By Timothy Fitzpatrick

What explains the contradictory theological and political positions of so called traditional Catholic E. Michael Jones is the dark art of Hermetic Kabbalah.

All the things his critics accuse him of being that seem to contradict the bowtie-wearing Catholic image: a Communist, modernist defender of the Second Vatican Council, Islamophile, Eurasianist, Duginist, anti-Semite, race denier, Opus Dei member, gun grabber, Kremlin asset—can all harmoniously fit together under the context of an undercover Hermetic Kabbalist within traditional Catholic circles.

Hermetic Qabalah (Kabbalah) was developed during the Renaissance under so called Catholics Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and Marsilio Ficino (see this author’s book review Pico della Mirandola the true father of Second Vatican Council, claims author). These two subversives adapted the Jewish Kabbalah, Christianized it, and claimed that it could be used by Catholics to validate the divinity of Jesus Christ. As well, they claimed Kabbalah revealed secret truths not available in Catholic Canon. But beneath their sophistry is a heretical philosophy no true Catholic would ever accept were it presented in its raw form. That is the neo-Platonic “perennial philosophy” or Prisca Theologia, which is a form of universalism or syncretism that sees core truths in all belief systems (what Jones calls the “ultimate reality”). The Catholic Church condemns this as religious indifferentism (the heretical idea that no belief is superior to another and that all beliefs are valid ways to truth or to god[s]). It seems that the goal of this syncretism, under Eastern Kabbalistic Jewish management, is to centralize all beliefs, as it did with the social and political order under Bolshevism, to usher in their false messiah. Russian-Jewish Kabbalist rabbi Mikhail Laitman, with whom Jones debated and agreed in a 2019 interview, sees the Eurasian powers ushering in a utopic Kabbalistic new age of absolute centralized power and worship, under the guise of the redemptive messianic age.

E. Michael Jones claims that he left the anti-war hippy movement of his youth (a Marxist movement) after reading a book by Catholic monk Thomas Merton, himself a seeming perennialist.^[1] Jones’ 2020 book Logos Rising: A History of Ultimate Reality is perhaps the biggest indication that the 78-year-old Indiana-based influencer falls into the perennial school and continues the centuries-old dark legacy of kabbalistic subversion of the Catholic Church begun by Pico. In his book, Jones attempts to depersonalize the unique person of Jesus Christ (God in the flesh) and turn Him into some abstract, pantheistic notion^[2] of the ordering principle of the universe—something perennialists have done for hundreds of years with their idea of “god” (see this site’s review of Logos Rising by Ryan Augustine). While it is not incorrect to refer to Jesus Christ as the Logos (or even loosely as the light) described in the Book of St. John, it is Jones’ overemphasis and overdevelopment of this theme that takes him out of a Catholic position and places him in the Hermetic camp, or at the very least a perennialist camp. St. John does not allow any kind of depersonalization of the Messiah, nor does any other book of the New Testament. The idea of a depersonalized “Logos” (the Adam Kadmon of Ein Soph, to “traditionalist” kabbalists like Jones contemporary Alexander Dugin) is central to perennialist philosophy as well as to its more advanced form of hermetic Kabbalah in Aleister Crowley’s Thelema magik and Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (Jones’ logos book happens to depict on its front cover a golden dawn, perhaps over Renaissance Florence—once home to Pico della Mirandola). Crowley’s logos (also Dugin’s “dark logos”^[3]) helps the adept to “do what though wilt”. Jones is an associate of Crowleyite Dugin, an admitted Rene Guenonian perennialist. Jones says he first met Dugin at the Kremlin-sponsored 6^th International New Horizon Conference at Mashad, Iran in 2018. Since then, the two have cross-promoted each other. Jones, who claims “I always felt that my gaze was to the East”^[4] and who prays for the end to the “American Empire, is an ardent supporter of Dugin’s Eurasianism in the form of so called “multipolar” geopolitics, which is nothing more than a repackaged form of anti-Western Soviet Communism. Anti-Zionism is his excuse for embracing this position (see Operation SIG), as the West is just a Zionist lackey state that needs to be abolished in order to achieve world peace, according to Jones. Dugin’s worldview is almost identical to Jones’ except Dugin dresses his agenda in Eastern Orthodox/Fascist garb instead of Catholic. As a side note, Dugin’s late daughter Darya once used the pseudonym surname of Platonova, in honour of Plato. Neo-Platonism lurks behind all the Kabbalah of all these perennialists, it seems.

Jones’ longtime support of the Eurasianist agenda—the idea that the rulers of the Eurasian landmass have an inherit and even messianic right to rule over the rest of the planet—fits into a perennialist worldview, where borders and races are erased to make way for the universal Soviet man (global Communism) who follows a universal religion of religions. Jones glowingly claims God is bringing about a “Eurasianist…New World Order”.^[5] This perennialism also explains, to a large degree, Jones’ absurd denial of race. If Jones were smart politically, he would back off this position, but he can’t help himself, which seems to suggest he is more than just an opportunistic perennialist. He must be an ideological subverter (and, yes, money factors in as well, as Jones allegedly is a millionaire). Then again, it could merely be his narcissism seeping through on this issue (they can never be wrong). In order to harmonize the world under centralized governance, you have to create the borderless, raceless Soviet man. Jones also isn’t very smart when he makes the implausible assertion that Communism and China were never a threat, so he relies on the ignorance of his audience (narcissists are always smarter than everyone else). Communism becomes a guarantor of his perennialist worldview, for only a collectivist society under a collectivist religion can achieve utopia. He must defend Communism, although couched in vague terms like “solidarism” and “multipolarism”, at all costs if his fellow perennialists are to reach the apex of civilization. We now know that materialistic atheism was never the ultimate goal of the Soviet system but only a step. To institute Kabbalah globally, you have to first destroy the existing order, which is Christianity. To destroy Christianity, you have to implement a temporal phase of anti-religionism but also a permanent phase of collectivism.

“Russia will become the capital of Kabbalah,” writes Laitman. “Marxism-Leninism prepared us for Kabbalah.”^[6]

Showing the Eastern Jewishness of Communism presents a problem for perennialists like Jones. This is why he completely ignores Chabad Lubavitch (the most powerful, kabbalistic, Soviet-derivec Jewish organization in the world)^[7] and instead tries to separate the two and seemingly neutralize them individually. To achieve this, Jones instills in the reader the idea that the threat of Communism is long past and was merely a “category of the mind” and that the Jewish question is really only about Zionism or Western capitalist liberal Jewry. This decouples real Jewry (based in the East) from Communism and, simultaneously, Russia from Jewry. It also leaves the door open for “dialogue” with so called anti-Zionist Jews like Neturei Karta, with whom Jones is chummy. Chabad is also arguably anti-Zionist at its core.

The reader of Jones might argue that Jones attacks Jewry at a fundamental level (namely in their rejection of Christ, which was the theme of The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History). To that I would say that it is more obfuscation, for the different schools of Judaism (Eastern Hasidism vs. Western Talmudic/Zionism) will oppose each another, even to the point of condemnation. These so called Christian Kabbalists can even say anti-Semitic things, for it is the Jew who misinterpreted the Kabbalah, not the learned like the Pico Della Mirandolas, Ficinos, and Joneses of the world. As it is, however, Jones never really goes deep in his critiques of the Talmud (which he doesn’t even mention all that much), and especially not the Kabbalah. He keeps the reader focused on Zionism and the culture warring coming from Jews of the Western Left. He keeps his audience fixated on general, simpleton issues like abortion, feminism, pornography, and war, which are easy to pin exclusively on the West using highly controlled narratives. He knows that as long as he says the word “Jew” enough, his audience will applaud him and not notice the glaring holes and contradictions in his positions or the deeper subjects he ignores. Jones dualistic relationship with Jewry corresponds with Eurasianism founder Yakov Bromberg’s dualism between Eastern Jewry’s Hasidic orientalism that he championed against Western Jewry’s Talmudic-capitalist-liberalism. Dugin seems to have merely repackaged Bromberg’s concept of a Jewish-based Eurasianism and, in turn, Jones has internalized Dugin’s Eurasianism and repackaged it in Catholic dressing. Therefore, Jones’ so-called anti-Semitism is merely selective and strategic, with kabbalistic syncretism as its goal.

Jones’ support for the obviously error-ridden Second Vatican Council appears to be another perennialist-based position. The conciliar errors are all about fostering acceptance of all faiths as equally valid; thereby, preparing the world for acceptance of the false Christ world leader. Jones must defend this robber council above all else, even if he has to attack the traditional Latin mass itself. Jones attacking sedevacantism and the SSPX is one thing, for they are technically schismatic, but for him to attack the Latin mass in general makes no sense from a Catholic point of view. What does make sense is that Jones is not actually Catholic and knows the threat the TLM poses in attempting to undo Vatican 2 prescriptions and restore the Church. The TLM strengthens the idea of one, true faith, tradition, a knowable and personal messiah, and exclusivity; therefore, Jones must deconstruct the TLM and promote the V2 mass in order to prevent any hindrance to the agenda. That’s what Vatican 2-inspired clown masses are all about—to merge Catholicism with every other belief and make a mockery of Catholicism’s uniqueness. These snakes are preparing us for the anti-Christ one-world syncretic religious system, which will accompany a form of global Communism led by Jewish orientalists.

Now that we understand that Jones’ goal is religious pluralism, we can easily understand his championing of Islam and horrendous Islamic regimes like Iran. But his Islamophilic position serves another purpose. Islam is one of the most effective instruments of direct revolutionary terrorism with which to destabilize non-Communist nations in preparation for global collectivism. Jones can declare “Allahu akbar!” with no reservations, as he did with fellow Islamic Communist Kevin Barrett, and have no problem calling himself Catholic.^[8] See this site’s index on the close association between Islam and Marxist revolutionary terrorism.

The “Catholic” cult Opus Dei was started by a man named Josemaría Escrivá, who is believed to have been a Kabbalist^[9]. Opus Dei also has connections to the Communist world, especially Communist influence networks and their operatives posing as traditional Catholics. Jones has denied being a member of this cult, but “the work”, like Freemasonry, instructs its members to obscure their membership from the public. Jones’ overrepresented associations with Opus Dei are well known.^[10]

To finish off any remaining resistance to the New World Socialist Order agenda, the right of the citizenry to bear arms must be removed. E. Michael Jones is all for this. He seems to use his Soviet-based anti-war, anti-U.S. imperialism agenda to validate being anti-gun. His audience should not be fooled by this, though. It makes no sense from a truly Catholic point of view. Jones knows that in order to create the socialist Soviet utopia, individual arms possession must be eliminated in order to create a smoother transition from the free world to absolute anti-Christ collectivism.

Notes:

1. The Engaged Contemplative Spirituality of Thomas Merton, Issue 4, 2017, Beshara Magazine – https://besharamagazine.org/metaphysics-spirituality/thomas-merton-engaged-contemplative-spirituality/ ↑
2. Augustine, Ryan, Logos Rising Book Review Chapter Notes, Oct. 3, 2023 – https://fitzinfo.net/forum/topic/logos-rising-book-review-chapter-notes/ ↑
3. Kazachkin, Andrey, Dugin’s ‘dark logos’ sponsored by Russian Orthodox Church, Jan. 6, 2023 – https://fitzinfo.net/forum/topic/dugins-dark-logos-sponsored-by-russian-orthodox-church/ ↑
4. “I never had that identification with America. I always felt that my gaze was to the East.” —E. Michael Jones (54:07 mark-Guillermo Vásquez Interviews E. Michael Jones: What Is Identity?) – https://player.fm/series/culture-wars-podcast/guillermo-vasquez-interviews-e-michael-jones-what-is-identity ↑
5. Jones, Eugene Michael, Who Is destroying our civilization?, Interview – https://odysee.com/@Fitzinfo:c/Screen-Recording-2026-10-02-at-21.07.14:4 ↑
6. Laitman, Michael, ‘Russia will become the capital of Kabbalah…Marxism-Leninism prepared us for Kabbalah’: rabbi Michael Laitman, Feb. 24, 2003, IZ – https://fitzinfo.net/2024/02/22/russia-will-become-the-capital-of-kabbalah-rabbi-michael-laitman/ ↑
7. Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Most powerful Jewish organization in world Chabad completely absent from E. Michael Jones’ writings, The Fitzpatrick Informer, Jan. 28, 2023 – https://fitzinfo.net/2023/01/28/most-powerful-jewish-organization-in-world-chabad-completely-absent-from-e-michael-jones-writings/ ↑
8. Odysee – https://odysee.com/@Fitzinfo:c/Jones-and-Barrett-praise-allah:8 ↑
9. Carlos de Borbon, Alfonso, Opus Judei, Orion Publications, 1994 – http://www.reductio.net/OpusJudei-Index.html ↑
10. Engel, Randy, All the Men Behind the Opus Dei Curtain – https://newengelpublishing.com/all-the-men-behind-the-opus-dei-curtain/ ↑

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

Idaho-based agent provocateur David Reilly made several accusations Tuesday that call into question the legitimacy of the persona of famed alt Catholic personality E. Michael Jones.

