Bishop Richard Williamson Dossier
 Editorial Director: Abbé Paul Schoonbroodt |
||||||
The former Anglican of the FSSPX became a bishop,
|
 |
|
 |
1988 |
1990 |
Monsignor Williamson: A decoy
Bishop Williamson – Part No. 8 - The (ex?) Anglican, the 'Rose' bishop of the Society, has imposed, in the FSSPX milieu, Derek Holland, an activist of the Anglo-Saxon pagan "new right", an admirer of Khadafi and Khomeini
Publication of March 10, 2010
Following a series of new revelations about Bishop Williamson's associations with Anglo-Saxon neo-conservative activist circles, the movement that gravitates around the ambivalent British circles of the Fabian Society , the Round Table (of Cecil Rhodes and Lord Rothschild) and the occult globalist bodies, headed by the high lodges, which have shaped world history since Cecil Rhodes and his entourage, with a view to the progressive march towards Masonic world government.
In this VM , we provide biographical elements of the activist Derek Holland , promoted and protected by the British bishop Bishop Williamson .
Derek Holland lived in 2004 in an apartment near the Vatican, and he was linked by business interests with John Forrest Sharpe [see VM Mgr Williamson – Part No. 7 ], another protégé of the mole No. 1 infiltrated in the early 1970s in the FSSPX .
Bishop Williamson – Part No. 7 - The 'Rose' bishop imposed and protected in the FSSPX magazine in the United States, and against the advice of Father Scott, a naturalist neo-fascist military activist: Mr. J. Forrest Sharpe
Publication of January 24, 2010
The beginning of a series of new revelations about Bishop Williamson's associations with Anglo-Saxon neo-conservative activist circles, the movement that gravitates around the ambivalent British circles of the Fabian Society , the Round Table (of Cecil Rhodes and Lord Rothschild) and the occult globalist bodies, headed by the high lodges, which have shaped world history since Cecil Rhodes and his entourage, with a view to the progressive march towards Masonic world government.
Father Scott wanted to oppose John Sharpe 's entryism in the magazine The Angelus (the equivalent of Fideliter for the FSSPX in the United States) and accused the military man of having "fallen into naturalism and betrayed the Catholic Faith" . But nothing worked, despite the denunciation of Mr Sharpe by Father Scott , Bishop Fellay did not support and let the British bishop, Bishop Williamson-'Cunctator' , the ex(?)-Anglican "with the Rose" of the Fraternity, do what he wanted. On the contrary, Father Scott was dismissed by Bishop Fellay from his post as director of the Holy Cross Seminary in Australia, in the summer of 2008 and was sent to Canada to do a job that takes him away from any responsibility.
The cancelled visit (fortunately at the last minute) of the Winona seminarians to the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.
The recent, visibly concerted reappearance of Bishop Williamson, in a media "role-playing" duo with Father Celier, in an attempt to restore credibility to both, each in his role of dominating a section of the clergy of the FSSPX.
The mother of Bishop Williamson, a follower of the Protestant Gnostic sect " Christian Science " , religion of the Milner Group ( British Round Table , linked to the Rothschild clan), head of the immense Victorian Empire and historical matrix of current Anglo-Saxon globalism
Publication of May 19, 2009
Helen Williamson , who died in 2000, a strong personality, was a fervent disciple of Mary Baker Eddy . Mrs. Edna Andrews, governess of the Williamson family for 20 years, reveals the hidden past of Bishop Richard Williamson. Bishop Williamson chose for his episcopal coat of arms a Rose+Croix symbol very similar to that of the British Round Table . The elements that we publish today come from research in the British press on the ex-Anglican, son of an Anglican pastor, on the occasion of his provocative negationist statements on Swedish television. It is the recent statements of his former governess Mrs. Edna Andrews to the Daily Mail on February 7, 2009 who, having known him very well, dissipate this thick smokescreen to reveal some precious details on the family origins of Bishop Williamson . Bishop Richard Nelson Williamson was born from the union of Mr Williamson , a Scottish Anglican Protestant, head buyer at Marks & Spencers , who died in 1987, and Mrs Helen Williamson , who died at the age of 93 in 2000, a follower of the Protestant sect " Christian Science " , herself born in Paris to wealthy American parents . -(1)-New biographical information on Bishop Williamson , from his governess for 20 years. -(2)- The Gnostic doctrine of " Christian Science " of which his mother was a fervent follower. -(3)- " Christian Science " , the religion of the Milner Group , a historical component of the British Round Table . - (4)- Bishop Williamson 's speech to absolve Ratzinger-Benedict XVI of his heresies: a theory of " Christian Science " applied within the FSSPX ? -(5)- Questions to the three other bishops consecrated by Mgr Lefebvre in 1988. Based on the FACTUAL elements that Virgo-Maria continues to accumulate: on the origins of Mgr Williamson (Anglican pastor father, mother follower of “ Christian Science ” , disciple of the ex(?)- Fabien Malcolm Muggeridge, protector, ordainer and promoter of homosexual predatory-rapist clerics, etc.), would Archbishop Lefebvre have chosen Father Richard Williamson as a candidate for the episcopate? If Archbishop Lefebvre had learned THESE FACTS after the consecrations, would he have kept Archbishop Williamson within the FSSPX ?
Bishop Williamson in London: the return of the bishop with the Rose of the Fraternity to the British mother house, among the Fabians?
Publication of May 18, 2009
Bishop Williamson, wearing a peaked basketball cap and dressed like a jet-set star, shows his silence to a journalist at Buenos Aires airport on February 23, 2009. Lady Michèle Renouf , a leading figure in Holocaust denial, welcomed Bishop Williamsonupon his arrival at the airport in London. Bishop Williamson was invited to London in October 2008 to a cocktail party organized by David Irving , Hitler 's biographer , with whom he maintains a regular correspondence. The current VM file sets out facts about the relations of the former British Anglican, son of an Anglican pastor and a follower of the "Christian Science" sect, Bishop Williamson , and about his incredible impunity, both in civil society and within the FSSPX, which readers will obviously not find - and for good reason - either on Dici or on La Porte Latine . We see that pursued by the Jewish community and the Argentine government, the Bishop of the Rose of the Society of Saint Pius X had to leave the country quickly for London on February 23, after having vainly attempted legal proceedings to block the broadcast of his negationist remarks by Swedish television, and after his "regrets" were officially rejected by the Vatican. The Bishop of the Rose having been indicted on February 27 by the prosecutor of Regensburg, the German Minister of Justice, Mrs. Brigitte Zypries , threatened to request his extradition from Great Britain to Germany, by virtue of the European agreements. This formal notice mysteriously remained without follow-up, Bishop Williamson having announced that he would resort to the British House of Lords. What power higher than the German government could have been capable of stopping in this way the secular arm that was going to strike Bishop Williamson? Asked by his acquaintance, David Irving , former young collaborator of Oswald Mosley (founder of the British National Party close to the Third Reich in the 1930s and with whom Victor Rothschild collaborated to negotiate escapes from Germany), the British historian asked Mrs. Michelle Renouf to ensure the reception of the Bishop of the Rose of the FSSPX at Heathrow Airport, accompanied by his lawyers. At the London airport, three private bodyguards were waiting for Bishop Williamson to place themselves at his service. Mrs. Renouf , a former top model, professes a "Hellenist" and pagan doctrine, imbued with Wagner andNietzsche , and distinguished herself by her unconditional defense of Irving to the point that her ideas were considered excessive by the British National Party . The pagan Mrs. Renouf , who welcomed the ex(?)-Anglican Bishop Williamson, collaborated with Kenneth Humphreys , who spreads far-fetched and radically anti-Christian theses denying the existence of Jesus of Nazareth . Bishop Williamsonsought the support and advice of Irving so that he could provide him with arguments to justify his negationist media provocations, all of their correspondence on this subject being published by The Times on February 24. Irving acknowledges that he closely helps the Bishop of the Rose of the FSSPX. Fr. Gaudron (FSSPX), professor at the Zaitzkofen seminary, declared on German television ZDF that Bishop Williamson had been given an ultimatum by Bishop Fellay within the SSPX, which was due to expire at the end of February. More than two and a half months have passed since then and Bishop Fellay has, of course, backed down, not daring to take any decision to expel him. And, at the same time, the same Bishop Fellay fiercely expelled the courageous Fr. Méramo who was simply wrong – by recalling his fidelity to Archbishop Lefebvre and his fight for the FAITH, the Priesthood and the Catholic Sacraments – to refuse the shameful and suicidal “process” of Bishop Fellay ’s rallying-apostasy of the Society to the apostate Fr. Ratzinger-Benedict XVI . How far will Bishop Fellay continue to compromise the FSSPX by keeping Bishop Williamson , the bishop with the Rose of the Society, whose dissolving action is now widely demonstrated and known?
The destruction of the FSSPX in the United States in 1983 by Fathers Williamson and Schmidberger
Publication of February 28, 2009
The destruction of the FSSPX in the United States in 1983 by Fathers Williamson and Schmidberger, moles No. 1 & 2, late vocations both infiltrated in 1972 within the FSSPX to better sink the work of Archbishop Lefebvre of preservation of the sacramentally valid Catholic sacrificial Priesthood. Second part of the file on the 'nine'. Archbishop Lefebvre manipulated by the ex(?)-British Anglican, future "bishop of the Rose", and by his accomplice Father Schmidberger , then Vicar General of the FSSPX and friend of the apostate Father Ratzinger , then "Cardinal", Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of Wojtyla-JPII . This VM , which constitutes the second part of the file on the defection - for the serious reasons of conscience set out in their "letter" published in the first part - of the "nine" priests ordained by Archbishop Lefebvre , a defection which led to the dismantling in 1983 of the Ridgefield seminary in the United States of the Society, is part of the previous VM which shows to the European traditionalist Catholic readers - most of whom are unaware of these serious events across the Atlantic - the harmfulness of the repeated actions and provocations intended to compromise the Society of Saint Pius X on the part of the British Bishop of the Rose and his protégé Father Ramon Anglès , who will have thus plunged Archbishop Lefebvre 's work of preserving the sacramentally valid Catholic sacrificial priesthood, as well as his apostolate, into the terrible discredit from which it still suffers today among American traditionalist Catholics.
- [1] The 'Nine' against Archbishop Lefebvre – 2008 – Download in PDF
- [2] Letter from the 'Nine' to Archbishop Lefebvre – 1983 – Download in PDF
Bishop Williamson and Father Ramon Angles helped the rallies discredit the FSSPX in the United States
Publication of February 26, 2009
How Bishop Williamson, the Rose Bishop of the SSPX, and his protégé Father Ramon Angles helped the rallied to discredit the SSPX in the United States: already provocations intended to compromise the SSPX? "Anglès GO HOME" posted on the doors of the SSPX chapels in Kansas. Father Angles is currently in Dublin, District Superior of the SSPX for Ireland, and a member of the General Chapter of the SSPX. In the spring of 2006, Bishop Williamson promoted him as his "ideal" candidate for the position of Superior General of the SSPX, before the July 2006 elections. In June 2008, VM revealed that Father Angles banned from the sacraments a parishioner who had come to the aid of Father Babinet(SSPX). This VM aims to make known to traditional French and European Catholics the responsibilities of Bishop Williamson and his assistant Father Ramon Anglès in the current profound discredit of the Society of Saint Pius X in the United States. "But Abbé Angles takes the critique further. It seems that good government finds its realization in the anti-Semitic dictatorship of Nazi Germany. In an aberrant inversion of good and evil, the mass murderer, the devil worshiper, Adolf Hitler is transformed into a type of Christian King. Abbé Angles has an apartment full of Nazi paraphernalia that he shows to favored boys. He shows them the ceremonial daggers carried by officers of the Third Reich. He is proud of his family's vintage Mercedes, once owned by Adolf Hitler . A student from the academy was invited by Abbé Angles two years ago. In his room on campus, Angles offered him pizza and showed him a Nazi propaganda film, Triumph of the Will. He played the film again, stopping at certain points, commenting fervently and reading the stack of transcripts of the speeches. Hitler 's film that he had next to him. Leni Riefenstahl , the film's producer and head of propaganda for the Third Reich, still lives and resides in South America. Abbé Anglès often visits her (he tells his students about it), and boasts of this intimacy." Thomas W. Cage .
