Soviet dialectics & predictive power

By Anatoliy Golitsyn
Excerpt from The Perestroika Deception, pgs. 26-27 (1998 edition)
June 14, 2019 Anno Domini

Correct understanding of the strategy and the application of that understanding to the analysis of events enables one to predict otherwise surprising Soviet actions. Since the strategy is long-range, it has several phases. The strategists plan their actions in the early phases in preparation for the final phase. They conceive Soviet reforms in the initial phase, they rehearse them in the preparatory phase and they introduce them in the final phase. Because of this planning framework, the strategy has its own dialectic. It has its thesis – the Stalinist regime: its antithesis – criticism and rejection of the Stalinist regime: and its synthesis – a new, reformed model which ‘perestroika’ is designed to create, and which will be the product of ‘convergence’ (the joining of the two opposites). Understanding the dialectic and logic of the strategy is crucial for prediction: it enables one to see how the situation in one phase will develop in the next phase.

For instance, it enables one to predict the change in the role and status of Soviet ‘dissidents’. In the initial phase, they were recruited and trained by the KGB. In the preparatory phase, they were ‘criticised’ and ‘persecuted’ by the KGB. In the final phase, they are accepted and even incorporated into ‘perestroika’. It was through understanding this dialectic that the Author was able to predict the simple fact that Sakharov ‘might be included in some capacity in government’. In the event, he became one of Gorbachev’s chief advisers.

Likewise, the dialectic enables one to understand that Euro-Communist criticism in the 1960s and 1970s of repressive practices and violations of human rights in the USSR was undertaken and tolerated with official foreknowledge of the impending ‘reform’ of the Soviet system. The fact that the Berlin Wall was built at the time when the strategy was adopted was a sufficient basis for the prediction that it would be pulled down again in the strategy’s final phase. The dialectic enables one to see through the calculated publication of anti-Soviet manuscripts abroad, Soviet condem- nation of them at the time and the present lifting of the ban on much of the ‘dissident’ writing of the 1960s and 1970s. Understanding of the dialectic enables one to provide further predictions and warnings about political and social issues which the Soviet strategists will seek to exploit in Western Europe, the United States and elsewhere.


  1. Great article here for those who have already understand the key players which majority are to busy with amusement and entertainment as Our Lady said at Lassalette , now with 5G there brains will really fry and will have no chance to take this information to Heart and understand they being set up and conned , keep going Fitz while grace is still with in you from heaven RL
    Sent from my iPad

  2. And now?
    “The image of the enemy that is being eroded has been… absolutely vital for the foreign and military policy of the United States and its allies.The destruction of this stereotype… is Gorbachev’s weapon.
    Georgiy Arbatov, former close strategic advisor to Gorbachev and member of the Politburo; in: Kommunist, 1988.
    This is what the alleged ‘end of the Cold War’ really was about: the bringing to an end of anti-Communism by deceptively creating the illusion that the Communist threat was over.
    Concomitantly, (Putin confidante) Alexander Dugin writes that the first task to gain victory over the US in the coming “Great War” is to use its vast media operations and assets in the alternative media to portray America as irredeemably evil:
    “Therefore, the first task to gain victory would be real fully-fledged company to create the entirely negative, monstrous, satanic image of the United States and the West in general. Therefore, the West is a place where the devil resides. It is the center of the global capitalist tentacles. It is the matrix of ​​rotting cultural perversion and a vice grip of falsehood and cynicism, violence and hypocrisy.
    Russia should be actively involved in the struggle for influence on the American society, strengthening the explanation of the Russian spiritual position in the war, showing that Russians and Americans have a common enemy: a manic satanic elite that have usurped power and are leading the whole humanity, including the Americans, towards the inevitable catastrophe.”
    The end-game of the ‘Perestroika Deception’ is for a WW3, where the West is characterised as the aggressor and the still extant Soviet Union (along with China) as ‘liberators’;of the West;
    Dugin again;
    ‘Russian must save Europe from the liberal elite that are destroying it.’
    This is the same stunt that the synagogue who are behind communism. pulled in WW2 when Russia was styled as ‘liberator’ of East Europe from the Nazi’s, before imposing communism on them after the war;
    Hence, in the Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed quotes Lenin from his ‘collected works’;
    “The World War (1914-1918) will see the establishment of Communism in Russia; a second world war will extend its control over Europe, and a third world war will be necessary to make it worldwide”

  3. I think you have to differentiate between dialectical reasoning itself (Hegel) and the application of dialectic to materialism (Marx).. As owners of Revolution , the Judaic Hegemon owns all powers they set up in dialectical opposition. For example, in terms of the Captialist / Communist dialectic, the Hegemon owns monopoly capitalism and its ZOGs. It owns the communist block. In one model the bank (which they own) owns the government and its apparatus as an asset. In the other model, the state monopoly socialism (which they own) owns the central bank. Now this latter model is presented as the ‘post communist’ ie globalist champions of ‘mulit-polar’ world. They are the communists in the full Marxist sense and they are the synthesis / thesis of the Cold War dialectic. I expect the Judaic Hegemon to set up nationalism (or rather warring nationalisms) as the new anti-thesis (just like they set up nationalism against the Allies for world war II). They envision the final synthesis as the Zionist world order which will emerge from the conclusion of the current world war – the consummation of which (WW III) they are at present quite busy.
    Only the social Kingship of Christ and his Church – the kingdom order for all nations – can restore the nations caught up in this war machine. Only Christ can restore His Church.

Leave a Reply