Alex Jones, freemasonry, and the cult of Constitution

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

With Alex Jones’ compromising Jewish connections now thoroughly documented, it’s not surprising to learn that Alex Jones consistently advocates specifically masonic concepts to his listeners.

Jones’s entire defense against the New World Order is based on the United States Constitution in the spirit of Founding Fathers like Thomas Jefferson and so called patriots like Paul Revere, both of whom were probable freemasons—both fighting each other within the purview of the Jewish kabbalist Hegelian dialectic (thesis + anti-thesis = synthesis [alchemical magic]). Jones apparently has no qualms about boldly declaring repeatedly on his daily radio show and in his documentaries that “the answer to 1984 is 1776.” I guess he sees no correlation between the Masonic founding of the United States of the America and the founding of the Jewish-Masonic Order of the Illuminati in Bavaria the same year. Perhaps it is a deceptive NLP technique of cryptically uplifting the date as it pertains to the Illuminati and their Enlightenment cult which paved the way for liberty, fraternity, and equality in the new world.

The Judeo-Masonic roots of the US founding fathers and the Constitution
Freemasonry, hatched in the British Empire following the Enlightenment-Rosicrucian revolutionary overthrow of the Catholic Church in England, is the proxy arm of the international Jewish conspiracy against Christ and His Saints.
Throughout the centuries, the Jewish conspirators have struggled to refrain from publicly gloating of their engineering of this proxy movement.

Jews have entirely created Masonry to corrupt the nations of Christian civilization and to propagate behind this veil the general revolution which is to bring about the domination of Israel. It is simply a tool and a means in the hands of the Jews. In support of this, we can quote the article of Dr. Isaac M. Wise published in the Israelite of America, 3 August, 1866: ‘Masonry is a Jewish institution, whose history, degrees, charges, passwords, and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end.’[I]

This conspiracy to “corrupt the nations” was executed under the cover of “Enlightenment” progress and freedom.
The Masonic Illuminati slogan is “liberty, fraternity, and equality”, which was shouted from rooftops as revolutionaries raped, pillaged, and murdered their way through France.

There are many instances where high-level Jews have admitted their leading role in the formation, development, and pursuits of freemasonry, the pinnacle of which being the bloody French and Russian revolutions. Revolution was the Jewish attempt at overthrowing Christ and His influence over Europe and Russia. But what many Americans may not know is that this same Jewish-masonic revolution was brought to the new world in the guise of liberty and freedom. The Statue of Liberty, made by French mason Frederic-Auguste Bartholdi and erected in New York’s harbor, was freemasonic France’s gift to the Founding Fathers and their spreading of masonic Enlightenment thought in the new world. The new world’s state religion of liberty, equality, and fraternity was eventually codified in the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution. Don’t let the term “enlightenment” fool you. Their concept is the same as illumination—out of darkness comes the light through man’s acquisition of knowledge (gnosticism) and self-elevation through Enlightenment-Newtonian-occult science (magic) . This is false enlightenment. And it shows that the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion …”, is a lie. This is why Americans have national monuments in honour of freemasons, obelisks in honour of pagan gods, the Great Seal of the United States in honour of Horus, and why the masons built America’s first cities on occult ley lines (America’s major cities along the Eastern seaboard are in perfect alignment with Stonehenge).

Historian E. Michael Jones writes of John Locke and the British masonic Enlightenment thinkers who inspired the US Founding Fathers,

These groups shared a common hatred of French Catholic Absolutism. They differed on how to deal with the common enemy. For a moderate like Locke, the answer was constitutionalism. Men of good will and property should unite in free association and establish rules to live as free and equal citizens. The Masonic Lodge hovered in the background of this discussion as the model for the new Protestant polity.[II]

The 20th century’s most profound occultist, Manly Palmer Hall, explains in his book The Secret Destiny of America (1944) that the seemingly Christian language used by the US Founding Fathers and in documents such as the Declaration of Independence is a deception:

The rise of the Christian Church broke up the intellectual pattern of the classical pagan world. By persecution of this pattern’s ideologies it drove the secret societies into greater secrecy; the pagan intellectuals then reclothed their original ideas in a garment of Christian phraseology, but bestowed the keys of the symbolism only upon those duly initiated and bound to secrecy by their vows. (Chapter 7, The Democratic Tradition Preserved by Secret Societies)

Jacob Cats’ Lampado Trado depicts John Dee, who many believe founded Rosicrucianism and Freemasonry in England, passes the light of illumination to Francis Bacon. Bacon was to bring this “light” to the new world (America).

