| Fitzpatrick Informer

The false prophecies of Fatima and the missed events of cataclysmic doom

Timothy Fitzpatrick — Tue, 30 Jun 2026 17:21:11 +0000

A depiction of Our Lady as first described by the children of Fatima (ChatGPT)

(Disclaimer: the author of this article is a sedevacantist—a position which I firmly reject. However, the article focuses mainly on the Fatima apparition and its arguments are well supported. Generally, it seems free of bias and is an important and timely topic; therefore, I have obtained permission from the author to repost it here. —Timothy Fitzpatrick)

By Steven Speray
May 13, 2026 Anno Domini

We are not bound to believe in private revelations. When the Church presents liturgies or churches in honor of a private revelation such as an apparition, it doesn’t imply the revelation is true and must be believed. Our faith doesn’t depend on them at all.

A liturgy or church in honor of an apparition may appear that the Church believes in it, but this is a matter of perspective. It would appear the Church, at one time, believed popes could be deposed. It would appear that it believed the Roman line during the Great Western Schism was the true line. These opinions are just opinions.

What is not an opinion is the Church saying a private revelation is worthy of belief. When the Church says a private revelation is worthy of belief, it means it’s free from doctrinal or moral error, and this declaration must be accepted and believed. However, the Church is not saying the revelation is free from historical inaccuracies, silly ideas, fraud, or demonic activity. It may have all of the above.

The Mystical City of God by Mary of Agreda was approved by the Church. However, there are errors in the work. The Catholic Encyclopedia states:

In particular instances, these visionaries have been mistaken: thus Marie de Agreda teaches, like her contemporaries, the existence of crystal heavens, and declares that one must believe everything she says, although such an obligation exists only in the case of the Holy Scripture. In 1771 Clement XIV forbade the continuation of her process of beatification “on account of the book”. [1]

Yet, in 1900, Pope Leo XIII granted an Apostolic Blessing to a Canadian lay woman who informed the pope of printing a book of all the instructions found at the end of each chapter in The Mystical City of God. Pope Leo XIII then ordered the book to be printed on the presses of the Sacred Congregation of the Propaganda in Rome. The book is titled Sublime doctrine de la Mère de Dieu sur les vertus chrétiennes (extrait de la ‘Cité mystique de Dieu’ par le Vén. Marie d’Agreda- Rome, Impr.de la Sacrée Congrégation de la Propagande, 1900. vii + 403pp.+ frontispiece.)

When I wrote about the problems with the apparition of Our Lady of Guadalupe [2], I discovered problems with the Fatima apparitions.

Much of what we’re told by Lucia of Fatima comes from her memoirs twenty years after the apparitions.

Bishop José Alves Correia da Silva approved the 1917 Fatima apparitions including the later apparitions in Spain as part of the Fatima message. For instance, Lucia claims that Our Lady appeared on December 10, 1925 at Pontevedra, to manifest Her Heart pierced with thorns, and to request the practice of the communion of reparation on the five First Saturdays of the month. The same bishop sanctioned the First Saturdays devotion on September 13, 1939.

According to Lucia, Our Lady came back one more time, on June 13, 1929, at Tuy, to ask for the consecration of Russia to Her Immaculate Heart, which is also included as part of the overall approval of Fatima.

The 1930 approval of Fatima is interesting despite the problems the Church noticed during its investigation.

With all charity, respect to the Church, and all those who strongly believe in Fatima, I would like to bring up some of those seriously troubling problems about Fatima. If we were in normal times, I would have submitted this to the Holy See, but under the circumstances, this is impossible. Also, due to the same set of circumstances, I believe this information is critical for Catholics and the continued questioning to what happened to the Church since the death of Pope Pius X in 1914. The Second Vatican Council didn’t come out of thin air. Who’s really responsible for this Great Revolt that’s been brewing long before Vatican 2? Does Fatima hold a key?

The following information comes from the Critical Documentation of Fatima at fatima_critical1.pdf

In case one thinks the documentation is fake, one can also find much of the info in the 1950 book The True Story of Fatima | EWTN by Fr. John de Marchi, I.M.C.

First Problem

Clothing and jewelry that’s not proper for Our Lady

The children described Our Lady:

“The attire consisted of a white cloak that reached from the head to the bottom of the skirt, gold from the waist down, with the strings crossing it, and from top to bottom, and the edges were more closely spaced. The skirt was white all over, with gold strings running along and across, but only reaching to the knee; a white coat, not gold, with only two or three strings at the cuffs; no shoes, white stockings, not gold; around the neck was a gold chain with a medal at the tips; her hands were raised; she had very small buttons on her ears, very close to her ears; she parted her hands when she spoke; she had black eyes; she was of medium height.” (emphasis mine) (Fatima Doc. 1 1917-05-c.27 Interrogation of Father Manuel Marques Ferreira, parish priest of Fátima, to Lúcia de Jesus Santos about the first apparition.)

The apparition doesn’t appear to be Our Lady, especially with a skirt reaching only to the knee, with white stockings, necklace, and earrings. Imagine an image of Our Lady as described being reproduced and placed in churches to be venerated. The image shown above is the best most reverent image I could generate based on the children’s description. It should not be a problem having a statue as described in church by an apparition approved as worthy of belief, but it is a huge problem!

Second Problem and Serious Issue

Two Major False Prophecies from Fatima

If we go back to the day of the “miracle of the sun” Lucia was telling everyone on Oct. 13, 1917 that World War 1 would end that day. After the “miracle” of the sun on Oct. 13, Father Manuel Marques Ferreira interviewed Lucia on Oct. 16. Lucia tells him that Our Lady told her:

“I want to tell you not to offend Our Lord anymore; that they pray the rosary to Our Lady; build a little chapel here for Our Lady of the Rosary (Lúcia is unsure whether it was like that: build a little chapel here, I am Our Lady of the Rosary); the war ends today; wait here for your military, very soon.”

In another interview three days later on Oct. 19, 1917, she told Father Manuel Nunes Formigão STD, JCD:

She [Our Lady] said: “The war ends today; wait here for your soldiers very soon.”

Fr Formigão: Did she say: “wait here for your military” or “wait here for your soldiers”?

She said: “Wait here for the military.”

Fr Formigão: But look, the war is still going on!… The newspapers report that there have been fights since the thirteenth!… How can this be explained, if Our Lady said that the war ended on that day?

Lucia: I don’t know. I only know that I heard her say that the war would end on the 13th. I don’t know anything else

Fr Formigão: Some people say that they heard you say on that day that Our Lady had declared that the war would end soon. Is this true?

[Lucia] I said it just as Our Lady had said it.

Fr Formigão also asked Jacinta on the same day:

Did she say that the war would end that day or that it would end soon?

Jacinta: Our Lady said that when she got to heaven, the war would end.

Fr Formigão: But the war isn’t over yet!

Jacinta: It is ending, it is ending

Fr Formigão: But when will it end?

Jacinta: I think it ends on Sunday.

In yet another interview following Oct. 13, Father António dos Santos Alves writes:

[Our Lady] told [the children] that she was Our Lady of the Rosary; that the war ended that day; that our soldiers would soon come; that they were to build a chapel to Our Lady of the Rosary on the site of the apparition and that the people amend their sins that have greatly offended her Son.

If Lucia misunderstood back when she actually heard Our Lady, how is it that she would remember so clearly 20 years later when writing her memoirs?

The excuse given was that exhaustive interrogating to exhausted children caused them to get the date wrong. That might be the case for little Jacinta, but Lucia doubled-down, even triple-downed her assertion that the war would end on Oct. 13, 1917. The end of the war date would be one thing you would remember and Lucia most certainly remembered it!

This huge contradiction and weird description of Our Lady’s appearance are overlooked by the “miracle of the sun” and massive influence of the people in persuading the authorities to accepting the whole thing and approving belief in it.

Bottom line, Lucia got it wrong repeatedly, which is highly unlikely, indicating a false apparition. If she got it wrong so badly within a couple of days, how can we trust anything that she said, not to mention what she recounts by memory twenty years later as seen in her memoirs? Her own parish priest Father Manuel Marques Ferreira never believed the story even after the “miracle” of the sun. He thought it was all demonic!

The failed second prophecy is far worse!

Second False Prophecy and the Third Secret

Lucia told Father Augustin Fuentes on December 26, 1957,

“Father, the Most Holy Virgin is very sad because no one has paid any attention to Her message, neither the good nor the bad. The good continue on their way but without giving any importance to Her message. The bad, not seeing the punishment of God actually falling upon them, continue their life of sin without even caring about the message. But believe me, Father, God will chastise the world and this will be in a terrible manner. The punishment from Heaven is imminent.

Father, how much time is there before 1960 arrives? It will be very sad for everyone, not one person will rejoice at all if beforehand the world does not pray and do penance. I am not able to give any other details because it is still a secret. By the will of the Blessed Virgin, only the Holy Father and the Bishop of Fatima can know the secret. Both have chosen, however, not to open it in order not to be influenced by it.

This is the third part of the Message of Our Lady, which will remain secret until 1960.

Tell them, Father, that many times the most Holy Virgin told my cousins Francisco and Jacinta, as well as myself, that many nations will disappear from the face of the earth. She said that Russia will be the instrument of chastisement chosen by Heaven to punish the whole world if we do not beforehand obtain the conversion of that poor nation.

Father, the devil is in the mood for engaging in a decisive battle against the Blessed Virgin. And the devil knows what it is that most offends God and which in a short space of time will gain for him the greatest number of souls. Thus, the devil does everything to overcome souls consecrated to God, because in this way, the devil will succeed in leaving the souls of the faithful abandoned by their leaders, thereby the more easily will he seize them.

According to Lucia, part of the third secret is also part of the great chastisement that happens between 1957 and 1960.

Cardinal Ottaviani asked Lucia 1955 why not before 1960, and she said, “Because then it will seem clearer (mais claro).” In fact, she stated, “it cannot be made known before 1960.” When pressed to why it had to be in 1960, she and Bishop José Correia da Silva replied to Canon Barthas in 1946: “Because the Blessed Virgin wishes it so.”

We see wars and people dying in the first two secrets. In the third secret, we hear about another major chastisement which will happen between 1957 and 1960.

Lucia said the world (not the Church) was going to be punished severely. The world would understand the contents of the third secret when revealed in 1960 just as people would understand the second secret when revealed after the fact. (World War 2 and revealed by Lucia in 1941.)

Logically, the election of Roncalli couldn’t be this part of the secret because in 1960, virtually everyone believed him to be a true pope and rejoiced something Lucia said would not happen. There would be no rejoicing.

The secret couldn’t say we have a fake pope only to be revealed by a fake pope. Therefore, it couldn’t have referred to the pope as some type of imposter pope.

Another critical point is that Lucia said, “In Portugal the dogma of the Faith will always be preserved.”

If we draw an inference that this might mean apostasy in other places around the world, where would this be seen in 1960 from something from within 2 years prior to 1960?

The question is what kind of terrible chastisement would befall on the whole world that could be seen by 1960 that would be as big as the first two secrets to verify the prophecy was true? Again, we’re talking about part of the third secret because that is what Lucia said.

China was the only country to suffer a major chastisement with the Great Leap Forward (1958–1962), which caused the Great Chinese Famine, resulting in an estimated 15 to 55 million deaths. This is huge for China, but not the world.

Surely, the great chastisement Lucia is referring would be greater than China’s catastrophe.

Think of all the possibilities and what we find is absolutely nothing!

If any other religion put something out like this, we Catholics would call it out for what it is, a false prophecy, because that’s simply what it is.

We have another false prophecy. However, the Church did not approve this prophecy as told in 1957 as worthy of belief. It was unknown when approved in 1930. Is Lucia not trustworthy? Does the whole Fatima event and the false prophecies go hand in hand? Absolutely!

Third Problem and Serious Issue

Too many exceptions are needed.

Fatima is nothing like Lourdes and St. Bernadette. The message at Lourdes was nothing new to Catholicism. It confirmed a recent dogma. The three secrets were for Bernadette herself. Its message was simple with a miraculous healing spring as a reward for having faith. It was a beautiful and wonderful event in every way. No real problems, no real confusions.

Fatima on the other hand has everything Lourdes doesn’t: Problems, Confusions, Demands or else, and Major prophecies that don’t come as stated.

When the angel appeared in the beginning, he gave the children Communion. Jacinta and Francesco hadn’t even received their First Communion yet. When Francesco received from the Chalice, he asked Lucia what he had received because he was unaware of what it was.

There are several strange things about this occurrence. In the West, we don’t receive from the Chalice and preparation and knowledge of Communion is absolutely demanded for those of the age of reason. Infants don’t need to know because they are not able. However, when the Sacraments are given to those of the age of reason, it’s imperative to understand what’s being received except perhaps in cases of danger of death.

If the angel is truly from Heaven, why would he go against the norms of the Church on such an important thing as Holy Communion? How would or could you know he was truly from Heaven if the only way to test the spirit are by the norms of the Church?

In the West, we fast before Communion, but are we to expect the children had no breakfast that day? It’s possible, but it seems like one exception after another is needed to legitimize the event as coming from Heaven.

We are not told about the angel story in 1916 or 1917 but years later in 1937 and 1941 by Lucia through her memoirs. Why did it take over twenty years before we hear about this incredible angel story?

The problem with the story is the strange way Holy Communion was given to the children under the circumstances. St. John tells us, “believe not every spirit, but try the spirits if they be of God.” (I John 4:1) We test the spirits with Catholic belief and practice. Yet, the actions of the angel were contrary to Catholic belief and practice. However, the Church didn’t approve of the angel story because it came from the memoirs of Lucia over twenty years after the fact.

Lastly, if there’s no doctrinal problems with Fatima, does that mean receiving Communion without knowledge what’s being received at the age of reason not problematic doctrinally? If problematic, does that not call into question the approval by the Church? Should the Church not have warned or explained this problematic detail? Does the approval of Fatima call into question whether it’s really the Church doing the approving, especially in light of the missed prophecies?

Other problems with Fatima are covered in the Footnotes. However, these three suffice to show Fatima is not from Heaven.

What about the Miracle of the Sun?

The miracle of the sun was also seen many times at Medjugorja. I had friends who not only saw the miracle of the sun at Medjugorja, but their rosary beads turned to gold on each bead as they prayed it. They were strong believers in John Paul 2 and the Vatican 2 religion because of Medjugorja. Yet, these apparitions have blunt heresies even by Vatican 2 standards.

I have another friend who saw the miracle of the sun at Garabandal. The apparitions of Garabandal from 1961 to 1965 also have other spectacular miracles, yet its prophecies also failed miserably proving it to be a false apparition.

What I find interesting is that not all 70,000 people saw the “miracle” on that day as reported by apparitionists. Many reported seeing nothing unusual, which of course included the many skeptics, atheists, etc. the very ones that would need to see to believe. Everyone described the event quite differently, too.

The skeptical explanations for the “miracle” are also quite reasonable. In Pentecostal settings, we see how the power of suggestion make masses of people believe they’ve been “slain in the spirit.” I’ve seen it first-hand. “Speaking in tongues” is another example. We definitely see the power of suggestion at Fatima and many other places. Combine that with starring at the sun for a long period of time and then expecting to see something unusual. If a real weather condition happened on that day with all the other conditions, the event would certainly be magnified.