Any sensible Catholic must now ask himself the following questions: 1) Who is the British ex(?)-Anglican, son of an Anglican pastor, Richard Nelson Williamson ? 2)Where did he come from? 3) Why did he join the seminary of Ecône in 1972? Why has Bishop Fellay still not expelled from the FSSPX, as the laws of the Church require him to do, the former Anglican, Bishop Williamson - 'Cunctator' to the Rose? Why has he not expelled his henchman, Father Anglès ?
- [1] File Ecclesia Dei Fidelity (in French) – 1992 – Download in PDF
- APPENDIX A - FIDELITY ARTICLE – The Society of Saint Pius X is Sick (The Article That Started the Fuss, Oct 1992) by Thomas W. Case (October 1992)
- APPENDIX B - LETTERS -- Fidelity Magazine -- December, 1992 - These letters were written in response to the Fidelity article published in October 1992 under the title "The Society of St. Pius X Falls Ill." Among these letters are the responses of Fathers Ramon Angles , Principal of the College and Academy of Saint Mary, and Peter Scott , Superior of the United States District for the Society of St. Pius X. Mr. Case and other faithful respond point by point to these letters, providing additional facts.
Bishop Williamson: The “Ben Laden” at the Rose of the FSSPX
Publication of February 22, 2009
Expelled from Argentina, Bishop Williamson disappears without a trace at the request of Bishop Fellay who continues to cover for the ex(?)-Anglican bishop at the Rose of the Fraternity. Having "misinformed" the nature of his activity in Argentina, the Argentine Minister of the Interior orders Bishop Williamson to leave the country within 10 days. Has he already disappeared to his friends in the United States? According to Father Bouchacourt , quoted by Le Figaro (February 20, 2009), the leaders of the FSSPX "opportunely decided that Bishop Richard Williamson should leave the jurisdiction of the territory of the Argentine nation." Which means that Bishop Fellay continues to protect Bishop Williamson , the ex(?)-Anglican bishop at the Rose of the Fraternity whom he persists in not wanting to expel from the FSSPX. Abbé Gaudron , professor at the FSSPX seminary in Zaitzkofen, and protégé of Abbé Schmidberger , infiltrator No. 2, declared on German television ZDF that within 10 days, Bishop Williamson would be expelled from the FSSPX if he did not retract his provocative denialist remarks. Le Figaro announces that LICRA will initiate legal proceedings against the Bishop of the Rose of the FSSPX in the "course of next week". Already on February 10, the Argentinian edition of Newsweek had filed a complaint against Bishop Williamson . The passivity of Bishop Fellay and his obstinacy in keeping – against the laws of the Church – Bishop Williamson , the ex(?)-Anglican with the Rose of the Fraternity, within the FSSPX, coupled with his illuminism on the “conversion of Rome” and its apostate leaders, become criminal, and will soon place the FSSPX against the wall, summoned to choose between the acceptance of Vatican II (in one form or another) and persecution by the civil powers .
- SCOOP - Bishop Williamson's father at La Rose is an Anglican pastor
Publication of February 22, 2009
The Daily Mail 's revelation about the family of Bishop Williamson, who is the son of a heretic , a man whose Anglican 'ordination' is totally invalid. Here is what the Daily Mail published on February 5, 2009: " Richard Williamson was born in 1940, the son of a Hampshire pastor, and joined the Catholic Church in 1971 under the influence of Malcolm Muggeridge, the British journalist who discovered Mother Teresa of Calcutta . " Thus , in 1988, Archbishop Lefebvre consecrated not only a "convert" from Anglicanism, but also a man whose father belonged to the pseudo-Anglican clergy. How could the Archbishop have been so lacking in discernment and so careless in his choice? It is absolutely improbable that with such a family background, Bishop Williamson could have found support in the circles of the Catholic Tradition and been recommended by Adrien Bonnet de Villers , or Paul Chaussée , and many others, when he is the "mole number 1" of the FSSPX. The son of an Anglican pastor, the Cambridge graduate, will have masterfully fooled his world in France. This also shows the incredible lack of culture of these circles who make fun of studying and knowing about subversion and revolution and who, in reality, have never studied the subject of the Anglicans, the Rosicrucians, their ritual pederasty and the Anglo-Saxon secret societies of Oxbridge. They have remained within the knowledge of Crétineau-Joly , at best of Jean Vaquié , but they have not made any progress in their readings and research since the beginning of the 1990s. They are almost 20 years behind in the study. In reality these self-proclaimed opponents of subversion have been for more than 20 years, the toys and unconscious relays of the very subtle Anglo-Saxon subversion, led by Bishop Williamson . When will Bishop Fellay expel from the FSSPX, this former Anglican, Bishop Williamson - 'Cunctator' to the Rose, the former protector, organizer and stubborn promoter in Winona of the predatory homosexual clerics Carlos Urrutigoity and Eric Ensey , and the organizer of the priest "pédéRatz" Marshall Roberts ?
Why does Bishop Fellay insist on protecting Bishop Williamson ?
Publication of February 10, 2009
Why does Bishop Fellay persist - against the laws of the Church - in protecting Bishop Williamson , the protector, organizer, promoter of homosexual rapist-predator clerics, the provocateur who today endangers the FSSPX in the world?While the FSSPX is sinking into a media tsunami, while the ex-Anglican Bishop Williamson "persists and signs" thus designating the entire FSSPX to the secular arms of governments, while he openly disobeys Bishop Fellay by granting an interview to Spiegel , while the FSSPX is now threatened with a ban in Germany, while at the same time Bishop Fellay has nevertheless dismissed Father Abrahamowicz , guilty of lesser but less publicized remarks, the superior of the FSSPX is content with a half-measure by dismissing Bishop Williamson from his post as director of the seminary of La Reja. For years, Bishop Williamson , the British Bishop of the Rose, has been denounced in the Catholic Tradition for having protected, ordained and promoted for 10 years two proven homosexual rapist-predator clerics, Fathers Urrutigoity and Ensey , within his seminary in Winona, for having also ordained the homosexual cleric, Father Roberts . Why then does Bishop Fellay , violating in this all the explicit laws of the Church since Saint Peter Damian repressing clerics who protect homosexual clerics, so stubbornly persist in keeping Bishop Williamson within the FSSPX? Could Bishop Fellay be in cahoots with Bishop Williamson in this orchestrated worldwide discrediting of the FSSPX which destabilizes it and which now designates all its members to the secular arms of European governments?
Vatican Comes to Bishop Williamson's Aid by Spreading False Rumor He's 'Dying of Cancer'
Publication of February 1 , 2009
Bishop Williamson nicknamed " Tricky Dickie " by the Anglo-Saxons. 'Bishop' Negri, supported by the apostate abbot Castrillon Hoyos, spreads the rumor of a pseudo illness and a moribund state of Bishop Williamson who would be dying, and Castrillon Hoyos calls for prayers for him. This fable is immediately propagated with complacency by the media close to the Vatican and the British press, as well as by rallied circles. The objective of this deception is to protect Bishop Williamson by arousing feelings of compassion for his health. Obviously Bishop Williamson is not ill and is doing great as revealed by his webmaster. Bishop Williamson participating in October 2008 in a cocktail party in Windsor organized by the British negationist writer, Irving , prolific author of works on the Third Reich and former acquaintance of Sir Oswald Mosley , member of the Fabian Society and president of the English Fascist Party. The occult links between Rome and Bishop Williamson are beginning to come to light, as are his connections with the periphery of the British Fabian milieu. Not only is the letter of January 28, 2009 in no way a letter of apology and retraction but a new coded provocation in which he symbolically reaffirms his hated remarks by claiming to be the "Hebrew, prophet of Truth". Decoding of this letter. The apostate abbot Castrillon Hoyos , modernist as he is, nevertheless knows the Holy Scriptures very well, and as an informed reader he has perfectly understood the provocative meaning of Bishop Williamson in his use of Jonah . And yet he rejoices in Bishop Williamson 's "apology . " The collusion between the Vatican and the provocative Holocaust-denying bishop is becoming increasingly evident. We solemnly call upon Bishop Fellay to publicly expel Bishop Williamson from the SSPX immediately.
Bishop Williamson (FSSPX) welcomed and ordained a pederast cleric, Father Roberts
Publication of January 23, 2009
A new homosexual cleric scandal has tarnished Bishop Williamson, who increasingly appears to be a provocateur and manipulator who has no place in the SSPX. He welcomed and ordained in Winona another pederast cleric known as such: "A third-year seminarian, Marshall Roberts, was expelled from the Institute of Christ the King for proposing a homosexual relationship in a letter addressed to a first-year seminarian. The vice-rector of the seminary, who had this letter in his possession, confirmed its contents." (...) "Quite simply, superiors turned a blind eye to some cases, but not to others, as was the case with a third-year seminarian who was immediately dismissed with his belongings after it was established that he was harassing one of my first-year colleagues. In fact, a few years later this seminarian, who had arranged to be ordained elsewhere, found his way to the Society of Saint John in America. This immediately raised suspicions about this widely publicized traditionalist enterprise, given that homosexuals recruit among themselves and that predators help their young 'gitons' and their innocent victims one after the other. So I was not particularly surprised when allegations of homosexual rape within the Society finally surfaced." Father Roberts was then recruited in 2006 by "Bishop" Fulham (of very dubious episcopacy), a former Winona resident, who had studied with him. And since early 2006, he has taken over from him at the chapel of St Michael the Archangel . This pseudo-"bishop", "Bishop" Fulham , is vague, but recognizes the authority of Benedict XVI and supports Bishop Fellay 's "process" with Rome. He vigorously opposes the sedevacantists, as does Bishop Williamson . According to the Dimond Brothers , "Bishop" Fulham is an anti-sedevacantist disguised as a sedevacantist. He abuses the good faith of the sedevacantist faithful. The pseudo-"Bishop" Fulham has posted on his site, a conference of December 10, 2008 by Bishop Williamson for the 25th anniversary of St Michaels . So what is Bishop Fellay waiting for to expel the provocative Bishop Williamson ?
Dramatic turn of events! Bishop Williamson now acknowledges FSSPX infiltration
Publication of December 31, 2008
According to Max Barret , the ex-Anglican Bishop Williamson has just written to him to acknowledge the existence of a " camarilla of infiltrators " within the FSSPX. The British bishop also acknowledges that the " withdrawal of the decree of excommunication " is conditioned by Rome on the prior signing of a request for withdrawal signed by the four bishops of the FSSPX, which completely unmasks and discredits the " Rosary Crusade " launched by Bishop Fellay . It now remains for Bishop Williamson to provide us with the list of infiltrators who make up the camarilla. What is it? Will Max Barret ask him for it? It would be the least he could do. Then, since there is infiltration - something that Archbishop Lefebvre would never have tolerated if he had known about it - will Bishop Williamson submit this serious problem to Bishop Fellay by asking him to dismiss the infiltrators from their posts and expel them from the FSSPX? But in reality all this is only a vast deceptive operation by the Bishop of the Rose of the FSSPX. And for good reason: he is the one who runs the " camarilla of infiltrators " behind the scenes with Father Schmidberger , as we have never ceased to show in the presentation of the proven and damning FACTS that concern him directly.