Remarkably, Hall credits the establishment of the 13 US colonies (note that 13 is of occult significance) to 17th century kabbalist Francis Bacon:

The Alchemists, Cabalists, Mystics, and Rosicrucians were the incisive instruments of Bacon’s plan. Representatives of these groups migrated to the colonies at an early date and set up their organization in suitable places. (Ch. 13)

The Seven Noahide Laws of the Babylonian Jewish Talmud, a racist and highly dictatorial book that blasphemes our Lord Jesus Christ among other things, is entrenched in the United States law, included in the fifteen capital laws of New England and incorporated into US Public Law 102-14 March 26, 1991 as “Education Day.” The Noahide Laws are veiled in benevolent language and falsely attributed to being from the Old Testament of the Bible. They are, in fact, Talmudic and have a very different interpretation under rabbinic tradition than their language appears. One could say that they are the Jewish rendition of Islamic Sharia law.

Pseudo freedom
Alex Jones and his false opposition cronies like Ron Paul, a suspected freemason, are always talking about libertarianism and freedom. Jones, who in the past has sometimes argued from a Christian point of view, albeit a Protestant one, now speaks from a completely libertarian perspective. What many of his followers may not know is that the concepts of liberty and freedom are not as liberated and free as Jones would have you believe.

Libertas, Latin for liberty, originates with the Roman god Liber Pater (father of freedom, wine, and fertility). Of course, the US founding fathers built Washington DC and other cities in honour of Liber (Bacchus to the Greeks), with the proof being the Roman architecture and art of the Capitol buildings and the masonic geometric design of Washington DC, among other US sites of veneration to Roman gods. Libertarianism is thus equivalent to “free” thought, which was the cry of the masonic enlightenment against traditional science, classicism, and the Orthodox/Catholic monarchies. It is Jewish-masonic through and through. However, true freedom comes not through so called free thought or liberation from the consequences of actions but through the redemption of Christ, who frees us from the bondage of sin. Liber Pater is a cheap imitator of Christ. The libertarian movement and the US constitution, complete with their spirit of freemasonry and idolatry, cannot bring anyone true freedom.
They are completely useless against the Judeo-Masonic New World Order conspiracy.

Liber Pater, or Bacchus.

Major problems with the US Constitution as an instrument of freedom
Some may argue that regardless of the US Constitution’s Masonic origins, it protects Americans’ civil liberties and rights. Certainly, it does in theory and in certain historical instances. But how good can the Constitution be having occult Enlightenment origins and being based in a temporal and false form of freedom? And knowing the compromised origins of the United States and its laws, is it possible that the masonic Founding Fathers designed the Constitution to fail the people? Here are just some of the major defects with the Constitution,

One of the two gravest defects lies in how courts are structured with respect to the constitutions they interpret. A basic design pattern for good government is that officials should not be interpreters of their own power. Allowing federal courts to interpret federal powers and state courts to interpret state powers has led to inevitable aggrandizement of the powers of both: to broad interpretations of power-granting clauses. Vague constitutional language, which is practically inevitable, would not lead to tyranny if the judiciaries who have final say interpreting these clauses did not have incentives to expand these powers. This effect is exacerbated by allowing the legislature and executive to choose the judges. I am afraid that, for example, Professor Barnett’s proposal for convincing federal courts to (in many ways return to) libertarian interpretations of our Constitution, desirable as such interpretions are, is nevertheless futile. Incentives operate to select judges who profess broad interpretations of power, and while sitting on the court for judges to further aggrandize governmental power. Our judicial structure is another one-way ratchet towards tyranny.[III]

What about private property?

