Parallels between 9/11 and Putin’s false-flag terrorist attacks in Ryazan and Volgograd
Ryazan sugar in Volgograd
By Avraham Shmulevich
October 24, 2013
"One told me... everything to cancel the Olympics for terrorist threat. They don't have time, it seems to finish it... I heard this version from a security officer when I flew to Moscow in the summer."
I remembered these words when I heard about the Volgograd terrorist attack - everything looks too much like Ryazan sugar.
Strange things are happening around the Volgograd terrorist attack. The suicide bomber's passport began to change before our eyes.
The name of the alleged suicide bomber was published in the first hours after the terrorist attack. It was officially reported that the "miraculously preserved" passport of a terrorist - a 31-year-old native of Dagestan Naida Asiyalova was found in the blown-up bus. Two hours after the terrorist attack, the first page of her passport was published on the social network Twitter on behalf of the National Anti-Terrorist Committee. Then the passport page with her photo was shown on Channel One and reprinted by all official media with the note "the suicide bomber's passport was found at the scene of the explosion".
Here it is:
Four hours after the explosion, one of the central TV channels and a number of Internet resources almost synchronously issued her detailed biography.
But at 20:16 on October 21, the blogger-LJuzer dedeg0r published Five Questions to the Strong Passport of the Suicide.
He noticed that the passport is a clear fake, and cannot belong to the terrorist who exploded.
It's absolutely intact and not damaged.
It is clear that her photo in a hijab just lies on top of a passport photo.
There are some spots on the laminated page, which by definition cannot be there. In addition, they resemble the standard photoshop picture of "coffee stains".
The next day, 22.10.2013, at 14:35, the article "Passport of a Suicide woman from Volgograd: Questions, Answers and New Photo" by the publication journalist Stanislav Eliseev was published on Slon.ru.
The passport is split.
The author provides a photo of the passport in the same name of Naida Asiyalova, with the same number, and with the same incomprehensible divorces - but with a different photo. The passport is badly shabby and torn.
Without any explanation where he got this information and a new photo of his passport, Stanislav Eliseev claims: "the first photo really has nothing to do with the document" and gives another photo of the passport while accompanying it with an incomprehensible definition: "this picture is already more like the truth".
I don't understand what it means. So we have a real passport found at the site of the explosion, which was used to identify the terrorist? Or a passport, "! who is lying on the truth" - so he is not real? And how many identical passports, with the same numbers and divorces, but with different photos, the same woman (or different ones?) be at the disposal of the FSB? Where did these passports suddenly come from and why did they suddenly break into the pages of the media? I don't understand.
But the new passport is hardly authentic either - it does not look like a document that was in a terrorist attack. The passport is simply torn and crumpled, - torn, but not burned (or burned just a little, in the upper left corner the paper is a little darker), there are no traces of blood. It seems like it was just crushed and torn for a long time.
About the first, passport, found, according to the NAK and the central TV, at the site of the explosion. Stanislav Eliseev reports: "Why was it necessary to publish such a strange fake and where did it come from in the anti-terrorist unit - it would be really interesting to know."
The photo shows two completely intact new passports lying next to a bloody woman.
The next day, there are reports in the media designed to explain the story with the passports - but it rather finally convinces that the matter here is unclean - it is so clumsy.
At 17:15 on October 22, "Komsomolskaya Pravda" publishes an article by Ekaterina MALININA. "The false passport in hijab was made by Naida Asiyalova herself. To prove commitment to Wahhabism."
Passport №1 is called a fake - whole. And under the photo of passport №2 - crumpled - it is signed: "And this is a real document of Asiyalova. Photo: IC of the Russian Federation".
The article says: "A photo of Naida Asilyalova's passport page appeared a few hours after the explosion on one of the Caucasian forums and immediately spread to all social networks and the media. But it was surprising not only that the girl was photographed in a hijab, but also that the photo was roughly pasted on top of the other. When a real scan of the document appeared, which was found at the site of the explosion, the site administrator hurried to explain it.
"The passport photo given in our article was taken on August 3, 2013 on a phone, on an iPhone 5, to be more precise. This idiot Asiyalova pasted a wrapped printout in her passport in the frenzy of Wahhabism. At the passport control, she got caught with him and this passport photo was taken there. We've had it ever since. It was stored as part of information about a woman at risk."