Bishop Williamson and Father Laguérie attempt to conceal the invalidity of the conciliar and rallied 'priests'
Publication of December 2, 2008
The ex-Anglican, Bishop Williamson à la Rose, and Father Laguérie are trying to create a diversion to hide the new radically invalid ecumenical conciliar rite of episcopal "consecration" (June 18, 1968). Concerned by the growing awareness within the FSSPX of the mission entrusted to his work by Archbishop Lefebvre to perpetuate the sacramentally valid Catholic sacrificial Priesthood, the Bishop à la Rose of the FSSPX, Bishop Williamson , is trying to light a counter-fire by diverting attention from the new conciliar rite of episcopal "consecration" (changed and "reinvented" 100% in 1968 by Montini-Paul VI ) to the new conciliar rite of priestly "ordination" (slightly but cleverly modified). Very significantly, the Cambridge graduate, disciple of Muggeridge (ex(?)- Fabien ), infiltrated since 1972 alongside Mgr Lefebvre , intervenes in turn a few weeks after - in a public letter to Father Bouchacourt - Father Laguérie himself tried to dissuade Mgr Fellay from proceeding with a new ordination sub conditione of a cleric defector from the IBP ( Father G. ) who joined the FSSPX after having been ordained to the IBP by a sacramentally invalid pseudo-conciliar "bishop".
The gay predator priest Urrutigoity protected for 10 years by the former Anglican Bishop Williamson (COMPLETE STUDY)
September 7th 2008 Published
EXHAUSTIVE TRANSLATION OF FRENCH STUDY (COMPLETE DOCUMENT) - The gay predator priest Urrutigoity protected by the former Anglican Bishop Williamson-'Cunctator' with the Rose. A gay priest, ordained in the FSSPX, protected by Bishop Williamson and denounced by Mgr Fellay . What does this protection mean? Why did it last so long? (10 years) . Do we have to consider from now on the hypothesis of a gay network having infiltrated the FSSPX? Would Bishop Williamson prefer being gay more than thinking the “sedevacantist” way? With Appendixes.
Interference by Bishop Williamson against Cacqueray to save Abbé Celier, author of the “Cartouche”
Publication of May 29, 2008
After the "Cartouche" by Father Celier ridiculing Bishop Fellay, the buffoonery continues, it is "Alice in Wonderland" by Bishop Williamson, the protector of Father Celier. And Bishop Williamson comes out of the woodwork, accompanied by an anti- Father de Cacqueray campaign and cleverly orchestrated on internet forums.
The gay predator priest Urrutigoity protected by the former Anglican Bishop Williamson-'Cunctator' with the Rose
May 3rd, 2008 Publication
A gay priest, ordained in the SSPX, protected by Bishop Williamson and denounced by Bishop Fellay. What does this protection mean? Why did it last so long? (10 years). Do we have to consider from now on the hypothesis of a gay network having infiltrated the SSPX? Would Bishop Williamson prefer being gay more than thinking the “sedevacantist” way?
TRANSLATION OF FRENCH STUDY (Part 1) 
Bishop Williamson - Part No. 6 - Luther's Rose+Croix coat of arms and Bishop Williamson's episcopal coat of arms
Publication of May 2, 2008
>>>(continued) After having noted the very strong similarity, not to say the identity, between the rose of the episcopal coat of arms of Bishop Williamson and the rose of the very powerful British globalist secret society, the Round Table, we observe today the very strong resemblance between the rose of the Rose+Croix coat of arms of Luther and the rose of the episcopal coat of arms of Bishop Williamson . (to be continued…)
Bishop Williamson - Part No. 5 - The Round Table Rose and the Episcopal Coat of Arms of the Ex-Anglican
Publication of April 7, 2008
>>>(continued) As investigations continue into the ex-Anglican , we are discovering today a very strong resemblance between the rose emblem of the secret society in the shape of an inverted pentagon of the British Round Table of Oxford (' Round Table ') and the rose placed by Bishop Williamson (FSSPX), the ex(?)-Anglican, in the center of his episcopal coat of arms, in the middle of a white Cross. This accumulation of facts relating to the globalist and Anglo-Saxon secret societies around Bishop Williamson , the ex-Cambridge student, is beginning to become more and more worrying. Who is really Richard Williamson , one of the four bishops consecrated by Archbishop Lefebvre in June 1988? What is he playing at within the FSSPX? (to be continued...)
- [1] 'A short history of the Round Table' – Banyan – Download as PDF
Former Anglican Bishop Williamson on private visit to Rome and Naples. Bishop Fellay calls for lifting of excommunication decree
Publication of April 6, 2008
A plan to rally the FSSPX soon? The maneuvers and lies multiply. The ex-Anglican Bishop Williamson spends several days on a secret visit to Rome and Naples. Castrillon Hoyos announces in the Osservatore Romano the possibility of a "practical" agreement without overcoming the doctrinal conflicts and falsely claims that Archbishop Lefebvre has accepted all the constitutions of the Second Vatican Council. Bishop Fellay has just secretly addressed to the apostate Father Ratzinger an official request for the lifting of the decree of excommunications against the 4 bishops of the FSSPX. Castrillon Hoyos recognizes that he "loves" the new rite of Bugnini-Montini-Paul VI and declares that "he celebrates it every day". The rallying scenario is becoming clearer: Levada would like to "revise" the translations of Vatican II. A reader's testimony: Father Cocault-Duverger encourages Arfel-Madiran 's infiltration into the activities of the FSSPX. Father Celier resurfaces and artificially puts himself forward, inventing a dialectic that would position him as a credible opponent to La Croix. Bishop Tissier de Malleraisadvocates stopping 'discussions' with apostate Rome: he becomes the target of the network of infiltrators.
Bishop Williamson - Part No. 4 - The wolf who became a shepherd - Abbé Méramo - Abbé Aulagnier
Publication of March 18, 2008
>>>(continued) His direct action or through his relays to remove the men who thwart his plan. La Fontaine's fable, 'The Wolf Who Became a Shepherd', applied to the British bishop with the symbolism of the Rose+Croix. The direct action of the ex-Anglican through his internet relay ( Traditio.com ), in order to try to have Father Méramo expelled by Bishop Fellay . The action of the Williamson - Schmidberger duo to have Father Aulagnier expelled by Bishop Fellay in 2003, as it emerges from his book: 'The Stake of the Church' (2007). Bishop Williamson removes, through interposed relays, the men who thwart his plan to take control of the FSSPX, a world organization founded to ensure the survival of the Catholic sacrificial priesthood.
(to be continued...)
Bishop Williamson - Part No. 3 - SLIDESHOW - Reading keys - Bishop Williamson
Publication of March 15, 2008
>>>(continued) The slideshow of the manipulations underway by Bishop Williamson 's relays , or by the British bishop himself, in order to overthrow Bishop Fellay , to isolate him or to impose on him the signing of the rallying to the Rome of the 'antichrists'.
(to be continued...)
- [1] SLIDESHOW – Modernist control of the FSSPX by the duo Mgr Williamson / Abbot Schmidberger – Download in PDF
Bishop Williamson - Part No. 2 - The support of certain sedevacantists for Bishop Williamson against Bishop Fellay
Publication of March 10, 2008
>>>(continued) Bishop Williamson : The light on 14 years of the game of a mitred politician against Bishop Fellay . Part No. 2 – The incredible indulgence, or even support (!), of certain sedevacantist circles towards the ex-Anglican disciple of Muggeridge (to be continued…) . The sedevacantist site Traditio.com wants Bishop Williamson to take Bishop Fellay 's place and present the bishop with the Rose as a future Pope (sic). Certain sedevacantist circles and leaders collaborate either in private discreetly, or objectively in public, to support and strengthen the action of " Cunctator ", the bishop with the Rose. This action of Bishop Williamson can be summed up in two axes since 1994: - 1°) weaken Bishop Fellay to push him into the arms of apostate Rome. - 2°) impose himself as the leader of the living forces which would oppose the rallying. These two objectives involve cutting the link between Bishop Fellay and France and placing Tradition in France under German-Anglo-Saxon supervision. The "Anglovacs" are playing into the hands of the internal enemy of the FSSPX.
Bishop Williamson - Part 1 - 14 Years of a Mitred Politician's Game Against Bishop Fellay
Publication of March 3, 2008
Beginning of a series of articles on the real and occult action of the ex-Anglican within the FSSPX to deliver the Catholic Tradition into the hands of the conciliar church of Ratzinger.
Part No. 1 – The inconceivable speech of Bishop Williamson at the Brémien on July 18, 1994 (to be continued…) . A textbook case: the subversive action of Bishop Williamson within the FSSPX, in the objective but secret service of the conciliar church of Ratzinger . Portrait of a double man, ex-Anglican trained at Cambridge. “huuummm.. there you see how I’m going to ruin my career, huh?” It would be nice to say: ah, we are opening houses everywhere, we are building, we are going to other countries, we have vocations, everyone is beautiful, everyone is gentle, everyone is young, everyone is kind, everyone is enthusiastic, we have bishops… huuummm… they are kind… huuummm…” ( Bishop Williamson , around the second minute in the recording). In Part 2, we will deal with concrete examples of the incredible indulgence that certain circles or personalities of sedevacantism show towards the ex-Anglican, either by outright supporting him or by protecting him by their absolutely incredible silence on his actions now made public. Many readers will be astounded by this.
- [1] Excerpt from the recording of Mgr Williamson at Brémien – July 18, 1994 - Download in MP3
- [2] Full recording of Bishop Williamson at Le Brémien – July 18, 1994 - Download in MP3
Abbot Laguérie questions the intellectual honesty of Mgr Tissier de Mallerais
Publication of January 15, 2008
An "explosive" situation . Father Laguérie questions the intellectual honesty of Bishop Tissier de Mallerais: It is an "unprecedented shame for the Society" , "let him leave the Society!" , he says! Should we see the hand of Bishop Williamson behind Father Laguérie 's rise to the forefront ? The superior of the IBP attacks Bishop Tissier for his criticism of Ratzinger during the FSSPX symposium in Paris on November 11, 2007 on the centenary of " Pascendi " of Saint Pius X , a conference that was held under his high patronage. Father Laguérie accuses him of "perverse anachronism" , as if Bishop Tissier had maliciously abused his audience to deceive them with old texts by Ratzinger , which date back "40 years" and are now obsolete. Paradoxically, this priest, one of the former mutineers expelled from the FSSPX in 2004 for insubordination and publicly supported in Paris by the former Anglican who became bishop, Mgr Williamson , is now the fervent supporter of Mgr Fellay and the policy of the infiltrators of rallying the Society to apostate Rome, by demanding that he impose sanctions against the French bishop, Mgr Tissier , in order to silence him or even exclude him. The former priest of Saint-Nicolas-du-Chardonnet also attacks Father Chautard , today first vicar of Father Beauvais in Saint-Nicolas, treating him with condescension, and ridiculing the "youth" of the priest who is also a professor of philosophy at the Saint Pius X Institute. An unprecedented virulent attack by Father Laguérie against Mgr Tissier de Mallerais . What Bishop Tissier de Mallerais demonstrated: Joseph Ratzinger 's relentless pursuit of modernism . Joseph Ratzinger : a very consistent continuity for 40 years. Father Laguérie 's charge against Father Chautard , the specialist in the criticism of Father Lécuyer . The key to Father Laguérie 's attack against Bishop Tissier de Mallerais and Father Chautard .Is the charge of Abbot Laguérie aimed at convincing Bishop Fellay to forbid Bishop Tissier from criticizing Ratzinger ? Should we see the hand of Bishop Williamson ?behind the rise of Abbé Laguérie ?
