Hammer and sickle as an object in a conspiracy theory
July 3, 2009
Let us be chased by temporary damageInto the darkness, into the cold, into defeats, into hunger:
No, it's not by chance that the new coat of arms
Burned over the world - Sickle and Hammer!We will sow the earth again with work,
The sword of the enemies will be split again:
It's not for nothing that we, shining with a sickle,
They took a powerful hammer together.But boldly, thought, on such days,
Fly over the edge, into the planetary cold!
Universal sickle, having seated the truth,
Thick of the secrets of the fraction, universal hammer!The world has lived for a long time! Enough lies!
Like in autumn, the fruit is ripe gold.
Put us in a single sheaf, sickle,
In a single base, hammer us!
But forever with the light of the vesny willows
The human spirit is fresh and young!
Points for a new harvest sickle,
Keep the hammer for the new battle!
The hammer and sickle is a symbol of the union of workers and peasants and the Soviet state emblem. Together with the red star, the hammer and sickle appeared on the flag of the USSR in 1923, and in 1924 the symbol was registered in the constitution. All this is known to both old and young, but do we know what these symbols mean to those with hidden knowledge? And another question, do I need to know this? My opinion is that we should know everything. And it's quite another matter what we will develop to treat such knowledge.But before going deeper, let's remember how this symbol appeared on our banner.
... how many people know the history of the birth of this emblem?
One modern artist needed to depict with symbols the state concept invented by Count Uvarov: Orthodoxy, autocracy, nationality. The creator complains: "Orthodoxy is a cross, autocracy is a crown. And the nationality - what? No, it turns out that there is such a symbol in Russian history! Well, not a paw or a soha! If only - a sickle and a hammer... But it's from another, unorthodox, non-autocratic time!"
Paradoxically, for the first time only in the Soviet period of Russian history, a symbol of the union of peasants and workers - the people as such - was created. And whispers like the fact that Masons-stonemasons introduced it into the coat of arms of the RSFSR and the USSR are completely excluded when you find out that the artist of the Zamoskvoretsky Theater of the Council of Workers' and Peasants' Deputies first painted it on a red cloth, 30-year-old Evgeny Kamzolkin, the great-grandson of a serf peasant, an Orthodox, did not hide what he did. Isn't that why the symbol created by enlightenment - a hammer applied perpendicularly to the sickle - is also a cross?! Not everyone noticed him, but he was accepted with his heart, soul, on a subconscious level! As well as the banner of red, scarlet color, under which the ancient Russians fought!
The moment of birth of the symbol - the eve of the celebration of May Day 1918 in Moscow - is described by Sergei Gerasimov, the author of the famous canvas "Mother of the Partisan": "Yevgeny Kamzolkin, standing next to me, thinking, said:
- What if we try such symbolism? - At the same time, he began to walk on the canvas. - To depict a sickle like this - it will be the peasantry, and inside the hammer - it will be the working class.
The symbol of the bow of workers and peasants was sent from Zamoskvorechye to the Moscow Council on the same day - and all other sketches were rejected: a hammer with an anvil, a plow with a sword, a scythe with a wrench...
Artists A. brought the sickle and hammer to the state emblem of the RSFSR with such, savingly crossed, are the same. N. Leo and N. A. Andreev, and then on the state emblem of the USSR - artist I. I. Dubasov.
Unfortunately, the name of the author of the symbol was soon forgotten. Only by the 30th anniversary of the Great October in 1947, curious journalists found him in the city of Pushkino near Moscow in a modest log house with birches under the window. "Of course, I considered this emblem only as related to the decoration of the May Day holiday," Evgeny Ivanovich explained. "I didn't even think that later the emblem would be included in our state emblem as a symbol of people's power..."