We read about this very thing in the book “God and the Sun of Fatima” written by the priest, physicist and philosopher of science, Father Stanley L Jaki, who believed in Fatima.

Fr. Jaki tells of the devout Catholic lawyer and Third Order Franciscan Domingo Pintos Coelho who was there in the Cova on Oct. 13, 1917. He published what he witnessed that day on Oct. 16^th in the local Catholic newspaper titled “Ordem.” (Keep in mind that in 1917, permission to write and publish on the Church was required as seen in canon law.)

Jaki didn’t like what Coelho wrote and breaks down everything he wrote to make Coelho appear to look irresponsible and/or faithless. However, Jaki was a strong believer in the miracle and he wouldn’t let anything get in his way in spreading what he believed was a miracle, but the fact remains that there is another side to the story.

Coelho wrote (p. 53): The leading newspapers began to speak of this case with great frequency and it will therefore be good not to reach a wrong conclusion before considering some ideas that rightly present themselves in cases of this nature. It is clear that as Catholics we accept the full possibility of the miracle. God, since He made the laws which rule natural phenomena, can also alter or suspend them. Simply put, a miracle is an exception. And exceptions are not presumed. They require certain proof. The Catholic Church has constantly insisted on the matter of proofs before it would agree to establishing the miraculous character of any fact of series of facts.

He continued in the next few pages…

In reference to what happened on Saturday the thirteenth, we can give witness because we were there, not as a pilgrim, note that well, but as a curious spectator.

From eleven until one-thirty the rain was constant and driven by a strong wind; a frankly rough and disagreeable weather which the enormous crowd of many thousands of people endured with excellent humor, without shelter other than rain hats and the vehicles, since not even one building is to be found in the vicinity.

Thirty-seven and a half minutes after one o’clock—or noon by solar time—was the hour set for the vision with which it was hoped that the phenomena in the heavens would coincide.

At this moment it continued to rain.

Some moments later the rain slackened and at one forty-five it stopped altogether. The sun, until then concealed, showed itself among the clouds that moved fairly fast. Because their density was variable, the veil which they threw over the king of stars [sun] was diaphanous. Like the multitude, we then looked toward the sun with rapt attention, and through the clouds, we saw it under new aspects—new for us, mark it well… Now surrounded by reddish flames, now with a ring of yellow or bright violet, now seemingly enlivened by a very rapid rotating movement, now even apparently detaching itself from the sky, approaching the earth, and giving forth a strong heat…

Why deny it? These phenomena, which we had never before witnessed, impressed us greatly. Among the crowds, a collective psychology established itself. And generally speaking there passed over the vast majority of that crowd a tremendous wave of faith that was very moving.

But then Coelho continues to explain….

One doubt remained with us, however.

Was what we saw in the sun an exceptional thing? Or could it be reproduced in analogous circumstances?

Now it was precisely this analogy of circumstances that presented itself to us yesterday [Sunday]. We could see the sun half overcast with clouds as on Saturday. And sincerely, we saw on that day the same succession of colors, the same rotary movement, etc.

(p. 57)

Coelho concluded his article:

Eliminating, then, the only extraordinary fact, what remains? Right now, the statements of the three children and nothing else.

It is very little.

Will the children be found sincere? We have no reason to doubt that they will be; their humble state is a guarantee of this for us.

We ask pardon for the crabbed stories of the investigators of popular belief who have attributed mysterious profit motives to the shepherds, for not believing this story without proof. Do the strongminded [espiritos fortes or freethinkers] want us to believe without proof? Very well. But with the same right we could demand from those who see in all this but Jesuit trickeries the same proofs they demand from us, regardless of whether they find them inconvenient and therefore dispense with them.

In sum, we returned from Fatima in the same state of mind in which we went there—in doubt.

Was there a miracle, were there apparitions? It is possible but between possibility and reality there is an abyss.

We will therefore continue with an open mind, benevolent, if so desired, but nothing more.

And let us be permitted to advise those who by their position and intelligence can influence others not to go beyond this limit.

(pp. 59-60)

After this article was published on Oct. 16^th, 1917, Coelho published another article the next day Oct. 17, again, talking about Fatima.

If miracles are rare today, it does not mean that they can no longer occur. For example, the lives of Don Bosco, the founder of the Salesians, and of the Curé d’ Ars were full of miracles. The history of Lourdes is also a series of miracles verified with the greatest rigor. …

St. Augustine says: “A miracle should never be proclaimed when a natural explanation is possible”.

This rule has always been scrupulously observed by the Church, the teacher of truth.

Now what did we say about the case of Fatima? That we, the obscure author of these lines, had not observed any fact that would prompt us to consider as supernatural. But not only did we treat it from a personal and unauthorized point of view but in no way did we wish to disclaim the observations which others have made and which differ from ours.

We would want nothing more than to witness events to which no natural explanation can be fitted. Our disappointment was great, when on Sunday, as we said, we verified the vacuity of what on the day before had seemed to be miraculous; our disappointment was heightened since we were greatly impressed by the coincidence that the rain of three hours’ duration had stopped almost exactly at the moment when the children prayed, and that the sun then appeared in the clouds.

Simply put, it is necessary in a matter of such weight not to yield to the principle Quod vohumus facile credimus.

We therefore conclude as we did yesterday: it is fitting to replace premature enthusiasm with the most prudent reserve. If in Fatima there is something of the supernatural our holding back will not impede the march of events upon which God in His infinite wisdom has decided.

On the other hand, a fiasco following hasty exaltation would not fail to be exploited by the enemies of the Church; they are always numerous, very active, and constantly on the watch for the propitious moment for the attack.

End of Coelho.

Coelho called the “Miracle of the Sun” vacuous and he got backlash immediately by other papers. I included this report to show there was another side, which many apparitionists don’t include in their stories. Jaki was an exception.

Simply put, the “miracle” of the sun doesn’t prove a heavenly apparition. The devout Catholic lawyer and writer who witnessed the event didn’t even think it was miraculous and publicly tells us so in two articles in a Catholic magazine within a week of the “miracle”. The same so-called miracle of the sun is seen at all the modern apparition sites, which we know are false. Yet, it was this very “miracle” that has convinced most Catholics that Fatima is a true apparition from Heaven.

Conclusion

The prophecies definitely failed. Is that the fault of Fatima or Lucia? We don’t separate the two. However, we know that Garabandal was false precisely because of the false prophecies. Why are the false prophecies of Fatima overlooked?

People would rather believe in a hoax, a deception of the devil, or any lie if it makes them feel better. The pope, many bishops, and many theologians and canonists have bought into Fatima but that doesn’t mean it’s true. They bought into Our Lady of Guadalupe apparition and it’s a proven myth where the Church tells us Marcos Aquino painted the image and not a single priest historian during that time mentions Juan Diego or the apparition while telling the whole history of Mexico. They even explain the millions of converts. See footnote [2] for the proof.

The Church has declared that nothing in the Fatima apparition is heretical or dangerous morally or doctrinally. However, is it possible the Fatima apparitions are a demonic deception as a distraction to something else? For instance, what was really behind the Spanish Flu and Vaccines? See page 27 of the COVID-Report-from-Rep.-Weyler-3.pdf

Both Jacinta and Francisco Marto were killed by the Spanish Flu. 100 million people died from this chastisement that’s never mentioned by “Our Lady” of Fatima. That’s as many people as both world wars put together! How could the Spanish Flu be overlooked? How is it still overlooked? This missed cataclysmic catastrophe is enough to call into doubt the whole Fatima event as something not from Heaven! Besides the Flu, what about the vaccines? We don’t even know the real death numbers to all the vaccinated throughout the last 100 years.

What’s more, even the Chinese catastrophe is overlooked when Lucia said the whole world would suffer some great chastisement between 1957 to 1960 that never came to pass.

Another possible deception by distraction concerns the Church. Is Fatima a demonic plan hidden within the demonic plan? What was going on with the Church then? After all, following the death of Pope Pius X, his successor, Pope Benedict XV, immediately began to ease the intense crackdown on “Modernism” that had characterized the previous pontificate. One of his first moves was to remove the staunch anti-modernist Cardinal Merry del Val as Secretary of State and replaced him with the liberal Cardinal Pietro Gasparri.

In his first encyclical Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum, Benedict XV requested that the accusations of modernism stop. He writes, “23 As regards matters in which without harm to faith or discipline – in the absence of any authoritative intervention of the Apostolic See – there is room for divergent opinions, it is clearly the right of everyone to express and defend his own opinion. But in such discussions no expressions should be used which might constitute serious breaches of charity; let each one freely defend his own opinion, but let it be done with due moderation, so that no one should consider himself entitled to affix on those who merely do not agree with his ideas the stigma of disloyalty to faith or to discipline.”

Other key individuals who regained freedom of action or saw their previous restrictions eased include Moderate Modernist sympathizers and scholars. The Sodalitium Pianum (a network of informants established by Pius X) was largely ended by Benedict XV. Those who had been ostracized or prevented from teaching under the anti-modernist oath were given more freedom.

Many of the French clergy who were under intense pressure during the separation of church and state (and accused of being too compromising) found more space for dialogue under Benedict XV. The anti-modernist plan under Pope Pius X never returned and we begin to see the ugly head of modernism in the hideous architecture of church building and women getting into public offices throughout the pontificates of Benedict XV, Pius XI, and Pius XII.

Are we really surprised we got a Second Vatican Council? Talk about cataclysmic doom!

We see more Fatima issues in our times with all kinds of ideas and conspiracies floating around with the 3rd secret predictions, consecration of Russia, the triumph of the Immaculate Heart, etc. all of which have nothing to do with the real Gospel, and which confuse the end times as told in Scripture. There’s no end to Fatima predictions, which are borderline heretical if not heretical. Just more distractions.

All these are the bad fruits of Fatima and there’s more bad tasting fruit waiting for you in footnote [3].

We know how Pope Leo XIII in the 1880’s tells us how in his vision Christ gives the Devil the time and power to deceive the Church. Was Fatima part of that plan in the grand scheme of things?

Based on these and other problems, Fatima appears to be a real and great deception of the devil to fool the masses to distract from something far greater!

Footnotes:

[1] CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Private Revelations

[2] Problems with the Story of Our Lady of Guadalupe – Part I

Problems with the Story of Our Lady of Guadalupe – Part II

[3] Other problems with Fatima include:

Fatima becomes a tool for the Vatican 2 religion

Roncalli (“Pope John XXIII”) read the contents of the third secret. He knew the prophecy and the fact that it hadn’t come to pass. He said the third secret was not for “our times” and he refused to reveal it. Cardinal Silvio Oddi confronted him over not revealing the secret in 1960. John XXIII told Oddi, “Do not speak to me of this again.” It seems he refused to read the third secret in 1960 because he it didn’t square with his plans. Did he even believe in Fatima, since he refused to do what was supposed to be asked of him? It would appear not. In 1962, at the Second Vatican Council, John XXIII referred to the three seers of Fatima as “Prophets of Doom.”

One thing is for sure, Fatima can be useful, everyone knew it, and it was!

John XXIII called Fatima, “the center of all Christian hopes.” Fatima was used to bolster the Vatican 2 teaching on Our Lady.

Fatima was later used by John Paul 2 to legitimize his legacy as the Marian and Fatima Pope. The attempted assassination of John Paul 2 in 1981, occurred exactly at the same time as the apparition of Our Lady in Fatima, and it is believed by many Vatican 2 Catholics that Our Lady of Fatima saved the life of their beloved pope.

John Paul II visited Fatima, Portugal, three times (1982, 1991, 2000) to thank Our Lady for saving his life during the May 13, 1981, assassination attempt. He famously placed the bullet that struck him into the crown of the Fatima statue, formally consecrated the world to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, and beatified the shepherd children Francisco and Jacinta.

The Vatican revealed what they called the third secret which stated that the “Holy Father…was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him.” It continues to say other clergy, religious, and lay people were also killed one after another in the same place.

The Vatican left out anything about apostasy or anything like that. As bad as their obvious fake third secret was, the Vatican also claimed the secret referred to the assassination attempt on John Paul 2.

If Sister Lucia died at some point around 1960 as many think and replaced with an imposter, the Vatican would use her to legitimize itself. For instance, the Lucia of 1984 said John Paul II’s consecration of Russia fulfilled the request of Our Lady.

She is used in many other ways that’s irrelevant insofar as this article is concerned, but the point is Vatican 2 Catholics are hooked on Fatima because it points to their “Pope” and “Saint” John Paul 2.

Whether or not the 1984 Lucia was the real one or not (I think not), Fatima is constantly in the forefront in the minds of everyone who calls himself Catholic.

A fake Lucia keeps the Fatima deception going for Vatican 2 Catholics believing John Paul 2 was great and the Vatican 2 religion is true, or perhaps expecting a pope to consecrate Russia correctly as asked. Many traditional Catholics expect a pope to consecrate Russia so that the nation converts to Catholicism. Many sedevantists are expecting a special triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary where a Church comes out of this great apostasy with a true pope because that’s how Fatima is interpreted.

We know that Our Lady would know the future as even Fatima indicates. Would she present herself at Fatima knowing full well how Fatima is used against real Catholicism with so much vagueness, confusion, and division? Perhaps, but it also seems to fit the biblical prophecy in II Thess. 2:10.

Fatima keeps people in the Vatican 2 religion.

Unnecessary cause for division among Catholics and contradiction

Almost no Catholic says the Fatima prayer in the Rosary correctly. William Thomas Walsh interviewed Lucia and she flatly denied what Fr. Jenkins of the SSPV said about it. It’s on page 225 of the 1947 book Our Lady of Fatima:

“In many books about Fatima, the prayer Our Lady asked you to say after the decades of the Rosary is given in some such form as this: ‘O my Jesus, pardon our sins, save us from the fire of hell, have mercy on the souls in Purgatory, especially the most abandoned.’ Is that correct?” “No, it is not,” she replied positively. “The correct form is the one I have written in my account of the apparition on July 13: ‘O my Jesus, pardon us, and save us from the fire of hell; draw all souls to heaven, especially those in most need.”

What happens when those who believe are mixed with those who don’t believe when praying the Rosary together? This may not be a big deal but the next thing I’ll mention most certainly is.

Apparitionists demand Fatima be believed and accepted when the Church demands no such thing. While it permits belief in Fatima, it doesn’t demand it. The Church doesn’t say Fatima is true.

However, the message is for the pope to do something or else. Acceptance of Fatima becomes critical.

If Fatima is true, then the pope better do it and do it right. It’s not just about believing or not believing a private revelation. Lives are at stake because Communism is the most murderous state ever seen in history. Accepting, believing, and obeying Fatima concerns the expansion of Communism and the results thereof.

There’s a threat to the world if the pope doesn’t do what’s asked in a private revelation. It really fuels the apparitionists demand for belief and in a strong way vindicates apparitionists in their position on apparitions. How can such a condition be merely a private revelation that may or may not be accepted? It just so happens that Pope Pius XII nor any Vatican 2 pope did what Our Lady of Fatima asked, so did any of them truly believe in Fatima?