Reilly’s post on X, which was soon after deleted, alleged that the 78-year-old Jones made millions with his help, was abusive to employees and even his own children, and encouraged his own son to get a divorce. Reilly, who once worked for Jones’s Culture Wars Magazine as a digital media producer and columnist, also alleged Jones had been slandering Reilly.

“I worked with EMJ and made him MILLIONS of dollars, and he has spent years seething and lying about me,” Reilly said in the post.

“I guess it’s fair game to reveal to the world that @EMichaelJones1 (sic) pressured his son Peter to get a divorce from his wife, which he had 10 kids with,” Reilly continued. “He’s also been abusive to both his employees and children.”

The outburst from Reilly, a popular online pro-Kremlin operative, follows an earlier post on X by Nathanael Kapner, another pro-Kremlin alt media personality, in which Kapner announced he would be appearing on a podcast with Jones this Friday to “expose pedo sex crimes of SSPX and David Reilly’s cover up”. It also follows a previous post several months ago where Reilly posted video footage of Jones apparently making the heil Hitler salute, to which Jones countered was merely made in jest and edited to make him look bad.

“This is your big ‘Catholic’ theologian everyone,” Reilly went on to mock Jones in the post.

That Jones might be abusive to those around him is disturbing, especially being a so called Catholic. American Attorney David Wemhoff, who apparently knew Jones, in 2016 described him as a “malignant narcissist”. Reilly has also accused Jones of being a narcissist on more than one occasion. Watching Jones on his videos and listening to his podcasts, it seems that Jones likes to dominate, so perhaps none of these accusations should come as a surprise.

Traditional Catholics tend to perceive Jones as being docile to the reforms made at the controversial Second Vatican Council, so if the accusation is true that Jones encouraged his son to get a divorce, something which is highly discouraged and difficult to obtain from the Church, according to traditional Catholic teaching, perhaps they are correct that Jones is indeed a modernist, or a wishy washy Catholic. Jones’ adherence to Catholic Orthodoxy is already in question due to his associations with occult perennialists like Alexander Dugin, Jones’ outspoken Islamophilia, and Jones’ fixation on the depersonalized and universalist descriptor for Jesus Christ as “Logos”. Jones has also been outspoken in condemning the Latin mass, which is the Church’s original form of the Holy Liturgy and is permitted in the Church even today, although scaled back in most parishes. An interesting anecdote can be found online favourable to Jones and mentions in passing that Jones wears sandals to mass (presumably the Novus Ordo mass). According to Catholic teaching, wearing sandals to mass is considered irreverent and inappropriate attire.

Lastly, the accusation by Reilly that Jones is a millionaire tends to show Jones as a hypocrite. While strongly denouncing capitalism and the West and being promoted by Marxist media outlets, he has no problem making a lucrative living, presumably selling books. There is a growing body of evidence that Jones might be pursuing a Communist agenda and certainly his anti-Western, pro-Eurasian rhetoric is useful to KGB objectives.

This latest controversy is highly ironic considering that all three players involved, Jones, Reilly, and Kapner, all seem to be pursuing the same anti-Western, pro-Kremlin agenda, although through slightly different means. Recently, Kapner claimed to have converted to Catholicism from Eastern Orthodoxy, to which Jones was very welcoming.

Reilly claimed he has a trove of documents on Jones’ dirty laundry and suggested he would release them, but as of this writing, nothing more has been posted on X by Reilly and his deleted post has not been re-instated.

Jones’ son Peter is not the son married to a Russian national that this author wrote about in 2023.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

It’s puzzled me for years what Kremlin perennialist E. Michael Jones’ primary objective is with his Communist racket over there in South Bend, Indiana.

Sure, he’s a shameless Kremlin toadie and advocate of Communism disguised as solidarism and labour-based value. He knows that cheap, superficial anti-Semitism is a tool with which gradually to acclimate Western conservatives to a backdoor acceptance of Communism. Throw in a few Catholic ideas to make it all legitimate looking and, poof! 

If the elderly Jones is an ideological Communist, then these beliefs are expected, so shilling them wouldn’t really be all that difficult for him. But there are plenty of other “alt-media” covert Communists to push this nonsense. Why would the Kremlin waste basic Commie shilling on a brilliant mind like Jones’? Yes, saturation is important in any shilling operation. But Jones has got to be one of the most intelligent Communists I’ve ever heard of. But even the intelligent can be deceived and can deceive themselves into believing nonsense, especially when lust blinds them. If Jones is as intelligent as he seems to be, then maybe he is not an ideological Communist. He seems to be a power guy, so maybe he feels empowered by Communism, by his Soviet backers, and the hold over others his Communist support affords him. 

Jones’ best work easily is Libido Dominandi, which is all about sexual passion. Jones doesn’t seem to struggle at all in the sexual lust department and knows well its power over those who submit to it. So, perhaps its a different kind of lust that plagues Jones. Perhaps it is a kind of lust for power. It has been said by those who know him that he is a narcissist, and we all know that narcissists thrive on power—even if that power seems insignificant to observers. Narcissists just can’t help themselves. Narcissists tend to be highly intelligent and, like the closely related sociopaths, tend to be wordsmiths (see Author describes E. Michael Jones as a prideful “malignant narcissist” who made himself a martyr for fame).

So, what is this seeming powerguy really up to in his work for the devil? The recurring pattern is Islam. Secondarily, it seems to be Russia, although Soviet power lurks behind both. It’s difficult to tell which narrative Jones shills more, Russia or Islam. Is the objective to get his mainly Catholic, conservative audience to warm up to Islam and Russia in the build up to the coming syncretic one-world religious and economic system, which will be headquartered in the East?

Jones just published on his site an excerpt from his article The West Has Failed: Tolkien, Traditionalism and Islamophobia in his rag Culture Wars, which continues the pattern of Russophilia and Islamophilia.

Jones advocates the tired Gaza genocide narrative as a grifter in Operation SIG and claims that Jewish power is dwindling merely because anti-Zionism is growing (contrary to popular belief, Jewry is not dependent on Zionism). Not only is Jewish privilege not dwindling, it’s increasing, at least among elite Jewry, Chabad—something Jones never talks about (see my article, Most powerful Jewish organization in world Chabad completely absent from E. Michael Jones’ writings).

Jones takes a post on X by a Jew rightfully calling out Muslims as murderers of Christians as another example of “Islamophobia”. Jones knows his audience eat up his cheap anti-Semitism and insinuates that because it was a Jew critical of Islam, it is automatically unwarranted and should, therefore, be dismissed.

“Instead of changing their behavior, they try to generate hatred for Muslims, as the neocons did after 9/11, or hatred of Germans as Morgenthau, Nizer, and Kaufmann did after World War II. All of these narratives are failing as the third republic, the American Empire, and Jewish privilege come to an end.”

Jones talks a lot about Jews needing to change their behaviour—with which we whole heartedly agree—but says nothing about Muslims needing to change their behaviour, when the two squabbling Semitic tribes are both of ill repute. You can tell that his comment about hatred of Germans was an afterthought that he threw in to make it look like his main concern was not solely the welfare of Muslims.

Why does an aging hispter reaping the benefits of capitalism while pushing Communism gain from brownnosing into the dirt a bunch of troglodytic Mohemmedans? He’s bridging the gap. Islamists not only serve as foot soldiers (Soviet Islam) for the revolution, they are the bridge to perennialist universalism. They are the key to Noahidism. Christianity and Judaism are irreconcilable, but Islam can be used to merge them, albeit unnaturally, whether directly or through dialectics.

Back to the article, Jones tells us that the threat of Sharia law in the West is all just alarmism perpetuated by “out-of-state” far Right activists pushing anti-Islamic narratives. Congratulations, Jones, you sound no different than CNN or the anti-Zionist Jewish Left. Why would Jones have a problem with Sharia law or droning Islamic prayer calls in Dearborn, Michigan or Minnesota when Jones himself is more than happy to shout “allahu ackbar” and believes Muslims and Christians follow the same God?

It’s highly suspicious that Jones has not talked about Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmitd’s admission on Russia Today a few years ago that Islam is being used by Jewry to clear out Christendom for the arrival of their false messiah. Jones has a lot to say about the Black-Jewish alliance, but when have you ever heard him talk about the Islamo-Jewish alliance? The Jewish dialectic of using Islam was birthed long before Islam was created (see Fallen angel Metatron told 2nd century Kabbalist sage Simon bar Yochai that Islam would be used to eradicate Christendom on behalf of Jewry).

In the article, Jones creates the perception that any criticism of Islam, whether it be from Tommy Robinson, Cam Higby, or an old man at the corner coffee shop is entirely the work of the Jews. The antics of provocateurs like Robinson may indeed by orchestrated, but Western opposition to Islam is absolutely warranted and imperative. His simpleton readers will not be able to see through this, though, because their understanding of the Jewish question is too shallow. They can’t see beyond the facade of Zionism the collaboration between the Jewish and Islamic elite, much less the collaboration between Russia and Jewry. Jones only focuses on the controlled opposition to Islam (Robinson, et al) because it is the easiest strawman. Jones wouldn’t stand a chance against a legitimate opponent of Islam. Someone like Trevor Loudon would tear Jones to pieces, just like Jones has been torn to pieces by race realists debunking his absurd stance on race.

And who is Jones to single out provocateurs like Robinson, Jake Lang, or Higby, when Jones himself has employed a well known Kremlin agent provocateur, David Reilly? Jones has no problem linking these provocateurs to his former employee, I assume because Jones is claiming ignorance of Reilly’s behaviour and background. How was the intelligent hipster not able to discern Reilly before he took him into his publishing house? And for how long  did Reilly continue to work for Jones while it was becoming more and more apparent his suspicious behaviour (alcoholism, entrapment, provocateuring, etc.)

“Missing from Grok’s database is the article which described Reilly’s attempt to take over Culture Wars magazine and clearly identified him as an FBI agent provocateur. During the early months of his employment as Culture Wars’ media guy, Reilly lived with fellow employee Mike Bajiackas in a rural area northwest of South Bend. Guns were part of that culture, and Mike B. introduced Reilly to Indiana gun culture in a way that would later cause serious problems:”

Jones conveniently glosses over all the things he shares in common with Reilly—to this day—like Russia and Alexander Dugin. Jones then goes on a lengthy tirade crafting the image that Reilly, the FBI, and Mossad were all working together to compromise Culture Wars. If the FBI is using provocateurs like Dave Reilly, it’s on a lower level than state actors like the Kremlin or Iran. Jones is twisting things to make himself come out looking clean, when he is actually as deep into the grifting as Reilly is.

Jones’ propping up of the Islamic ascent to the power of city halls in New York (Zohran Mamdani) and Dearborn (Abdullah H. Hammoud) as bulwarks against Jewish hegemony is laughable. Russian Communists have already claimed Mamdani as one of their own. We can only assume the same applies to Hammoud. Again, Jones is doing his best to ignore or obscure the Muslim-Jewish alliance. He’s a gatekeeper for this most crucial alliance against Christ and His Church.

