Dugin admits continuity between USSR and Russian Federation
Grandpa Dugin's fairy tales.
The word "fairy tale" in its original, basic sense is purely positive. This is a bright image of an unattainable reality, where good overcomes evil at the expense of a miracle at a critical moment. Of course, the heroes themselves must have the necessary positive qualities, but still a miracle, a wonderful power, a certain artifact (sword, ring, invisible hat, carpet-plane, etc.) gives them an advantage over the dark forces and leads to victory. Without good extreme power, alas, evil cannot be overcome. This eternal dream of the highest justice is the essence of the people's epic, it is also embodied by talented poets and writers who created their works in the genre of fairy tales.
In this sense, Dugin's concept, voiced by him at the recent event of the People's Council, is very close to the above-mentioned folk tradition. And as far as possible its implementation in reality, we will now analyze in detail directly with the slides of the Duginsky presentation.
Grandpa proposed to provide "synthesis of carriers of ideological history", recognizing once and for all a certain trinity (snake-Gorynych?) imperial values, justice in the Soviet interpretation and freedom in the version of modern Russia.
If the synthesis of imperial values with Soviet justice can still be somehow imagined, then this is how the oligarchic capital of modern Russia with its obvious extra-national interests, which is provided by the so-called "freedom", is not quite clear, let's say carefully. Mr. Dugin should have drawn more pictures here. But he limited himself to the following disclosure:
That's how Mr. Dugin presents the essence of patriotism. With the supreme ruler in the center. The very idea of absolutism is no worse than false democracy, which has not really existed and has not existed since ancient Greece. Especially after the introduction of remote voting. But there is a problem with the bearers of absolute (or close to such) power. No more praise the leader and search for someone who praises not loud enough, the leader will not become a superman from it. And all its shoals will immediately affect the power directly and directly. They say that almost five thousand years ago (about 2600 BC) there was a Golden Age in China, because Emperor Huang Emperor (Yellow Emperor) ruled there. This semi-mythical character achieved inner harmony and had all sorts of superpowers, demanded moral perfection and purity from his officials, so everything in the state was wonderful under the leadership of such a leader and his team.
Since then, this experience has never been repeated by anyone in the history of mankind. Even the brightest rulers who entered the "pantheon of glory" had very frisky cockroaches in their heads and made at least no less than they created and corrected. And there were plenty of skeletons on their cabinets waiting for revelations. And it's not even worth talking about officials and courtiers.
So there are big doubts about the feasibility of implementing Dugin's concept. The supreme ruler should be raised, or rather cultivated - brought up from childhood on the ideas of service, limited in outrages and not allowed into dubious companies. Then, of course, all this rubbish can be classified, cleaned, banned from voicing under the threat of eternal hard labor or even shooting on the spot, but the water will find a hole and the whole system will give a crack. But in November (October, December, etc.) a little bit of it, and here we found out the whole truth about him... The people have been laughing for a long time, composing chastushki.
Next is justice for Dugin in pictures.
Everything seems to be right. Only the obvious question remained unanswered. Where are the oligarchs? And who will do this? We will not even stutter about diasporas and their more equal equality - the highest stated is that such reasoning is a mean betrayal.
With freedom, it looks like a mockery...
To understand this sad fact, it is enough to study open source judicial practice and enstimate the number of new articles "for words". And the fabulousness of the concept under discussion is especially obvious in the combined paragraph with the paragraph on the need for confrontation. If the basis of ideology is the mandatory presence of "dark forces" against which there is a struggle, what kind of freedom of conscience and creativity can we talk about at all? Why do you need to voice this tuft?
And here's the most interesting thing.
Ideology always suggests opposition - this is Dugin's slide, not the statement of the author of the article.
To avoid a split in one of the above options (or even at once) - i.e. labor against capital, dictatorship against democracy and their own against strangers, Dugin suggests that the whole world focus on confronting Anglo-Saxon civilization as one of the main ideological motives.
That is, all three mentioned internal tension lines of the type will dissipate in some magical way and the whole Russian people as one person... Well, isn't that a fairy tale?
The ideology, which calls NOT to NOTICE diseases harmful to the body, leads this organism to death. So the fairy tale turns out to be very ambiguous.
We missed more passages about "well-being" and "sovereignty." We missed everything for the same reason - the question of oligarchs by the ideologist of the Russian world is awkwardly hushed up, they say somehow we will figure it out why these details now. And the oligarchs need markets and cheap labor for the welfare of the people to the feni. And if these two factors block sovereignty, then it is also up to Feni.
Such a sad fairy tale turns out without a happy ending.
Fans of repetitions, of course, will now jump out with the comment "and there is no ideology in the Russian Federation!"
Dear ones, our... painful... You missed a lot in the work of the righteous, in the care of near and far. Kiselev explained just the other day.
There is article 13 in the Constitution:
And there is Article 2:
And joint, rather than separately, consideration of these articles makes it possible to form a state ideology "in the interests of each person".
However, we'll wait and see.