Fatima is a private revelation, yet it demands belief outside of the usual parameters of the Catholic Faith, which is precisely what a private revelation can’t do or can it? We have major divisions and animosity over an apparition.

ORIGINAL FIRST DRAFT BELOW

The Great Fatima Distraction?

What is not an opinion is the Church saying a private revelation is worthy of belief. When the Church says a private revelation is worthy of belief, it means it’s free from doctrinal or moral error, and this declaration must be accepted and believed. However, the Church saying a private revelation, such as an apparition is worthy of belief, it doesn’t imply it’s free from historical inaccuracies, silly ideas, fraud, or demonic activity. It may have all of the above.

The Mystical City of God by Mary of Agreda was approved by the Church. However, there are errors in the work. The Catholic Encyclopedia states:

Yet, in 1900, Pope Leo XIII granted an Apostolic Blessing to a Canadian lay woman who informed the pope of printing a book of all the instructions found at the end of each chapter in The Mystical City of God. Pope Leo XIII then ordered the book to be printed on the presses of the Sacred Congregation of the Propaganda in Rome. The book titled Sublime doctrine de la Mère de Dieu sur les vertus chrétiennes (extrait de la ‘Cité mystique de Dieu’ par le Vén. Marie d’Agreda- Rome, Impr.de la Sacrée Congrégation de la Propagande, 1900. vii + 403pp.+ frontispiece.)

When I wrote about the problems with the apparition of Our Lady of Guadalupe [2], I discovered problems with the Fatima apparitions.

Much of what we’re told by Lucia of Fatima comes 20 years after the apparitions.

The 1930 approval of Fatima is interesting considering some problems the Church noticed during its investigation.

With all charity, respect to the Church, and all those who strongly believe in Fatima, I would like to bring up some those seriously troubling issues about Fatima. The following information comes from the Critical Documentation of Fatima at fatima_critical1.pdf

In case one thinks the documentation is fake, one can also find much of the info in the 1950 book The True Story of Fatima | EWTN by Fr. John de Marchi, I.M.C.

First Issue

Our Lady’s clothing and jewelry are not proper for Our Lady

The children described Our Lady:

“The attire consisted of a white cloak that reached from the head to the bottom of the skirt, gold from the waist down, with the strings crossing it, and from top to bottom, and the edges were more closely spaced. The skirt was white all over, with gold strings running along and across, but only reaching to the knee; a white coat, not gold, with only two or three strings at the cuffs; no shoes, white stockings, not gold; around the neck was a gold chain with a medal at the tips; her hands were raised; she had very small buttons on her ears, very close to her ears; she parted her hands when she spoke; she had black eyes; she was of medium height.” (emphasis mine) (Fatima Doc. 1 1917-05-c.27 Interrogation of Father Manuel Marques Ferreira, parish priest of Fátima, to Lúcia de Jesus Santos about the first apparition.)

The bottom line, the apparition doesn’t appear to be Our Lady. If we made an image of Our Lady as described, would it be accepted by the Church, reproduced, and placed inside churches? After all, it should not be problem with a statue as described in church by an apparition approved as worthy of belief.

Second Serious Issue

Two Major False Prophecies from Fatima

If we go back to the day of the “miracle of the sun” Lucia was telling everyone on Oct. 13, 1917 that WW1 would end that day. After the “miracle” of the sun on Oct. 13, Father Manuel Marques Ferreira interviewed Lucia on Oct. 16. Lucia tells him that Our Lady told her:

In another interview three days later on Oct. 19, 1917, she told Father Manuel Nunes Formigão STD, JCD:

She [Our Lady] said: “The war ends today; wait here for your soldiers very soon.”

Fr Formigão: Did she say: “wait here for your military” or “wait here for your soldiers”?

She said: “Wait here for the military.”

Lucia: I don’t know. I only know that I heard her say that the war would end on the 13th. I don’t know anything else

Fr Formigão: Some people say that they heard you say on that day that Our Lady had declared that the war would end soon. Is this true?

[Lucia] I said it just as Our Lady had said it.

Fr Formigão also asked Jacinta on the same day:

Did she say that the war would end that day or that it would end soon?

Jacinta: Our Lady said that when she got to heaven, the war would end.

Fr Formigão: But the war isn’t over yet!

Jacinta: It is ending, it is ending

Fr Formigão: But when will it end?

Jacinta: I think it ends on Sunday.

In yet another interview following Oct. 13, Father António dos Santos Alves writes:

If Lucia misunderstood back when she actually heard Our Lady, how is it that she would remember so clearly 20 years later when writing her memoirs?

The excuse that exhaustive interrogating to exhausted children caused them to get the date wrong. That might be the case for little Jacinta, but Lucia doubled-down, even triple-downed her assertion that the war would end on Oct. 13, 1917. The end of the war date would be one thing you would remember and Lucia most certainly remembered it!

This huge contradiction and weird description of Our Lady’s appearance are overlooked by the miracle of the sun and massive influence of the people in persuading the authorities to accepting the whole thing and approving belief in it.

Bottom line, Lucia got it wrong repeatedly at the time or the apparition is false. If she got it wrong so badly within a week, how can we trust her memory twenty years later from her memoirs? Her own parish priest Father Manuel Marques Ferreira never believed the story even after the “miracle” of the sun. He thought it was all demonic!

The second prophecy is far worse!

Second False Prophecy and the Third Secret

Lucia told Father Augustin Fuentes on December 26, 1957,

This is the third part of the Message of Our Lady, which will remain secret until 1960.

According to Lucia, part of the third secret is also part the great chastisement that happens between 1957 and 1960.

We see wars and people dying in the first two secrets. In the third secret, we hear about another major chastisement which will happen between 1957 and 1960.

The secret couldn’t say we have a fake pope only to be revealed by a fake pope. Therefore, it couldn’t have referred to the pope as some type of imposter pope.

Another critical point is that Lucia said, “In Portugal the dogma of the Faith will always be preserved.”

If we draw an inference that this might mean apostasy in other places around the world, where would this be seen in 1960?

Think of all the possibilities and what we find absolutely nothing!

If any other religion put something out like this, we Catholics would call it out for what it is, a false prophecy, because that’s simply what it is.

Bottom line, we have another false prophecy. However, the Church did not approve this prophecy as told in 1957 as worthy of belief. It was unknown when approved in 1930. Again, was the approval in 1930 provisional? Is Lucia not trustworthy? Does the whole Fatima event and the false prophecies go hand in hand? Absolutely!

Third Serious Issue

Too many exceptions are needed.

Fatima on the other hand has everything Lourdes doesn’t. Problems, confusions, demands or else, and major prophecies that don’t come as stated.

In the West, we fast before Communion, but are we to expect the children had no breakfast? It’s possible, but it seems like one exception after another is needed to legitimize the event as coming from Heaven.

We are not told about the angel story in 1917 but years later in 1937 and 1941 by Lucia and her memoirs.

The bottom line is the radically strange way Holy Communion was given to the children under the circumstances, where the testing the spirit with Catholic belief and practice is impossible. However, the Church didn’t approve of this story of the Angel as it came from the memoirs of Lucia over twenty years after the fact. Again, is Lucia trustworthy and was the approval provisional?

Other problems with Fatima are covered in the Footnotes. However, these three suffice to show Fatima is not from Heaven.

What about the Miracle of the Sun?

We read about this very thing in the book “God and the Sun of Fatima” written by the priest, physicist and philosopher of science, Father Stanley L Jaki, who believed in Fatima.

He continued in the next few pages…

In reference to what happened on Saturday the thirteenth, we can give witness because we were there, not as a pilgrim, note that well, but as a curious spectator.

Thirty-seven and a half minutes after one o’clock—or noon by solar time—was the hour set for the vision with which it was hoped that the phenomena in the heavens would coincide.

At this moment it continued to rain.

But then Coelho continues to explain….

One doubt remained with us, however.

Was what we saw in the sun an exceptional thing? Or could it be reproduced in analogous circumstances?

(p. 57)

Coelho concluded his article:

Eliminating, then, the only extraordinary fact, what remains? Right now, the statements of the three children and nothing else.

It is very little.

Will the children be found sincere? We have no reason to doubt that they will be; their humble state is a guarantee of this for us.

In sum, we returned from Fatima in the same state of mind in which we went there—in doubt.

Was there a miracle, were there apparitions? It is possible but between possibility and reality there is an abyss.

We will therefore continue with an open mind, benevolent, if so desired, but nothing more.

And let us be permitted to advise those who by their position and intelligence can influence others not to go beyond this limit.

(pp. 59-60)

After this article was published on Oct. 16^th, 1917, Coelho published another article the next day Oct. 17, again, talking about Fatima.

St. Augustine says: “A miracle should never be proclaimed when a natural explanation is possible”.

This rule has always been scrupulously observed by the Church, the teacher of truth.

Simply put, it is necessary in a matter of such weight not to yield to the principle Quod vohumus facile credimus.

End of Coelho.

The bottom line, the “miracle” of the sun doesn’t prove a heavenly apparition. To one devout Catholic who witnessed the event didn’t even think it was miraculous and publicly tells us so in two articles in a Catholic magazine within a week of the “miracle”. The same so-called miracle of the sun is seen at all the modern apparition sites, which we know are false. Yet, it was this very “miracle” that has convinced most Catholics that Fatima is a true apparition from Heaven.

Conclusion

The prophecies definitely failed. Is that the fault of Fatima or Lucia? It’s hard to separate the two. However, we know that Garabandal was false precisely because of the false prophecies. Why are the false prophecies of Fatima overlooked?

Lastly, the Church has declared that nothing in the Fatima apparition is heretical or dangerous morally or doctrinally. However, is it possible the Fatima apparitions are a demonic deception as a distraction to something else? For instance, what was really behind the Spanish Flu and Vaccines? See page 27 of the COVID-Report-from-Rep.-Weyler-3.pdf

Both Jacinta and Francisco Marto were killed by the Spanish Flu. 100 million people died from this chastisement that’s never mentioned by Our Lady of Fatima. That’s as many or more people than both world wars put together! How could the Spanish Flu be overlooked? How is it still overlooked?

Another possible deception concerns what was then the future of the Church. Is Fatima a demonic plan hidden within the demonic plan? All kinds of ideas floating around Fatima predictions, consecration of Russia, the triumph of the Immaculate Heart, etc. all of which have nothing to do with the real Gospel and confuse the end times as Scripture tells us.

These all are the bad fruits of Fatima.

We know how Pope Leo XIII in the 1880’s tells us how in his vision Christ gives the Devil the time and power to deceive the Church. Was Fatima part of that plan in the grand scheme of things? After all, the whole reason we pray the St. Michael prayer after mass is because of Satan’s plan to destroy the Church. Pius XI shorten the prayer in 1934 and leaves out those critical points Pope Leo XIII put in the prayer. See the Original St. Michael Prayer of Pope Leo XIII. Why was the crackdown on modernists put to an end after Pope Pius X?

I don’t know how you get around the false prophecies, but it looks to me to be another great deception of the devil to fool the masses to distract from something far greater.

Check out Footnote 3 to see more of the Fatima deception.

Footnotes:

[1] CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Private Revelations

[2] Problems with the Story of Our Lady of Guadalupe – Part I

Problems with the Story of Our Lady of Guadalupe – Part II

Russia the ultimate successor to the Illuminati

Timothy Fitzpatrick — Mon, 30 Mar 2026 03:03:29 +0000

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 29, 2026 Anno Domini

There are two prevailing beliefs about the Illuminati that both misunderstand what the term really means.

Probably the most common belief is that the Illuminati is just a conspiracy theory that mentally unstable people use to describe a shadowy, faceless group of world conspirators they believe are after them. The other prevailing belief says that the Illuminati is an umbrella term for elite men who rely on occult means to subvert and control the world.

The former is your typical dismissive skeptic that tends to think that conspiracies are rare, if present at all in this world, while the latter is actually the partially correct belief.

Through the use of Jewish Gnosticism and its various strains—Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism, Theosophy, etc.—the Bavarian Illuminati of failed Catholic Adam Weishaupt (1748–1830) sought to influence those holding power so that the group could eventually gain control of the world—the cartoonish “plotting for world domination”. As corny as that might sound, it seems that really was/is the plan.

The Illuminati were perhaps the first Communists, in a sense, as they realized ways of subverting society that mirror some of the ways modern Communists subvert society: deconstructing religion (especially Christianity), promoting immorality, internationalism, and abolishing private property. I won’t get too deep into the history of the Bavarian Illuminati, because there are better men who have written a great deal more about it and it’s not the focus of this article (for more on the Illuminati, see Jesuit priest Augustin Barruel’s Memoirs Illustrating the History of Jacobinism [1797], the quintessential book exposing the Illuminist conspiracy). While encyclopaedias of the world admit the existence of Weishaupt’s Illuminati as some group of those believing themselves to be enlightened, they further obscure the true meaning of this term by leaving it ill defined.

So, what exactly is the Illuminati?

The Illuminati are a group who use illuminism to achieve their ends. Therefore, the Illuminati are those who adhere to the method or tactic of illuminism. But what is illuminism? It’s a system. The method of illuminism is quite simply what is known today as blackmail (the criminal act of coercion using threats). Weishaupt allegedly came up with the idea of a systematic form of blackmail by observing the Catholic sacrament of penance (confession) and adapting it to a form outside of its sacramental Catholic use. Instead of having men’s secrets (sins) confessed to a priest and dissipated into the air of the sacramental chamber (confession booth) and ultimately absolved by God, why not, Weishaupt must’ve though, extract these secrets so that they could be used against men to get them to do what the Illuminati want them to do, through exploitation or extortion? What was forgotten and forgiven sins in the Catholic confessional could now become compromising material for ongoing use.

Late British author Nesta Webster quotes Weishaupt,

“Every person shall be made a spy on another and on all around him…friends, relations, enemies, those who are indifferent—all without exception shall be the object of his inquiries; he shall attempt to discover their strong side and their weak, their passions, their prejudices, their connections, above all, their actions—in a word, the most detailed information about them.”^[1]

If illuminism means blackmail then the Illuminati ought to mean the blackmailers.

Weishaupt and his successors likely first experimented with illuminism on their own members (the Hollywood film The Skulls portrays this brilliantly) and then later brought it out into the general population for its ultimate use. Blackmailing chiefs of police, magistrates, monarchs, even clerics, must’ve become common wherever the Illuminati slithered about.

Minerva

Initially, Weishaupt created the group the Perfectibilists, which was later renamed to the Illuminati. The Perfectibilists adopted the owl of Minerva as their symbol. Minvera (Athena, to the Greeks) was a Roman goddess associated with strategic warfare. She is sometimes depicted with an owl on her shoulder.

“To the Romans, an owl feather placed near sleeping people would prompt them to speak in their sleep and reveal their secrets,” writes author Cassandra Eason.^[2]

As an example of Minerva’s prowess, she is said to have devised the Trojan horse strategy that fooled the Trojans and paved the way for the Greeks to enter and conquer Troy. It seems likely that this strategic genius of Minerva’s was one of the reasons for the Illuminati’s adoption of her symbol.