Jones is a much more polished and reliable Kremlin operative than clowns like Dave Reilly. It’s easy to look better than a clown. Again, they have more in common than they don’t have in common. Operatives turn on each other all the time, especially in the Soviet controlled alt media. This is nothing new. Remember the staged Mark Dice-Alex Jones split that was miraculously healed not long after.

A new narrative has appeared from Jones’ bag of Chabadnik phylacteries. “Catholic Islamophoba”. For this, he blames an author for it, J.R.R. Tolkien, of Lord of the Rings fame. Here, Jones endorses the biggest lie of all time, the Soviet Union collapse of 1991, and portrays Catholic Islamophobia as evolving from anti-Communism. At least he (inadvertently?) admits that the two are one. Forget Mohammedan behaviour being the root cause of “Islamophobia”, it’s a children’s author. Jones made some plausible, unique interpretations of pop culture in Monsters of the Id, but as Jones would say, that Tolkien is responsible for a justifiable “phobia” of Muslims is absolutely preposterous!

But never let a good narrative go to waste.

“Tolkien despised Russia and held the Russians ‘more responsible for the present crisis and choice of moment than Hitler,’ writes Jones.

Tolkien is absolutely correct. Jones is absolutely treasonous. Nazism was a Soviet creation. But when has Jones, the great historian, ever talked about that? 

The excerpt ends and Jones concludes by appealing to, like every good kosher anti-Semite does, to the Balfour declaration, which is a Soviet distraction device (see Soviets founded state of Israel and Zionism; Balfour declaration a decoy). I am not sure where Jones goes with his Tolkien narrative and I refuse to pay him to see the entire article, but it seemed as if he was setting up Tolkien to be a pawn the Jews, as is the case with most of villains in Jones’ head.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

When most people think of an alibi, they tend to think of someone who can vouch for another in defense against wrongful prosecution. Alibis can also be used to protect guilty persons as well but requires the alibi’s complicity in the deception.

But an alibi can be something other than a person.

In the popular 1992 movie Basic Instinct, actress Sharon Stone plays a killer (Catherine Tramell) who uses her novel writing as a clever alibi. She meticulously carries out a murder in the exact way one of her characters does in one of her novels. When the police question her, she uses the alibi defense.

“I’d have to be pretty stupid to write a book about killing…and then kill somebody the way I described it in my book,” Tramell says scoffingly.

However, few realize that alibis are regularly used for propaganda purposes, especially today, decades after the Soviet strategists reformatted their tactics to focus on controlled opposition.

How it works is somewhat complex, but generally speaking alibis accomplish two primary objectives for controlled agents of influence conducting covert psychological warfare against targets.

The strategic alibi

1. Alibis broaden the audience of the agent of influence. Using the flip-flop method (regularly or irregularly changing positions on a given subject), the agent of influence can appeal to a wider audience than standing firm on one or more positions. For example (and this has actually happened—with Alex Jones of Infowars), one may flip flop on their stance on the Middle East conflict. One week they may support Zionism, while the following week they don’t. With this angle, the agent can appeal to both Zionists and anti-Zionists; meanwhile, obscuring the agent’s true position so that propaganda can be more effective. Being a Zionist is the agent’s alibi when being accused of anti-Zionism, and being an anti-Zionist is the agent’s alibi when accused of being a Zionist. Additionally, a simple portrayal of neutrality can also act as an alibi. The agent can toggle between pro, contra, or neutral at his/her discretion.
2. Alibis provide cover for the agent of influence. Where the alibi comes in is when a critic of an agent of influence challenges their position at the time of an apparent contradiction in the agent’s narrative, the agent, or one of his/her supporters, can point to a time in the past when the agent took the opposite or neutral position; thereby, deflecting the criticism away from the agent and maintaining the agent’s credibility. This tactic doesn’t fool everyone, but it seems to fool the majority of supporters of agents of influence. It’s a calculated risk for the agent of influence, and the odds typically are in his/her favour, especially if the agent employs a cult of personality (Stalin, Hitler, Reagan, Trump, Alex Jones, Nick Fuentes all have used cults of personality through which to propagandize their audience).

The strategic alibi relies on the docility of the target. The shorter the memory; the weaker the discernment; the deeper the cult of personality, the easier it will be to fool the mark. A discerning person with a decent memory and less susceptibility to cult of personality can initially be fooled by an agent’s strategic alibi, but in time he should be able to catch the patterns of contradiction and deception, especially if a third party points it out to him. Someone who quickly dismisses reasonable warnings of a third party is likely stuck in a cult of personality of their favourite “truther”. Don’t waste your time with these people. Their issues are more psychological. Some males get sucked into cults of personality due to unresolved parent issues and can seek out a father figure in their chosen cult leader. I suspect this is the case with many Nick Fuentes followers (this would be very ironic considering Fuentes is a suspected homosexual).

The nature of the alibi

Discerning the nature of the alibi is important, because its quantity and quality can be very deceptive. An agent may only need to provide himself with one reference point in the past with which to build his alibi. For example, the argument that “Nick Fuentes can’t be covering for [Russian] Jewry (Chabad), because he mentioned them last week on is podcast!”. In this real-world example (recently someone used this excuse with me), Fuentes mentioned Chabad one time in passing and it was nothing close to substantial, but now he has provided himself with a point to which he can refer back when a critic discerns the inconsistency in his narrative, which does indeed run cover for Russian Jewry. This brings me to the next point, the quality of the alibi. We can see that all it takes is one single reference point with which an agent can fool his audience of marks, but the quality is just as important. If Fuentes had actually spoke in depth about Chabad rather than just referring to them by name, his alibi would’ve been harder to uncover, but speaking in depth would potentially tell too much of a group he is supposed to be protecting, so these shills won’t get deep (in the example of Kremlin asset E. Michael Jones, he mentioned Chabad one time out of all his books and magazines, and it was in passing, just as Fuentes has done). A competent analyst uses both quality and quantity when assessing the legitimacy of a person of influence. How many times has the influencer referenced someone/something on a given subject? Have they spent more time referencing a counter point? If so, how deep have they gone covering the counterpoints—deeper than the initial points? Do they flip flop on their positions? These are the questions one should be asking himself when discerning influencers.

I discerned in the early days of Alex Jones’ alt media career that he did indeed talk about the Holocaust critically at times (he was suspected of shilling for the Jews) but it lacked both quality and quantity, especially when compared with the length of time and depth he spent talking about Hitler and the Nazis. So, I came up with the idea of a key-word count that I used when watching his documentaries and relayed this to my readers. The results were lopsided and revealed Jones’ bias, at least in terms of quantity. I was among the first to be skeptical of Jones in the mid 2000s and only a few thought my analysis of him as a controlled agent of influence was plausible. Most people thought I was crazy, but when I started publishing the key-word analyses, it gave much more credibility to my theory on Jones and my readers started to take it more seriously. In Invisible Empire, you can see that Jones overwhelmingly referenced Hitler and the Nazis, a clearly identifiable group, over other identifiable groups. Even if Jones had said something really critical of the Holocaust industry, next to the numerous references to Hitler and the Nazis, the memory of that Holocaust revelation would have quickly faded from the memory of his audience—yet Jones would have the alibi of being no friend to the Jews because he criticized the Holocaust (although not in any meaningful way). 

Trojan Horses:  3D-chess, anti-LGBT, and pro-life alibis

The “3D-chess” alibi has been a staple technique of Trump and his team of Soviet assets. The gist of this ingeniously deceptive tactic is that it again allows the agent to advance the agenda of his handlers whilst simultaneously appearing to oppose the agenda of said handlers. “Trump is really working at against the New World Order even though he seems to be going along with it,” the rhetoric goes. “So just sit back and wait for him to drain the swamp”. The key here is the sitting back park. This tactic is designed to get Western conservatives/anti-Communists to do nothing, because the [controlled agent of influence] will take care of everything. It’s designed to stifle organic dissident action, which is the real threat to the Communist conspiracy. Because it’s a plausible strategy—acting as a double agent, many Western conservatives fall for this tactic. But if said double agent is really just playing 3D chess, there should be a point at which one can demonstrate that the so-called dissident is covertly turning things around for the good guys, and that is not happening with Trump, Putin, or any other so called 3D-chess master. The agenda continues to advance largely or entirely unhindered. Things are not turning around, perhaps in even the slightest way. At an advanced level of this deception, the Communist might allow some smaller things to appear to be turning around, but it’s really just a temporal concession that feeds the illusion that the 3D chess masters are genuine.

Some of the concessions the Communists have allowed recently are the overturing of Roe vs. Wade, for which agent Trump Krasnov is taking credit, and concessions to traditional views on sexuality, which are happening mainly in Eastern Europe and Russia. Remember, though, that Soviet concessions are not victories for the West; they are strategic only. Controlled opposition within Christendom is also benefitting from the pro-life alibi. The strategists realize that as long as they can appeal to Western Christians from the pro-life point of view, they can use it to establish credibility with one of their controlled agents and then use the agent’s remaining narrative it to slip in the poison. This alibi acts as a sort of Trojan Horse. The Opus Dei-controlled Catholic alt media comes to mind, like the Dugin-connected, pro-Kremlin Life Site News crowd. Some people are so deceived by the pro-life alibi that it seems as if the anti-Christ himself would slip under the radar using the disguise of a pro-life warrior. The competent analyst does not discern based on concessions. Instead, he takes in the entirety of the narrative, using pattern recognition, history, popularity, and presence of alibis when discerning a person or group.

The still Soviet empire of the Russian Federation owes most of its positive credibility in Western conservative circles today to its policies in the socio-sexual realm. Make no mistake, though, Russian policy seemingly contrary to neo-Western LGBTism does not exist for moral reasons but for strategic reasons: to maintain social stability at home in preparation for a military buildup for future conflict with the West, and abroad to deceive naïve Western conservatives into supporting the camouflaged Soviet axis of evil, which is portrayed as morally and intellectually superior.

Like with Trump, many Putin apologists try to excuse his behaviour as simply playing 3-D or 5-D chess. It works on the simplest of minds. But anyone who gives an honest look at what Putin is doing can clearly see that he is not any kind of hindrance to the world Communist plan but is, instead, advancing it perhaps farther than anyone else is.

Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV | Part V | Part VI | Part VII

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 16, 2025 Anno Domini

Hopefully by now, one can see that Trump is a sexually compromised pervert controlled by a joint KGB-Mossad compromise (kompromat) operation to direct the U.S. presidency towards world Communist aims, which is less overt than control through the Democrat side of things, since Trump poses as a conservative and, laughably, a Christian. It’s been nearly five years since this author wrote the last piece in this series and a lot has happened, but nothing that wasn’t difficult to predict. Only the level of depravity and treason is shocking. This and the following installment will provide more evidence of Trump’s treason and perhaps tie up any loose ends in this traitorous affair.

Star witness Giuffre seems to confirm Farmer’s claim of Trump’s sexual abuse of teens

The star witness in the whole Epstein affair arguably is Virginia Giuffre (formerly Roberts). Although she has denied personally seeing Trump abuse underaged girls, she admitted that he knew about the abuse at the hands of Epstein and Maxwell but did nothing. Interestingly, she seems to support the testimony of Maria Farmer, a lesser known Epstein witness, about whom this author wrote in Part VI, where Trump and his then wife Ivana were facilitating and participating in the child sex abuse. On January 14, 2021, this author tagged Giuffre with a specific quote from Farmer and a link to Part VI of this series.^[1] She liked the Tweet. This author made a screen recording of it to prove the like, in case someone suspected photoshopping of the screen capture.^[2] Farmer’s testimony seems very credible. There doesn’t seem to be a financial motive to name Trump, which wasn’t part of her general claim against Epstein. Furthermore, naming someone as high profile as the U.S. President could possibly get one killed, and Farmer likely knew this but did so anyway. Credit to her bravery. With Ghislaine Maxwell now in jail (currently she is seeking a presidential pardon from her old friend Donald Trump)^[3]., Epstein dead, and Ivana also dead, we may never know the truth about Ivana’s involvement, but we see the patterns, which I think is enough.