- Open the message .
- Download the message in PDF
- Conference by Mgr Tissier de Mallerais at the 'Pascendi' colloquium (FSSPX), on November 11, 2007 in Paris, on the super-modernism of Father Ratzinger (Text attacked by Father Laguérie)
Bishop Williamson's admiration for Tolkien, an author appreciated by esoteric circles
Publication of January 5, 2008
Bishop Williamson's admiration for Tolkien, a supra-denominational author appreciated by esotericist circles. A reader tells us that during a conference he attended in Strasbourg in the winter of 2003, someone asked Bishop Williamson what to think of Tolkien 's film . Bishop Williamsonpraised it very warmly, specifying that Tolkien was a Catholic author. To a person who retorted that the film was violent, Bishop Williamson replied that there was good violence, while launching into a comparison between what seemed to him to be good and bad violence, to the great astonishment of a large part of the audience. This declared admiration of Bishop Williamson for Tolkien and his pseudo-traditional and supra-denominational universe appreciated by esotericist circles, reinforces the bundle of elements already revealed by the very strong influence of Malcolm Muggeridge (and his entourage marked by the Fabian movement) on the British bishop consecrated in 1988 by Bishop Lefebvre .
The illusionist and modernist Abbot Castrillon Hoyos at Versailles
Publication of December 9, 2007
The inversion of the doctrine of Christ the King magnified by Castrillon Hoyos during his sermon, before an assembly of admiring rallied supporters. Castrillon Hoyos was the cunning gravedigger of the doctrine of Christ the King in Colombia. He was also the protector of pedophile 'priests' in the United States. And although alerted by Doctor Bond , he remained without reacting to the crimes of the homosexual predator, Father Urrutigoity and his accomplice Father Ensey , former protégés of Bishop Williamson (FSSPX). A disappointing mobilization for the arrival of Ratzinger 's right-hand man assigned to the rallied circles. The sermon of the pseudo Cardinal Hoyos : a modernist sermon disguised in a Christian vocabulary . The false modernist doctrine of the social Royalty of Our Lord Jesus Christ preached by Hoyos . Castrillon Hoyos confused by the writings of Pope Pius XI . Hoyos distorts the doctrine of Christ the King by obscuring the natural right of Our Lord Jesus Christ in order to biasedly magnify acquired right. Hoyos ' modernist method is similar to that of Ratzinger as Bishop Tissier de Mallerais has dissected and denounced it. A Castrillon Hoyos who preaches marshmallow love but not the Catholic sense of sin. Was Bishop Fellay chloroformed by the seducer Castrillon Hoyos ? His sermon can be downloaded in MP3 from the VM site.
- [1] Recording of the sermon of Abbot Castrillon Hoyos in Versailles on December 8, 2007 – Download in MP3
Ratzinger excommunicates Abbot Kovpak (Ukrainian) protected by Bishop Fellay
Publication of December 1, 2007
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith under the authority of Ratzinger confirmed on November 21, 2007, the excommunication of Father Kovpak, due to the illicit ordinations of his priests by Bishop Fellay. "The Great Excommunication" strikes Father Kovpak , for his crime of having had recourse to Bishop Fellay "who is not in communion with the Apostolic See" and that the institutions founded by the Superior of the FSSPX "are not canonical and illegitimate". The condemnation is carried by "his Eminence Lubomir Cardinal Gouzar " by virtue of "canons 1436, §§ 1-2; 1437; 1448, §1 of the Code of Canon Law of the Eastern Churches". While in the West, the propaganda of the infiltrators is in full swing within the FSSPX to praise the Motu Proprio and the "good" Ratzinger, who is up against the "bad" bishops who supposedly "disobey" him by not wanting to apply it, and while these same infiltrators of the FSSPX are announcing the imminent lifting of the decree of excommunications against the FSSPX, in the East and in Rome the situation is quite different. Until when will the clergy and faithful of the FSSPX continue to tolerate this operation of poisoning the faithful in order to rally them, while at the same time, the Eastern conciliar authorities, supported by Rome, are condemning the work of Archbishop Lefebvre , through the Society of Saint Josaphat? How long will Bishop Fellay allow what courageous priests are building in the East to be destroyed in the West by a small clan of infiltrators, in the face of unleashed conciliar authorities? When will these three clerics, Bishop Williamson and Fathers Schmidberger and Celier , be expelled with loss and noise?
Max Barret denounces the “moles” who infiltrate the FSSPX
Publication of November 23, 2007
The existence of a French resistance within the FSSPX, after the actions of the former Anglican, the Bishop of the Rose, Bishop Williamson and the infiltrators were brought to light. Bishop Fellay , the "3rd man" since his election in 1994. The indirect attempt by the "Williamson-Infiltrators" clan to distort Flavigny's battle plan. Max Barret denounces the "moles" of the FSSPX. After the infiltrators clan tried to censor him by invoking the specious argument of article 1314 of the Code of Canon Law, Max Barret reacted and denounced the infiltration: "I am not hostile to the FSSPX!" I am, however, fiercely hostile to the moles who have infiltrated it and want to divert it from the paths set by its founder, HE Mgr Lefebvre , to whose teaching I remain totally faithful! " . On the other hand, the former Anglican, Mgr. Williamson - 'Cunctator' to the Rose, the former protector, organizer and stubborn promoter in Winona of the predatory homosexual clerics Carlos Urrutigoity and Eric Ensey , is now beginning to be well unmasked in France. This resistance is therefore able to modify the balance of power within the FSSPX and refers to the election of the "3rd man" Fellay in 1994. And it is this "3rd man" that the Williamson clan is now trying to destabilize before Flavigny, as Mgr. Williamson had already tried at the end of 2004 in Paris, in the midst of the Mutiny affair in Paris and Bordeaux. It is very clear that in 2004 Bishop Fellay was in the way of the British. Was there an urgent need to have Bishop Fellay sign , before the disappearance of Wojtyla-Jean-Paul II who was threatening? Avrillé's increasingly obvious compromise with the former Anglican Bishop Williamson . Revelations to come on the action of the Williamson clan which is trying to distort Flavigny's battle plan.
Homosexual Urrutigoity: The Involvement of Father Schmidberger
Publication of November 19, 2007
Homosexual Urrutigoity: the involvement of Father Schmidberger, the accomplice of Urrutigoity's protector, the former Anglican, Mgr. Williamson-'Cunctator' à la Rose. A testimony by Father Schoonbroodt . The testimony that Father Schoonbroodt gives here (he wished to keep the name of the priest anonymous) confuses Father Schmidberger who, being Superior of the FSSPX, at the time of the denunciation of the homosexual predator, Father Urrutigoity , was completely involved in protecting him and punishing Father Morello , the Superior of the seminary of La Reja who denounced the pederast cleric, today brought before the federal courts of the United States for his homosexual crimes, at the same time as one of his accomplices Father Eric Ensey , formerly a priest of the FSSPX ordained, protected and also promoted by Bishop Williamson , in Winona where he was Spiritual Director of the seminarians of the Bishop of the Rose of the FSSPX, appointed to this post by this former Anglican. "With seminarians he had compiled a file on the bizarre behavior of Father Urrutigoity . Father Morello probably approved. In order to be sure that Archbishop Lefebvre received this 12-page file, some of the faithful paid for a seminarian's plane ride to deliver the file to the Bishop. This was done. Schmidberger flew a few days later to visit La Reja and sanction the authors of the report. Father X should have been sent to Spain. But since the accused received no sanction, Father X and seminarians left because of this injustice. I believe that this crisis resulted in the seminary being emptied...the seminarian Father Urrutigoity was transferred to Winona." Father Schoonbroodt .
Homosexual Urrutigoity: Doctor Bond questions Bishop Williamson
Publication of November 13, 2007
Dr. Bond, President of St. Justin's College, challenges former Anglican Bishop Williamson-'Cunctator' to the Rose on his protection of the homosexual predator cleric Urrutigoity. Ten years (1987-1997) of stubborn protection of this proven homosexual predator cleric within the SSPX: - 1987, by Father Alphonso de Galarreta in LaReja, under pressure from the Calderon family - 1987-1997, in Winona by former Anglican turned bishop, Bishop Williamson -'Cunctator' to the Rose. We complete our file on the long and stubborn ten-year protection granted to Winona by Bishop. Williamson , the former Anglican, who became the Bishop of the Rose of the Fraternity, to the predatory homosexual seminarian Carlos Urrurigoity , whom he himself would strive to ordain in order to promote him to Professor of Dogmatics at his seminary in Winona. The reader may note the public question that Doctor Bond (accuser of Urrutigoity ) poses in this open letter to the former Anglican who became the Bishop of the Rose of the Fraternity, the ordainer, stubborn protector for ten years, and promoter at the seminary in Winona, of the predatory homosexual cleric Urritigoity and his "disciples", a public question left to this day unanswered to our knowledge, and which we now make entirely our own, and to which we call upon Bishop Williamson to finally provide a credible answer. "How can it be that after having expelled Carlos Urrutigoity for homosexual behavior from one of its seminaries, the SSPX then admitted him to another of its seminaries, then ordained him a priest and even made him a professor?" (open letter of September 2, 2002 from Dr. Jeffrey Bond , President of St. Justin Martyr College)
Testimony: In 1989, Father Schmidberger protected the homosexual predator Urrutigoity
Publication of November 10, 2007
"A former SSPX seminarist in Germany denounces the excuse given by Fr Schmidberger (Head of SSPX) to the homosexual predator Urrutigoity in 1989". A former seminarian denounces the protection of the homosexual predator Urrutigoity by Fr Schmidberger in 1989. This testimony shows that in 1989, Fr Schmidberger , Superior of the SSPX, protected the homosexual predator Urrutigoity against the denunciations of Fr Morello , Superior of the SSPX seminary of La Reja, who wanted to expel the pederast: "I am a witness to these events in La Reja in 1989, because after the problems there, Schmidberger came to Zaitzkofen and spoke to us about this and how the "devil in action" Morello was persecuting the "innocent seminarians". One of them was, as you know, the idiot with a Basque name Urrutigoity . The other was Father Mariano Barte who asked the authorities of the Frankenchurch (conciliar Church) to be freed from celibacy. In both cases, Morello was right. But Morello was forced to leave. I am sorry, but as this is a rather heavy thing for me to digest, (…) I am a father and the idea that these guys protected by Williamson could one day attack the modesty of my children or those of my friends, fills me with anger. » So we find again this double protection of Williamson and Schmidberger towards the homosexual predator Urrutigoity. Until when will this Williamson - Schmidberger duo which neutralizes the fight of the FSSPX be tolerated?