The other of the two gravest defects is the lack of unbundled political property rights. Federalism and separation of functions are two very good, indeed crucial, features of the Constitution, but they are insufficient for protecting liberty. Unbundled rights to engage in narrow forms of coercive legal procedure are often a far better way to distribute power than hierarchical federalism and separation of powers in an entity that is supposed to be in totality sovereign. The gothi of medieval Iceland, often cited by anarcho-capitalists, were an example of a political property right. Medieval and Renaissance England was a world full of polycentric, or highly distributed, political property rights, but these were swallowed up by legislative powers in colonial America. We must revive this very important and legally mature method of distributing political powers. Many legislative, executive, and judicial functions should be granted to private entities as political property rights, with the jurisdictional boundaries and procedural standards defined in those rights to be enforced by an extraordinary court independent of all other governmental entities.[IV]

Keep in mind that freemasonic membership is a prerequisite to becoming a judge in the United States of America and elsewhere. What’s more, Jewish persons are overrepresented in the judiciary.

It wouldn’t be difficult to imagine the Constitution being designed to fail, since Freemasons have always offered lies as truth, enslavement as freedom. For they are against God, who is Himself all truth and life. Their entire existence is based upon a hijacking of truth, overthrowing god, proclaiming themselves gods, and establishing their false messianic kingdom on Earth.

Is Alex Jones a freemason?
So far, no one has been able to produce a list showing Infowars radio host Alex Emerick Jones’ as a registered freemason or fraternal brother. But based on his dialectic, he is absolutely espousing freemasonic concepts through his insistence upon a return to the Masonic Founding Fathers’ Constitutional Enlightenment government.
He has also espoused other aspects of kabbalistic freemasonry in the forms of the New Age and pantheism[V].
And he is surrounded by Jews and questionable characters like Ron Paul (Freemason?), Charlie Sheen, and long-time Jewish pal Joe Rogan (a Satanist?) and a Freemason? Freemasonry, Judaism, and Hollywood are no strangers to each other by any stretch of the imagination. And we know that Paul is a member of the Masonic-like Lambda Chi Alpha fraternity.[VI] Jones’ kosher conspiracist pal Jesse Ventura is also suspected of being a mason.
Ventura and Jones are always talking about the next American revolution, yet we know Jews and masons have orchestrated and engineered almost every single revolution in the last 300 years, including the American Revolution Jones is always glorifying. Ventura’s popular television show Conspiracy Theory, which is blatant controlled opposition, is produced by the Jewish Michael Braverman and regularly features Alex Jones.

It is only speculation at this point, but Alex Jones may be the descendant of a prominent Texas freemason named Anson Jones, who was Grand Master of the First Masonic Lodge of Texas, 1837 and Master First Lodge of Texas, 1835.[VII] The name, location, and occupation all share a similarity to Alex Emric Jones and his family, which now includes a Jewish revolutionary.

“One of the three sons of Anson Jones, namely Samuel Edward (formerly Houston) Jones, born 1841, was a successful dentist. He was an early president of the Texas Dental Association. According to Wikipedia Alex Jones is the son of a dentist! It seems as if the Jones clan has a monopoly in the cosmetic dental business. His father is David R. Jones-member of the Austin Liberty Coalition…David R Jones’ grandfather was probably Samuel Edward Jones, a dentist”[VIII]

Alex Jones’ father, David, states on a meetup page,

I practice dentistry in south Austin and manage large dental practices. I am married and have children and grandchildren. Our family has farmed and ranched for many years. I believe our culture protected under the constitution is being eroded. Are you willing to sacrifice complacency for Truth, Liberty and Justice? My son is Alex Jones.[IX]

Alex Jones’ father David Ross Jones.

Jones’ father is part of a “liberty” group and advocates the Masonic-like motto of truth, liberty, and justice. This isn’t proof that Jones’ family were/are freemasons, but it suggests so. An interesting side not about David Ross Jones is that he uses fluoride in his dental practice despite the fact that his son is one of the most outspoken critics of the use of fluoride. According to Alex Jones, fluoride is being used by the New World Order to pacify and depopulate us. Jones senior became a member of the Alpha Epsilon Delta fraternity while attending the University of Texas at Austin in the 1970s. The fraternity is an international honour society for outstanding pre-medical and pre-dental students on campus.

It’s bad enough that the supposed leader of the truth movement is promoting the very concepts he claims to be opposing in the New World Order conspiracy. What’s worse is that unknowing Americans are being given a false sense of hope in the fraud that is the Masonic US Constitution and the pseudo-freedom libertarian movement in Jones and in politicians like Ron Paul.