Ivana’s Polish-Bronfman connection to Epstein

This author wrote about Ivana, Trump’s KGB-tied Soviet ex wife, in parts I, IV, and especially in VI, before she died in 2022 (under mysterious circumstances, in this author’s opinion)^[4]. It’s no surprise that Jeffrey Epstein had 14 phone numbers to the Trumps in his contact book, some of which included numbers to Ivana and even to Trump’s current wife Melania, whom Epstein claims was introduced to Trump by him.^[5] From Ivana’s Palm Beach home, where she allegedly went down the street to help Ghislaine Maxwell recruit high school girls for Epstein’s revolving-door teenage harem, she employed the wife and daughter of Epstein’s Polish national butler Janusz Banasiak.^[6] The butler previously worked for a Manhattan family and ran a conference centre for the Bronfman family’s Seagrams distilleries. The Russian-Jewish Bronfman family are considered the Rothschilds of North America and became rich bootlegging during prohibition. However, the Bronfman’s power was not enough to keep American heiress and daughter of Edgar Bronfman Sr. Claire Web Bronfman from prison time for her involvement in the NXIVM sex cult, which carried out sex trafficking. Readers of this series will remember that Trump is connected to the Bronfman’s through the gay, Jewish, mobbed up lawyer Roy Cohn and Russian-Jewish mob boss Meyer Lansky and his organized crime syndicate. So important was Cohn to Trump that he regularly called Cohn over a dozen times a day. Epstein, who himself was born through two sets of Russian—Jewish grandparents, is also tied to the Bronfmans through financier Les Wexner (also Trump connected), who helped Charles Bronfman set up the Study Group, also known as the Mega Group, the same year as the fake collapse of Communism in 1991.^[7] Interestingly, Epstein’s little black book had not only contacts for Ivana but also for one Edgar Bronfman.

Frog as a homosexual symbol, kek gay grifters

For an over-the-top womanizer and alleged rapist, Trump strangely surrounds himself with a lot of prominent homosexuals—going back to the late B’nai Brither Roy Cohn and trysexuals like the Murray Chotiner-groomed Roger Stone (Chotiner was an associate of Jewish mobster Mickey Cohen, who was under the wings of Russian-Jewish mob boss Meyer Lansky). When Trump won his first presidency, he came out to We Are the Champions, by late homosexual Freddy Mercury and his band Queen. Incidentally, the ancient Egyptian-based “kek” meme that Trump’s MAGA and Qanon movements popularized has connections to the homosexual underworld.^[8] As it happens, the gay Cohn had an unusual fixation with frogs. Could the various frog memes surrounding Trump’s presidency be tied to, in some way, to the frog as a gay symbol? To go a bit further, could Trump’s excessive womanizing personality be somewhat of a cover for something even more perverse than heterosexual rape?

“Trump would go from ‘room to room’ where there were ‘guys with younger girls, sex, a lot of sex, a lot of cocaine, top shelf liquor’ but no smoking, which the businessman didn’t approve of, the photographer told the Daily Beast.

Trump was in and out. He’d wander off with a couple girls. I saw him. He was getting laid like crazy,’…‘A lot of girls, 14, look 24,’ he said. ‘That’s as juicy as I can get. I never asked how old they were; I just partook.’…

‘It’s based on power and dominating girls who can’t push back and can be discarded.’”^[9]

Sex based on power is said to be at the heart of various sexual perversions, including homosexuality. Love is completely absent from it. Trump’s niece Mary Trump revealed in her 2020 memoir Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World’s Most Dangerous Man, that Donald was abused by his father growing up.^[10] There is a connection between both physical and sexual abuse of children and latent homosexuality manifesting in adult life. Mary, who is a psychologist, describes Donald Trump as a narcissist and sociopath and says “the only time Donald went to church is when the cameras were there. Itʼs mind boggling. He has no principles. None!”

“And in another chapter, Mary claims her uncle ogled her when she was 29 years old and in a swimsuit at Mar-a-Lago, with Donald allegedly saying: ‘Holy s**t, Mary, you’re stacked!”

Perhaps the Donald is a little like the criminal buddy of his he helped get pardoned from prison Roger Stone—a trysexual, with girls, boys, men, women, etc? Stone, alleged to have been involved in Republican boy-buggering rings, may well have been buggered by Cohn himself, Cohn associates, or other pederasts in Washington. That would certainly begin to explain why Stone seems so deranged and perverted. Another apparent gay grifter in Trump’s sphere and one with whom Trump once dined at Mar-a-Lago is Nicholas Fuentes, a Kremlin asset credited with creating the “groyper” controlled-opposition stable. This author has compiled an extensive dossier on Fuentes showing his strong Soviet leanings and apparent latent homosexuality. It doesn’t help Trumps heterosexual case when he fondles and kisses the fake boobs of a Rudy Giuliani in drag. Giuliani has his own ties to the Soviets.

Trump, Linda, and Vince McMahon’s World Pederast Federation

Disgraced former World Wrestling Entertainment CEO Vince McMahon is another example of what child sex abuse can lead to (former wrestlers Scott Hall and Kevin Nash claimed in a shoot interview that McMahon was sexually abused by men as a child and had other gay experiences^[11]). McMahon is a friend of Donald Trump and has even put Trump in the ring as a kayfabed wrestling actor, which is more appropriate for Trump than him being president of the United States. Trump recently appointed McMahon’s wife Linda to secretary of education, which is about as plausible as Sesame Street’s Ernie becoming U.S. attorney general. For decades, McMahon and his company have been dogged by sexual abuse lawsuits and accusations. From rape to a casting couch-styled career ladder, to buggery and a pederast ring called the “Cream Team” (ring boys from the towns where WWF/WWE matches were held would stay around the arena to help put up and take down the rings and were then sexually abused by various staff, allegedly led by Pat Patterson, with McMahon’s knowledge)^[12], ^[13]McMahon’s company would make the Marquis de Sade and Aleister Crowley proud. Former WWF world champion Ultimate Warrior (Jim Helwig) claimed in a shoot interview he did of himself that McMahon’s strategy “back then was to make sure the personal lives of [the] talent were in constant chaos” in order for him to maintain control over them.^[14] Helwig’s admission was referring to Hulk Hogan (Terry Bollea) as well, who happens to be a Trump supporter. It seems that McMahon, like Trump, is a power-hungry and perverted sociopath, so the pairing of the two is natural.

Vagina-hands Trump hails Chabad false messiah – is he Jewish?

Recently, Donald Trump declared Chabad Lubavitch’s false messiah “rebbe” Menachem Mendel Schneerson the messiah by calling him “king”, which many observers mistakenly believed was a reference to Trump himself. Chabad Russia cleared up the confusion and shows that it was a reference to Schneerson, likely left deliberately vague by Trump.^[15] Chabadniks refer to rebbe Schneerson as King Moshiach (king messiah). Naturally, this in addition to his decades of loyalty to the world Jewish lobby, raise the question of whether Trump’s loyalty to Jewry is rooted in his possible Jewish ethnicity or if it’s merely calculated opportunism. Donald’s brother Freddy Jr. joined a Jewish fraternity while attending an Episcopalian boys’ preparatory school on Long Island. Freddy also claimed that his father Fred Sr. was Jewish.^[16] The New York Times denies that the Trumps are Jewish, but this author discovered a mezuzah (Jewish phylactery) on the doorpost of the Queens home where Donald Trump and his siblings grew up. Sure, the mezuzah could’ve been added later, after the family left it (it was recently auctioned off), but perhaps it wasn’t. Perhaps it was passed on to other Jews, which isn’t uncommon in Jewish real estate transactions. Incidentally, the long suspected crypto-Jew Vladimir Putin installed a mezuzah on the Moscow Marina Roscha synagogue, a ceremony that is exclusive to Jews.

“Putin, once a KGB agent in the last years of communism, hammered-in the mezuzah on the shul’s front door”.^[17]

If Freddy Jr. was telling the truth, then his father’s financial support of Chabad Lubavitch in New York makes a lot more sense. Brighton Beach, also known as Little Odessa, is not only a Chabad hotspot once visited by “king” Schneerson^[18] but was also the landing spot of Soviet Jewish emigres, many of whom were informants for the KGB. Author Craig Unger, who is no anti-Semite by any stretch of the imagination, wrote in his book House of Trump, House of Putin about the Brighton Beach Bolsheviks,

“According to Oleg Kalugin, the former head of counterintelligence for the KGB, at least two hundred Jews from Leningrad (now St. Petersburg) alone went to the U.S., and many of them promised to report back to the KGB once they were settled.”^[19]

Incidentally, Kalugin has also claimed that Vladimir Putin is a pedophile—corroborating Soviet defector Alexander Litvinenko’s claim shortly before he died. Litvinenko caught news footage of Putin kissing the stomach of a strange five-year-old boy in the town square and pointed out that the KGB has tapes of Putin buggering young boys as a form of kompromat blackmail. So Trump is by no means the only one. In fact, Senator John Tower, who was photographed on the same yacht with Trump and KGB operative Robert Maxwell (see lead photo from part V), who is believed to be the ring leader of Epstein’s kompromat operation, was sexually compromised by the Soviets himself, perhaps via Maxwell and/or Epstein, too.

Trump co-conspirator Felix Sater, son of Russian-Jewish mob boss Mikhail Sater (Sheferovsky) and a mobster himself, grew up near Brighton Beach and once worked for Epstein’s former employer Bear Stearns. Chabad’s “man of the year”, Sater was one of many Brighton Beach Bolsheviks to utilize Trump-owned real estate. Another Russia-Jewish mobster, David Bogatin, used money defrauded from the U.S. government to purchase luxury condos in Trump Tower in 1984.^[20] The Bogatin family are members of Crown Heights Chabad Lubavitch.^[21]

This author spoke about Fred Trump in part IV and how he rose to prominence in Brooklyn with the help of powerful Jews and died at a Jewish medical centre, but what this author didn’t know then was just how prominent Trump was in Brighton Beach. Fred built a Trump Village apartment complex in Brighton Beach that, no doubt, housed many of the Brighton Beach Bolsheviks fresh off the boat from the Soviet Union. The co-operative complex still stands today. Jeffrey Epstein’s grandparents came to New York when they left the Soviet Union. There is a high probability that they first settled in Brighton Beach.

“Even though Brighton Beach was Fred Trump’s territory, Donald began developing his own contacts among the new Russian emigres, including a man named Semyon Kislin. When it came to equipping his new renovated Grand Hyatt Hotel, née the Commodore, with TV sets in the late seventies, Trump reached out to Kislin to buy a few hundred on credit. ‘I gave him [Trump] 30 days, and in exactly 30 days he paid me back,’ said Kislin.”^[22]

The FBI lists Kislin as a “member or associate” of the ruthless Soviet organized crime boss Vyacheslav Ivankov (now dead).