(The American secret society known as Bohemian Grove adopted the symbol of the owl based on its wisdom. Could it also be related to Minerva and her strategic intelligence?)

While various secret societies throughout history have likely used blackmail to achieve their objectives, in the legacy of Weishaupt’s Illuminati, there is really only one power that has systematized and honed the concept of illuminism (blackmail) down to a science, and that is the Soviet Union, specifically it’s security forces, the CHEKA-NKVD-KGB-FSB. Just as Weishaupt used compromising material on his targets as his primary method of gaining control over them, the Soviets also have used compromising material (from which the Soviet Russian term kompromat [компрометирующий материал] derives) to achieve their strategic ends. Although kompromat has been going on since the Soviet Union was founded, what better proof of its continued and successful use is there than of the present controversy of the Jeffrey Epstein sex scandal, a kompromat operation that is global and seems to involve just about everyone in the power structure of the West?

Kompromat is illuminism.

Illuminism is Kompromat.

The KGB and its predecessors were known for secretly arresting or murdering enemies of the Revolution in the middle of the night. Proto-Communist Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, who was alive during the formation of the Bavarian Illuminati and may well have been a member, in his Philosophy of Right (1820) writes, “the owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of the dusk.” Although the KGB doesn’t use an owl in its emblem, it does use a sword-on-shield symbol that could be related to Minerva and her sword and shield. The shield and especially the sword are prominent symbols in Freemasonry and the Kabbalah. The flaming sword (pointing downward like the KGB’s sword), according to the Kabbalah, represents divine energy’s dialectical path through the Tree of Life (Sephiroth).

The path of the flaming sword.

“As you contemplate the Flaming Sword’s path, you’ll notice it doesn’t follow a straight line but rather moves in a precise pattern that mirrors the flash of lightning. It’s a reminder that spiritual energy doesn’t manifest directly but transforms through various stages of consciousness.”^[3]

The above explanation reveals that the flaming sword travels not in a straight line but in a zig-zagging pattern (dialectically). In the occult world, white and black magic or good and evil are used to bring about a desired end. The various stages of consciousness spoken by kabbalist gurus seem to be the same as the various alchemical stages of the dialectical method.

“Russia will become the capital of Kabbalah,” writes Russian rabbi Michael Laitman. “Marxism-Leninism prepared us for Kabbalah.”^[4] Materialistic atheism in the Soviet Union was merely a stage (a zag) travelling down the flaming sword of the dialectical method. Laitman suggests that belief in Kabbalah was the ultimate end of this seeming Communist flaming sword.

We can see how this applies to the KGB’s use of controlled opposition (like the Soviet Trust^[5]) to bring about a certain synthesis from the conflict between two seemingly opposing forces (in controlled opposition operations, the two sides are not naturally opposing forces, although they can be initially, but are manipulated by the power running the op). Similarly, the KGB’s offshoot, the Israeli Mossad^[6], has as its motto by way of deception thou shalt do war.

“… there are three major ‘hooks’ for recruiting people: money; emotion, be it revenge or ideology; and sex,” former Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky revealed in his book By Way of Deception.^[7] Reading between the lines here, Ostrovsky seems to suggest that those who can’t be bought or be exploited through appeal to their ideology are given sex, and when that fails, the sex can be turned into blackmail (likely how the KGB hooked Donald Trump to do their bidding). Where does Weishaupt’s network begin and the KGB/Mossad’s end?

Kabbalist legend of angel Raziel with the flaming sword pointed downward.

Deception can be said to be a dialectical tactic (one lies [use of evil] to bring about a supposed good). Therefore, the Kabbalah’s flaming sword becomes even more realized in the KGB’s use of the sword in its emblem.

The KGB shield has six outer points, which correspond to the six outer points of the Kabbalah’s Sephirot. Furthermore, on top of the sword and shield in the KGB emblem are the Soviet five-pointed star (pentagram) and the hammer and sickle—both of which can have Kabbalistic meaning. Revolutionary Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) associated the origin of Soviet five-pointed star with the Jewish false messiah Simon Bar-Kochba, according to historian Woflgang Akunov^[8], and a standing member of the current Russian Duma belonging to the Russian Federation Communist Party, Vladimir Nikitin, oddly admitted, “a five-pointed star, even in the Jewish Kabbalah, is a symbol of activity and victory.”^[9] What’s more, Russian rabbi Avraham Shmulevich claims that “the Communists (Soviets) used Kabbalistic symbolism…the hammer and sickle reproduces the letters of the (Hebrew) word ‘Shaddai’ with their shape.” Shmulevich concludes, “God (shaddai) is the father of the Revolution.”^[10]

While the Soviet system has relied on materialistic atheism as a cover for its secret purpose^[11], it seems likely that the KGB was instituted in the spirit of the Illuminati and its Kabbalistic occult forces, with blackmail and controlled opposition being among its primary tactics.

Notes:

Webster, Nesta, World Revolution. The Plot Against Civilization, Small, Maynard & Company, 1921, pg. 14 ↑
Eason, Cassandra, Fabulous Creatures, Mythical Monsters, and Animal Power Symbols: A Handbook, Bloomsbury Academic, 2008, pg. 71 ↑
Mystiphora, 12 Kabbalistic Symbols And Their Hidden Meanings, Jan. 7, 2025 – https://mystiphora.com/12-kabbalistic-symbols-and-their-hidden-meanings/ ↑
Laitman, Michael, ‘Russia will become the capital of Kabbalah…Marxism-Leninism prepared us for Kabbalah’: rabbi Michael Laitman, Feb. 24, 2003, IZ – https://fitzinfo.net/2024/02/22/russia-will-become-the-capital-of-kabbalah-rabbi-michael-laitman/ ↑
Piper, Michael Collins, The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within, American Free Press, 2006, pgs. 64-66 – https://fitzinfo.net/2018/03/08/controlled-opposition/ ↑
Aviv, Juval, Juval Aviv is the real Zohan, Youtube, Steve Hager, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOMHEHd8XtY&t=61s ↑
Ostrovsky, Victor, By Way of Deception, St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1990, pg. 91 ↑
Akunov, Wolfgang, About the roots of Bolshevik symbolism, 2008, Proza – https://fitzinfo.net/forum/topic/trotsky-referred-to-origin-of-soviet-five-pointed-star-with-jewish-false-messiah-simon-bar-kochba-historian-akunov/#postid-2139 ↑
Nikitin, Vladimir, Congratulations on the 75th anniversary of the Victory from the VSD “Russian Fad”, KPRF, May 7, 2020 – https://fitzinfo.net/forum/topic/a-five-pointed-star-even-in-the-jewish-kabbalah-is-a-symbol-of-activity-and-victory-russia-cprf-duma-deputy-vladimir-nikitin-on-soviet-victory-day-anniversary/ ↑
Shmulevich, Avraham, Mysticism and world domination – HyperZionism is a social practical Kabbalah, APN, Nov. 23, 2009 – https://fitzinfo.net/2026/02/03/kabbalah-is-a-political-doctrine-a-political-weapon-rabbi-avraham-shmulevich/ ↑
Sulam, Baal, Late Jewish sage Baal Sulman explains how Communism is the ultimate objective of Kabbalah – https://fitzinfo.net/2024/08/25/late-jewish-sage-baal-sulman-explains-how-communism-is-the-ultimate-objective-of-kabbalah/ ↑

Evidence suggests Epstein hasidic, member of Chabad Lubavitch

Timothy Fitzpatrick — Wed, 04 Feb 2026 19:58:02 +0000

Vladimir Putin’s childhood KOMSOMOL buddy and fellow Kabbalist Russian TV personality Vladimir Solovyov wearing his hasidic tefillin iin Jerusalem with another Chabadnik. He admitted that, “I personally gave the Kabbalistic book Zohar to many members of the Cabinet of Ministers and (Russia) State Duma deputies. And I know they read it’

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
February 4, 2026 Anno Domini

We are only beginning to understand the depths of Jeffrey Epstein’s Soviet-Jewish world of espionage and kompromat, thanks to the latest declassification by the U.S. Department of Justice.

An exchange between Epstein and his New York doctor friend Harry Fisch—a urologist specializing in vasectomy—suggests that Epstein was a practitioner of hasidic (or chassidic) Judaism, which is a mystical branch of Judaism heavily tied with politics, power, and organized crime across the world.

In the exchange from June 2018, Fisch talked about he and Epstein obtaining tefillin, which is a phylactery hasidic Jews place on their body during prayer. It involves a black cube placed on one’s forehead and a strap wrapped around one’s arm.

Schneerson with tefillin.

“Pizza and grape soda tomorrow for lunch? We can also buy tefillin for Woody,” Fisch said to Epstein.

(The Pizzagate crowd are interpreting this as some kind of code for pedophilia, but clearly it is literal. We wouldn’t expect these sensationalists to bother checking out what tefillin is.)

“They sell tefillin on Lex and 84th street,…lets (sic) get tefillin,” Fisch said later. The document ends after showing that Epstein had read it.

It’s possible that Fisch meant that he and Epstein buy tefillin for only Woody and that neither Fisch nor Epstein are hassids, but on the other hand, all three of them could be. The DOJ release shows many mailing lists to which Epstein was subscribed, and several are to Jewish organizations, including Chabad Lubavitch; an email from Chabadnik Rabbi Menachem Katz talking about putting on tefillin; and an email from Chabadnik Rabbi Aaron Lipskar. Epstein also had a “MyChabad.org” account.

Arguably, Chabad Lubavitch is the most powerful Jewish organization in the world, with branches in cities around the world. The first to bring a case against Epstein, Maria Farmer, revealed in an interview that Epstein and his procurer Ghislaine Maxwell strongly identified as Jewish and preferred to associate with Jews. However, Epstein doesn’t appear to have been a religious man, so his strong identity in Jewishness appears to be more self serving and racial. The piety of many powerful Chabadniks is questionable. It has been said that Chabad is first and foremost a mafia in religious dressing.

This is only scratching the surface, though. Epstein’s co-conspirator (according to Epstein key witness Maria Farmer) U.S. President Donald Trump, like his father before him, is up to his eyeballs in Chabad, whether it’s wheeling and dealing with Chabad’s chief financier “King of Diamonds” Lev Leviev, partnering with Chabad gangster Felix Sater on real estate deals, or declaring Chabad’s false messiah Menachem Mendel Schneerson king. Chabad has bragged that Leviev sent his businesses dealings for approval by the “king” messiah (whom they call “moshaich” in Hebrew) Schneerson.

The DOJ tranche of Epstein emails reveal the pedophile had a MyChabad account and was subscribed to other members of Chabad Lubavitch.

As we begin to see a fuller scope of the disgusting Epstein-Russia-Chabad-Trump affair, things start to make more sense. Statements like “Chabad’s Schneerson ‘actively influenced the ruling elite of the Kremlin’ and ‘contributed to global geopolitical restructuring’: Lugov” don’t seem so far-fetched. There is growing continuity between elements in this saga. We look forward to more revelations from the DOJ release.

Was the Russian Tsar controlled opposition?

Timothy Fitzpatrick — Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:24:39 +0000

By Josh
January 28, 2026 Anno Domini

Here is a new set of information, looking at Tsar Nicholas II with a different perspective. In this research you will notice that Nicholas II was making a lot of questioning decisions which just can’t all be blamed on his ‘incompetence’ or ‘ignorance’.

A lot of the actions taken by Nicholas II were key in making the Bolshevik Revolution happen.

One great example would be him approving of the October Manifesto which led to Freemasonry flourishing in Russia as well as giving Communist Jews political representation in the newly created parliament. His close ties with both Witte and Rasputin is also highly questionable.

Witte has long been proven to be a very corrupt individual who had friendly ties with the same Jewish bankers that wished to see the downfall of Tsarist Russia. Witte was responsible for putting Russia into massive debt to Jewish bankers, yet, Nicholas II thought it was a great idea to allow him to retain his position of Minister of Finance and would later make the first Prime Minister of Russia?

For more in-depth research into the traitor Sergei Witte, check this out.

Another thing that Nicholas II did was to personally intervene to save Jewish communist terrorists from being executed.

“In May 1903, Gershuni was arrested in Kiev. In February 1904, Gershuni was tried by a military court in Saint Petersburg and received a death sentence, which later was reduced to life imprisonment at a hard labour camp by Tsar Nicholas II of Russia.[5] In 1906, he hid in a barrel of sauerkraut and escaped from the Akatuy katorga to China”

para 4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grigory_Gershuni

Gershuni was a terrorist leader of the highly dangerous SR Combat Organization. Gershuni was responsible for the murder of multiple of Nicholas II’s political officials. He made it clear that he wanted to use terrorism to take down Tsarist Russia. Now…why would Nicholas II personally intervene to save him from execution?

Only for him to soon after conveniently escape?

That’s another point: There are too many examples of prominent Jewish communists who get caught, get sentenced to ‘hard labor’ and soon after, they all easily escape.

Stalin himself escaped up to 5 times! How is that even possible? How is he able to escape even once and how was he not executed the second time they caught him?

All of this was happening under Nicholas II’s watch.

More examples:

“On 11 March, Spiridonova was tried and convicted of Luzhenovsky’s murder and sentenced to death. However, the tribunal also asked that the sentence be commuted to penal servitude in Siberia, in view of her ill health. This was approved on 20 March.[10] The liberal press continued its campaign in her support. On 2 April, Avramov was himself assassinated, creating a further sensation.”

para 11 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Spiridonova#Luzhenovsky_assassination

“One morning, a prison guard told Izmailovich that she would be hanged within five days. Although she was not concerned about the death sentence, her sisters hired her a defense lawyer for her court martial. When the lawyer brought her the indictment, she was shocked to discover it named an innocent baker’s assistant as the bomb thrower.[24] Her lawyer advised her to call witnesses of the 18 October events, who could testify about the massacre of peaceful protestors ordered by Kurlov. She compiled a list, but the court refused to permit her any witnesses in her defense. After saying goodbye to her comrade in the room above her, and expressing her love for him, she prepared herself for her death.[25] He told her not to imagine herself to be a second Sophia Perovskaya, as he believed her sentence would be commuted.

After a few minutes of deliberation, the judges found Izmailovich and Pulikhov guilty of the charges of conspiracy to murder and sentenced them to execution by hanging. But following appeals by her sisters, the sentence was commuted to a life sentence of penal labour

paras 11, 13 & 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandra_Izmailovich#Trial

Here’s another Jewish terrorist who was sentenced to death but had her sentence commuted – escaped Siberia TWICE

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariya_Shkolnik

“Sukloff was part of the shesterka, a group of six SR women who were sentenced to Siberia together following attempted murders in 1905–06. All were first sentenced to death and then had their punishment commuted. The shesterka included Sukloff, Spiridonova, Revekka Moiseevna Fialka, Lidiya Pavlovna”

page 200, footnote 91

https://www.proquest.com/openview/c88bafc608b03a54f81dd88743a6c0b3/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

“Spiridonova was sent to Siberia in the company of five other prominent female SR terrorists. The group was sometimes called the Shesterka (“Six”). As a result of the press campaign, Spiridonova was the most famous. She was also young, attractive, and an ethnic Russian (at least four of the others were Jewish, Belarusian, and Ukrainian)”

para 14 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Spiridonova#Exile_to_Siberia

At least two of the six were Jewish, Shkolnik (Sukloff) and Fialka – All of them had their sentenced commuted.