Fax from Bishop Fellay: in Flavigny, he wants to advocate the “Sacred Union” behind Ratzinger
Publication of November 10, 2007
In Flavigny, Bishop Fellay wants to advocate the "Sacred Union" for the motu proprio behind Ratzinger and against the conciliar bishops. In a fax sent on November 3, 2007 ( facsimile at the end of the message ), Bishop Fellay gathers the Superiors of the friendly Communities in Flavigny for December 4, 2007. What does Bishop Fellay announce? He adopts a warlike imagery: "true victory", "the war that is raging within the Church" , "this war" , "a radicalization of the fight" , "that we make a common front" , "struggle" . But what is the stake of this war? But who is the enemy? Who are the allies? The stake? Bishop Fellay tells us that it would be ritual. So, the stakes of this "war" are not the one defined by Archbishop Lefebvre , it is neither doctrinal nor sacramental. The enemy is not Ratzinger , because Archbishop Fellay 's fight is neither doctrinal nor sacramental, it is ritual. So, the enemy in this war is not the one designated by Archbishop Lefebvre on August 29, 1987 to Father Fellay when he denounced in the mission letter that he addressed to the four future bishops: "The chair of Peter and the posts of Rome being occupied by antichrists, the destruction of the Kingdom of Our Lord continues rapidly within the very interior of His mystical Body here below . " The allies in this war which is neither doctrinal nor sacramental, and whose enemy is not Ratzinger but the "wicked conciliar bishops" are the rallied and Jean Madiran , that is to say those who are today marginalized by the conciliar "bishops". For Bishop Fellay , we must form a bloc, we must make numbers, we must do what Suresnes does in Amiens, that is to say Tradi-ecumenism, with those who fought Archbishop Lefebvre at the time and after the consecrations of 1988. Bishop Fellaydeclares: "the recognition by Pope Benedict XVI that the Roman missal promulgated by St. Pius V has never been abrogated" . This is false, the motu proprio does not recognize the missal of Saint Pius V, but that of Roncalli-John XXIII of 1962. On November 10, Bishop Williamson-'Cunctator' has just begun to consider a "compromise with Rome", surrounding it all with false precautions. The predictable end of this behavior of Bishop Fellay is that as soon as the rallying is signed, Rome will begin maneuvers to remove him and put in his place a straw man entirely at its beck and call or to promote Bishop Williamson . The meeting of Flavigny becomes for the communities friends of the FSSPX the occasion to ask together Bishop Fellay for the head ( Williamson - Schmidberger ) of this network of infiltrators who hold and rot the fight of the work of Bishop Lefebvre , and to summon him to clean the Augean stables within the FSSPX, by eradicating modernism and its agents. There is indeed a war, but it is taking place within the FSSPX.
The doctrinal sabotage carried out by Bishop Williamson
Publication of November 3, 2007
The magazine Sodalitium lists and refutes the errors distilled by the former Anglican, Mgr. Williamson-'Cunctator 'à la Rose , in issue 23 of Salt of the Earth of winter 1997/1998, a magazine that the patron of the homosexual Father Urrutigoity keeps under his thumb. Here are the sophisms that Mgr Williamson supports in Salt of the Earth : "a) Denial of the infallibility of the ordinary Magisterium of the Pope with the alleged addition as a pretext of conditions. The same thing goes for the Universal Ordinary Magisterium. b) Denial of the proximate rule of our faith (the Pope), confused with the distant rule (Revelation). c) Affirmation of the fact that a liturgical rite promulgated by the Pope can be "intrinsically harmful". (d) Affirmation that a dogmatic definition can be good in itself but bad per accidens, that is, because of circumstances. (e) Affirmation that the definitions of the Church are due solely to the diminution of charity among the faithful.
Anglicans, Freemasons & Rosicrucians - Ritual of the Rose+Croix of Heredom by Walton Hannah
Publication of November 3, 2007
This VM message, entirely in English, presents a chapter from the book by Walton Hannah, an English Catholic, who in 1954 denounced Masonry and its intimate connection with the (pseudo) Anglican clergy. In chapter XI of his book, he gives the ritual of the Rose+Croix degree. This work by Hannahsheds light on the Muggeridge file . - Ritual of the Rose+Croix of Heredom by Walton Hannah . In the United Kingdom, Walton Hannah had converted to the Catholic faith and then he unmasked the linkages between the Anglican (counterfeit) Church and the Freemasonry. On 1954, he published 'Christian by Degrees – Masonic religion revealed in the Light of Faith'. This book has been made available by the CIRS (Rore Sanctifica) on their website. In this book, he unveiled the Ritual of the Rose Croix of Heredom. This chapter is provided just below.In the Appendix B of Hannah's book, you will find a list of names of “Anglican clergy in higher degrees” (see pages 2007 and following)
Predatory Homosexual Cleric Urrutigoity Protected by Bishop Williamson
Publication of November 1, 2007
Homosexual predatory cleric Urrutigoity protected by former Anglican Bishop Williamson-'Cunctator' at the Rose. A homosexual priest ordained in the FSSPX, protected by Bishop Williamson and denounced by Bishop Fellay . What does this protection mean? Why did it last so long? Should we now consider the hypothesis of a homosexual network infiltrated into the FSSPX? For Bishop Williamson , would it be better to be homosexual than to have the "sedevacantist" opinion? Mrs. Randy Engel tells us more in her book "The Rite of Sodomy", published in 2006 in the United States. In a total of 1318 pages and 4523 notes, the American investigative journalist Randy Engel gives a history of the pederasty networks within the Catholic Church for more than 100 years. In his book, Randy Engel also devotes several pages to the Urrutigoity affair and the role of Bishop Williamson , and to the involvement of Bishop de Galarreta . We have translated them into French, and reproduced them in Appendix 1, with their English originals in Appendix 1bis. These pages describe in very crude and painful to read detail, the horrible reality of the acts perpetrated by Father Urrutigoity . Why, when he knew all the charges against Father Urrutigoity , did Bishop Williamson make the decision to promote the Argentinian to the position of professor at Winona? Why was it the one who was right, Father Morello , who was expelled from the SSPX, and not the guilty party, the homosexual predator Urrutigoity ? Why was it the one who denounced the crime who was expelled, and not the criminal? Why was the criminal promoted by Bishop Williamson ?
Ratzinger's entourage compromised in homosexuality
Publication of October 20, 2007
Tomaso Stenico, head of the office of the Congregation for the Clergy and professor at the Lateran, professes his homosexuality on Italian television by welcoming a prostitute into his Vatican office. Faced with the scandal, Ratzinger has to get rid of him. This congregation for the clergy was still run by Father Castrillon Hoyos until recently. Now that the "father", a militant homosexual, Stenicois relieved of his teaching at the Lateran University, the apostate modernist Father Ratzinger could for his part appoint him to the "Theological Commission" which will "discuss" with that of the FSSPX! The former Anglican, Mgr. Williamson - 'Cunctator' to the Rose, could perhaps also take this "father", militant homosexual, Stenico under his protection as he had formerly protected Father Urrutigoity, then worried for such tendencies within the FSSPX in the USA, and whose case we had reported in our VM message of September 17. And it is with this Rome of the "antichrists" that Bishop Fellay declares that he wants to engage in so-called doctrinal "discussions" and obtain the lifting of the decree of "excommunications"?
Is Bishops Williamson's-'Cunctator-s' Coat-of-Arms a Rosicrucian one?
October 18 th 2007 Publication
The Coat-of-Arms of Bishop Williamson (said also 'Cunctator') is adorned by a rose put on the middle of a "adorned with flowers" cross. Why such a symbolic? How could one ignore its complete similarity with the Rosicrucian Coats-of-Arms? Bishop Williamson has even underscored this very symbolic of a Rose in the middle of a Cross by surrounding this rose with a pentagon pointing toward the bottom.
Castrillon Hoyos, the architect of religious freedom in Colombia
Publication of October 16, 2007
A master negotiator who worked with Pablo Escobar, the "Pope of Coke," rebel guerrillas, and the Colombian authorities before trapping Bishop Fellay in the trap of "discussions" with Rome. These revelations about the man with whom Bishop Fellay has been negotiating since 2000 a "process" aimed at placing the work of Archbishop Lefebvre in the hands of the Rome of the "antichrists" teach us: • That he was the architect of the repudiation of Catholicism as the state religion in Colombia and of the establishment of the religious freedom of Vatican II in the new Colombian Constitution of 1991. • That he proved to be a negotiator of Machiavellianism and formidable efficiency with the drug trafficker Pablo Escobar , the "Pope of Coke," and rebel guerrillas. • That he acted strongly in 2002 in the United States in order to protect the pedophile conciliar priests from the just sanctions that the American "bishops" were planning against them. The marvelous, golden and brilliant promises that Father Castrillon Hoyosdangled before the amazed eyes of Bishop Fellay are nothing other, by an irony of fate, than those that were promised to Escobar , that is to say a sort of open-air prison-palace. Similarly, Bishop Fellay is only asked for his commitment and his attachment to Ratzinger , his position as Superior General would be (they say) preserved for him. But for Escobar , all this ended very badly and quickly. Bishop Fellay should seriously meditate on this precedent, because it is certain that he would not be kept in place for long, as soon as his signature, so awaited, would be acquired. Williamson - 'Cunctator' or another, could indeed soon take it away from him to allow direct control from Rome over the FSSPX and initiate its reining in, as Father Castrillon Hoyos reined in the Society of Saint Peter by leading the internal rebellion of the 16 against Father Bisig at the end of June 1999.
A Rose+Croix episcopal coat of arms for Bishop Williamson-'Cunctator'?
Publication of October 15, 2007
The coat of arms of Bishop Williamson (nicknamed 'Cunctator') features a rose placed in the center of a "floral" cross. Why this symbolism? How can we ignore its complete similarity with the Rose+Croix coats of arms? Bishop Williamson even accentuated this symbolism of the rose (pentagon) in the middle of a cross. Our questions to Bishop Williamson-'Cunctator' . After having been the fervent disciple of Malcolm Muggeridge , himself and his two sons strongly linked to the Fabian, Anglican and High Church circles (closely united with the British illuminist lodges), one of his sons even belonging to the apocalyptic illuminist Darbyist sect of the Plymouth Brethren, today Christiano-Zionists, of which precisely the parents of the famous Satanist mage Aleister Crowley were fanatical followers, we now wonder about the choice of coat of arms made by Bishop Williamson for his episcopal consecration. Why a red rose? Why in the center of a "flowery" cross? Why in a pentagon? Why does this pentagon have a point at the bottom? (known negation of the Most Holy Virgin Mary - Stella Maris in the circles mentioned). And what does his motto 'may he be found faithful' mean? Faithful to whom, to what? To the Rose+Croix? Such a motto is ambiguous, it allows for a double interpretation. WHAT IS AMBIGUOUS IS NOT CATHOLIC . And these very curious things do not stop there. Indeed, on the 10th anniversary of the consecrations, the magazine Fideliter, published in May-June 1998, in its No. 123, the coats of arms of the four bishops. And, to our great astonishment, we note that the coat of arms of Bishop Williamson from 1988 (published in 1998) is not that of 1990. Indeed, the coat of arms of 1988 displays in a much more discreet, more "subliminal" way, the symbolism of the Rose and the Cross. The pentagon is less marked. We also note that the 1990 font is different from the 1988 font. In 1988, it is ordinary, in 1990, it is a Gothic font, which we know is very popular in Anglo-Saxon Rosicrucian circles. And very curiously, the (modified) coat of arms of Bishop Williamson was published very late, more than 2 and a half years after the coronations, only 4 months before the unexpected death of Archbishop Lefebvre .
