“The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.” —Aristotle
By Timothy Fitzpatrick
January 6, 2026
Count on the Communists to legitimize innovative ways of theft to a dumbed down population in order to achieve their goal of a planet of obedient slaves to their rule.
For nearly a hundred years now, the white European Christian nations have been subject to intensive shaming for their achievement and excellence under the guise that white ingroup preference is racist (automatically assumed to be a bad thing), even though non-white racial ingroup preference is not deemed racist and is, in fact, encouraged nowadays.
The exact origins of the term “racist” are disputed, but it is a modern term that developed starting in the late 19thcentury—the time of the explosion of socialist movements. Lev Brontstein (Leon Trotsky) was among the first to use this term. Regardless of how and why it came about, one thing is absolutely clear: it has been completely weaponized to exact theft on its unsuspecting target.
There are also religious and racialist motives behind the idea of anti-racism, but for the purpose of this article, I will adhere mainly to its economic motive.
This article will be based on the belief that while all races of humanity are equal before God and the law, all races are not equal in terms of their proclivities and achievement. This is a reality that is backed by science and logic and has been, up until the 20th century, acknowledged by mainstream anthropology. The racialist theories of old have been memory holed and suppressed since the cultural-Marxist takeover of academia during the early 1900s through the Boasian revolution. Those in the West who don’t believe in this science and logic will have to learn through the school of hard knocks the deleterious proclivities of the non-white races, especially of the equatorial races. They are learning this reality right now as the West is being invaded by endless waves of Third World gangs.
There will be some who will attempt to pigeonhole the position in this article as being an appeal to National Socialism (Nazism) out of ignorance or ill will, but that is not the case. Nazism is a creation of the very same socialists who have weaponized the idea of “racism”. While Nazism did embrace some truths regarding race, it was deliberately distorted and accelerated to absurd ends that appear to have been done—through a carefully orchestrated drama of dialectics—expressly to discredit legitimate racialist theories and to discredit white European Christian peoples as part of a long-range setup for eventual extinction of said peoples.
The economic aspect of the Communist weaponization of “racism” involves targeting the races with the greatest achievement (e.g. white Europeans, Japanese, etc.) and their resultant higher incomes. Once targeted, the Communists then attempt to exploit potential public sentiment of resentment and jealousy from the lower-achieving races. Where it cannot find a natural point of contention with which to exploit, it will invent one. “Genocide” is probably their most useful point of exploitation, as it requires little or no proof due to its highly emotional context. Merely the accusation of “genocide”, with endless cycles in the Communist-compliant mass media, is usually enough to exploit the lower-achieving races’ sentiments towards the higher (the recent narrative in Canada of a so-called genocide of Indian residential school children is a good example, as this narrative has absolutely no proof, and its proponents use the defense that “evil inquisitors” demanding proof is evidence enough). Another useful tactic of exploitation is to accuse the higher-achieving races of the deliberately vague “crime” of colonialism. By automatically labelling colonialism a crime or wrong, any discussion weighing the possible merits of colonialism (which, in reality, far outweigh the negatives) is bypassed in the minds of the unthinking mob. Then, of course, there is the charge of racism. The Communists understand human psychology and know of our natural inclination to ingroup preference. When groups are being invaded by outgroups, especially hostile racial outgroups, opposition or resistance is a natural reaction. It is not necessarily bad or good but just a natural reaction to a potential threat to the ingroup. The Communists then exploit this reaction by vilifying it as something unnatural and bad. That is where the term “racism” is so useful to the Communists. They know that the higher-achieving races generally have no interest in living in lower-achieving racial communities/countries. The reverse is usually the case. So, there is little or no threat to the Communists’ racist smear being used by the higher-achieving races against the lower (something that would be counterproductive to the Communist cause), due to the fact that the higher-achieving races are usually content in their higher-achieving societies and find lower-achieving societies repulsive, at least to some degree. Furthermore, even if a white European attempted to prosecute a non-white person for hate or racism, the courts would doubtlessly dismiss it as laughable. Try to find a prosecution anywhere in the world. You would be hard pressed to find even a few, if any. “Racism”, then, becomes a smear exclusively geared toward the higher-achieving races, mostly white Europeans. A proof of this is that even though all races have ingroup preference, the majority of so called hate crimes prosecuted around the world see an overwhelming majority of white European-derived peoples incarcerated or penalized for such “crimes”, whether it’s through human rights tribunals or criminal court proceedings.