And being that we are talking about SR Combat Organization. It was run by the Jew Yevno Azef, who was the chief of this terrorist group from 1904 to 1908. But he was also an agent of the Tsarist secret police, and he was still an agent throughout all the years he was the leader of the terrorist group. It took a whole 4 years before Azef had to flee. And there we go again, one big Jewish terrorist being allowed to escape justice and manage to flee.

Again, all of this was going on under the watch of Tsar Nicholas II.. and instead of doing something about it.. he continued to add fuel to the fire..

So it makes me wonder…

Was he ever an enemy of the Jews? We know that the Romonovs were big into Freemasonry, at least from the 1700s with (Jew) Peter the Great, and from there, Freemasonry continued to spread its toxic influence all over Russia.

“He (Peter the Great) had a Jewish ancestor, through his mother’s line, a Karaite Jew named Naryshko.”

para 2 harryfreedman.substack.com/p/peter-the-greats-jews

Then we see that Nicholas II was responsible for allowing Freemasonry to become prominent in Russia once again, but this time it was done at a very fast pace. And we know that the lodges that were established as a result of the October Manifesto were responsible for the February Revolution, which paved the way for the Bolshevik Revolution.

With the Duma being established thanks to Tsar Nicholas II and Witte, it was filled with revolutionaries (Jews) who wanted to implement communist reforms in Russia and called for amnesty for political prisoners. It was being used as a political instrument against Tsarist rule. So Nicholas II decided to abolish it. Smart move right?

Only for him to re-establish the Duma again.

There were a total of four dumas; two were abolished, the other two were changed. And each time it was because it was used as a political weapon against the Tsarist government. It was quite clear from the first Duma what its intention was.. so why in the world did Nicholas II think it was a great idea to keep it around? Why abolish it only to put it back again?

Duma became completely filled with Freemasons and Jewish communists, and it was then used to abolish Tsardom. It accomplished what the first Duma had intended to accomplish.. It was made possible because of Nicholas II’s refusal to abolish the Duma permanently.

It’s almost as if the Tsar is collaborating with his supposed enemies to bring down Tsarist Russia itself. Similar to what Assad did.

A prominent Jewish connection to Nicolas II are the immensely powerful Gunzburg family (“The Russian Rothschilds”).

http://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/gunzburgs-halban-russian-rothschilds

They were in direct contact with Tsar Nicholas II’s court & government in a formal capacity

“Thus, we have before us one of the most famous Jewish families in Russia at that time – the family of Baron Gintsburg [Günzburg]. The members of this family not only possessed, as contemporaries believed, “fabulous wealth,” but were, as they are now written in the Russian press, “cult” figures for the vast majority of the Jews of the Russian Empire. Indeed, they had enormous financial wealth & connections with the tsar’s court & international banking capital.

Baron Ginzburg, who built a synagogue in St. Petersburg, ONCE RODE IN A CARRIAGE WITH NICHOLAS II.”

paras 17-18 amhazikaron.org/en/jewish-barons/

Here is Jewish Baron Horace Ginzburg with the hidden hand.

Information on Rasputin:

”Yusupov saw “distinctly Jewish-type” men at Rasputin’s in Petrograd, hence he suspected him of nefarious activities. Father Shavelsky complained to the tsar that Rasputin went out drinking with “Jews and all sorts of dark personalities.” The police recorded a Jewish merchant from Minsk visiting Rasputin in Pokrovskoe and had the man thoroughly investigated. Socializing with Jews was something upper-class Russians typically did not do. It signified bad taste, or something worse.

”From the ugly prejudice of his earlier years, Rasputin grew to accept Jews, as friends and business colleagues, and even to champion liberalized state policies toward Russia’s Jews that put him well ahead of the vast majority of his countrymen. Part of the reason for this was the fact that Russian nationalists had themselves turned away from Rasputin, but just as important was Rasputin’s own personality, his relaxed tolerance toward other nationalities and faiths and his general live-and-let-live nature. The artist Alexander Raevsky recalled during one of his sessions with Rasputin in 1912 how someone in his studio began to curse the Jews. In a flash, Rasputin cut the person off: “That’s not true!” he yelled. “All people are equal before God … Once I traveled from Jerusalem with a Jew. He was a kind man, a pious man. Just as among Christians, so too among them, one finds all kinds of people.”

‘Best remembered of the Jews close to Rasputin was his secretary Aaron Simanovich.”

”He also opened a number of gambling parlors, being himself an inveterate gambler, known to win, and lose, big on high-stakes games at the tables. Reports as to his character diverge wildly. One Okhrana report described him as “quite a nasty man, a powerful string-puller with an insinuating manner, capable of any adventure or speculation.””

”At the time of Rasputin’s murder Simanovich said the two men had met, by coincidence, in 1900 at the railway station in Kazan, and then renewed their acquaintance and began to grow close around 1911.6 Could Simanovich’s gambling addiction have played a role? The Petersburg press reported in 1914 that when the “Capital Arts and Social Club,” the anodyne name behind which one of the city’s larger gambling establishments operated, was on the verge of bankruptcy, Rasputin stepped in to arrange a large loan to keep it afloat. The club, according to the article, was notorious for all sorts of vice and illegality, but this never seemed to bother Rasputin, and although he did not play the tables himself, he liked to come and watch the action”’

Rasputin: Faith, Power, and the Twilight of the Romanovs
Book by Douglas Smith

Check this quote out from the same source as above:

”Simanovich purportedly witnessed Rasputin’s respect for Jews at Gorokhovaya. “If among the petitioners were some generals,” Simanovich recalled, “then he would jokingly say to them: ‘Dear Generals, you are used to always being received first. But there are Jews here, people without any rights, and I should see to them first. Jews, let us talk. I want to do everything for you.’”

The Tsar was fully aware of Rasputin’s close ties to Jews, despite this, he still decided to keep him around in his inner circle. Again, how many times can his blunders be blamed on incompetence…

“That this letter demonstrated Rasputin’s prophetic abilities was reinforced for the Imperial Family when the Empress and her daughters went to work in the military hospital set up in the Catherine Palace and saw the horrors of the Great War for themselves. The hospital, and other charities run by the Empress, were funded by Dmitri Rubenstein, a wealthy Jewish banker and friend of Rasputin’s. This connection, and Rasputin’s increasingly public philosemitism, helped to stir up anti-Rasputin sentiment on the extreme-Right, to join that on the extreme-Left.”

para 12 https://kyleorton.co.uk/2021/12/13/rasputin-and-the-empress/

Rasputin had possible ties to the German Foreign Ministry through Dmitri Rubenstein. And as we know, the German Foreign Ministry was filled with crypto Jewish, advancing the Bolshevik cause.

Max Warburg, Parvus, and also Rasputin’s close buddy, Rubenstein, helped the Bolsheviks get in touch with the Imperial Bank of Germany.

This is a testimony from Alexander A. Khvostov, former prime minister of Imperial Russia, an ultra nationalist, a monarchist and a stark opponent of the Bolsheviks. He was arrested when the Freemasonic Provisional Government took over and was shot dead soon after Bolsheviks took over.

”Question: How did you sense the role of Rasputin?

Khvostov: He was a very convenient means for German espionage. Although I did not catch him in espionage, it logically seemed to me that he was a spy, not a conscious one, but a tool for espionage, because it was very easy to find out through him what was going on in Tsarskoye Selo. Obviously, the Germans are very clever people….It seems to me that he was in the hands of German agents. I tried to catch them, but failed.

There were several suspicious persons around him, but I had no information to act on. I suspected Hartvig [Alexandra Hartvig, a nurse who managed the Empress’s war supply department]: an investigation was being conducted about her, which was later discontinued. She was suspicious. Then there was Dolgorukaya [Princess Olga Dolgorukaya], who lived at the Astoria and behaved suspiciously. She was some adventuress who had bought the title by marrying Prince Dolgoruky. Rasputin visited her…In my testimony on the Rubinstein [Dmitri Rubenstein, involved in multiple businesses, later arrested for his financial corruption] case I set forth in detail the reason why I believed that Rasputin was a spy. I found the following facts. Rubenstein gave Rasputin instructions to go to Tsarskoye Selo to find out about any military offenses that were planned, as Rubenstein said he needed to know in order to buy timber….Rasputin told me that he did as asked and related what he had learned to Rubenstein….Rasputin was extremely contemptuous of the former Emperor’s personality but he very much approved of the former Empress, said that she was clever, that she was Catherine II, and in general praised her terribly.

He treated the former emperor in such a way that the detectives thought it inconvenient for them to write down what he said in their notes. He only referred to him as “Papa.” I heard him say: “I was at Tsarkoye and when I entered Papa was sitting there all sad. I stroked his head and said, ‘Why are you sad?’ He answered, ‘All the scoundrels are around! There are no boots, no guns. We have to advance, but we can’t advance!’…Rasputin asked him for details of the attack….Whether Rubinstein needed this information in order to buy timber, or in order to report to Berlin by radio telegraph…is difficult to establish…”

https://atlantismagazine.substack.com/p/the-1917-interrogation-alexei-nikolaevich

From the same testimony, check this out, the Tsar defended Rubinstein by not providing any support to bring charges against him.

”Khvostov: In the case of Rubinstein’s espionage, Manasevich-Manuilov [Ivan Manasevich-Manuilov, former official in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, arrested for embezzlement but Rasputin arranged for the charges to be dismissed], as an experienced man, could divert any case like an old fox from its hole. It seems to me that this is why the Rubinstein case has not gone to trial….When I had the information against Rubenstein, I made a categorical report to the Emperor. He went to the window, did not want to listen, pretending that he was not interested. I asked him to listen to him. The report was so complete and finally he said, “Do what you want. I believe you.””

”Do what you want”.. I.E.. I am not going to do anything about it myself, and without my support or my inner circles support like Rasputin.. nothing will happen to Rubinstein..”

Are we starting to see a trend of the Tsar defending criminal Jews?

Here is a letter written by an officer in the Imperial Army that laid out very insightful perspective about Nicholas II.

Russian-Jewish oligarch Lev Leviev sent ‘business’ dealings for approval by Chabad’s false messiah Schneerson

Timothy Fitzpatrick — Fri, 19 Sep 2025 17:00:38 +0000

Lev Leviev (left) with the late Lubavitcher Rebbe Menachem Mendel Schneerson. Leviev is known as the “king of diamonds” and is associated with Donald Trump and the Russian-Jewish oligarchs surrounding his rise to power. Leviev is considered the primary financier of Chabad Lubavitch.

By Shie Deich
November 13, 2024

That’s what is transmitted on behalf of Rebbe Maharash. We are used to saying that telling stories about Baal Shem Tov at the end of Shabbat helps to earn money. However, this is a triple mistake: firstly, not only stories about Baal Shem Tov, but also about any righteous people; secondly, not only at the end of the Sabbath, but also on any day of the week; and thirdly – not only for earnings, but also for everything you need!

Nevertheless, many Hasidim tell stories about Baal Shem Tova at the end of Shabbat, and I also try to follow this custom at home. But last Saturday in Kislovodsk I was invited to a meal with Levi Levaev. In a warm Hasidic atmosphere, the heart of this wonderful man opened, and at the “melave malka” meal I asked him: “Tell us about your relationship with Rebe!”

“Once, many decades ago, I got an offer to invest in a small country, the name of which I heard for the first time – the purchase of rough diamonds mined there. The offer was tempting and promising, and my friends strongly recommended me to enter into this deal, from which I was supposed to make a huge profit. I described the details of the transaction and sent a letter to Rebbe.

The answer was amazing: “Check the tfilin”. My tfilins were quite new and of very high quality. But when checking, the scribe still found something that needed to be corrected, and of course, immediately corrected it. I informed the Rebba about it, and received this recommendation: “On the advice of friends”. I consulted with other friends who also recommended this deal. I wrote to Rebbe about it, and Rebe replied again: “On the advice of friends.” Strange! I asked several Hasidim what all this could mean, and they replied: “If the Rebbe answers in this way, it’s probably not worth entering into this deal.” I refused it, and a few weeks later I see a headline in the newspaper: “The coup d’état in the country…” I appreciated the Rebbe’s foresight.

There was another story in those years. They came to me with the idea of buying the rights to a certain TV channel. The project was supposed to bring high profits. Major experts and consultants studied the issue from all sides and recommended the deal. And my attorney, an experienced man, gave the green light. I transferred the cost of my part, which was a large amount, but shortly before signing the detailed contract, I sent the details of the offer to the Rebe. The answer was clear and clear: “No!”

I reported this to the attorney, who was surprised, but took note of the Rebbe’s words and made sure that I got back all the money already transferred. A year passed, and it turned out that the deal was full of problems, and other partners lost all the money they invested. And I stayed with my own – again thanks to the Rebbe.”

Alleged Schneerson speech in spirit of Protocols of Zion: eliminate ethnic Slavs through subversion and warfare, Jewish power based in Russian Crimea

Timothy Fitzpatrick — Thu, 27 Feb 2025 07:32:59 +0000

CHABAD LEADER, FALSE MESSIAH MENACHEM MENDEL SCHNEERSON ON HIS PLANS TO DESTROY SLAVS

This speech [a letter sent to the newspaper] of Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Chabad Leader and so called Messiah (the Lubavitcher Rebbe), was published in the Vologda newspaper “Slavyanin», N-4 (32), 2001 in Russia.

Following the publication, the court was unable to prosecute its editor, V.F. Popov, under trumped up charges under Article 282, [incitement of national hatred] as he operated on the facts, and several Russian scientists stood up for him, including Academician Y. K. Begunov and Doctor of Law O.G. Korotayev.

This speech was uttered by Menachem Mendel Schneerson in 1994. There is much debate about its authenticity, as once argued about the validity of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” but it is an indisputable fact that almost all the goals, laid out by Schneerson, have been achieved by now. This speech is simply the application of Talmud to Ukraine and Russia. Talmud says: Jews should murder and enslave goyim worldwide. This speech says: Jews should murder and enslave goyim in Ukraine and Russia. Yes, the speech by Menachem Mendel Schneerson is monstrous. For a normal person, it is hard to believe that a religious leader can be a MURDERER, and that the religion can be THE IDEOLOGY OF MURDER. That is why, the text of this essay has every criminal passage from the speech next to the criminal passage from Talmud. The face of the Zionist Messiah also speaks for itself: it is the face of a TERRORIST, full of hatred and menace.

1. Our special tactics to combat Slavs is a secret knowledge, because of its exclusivity limited to the god’s chosen people. The main weapon of struggle we will direct against the Slavs, except for renegades, “married” with the Jews by common interests. True, all these “married to us” will be withdrawn from our society once we use them for our own purposes.

Slavs, and among them Russians – are the most unbending people in the world. Slavs are unbending as a result of their psychological and intellectual abilities, created by many generations of ancestors. It is impossible to alter these genes. Slav, Russian, can be destroyed, but never conquered. That is why this seed is subject to liquidation, and, at first, a sharp reduction in their numbers.