Muggeridge n°1 - The “Golden Dawn” and the Anglo-Saxon occult-globalist
Publication of October 2, 2007
150 years of anti-Catholic globalist subversion. The prehistory of the Fabian Society and the Anglican-Rose+Croix illuminist lodges. Importance and purposes of this study of the background of Bishop Williamson 's Mentor . The study of the Mentor of the former Anglican Bishop Williamson, the Fabian (repentant?) Malcolm Muggeridge, has led us to uncover a whole network where various influences are intertwined: the Fabian Society and globalist and occultist circles, High Church Anglicanism, the Plymouth Brethren and the Anglo-Saxon Ecclesia Dei circles. We are continuing our study of these circles and in particular their genesis and the historical and ideological circumstances that gave rise to them. Such a study will make more familiar the environment of the mentor of the former Anglican Bishop Williamson , the Fabian (repentant?) Malcolm Muggeridge and reveal what the British bishop consecrated in 1988 by Archbishop Lefebvre (on whose advice?), never wanted to talk about. In this "Genesis Muggeridge No. 1", we examine the facts that depict the European illuminist secret societies in the 19th century. EPIPHANIUS - MASONRY AND SECRET SECTS: THE HIDDEN SIDE OF HISTORY. PUBLICATIONS DE COURRIER DE ROME, 2nd EDITION, 2005. p. 161. CHAPTER XI - EUROPEAN SECRET SOCIETIES
Encyclical “Pascendi dominici gregis” - The FSSPX under the control of a small modernist clan.
Publication of September 29, 2007
The full text of the great encyclical of the Holy Pope of modern times. Condemnation of modernism ('the sewer collecting all heresies') by the Holy Pope Pius X on Sunday, September 8, 1907. 100 years later, the apparatus of the Priestly Society of Saint Pius X in the hands of a small clan of modernists. At a time when the international leader of modernism, the apostate Abbot Ratzinger has taken possession of the assets and titles of the militant Catholic Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ , like a wolf in sheep's clothing (symbol of the Fabian Society to which Bishop Williamson 's Mentor , Malcolm Muggeridge, was closely related through family), it is essential to read and meditate on this condemnation of this same modernism by the Holy Pope Pius X , as early as 1907. This meditation becomes even more necessary to unmask the modernism of the small clan of infiltrators who, in a movement analogous to the infiltration of the Church under Pope Pius XII , took control of the apparatus of the FSSPX and especially of its media.
Insider trading? Bishop Williamson-“Cunctator” reveals the “Fourth Secret” of Fatima
Publication of September 25, 2007
As early as the year 2000, seven years before the Socci-Bertone controversy, stirred up, if not instigated (?), by the apostate Abbot Ratzinger, the former Anglican turned bishop let the cat out of the bag by revealing the text of the future "fourth secret" of Fatima soon to be divulged: "A bad council will be planned and prepared. Which will change the face of the Church. Many souls will lose the Faith, confusion will reign everywhere. The flock will seek in vain its pastors. A schism will tear the tunic of my Son." And above all, this text by Bishop Williamson , purged of all the details of La Salette which would in fact exclude such an interpretation, could be compatible with a reading according to the millenarian perspectives typical of the Plymouth Brethren and other Anglican illuminist sects who announce the Antichrist, and only deceive the faithful by leading them astray in a false eschatology applauded by some. supporters of the current American government who ardently desire to organize the "Armageddon" by promising the righteous to be protected by the theory of the rapture ('Rapture'). Now we see it clearly, through these facts, Bishop Williamson exercises a double game and continues to legitimize the false conciliar hierarchy, devoid today of any Catholic sacrificial and sacramental power.
The Suresnes clan and Abbot Lorans rehabilitate Mgr Williamson
Publication of September 18, 2007
Three years after Bishop Williamson's public support for the "mutineers" of the summer of 2004, the abbots of Suresnes and Abbot Lorans rehabilitated Bishop Williamson and placed him alongside Abbot de Cacqueray. An additional indication of the underground Suresnes-Williamson connection. Reminder of Bishop Williamson 's support for the "mutineers" in 2004 against Abbot de Cacqueray and Bishop Fellay . Bishop Fellay 's personal intervention in early 2005 in Argentina in order to obtain the silence of the former Anglican and the banning of Bishop Williamson from preaching in the District of France. Bishop Williamson 's secret connection with the small clan of modernist infiltrators present in Suresnes. A double meaning: masked irony towards Abbot de Cacqueray , and support for the revolutionary first article of the Motu Proprio . At the same time, Father Lorans is promoting Bishop Williamson in Nouvelles de Chrétienté. Carried away by the small clan of infiltrators, will the final blow soon be taken for Bishop Fellay ?
The dissolving action of the former Anglican Bishop Williamson within the FSSPX in the United States
Publication of September 17, 2007
The dissolving action of the former Anglican Bishop Williamson, the disciple of the "repentant" (?) Fabian Muggeridge, within the FSSPX in the United States. English release of the facts about Bishop Williamson (see the appendix). A cleric who knew Bishop Williamson well testifies . From a reader, we receive the following mail that we deliver to you, it contains the testimony of a cleric who knew Bishop Williamson well , and who reports testimonies from other seminarians. It is about Father Urrutigoity , a former Argentinian priest of the FSSPX, protected by Bishop Williamson , who has now joined the Conciliar Church (Society of Saint John). The moral affairs concerning this defector and his new community are documented on the site: http://www.saintjustinmartyr.org/news/notices.html . It seems increasingly clear to us that the operation to take control of the FSSPX and prepare its rallying to the Rome of the "antichrists" (cf. Archbishop Lefebvre ) is led by the Williamson - Schmidberger duo , the former British Anglican trying to regroup, in order to better neutralize it, the clan of refusal and reaction and the German, a friend of Ratzinger , acting on the apparatus of the FSSPX to force into rallying to Ratzinger the abbots who would agree to let themselves be intimidated. Archbishop Fellay appears in this situation as the one who is not really in control, but who is pushed behind the scenes by his mentor, Father Schmidberger and by the small clan of modernist infiltrators that the German has had put in place, particularly at the head of the media. "In fact, we have been accused more than once of being a ' troublemaker ' wherever he goes - a kind of agent provocateur."
Malcom Muggeridge, repentant Fabian (?) (and former MI6), Mentor of Bishop Williamson
Publication of September 17, 2007
Study of Virgo-Maria fully translated into French . Malcolm Muggeridge (1903-1990), former Cambridge student, British journalist, satirist and provocateur, his Fabian family ties, his two other sons, either in the illuminist sect of the Plymouth Brethren, or in the traditional Catholic milieu rallied, with notably his daughter-in-law Anne Roche (and the review of her work by Ratzinger ) , co-author of a work with the "reverend" Anglican of the High Church, Alec Vidler , specialist in modernism and dean at Cambridge. The strong praise and the debt of gratitude of Bishop Williamson towards Muggeridge , his subtle game in tandem with Father Schmidberger in order to prepare the rallying of the FSSPX. Description of the Fabian Society and the role of the Webb couple , based on the work of the Courrier de Rome (“Masonry and secret societies: The hidden side of History” by Epiphanius, 2005).
Malcom Muggeridge, repentant Fabian (?) (and former MI6), Mentor of Bishop Williamson
Publication of September 11, 2007
Virgo-Maria Study. Malcolm Muggeridge (1903-1990), Cambridge alumnus, British journalist, satirist and provocateur, his Fabian family ties, his two other sons, either in the illuminist sect of the Plymouth Brethren, or in the traditional Catholic milieu rallied, with notably his daughter-in-law Anne Roche (and the review of her work by Ratzinger), co-author of a work with the Anglican "reverend" of the High Church, Alec Vidler, specialist in modernism and dean at Cambridge. The strong praise and debt of gratitude of Bishop Williamson towards Muggeridge , his subtle game in tandem with Father Schmidberger in order to prepare the rallying of the FSSPX. Description of the Fabian Society and the role of the Webb couple , based on the work of the Courrier de Rome (“Masonry and secret societies: The hidden side of History” by Epiphanius, 2005).
Supporters of Bishop Williamson and Father de Tanoüarn want Father Meramo expelled from the FSSPX
Publication of August 23, 2007
The supporters of Bishop Williamson and Father de Tanoüarn, frightened by the force of Father Meramo's arguments on the Motu, are seeking to have him expelled from the Society of Saint Pius X. Father Meramo 's arguments are hitting home in France and in the English-speaking world. An impressive impact in barely 24 hours, despite the summer period. Would eyes finally open? Father Meramo is in line with the best writings of Archbishop Lefebvre , and by saying out loud what a very large majority of clerics think within the FSSPX, he is rendering an immense service to the institution for the safeguarding of the Priesthood founded by Archbishop Lefebvre . The small clan of modernist infiltrators is destabilized by the relevance and objectivity of Father Meramo 's arguments . The lure of Ratzinger 's trap is exposed, and this deceptive character appears as he is in himself, that is to say as a manipulator, a resolute enemy of Tradition and of Archbishop Lefebvre . The head of the Free Catholic Forum tries by artificially dramatizing the incident to push Archbishop Fellay to expel Father Meramo . EA ( Free Catholic Forum ) spreads false information. What is the consequence of this statement by EA if not to suggest a new "mutiny" affair Bis which would lead to obtaining the exclusion of Father Meramo and possibly that of other priests: a sort of "August 2004" in reverse, three years later, a purge in reverse of that of the "mutineers of 2004". The site Traditio.com presents Father Meramo as seeking a confrontation with Archbishop Fellay : should we see the hand of Archbishop Williamson in this ? The interest of Bishop Williamson and his networks is also to have Father Meramo expelled from the Society, because the latter takes away his place as official opponent by finally publicly proclaiming the true arguments and the true Catholic observations, and not the intellectual mush of the "mentevacanism" of the "good Pope Ratzinger with the good heart of a Bavarian" or the future false "fourth secret" of Fatima-Akita that Bishop Williamson does not cease to serve on purpose to the faithful and the clergy of the FSSPX to disarm them intellectually in the face of the apostate Father Ratzinger . The goal of those who distort the position of Father Meramo in "opposition to Bishop Fellay ": to break the FSSPX while gagging the real opposition to the rallying.
Avrillé Sophism (Bishop Williamson?): 2 contradictory militant Churches led by the same hierarchy!
Publication of August 13, 2007
Avrillé's fallacy (suggested by Bishop Williamson ?): Two contradictory militant Churches led by the same hierarchy! Before "the two forms in the same rite" of article 1 of the Motu Proprio , Avrillé had already announced a few months earlier Two contradictory Churches and a single leader Ratzinger : two successive illustrations of the same negation of the fundamental ontological Principle of non-contradiction. Six months before the publication of the Motu Proprio , it is necessary to remember, the Dominicans of Avrillé distilled the fallacy of two contradictory militant Churches for the same hierarchy. This fallacy is aberrant. Its purpose is to prevent criticism of Ratzinger and above all so that the question of the legitimacy of the one who leads the false conciliar Church "antichrist" (cf. Archbishop Lefebvre ) who has taken possession of the property of the Catholic Church and who claims its authority, titles and privileges is not raised anywhere. And since July 7, 2007, we now have, signed by the pen of the apostate Abbot Ratzinger , a twin liturgical sophism: two forms of the Mass united in a "single and same Roman rite": the 'ordinary form' ( Montini - Bugnoni - Dom Botte rite of 1969) and the 'extraordinary form' (Saint Pius V rite). It is always the same sophism of amalgamation. Let us point out that Father van de Pol , a fervent supporter of "ecumenism", explains in his 1967 book the method of Anglican "Comprehensiveness", which allows one to seem to bring together in the same very flexible structure completely incompatible and totally contradictory entities. It is from this same spirit that the sophism that Avrillé comes to serve us with their Two Contradictory Churches, the Religion of Man who makes himself God amalgamated with the Religion of God who made himself Man, directed simultaneously by one and the same legitimate hierarchy.