Conspiracy theorists see the history of the symbol's creation from a different point of view. There is quite an interesting and informative conspiracy site. Although it is wrong to use the word conspiracy theorist in relation to the creator of the site. Conspiracy theorists claim the existence of a secret society (organization of people), whose members seek to subjugate the world and create a new order in which they will rule undividedly. The creators of this site call themselves differently - Iverologists. They believe that Jews (Ebers, Ibers) were created by aliens, and the whole human history is a process of influence of Jews on other peoples. This process is studied by Iverologists. That is, the world that we know is the world order imposed on us by strangers. I don't undertake to condemn or support Iverologists. I want to consider their hypothesis of the origin of the sickle and hammer in communist symbolism.
Here's how Iverologists think:
I'll show you now the cover of a Jewish book that I photocopied in the library of the Jewish hospital. The book "Jewish Dietary Laws" is called by the author. Seymour Siegel. 1966. You will see the name in English. This book is about kosher. But in this case, we are not interested in the content of the book. We are interested in its cover! On this cover, the background consists of some letters of the Hebrew alphabet. You see the middle row with the Hebrew letter. This is the Hebrew word "Kosher". The letter is called in the middle. "Tire", that is, corresponds to the Russian letter "SH". - DO YOU SEE A GRAPHIC IMAGE OF WHAT IN FRONT OF YOU? - PROLETARIAN "SICLE AND HAMMER!" AND THE LETTER "SHIN" MEANS THE HEBREW WORD "SHADDAI" - MEANING "ALMIGHTY GOD" "Shaddai", meaning "Almighty [God]." - This is an illustration of the fact, Watson, that you live in a coded world and do not know about it. Look at the graphic explanations from this site and you will understand everything yourself.I will allow myself to doubt the fidelity of this idea. And with this essay I appeal to Iberologists to point out to them that they can be wrong. And in the end, I will point out why they are probably wrong, if you look at this issue from the point of view of a man of work (earthling).
I want to express the main idea right away. Even if we assume that if the Jews were directly involved in the creation of Bolshevik symbols, it is not a fact that what they tried to contribute remained with them. I repeat, if such a thing can be allowed, history is silent about it. Nevertheless, the initially quite common Trotskyist "goat" inverted pentagram was turned into a "human" likeness as the communist regime was established. (Trotskyist, at the same time, I call the star conditionally, in view of the use of it in party and state life mainly after the revolution and during the civil war. A typical example of what can be seen on the Order of the Red Banner, established in 1918.) And the same sickle and hammer has undergone many of its transformations before becoming today's stylization. In the 20s and 1930s, different combinations of these heraldic symbols were not uncommon. More often crossed, but there was also a separate, symmetrical image of a sickle and a hammer. The hammer was depicted both as a blacksmith (with a bevel) and a bricklayer's hammer (without it). Why, by the way, there were references to the fact that this symbol of Freemasonry (from the French franc-maçon, the literal translation of this name is free mason), where the hammer, as you know, the attribute of the master of the lodge symbolizes the creative mind.
By the way, it is interesting how the view of Iverologists on the origin of the sickle and hammer echoes the medieval representations of the pentagram in occultism.
Is it possible to read these symbols from other positions? Reading, for example, them as symbols of another script. Take a look at the Wikipedia article Bulgarian Runes. The text is an illustration posted by the user Volkgar.
If you look at the 107th position in the table, you will see that it is more like the generally accepted stylization of the sickle and hammer in communist symbols. Except that it's mirrored upside down. At the same time, if it were necessary to trace the kinship of the rune and the emblem, I would compare such mirroring with the different spelling of the letter and sound 'E' in Slavic alphabets (E - Ukrainian letter, E - Russian).
Why not? If you can read the emblem in the Semitic language, why can't you read the same symbol in the Proto-Bulgarian script? At the same time, the Soviet emblem of the five-pointed star above the crossed sickle and hammer can be considered as a runic inscription not only for the Proto-Bulgarians. After all, it is known that there was also Proto-Slavic runic writing and Slavic. It is quite possible that these same runes were in our no longer runic, but still non-alphabets. And it is quite possible that they were deciphered similarly, because in those days Vedic knowledge was common to different peoples. And such a transcript would be much more appropriate if we take into account that:
- Communist symbolism was at the peak of its formation in the world under the Jews-fighter Stalin.
- The driving force of the communist idea was Russian passion and the Russian word.