Midway through his first presidency, it was rumoured that President Trump converted to Judaism, much like his daughter Ivanka did and who visits the grave of Schneerson (Trump has also paid homage at Schneerson’s grave and even declared it an official heritage site); although, if Trump is ethnically Jewish, then it’s not really a conversion. In 2007, a leading Israeli newspaper declared Trump a “Jewish billionaire”. Other Israeli press have also teased that Trump is Jewish.^{[23] [24]} While Chabadnik Ivanka likes to wear her Kabbalah red string on her wrist, Trump does not appear to do the same; although, he does have a Kabbalist tree of life award prominently displayed in his Manhattan office. Trump also displays a peculiar habit during photo ops of unnaturally holding his hands in an inverted triangle formation, sometimes for long periods of time. This author recently watched his press conference with Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House where Trump held his triangle hands for nearly the entire press conference. It is believed to be a form of symbolism derived from the Kabbalah (Zohar) and its sister cult Hinduism. Late occult researcher Texe Marrs explains,

“…Mystery Religions greatly honoured this emblem as their tantric (sexual) female Triangle of Life. It was known as the Kali Yantra, a sign of the female vulva. In Egypt, the triangle was a hieroglyphics sign for ‘woman’. In ancient Greece, the sexual intent is clear in that the triangle represented the Holy Door, genitalia of the All-Mother Demeter, known as ‘Mother Delta’…. To occultists, the triangle pointing upward represents fire and that pointing downward water. To combine, balance, and unite the two brings dualism, or equilibrium, which is a goal of Freemasonry and a cardinal tenet of all Illuminist religious systems.”^[25]

Clearly, a man like Trump who is known to “grab them by the pussy” would have no problem making himself into a pussy, firstly to honour his kabbalistic gods but also to signal to other elitists that, “hey, it may look like I am going against you guys, but I’m really not, so just go along with my populist act”. Trump has many Freemasonic associations and may be one himself. Freemasonry is an outgrowth of the Kabbalah.

“On 18 August 2016 five statues of then presidential nominee Donald Trump, commissioned by the activist collective Indecline, were placed in San Francisco, New York, Los Angeles, Cleveland and Seattle. The nude figure is wearing a masonic square and compasses emblem ring, although Las Vegas-based sculptor, Ginger (Joshua Monroe), has stated in an interview with Greg Stewart that he knew Trump was not a Freemason but used the ring to symbolize his secret dealings. While claiming to respect Freemasons and their good work, the use of this iconic symbol further mythologizes and marginalizes the organization that it is known to represent.”^[26]

Masonic or not, there is little doubt that Trump is a Kabbalah practitioner, like Ivanka, his ex wife Marla Maples, Tucker Carlson, and Vladimir Putin.^[27]

Notes:

1. @Fitzinfo, Twitter, January 14, 2021 – https://x.com/FitzInfo/status/1349948862014881797 ↑
2. @Fitzinfo, Twitter, January 10, 2024 – https://x.com/FitzInfo/status/1745235643951706169 ↑
3. McGuigan, Shannon, Ghislaine Maxwell ‘is considering seeking presidential pardon from her old friend Donald Trump’ as she rots in jail for 20 years for trafficking underage girls for Jeffrey Epstein, The Daily Mail, March 1, 2025 – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14450361/Ghislaine-Maxwell-pardon-Donald-Trump-trafficking-girls-Jeffrey-Epstein.html ↑
4. Times of Israel, Ivana Trump died of accidental ‘blunt impact’ to torso, official says, 16 July 2022 – https://www.timesofisrael.com/ivana-trump-died-of-accidental-blunt-impact-to-torso-official-says/ ↑
5. Einbinder, Nicole, Jeffrey Epstein had 14 phone numbers connected to Trump in his contacts, Business Insider, July 10, 2019 – https://www.businessinsider.com/jeffrey-epstein-14-phone-numbers-connected-trump-black-book-2019-7 ↑
6. Briquelet, Kate, The Family That Worked for Jeffrey Epstein—and a Trump, The Daily Beast, October 14, 2019 – https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-family-that-worked-for-jeffrey-epsteinand-a-trump/ ↑
7. Sherman, Gabriel, The Mogul and the Monster: Inside Jeffrey Epstein’s Decades-Long Relationship With His Biggest Client, Vanity Fair, June 8, 2021 – https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/inside-jeffrey-epsteins-decades-long-relationship-with-his-biggest-client ↑
8. Stokes, Colin, “Frog and Toad”: An Amphibious Celebration of Same-Sex Love, The New Yorker, May 31, 2016 – https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/frog-and-toad-an-amphibious-celebration-of-same-sex-love ↑
9. Rahman, Khaleda, Donald Trump ‘hosted wild parties with sex, cocaine and underage models’ when he owned the Plaza Hotel, 25 October 2016 – The Daily Mail – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3869504/Donald-Trump-hosted-wild-parties-sex-cocaine-underage-models.html ↑
10. The Daily Mail, Donald Trump suffered ‘child abuse’ at the hands of his father, his niece claims in book, 2020 – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8498179/Donald-Trump-suffered-child-abuse-hands-father-niece-claims-book.html ↑
11. Kliq THIS, Kevin Nash on Vince McMahon’s first gay experience, YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OI2wmQlzhjY ↑
12. Ring of Vice segment from 1990s Geraldo Rivera television show – https://odysee.com/@Fitzinfo:c/Geraldo–Craig-Rivera—Exposing-The-WWF_480p:5 ↑
13. Donahue Show, 1992, WWF Drug and Sex Scandal – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPTCRnBEUJM ↑
14. OFF DA REC, The Ultimate Warrior Shoots on Hulk Hogan (FULL Version), YouTube – https://youtu.be/vDPfGr1VYlg?feature=shared&t=1657 ↑
15. Lugov, Sholem, Trump: “Long live the king!”, February 20, 2025 – https://fitzinfo.net/2025/02/22/donald-trump-acknowledges-chassidic-judaisms-false-messiah-rebbe-menachem-mendel-schneerson-calls-him-king/ ↑
16. Horowitz, Jason, For Donald Trump, Lessons From a Brother’s Suffering, Jan. 2, 2016, New York Times – https://web.archive.org/web/20250213025454/https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/03/us/politics/for-donald-trump-lessons-from-a-brothers-suffering.html ↑
17. Mark, Jonathan, Overthrowing The Czar Was Great For The Jews, Until It Wasn’t, December 12, 2017, Jewish Telegraphic Agency – https://www.jta.org/2017/12/12/ny/100-candles-for-the-russian-revolution ↑
18. Lugov, Sholem, Chabad’s false messiahs congregated at Brighton Beach synagogue in 1992, at height of Soviet mafia penetration of America, March 24, 2014, Moschiach.ru – https://fitzinfo.net/forum/topic/chabads-false-messiahs-congregated-at-brighton-beach-synagogue-in-1992-at-height-of-soviet-mafia-penetration-of-america/#postid-1459 ↑
19. Unger, Craig, House of Trump House of Putin – The Untold Story of Donald Trump and the Russian Mafia, 2018, Dutton, pg. 42 ↑
20. Zabrisky, Zarina, Taj Mahal Stars, Jan. 12, 2018, Medium – https://zarinazabrisky.medium.com/taj-mahal-stars-e6da0908aab5 ↑
21. Zaklikowski, David, Noach Vogatin, 94, OBM, April 4, 2013, Crown Heights Info – https://crownheights.info/notices/380257/noach-bogatin-94-obm/ ↑
22. Unger, Craig, House of Trump House of Putin – The Untold Story of Donald Trump and the Russian Mafia, 2018, Dutton, pgs. 30-31. ↑
23. Peyman, David, Donald Trump, America’s first Jewish president, Nov. 6, 2016, Times of Israel – https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/donald-trump-americas-first-jewish-president/ ↑
24. Berler, Ron, Trump Converts!, March 13, 2025, Times of Israel – https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/trump-converts/ ↑
25. Marrs, Texe, Codex Magica: Secret Signs, Mysterious Symbols, and Hidden Codes of the Illuminati, 2005, RiverCrest Publishing, pgs. 327-328 ↑
26. Donald Trump Nude Ring, Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon – https://freemasonry.bcy.ca/pop_culture/trump_nude_ring.html ↑
27. Fitzpatrick, Timothy, The presidential Kabbalah cult unmasked, Aug. 6, 2020, Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.net/2020/08/06/the-presidential-kabbalah-cult-unmasked/ ↑

By Ryan Augustine
February 23, 2025 Anno Domini

The Alt-right grift known as MAGA is doomed to fail. The movement will achieve none of its platform goals. This falls squarely on the bulk of the people which make up the movement for not empowering themselves politically and instead trusting the plan.

For any political movement to be successful it must have sufficient power to achieve its goals, the movement must have the means to effect the change it seeks.

As a case study, we can look at the Jews and see how they gained political dominance. The Jewish people used debt-based finance and, aided by Satan and his minions, they parlayed the profit from usury to establish secret societies, criminal networks, and influence over the rulers of Europe. When the economies modernized out of feudalism and into the modern era, the Jews pounced on opportunities to seize control over key industries like banking, printing, movies, and television, which allowed them to control the public discourse and change the national culture to entrench themselves in a dominant position while democracies were replacing the old order. It’s not hard to see that there is a casual relationship between political power and ownership of the mechanisms which can be used to effect change.

For instance, when the Jewish nation wishes to pursue one of its political goals: mass immigration it is able to leverage it’s control over the industries and relationships it owns to effect the change in immigration policy it seeks. They have used their control over television and movies to eliminate all white racism, the natural defense against immigration. Banks and financial institutions, along with a media campaign, have pressured politicians to pass generous welfare bills which enable mass migration. Hedge funds set the boards of directors for all major U.S. corporations with pro-immigrant stooges. Left-wing foundations and “charities” sue any one business or organization that acts to oppose immigration, etc.

This is perhaps the prime reason we can know from all the retarded conspiracy  theories that the Jewish question is real, because there is a direct traceable link between Jewish power and their control mechanisms (as compared to the Jesuits who supposedly run the world because they have a few high schools or whatever).

What can be learned from our enemies here is that politics is not simply wishful thinking; it’s not emoting really hard at something. For politics to be successful, a lot of hard work and dedication has to be put in at a level where real power, or more precisely where power comes from, can be attained. Voting hard doesn’t mean anything.

This is why MAGA is doomed to fail. Maga will fail because MAGA doesn’t own anything and there is no mechanism by which the Maga movement can influence the direction the leaders of the movement take it. There is no mechanism through which the Maga rank and file can hold accountable the likes of Trump, Vance, or whoever pulls their strings.

Although MAGA is billed as a populist movement, it is in fact the opposite: a highly top-down tightly controlled foreign/financial marriage of an operation. If we had to pick two planks of the MAGA platform, they would be reducing the power of immigrants and checking the power of the “deep state/globalist/whathaveyou” elite. The facts are that Trump is a billionaire married to an immigrant, his vice president the Manchurian neckbeard Vance is married to an immigrant, his purse-man fixer Elon Musk is allegedly the worlds richest man and an immigrant, and his administration is full of obscenely wealthy, gay, weird, Indian people, and there is a lot of overlap.

The Information economy which comprises MAGA is highly regulated and flows through international globalist (in the true sense of the word) corporations owned by billionaires. Telegram is owned by a gay new-age billionaire Peter Theil and Twitter (now X) is owned by Satanist immigrant billionaire Elon Musk. The vast majority of influential accounts which disseminate information and talking points to the MAGA rank and file are either gay, foreign, or brown. And if, by chance, you can find one that doesn’t fall into that Venn diagram, it’s likely Jewish. This is why the MAGA movement has essentially adopted all the planks of Communism under the “based” adjective.  It is because the people who make up MAGA have no agency in their own movement and are led around by their disordered feeling by the most sophisticated psychological operation money can buy and science can create. This is why if one were to make a power diagram of the MAGA movement, it would look very similar to the Illuminati power pyramid.

How did things ever get so bad? The short answer is because MAGA is a degenerate and lazy movement. It shares a lot of similarities with the evangelical movement, where feeling really hard about something substitutes hard work. MAGA has never wanted to put the work that it takes to build up a power base; instead, they have simply gone rabid in their support for Trump as if “owning the libs” could ever effect real change. It’s similar to how some football fans like to get drunk, put on costumes, and yell really loudly thinking they are helping their team score touchdowns, and when the game ends they tell themselves: “WE won.” Losers. It is very similar to the whole faith alone vs. works debate in Christian circles. I’ve never really understood this because if you have the faith, you do the works. If you won’t work for something you believe in, then how much did you really believe in it? How many in MAGA actually work to make America great? Or do they all use faith in Trump as their surrogate? It speaks for itself.