Father Van de Pol – Anglicanism – The World Church, n°4
Publication of August 13, 2007
A 1967 study by a professor at the Catholic University of Nijmegen. The purpose of "ecumenism". The spirit of the "Comprehensiveness" of the Anglicans. The table of contents of the complete work. We are continuing the publication of the sequel to this almost unknown text by Father Van de Pol SJ and yet absolutely fundamental, which reveals the true objectives and methods of "ecumenism". We have already published three parts of this fundamental book. The Dominicans of Avrillé, closely monitored by Bishop Williamson , the former Anglican (Methodist variant), like the Direction of the FSSPX, infiltrated by the small clan of modernist infiltrators, are completely silent on this decisive book by Father Van de Pol , a book which revealed in 1967 the true project that the apostate Father Ratzinger has been implementing since 1982 and which gives its true face. The application by Bishop Fellay and Ratzinger of "ecumenical" methods to the rallying of the FSSPX to apostate Rome. The Motu Proprio of 7-7-7 is only an expression of the "Comprehensiveness" of the Anglicans currently practiced by Ratzinger in the Conciliar Church, which admits, under surveillance, the rite of Saint Pius V, on condition of recognizing the validity, "the value and the sanctity" of the "ordinary form": the new rite of the 1969 Mass of Montini - Bugnini - Dom Botte . And Bishop Fellay and the small clan of modernist infiltrators practice, in their "dialogue" with Rome the "tension in unity", the famous and nebulous "doctrinal discussions" to come in no way constituting an obstacle to the process, but on the contrary maintaining and strengthening it. This is what is practiced in the “ecumenical” “dialogue”.
Was Bishop Fellay trapped by Ratzinger on Fatima?
Publication of August 13, 2007
Could the "spiritual bouquet" affair be linked to the false "4th secret" of Fatima prepared by Ratzinger? The tandem of Bishop Williamson and Father Schmidberger brings together the agents of this "4th secret" operation. As we progress in our investigation into the operation of the preparation by the apostate Father Ratzinger of the upcoming revelation of an alleged complement (which we call the "4th secret" of Fatima) to the fake already produced on June 26, 2000 by the Vatican, an alleged "vision" presented to the world as constituting the "3rd secret" of Fatima which was to be revealed in 1960, the extent of the maneuver and the compromises of its artisans gradually come to light. Reminder of the Socci- Bertone controversy stirred up by Ratzinger in Italy. Father Schmidberger (in concert with Bishop Williamson ) has Avrillé publish Ratzinger 's false "repentance" . Bishop Fellay is trapped by clumsily linking the sending of the “spiritual bouquet” in his secret letter to Rome with the fulfillment of the message of Fatima. It is therefore very likely that the secret letter links the 3rd request of the “bouquet” and Fatima, and by doing so, Bishop Fellay has finished rushing into the trap of the “spiritual bouquet” which was suggested by Rome and its agents. Let us now decode the trap elaborated by Ratzinger for Bishop Fellay and the FSSPX. If now, taking advantage of the upcoming developments of a tense international geopolitical situation and an economic and financial crisis whose warning signs we perceive in August 2007, the apostate Father Ratzinger decided to proceed with the publication of a new text of Fatima, thus revealing the pseudo-"4th secret" thus prepared, which would prophesy an "apostasy" and a "misinterpreted council", Bishop Fellay would find himself trapped by his own letter, because Ratzinger would present his action as the total realization of the conditions of the "bouquet" and would give himself the posture of the "Restorer" of the Church fully "legitimized" by this new text of Fatima which would have been fabricated once again for the occasion. Two key agents of the subversion of the FSSPX in full light: the former Anglican turned bishop, Bishop Williamson and Father Schmidberger . Bishop Williamson , the typical profile of high subversion. Bishop Fellayhas he ever studied Anglican subversion and British methods of influence? It is obvious, and Bishop Fellay should understand it, that such a perverse operation can only succeed if it is covered by secrecy, in particular secrecy regarding the correspondence between Bishop Fellay and Father Ratzinger . Archbishop Lefebvre had always refused this practice of secrecy in his relations with Rome. The publication of the letter accompanying the "bouquet" would probably have already alerted the clergy and the informed faithful to the trap into which Ratzinger had pushed Bishop Fellay .
Williamson-Schmidberger instrumentalize Fatima in order to present Ratzinger as a “restaurateur”
Publication of August 12, 2007
The Williamson - Schmidberger collusion to instrumentalize Fatima in order to present Ratzinger as a "restorer". A reader of Virgo-Maria.orggives us his very interesting commentary on the collusion of Bishop Williamson and Father Schmidberger to instrumentalize Fatima in order to pass Ratzinger off as a "restorer" of the true Catholic Church. The complicity of the Cambridge bishop (ex-Anglican) and the Bavarian friend of the apostate Father Ratzinger becomes more and more evident every day. We are here in the presence of the heart of the subversion of the FSSPX. In February of this year we had evoked the image of Black Orchestra. In the summer 2005 issue of Sel de la terre , a personal letter from Father Schmidberger to Father Louis-Marie d'Avrillé presents a "confidence" from Ratzinger who was allegedly "forced" by John Paul II to interpret the text published by the Vatican on June 26, 2000 as being the true third secret of Fatima: ""To a few close friends, Cardinal Ratzinger confided his difficulties in accepting the papal interpretation of the message of Fatima. Father Schmidberger testifies: 'Concerning the third secret of Fatima, I can tell you the following... on the occasion of a summer university held every year in Aigen, Austria, Bishop Krenn ... publicly affirmed... I was myself present at this session and I heard with my own ears Bishop Krenn 's affirmations ...' "". The manipulation carried out by Father Schmidberger (with the complicit agreement of Bishop Williamson who patronizes Avrillé and the Salt of the Earth ) is exposed. This manipulation also appears in Under the Banner : " A source in Austria, who does not want to be revealed, assures that Cardinal Ratzinger would have recently confessed to a friendly Austrian bishop, 'I have two problems on my conscience: Archbishop Lefebvre and Fatima. For the latter my hand was forced; for the former I failed'"." • Could the "Austrian bishop" in the SLB extract be Bishop Krenn , mentioned in The Salt of the Earth ? • What was Abbot Schmidberger doing at a conciliar summer university in the presence of a conciliar bishop? • This alleged "confidence" from the apostate Abbot Ratzingerseems, quite clearly, to have been deliberately disseminated by Abbot Schmidberger in Traditional circles to give the image of a "repentant" Ratzinger , and thus prepare the rallying operations of which he is one of the conductors.
Father Van de Pol – Anglicanism – “Ecumenical” assessment – Masonic method of the “Union of opposites” , n°3
Publication of August 11, 2007
P.Van de Pol n°3 – Anglicanism – “Ecumenical” assessment – The Masonic method of the “Union of opposites”. A 1967 study by a professor at the Catholic University of Nijmegen. Lambeth Appeal. Speech by Doctor Ramsay in 1966 and response by Montini-Paul VI . Address by Cardinal Bea . We are continuing the publication of the sequel to this almost unknown text by Father Van de Pol, which reveals the true objectives and methods of “ecumenism”. We have already published two parts of this fundamental book. The Dominicans of Avrillé, closely monitored by Bishop Williamson , the former Anglican (Methodist variant), like the Direction of the FSSPX, infiltrated by the small clan of modernist infiltrators, are completely silent on this decisive book by Father Van de Pol , a book which reveals the true project that the apostate Father Ratzinger has been implementing since 1982 and which gives its true face. Father Van de Pol announces the union of "all the Churches" and shows the central place of the Anglican Communion in the "ecumenical" process. The Anglican Communion provides in fact the historical model to which the conciliar Church must tend. The present Motu Proprio which, in its article 1, affirms the "unicity and identity" of the two rites of Saint Pius V and the Novus Ordo of 1969 of Montini - Bugnini - Dom Botte , proceeds from these same Anglican principles of "reunion". This method of “uniting opposites or contradictories” (“The marriage of Belial and Christ”) constitutes one of the fundamental and universal principles of occultists. It leads to the final amalgamation of the murderer with his victim, allowing him at the end of the process to completely appropriate the remains and the very being of his victim, while retrospectively denying that there ever was the slightest prior existence of a crime or a contradiction. These same Anglican principles of "reunion" were advocated by Dom Beauduin in his famous report "The Anglican Church United and Not Absorbed" to the Archbishop of Malines (suspected of Americanism), the future Cardinal Mercier , for the fourth "Conversation of Malines" of May 20, 1925. THE QUESTIONING OF THE INVALIDITY OF ANGLICAN ORDINATIONS FOR 'DOUBTFUL ORDINATIONS' WHICH WILL ALLOW ECUMENICAL UNION. THE APPLICATION BY MGR FELLAY AND BY RATZINGER OF "ECUMENICAL" METHODS TO THE RALLYING OF THE FSSPX TO APOSTATE ROME.
3rd Secret of Fatima – Bertone/Socci – Is Ratzinger preparing a “coup” to seduce Tradition?
Publication of August 4, 2007
The affair of the 3rd secret of Fatima: Bertone is struggling in the controversy. Is Ratzinger preparing a "coup" to seduce Tradition? In Italy, the fight is raging between Father Bertone and Antonio Socci , a well-known and respected journalist who accuses the Vatican of having concealed an essential part of the 3rd secret of Fatima in 2000. Father Louis-Marie d'Avrillé and the magazine Le Sel de la terrediscredited on this crucial subject. The double game of Bishop Williamson . Is Ratzinger preparing a spectacular turnaround to seduce Catholic Tradition? Ratzinger 's Secretary of State, powerless to refute Socci 's book , loses his cool. A double game by Bishop Williamsonon Fatima. The duplicity of Ratzinger who writes to comfort the two protagonists Bertone and Socci . A new backhand maneuver by the apostate Father Ratzinger in preparation? A hypothesis: the instrumentalization of a false 4th secret of Fatima to obtain the rallying of the FSSPX more easily? The arguments of Laurent Morlier demonstrate that the third secret of Fatima published by the Vatican on June 26, 2000 is a fake. First document. Translation of the text of the Remnant . Bertone against Socci . Christopher A. Ferrara . Journalist at REMNANT , New Jersey. Second document. "The Final Battle of the Demon".
Warning: The complete work " The Final Battle of the Demon" contains very interesting passages that we have cited, but it takes up the false thesis of a "4th Secret" that is to say of an additional hidden text, which allows us to say that the vision published on June 26, 2000 is nevertheless authentic. This is the thesis of Antonio Socci and this thesis is a lie.
Abbot Mura (FSSPX) expresses doubts about the validity of Ratzinger's episcopal consecration
Publication of August 2, 2007
A new press release from the CIRS dated July 31, 2007. The CIRS is responding to information published on a forum, where a contributor published excerpts from a work by Father Mura published in the magazine Le Sel de la terre by the Dominicans of Avrillé (No. 5 in 1992 and No. 40 in 2002).Father Mura was a professor at the FSSPX seminary in Germany (Zaitzkofen). And at the same time, the website of Le Sel de la terre continues to maintain its arguments, which are often erroneous and opposed, among other things, to canon 235 of Eastern Canon Law promulgated by Pope Pius XII . The scandalous day of August 4, 2007 of the Dominicans of Avrillé to magnify the Priesthood of which they themselves have stubbornly, since their article in No. 54 of Sel de la Terre , declared, publicly and worldwide, solidarity with the worst enemies of sacramental validity. We note the double game of the Dominicans who change their minds in a perfectly opportunistic way, and who, in the domain of truth, and moreover in a domain as serious as that of episcopal consecrations, sometimes spread the doubts of Father Mura (FSSPX) and sometimes make their own the erroneous arguments of the reformers of 1968. What respect do these Dominicans have for the truth? Why do they behave like politicians of theology? Why do they yield to the pressures of Bishop Williamson or Menzingen? What confidence can we now have in them to deal seriously, that is to say as true Catholic theologians, with serious theological subjects which involve the salvation of the Catholic faithful?
