Please or Register to create posts and topics.

Random Thoughts 2

With all the commotion over the Charlie Kirk Association I thought I should set the record straight:

Charlie Kirk was a Kosherservative gatekeeper. He was closely aligned with the Koch Brothers and Ben shapiro-inc.

What is a gatekeeper?

A gatekeeper is someone who subverts a movement by withholding or or manipulating certain truths so that his follower base comes to faulty conclusions and makes bad decisions. A gatekeeper does this because he works for the side he claims he opposes. This is a fancy way of saying a gatekeeper is a traitor.

Treason is the worst crime, and the punishment for treason is death.

Did Charlie Kirk deserve to die then?

Well that depends on how morally culpable he was. Was he a closet communist fully aware of his gatekeeping scam? Did he willingly give himself over to his Judeo-Bolshevik masters in exchange for fame and fortune? - then yes

Or was he a bright kid who caught a big break and turned a blind eye to a some things because he became rich, had a family, and made a lot of great Jewish friends? Maybe he told himself he would eventually break free of supporting Israel one day, but that his movement was doing too much good for the conservative cause? - then no

But who can speak to Charlie Kirks interior forum? This is why we must never be too quick to judge. I don't see why anyone would care what Kirk ever said one way or the other. Once someone is established as a gatekeeper their word is worthless - I'd rather hear the opinions of a homeless man, at least their speaking from the heart.

Does any of this mean he should have been shot? Of course not.

There are two aspects to crime: one is the personal injury against the victim, and the other is to society writ large. This is why in a criminal case the case is referred to as "The People" vs. (the defendant). It's because crime committed in a society affects everyone in the society as a whole even though there may be only one victim. So for instance if someone robs a store it is a crime against everyone because everyone's ability to feel safe while shopping has been violated. Likewise shooting someone for giving a speech has a severe chilling effect on our cherished right to speak freely.

Furthermore this murder being extra judicious never gave Kirk the chance to: confront his accuser, to defend himself, to repent, to receive last rights. He was shot and then went straight to judgement without time for much of a thought.

 

It took a couple of days, but the Kremlin bot army of influencers has been given the party line: Israel killed Kirk. Of course there is no actual evidence, just whispers of hearsay behind closed doors. The lie goes something like Kirk was having private conversations to his Jewish handlers and was about to come out as a gazatard/anti-zionist, that's why they killed him-OK. But you know if Kirk was ever to be respected he could just say what he thought right? He had his own show. Nobody could stop him from speaking his mind. He never did break with Israel. So if we're going to make up wild conspiracy theories here's mine:

 

Speaking of gazatards: everyone is calling it a genocide, but a genocide is planned operation to exterminate a particular culture or ethnic group. There's nothing about Gaza which makes it distinct from any other Arab slum. Furthermore as much as we should not like Israel, we need to understand their strategy with Gaza. Basically Israel is in a bind, they have a huge population of worthless violent Muslims they have to take care of on the Gaza strip. These muslims periodically chimp out. Since no one else wants these Muslims the only thing Israel can really do is make the consequences of chimping out as painful as possible to discourage it from happening again. Its a bad situation all around, but one can't really help but think they both deserve each other.

The one thing that gets lost in all this anti-zionism is that when Gaza sand-pajeets come over to the west they all serve as footsoldiers for international Jewry. They demand: welfare, affirmative action, more refugees, more government, they take over towns and cause crime, they all vote democrat, and they never shut up about gaza. Just show me one Palestinian who will say something close to this quote:

"I want to thank America for its incredible generosity, for America by letting me come and dwell amongst its people has saved me from Jewish oppression. It is the least I can do to work hard and to support the white conservative Christian heritage that has made this country so great. It is especially important that Just as the Jews have invaded my homeland and made my a stranger in my own country so to do they seek to disinherit Americans from their lands. This is why as a new American I support deporting all illegal immigrants, ending welfare, and net negative immigration. Because just as America has shown its love for me by letting me escape the oppression of the jews, so too do I show solidarity with America" - Said no Palestinian ever.

I still hope to write a book on a general Catholic political theory, but I haven't gotten any feedback from the introduction I wrote so I am letting my ideas marinade for now.

 

 

Timothy Fitzpatrick and joshf731 have reacted to this post.
Timothy Fitzpatrickjoshf731

Excellent analysis here, Ryan. I posted this on X. 😉

Definitely Kremlin/Bejing bots pushing the Israel angle. For some reason, Nick Fuentes took our take on it. Not sure why that is.

Haven’t had a chance to read the opening to your potential book yet but will eventually. 😉

Thanks Tim! I have a confession I still lurk around X from time to time.