If the MAGA movement wants to win, it needs to take immediate actionable steps. There is a lot of low hanging fruit as our enemies have become fat and complacent in their overlordship of us. For example, their main weapon is the dominance they have over American culture through movies, television, and music. However there has not been a good album produced in the Last 30 years—all music is literally the same as sticking a fork down your garbage disposal, turning it on, and listening. Similarly, there hasn’t been a good movie produced in who knows how long. A movie would be even easier to do than an album. We have 3,000 years of books and plays from which to draw. All the scripts are already written. You don’t even need that big of a budget if you hire theater actors and don’t go crazy on CGI. Put it on Odyssey for free and you have a tax write-off for all these MAGA billionaires, millionaires; even Alex Jones’s Infowars network could do it if they spent only 10 per cent of their marketing budget for boner pills.

In order for MAGA to be a successful counter revolution and to really return America to greatness, it must counter our current culture with something. Cheerleading for the president will not cut it because a successful political movement can never be a passive thing. If MAGA wants to succeed it must leverage the vast energy it’s followers possess towards building the institutions through which it can use its energy towards acquiring power. MAGA must provide real challenges to the current political power structure, such as producing good movies. A good movie which puts forth real conservatism as winning will have an effect that cannot be overstated. But MAGA won’t do that because that would be winning.

“Dictatorship can be established only by a victory of socialism in different countries or groups of countries, after which there would be federal unions of the various groupings of these socialist countries, and the third stage would be an amalgamation of these regional federal unions into a world union of socialist nations.”

—Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin

By Charlotte Iserbyt
February 27, 2007 Anno Domini

There is one common thread running through all articles and speeches by elected officials, well-known writers, and commentators in opposition to the merging of the United States into a political and economic regional arrangement known as the North American Union. To my knowledge, not one of them has chosen to use the “C” word (Communism) when warning Americans of the dangers of this unconstitutional merger about to be foisted upon us without proper hearings in Congress. Excellent speeches and articles are being given and written warning us of all sorts of bad things related to this merger, including the fact that we will lose our sovereignty, but we are not being told that all these bad things are necessary for the full implementation of The North American Soviet Union (communistic/regional system). Isn’t the “C” word the one and only word which might shock Americans out of their state of conditioned apathy, thereby bringing about citizen activism which might result in killing this “regional” monster?

Morris Zeitlin, a communist writer for the Communist Party�s Daily World said in an article entitled Planning is Socialism Trademark, November 8, 1975:”We (USA) have no regional government and no comprehensive regional planning to speak of. Regional government and planning remain concepts our urban scholars and planners have long advocated in vain. In socialist countries, metropolitan regions enjoy metropolitan regional government and comprehensive planning. The economic and functional efficiencies and the social benefits that comprehensive national, regional and city planning make possible in socialist society explain the Soviet Union’s enormous and rapid economic social progress.”

Of interest regarding Zeitlin’s comment about “the Soviet Union’s enormous and rapid economic social progress” is the following admission made by former President Gorbachev at the 2005 National School Board Association conference that “half the world’s population and two-thirds of Russians lives in poverty.”

The United States Government, at all levels, has since 1975 accepted wholeheartedly Zeitlin’s advice, to the extent that our country is, believe it or not, almost 100 percent socialist in its political, economic, social, and environmental (sustainable development) policies. For documentation please read Walks Like a Duck, Talks Like a Duck.

The regionalization (consolidation) of the world is quite similar to the three-stage plan outlined by Stalin at the 1936 Communist International. At that meeting, the official program proclaimed:

“Dictatorship can be established only by a victory of socialism in different countries or groups of countries, after which there would be federal unions of the various groupings of these socialist countries, and the third stage would be an amalgamation of these regional federal unions into a world union of socialist nations.” (Ed note: The third stage is taking place right now as we in the United States of America become part of a federal union, the North American Union, which will in the near future become part of a world union of socialist nations.)

Former President of the Soviet Union Gorbachev on March 23, 2000, in London, referred to the European Union (EU) as “the New European Soviet.” If he refers to the E.U. in that way, it only stands to reason that he would refer to the North American Union (NAU) as the “New American Soviet,” since the NAU is modeled on the E.U. Gorbachev also said in his speech to the Soviet Central Committee on November 2, 1987, published by Novosti Press Agency Publishing House:

“We are moving toward a new world, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.”—Gorbachev

How is it possible that if American citizens or United States officials involved in putting us under the North American Union were aware of Gorbachev’s statements, they would not be very concerned regarding our nation becoming part of a Communist world? Have we forgotten the many hundreds of millions of innocent people tortured, starved, murdered, and incarcerated by Communist regimes around the world? Authorities say “over 20 million people suffered in purges under Vladimir Lenin and Josef Stalin — and that more than 10 million died before Stalin’s death in 1953. Some put the number even higher.” [Read]

Do we really believe the Communists have changed or gone away?

United States government officials, elected and unelected, with enormous financial assistance from the tax-exempt foundations, have for many years been working to implement unconstitutional regional planning at the local, state, national and international level, all of this required for full implementation of a One World Socialist Government. For the 3000-page transcript of 1953 Congressional (Reece and Cox Committee) Hearings to Investigate the Tax-Exempt Foundations and for superb research on the history of regional government, go to americandeception.com and type the following into its search engine: Reece Committee, Don Bell Reports, Maureen Heaton, the Mantooth Report, and The Emerging North American Union.

One very important government official in the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations, Under Secretary of State George W. Ball, spelled out very clearly what the Insiders were planning for our nation in The New York Times, 1/24/88: “If we could internationalize by using the United Nations in conjunction with the Soviet Union, because we now no longer have to fear in most cases a Soviet veto, then we could begin to transform the shape of the world and might get the U.N. back doing something useful. Sooner or later we’re going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that they’re not confined merely to the nation states. Start first on a regional, and ultimately you can move to a world, basis.” (emphasis added).

Has our education system so successfully conditioned and dumbed down Americans that they no longer are able to apply logic to the above quotes? Are they no longer capable of transferring that knowledge, processing it into new knowledge and conclusions which might help them understand and oppose the present destruction of our Constitutional Republic?

Since all regional groupings being set up around the world are based on the communistic Free Trade “redistribute the wealth” philosophy, why is it that the adjective “Communist” is never used when discussing GATT, NAFTA, CAFTA and the NAU? Those patriotic writers could at least describe those agreements as “Communism LITE,” couldn’t they?

For those Americans who recall the days of elected officials, not unelected, appointed task forces and “councils” (Soviets, according to most dictionaries), running our towns, schools, counties, states, nation, and world, recognizing this change in our form of government should not be too difficult.

However, for those younger Americans denied an education in American history and government due to the activities of the tax-exempt foundations, especially the Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie Foundations, the loss of elected officials through regionalism does not seem to bother them. Go to americandeception.com and type into search engine “Kenny Hignite” and you will see a most astonishing six-page 1954 “Test on the United States Constitution”, on which Hignite received a grade of 99 “Excellent!” There is absolutely no way that Kenny Hignite, now 66 years old, having received such an excellent education on the U.S. Constitution in a public school in Central California in 1954, would not be questioning the present deliberate destruction of our representative form of government through the implementation of Communistic regional government!

Those Americans under fifty years old, and too often those over 50 years old (!), will ask you “What’s wrong with members of the community or faceless state bureaucrats being appointed to assist our elected officials in their work which has become increasingly complicated?” The simple answer is, “if you don’t approve of what those unelected officials are doing, you can’t get rid of them at the polls.”

Uneducated Americans will also ask you:

“What’s wrong with consolidation of school districts, services, the merging of individual school and town budgets to “save taxpayers money?” (Ed note: In Maine our Senate Education Committee is about to approve Governor Baldacci’s proposal to slash school districts by proposing 26 regional school units statewide with 26 superintendents, compared to the existing 152 superintendents and 290 school units!);

“What’s wrong with merging 16 towns under one county council as was recently proposed in Cumberland County, Maine, thereby eliminating representative government?”

“What’s wrong with getting rid of local school boards and having our schools run by city Mayors, or contracting education out to private organizations connected with the corporations?”

“What possible objection could you have to public school morals and values education even if those programs are forbidden to teach “absolute” morals and values based on the Ten Commandments?”

“What’s wrong with publicly-funded charter schools which have no elected school boards?”

“What’s wrong with Cuban-style school-to-work job training replacing a K-12 liberal arts curriculum? Even if my child can’t read, I sure want him/her to be able to get a job.”

“What’s wrong with public/private partnerships?”

“What’s wrong with the federal government mandating mental health screening for my child?”

“What’s wrong with members of the community assisting the local police in monitoring citizen activities and/or the police handing out awards to citizens who do good deeds, as is the case with the Community-Oriented Policing System (COPS) in Maine?”

What’s wrong with putting the U.N.’s lifelong learning agenda, all community services (birth through death), under the umbrella of the school district? (Go to americandeception.comand type “Feld” into search engine for a remarkable research paper on the history of Community Education)

“What’s wrong with a National I.D. card reportedly designed by two Russian ex-KGB Chiefs?”

“What’s wrong with students being required to perform community service in order to graduate?”

“What’s wrong with federal funding of religious organizations (faith-based initiative)?”

“What’s wrong with federally-funded school choice proposals?”

“What’s wrong with dropping borders between states?” as is in the offing.

And, the subject of this article: “What’s wrong with regional government?” And many more, “What’s Wrong With?”questions from good Americans who have, over many years, through no fault of their own, been deliberately dumbed down and didn’t receive the public education which required the likes of Kenny Hignite to know their Constitution and form of government.

How many Americans realize that almost all the programs mentioned in the above “What’s Wrong With”section have already been implemented in our schools, communities, and states and that they are based on communist/socialist collectivist philosophy? The planners are waiting only for the full implementation of the North American Union (final nail in coffin) which will allow them to write and approve, as was done in Europe, the North American Union’s Constitution (Communist Manifesto) which will include all the above “What’s Wrong With?” programs. That will be the infamous day when the U.S. Constitution is formally relegated to history’s trash bin. And, as with the EU Constitution, or the Communist Manifesto, the practice of Christianity will be outlawed a thing of the past. All religions will be considered equal and inevitably superior to Christianity. Go to americandeception.com and type into search engine “Religion and Governance” an important position paper by Harlan Cleveland, notorious supporter of global government, long-time member of the internationalist Aspen Institute, and first U.S. Ambassador to the Common Market (1960), and Marc Luycx, a Belgian change agent bureaucrat. This paper was prepared by the Foreward Study Group of the European Commission and was undoubtedly used by those drafting the EU Constitution. It will give you a picture of the non-role of Christianity in world region constitutions.

Our elected officials in Congress, who have sworn to uphold the Constitution, should not be immune to multi-million dollar lawsuits for injuries sustained by the citizens of this country. Is not the loss of our freedoms due to elected officials� malpractice (lying to us in regard to putting us under the communistic regional North American Union and not holding hearings on the subject) even more important than the death of one patient due to a doctor�s malpractice, the scalding of a woman who spilled her �too-hot� coffee at a McDonald�s takeout, or the death from cancer of a woman who smoked too many cigarettes? How can we ignore the fact that 651,008 Americans have died in battle to protect and defend the constitutional freedoms which will vanish under this new international regional arrangement? Is there really no penalty to be exacted of these highly-paid Congressional traitors other than voting them out of office, which it seems is impossible to do due to both political parties having the same agenda, controlled media, manipulated political conventions, and election fraud?

Americans have been conditioned to NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, since the days of McCarthyism and the phony fall of communism, mention the “C” word. The word must, as George Orwell might have said, be removed from the dictionaries of all languages, especially English. Otherwise, we might wise up and tackle this treason with all our might and brains since we surely don’t want our children and grandchildren living under any “ism” form of government, much less”Communism”. The Insiders know that “Communism” is the one and only word that must be banished from use. They are not concerned over excellent anti-North American Union rantings and ravings as long as the “C” word is NOT used.

The Insiders, most if not all of whom are corporate communists, have no fear of the coming totalitarian system since they have been assured they will be sitting in the catbird seat, having eliminated all economic competition and self-government (elected officials), and will have the world as their playground. The majority of the world’s population, the Insiders’ human resources, will be their highly trained and conditioned serfs, lifelong.