[I] Vicomte Léon de Poncins, The Secret Powers Behind Revolution: Freemasonry and Judaism (Rancho Palos Verdes, CA: CSG and Associates, 1996, reprint of 1929 edition), p. 101.
[II] E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend, Indiana, 2008, Fidelity Press), p. 502-503
[III] Comments on the United States Constitution (ii),
[IV] ibid
[V] Alex “Wolf” Jones: Luciferian Pantheist Doctrine Exposed
[VI] Lambda Chi Alpha
[VII] Gravesite of Anson Jones
[VIII] Portrait of a freemason: Alex Jones biography and genealogy
[IX] Austin Liberty Coalition Meetup


  1. Dont ever call jones a protestant. And stop spitting on luther. You wouldnt have your scripture if it wasn’t for him. If the catholics would have won there would be no scripture.

    1. Jones is very much a WASP, thus a Protestant in league with the Jewish establishment, like most Protestants. I didn’t even mention Luther, but now that you mention it, he played a big role in advancing the interests of the Judeo-Masonic plot. And from whom do you think the Protestants got the Bible?

        1. Certainly not the Talmudic Jews, who accuse the Catholics of falsifying the Bible and forbidding their followers to read Catholic Bibles, especially the prophetic books!

  2. People Can’t Be Blamed If, Under Circumstances, Alex Jones Seems Heroic To Them
    Tim, this is a powerful diatribe u submit here, and I’m sure quite a few will be impressed, some even persuaded. But I sincerely think if Alex Jones falls for the masons it will be because of stupidity, not deliberate treason. For u must consider there are still lots of fools–like Jones, smart as they may otherwise seem–who think there are “good” Jews–he’s literally married to one, after all.
    And I note Jones is quite aware of and reports about the outright satanism and illuminism of such as Katy Perry, Lady Gaga, and others.
    It’s truly sad thing to observe Rand Paul sucking-up so abjectly as he does to Israel, but he does this, I fear, because Israel seems to be only alternative as source of funding to the “leftist” Jews running CFR, Trilateralists, et al.–that’s why I say Jews and oligarchs seem to have won, they now being “only game in town,” as Paul seems to indicate.
    U’re surely right masons were a tremendous attraction in early enlightenment era as they stressed power of human reason. And the European rulers tolerated masonry because the masons offered a NEW mode of financing by means of Central Banking and issuing of fiat-money, these masons subtly infiltrated by Jews and hence, the Jew bankers and their agents–they certainly won big w. the French Revolution, as u rightly note.
    I rather look at things historical much the way Oswald Spengler expounded in “Decline of the West”: history is CYCLIC and determined–there’s no perfectly “free” (God-like) human will. Only God’s will is (perfectly) free and prevails. But humanity suffers supreme sin of HUBRIS as they attempt to pretending to “good-evil” and just such a perfectly “free” will–by which to achieve “good,” u see, “Pelagian heresy.”
    Thus w. the enlightenment, we get a guy, for example, who was quite a genius in his way, Immanuel Kant, who re-worked philosophy in a neo-Platonic way, emphasizing humans ought to strive to being “good,” the way to doing this then by way of following “duty,” this duty always refusing to serve the self–which leads to death, of course, but Kant became all the rage.
    Next was Hegel and the absolute state, and then we got Marx, the Jew, who demanded the worship of the state and dictatorship of the proletariat, etc.
    So I rather see the determinist hist. force primarily at work–God’s will–as humans suffered gross hubris, the Jews and masons then taking advantage and actually being mere symptoms of that basic disease, HUBRIS, esp. that of pretended “good-evil”–as of Kant for foremost example.
    Thus the masons, for most folks, were mere fad and fashion–it’s true masons served as vehicle of Jew infiltration, but again, these were mere symptoms, Jews taking advantage of the people of the age’s gross hubris, esp. in pretending to “good-evil” Pharisaism, leading to socialist statism and now the satanic society featuring Obongo-care death-panels and AGENDA-21 “population-reduction” genocide for the purpose of “the earth,” “environmentalism,” etc.
    Don’t fail to note Alex Jones does much to pt. out this satanism and the slow-kill mass-murder of the people by the various means, fluoride in the water, GMO foods, “chem-trails,” etc. Tim, u gotta forgive people, I think, if they consider Alex Jones, under the horrible Jew-dominated circumstances, is the way to making Jews and oligarchs fighting one-another, at least.
    Whether u like it or not, people seem to think Jews have won, for practical purposes; hence backing such as Jones and Paul is most expedient way–for so many folks–of expressing opposition and rebellion–this then can be further treated by the true Christian soldiers like us, never doubt.