- Communism does not accept Zionism, like any other anti-human idea.
I will clarify the latter, recalling the accusations of anti-humanity of the communist idea itself. I believe that any idea can be used against a person, just as any information can be used for evil. Therefore, the consideration of the declared aspirations of the idea should be fundamental in the analysis of such an issue. If communism proclaims it as its own goal. And in it (communism) everything exists for a person, then this is his first characteristic. Let's say, if we draw parallels in this with Christianity, then at first glance, there is a similarity - there are also proclaimed at the end of heavenly bushes for a person. After a certain lustration (Judgment Day), the Kingdom of God will be established on Earth as in heaven. Roughly speaking, direct divine control. I kind of know who and what a person is. Well, I'm not sure how God will behave. And in general, if you continue to study Christianity, you will also need to mention the servants of God's angels. Who will vouch for the behavior of the winged? And who guarantees that the "grays" did not work in their office and work? And these are simple consequences from a simple analysis. At the same time, do they call for evil in Christianity? - No, on the contrary. Do they call for evil in communism? - No, they don't call. Nevertheless, both doctrines and the other have been used for evil at different stages of their history. And they are used. (And will be used by skillful manipulators.) The only thing that matters is how it all ends.
I'll go back to the star, the sickle and the hammer. Unfortunately, I don't know how to decipher the communist emblem from runic inscriptions. I can only assume that the pentagram can mean a man God. That is, in its usual sense for different cultures - a spirit immersed in a material body.
In the Proto-Bulgarian runic script, the rune Sickle and Hammer (122) is very similar to the drawing of the KH rune (35). It is quite possible that they had a close meaning. P. Dobrev in the book "Inscriptions and the Proto-Bulgar Alphabet" deciphers this rune in different inscriptions. Such as KH AN O T E S - Khan-father. (Where AN, according to P. Dobrev, means heaven or paradise). And also AN E KH N ESH - Holy Oath. On the face of the use of this sound and rune in the word formation of "special" words. It makes no sense to draw parallels in sound with Slavic words, because you need to know their corresponding runic drawing, so we will not. It should only be mentioned that the mutual influence of the Proto-Slavic and Proto-Bulgarian cultures is great.
Again, I am sure that Iberologists will want to assume the influence on the Proto-Bulgarians and Proto-Slavs from the Khazars, who were directly dependent on the Jews-settlers, (if not by them). Which, in turn, should allegedly prove that the Hebrew Shin could have become a Proto-Bulgarian Sickle and Hammer. I assume that it was rather the other way around. And much earlier. Rather, in our ancient writing, both Proto-Bulgarian, and Semitic, this symbol appeared from earlier writing. And yes, it could mean the same thing. It is also important to mention that Russian, like Proto-Bulgarian, belongs to the Indo-European macro-family of languages. At the same time, the modern Russian language is the closest relative of Sanskrit, which is more than 3.5 thousand years old. While Semitic languages belong to the Afro-Asian macro-family and they are younger, at least, according to the data known today. Not a fact, but yes, Semitic writing could influence other people's writings. At the same time, it is not a fact that they did not receive this writing from even earlier ones.
After all of the above, there are more questions than answers. But it was much more correct than to keep silent and continue to PR the Semites. Created by the ancient Egyptian priesthood, the Jews carry the task of serving God through the centuries. Given what they are doing, it can be assumed that their God is going to arrange a single secular rule for the whole Earth. Let's omit the characteristic bad or good. And let's remember the facts known today. Yahweh is not only God for the Jews, but also the one god for all people. Unless it can be called differently. And this is not contradicted by the supposedly sepaning Christian religion, not a close relative of Islam. Even the ancient Vedic monotheistic religion broadcasts about the Gods as various incarnations of the One God. It is not known for sure whether there is a single god on the American continents or pre-Buddhist China. But the conclusion is that there have always been Gods who recognize the authority of God above.