- [1] CIRS press release of July 31, 2007 – Salt of the Earth – Father Mura expresses doubts about the episcopal consecration of Ratzinger - Download in PDF
After Italy, Bishop Fellay promotes the Motu of the apostate Abbot Ratzinger in the United States in The Remnant
Publication of July 19, 2007
French translation of Bishop Fellay's interview in The Remnant on July 12, 2007. Bishop Fellay approves and applauds the Motu Proprio and its Article 1, but diverts attention by feigning firmness on the 'subsistit in' on the occasion of a recent Vatican document. Bishop Fellay tries a diversion to avoid having to speak about Article 1 of the Motu Proprio which he endorsed with cries of joy and to the sound of the Te Deum , while now priests of the SSPX are asking him to retract this Article 1 which reduces the Mass of St. Pius V to the sacrilegious Mass of 1969 by Bugnini - Dom Botte . Bishop Fellaypersists in expressing his satisfaction with the Motu Proprio whose poisonous principles make the new Mass acceptable. A strategy of avoiding France shared by Bishop Fellay and Bishop Williamson . Rejecting the text of the 'subsistit in' to better accept the bad article 1 of the Motu Proprio ? The supposed 'satisfaction' of the other bishops: a gratuitous and unproven assertion by Bishop Fellay .
Unmasked, Bishop Williamson disappears in the open countryside
Publication of July 19, 2007
Bishop Williamson has just had his blog "Motu Proprio" closed in a hurry. After his calls to pray that "the "Bavarian heart" guides Ratzinger 's conciliar head in a Catholic direction" (the remark is laughable), Bishop Williamson has just had his blog closed. This is probably the effect of our latest VMs on the subject, in particular that of July 11 "Bishop Williamson exults for the Motu Proprio of 1984" .
Avrillé states: "We can think that many new masses are invalid"
Publication of July 18, 2007
Avrillé declares: "we can think that many new masses are invalid" Le Sel de la terre magazine , summer 2007. This declaration by the Avrillé Dominicans is opposed to article 1 of the Motu Proprio which proclaims "a single and same rite" with two forms expressing the 'same lex orandi ' and the 'same lex credendi '. The Motu Proprio requires that those who claim to follow it recognize "the value and sanctity" of the new rite of 1969. Avrillé has just radically called into question, in the name of Saint Thomas Aquinas , the validity of the new rite of the Mass, which totally ruins article 1 of the Motu Proprio on the identity and uniqueness of the lex orandi and credendi of the new rite of Bugnini - Dom Botte and the rite of Saint Pius V. Avrillé does not conclude, but puts in the balance, in favor of invalidity, all the weight of Saint Thomas Aquinas .
Father Celier's (FSSPX) reference to Satanist and drug addict rocker Jim Morrison
Publication of July 17, 2007
Clovis Editions has been publishing "Le dieu mortel" by Grégoire Celier for 13 years, in which the abbot of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X publishes as an epigraph a quote from the song "La fête du lézard" by the Satanist and drug addict rocker Jim Morrison. 1) Damning facts for Abbot Celier that plunge Catholics into consternation. 2) Bishop Fellay warns against the dangers of rock. 3) Abbot Celier 's systematic method of double-dealing and "winks". 4) Bishop Williamson 's hidden support for Abbot Celier in the face of the Dominicans of Avrillé who attacked his book 'le dieu mortel' . 5) The song 'La fête du lézard' by Jim Morrison . 6) What did Abbot Celier mean ? 'Pass to the other side'? Which side? 7) Suresnes’s hardline protection of Father Celier . 8) Father Celier ’s opposition on 10 points to the ideas and work of Archbishop Lefebvre . 9) Consequences for Archbishop Fellay and the FSSPX.
Bishop Williamson wants to pray for the "Bavarian heart" (sic) of Father Ratzinger!
Publication of July 16, 2007
Would the former Anglican who became a bishop of the FSSPX take the Catholic faithful for fools? For him, it is a question of systematic method. After humming the nursery rhyme of mentevacantism (according to which Ratzinger would not be in his right mind), he would like us to pray with him "more than ever" so that his "his Bavarian heart continues to push his conciliar head in the Catholic direction" ! (sic) Short biography of Bishop Williamson .
Bishop Williamson exults over the 1984 Motu Proprio
Publication of July 11, 2007
"It shows the liberation of Tradition from the very head of the Church" Bishop Williamson, November 1, 1984. The accomplice of FatherSchmidberger - The False leader of the resistance to Ratzinger and the NWO . (1969). He declared in 1984: in the face of the Motu Proprio Quattuor abhinc annos of Wojtyla-John Paul II , that "There are signs that show that this decree represents the stopping of the rising tide, the breaking of the long blockage of the anti-Tridentine lock... It shows the liberation of Tradition from the very head of the Church." and again that "Love grows and hopes for everything, and it grows and hopes that the Holy Father finally governs, as we have waited so long for him to govern...". This former Anglican (Methodist variant) entered the seminary of Ecône in 1972, the same year as Father Schmidberger . The Germans and the British are working together to prevent the matter of the invalidity of the conciliar consecrations from coming to the public.
Testimony - Avrillé blocked in front of Father Celier. By Mgr Williamson?
Publication of June 6, 2007
The hidden reasons for a half-fight that never succeeds against the theses of Abbé Celier. The French reaction blocked by a former Anglican? An interlocutor of Avrillé testifies: " Father Innocent-Marie declares that "we did not wish to make a personal quarrel which could have been seen as pressure on the authorities of the Society of Saint Pius X". Would it not rather be the editorial committee of the Salt of the Earth, led by Bishop Williamson (as well as Father de Cacqueray of Suresnes), who would have put pressure on Avrillé so that Celier 's name would never be revealed in the Salt of the Earth (nor indeed in any publication of the FSSPX...)? Under the cover of clerical solidarity, Avrillé never denounced Father Célier , despite the enormities of the latter. As a result, Father Célieralways occupies the front of the stage, continuing to pour out his scandalous theses (pipaule mass, ...). Thank you to whom? Thank you Avrillé..." A witness.
The discrediting of Abbé Celier's article on the new rite of consecration
Publication of June 6, 2007
A strange similarity of sophisms between Bishop Williamson and Father Celier which reveals many links. A letter from Bishop Williamson dated February 25, 2006. A CIRS press release debunked Father Celier 's article published by Fideliter . The childishness of a cleric about leaving his post? Remarks that oscillate between the Café du commerce and adolescence. A small article from Father Célier (FSSPX) consisting of half a summary of the false argument of the conciliar Benedictine Ansgar Santogrossi , put forward by Father Barthe , and already publicly entirely refuted for several months by the CIRS and Father Cekada . A recourse by analogy to a false comparison with the rite of the mass, similar to the sophistic remarks of Bishop Williamson . Very curiously, in a letter to one of our readers, dated February 25, 2006, Bishop Williamson himself already develops the argument that Father Célier takes up here .
Bishop Williamson, the former protector of Abbot Celier against Avrillé, abandons his protégé for tactical reasons
Publication of June 3, 2007
After Bishop Tissier de Mallerais, a second bishop rejects Father Celier and his book ' Benedict XVI and the Traditionalists' . Bishop Williamson calls Father Celier a ' complete modernist ' and invites his Superiors to take action. The false opponent of the rally, Bishop Williamson , sacrifices the "fuse" Celier , now carbonized by the lamentable failure of his campaign to promote his book promoting the rally to Father Ratzinger , to try to regain control and maintain his role as future 'broom wagon' of the resistance to the rally once the Motu Proprio is published, and to continue to lock down the question of the invalidity of the new rite of episcopal consecrations of Montini-Paul VI . Publication of the facsimile of the letter in which Bishop Williamsonprotected Father Celier against Avrillé in 1995.
The Dominicans of Avrillé cornered in the midst of doctrinal turmoil
Publication of April 25, 2007
Special invalidity of conciliar episcopal consecrations. What are they going to do now? The pseudo-"demonstration" invented by the Bugnini trio : - Dom Botte - Lécuyer of the alleged validity of the pseudo-episcopal sacramental form promulgated by Montini-Paul VIon June 18, 1968, popularized by Father Pierre-Marie de Kergorlay , now destroyed. The ruin of the sophistic and fallacious recourse to "eastern sacramental rites". The CIRS study that we have just published, which totally refutes the article by Father Calderon , published in issue 58 of Sel de la terre (autumn 2006), exposes the impressive retrospective of the successive retreats of the Dominicans of Avrillé.
MONSEÑOR WILLIAMSON INTERVENES TO DETERMINATE THE INFORMATION
Publication of April 5, 2007
An Argentinian site has translated into Spanish our analysis on the pressures of Bishop Williamson to erase our questioning of a hidden consultation of the former Anglican (Methodist variant) with Father Schmidberger. Our analysis is circulating in different countries and we are receiving testimonies which show that influential faithful are now becoming more lucid about the relays of apostate Rome within the FSSPX.
The Black Orchestra of the FSSPX is currently meeting in Schönenberg
Publication of February 23, 2007
Bishop Williamson and Father Schmidberger tune their violins in Germany, under the cover of conferences on secular classical music. Bishop Williamson 's collusion with the German network. The Schönenberg meeting. Before the cover of "classical music", it was formerly the cover of "the study of Latin". The action of the network of modernist infiltrators of the FSSPX and their leader, Father Schmidberger . The secret connivance between Bishop Williamson , false opponent of Ratzinger , and Father Schmidberger , partisan of the rallying.
Bishop Williamson, another (substitute) infiltrator?
Publication of January 31, 2007
Paris - The future successor of Bishop Fellay vying for the head of a false structure that would refuse the rally? In Rivarol, on January 12, 2007, interviewed by Jérôme Bourbon , the former Anglican (Methodist variant) thunderously poses as a pseudo-opponent and invokes fallacious reasons that objectively support Ratzinger 's Motu Proprio , step No. 1 of the "reform of the reform". Does he want to play the driver of the broom wagon of Tradition? Doctrinal analysis of the errors propagated by Bishop Williamson .
The very strange Bishop Williamson and the permanent omission of Avrillé
Publication of December 18, 2006
Father Schmidberger's new operation: Lutheran entryism into the FSSPX. A discreet coordination of Bishop Williamson , a former Anglican, and Father Schmidberger ? Two twin cards in the royal art of Father Ratzinger ? The leader of the traditional Anglicans, John Hepworth , and Bishop Williamson , a former Anglican. The Rosicrucians, Anglicanism and the Conciliar Church: the omission of the studies of the Avrillé Dominicans. Avrillé on a mission to preserve the work of Dom Botte and Father Lécuyer , a personal enemy of Archbishop Lefebvre . Bishop Williamson , the official opponent of Bishop Fellay , and who controls any reaction. Father Schmidberger 's discreet strategy to infiltrate the FSSPX with a core of Lutherans. in parallel with Ratzinger 's project of attaching the Lutherans of Northern Europe to the conciliar church, as twin sister to the future "Catholic Church of the Anglican rite". Some decisive actions of Bishop Williamson which reveal his intentions. A discreet but strong coordination between Bishop Williamson and Father Schmidberger , Bishop Fellay being the consenting pawn?
Source: http://www.virgo-maria.org/D-Mgr-Williamson-leurre/index_mgr_williamson_leurre.htm