Russian birth rates fall nine months after start of forced Covid vax
In past years, the decline was 2-3%, since spring - almost 10%. In June and July, the birth rate in Russia fell more sharply than in previous months. Exactly 9 months after the start of mass and severe coercion to covid vaccination, this noticeably and negatively affected the birth rate. Despite all the assurances that new gene vaccines can not affect reproductive performance in any way, the numbers indicate that this issue may be much more serious than anyone would like to imagine. Details are in the material Nakanune.RU.
We have already paid attention to the fact that in June the birth rate in the country fell by 10% compared to June last year. More precisely, by 9.6%. In July, this happened again - a decrease of 8.6% compared to July last year (the birth rate is compared with the same month of the previous year). The fall is not extraordinary - in some months it happened before. If not for two circumstances.
First, in previous months, the decline in the birth rate was smaller:
January -2.6%;
February -1.0%;
March -9.9%;
April -9.9%;
May -2.7%.
Last year, the decline averaged 2.3%. Since March, in four months out of five - almost 10%. The difference is more than noticeable.
The second circumstance is that just 9 months have passed since the start of the coercive campaign. It began in June last year and hit most regions in the summer. The first big dip in fertility occurred in March, exactly 9 months later. Could it be connected with the voluntary-compulsory covid vaccination that had begun?
Apparently, the failure of March and April is a consequence of the reproductive behavior of June and July, when people could simply be afraid to conceive children. That is, there was a psychological reason to a greater extent. If we recall the atmosphere of fear, which the authorities greatly intensified, this explanation does not seem forced.
It can be argued almost certainly that the covid vaccination itself had nothing to do with it - the proportion of people vaccinated with new vaccines was then still very small. So, by the beginning of July, 23 million people, or 20% of all adults, were vaccinated. In Russia, no statistics have been kept and are not being kept (at least, so it is reported) on covid vaccination, except for the total number of vaccinated. That is, the age structure of the vaccinated is unknown. But according to the experience of those countries where such data were published, young people were vaccinated the slowest and among them there was the smallest percentage of vaccinated. It is unlikely that it was otherwise in Russia, which means, most likely, the proportion of vaccinated young people was less than 20%.
Another highly plausible assumption is that the vaccinated rate among those young people who were trying to conceive was even lower. That is, there were very few vaccinated potential parents. Therefore, the covid vaccination itself, most likely, did not affect directly, but indirectly - people were more often afraid to conceive a child in the conditions of severe coercion that had begun.
But the failure of June and July is already the result of conceptions in September and October, when the percentage of those vaccinated was completely different. So, by the beginning of September in Russia there were already 38% of vaccinated adults, and by the end of October - 48%. Therefore, the decline in the birth rate during the summer months is likely to some extent directly related to covid vaccination.
The problem is that this cannot be said for sure, one can only speculate. It is also impossible to verify this statistically, since for each region you need to know the proportion of vaccinated people who tried to conceive a child and compare it with the decline in the birth rate in that region. There is no such data and cannot be (fortunately, privacy still exists).
We tried to compare across all regions the percentage of adults vaccinated by a certain date and the decline in their birth rate after 9 months, but found no statistical relationship. This is not surprising: the percentage of vaccinated adults is far from the percentage of young people who want to become parents. This difference is comparable to the percentage of fertility decline. In addition, there are monthly fluctuations in the birth rate. For example, in 2021, the average monthly birth rate fluctuation was plus or minus 6.2%. Under these conditions, it is not possible to “catch” the impact of covid vaccination on the decline in fertility with the available statistical tools. It's like trying to cut a pattern out of paper with a hacksaw or looking for bacteria with a magnifying glass.
What can be said for sure? Only the very fact that after the start of mass coercion to covid vaccination, the birth rate in Russia fell sharply. There is no way to prove this influence, but the fact remains. And it must be reckoned with. Moreover, there were many voices that no one studied the effect of new gene vaccines on childbearing function. But in response, only "authoritative" statements that these drugs are "absolutely safe."