One might ask, how can this be? It is a well-known and documented fact that Wall Street funded the Bolshevik Revolution and the corporate Communists and our government have been supporting the Communist regime in Russia since 1917. Extensive exchange agreements covering political, municipal, cultural, economic, legal, law enforcement, education, science, sports, medicine, etc. have been signed since 1958 between the USSR and the USA, including of special importance the 1985 education agreements signed by Presidents Reagan and Gorbachev which merged our two education systems and caused to be implemented the Soviet polytechnical work force/job quota system and the Pavlovian outcomes-based method of conditioning/training. Go to americandeception.comfor full text of “Agreement between U.S.A. and USSR”.

Regionalism is communism no matter how you slice it. The sooner Americans get that unpleasant fact permanently entered into their brains, and process that information into appropriate action, the sooner we will be able to escape what Orwell described so well in his novel 1984:

“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on the human face–forever…and remember, that is forever.”

Forward this article to your friends and to your elected officials at the local, state, and national level. Of equal importance restore the “C” word to your vocabulary and use it often.

2007 Charlotte T. Iserbyt – All Rights Reserved

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

While anti-Zionism provides a beneficial use for Jewry and their Communist empire, so too does so called anti-Semitism.

It seems that the Elders of Zion (Chabad Lubavitch) and their ever advancing international Communist intelligence network have used anti-Zionism (Soviet Operation SIG) to control the Left and “anti-Semitism” to control not only the Right but their “lesser brethren” Jews as well.

In this article, we shall explore the following key aspects for the seemingly paradoxical use of a controlled anti-Semitism in the establishment of a Jewish Soviet world superstate. (If you are new to this theory, please start by reading The Kremlin directs the anti-Zionist movement on behalf of Jewry and get yourself acquainted with the Operation SIG index.)

*Herein, when I say “genuine anti-Semitism”, I mean anti-Judaism, for lack of a better term. When I refer to Communism, Soviet, or Jewry, I regard them as more or less the same thing, since Communism is a distinctly Jewish idea.

A carefully managed anti-Semitism helps to:

1. Create greater cohesion within and loyalty from the international Jewish community.
2. Create alibis for crypto-Jewish and pro-Jewish gentile agents of influence.
3. Draw out and, thereby, neutralize genuine “anti-Semites”.
4. Manage genuine anti-Semitic groups in directions favourable to the managers.
5. Coverup the most damning elements of the Jewish world conspiracy.

Jewish cohesion

In The Tragedy of Anti-Semitism, authors A.K. Chesterton and Joseph Leftwichh posit the question, “would I be wrong if I were to suggest that a measure of anti-Semitism, where there is the assurance that it will be properly controlled, does help to promote Jewish solidarity and, therefore, constitutes a strong counter to Jewish indifference and schism?” They conclude, “while non-Jews have nothing to gain from anti-Semitism, it is just possible that the Jews themselves have much to gain from it.” Astonishingly, the authors go on to conclude that rather than anti-Semitism being the greatest threat to the existence of Jewry, a lack of it is the real threat. These are plausible arguments. The Jewish and, especially, the overwhelmingly Jewish-controlled mainstream press of the world’s media seek out and over publicize any and every instance of so called anti-Semitism they can, no matter how small. And on those seemingly rare occasions where anti-Semitism is not taking place, the Jewish community invents one, as evidenced in the multiple anti-Semitic hate crime hoaxes, where many Jews have been caught staging so called attacks on themselves and other Jews (see the Hate Crime Hoaxes index). Those wayward Jews indifferent to the international Jewish cause can suddenly identify with an idea when they are presented with anti-Semitism as being a personal danger and their “brothers” being persecuted. This can provide them with more meaning in life, which is a very powerful thing. Authentic or not, the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion admitted to a controlled anti-Semitism all the way back in the late 19th century. The “wisemen” revealed that “their anti-Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren” (Protocol 9:2).

The alibi

A controlled anti-Semitism can provide a necessary cover to crypto-Jewish and pro-Jewish gentile agents facing suspicion, like in the case of late Russian-Jewish oligarch Vladimir Zhirinovsky. After all, who would suspect a “dirty anti-Semite” of being Jewish or aiding the Jewish cause? It seems that the KGB gives a certain degree of flexibility to the depth that these fake anti-Semites can go in facilitating the illusion that they are genuine anti-Semites. Russian President Vladimir Putin can create an alibi merely by saying, in an off-hand remark, that many of the Bolsheviks were Jewish, while other kosher anti-Semites, like E. Michael Jones and David Duke take it much further. David Duke, one of the most publicized so called called anti-Semites in recent history, may not be Jewish, but he serves the Jewish cause through portraying Russia and the Eastern Bloc as being based and anti-Jewish, when the opposite is true. A Jones and Duke associate named Aleksandr Dugin (an admitted kabbalist) was part of the controlled anti-Semitic group Pamyat. High ranking Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn revealed that Pamyat and its associates were KGB creations. “It also explains the emergence of groups of Russian nationalists, inheritors of the Slavophile tradition, Stalinists, and even anti-Semites represented by Pamyat (memory): all are controlled by the Party and are being used in the interests of the strategy to play on Western hopes and fears.” (page 101, The Perestroika Deception). There are many controlled “anti-Semites”, too many to list here, but they are almost exclusively present on the Right.

With the KGB and the Sanhedrin pursuing the same goal using anti-Semitism, where does one end and the other begin?

The Trust

Humans have a tendency to associate with those who are most like them, especially when it comes to ideology. The Soviet strategists were intuitive enough to realize that they could surface and eliminate authentic anti-Semites and anti-Communists (more or less the same thing) if they could somehow get them to associate with their fake, controlled anti-Semites. The strategy is especially challenging when the targets are already marginalized and reluctant to share views prohibited by law (thought crime—anti-Semitism was a crime in the USSR and authentic anti-Semitism is more or less outlawed in most countries today in one form or another). In Chekisty: a History of the KGB, author John J. Dziak referring to the Soviet Trust deception writes, “where no internal opposition organization exists, a security service might invent one—both to infiltrate the more dangerous organizations abroad in order to blunt or channel their actions and to surface real or potential internal dissidents. If an internal opposition already exists, it will be infiltrated in an attempt to control it, to provoke opponents into exposing themselves, and to cause the movement to serve state interests.”

Misdirection

The previous quote by John J. Dziak leads us into another use for controlled anti-Semism, and that is to control and direct anti-Semitic groups that can’t be eliminated immediately. Jewish-Soviet power seeks to eliminate or infiltrate all genuine anti-Semitic groups and keep its own fake ones in play to misdirect all future lone genuine anti-Semites looking for a group with which to associate. It’s an ongoing, long-range operation. This strategy is most effective when a genuine anti-Semitic group operates under the belief that is not being externally controlled. Though said group may not wittingly be advancing the Jewish cause, they end up doing so. This can create confusion to the outside observer when trying to decipher genuine from controlled groups. Caution must be taken in these situations.

A Limited Hangout

If we apply the Limited Hangout concept to Soviet-Jewish strategy of controlled anti-Semitism, we can see how beneficial it can be to the Sanhedrin. A Limited Hangout is a counter-intelligence strategy of using a deliberately leaked piece of information to divert the target’s attention away from the potential discovery of a much more dangerous piece of information. Operation SIG is perfect for this. Anti-Zionism itself is a limited hangout in that it distracts from the nuts and bolts of the authentic Jewish question that has spanned centuries. Another example of a Soviet-Jewish limited hangout might be the deliberately laid out breadcrumbs linking Israeli intelligence (Mossad) to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It wasn’t very obvious at first because it seemed that the research organically led to Mossad, but in hindsight, an honest observer must admit that those elements of the public not satisfied with either the official or inside-job theories, were led to believe Mossad was behind it. While Mossad likely played a role, along with elements of the U.S. establishment, the evidence suggests that Moscow was the guiding hand behind this conspiracy. Someone may object and say, “hey, Tim, how can that be when Mossad is Jewish and Russia is not?” Jewish power is centred in the Soviet system, not in Israel; therefore, Israel can be  used (is “indispensable”, as the Elders of Zion word it) to conceal the Soviet hidden hand without posing a significant threat to Jewish power. Zionism, an idea, is on the hook for anything Israel does, not Jewry itself. In contrast with genuine anti-Semitism, which is typically believed by those on the Right, anti-Zionism typically is adopted by Leftists, though that has changed in the last couple of decades as more and more form the Right, bewildered, have adopted anti-Zionism thinking it is a valid form of genuine anti-Semitism.

Why the Soviet-Jewish regime puts such a massive amount of energy, resources, and capital into controlling anti-Semitism proves that genuine anti-Semitism is a huge threat to their power and their plans for a world Communist system. This explains why genuine anti-Semitism is outlawed in Soviet countries and why controlled anti-Semitism was honed in Soviet countries.They must maintain control of it at any cost, even sometimes to themselves.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
December 23, 2023

While many believe that the Soviets were behind the assassination attempt on Pope John Paul II, insights by Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn indicate that they were not behind it but they did use it to their advantage.

Golitsyn provides several reasons why the Soviets, contrary to popular belief, did not orchestrate the assassination attempt on Polish-born Karol Józef Wojtyła (“Saint” Pope John Paul II) on May 13, 1981. Golitsyn’s theory makes sense. It seems even more plausible when we interpret this assassination attempt under the belief that a). John Paul II was a Communist agent seeking to undermine the Church from within, and b). Poland’s break with the Soviet Union and path to independence was a farce as part of Soviet long-range deception.

Aside from Pope Francis, many believe Wojtyła was one of the worst or even most heretical popes in the Church’s 2,000+ year history. If it is true that John Paul II’s papacy was in line with the Communist agenda, then it would make no sense for the Soviets to assassinate him and would make perfect sense to portray him as an anti-Communist in order to hide his true role as a Soviet subverter.

Here are Golitsyn’s points on the matter, taken from his first book New Lies For Old (1984), pgs. 352-354, published a mere two years after the assassination attempt:

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Sept. 16, 2023 Anno Domini

A couple of months ago, a 79-year-old FBI double agent and American traitor was found dead in his prison cell of 21 years.

Robert Hannsen, a devotee of a powerful pseudo conservative cult inside the Catholic Church known as Opus Dei, had ended up in his daily 23-hour solitary confinement by betraying his country for a bag of silver from the KGB. He betrayed the FBI and also his Catholic wife, not only by leading a double life as a KGB spy but also by allowing his friend to watch him and his wife having sex.[i]

Ironically, the traitor had been known to accuse the Russians of being Godless, though he was serving their interests. Supposedly, this Godlessness is what provoked the Opus Dei to eventually set up shop in the “former” Soviet Union some five years after Hanssen initially was imprisoned. The corrupt KGB-installed Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill, agent “Mikhailov”, was more than happy to welcome to new “Catholic” outreach, which set up the Opus Dei Centre in Moscow on June 26, 2007.

“The vice president of the Department of Foreign Ecclesial Affairs of the Patriarchate of Moscow, Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin, welcomed the personal prelature of Opus Dei, which recently opened a community in Russia, and said its energy and fidelity ‘to Christian ideals are worthy of great respect’… The vicar for Opus Dei in Moscow, Father Jose Antonio Senovilla Garcia, said his community has gone to Russia ‘to encourage the people to be good orthodox believers, to find God in their daily lives and to help others’.”[ii]

If the Moscow Patriarchate is OK with the Dei’s presence in Russia, then so is the Kremlin, then so is the KGB, then so is the Communist International (COMINTERN); meanwhile, authentic Catholic teaching is considered hostile to the Eurasian-oriented crypto Soviet state.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s “brain” and prophet Aleksandr Dugin, a middle aged occultist managing controlled opposition “conservatives” in Western nations has admitted the real neo-Soviet and fiercely anti-Catholic views of the Kremlin and the Communist International. However, these admissions can only be found on Russian language sites.