2. Our methods of conquest will not at all be military, but ideological and economic, with the use of power structures, armed with the most modern types of armament for the physical suppression of revolt with even greater ferocity than it was done in October 1993 with gunning of the Supreme Council of Soviet Russia.

First of all, we will divide the Slavic nations (of 300 million, half of them Russians) into the small countries with weak and severed connections. For this, we will use our old method: Divide and conquer. We will try to pit these countries against each other, and suck them into civil wars for the sake of mutual destruction.

The Ukrainians would think that they are fighting against the expansionist Russia and struggling for their independence. They will think that they have finally gained their freedom, while they become fully subdued by us.

The same will be thought by Russians, as though they defend their national interests to return their lands, “illegally” taken away from them, and so on.

We will do all of this under the guise of different sovereignties, the struggle for their national ideals. At the same time, we will not give either party any self-determination, based on the national values and traditions.

In this war of fools, the Slavic moronic herd will be weakening itself and strengthening us, the main controllers of the chaos, pretending to stand aside, not only without participating in the bloody events, but also without involvement.

Moreover, we will fully protect ourselves. In the consciousness of the Slavic fools (uninitiated), we will lay such stereotypes of thinking in which the world “anti-Semite” would become the most terrible word. The word “Jew” would be pronounced in a whisper.

We will scare the cattle with several court cases (such as the trial of an anti-Semite Ostashvili, followed by his destruction) and other methods (radio, television – frightening movies, such as revenge of the Israeli Mossad super-spies for killing of Jews). We will frighten the cattle so bad that not a single hair will fall from the head of a Jew, while the Slavs will be shot in packs, destroyed by thousands – on the borders, where the Jews do not serve in peacekeeping forces, via terrorist acts, and via criminal and professional killings [such as the acts of terrorist at Beslan school that took hundreds of lives, in the Moscow subway, and so on].

3. Dumb Slavic people do not realize that the worst fascists are those who never and in no place proclaim fascism aloud, but, instead, organize it all supposedly according to the most democratic standards. On the contrary, we will make the very word “fascist” a dirty word.

Everyone will be scared that we will stick this label to him. We know very well that nationalism strengthens the nation, making it strong. The slogan of “internationalism” is outdated and no longer works as before. We will replace it with the “universal human values”, which is the same thing.

We will not allow any nationalism to evolve. And we will destroy by fire and sword all those nationalist movements that seek to lead people out of our dictate, as it is done in Georgia, Armenia and Serbia. Instead, we will insure the full prosperity of our nationalism – Zionism, and, more precisely: Jewish fascism, which, in its secrecy and power, is super-fascism.

It is not for nothing that in 1975, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution which defined Zionism as the most blatant “form of racism and racial discrimination”, but repealed this resolution in 1992, because of our triumphant march across the planet. We have made UN a weapon for our goals of seizing power over “all kingdoms and nations.”

4. We will deprive the population of Slavs of their national elite, which is the one that determines the development of events and the progress of the country, and, ultimately, the whole course of history. To do this, we will lower their level of education – in the next 5 years, we will close half of their universities, and it is us who will get educated at the other half.

We will allow the Armenians there, Chechens, Gypsies and others. We will work to ensure that the governments of the Slavic countries would contain as little as possible of the indigenous peoples who will be replaced by our Jewish elite.

In the mass media – radio, television, press, art, literature, theater, cinema – we will gradually push out national staff and replace them with our staff or, in extreme cases, the cosmopolitan staff.

We will undertake the reform in education, and limit the teaching of subjects that strengthen and systematize the thought process in the left and the right brain hemispheres: а) Language and Literature, b) Physics and Mathematics.

As for the history, there is nothing to say. We will give our own history to the cattle, and show that the entire human evolution was moving towards the recognition of the God’s chosen nation of Jews to be masters over the entire world.

Instead of national values, we will give you a Balalaika patriotism and drunken tears. Our goal is to replace the Slavic elite with our own elite. We will not allow the development of science in Slavic countries. A core of scientists (Academy of Sciences) will consist of our people.

We will not allow any high-tech industries, and this will lead to a complete collapse of the industry. We will restrict it to the production of essential items for a limited contingent of slaves, producing raw materials to us.

There is a lot of engineers, skilled workers and teachers among the citizens. We will create for them such conditions of survival (no jobs, high rent, high cost of utilities, transportation, etc.) that they will run by themselves to the remote villages in the North, where Russians are now fleeing to from the countries of the former Soviet Union. They would think it could be easier for them to live a better life. But, in reality, this will also be a hoax.

Corrupt the youth and make them perverts – and you win the nation! This is our motto. We will deprive your community of young people, degrading it with sex, rock music, violence, alcohol, smoking, drugs, that is, we will deprive your society of the future. We will strike at the family, destroying it, we will reduce a birth rate.

Hitler was a stupid boy. He acted directly and openly. And it was an extremely hard work to do – to burn, shoot, to bury millions, and the like. He left bloody footprints. We act more cleverly: we will leave no traces. Reduce a birth rate at least by half – and you will be killing 2-3 million Russians a year without any physical effort. There is no need for ovens, ammunition, and graves. And there is no traces left. Not born – no one is guilty.

We will create the conditions for life for criminals better than for working cattle. We will be releasing criminals from prisons, so that there will be more murders, robberies, instability. Amnesty will apply only to thieves and murderers — in short, all but those convicted for “inciting ethnic hatred”, which is, in fact, the law against anti-Semitism.

We will sow fear among people. Cattle will fear for their lives, which will be worth nothing. They will fear for the workplace that could be taken away at any moment. They will fear for the future of their … We shall govern by fear.

5. These grandiose goals will be implemented in several stages. Already 85% of the continental shelf of the Arctic Ocean ended up in our hands, thanks to confusing agreements. signed under Gorbachev and Yeltsin and that are not explained to the people (the general public is not yet aware of it).

Already, half a million Armenians reside in Southern Russia. This is our outpost. At first, for the purpose of deceit, we will declare the Armenian Republic in Kuban. Then, driving away the Cossacks, we will convert it into Khazaria – Israel. What will help us is that the Cossacks are constantly drunk, love power and are ready to fight each other for this power.

However, there is still a structured organization – the Orthodox clergy. We will send there the members of our Jewish clergy, who will become Russian Orthodox Priests. Talmud permits them to perform the rituals of other religions, keeping intact their Judaism deep inside.

We will bribe the rest of them. And we will destroy those who will do not succumb to us. Russians no longer have any more or less organized structures, and cattle cannot unite and establish them, because Russian cattle already became drunkards and got degraded, and is incapable of structuring.

In the last century, the United States purchased Alaska from Russia. In the XXI century, the US will buy the entire Siberia, including the Siberian territory between the Yenisei river to the West and the Pacific Ocean in the East and the border of China, between the Arctic Ocean in the North and Mongolia and North Korea in the south. These lands are two times higher than the territory of the United States. Acre of land will be purchased for as low as $1,000, and for the entire Siberia, the US will pay $3 trillion over 20 years. Annual payments will be $200 million, half of which will be spent on the purchase of goods in the United States .

Siberians would have to submit to s foreign influence, while the US looks nicer than the Asian neighbors. In the end, Vladivostok is closer to Los Angeles than to Moscow …

6. For all these activities paramount for us, we will give monarchy to Slavic cattle under the guise of “democratic transition”. Everyone in the herd will get a puppet president. And the more glitter, noise, pump, the better! Monarchy is good in that sense that it directs all the energy of the masses into the whistle. Monarch will detract attention of the herd from our secret active work on the structuring of the population according to the system, necessary to us. President is a screen, seemingly elected by a popular vote (and we will forge electoral procedures in such a way that they will seem so that everything would seem legitimate), and we are going to do all our necessary business from behind this screen. The President will be endowed with unlimited powers. Through changes in the top ranks of security agencies, this president will appoint our people to the posts in the security agencies. Army, all the national security agencies, and all sorts of special forces will be directly subordinate to the president. And that means that they will be subordinate to us. We will have in our hands only the strings attached to the hands of the president. And we’ll pull these strings in such a way as it is necessary to the implementation of our grandiose plan of conquering all the tribes and kingdoms, their subordination to our superior nation, chosen by God of Israel.

7. But money is most important. Money does everything. Money is power. Money is force. The man with money has weapons, most advanced weapons, and the army of mercenaries. Money owns media, which is fooling the billions of human cattle. Money bribes the people we need. Money eliminates those who do not submit to us. Money bombs those resisting us – Iraqis, Serbs, and, in the future – Russians. Capital and taking power decide everything. We practice our skills in the accumulation of capital and the seizure of power for more than three millennia, and no one will defeat us in this. You [cattle] do not have money. You [cattle] do not have power. And you [cattle] will not ever have money and power. We will not give money and power to you!

We hate you immensely! This hatred gives us strength to smile charmingly in your face. Our hatred gives us strength to win your trust and control you [cattle] under the guise of “care” about you and your children, grandchildren and your great grandchildren who would never be born.

You (herd) are doomed. And until you understand this simple truth, as long as you continue resisting us, you will be beaten more than it is due. If you obey us, there will be 65 – 70 million of you left, otherwise – 40-45 mln.

The main thing for us now is to hold on for at least another 2-3 years. After that, there will be no problems for us in this country (Ukraine and Russia). We will create such protective means that none of you will be able to oppose us. We know and secretly control all that will be. And no one can stop us!

8. World reserves of industrial raw materials are depleted, and by the beginning of the next millennium, “Western society” will not be able to retain its current level of consumption without replenishment from new sources – the colonial countries-donors. Therefore, our aspirations are directed at Russia now with the dual purpose: first – the elimination of the most powerful and independent empire, which occupies one-sixth of the earth. The second is the acquisition of its wealth, which constitute 60-70% of total world reserves of raw materials and 75-80% of open world’s oil and gas reserves that are concentrated in Siberia and the continental shelf of the Arctic Ocean.

9. The planet is under intense global warming. The desert is moving northward at a speed of 10 km. per year, dewatering of land is 25 m per year. Already today the ancient centers of the world – Athens, Rome and, most importantly, Jerusalem (Israel) are in a zone of artificial irrigation. In 20 – 30 years, we will have to think about the relocation of the vast masses of civilized nations to the north of their current residence. By that time, the Kuban, in the Rostov region, and Ukraine will have wonderful sub-tropical climate, and the north of Ukraine will have the climate of Caucasus.

Looking back in history, it must be admitted that these lands are the ancient ancestral lands of the Jewish Khazaria, that is Israel, captured by Kiev’s Rus’ (the ancient state of Russia with the capital in Kiev) in the tenth century. The Slavs are temporary guests on these lands and are subject to eviction. We will return this territory, and build the Great Khazaria – the Jewish state –on these fertile lands the same way as, 50 years ago, we created Israel, squeezing the Palestinians out. Israelis will partially relocate here, and we will drive Slavic cattle out far to the north, beyond Moscow. There will be a small Northern Territory, a reservation with a compact population — a reservation, like Indian reservations in America.

Source

‘Russia will become the capital of Kabbalah…Marxism-Leninism prepared us for Kabbalah’: rabbi Michael Laitman

Timothy Fitzpatrick — Fri, 23 Feb 2024 05:54:31 +0000

Rabbi Michael Laitman at the United Nations. Laitman sits on the openly Kabbalist World Wisdom Council, which was once chaired by the late Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev. “Only the Kabbalah can save the world,” says Laitman.

By Iz.ru
February 24, 2003 Anno Domini

Kabbalah is one of the most mysterious magical teachings. There are many legends about ancient Kabbalah. The head of the world school of Kabbalists, Michael Laitman, arrived in Moscow, who is a student of Baruch Ashlag, the son of the most famous Kabbalist of the twentieth century, Judah Ashlag, known as Baal HaSulam. Kabbalists believe that it was Baal HaSulam who was inhabited by the soul that lived first in Moses and then in Abraham. You can guess who the soul of the Old Testament prophets resides in now. Rabbi Laitman is the heir to a chain of famous Kabbalists of the past, and now he is the only one who is allowed to teach publicly

A person wants to live happily. This is perhaps the first law of life. And the second – a person is afraid of loneliness. But how to fulfill these aspirations? The first way is to change the environment for the better and find a creature close in spirit and mind. The second is to change yourself for the better and again get away from loneliness. As in economics – an extensive path and an intensive one. Civilization has come up with countless routes to follow these paths. Like a vinaigrette, a person, in pursuit of the blue bird of happiness, mixes all possible methods – rational and irrational, earthly and astral, majestic and funny. You can, for example, organize an interplanetary dating club and directly contact your brothers in mind, who, you believe, will relieve you of oppressive loneliness. This is what Ukrainian astronomers did, calling on colleagues from other countries as companions. You can do otherwise – try to improve yourself to such an extent that your spiritual virtues will allow you to become equal to His Majesty the Creator. This recipe is professed by Kabbalists who study the ancient and secret Kabbalah. Has a person come even one iota closer to happiness, has he escaped loneliness? As the great sage Kant said, there are two things inaccessible to understanding: the starry sky above us and the moral law within us. Our today’s page is about these eternal mysteries.

Kabbalah is one of the most mysterious magical teachings. There are many legends about ancient Kabbalah. Where is the truth and where is the speculation? The head of the world school of Kabbalists, Michael Laitman, arrived in Moscow, who is a student of Baruch Ashlag, the son of the most famous Kabbalist of the twentieth century, Judah Ashlag, known as Baal HaSulam. Kabbalists believe that it was Baal HaSulam who was inhabited by the soul that lived first in Moses and then in Abraham. You can guess who the soul of the Old Testament prophets resides in now. Rabbi Laitman is the heir to a chain of famous Kabbalists of the past, and now he is the only one who is allowed to teach publicly. In Moscow, he gave a lecture at the Russian State Library. The night before the lecture, Rabbi Michael LIGHTMAN spoke with Izvestia columnist Sergei LESKOV. – If you, Rav Laitman, had to give a brief definition of Kabbalah, how would you formulate it? – Was this definition in the Great Soviet Encyclopedia? – Was. There was no chapter about love, but there was one about Kabbalah. – Some kind of stupidity.

Kabbalah is a method of revealing the complete universe to man. Man has five senses, but there is a volume of the universe that is hidden from him. And Kabbalah reveals this volume. This is a purely practical method, accessible to everyone. Although it is very difficult – you have to go through 125 steps. When a Kabbalist enters into a sense of the higher world, ordinary ideas about time and space disappear. The world appears in its entirety of cause-and-effect relationships. A person at another level of existence acquires qualities that allow him to see what is beneficial and what is harmful. The border between life and death disappears, and a person begins to identify himself with eternity. – Do such abilities imply special morality? – We are not talking about this category. Can a technique have morality? It’s just that a person has a new sense organ, which takes him to a different level of perception of the universe. – What about all sorts of Tarot cards, cryptograms, manipulations with numbers? – Nonsense and fairy tales! Kabbalah is the science of the sixth sense organ.