At the same time, in science, when some kind of experiment is set up, with the slightest change in conditions, a change in the studied parameters is also assumed. Very strong arguments are needed to assert a priori that the new conditions will not affect the output parameter. In the case of covid vaccination, the new condition was the very use of new gene vaccines that had not been used before, as the developers themselves repeated, presenting them as a unique achievement. The studied parameter is the birth rate. And the influence of the first on the second is obviously stupid to deny. After all, new vaccines introduced the coronavirus gene, that is, alien genetic information, into the human body. It penetrated the cells, forcing them to produce the coronavirus protein, in response to which antibodies were already produced. All this was repeatedly told by the director of the Gamaleya Center Alexander Gintsburg.
It goes without saying that an assumption arises: do gene vaccines affect fertility, which is also a kind of mechanism for the transfer of genetic information? This is the first thought that comes to mind when analyzing the possible consequences. But it was tabooed, dubbed a "conspiracy theory" that cannot be discussed. And in vain. Because after a while this influence, apparently, manifested itself. This can be considered a coincidence, but the fact that 9 months after the covid vaccination was forced, the birth rate fell much more than it was before, it is impossible not to notice.
For the last three years, the birth rate in Russia has been almost constant. It will fall this year. Unlike "authoritative scientists" who get away with any statements, we will not argue that the drop in the birth rate by almost 10% in recent months is caused by the covid vaccination. We have no such reason. We affirm only the statistical fact itself, from which we cannot get away. Serious research is needed to understand the effect of these injections on fertility. It may not exist, but it needs to be proven. Until this is proven, there is every reason to consider as a legitimate hypothesis that the birth rate fell precisely because of the covid vaccination.
Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Scientific Director of the Research Institute of Vaccines and Serums. I.I. Mechnikov Vitaly Zverev at the end of last year said that the impact of anti-virus vaccines on human reproductive ability has not been studied.
“I can’t put my hand on my heart and say that there will be no consequences. We know that there are complications in girls and young men, there are very serious complications. The man seems to be young and healthy, but we have a lot of underexamined people. And the girl may have some kind of pathology that can worsen, and young people. I can not guarantee anything, "he said.
In the United States, we recall, studies have shown very alarming results. Of the 127 women who were vaccinated early in their pregnancy, 104 miscarried. But at the same time, an arithmetic twist was used to keep the miscarriage rate low. The authors simply divided the number of miscarriages by all vaccinated pregnant women. This drew the attention of Dr. Hong Sun (Hong Sun) from Antwerp. And the authors did admit they were wrong, but tried to justify themselves. It came out completely unconvincing.
By the way, in the United States at the beginning of 2021, the very concept of a vaccine was changed, "fitting" it to new gene preparations. If the traditional understanding of a vaccine is a weakened or killed pathogen that is introduced to develop immunity, then now a vaccine, according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, is also "a preparation of genetic material (for example, a strand of synthesized messenger RNA) that is used by body cells to obtain antigenic substances" (point b).
Late last year, studies in Australia showed that pregnant rats vaccinated with Pfizer were almost 2.5 times more likely to experience fetal loss than unvaccinated rats. But the most striking thing is that recently the British medical authorities, after all the assurances of the safety of new vaccines, made a confession:
“Currently, it is not possible to provide sufficient confidence in the safe use of the vaccine by pregnant women ... Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated,” the new recommendations note (section Toxicity conclusions).
What happens? For a year and a half people were simply deceived? After all, it was stated that everything was safe, but it turns out that these were empty words. How else to explain this unexpected confession? In Russia, we recall, the Ministry of Health referred in its documents to "WHO recommendations." Awesome argument! Its fruits, perhaps, Russia is beginning to reap. One can only hope that the large drop in the birth rate is caused by other reasons, although there is little hope for such a coincidence.