AI is not what it's cracked up to be
"AI" is not Artificial Intelligence. There is no intelligence in Large Language Models such as Chat GPT or Gemini. They are statistical models of the internet which predict and select the next word to a prompt, then run in through a thesaurus like program. In essence they are google search algorithms which instead of websites give you sentences. In order to run a statistical analysis on the entire internet, which is at this point close to the sum of all human written work, you need a lot of computing power. That's why AI has become a multi-trillion dollar empire of super computer servers which is going to require us to like double our power grid or something crazy like that. Think bitcoin mining on steroids, but stupider.
What people are realizing now though is that AI is basically useless. It has no real productive value. the AI product is pretty much a bunch of fake BS which gets dressed up in corporate speak. I listen to people talk about AI about how its going to be so wonderful, like: "I only have a couple points on this email so I'll use AI to give me ideas to fill it out and make it sound so much better." The guy who gets the email says: "I'll use AI to summarize all the corporate speak into a few key points."
The goal has been to make humans as machine like as possible, I think that's what Kabalists mean by the Adam Kadmon thing. They do this through school, one-tracking everything, and ironically emotion based stimulus response training (turns out emotions are more machine like that rational thought, think of mechanization as pre-determined outputs to inputs). AI is another step in the process, truth is it isn't anything new, its just an algorithm, a statistical analysis program just with more compute. Like the other algorithms in our lives it denatures our humanity and makes us dumber, and more robotic. However there is good news, it can't ever be human in the way the Jewish tech oligarchs like Larry Ellison want. These people want to make humans into machines and machines into humans, its part of their inverted god-play psychology, I don't get it-its a kabala thing.
Fortunately, aside from a few niches, AI is useless. It sucks. And it appears, to me at least, that the whole AI thing is about to fall out of the sky like a lead balloon.
https://builtin.com/articles/ai-circular-financing
So I've kinda softened in my AI stance. I've seen chat GPT be able to take a document and change it into another type of document and that is pretty cool. Also I think AI is good at patterns and will definitely be used in the coming police state. The biggest use right now for AI is corporations putting cameras everywhere and making sure Mexicans follow all the compliance rules. AI is still not productive, mostly counter productive, makes you stupid, and I don't think it will ever live up to the hype.
With that said Anthropic's source code just got leaked, and it lets us pull back the curtain of what is really behind AI. Turns out its not as much as we thought, (and perhaps if some of us are right what makes a lot of AI run comes from the spiritual realm)
There are a couple of factors I want to cover with regards to the AI job loss claims.
First:
For decades we have been making work automated. The most visible industries have of course been manufacturing and industry, however automation has been the case throughout all fields. Automation most certainly applies to white collar work where policies, procedures and business climate has taken away a lot of the actual thinking. Think professional business speak, lots of meetings, the office people who are soulless, and the feeling that your decision making process has been one-tracked.
Second:
Much if not most of work is not productive. By productive I mean that it creates value. About half of people think their job shouldn't exist and everyone who works believes they spend time on things that it shouldn't be spent on. We've all seen it, the endless meeting, the approval process, side projects that go nowhere, people who just seem to exist to get in the way, pointless emails, the ingrained concept of that one guy with the shovel and his 10 managers standing around him doing nothing. . A lot of work is counter productive too, it wastes time and resources. How many times have we thought if only I didn't have to jump through all these hoops to get this approved I could do what mattered? There's many reasons for this: organizations hire people for roles that only take up a few hours a week and those people create work to make themselves busy, endless meetings, HR. Probably the most important reason is the socialist engineering and a few of its premises: we have to have most everyone's time taken up by working so that they are busy and not active with the family and politics. If they are all at work the state will raise the kids, women will be fat, unmarried, unhappy and vote for liberal socialists, we need more income to have more taxes, more loans and consumption to keep the system solvent. Unfortunately or fortunately this has run into a problem that as we become more efficient and markets are pushed to their limit (there is a max amount of consumption for most markets eg the food market, people can only eat so much) A lot of work is just make work to be busy.
Third:
The great replacement. I don't think I really need to explain this.
So taking these three things into account what is behind a lot of the supposed AI job loss, which may or may not even really exist, is that organizations have been prepped for a long time through technocracy to believe they can fully automate job processes. Then when they look into automating these processes they are realizing that many of them shouldn't even exist! And there is also a lot of firing of American workers to secretly offshore the work to India.
Now ultimately I don't believe AI will provide much value to organizations. AI doesn't think it pattern matches and so what it generates is a mimicry of the real thing. I think the real metaphysics is that if a human didn't create an intellectual work then what if any value does it have?
AI is a lot like vegetarianism
Every vegetarian tries to make vegetables seem like meat, nobody ever tried to make a steak taste like a carrot.
Every AI tries is engineered to impersonate a human, but nobody wants to interact with a machine.