confusing, but there are some definite patterns emerging.

    2. Peter Hitchens like, his late brother is partly Jewish. He used to be the editor of “The Daily Express”, which is owned by Jewish pornographer, Richard Desmond. Being a big cheese in the British Mainstream Media, he is bound to uphold the Jewish/Zionist narrative. His personal interests are entirely connected to the British Rothschild Establishment.

  12. Mary Louise: He now writes for the Mail on Sunday – the online version of which has to be seen to be believed in terms of its soft porn content. I agree with your analysis. Hitchens is a little bit more even-handed on things like Gaza than most of the msm, but even here he tends to couch his criticism of Israel’s actions in Zionist logic – e.g., the onslaught on Gaza is bad for Israel and counter-productive. Some mention, but not much, of the suffering and death inflicted on Palestinians – a term he refuses to use by the way, preferring to call them “Arabs” – thereby implying that there never was a Palestinian nation. My own suspicion, although I’ve no hard evidence to support it, is that his brother was either blackmailed or bribed, or both, into becoming a neocon cheerleader. I was never a fan of the man, but he did oppose the first gulf war in 1990-1991, and while that was also a deeply immoral war, it was superficially easier to defend than the 2003 Iraq invasion. So the natural question is: what prompted Christopher Hitchens to change his mind so very dramatically? I’ve noticed this pattern again and again – journalists who had previously been quite sceptical about Israel and the neocon agenda suddenly becoming rabid advocates for both.

  13. The mental illness thing is interesting – the anti-Jesuit shill I reffed previously often refers to angelic visitations he claims to have received, and says he wants to marry a woman who will agree never to have sex, because he finds the whole business of procreation disgustingly animalistic – and loads of other equally eccentric stuff. He may well be mentally unstable, but my own hunch is that the eccentricity may well be an ingenious method of avoiding being called out on his many deliberate lies – the logic being that no serious and informed person will bother challenging such an obvious headbanger.

  14. Well he predicted 911. Based on what prior knowledge could he possibly have of that. He may at one time been on the right side, but its obvious that he has been bribed in some way or another. He hardly mentions September 11 anymore. Its about time for the American people to start killing these
    assholes. Heavily arm yourself go into wall street and let them have it.

  15. You’re labeling people you are “anti Catholic” as zionists? Since when did hislop become a Zionist? Also Edward Hendrie is most likely a Jesuit anyway. He claims that Jesuits are crypto Jews, and that Jews have taken over the Vatican. What this does is take people’s eyes off the fact that it is the papacy that is the biblical anitchrist. This has been known and preached the world over before the invention of Jesuit fururism. Also he graduated from Jesuit notre dame university. Your “blog” is so full of misinfo and rewriting of history, it’s rather amusing to read. It should be called the misinfo informer LOL.

    1. In fact Biblical reveals that the Beast , Babylon its divisions , ths whore that rides it & what is spritually called ‘Sodom & Egypt’ is any thing other than the Catholic Church. That old story that you Quote comes out of the Protestant rebellion egged on by the Zionists
      A typical instance where the accuser is the accused. Moreover where does today’s Sodom & its agendas come out from ? A people came out from Egypt but Egypt not come out from them & it was that same Egypt that killed Christ, to the Prophecy even to this day.

Leave a Reply to NorthsiderCancel reply