I could say that this is the science of the soul, if everyone did not put their own meaning into the concept of “soul”. – Such outstanding personalities as Jan Potocki, Borges, Thornton Wilder wrote about Kabbalah. Is there truth in their writings? – I haven’t read any of this, although I’ve heard it. I only read books by Kabbalists. – If Kabbalah is a science, then it must have strict signs of science – repeatability of the result, its predictability, changes in methodology when new knowledge is accumulated. – The Kabbalist records his condition in strict quantitative parameters. Kabbalah textbooks contain diagrams, tables, formulas. Following the calculated path, the Kabbalist comes to the desired point, where another Kabbalist will come in the same way. It’s like a city guide. – Last year, at the Russian Philosophical Society, which operates within the Academy of Sciences, a section on the theory and history of Kabbalah was created, and the first dissertation in Russia on this issue was defended. But for well-known reasons, scientists have a cautious, distrustful attitude towards philosophy. – The fundamental achievements of natural science coincide with what was written many centuries ago in books on Kabbalah. Physicists repeat what the Kabbalists have revealed in the spiritual world. This applies, for example, to the origin of the Universe due to the Big Bang. In Kabbalah there was never any doubt about the heliocentric system of the world.

The books of Ari, written in the 16th century, give a detailed description of human anatomy, the cardiovascular system, and talk about the importance of bone marrow. The number 137 itself, one of the fundamental constants of the Universe (Planck’s constant multiplied by the speed of light divided by the square of the electron charge), is the encrypted meaning of the word “Kabbalah.” – But if Kabbalah knows everything, then can’t it help science? – For what? – So that scientists don’t suffer. And so that a person can quickly take advantage of the fruits of the teaching. – It’s not clear that progress will add happiness. The Kabbalist Baal HaSulam burned most of his books so that his students themselves would reach the truths they needed. – Where the soul is, there is God. I don’t want to have conversations on the bench about breakfasts with Kant and proofs of the existence of God, but… – I prefer not to talk about the Creator for the same reason that I avoid mentioning the soul. The Creator is nothing more than the general law of the entire universe. – How are your relations with world religions? – Jewish Orthodox are persecuting us. Kabbalah is hostile to any religion because it deprives it of a piece of bread.

In Kabbalah you don’t have to believe in anything. You just need to ask one childish question – what is the meaning of life? – Kabbalah has always been a closed area. But you, Rav Laitman, give lectures and have a website on the Internet. Has something changed in the world? How many Kabbalists are there now? – Many books say that at the end of the twentieth century, the development of the world will reach such a height that people will strive to understand the meaning of life. Not all people, of course, but a critical mass will arise. And we see how people’s aspirations are changing. There are several levels for a person. The first is food, sex, family. The second is wealth and money. The third is honor and glory. The fourth is knowledge. It was only in the twentieth century that a massive desire to understand the meaning of life appeared. The time has come to reveal Kabbalah to the world, which is the search for the meaning of life. Previously, people were not ready for this, and Kabbalah was the lot of the chosen few. And now in the USA about 12 thousand people practice Kabbalah, in Israel – 3 thousand. The East is completely immune to Kabbalah. – What is the social status of Kabbalists? Are they rich or poor? – Among my students there are both billionaires and unemployed people. What does the contents of a wallet matter if the soul equally feels empty?- What about Russia’s place? Russia always has a special place. Moreover, we are talking about the soul. – Russia has been assigned a central role. In this country, unlike the frozen West, spirituality has always played a special role. The sensual fullness of the Russian person makes him inclined to comprehend Kabbalah. The structure of the Russian soul is such that here it is easy for teaching to find the right response. I think it may be that Russia will attract high society and abundance will arise here, excellent relations will develop between people. – It’s nice, but still Kabbalah is a Jewish teaching. – Who are the Jews? There is no such nation. Genetically they are no different from other peoples. The Jews are the group that was chosen to preserve knowledge until the time came to reveal it to the world. The ancient books precisely indicate 1975, when you can start studying, as the Kabbalist Gaon from Vilna wrote, for example, in the 16th century.

Since we are about to become Kabbalists, it is interesting to know whether this teaching imposes any restrictions? – None. Not in food, not in clothes, not in lifestyle. The main thing is to have fun. Pleasure – the central category of Kabbalah is achieved in merging with nature and the universe. But if pleasure is associated with the satisfaction of only one’s own desires, then it is quickly exhausted. Egoism is hostile to itself and meaningless. It is necessary to divide pleasure and the desire for it in time and space. That is, we must strive for the pleasure of another person. This is the state of the Creator, his highest pleasure is not in receiving, but in bestowing. – Why are we born egoists? The creator could have immediately made something better. – That is, create yourself? Man must independently come to the highest law. This is the purpose of the Creator. – Apparently, he also suffers from loneliness.

At what age can you learn Kabbalah? – You can start learning as soon as a person begins to ask himself the question: “Why am I living?” That is, at any age. – Do men and women perceive Kabbalah differently? – Men are more inclined to give, women – to receive. Therefore, the teaching methods are different. The most enlightened Kabbalists are necessarily men. – A Kabbalist, like a monk, should not think about women? – Why? On the contrary, the Kabbalist radiates so much energy that he begins to attract people. The Kabbalist, like an eternal boy, stops aging; he longs to know everything in this world in order to better understand the Upper World. The Kabbalist becomes a more active person. – Does this activity also concern women Kabbalists? – Don’t know. In this regard, a woman does not have physical needs, but more spiritual ones.

If a Kabbalist becomes wiser, does this help him achieve conventional success? He can, for example, become a consultant to the oligarchs… – That is, “let’s do something”? Hardly. Kabbalah takes you to the higher world, lifts you above the desires that lead to ordinary success in life. When you think about your soul, you inevitably begin to worry less about money. I always warn my billionaire students not to forget about business and surround themselves with dedicated helpers. Kabbalah, perhaps, can only have a utilitarian meaning in raising children and in art. For example, Madonna is actively involved in Kabbalah.

Kabbalists understand the upper world, but how do they relate to the real world? Are they trying to turn it over? – The Kabbalist is loyal to the authorities and leads an ordinary life. But to some extent, he cannot help but lose interest in the real world, which no longer has the same value. – Do you have children? – Three. The son lives in Canada. One daughter in Israel is writing a dissertation in biology. The youngest serves in the army. -Are you afraid of war? Wars in the real world… – Man is ready for self-destruction. I believe that only Kabbalah can save the world. Nothing else, this is already clear, can save the world. Marxism-Leninism prepared us for Kabbalah, Corresponding Member of the RAS Piama GAIDENKO: In the 16th century, during the Renaissance, interest in Kabbalah suddenly arose, many books were translated into European languages, and they were read in society. Are there any parallels with today?

Historians and sociologists should think about this. In principle, a person can become better through occult knowledge. Why not? It seems to me that today the rise of interest in secret teachings is natural: when the previous firm guidelines are lost and a person does not know who he is, where he comes from and where he is going, the search for support outside the rational field begins. In a traditional society with a solid, established way of life, occult knowledge usually does not spread. In the era of the triumph of Marxism-Leninism, occult knowledge was persecuted, people were brought up in the spirit of worship of rational knowledge. Although, you must agree, Marxism-Leninism itself is difficult to classify as rational knowledge. In short, in all areas in Russia the ground for Kabbalah is well prepared. Doctor of Philosophy Evgeny Balagushkin: Kabbalists should have come to Russia.Traditional religious movements are increasingly less consistent with the psychology of modern man. They are built on the fundamental gap between Heaven and Earth, on the assertion that Man is a fallen being and must subdue his desires. But modern man in real life sees his power, he believes in his own strength and does not understand why he must refuse what Nature has given him and deliberately put himself in a downtrodden, dependent position. He cannot understand why his body created by God is sinful and only his soul is capable of carrying the highest meaning. Hence many of the neuroses and complexes of our contemporary people.

In the sacred space, modern man is looking for a teaching that will allow him to feel like a collaborator, an ally of the Creator. The following construction is becoming more and more common: God cries alone, and only relying on the help of Man can they together, God and Man, save the world. The rapprochement of Earth and Heaven, Man and God – this line genetically leads to atheism. By the way, Bolshevism with its leader is one of the latest manifestations of secular religiosity. In Russia, the hunger for God is felt especially acutely. Look how many Western preachers have appeared in the Russian provinces! And Kabbalah, which hundreds of thousands of people practice in the United States, can certainly spread even more widely here. In the ideas of Kabbalah, with its sacralization of hedonistic happiness, one can find much in common with what Plato expressed, and he was, you see, not the last thinker. Kabbalah, among other things, is attractive to modern man because it does not burden him with the burden of sinfulness. This, it seems to me, makes Kabbalah similar to Buddhism and Krishnaism. Is this why Kabbalah cannot find its niche in the East? Kabbalah (in Hebrew – tradition) is part of Jewish theology, the doctrine of the knowledge of God.

It is believed that God imparted Kabbalah to Moses during the last 40 days of their meetings on Mount Sinai. Kabbalah means secret traditions, or unwritten law, and, according to the ancient rabbis, was transmitted to man so that he could understand the universe around him and the universe within him (as writes occult scholar Manly Hall). Those who have penetrated into Kabbalah are believed to discover a logical and comprehensive doctrine of the world order and master methods of influencing Nature. Kabbalah came to Europe in the 13th century thanks to Spanish Jews. It became especially widespread among Christians during the Renaissance. The influence of Kabbalah was felt by Agrippa, Paracelsus, Hegel, V. Solovyov, Berdyaev, Jung, Buber. Like any mystical teaching, it contains intellectual and ritual components. Kabbalah is considered the key to the later Masonic esotericism.

All four of Jeffrey Epstein’s grandparents were Russian emigres, flocking to KGB hotspots in the U.S.

Timothy Fitzpatrick — Sun, 07 Jan 2024 05:11:07 +0000

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
January 6, 2024 Anno Domini

The late financier-turned pimp for teen girls Jeffrey Epstein has connections to KGB, mainly through his handler Robert Maxwell, but perhaps this connections runs deeper we thought.

Epstein’s grandparents are all Russian-born.

His father Seymour’s parents, Julius and Bessie Epstein, were both born in Russia. Likewise, so were his mother Paula’s parents, Max Stolofsky, and Lena Stolofsky.

Members of the two families settled mainly in New York and Florida—two of the known hotspots for the presence of the dreaded Russian Mafiya, which is a conduit for the KGB.

“As Oleg Kalugin, former head of counterintelligence for the KGB, told me, in effect, ‘the Mafia is one of the branches of the Russian government today’,” wrote Craig Unger in House of Trump House of Putin.

A view of the ‘Trump Village’ in Brighton Beach, New York, USA, 16 January 2016. The residential complex was originally built by real estate investor Fred Trump, father of republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. (Getty Images)

Epstein’s friend and partner in crime Donald Trump is quite familiar with the Soviet Jewish enclave in New York known as Brighton Beach (southern Brooklyn). Father Fred Trump’s “Trump Village” still stands in Brighton Beach today. Fred was a benefactor to the most powerful Jewish organization in the world known as Chabad Lubavitch, which itself was born in Russia but also has a large presence in Brighton Beach and Florida. Trump’s KGB-Mogilvech-connected crime partner Felix Sater was honoured by Chabad Lubavitch of Port Washington. You’ll remember that Sater helped Trump and his Russian-Jewish oligarchs launder their money and live in Trump-owned real estate in Florida and New York, among places.

Epstein’s grandparents came to the United States when many other Eastern European/Soviet Jews filing into North America (the powerful Bronfman and Lansky families comes to mind).

“According to Oleg Kalugin…at least two hundred Jews from Leningrad (now St. Petersburg) alone went ot the U.S., and many of them promised to report back to the KGB once they were settled. The KGB’s goal was to place them in sensitive positions in the American government or the military industrial complex…’Brighton Beach was on of the places I would look for potential sources of information,’ Kalugin told me”, wrote Unger.

CHABAD DOMINANCE IN PALM BEACH—Epstein and Trump were in safe company down in Florida.

(By the way, Kaulgin has publicly stated his belief that Russian President Vladimir Putin is a pedophile. Another KGB defector, Alexander Litvinenko, went so far as to say that the KGB had compromising material on Putin buggering young boys. Yet many conservatives find it hard to believe that Trump was compromised by the Russians—perhaps at the hands of Robert Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.)

Jeffrey Epstein’s parents died in Palm Beach, where the elite pimp carried out his operation just blocks away from Donald Trump’s Mar-A-Lago and blocks away from several Chabad outposts. Although major political changes happened after the Epstein and Stolofsky clans left Russia, it seems likely that they maintained connections with it, at the very least through the Jewish communist and perhaps even Chabad Lubavitch. Epstein and his parents are buried together at the IJ Morris Star of David Cemetery of the Palm Beaches, where some Chabadniks are buried.

Who else has Russian-Jewish parents? None other than Les Wexner, head of the elitist Mega Group, among other things. Wexner’s father was born in Russia while his mother, Bella Cabakoff, was born in Brooklyn, New York, not far from the headquarters of Chabad, which is located in Crown Heights (central Brooklyn). Maria Farmer, the first Epstein victim to come forward to authorities all the way back in 1996, claimed that Les Wexner was the “head of the snake” of the Epstein network.

It’s interesting that a Florida-based police officer involved in investigating Jeffrey Epstein ended up fleeing and taking up citizenship in Russia, but more on that in the next installment of the Trump Controlled By KGB/Mossad series.

Eugene Jones, Opus Dei, and the Vladivostok Mission

Timothy Fitzpatrick — Sun, 17 Sep 2023 01:08:50 +0000

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Sept. 16, 2023 Anno Domini

A couple of months ago, a 79-year-old FBI double agent and American traitor was found dead in his prison cell of 21 years.

Robert Hannsen, a devotee of a powerful pseudo conservative cult inside the Catholic Church known as Opus Dei, had ended up in his daily 23-hour solitary confinement by betraying his country for a bag of silver from the KGB. He betrayed the FBI and also his Catholic wife, not only by leading a double life as a KGB spy but also by allowing his friend to watch him and his wife having sex.[i]

Ironically, the traitor had been known to accuse the Russians of being Godless, though he was serving their interests. Supposedly, this Godlessness is what provoked the Opus Dei to eventually set up shop in the “former” Soviet Union some five years after Hanssen initially was imprisoned. The corrupt KGB-installed Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill, agent “Mikhailov”, was more than happy to welcome to new “Catholic” outreach, which set up the Opus Dei Centre in Moscow on June 26, 2007.

“The vice president of the Department of Foreign Ecclesial Affairs of the Patriarchate of Moscow, Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin, welcomed the personal prelature of Opus Dei, which recently opened a community in Russia, and said its energy and fidelity ‘to Christian ideals are worthy of great respect’… The vicar for Opus Dei in Moscow, Father Jose Antonio Senovilla Garcia, said his community has gone to Russia ‘to encourage the people to be good orthodox believers, to find God in their daily lives and to help others’.”[ii]

Eugene Michael Jones and Aleksandr Dugin at one of many Soviet-sponsored Eurasianist conferences.