Let's get back to the decoding. Iverologists noticed the similarity of sickle and hammer with the Hebrew letter Shin (ש). It would not be superfluous to mention that the Hebrew letter Shin came from the Phoenician letter Sin (W). In addition, it is believed that the Phoenician writing became the ancestor of most modern writing systems. It is also known that in antiquity Phoenician writing could be used when writing any languages of the Middle East, both Indo-European and Semitic. It is quite possible that in the Phoenician script it meant the same as in Hebrew. But I won't say that.
Returning to the Bulgarian runes and their decipherment, it is interesting that the proto-Bulgars had the sound SI meant God.
But what did it mean in Hebrew? The Iverologist writes that "AND THE LETTER "SHIN" MEANS THE HEBREW WORD "SHADDAI" - MEANING "ALMIGHTY GOD". In fact, it's not like that. Rather, Shaddai (שדי) can be translated as Almighty.
El-Shaddai is "God Almighty" in the Russian synodal translation. The root of the word "shad" denotes female breasts and is an image of motherhood, caring tenderness, feeding, quiet tranquility.
EL SHADDAI, El Shaddai (Hebrew. "God Strong") is one of the oldest names of God in the Tanakh - the Bible of Judaism, which became part of the Christian Bible. Traditionally translated as "Almighty". According to modern hypotheses, it can be understood as "God of the Mountain" ("Mountain" in the meaning of "World Mountain", "Abode of God"). See Shaddai, El, see also Tanakh. (G.V. Blue)
The basis of the name "Almighty God" is first of all El - the name used by the Semitic peoples to denote the Deity. Although the exact meaning of the name Shaddai is not quite certain, the translation of "Almighty" seems to be the most appropriate (cf. Is.13:6; Joel.1:15). The main meaning of this name is probably to oppose the power and strength of God to the weakness, vulnerability and powerlessness of man.
... and on the outside (the scroll of parchment - mezuzah - made of the skin of a pure (kosher) animal attached to the outer door jamb in the Jewish house) - the word Shaddai (שדי - `Almighty`; also interpreted as an acronym of the words "Shomer daltot Israel" - "Guarding the doors of Israel`).
In connection with the above, I would define Shaddai as someone who protects and feeds. But, probably, it's still more accurate simply - the Almighty.
Yes, there is undoubtedly a connection between writing and reading a letter in different languages. But still she's not straight. At the same time, a hint of some holiness, sacredness, if you like, divinity is more distinct if you consider more ancient languages than Hebrew. And as already mentioned above, the drawing of the modern emblem, while it is viewed much more clearly not in Hebrew at all.
Summarizing the above, I would still like to try to decipher the communist symbol of the star with a sickle and a hammer. And just like that, together, as he is depicted on the Flag of the USSR and the Banner of Victory. Deciphering, (and as we have seen from different scripts), is the simplest one - a holy man, which is expressed in his self-sufficiency for his own happiness and prosperity. At the same time, I would not focus on the God-fighting interpretation of the symbol. Rather, it is a recognition of one's divine essence, which no one has the right to deny. We are all creations of the Most God, which means that we have a certain part (degree, if you like) of divinity. And I think it's much more useful for a person to remember this than to point out to him his material (and in Christianity, in addition, sinful), nature. A man must become a man. At the same time, I want to draw attention to the fact that such an interpretation does not call into question the power of the Almighty over himself. It's just different to each. There has been no direct alie management for a long time. And we will, I hope it won't happen. It is this communist flag that proclaims human power.
Nevertheless, these are again just attempts to decrypt.
The main thing I would like to say. Even if we assume that the Jewish genome exists in parallel with the universal human one, and performs its special role, which they constantly repeat (God's election). It would be foolish to agree with this to recognize their goals and objectives that they set for themselves. We need to reject them. And Iverologists do that. But rejecting them, you should not overdo it, and with it not break the spine of all mankind. After all, the fact that the Egyptian gods created the Jews does not mean that the other gods agreed with it. So what our gods gave us can naturally coincide with what the Egyptian gods (and the ancient Egyptian priesthood) gave to the Jews. Therefore, rejecting jewism and their goals, it is foolish to reject everything that is characteristic of their creators.