Everyone here raises questions: First of all, why is the passport called fake? And what was "done"? After all, it is further claimed that this is Asilyalova's real passport, and all the changes in it are only that she pasted a printout of her own photo in a hijab on top of the passport photo? The main thing is that "Komsomolsk" does not give a link to this mysterious "Caucasian forum", does not explain what kind of bloggers are those who get photos from the control of the passport regime, and then store "with them" "as part of information about a woman from the risk group".
Finally, the article also contains a direct lie: the passport was posted online by the National Anti-Terrorist Committee and reproduced by "the first TV channel - it is now called "one of the Caucasian forums"??
In 5 hours, at 22:00, October 2. An article by Dmitry BELETSKY appears on the website of Komsomolskaya Pravda. A Volgograd suicide bomber made her own passport. And this was known long before Naida Asiyalova staged a self-detonation in the bus."
The article provides surprising information. Which contradict both themselves and everything above: "Naida Asiyalova's passport was found at the site of the terrorist attack in Volgograd. An image of her more than strange documents appeared suspiciously quickly on the Internet: in a roughly glued photo - a girl in a black handkerchief covering the oval of her face.
- There are clearly two photos in the passport in the name of Naida Asiyalova, who was found at the scene of the terrorist attack, - we were told in the Federal Migration Service of the Stavropol Territory. - The image of a woman in a hijab is glued on top of another photo, the top photo is cut out crookedly."
It is absolutely impossible to understand this. That is, it turns out that passport №1 - whole and with a glued (or just attached) photo - is this the passport found at the scene of the explosion? But the same Komsomolka wrote about him five hours earlier that "The passport photo given in our article was taken on August 3, 2013 on the phone, on the iPhone 5, to be more precise. This idiot Asiyalova pasted a wrapped printout in her passport in the frenzy of Wahhabism. At the passport control, she got caught with him and this passport photo was taken there. We've had it ever since. It was stored as part of information about a woman at risk."
And what is then a passport №2 - crumpled and with one photo?
Obviously, there are some inconsistencies among comrades from the "Caucasian forums" who collect dossiers on women at risk.
Corr. "Novaya Gazeta" Irina Gordienko asks another reasonable question in her blog:
About Volgograd. I know that women who have such a detailed dossier as Asiyalova are always under close control. As soon as she "falls" for a couple of hours, the Daga MVD starts sending out orientations to all ends. And here the dossier was more than, and she left freely, and also such an incomprehension with the passport.
In an article in Novaya Gazeta, she writes: "The day after the terrorist attack, the official representative of the Investigative Committee Vladimir Markin, reporting on the progress of the investigation, in particular, said: "It was established that Asiyalova arrived in Volgograd from Makhachkala on a regular bus to Moscow." How did she manage to get on a regular bus with such a passport? I remember well how after the explosions in the Moscow metro in 2010 (both suicide bombers then came to Moscow on regular buses) the Dagestan long-distance buses tightened the verification of documents. Before sending the flight, the driver or his assistant, accompanied by a police officer, often collects the passports of all passengers for inspection. I called three bus stations in Makhachkala, from where Asiyalova could theoretically leave. All dispatchers confirmed that "passports must be collected and carefully checked before long-haul flights".
There is another strangeness with the passport, which does not climb into any gates at all.
A scan of the first publication of the passport on Twitter of the NAK appeared on the Internet, which was posted SEVEN HOURS before the terrorist attack:
Several more bloggers noticed this early publication before the terrorist attack
Sergey Ivanov @fil_prosto_fil21 Oct
Can someone explain?: the suicide bomber's photo was posted on Twitter at 7-19 a.m., the explosion occurred at 14-05 Moscow time
There are no explanations yet, and it seems that there cannot be. The time machine has hardly been invented in the FSB.
----
From the editors: Without a detailed study, it is impossible to rule out that the difference in publication time is simply related to different time zones of the Twitter server and the publisher's incorrectly configured computer.
But the very origin of two photos of different passports, the speed and channels of their appearance on the Internet, of course, allow the public to ask our law enforcement agencies extremely uncomfortable questions.