      1. Well, wouldn’t u say Jones is one who thinks there are “good” Jews?–he married one, didn’t he? Aren’t there really lots of people, esp. most or many of those who now call themselves “Christian,” who who imagine thus–that there are “good” Jews? Jones then is much a leader and spokes-person for these dupes, along w. Ron Paul and Jesse Ventura and lots of others.
        The way things are sociologically, u got the satanists, led by the Jews, at one polar end, and then at the opposite end is the real Christians, these the leaders, both these poles vying for the info, sake, and influence of the large “middle,” this composed of most folks–the flock of “lambs,” as noted by Christ.
        This sociologic analysis follows my ref. to Spengler, CYCLIC “Decline of the West,” the great middle-class having risen much since enlightenment times, but now in fatal crisis. People struggle, Tim–do u think u’re a saint?–even if u were, aren’t u still a sinner, regardless? Don’t most people struggle? Seeking the “light” doesn’t refer only to “illuminati”–seeking the light is part of everyone’s pilgrim’s progress, isn’t it?

        1. You are saying that Jones doesn’t know the difference between a Christian and a Zionist Christian. This is highly unlikely. You are also suggesting that Jones is unaware of the many faults with Ron Paul and Jesse Ventura, not to mention that they are both establishment puppets. Sorry, but this is also very unlikely. This isn’t about me thinking I am a saint. Stop diverting from my question.
          I expected a better response from you for the reasons you claim Jones is a dupe and not a willing traitor. You’re reasons are flimsy, especially considering the following video of Jones admitting it’s the Zionists but then saying “it doesn’t do any good to talk about it.” I suppose you’ll make up an excuse for that as well.

          What is your excuse for Alex Jones saying the communist Chinese and Arabs control Hollywood and the media? A big fat lie that even average people know is not true.

          1. Link doesnt work any longer. Here’s hi broadcast from the day after 9/11:

            There are quite a few have resurfaced from that time where he’s pointing the finger at Zio’s. He’s also gone after Muslims, China, Saudi Arabia.

            Strange how these Birchers, of all people, seem to be being directed by the Kremlin

      2. Yes, wow, those are amazing lies about the Saudis owning Hollywood. Saudis are actually close allies w. Jews and Israelis, and I’m sure Saudis have their money invested in w. Jews, but Jews controlling things, un-questionably. I’ve hrd Alex lie before, like when he told Alan Watt Hitler had syphilis, and that Hitler liked to go to the front lines in order to watch villages being bombed and bombarded.
        I suspect if u cornered Alex, he’d insist there are still good Jews, despite the Zionist Jews, et al. Alex has a difficult position, no doubt.

  3. Mr. Fitzpatrick: Your exchange with Apollonian is further proof as to why all Remnant Catholics, the few that there are, to Abjure the Realm and build anew leaving the pluralized and enlightened to frolic in their own masonic playground.

  4. Always interested about Freemasonry topics, I stumbled into this post. Unfortunately, I had to stop reading as Thomas Jefferson was not a Freemason, and thus the argument and research were flawed.

  5. Almost my entire paternal line were Freemasons (except my father where the link broke), as the entire Anglo-American paternal world was full of Masons in Britain and the USA from the 1700’s to early 1900’s … but I completely deplore the practices of Freemasonry. I would hate for anyone to call me a Masonic conspirator because of a relative that lived in the 1800’s or early 1900’s, as my Christian beliefs are 180 degrees opposite to what I know to be the problems in the hierarchy and practices of Freemasonry.
    If your connection between Jones and Freemasonry pivots on;
    1) An 1800’s illustrious relative who was a Mason (you could be correct he is related to Anson as he has stated on his show I believe, that he is from ‘Texas royalty’ etc…)
    2) That the Constitution is Masonic and thus anyone who espouses anything constitutional is also pushing a Masonic agenda…
    … then your thesis is a complete fallacy built on a strawman, due to the fact that the man himself could not be burnt directly.
    I was hoping to read something interesting here, but it was more of the same clutching at straws. Even if Jones had connections to the CIA through family members (as he has said), it is because there are in fact good people who go to work for the CIA, and of course never get promoted (LOL), and of course it is possible to have family members who are sellouts and immoral (have some in my own family), but it does not reflect on another individual.