Before getting into the avenues through which the Communists carry out organized theft from the higher-achieving (usually capitalists) in society using anti-racism, it should be noted that higher-achieving races generally have higher IQs, lower impulsivity, and greater high-investment parenting (especially in the case of Christians) and, with it, higher incomes and more stored wealth. Additionally, the higher-achieving races tend to have more wealth because of their ability to save and exercise wiser financial decisions; whereas, the lower-achieving races have less wherewithal to save, make poorer financial decisions, and, thus, tend to squander their wealth. Strategically, the Communists know that even if they have to steal from the saver races and give some or all of it to the spender races (as happens in the case of the dialectical process), that wealth will eventually wind up in their hands (Covid is a good example this dialectical process. The lower-achieving in society were flushed with free government [taxpayer-provided] cash and most of it went right back into the system by mass spending through corporate “big box” shopping. It was a transfer of wealth that has lingering effects today.)
- Reparations/Reconciliation. Anti-racist-based reparations became a big thing right after the Second World War, with huge swathes of cash being extorted from the pockets of individual Europeans based on what the Nazis did. Hitler was Stalin’s dialectical proxy, so this was quite the con on Europe, especially on the German people. Nevertheless, European governments were on the hook and the taxpayers were fleeced by a slick public relations campaign that foisted collective guilt on the white masses. This Soviet-Jewish-invented scam has culminated in the reconciliation scam in Canada, where white Canadians are being shamed into giving up their wealth in order to reconcile past conceived evils against the so called indigenous (really, Siberian or Eurasian transplants) by their white ancestors. Yes, that’s right, whites must pay for what their ancestors allegedly did. These kinds of narratives are floating all over the West right now in order to loot white European peoples. Count on this narrative being expanded. Any number of victim groups can be invented and hyped by the media in order to further the grift of white European capitalists.
- Unfettered migration. Capitalist white European nations are being told by the media and their treasonous leaders that they must accept indefinite amounts of migrants from Third World countries and that they must financially support them (through subsidies, taxpayer-funded programs, welfare, etc.). If the people show any kind of resistance to this scam, that would be an expression of racism. A great example of this scam is England, where the authorities have implemented draconian speech measures to curb the massive resistance by white Anglos to the Third Worldizaton of their country. The largely African and Arab hordes come into England, live entirely on the backs of the taxpayers, while they commit crimes and rape and murder the locals. Like with the reparation scam, the migration scam is being perpetrated all throughout the West. Nowhere seems to be immune, not even Japan. Fundamentally, it is yet another Communist looting operation.
- Anti-Colonialism. In the led up to world Communist governance, count on anti-colonialism become a bigger and bigger deal, especially where anti-racism loses its credibility. It was spawned by the anti-racism scam and is another tier of exploitation with which to steal from white Europeans. While the reparations scam tends to victimize one specific ethnic group, anti-Colonialism can be used more generally and with even less evidence to validate it. It’s meaning is much vaguer than anti-racism and, thus, easier to use to bludgeon whitey into submission. Anti-colonialists are led to believe that whites are oppressive, exploitative, and genocidal; and any state that whites have founded or been involved with is based on this. Therefore, it must be undone and evil whitey must forfeit his supposed ill-gotten gains. Communist-run South Africa is an example of this scam, where whitey has his land confiscated and, if he isn’t careful, his life is also taken. The current theft from and murder of white South Africans is being carried out under the perfumed, decorated banner of anti-Colonialism. Additionally, anti-colonialism can be used to demonize more than just white Europeans. It can be used against anyone participating in a white, capitalist society. Non-white capitalists, be forewarned.
Apart from more overt forms of Communism/socialism, these seem to be the primary ways the Communists are stealing wealth from the world’s highest achievers. In the led up to world Communist governance, expect these tactics to intensify. They might even invent some new ones.


I heard this a while back….
Someone once asked me if I was in favor of reparations for African-Americans.
I said of course not: there is no way the black community could ever repay the damage for all the murders, rapes and welfare of the last 200 years.
Jokes aside, great article Tim.
I would like to add an honorary #4
All the affirmative action/DEI make work BS for minorities.
Here in Cali government contracts all have preferential awarding for Minority owned businesses. So yeah if your a minority you get the contract, not the native hard working white man.