“Destroy Catholicism from within, strengthen Freemasonry.[iii] Both they (New World Order) and we (Eurasians) want to deprive you of your Catholicism; Orthodoxy…is much closer to what we call paganism.[iv] I think the best thing in Polish history is the Jewish tradition in small towns in eastern Poland. Actually, I am interested in everything that was anti-Catholic in Poland: Polish freemasons and occultists, Jan Potocki and Hoene-Wroński, Mienżyński and Dzerzhinsky … They all chose the Eurasian path.[v]”

If Dugin’s views on Catholicism are an indication of the Kremlin’s, then we can be certain that the neo-Soviet state’s permission of Catholic churches in its country are for show and are closely monitored for compliance with the state agenda—as it is also with the Russian Orthodox Church and all other religions, especially Islam.

Before Opus Dei officially entered Russia, all the way back in 1991—the year the Soviets successfully fooled the world that Soviet Communism had collapsed, one Father Myron Effing of Evansville, Indiana (E. Michael Jones’ home state) had brought his Catholic mission to the Red Empire but on the opposite end of the country in the geopolitically significant city of Vladivostok. It shares borders with China, Japan, and North Korea. Although Effing’s Vlad mission (Mary Mother of God Mission Society) doesn’t overtly claim affiliation with the cult, Opus Dei made a rather interesting prediction in 2011.

“…but it is for God first of all, who has brought us to that beloved country, Russia, through St Josemaria’s prayers. How much he prayed for your country, how much he prayed for you! In union with his regard, I am sure we will reach from St Petersburgh to Vladivostok, doing a wonderful apostolate which will bring forth not only Numerary Assistants but Numeraries, Associates, and Supernumeraries, lots of them….”[vi]

Why does Opus Dei consider Russia beloved? Most of its authentic Christians were murdered off during the Red Terror.

In a November 1, 2012 newsletter put out by Effing and his Vlad Mission, a reference was made to Opus Dei which may suggest an affiliation. During the mission’s 16^th annual Far Eastern Catholic Youth Conference, Effing describes an activity where participants were to choose a saint to study and promote for a week.

“The ‘green’ group got St. Josemaria Escriva, the founder of Opus Dei”.[vii]

Effing joins the modernists in their declaration for both Escriva and Pope John Paul II as saints. This isn’t really surprising when you consider that Effing utilizes the highly popular Protestant “Alpha Course” in his mission. Is he an ecumenist in the spirit of Vatican II or is the Alpha covertly Catholic somehow?

Father Effing happens to have as a member of his Vlad Mission the daughter-in-law of pro-Kremlin author and Culture Wars editor Eugene Michael Jones of South Bend Indiana (an Opus Dei centre). Anna Gafurova Jones was the Mission’s first parish organist and choir director. Her mother, Ludmilla Rakhmanova, is a charter member of the mission’s choir and serves as professor of dramatics at The Far Eastern Art Institute in Vladivostok.

“Ludmilla is the director of all operas produced in Vladivostok, a position in which she has worked at one time or another with most of the classical musicians in the Russian Far East….”

It’s unclear how one of E. Michael Jones’ sons would’ve met a Russka from Russia’s far East. But it seems fitting that such a thing should happen given Jones’ unwavering support for the Kremlin and its neo-Soviet satellites, especially Iran, whom Jones can’t seem to love and promote enough.

Although Russia pretends that it has dropped Communism—something which Father Effing seems to believe or at least echo, it maintains strict control over academia, religion, and especially Western influence. It’s difficult to imagine all Catholic Churches in Russia operating without state approval. “So long as no one ventures off the path we have laid out, you may have a presence here,” it seems. This is how it is in Red China, where the state even appoints its own “Catholic” bishops without consent from the Vatican. Catholic presence in Russia helps create the illusion that it is an open society and has, indeed, parted with its Soviet ways. More importantly, perhaps, is that it allows the neo-Soviets easier access to the Church and a means by which to spread its errors right into the heart of the Church and in Catholic nations.

If Catholic presence in Russia is strictly controlled by the crypto-Soviet regime, then what does that say of Opus Dei’s presence there?

According to a mysterious book called Opus Judei published in Colombia in 2000, Opus Dei is a subversive Judeo-masonic organization bent on destroying the Catholic Church from within.[viii] This incredible book seems to be legitimate, as it provides many details which only an insider would seem to have and comes to logical conclusions (to corroborate its conclusions, see my dossier on Opus Dei). If you haven’t seen my dossier on E. Michael Jones, which suggests that he is chasing the same Judeo-masonic-Bolshevist goals as Opus Dei, please browse through it. While Opus Dei uses the front as a traditional, conservative Catholic organization, Jones uses the front of anti-Judaism. However, when you dissect the Jones character enough, you realize that he is actually only anti-Zionist and doesn’t seem to oppose the Kabbalistic and perennialist elements of the Christ-denying cult. He seems to be using anti-Judaism to appeal to his traditional Catholic audience so that he can then secretly inject his Marxist, Russia-is-the-saviour poison into them. Incidentally, Jones is a favourite among the schismatic Eastern Orthodox, like with Estonian Monk Seraphim. Iranian convert to Eastern Orthodoxy Roosh V (Daryush Valizadeh) credits Jones with his conversion. Strange that a so called traditional Catholic is inspiring others to convert to Eastern Orthodoxy—the dominant church in the “former” Communist countries of Eastern Europe and Russia.

Jones has publicly denied being a member of Opus Dei; however, according to the above mentioned Opus Judei book, members—much like Freemasons—tend to obfuscate their membership in order to deceive the public.

“Lieutenant General Fernando Rodrigo Cifuentes made the following statements when referring to Opus Dei: ‘As a military man, I consider the high commitments that the military man has contracted with the nation to be totally in conflict with any other commitments that are undoubtedly contracted by accepting the regulations of a secret association, since its work of recruitment and action is secret.’ (35) Colonel Antonio Sánchez Cámara said: ‘Many, many members of Opus Dei, if asked directly, deny their membership. Opus Dei is something closed, and I like open spaces.’”[ix]

Jones’ publishing company, Fidelity Press, shares some suspicious characteristics with Opus Dei. As it happens, “fidelity” is a significant word in the Opus Dei cult.

“After proselytism and recruitment, come the VOWS, which at first are taken for one year and renewed for five—the so-called “Oblation”; the next step is the juridical incorporation into the Work, which is called “Fidelity”—the culmination of the process of depersonalization.”[x]

On top of that, Jones has as his logo for his Fidelity Press an encircled cross with what appears to be a rose emerging from behind it. This is exactly the Opus Dei’s main symbol. The Opus Judei author claims the rose and empty cross (as opposed to a proper Catholic crucifix) are Kabbalistic in meaning (perhaps also Rosicrucian in origin?).

“The symbol of the rose is a very important part of the Hebrew Kabbalistic tradition. (99) Already in the psalms and in the Jewish prophetic poems, the red rose and the white rose personify the punished and purified bodies of Israel. But in the Kabbalah it goes even further on the path of meanings. The Tree, sephirotic, divided into three vertical columns, has the central one precisely under the invocation of the rose, which in this way restores and balances the rigorous and severe part of creation -left- with its clement and merciful side -right-.”[xi]

“The members of Opus Dei carry, in their pockets, crosses without the body of Christ. Of the crucified Son of God, the Work accepts and recognizes as its own only an empty wooden cross. The camouflaged reasons given by Escrivá are that the naked bodies of Jesus Christ are usually badly made and repugnant. The crucifix is the symbol of faith. The wood, the Calvary where the Jews exercised their deicide.

It is a custom and compulsory rule that in every center or house of Opus Dei “there is a black cross without Christ, which will be decorated twice a year. (102) These heterodox practices have been censured as well as their secrecy, as their thumb is placed on their lips.

If to the bare cross we add the rose we have the rose-cross. Kabbalistic alchemy could not be more explicit and perfect.”[xii]

(These are just some of Jones’ connections to Opus Judei. See more in Randy Engel’s article All the men behind the Opus Dei curtain.)

One might conclude from Engel’s article that both Michael Voris of Church Militant (also pro-Kremlin) and Eugene Michael Jones of Fidelity Press couldn’t possibly both be Opus Dei members since they are feuding with each other over Jones supposedly breaking the confessional seal by exposing Voris’ homosexual past. Again, we turn to Opus Judei for a possible answer.

“Judas the Iscariot has gone down in history not because of his possible virtues as an apostle of Jesus Christ, but because of the secret denunciation he made of his Master that led to the arrest of the Messiah. In such a compact and hermetic circle as Opus Dei is, everyone wants to be an informer, a public and private accuser, a snitch, a confidant of their own closest brothers and sisters. There are various reasons for this, including the fact that informing on the truth in Opus Dei is a practice and a “virtue” so that the followers always live in an atmosphere of mutual and reciprocal distrust, fear, insecurity and isolation, all of which are extremely important for keeping the sect member in chains, in a permanent manner.

Opus Dei pays careful attention to what it calls constant and persistent spiritual direction, which binds and marks each and every one of its members. This is complemented, on a weekly basis, by what it calls “sharing of confidences”, which helps to configure a rigid hierarchical-spiritual order.

On the other hand, the denunciation of the brother by the brother, the embarrassment and shame of being singled out by one’s nearest neighbor, is a rule and an obligation laid down in the statutes and regulations of the Work itself. It is a common and habitual practice, fomented, encouraged and praised by those in charge of the organization.

…

But if sharing of confidences can be disturbing, no less so is public denouncement, the evidence in which they must also, weekly, leave each other, like Judas, but in this case the reward is not thirty denarii of silver, but holiness and heaven in eternity. Public accusation and repression is an unavoidable and inexcusable duty, as laid down in the very Constitutions of Opus Dei which, in article 270, stipulates that ‘The numerary members and the Oblates will meet every week for the brief circle where defects are corrected, where the means of apostolate are proposed and where everything that can guide our spirit and our specific action is dealt with in a familiar way’. Every member must submit or be called to order.”[xiii]

During his time with the FBI and as an Opus Dei member, traitor Robert Hannsen spent time in Gary, Indiana and Chicago, Illinois—just a stone’s throw from Eugene Michael Jones in South Bend. Because the mid-West is a hotbed of Opus Dei activity, one wonders if these two characters ever crossed paths while shilling for the Kremlin and possibly working for Opus Dei.

Notes:

[i] Leonard, Tom, The sordid truth of FBI mole Robert Hanssen’s private perversions… how the Soviet spy let a friend secretly watch him and his wife having SEX – all while he was betraying his country, Daily Mail, June 7, 2023 – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12170269/How-Soviet-spy-FBI-agent-Robert-Hanssen-invited-friend-watch-wife-having-SEX.html

[ii] Catholic News Agency, Patriarchate of Moscow welcomes Opus Dei presence in Russia, Dec. 18, 2007 – https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/11307/patriarchate-of-moscow-welcomes-opus-dei-presence-in-russia

[iii] Radio Spada, Reflections on some words by A. Dugin, April 19, 2023 – https://www.radiospada.org/2023/04/distruggere-il-cattolicesimo-dallinterno-rafforzare-la-massoneria-riflessioni-su-alcune-parole-di-a-dugin/

[iv] Fronda, Alexander Dugin: I am waiting for Ivan the Terrible, March 1998 – https://www.fronda.pl/a/aleksander-dugin-czekam-na-iwana-groznego,45653.html

[v] ibid

[vi] Echevarria, Javier, “The driving force for the apostolic work”, Opus Dei, Nov. 29, 2011 – https://opusdei.org/en-ca/article/the-driving-force-for-the-apostolic-work/

[vii] Vladivostok Sunrise, Issue Number One Hundred Eight, November 1, 2012, pg. 4

[viii] Opus Judei, 2000, Bogota, Columbia – http://www.reductio.net/OpusJudei-Index.html

[ix] Ibid, Ch. 1, part 3

[x] Ibid, Ch. 1, part 7

[xi] Ibid, Ch. 3, part 4

[xii] Ibid

[xiii] Ibid, Ch. 1, part 14