    1. Incorrect. My argument of Jones likely being a freemason pivots on his staunch advocacy of libertarianism, which is masonic through and through. The Constitution is admittedly a masonic document, penned by freemasons.

      1. So what? Is there any part of the US Constitution which introduces a dogma about Hiram Abiff or checkerboard floors? Or is it similar to lets say, the Australian Constitution. Its a LEGAL DOCUMENT not a Lodge Charter!
        Criticism of actual content as opposed to superficial opinion, might in fact make some headway in an argument, but ‘signed and drafted by masons makes in freemasonry’ is ridiculous, because it is quite obviously a piece of legislation for a government. Did Hiram Abiff sign it? Is there a cable tow issued at birth for citizens?

        1. Checkerboard floors and the legend of Hiram Abiff, seriously? You seem to have a very superficial understanding of freemasonry and its threat to humanity. Naive regarding freemasonry, naive regarding Alex Jones. I noticed that you ignored my comment about Jones and his masonic libertarianism. Guess you have a superficial understanding about that, too. The dime-store patriotism isn’t cutting it, aamichael.

          1. Actually I know more than the average bear about Freemasonry, and YES I understand completely the threat posed by Masonic Hierarchies by Masonic intrigues at the highest level; especially the new breed of elite Masons who seem to have adopted Thelema in their rituals such as 9/11. A Book by William Ramsay called Aleister Crowley: Prophet of Evil is reccomended reading to those who haven’t yet realized that 9/11 was a Masonic-Thelemite mass ritual.
            My problem with the point you are making, is that Liberty in-and-of-itself, can be considered a Masonic Enlightenment philosophy for sure, but that the US Constitution is actually merely another step on the road of Magna Carta where rights were devolved from an absolute monarch. Technically, the US Constitution is not connected to Magna Carta because this charter was GRANTED under the rights of the Monarch, and by deposing the sovereignty of said monarch, the US Constitution re-built the definition of Sovereignty as totally democratic rather than Constitutional-Monarchism.
            I just don’t understand how a charter of rights which does not itself have any direct reference to fraternity, can be thrown away like a burger wrapper and labelled ‘masonic’. It’s simply a baby and bathwater reaction.
            And if there was no Constitution, what would be the legal reference to the rights of inhabitants on the land? Obviously, after Independence, the United States had to have a foundational document with which to reference the M.O. of the newly formed Republic, which was a National Entity. Almost every man and his dog back then was a Mason, but to rebuke them all in the present now because of what Fraternity has obviously become, is way too cynical IMO.

            1. As I wrote, “liberty” is derived from the pagan god liber. Don’t let the Constitution’s language fool you. When the masonic Founding Fathers say liberty, they don’t mean what’s just and true for man. In reality, “liberty” is a defiant declaration of man’s sovereignty. To them, God is either non-existent or subservient to man, as the rabbis state in the Talmud (a rabbi defeat’s God in a debate; God must admit his defeat). At this point, you must decide if you believe in God, and if so, if you believe you are sovereign (able to exist outside or without Him). However, if you deny Him, you might as well become a freemason, as nihilism is the core of this perverted doctrine. Contrary to Jefferson and the arrogant U.S. Constitution, man is not sovereign. Yes, one may be sovereign in one’s day-to-say activities and sovereign regarding one’s will, but no man can exist outside of God and more importantly, eternally without His salvation. Hopefully you can see now that truth is the ultimate end in this current state, not “liberty” or “freedom”. Look what befell the Jews when, rather than seeking truth alone, they foolishly sought liberation from their Roman captors. The same will befall so called patriots if they continue to follow the lies of people like Alex Jones and the American ideal. Libertarianism isn’t exclusive to America. It has been present since the beginning, when Adam and Eve rebelled, officially codified in the Mason’s Constitution of Continental Europe, whose spirit drove the wicked French Revolution, and which was transplanted to the New Atlantis, the United States of America following the defeat of Catholic Europe.

              1. So, I’m not disagreeing with your summation of Liberty when it is wielded against the Sovereignty of God over Man, I agree with you completely.
                BUT, here’s where the interpretation gets subjective to the reader him/herself … the term Natural Law.
                Pantheism, or a personalized Creator?
                I know many of the founders were deists (due to their Masonic and Enlightenment paradigm), but many of the founders in their personal commentaries on the foundation of American Law, clearly state that Natural Law is from God (the God of the Bible). Also, there were many trinitarian Masons at that time, many of whom interpreted Masonic doctrine through an exclusively Christian lens, with the ‘all religions’ phrase being present only because of Christian Denominational wars in Europe that they declared had no place taking place in the Lodge.
                I believe their quarms with directly mentioning God in the document itself, stem from their want to break away from not just a King, but also an Organized Church body (theocracy: Pope, or Monarch claiming to be the Head of a National Church). Christianity is a one-to-one relationship IMO between God and Man, so I don’t expect the foundation of a Political Entity to express an outright spiritual foundation, as long as it is clear that Christian rights are protected … as the Founders made quite clear. IF other religions were to be omitted by this Political entity, then it would also become a Spiritual body as soon as it discriminated, and as Jesus let Pilate know, ‘God’ gave Pilate ‘his authority’, even though he was a worshiper of Pagan State Deity. Pilate then knew Jesus was innocent of offense against Roman temporal powers, and had to find a way that the Jews did their judgement by themselves, as Jews were bound under Jewish Spiritual practice, and not Roman State Religion. There is no problem what so ever in the USA, as long as the US Govt does not adopt a State Religion or discriminate against Christians (which is the same thing) … which of course is now happening 200+ years after founding.
                It’s all in the interpretation of the document, and the eye of the beholder at the end of the day, as explained in this piece:
                When it comes to the definition of Marriage between a man and a man, and a woman and a woman (or perhaps the qty of people involved will now not need to be two?), perhaps the term Natural Law has been violated, and become so anachronistic as to render the Constitution a liquid document to justify a Babylonian ‘Do As Thou Wilt’ society?
                It’s all still in the eye of the beholder, and Alex Jones makes clear his PERSONAL allegiance to the Christian interpretation of God does he not?

                1. Again, don’t let the Constitution’s language fool you. They also refer to God in other masonic texts—should we then believe that masons are really Christians trying to break out? The stripping away of theocracy from the American ideal had nothing to do with one simply seeing a better way. It was a direct attack on the Catholic Church. The freemasons, and their Jewish orchestrators, feared a spread of Catholicism, even though they had dealt it a major blow in France. You, like many other Americans, seem to romanticize the intentions of the U.S. Founding Fathers. But the intentions are quite obvious. There was to be no Catholic rule in America. At this time, Jewish messianism was devolving to new depths, and libertarianism became the avant garde, the continuation of this devolution. The U.S. founding fathers received this knowledge from their spirit guides (demons), as is well documented (see the accounts of Francis Bacon, John Dee, George Washington, etc.) And what about Jefferson and his Hellfire’s Club? Looks like the fathers all took the path of Doctor Faustus.
                  If you call yourself a Christian, then State Religion is the best possible form of government—something the founding fathers voraciously fought. Alex Jones is a word magician and nothing he says can be taken at face value. He perversely blends Christianity with libertarianism, as if the two have any associations, but it’s all pandering to a segment of his audience. There are several Youtube clips of he advocating deism with the likes of David Icke and Jordan Maxwell. This also lines up with suspicion that he is a freemason. The US Constitution, being in the spirit of AntiChrist, was designed to fail God’s creation. As the Protocols of Zion admit,

                  The constitution scales of these days will shortly break down, for we have established them with a certain lack of accurate balance in order that they may oscillate incessantly until they wear through the pivot on which they turn. The goyim are under the impression that they have welded them sufficiently strong and they have all along kept on expecting that the scales would come into equilibrium. But the pivots – the kings on their thrones – are hemmed in by their representatives, who play the fool, distraught with their own uncontrolled and irresponsible power. This power they owe to the terror which has been breathed into the palaces. As they have no means of getting at their people, into their very midst, the kings on their thrones are no longer able to come to terms with them and so strengthen themselves against seekers after power. We have made a gulf between the far-seeing Sovereign Power and the blind force of the people so that both have lost all meaning, for like the blind man and his stick, both are powerless apart. (Protocol 3:1, 19th Century)

                  It is merely wishful thinking that the U.S. Constitution is compatible with Christianity or was spawned from Christian beliefs. You say “it’s all in the eye of the beholder,” which is a Judeo-subjectivist concept. There is absolutely no doubt that the U.S. Constitution is a masonic document. Despite the intentions of Pope Leo III’s condemnation of masonic Americanism, Testem benevolentiae nostrae remains truth.

                2. >>>If you call yourself a Christian, then State Religion is the best possible form of government.
                  Actually, you seem to overlook the fact, that Catholicism as a POLITICAL Entity across Europe, forbade the reading of Bibles in vulgar tongues, and tried to keep the word of God away from the peoples themselves, until it was forced in a reactionary fashion to publish an English Translation (Douay Rheims), as people could see that the PriestCraft was all Catholicism had to offer.
                  The 9 Supreme Court Judges in the US used to be exclusively Protestant, and conservative Christian values reigned in the US. Have you checked it lately? Over the last few decades? 3 Jews and 6 Catholics. The Jews are all Liberal and anti-Christian (even anti-Judaic in regards to the 10 Commandments), and the Catholics on the court are becoming more liberal than a Bacchanalia.
                  Why is it that there are never Protestants appointed by the Reps or Dems when their Puppet sits in the White House, and only Jews and Catholics? Plenty of Catholics in Freemasonry nowadays I can tell you. P2 is just one example of the City of London-Milan-IOR Vatican collusion.
                  State Religion must be instated by JESUS himself after the eschaton, but any who attempt this before hand are anti-Christ. You have it the wrong way around. The Vatican is a den of pedophiles and bearer bond traffickers, proving;
                  1Co 2:5 That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.
                  Priest Craft is reprehensible to Christ, as we were all created Kings and Priests.
                  I need no Priest Craft between me and the Word, and any State that forces it is no better than the Pharasaical tyranny the Jews were under in 33AD, because they then force their interpretations and have power over categorizing ‘heresy’ … a bit like being labelled a ‘terrorist’ by the Political State, with your human rights removed. I know history too well.
                  The Pope is selling carbon Derivatives and Credits for the City of London to empower the United Nations my friend;
                  Carbon is an atomic trinity and #6 on the Periodic Table, containing;
                  -6 Protons
                  -6 Neutrons
                  -6 Electrons
                  …666 … to be attached to individual ID#’s and to assess Carbon Footprints to put The Beast in total control of human life, and Pope Francis is the False Prophet selling this new system.
                  Rev 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
                  Is ‘she’ the Freemasonic System behind America and Britain, or is the Vatican included in this Harlot also? I say to hell with the Vatican AND the Freemasons, (literally to hell) but the Constitution can remain as a check and balance until Shiloh come.

                3. You are evading the issue. The Founding Fathers and the Constitution are on trial here, not the Catholic Church. Regardless of the why, the point is that the United States was founded in reaction to Catholic theocracy in Europe. If you want to entertain your argument here, you have to somehow prove that the Founding Fathers were reacting from a Protestant point of view. But they weren’t, unless you want to admit that Protestant ideals are consistent with masonic ideals. The whole Baconian (Sir Francis Bacon) spirit of the fathers is Protestant, specifically Christian Kabbalist. So, I doubt very much you want to run the risk of inadvertently exposing that, seeing as you are obviously a Protestant sympathizer, if not Protestant yourself. Furthermore, this isn’t only a Catholic issue, as the Jewish-Masonic cryptocracy also targets the Holy Orthodox Church (Russian Revolution as the prime example). It’s more of a conspiracy against Orthodoxy as a whole, which includes the Catholic Church. Therefore, you can’t reduce this complex debate to simply being Catholic vs. Protestant. Back to the issue of the founding fathers, evidently you still cannot understand the spirit behind libertarianism and, consequently, the dubious U.S. Constitution. Reverting to old grudges isn’t bringing you any clarity.

  6. “As the Protocols of Zion admit”
    Are you suggesting that the Protocols are a real document?

Leave a Reply