If the Moscow Patriarchate is OK with the Dei’s presence in Russia, then so is the Kremlin, then so is the KGB, then so is the Communist International (COMINTERN); meanwhile, authentic Catholic teaching is considered hostile to the Eurasian-oriented crypto Soviet state.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s “brain” and prophet Aleksandr Dugin, a middle aged occultist managing controlled opposition “conservatives” in Western nations has admitted the real neo-Soviet and fiercely anti-Catholic views of the Kremlin and the Communist International. However, these admissions can only be found on Russian language sites.

“Destroy Catholicism from within, strengthen Freemasonry.[iii] Both they (New World Order) and we (Eurasians) want to deprive you of your Catholicism; Orthodoxy…is much closer to what we call paganism.[iv] I think the best thing in Polish history is the Jewish tradition in small towns in eastern Poland. Actually, I am interested in everything that was anti-Catholic in Poland: Polish freemasons and occultists, Jan Potocki and Hoene-Wroński, Mienżyński and Dzerzhinsky … They all chose the Eurasian path.[v]”

If Dugin’s views on Catholicism are an indication of the Kremlin’s, then we can be certain that the neo-Soviet state’s permission of Catholic churches in its country are for show and are closely monitored for compliance with the state agenda—as it is also with the Russian Orthodox Church and all other religions, especially Islam.

Before Opus Dei officially entered Russia, all the way back in 1991—the year the Soviets successfully fooled the world that Soviet Communism had collapsed, one Father Myron Effing of Evansville, Indiana (E. Michael Jones’ home state) had brought his Catholic mission to the Red Empire but on the opposite end of the country in the geopolitically significant city of Vladivostok. It shares borders with China, Japan, and North Korea. Although Effing’s Vlad mission (Mary Mother of God Mission Society) doesn’t overtly claim affiliation with the cult, Opus Dei made a rather interesting prediction in 2011.

“…but it is for God first of all, who has brought us to that beloved country, Russia, through St Josemaria’s prayers. How much he prayed for your country, how much he prayed for you! In union with his regard, I am sure we will reach from St Petersburgh to Vladivostok, doing a wonderful apostolate which will bring forth not only Numerary Assistants but Numeraries, Associates, and Supernumeraries, lots of them….”[vi]

Why does Opus Dei consider Russia beloved? Most of its authentic Christians were murdered off during the Red Terror.

Fr. Myron Effing in Vladivostok, Russia.

In a November 1, 2012 newsletter put out by Effing and his Vlad Mission, a reference was made to Opus Dei which may suggest an affiliation. During the mission’s 16^th annual Far Eastern Catholic Youth Conference, Effing describes an activity where participants were to choose a saint to study and promote for a week.

“The ‘green’ group got St. Josemaria Escriva, the founder of Opus Dei”.[vii]

Effing joins the modernists in their declaration for both Escriva and Pope John Paul II as saints. This isn’t really surprising when you consider that Effing utilizes the highly popular Protestant “Alpha Course” in his mission. Is he an ecumenist in the spirit of Vatican II or is the Alpha covertly Catholic somehow?

Father Effing happens to have as a member of his Vlad Mission the daughter-in-law of pro-Kremlin author and Culture Wars editor Eugene Michael Jones of South Bend Indiana (an Opus Dei centre). Anna Gafurova Jones was the Mission’s first parish organist and choir director. Her mother, Ludmilla Rakhmanova, is a charter member of the mission’s choir and serves as professor of dramatics at The Far Eastern Art Institute in Vladivostok.

“Ludmilla is the director of all operas produced in Vladivostok, a position in which she has worked at one time or another with most of the classical musicians in the Russian Far East….”

It’s unclear how one of E. Michael Jones’ sons would’ve met a Russka from Russia’s far East. But it seems fitting that such a thing should happen given Jones’ unwavering support for the Kremlin and its neo-Soviet satellites, especially Iran, whom Jones can’t seem to love and promote enough.

Although Russia pretends that it has dropped Communism—something which Father Effing seems to believe or at least echo, it maintains strict control over academia, religion, and especially Western influence. It’s difficult to imagine all Catholic Churches in Russia operating without state approval. “So long as no one ventures off the path we have laid out, you may have a presence here,” it seems. This is how it is in Red China, where the state even appoints its own “Catholic” bishops without consent from the Vatican. Catholic presence in Russia helps create the illusion that it is an open society and has, indeed, parted with its Soviet ways. More importantly, perhaps, is that it allows the neo-Soviets easier access to the Church and a means by which to spread its errors right into the heart of the Church and in Catholic nations.

If Catholic presence in Russia is strictly controlled by the crypto-Soviet regime, then what does that say of Opus Dei’s presence there?

The Opus Dei coat of arms: the cross of the Christ within a circle symbolizing the Earth and the rose which the Opus Dei founder found in the Pyrenees in 1937 as he was asking God to send him a tangible sign so as to reassure him on the soundness of his choices.The coat of arms is situated at the Opus Dei international headquarters, Villa Tevere, Rome, an architectural grouping designed by Opus Dei founder Josemaria Escriva de Balaguer where the Prelate’s councellors reside and where Echevarria’s two predecessors are buried, Escriva de Balaguer and Alvaro del Portillo. (Photo by Eric VANDEVILLE/Gamma-Rapho via Getty Images)

According to a mysterious book called Opus Judei published in Colombia in 2000, Opus Dei is a subversive Judeo-masonic organization bent on destroying the Catholic Church from within.[viii] This incredible book seems to be legitimate, as it provides many details which only an insider would seem to have and comes to logical conclusions (to corroborate its conclusions, see my dossier on Opus Dei). If you haven’t seen my dossier on E. Michael Jones, which suggests that he is chasing the same Judeo-masonic-Bolshevist goals as Opus Dei, please browse through it. While Opus Dei uses the front as a traditional, conservative Catholic organization, Jones uses the front of anti-Judaism. However, when you dissect the Jones character enough, you realize that he is actually only anti-Zionist and doesn’t seem to oppose the Kabbalistic and perennialist elements of the Christ-denying cult. He seems to be using anti-Judaism to appeal to his traditional Catholic audience so that he can then secretly inject his Marxist, Russia-is-the-saviour poison into them. Incidentally, Jones is a favourite among the schismatic Eastern Orthodox, like with Estonian Monk Seraphim. Iranian convert to Eastern Orthodoxy Roosh V (Daryush Valizadeh) credits Jones with his conversion. Strange that a so called traditional Catholic is inspiring others to convert to Eastern Orthodoxy—the dominant church in the “former” Communist countries of Eastern Europe and Russia.

Jones has publicly denied being a member of Opus Dei; however, according to the above mentioned Opus Judei book, members—much like Freemasons—tend to obfuscate their membership in order to deceive the public.

“Lieutenant General Fernando Rodrigo Cifuentes made the following statements when referring to Opus Dei: ‘As a military man, I consider the high commitments that the military man has contracted with the nation to be totally in conflict with any other commitments that are undoubtedly contracted by accepting the regulations of a secret association, since its work of recruitment and action is secret.’ (35) Colonel Antonio Sánchez Cámara said: ‘Many, many members of Opus Dei, if asked directly, deny their membership. Opus Dei is something closed, and I like open spaces.’”[ix]

Jones’ publishing company, Fidelity Press, shares some suspicious characteristics with Opus Dei. As it happens, “fidelity” is a significant word in the Opus Dei cult.

“After proselytism and recruitment, come the VOWS, which at first are taken for one year and renewed for five—the so-called “Oblation”; the next step is the juridical incorporation into the Work, which is called “Fidelity”—the culmination of the process of depersonalization.”[x]

On top of that, Jones has as his logo for his Fidelity Press an encircled cross with what appears to be a rose emerging from behind it. This is exactly the Opus Dei’s main symbol. The Opus Judei author claims the rose and empty cross (as opposed to a proper Catholic crucifix) are Kabbalistic in meaning (perhaps also Rosicrucian in origin?).

“The symbol of the rose is a very important part of the Hebrew Kabbalistic tradition. (99) Already in the psalms and in the Jewish prophetic poems, the red rose and the white rose personify the punished and purified bodies of Israel. But in the Kabbalah it goes even further on the path of meanings. The Tree, sephirotic, divided into three vertical columns, has the central one precisely under the invocation of the rose, which in this way restores and balances the rigorous and severe part of creation -left- with its clement and merciful side -right-.”[xi]

“The members of Opus Dei carry, in their pockets, crosses without the body of Christ. Of the crucified Son of God, the Work accepts and recognizes as its own only an empty wooden cross. The camouflaged reasons given by Escrivá are that the naked bodies of Jesus Christ are usually badly made and repugnant. The crucifix is the symbol of faith. The wood, the Calvary where the Jews exercised their deicide.

It is a custom and compulsory rule that in every center or house of Opus Dei “there is a black cross without Christ, which will be decorated twice a year. (102) These heterodox practices have been censured as well as their secrecy, as their thumb is placed on their lips.

If to the bare cross we add the rose we have the rose-cross. Kabbalistic alchemy could not be more explicit and perfect.”[xii]

(These are just some of Jones’ connections to Opus Judei. See more in Randy Engel’s article All the men behind the Opus Dei curtain.)

One might conclude from Engel’s article that both Michael Voris of Church Militant (also pro-Kremlin) and Eugene Michael Jones of Fidelity Press couldn’t possibly both be Opus Dei members since they are feuding with each other over Jones supposedly breaking the confessional seal by exposing Voris’ homosexual past. Again, we turn to Opus Judei for a possible answer.

“Judas the Iscariot has gone down in history not because of his possible virtues as an apostle of Jesus Christ, but because of the secret denunciation he made of his Master that led to the arrest of the Messiah. In such a compact and hermetic circle as Opus Dei is, everyone wants to be an informer, a public and private accuser, a snitch, a confidant of their own closest brothers and sisters. There are various reasons for this, including the fact that informing on the truth in Opus Dei is a practice and a “virtue” so that the followers always live in an atmosphere of mutual and reciprocal distrust, fear, insecurity and isolation, all of which are extremely important for keeping the sect member in chains, in a permanent manner.

Opus Dei pays careful attention to what it calls constant and persistent spiritual direction, which binds and marks each and every one of its members. This is complemented, on a weekly basis, by what it calls “sharing of confidences”, which helps to configure a rigid hierarchical-spiritual order.

On the other hand, the denunciation of the brother by the brother, the embarrassment and shame of being singled out by one’s nearest neighbor, is a rule and an obligation laid down in the statutes and regulations of the Work itself. It is a common and habitual practice, fomented, encouraged and praised by those in charge of the organization.

…

But if sharing of confidences can be disturbing, no less so is public denouncement, the evidence in which they must also, weekly, leave each other, like Judas, but in this case the reward is not thirty denarii of silver, but holiness and heaven in eternity. Public accusation and repression is an unavoidable and inexcusable duty, as laid down in the very Constitutions of Opus Dei which, in article 270, stipulates that ‘The numerary members and the Oblates will meet every week for the brief circle where defects are corrected, where the means of apostolate are proposed and where everything that can guide our spirit and our specific action is dealt with in a familiar way’. Every member must submit or be called to order.”[xiii]

During his time with the FBI and as an Opus Dei member, traitor Robert Hannsen spent time in Gary, Indiana and Chicago, Illinois—just a stone’s throw from Eugene Michael Jones in South Bend. Because the mid-West is a hotbed of Opus Dei activity, one wonders if these two characters ever crossed paths while shilling for the Kremlin and possibly working for Opus Dei.

Notes:

[i] Leonard, Tom, The sordid truth of FBI mole Robert Hanssen’s private perversions… how the Soviet spy let a friend secretly watch him and his wife having SEX – all while he was betraying his country, Daily Mail, June 7, 2023 – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12170269/How-Soviet-spy-FBI-agent-Robert-Hanssen-invited-friend-watch-wife-having-SEX.html

[ii] Catholic News Agency, Patriarchate of Moscow welcomes Opus Dei presence in Russia, Dec. 18, 2007 – https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/11307/patriarchate-of-moscow-welcomes-opus-dei-presence-in-russia

[iii] Radio Spada, Reflections on some words by A. Dugin, April 19, 2023 – https://www.radiospada.org/2023/04/distruggere-il-cattolicesimo-dallinterno-rafforzare-la-massoneria-riflessioni-su-alcune-parole-di-a-dugin/

[iv] Fronda, Alexander Dugin: I am waiting for Ivan the Terrible, March 1998 – https://www.fronda.pl/a/aleksander-dugin-czekam-na-iwana-groznego,45653.html

[v] ibid

[vi] Echevarria, Javier, “The driving force for the apostolic work”, Opus Dei, Nov. 29, 2011 – https://opusdei.org/en-ca/article/the-driving-force-for-the-apostolic-work/

[vii] Vladivostok Sunrise, Issue Number One Hundred Eight, November 1, 2012, pg. 4

[viii] Opus Judei, 2000, Bogota, Columbia – http://www.reductio.net/OpusJudei-Index.html

[ix] Ibid, Ch. 1, part 3

[x] Ibid, Ch. 1, part 7

[xi] Ibid, Ch. 3, part 4

[xii] Ibid

[xiii] Ibid, Ch. 1, part 14

Bollyn as Adam Green’s Israel conduit and the Duginist Axis for Peace Conference

Timothy Fitzpatrick — Fri, 31 Mar 2023 05:27:45 +0000

Green and Morphonios in Jerusalem.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 30, 2023 Anno Domini

Two of the biggest questions I have about that manufactured disinformation operator Adam Green of Know More News is how he got in and out of Israel unscathed and why a high-profile 9/11 truther bothered to go to Green’s home and do several interviews with him.

At the time, 2018 and prior, Green didn’t have a large following. He is educated in business administration, worked as a grunt at ViaSat, and has very limited historical or theological knowledge, much less conspiracy research knowledge (his bait is your basic Leftist anti-Zionism). So why would the supposed king of 9/11 research Christopher Bollyn (aka Kinky Balloon, according to the late Michael Collins Piper) bother with a crummy little Youtuber like Adam Green? He’s appeared on CNN^[1], been interviewed by Haaretz^[2], and attended many lectures at Kremlin-backed conferences around the world talking about the Anglo-Israeli orchestration of the 9/11 attacks. Why on Earth would Bollyn care about some wannabe Youtube star like Green? Green is not unique or special. He just interviews random people (but how random was Bollyn?) and reads on video what others have researched or written, which is appealing to younger people who don’t like reading and would rather watch.

Green and Bollyn at Green’s Carlsbad, California home.

The only reasonable conclusion one could come to is that Bollyn is “giving a rub” to Green. No, I am not talking about Bollyn’s sexual proclivities, although those can’t be ruled out. What I am talking about is the figurative passing of the torch. Once again, we turn to the deceptive world of professional wrestling to understand real world deception:

*rub

“Helping a less popular wrestler get over by associating them with a more prominent or popular wrestler.”^[3]

“Get over” means to be accepted by the crowd and potentially become popular. Green is the less popular disinfo artist being associated with a much more prominent one in Bollyn. Apparently, the rub Alex Jones gave to Green didn’t work very well, which is why Green left the Infowars fold? So if Bollyn and Green are the wrestlers, who is the promoter? Indications point to the East, as I suggested in Christopher Bollyn gatekeeping 9/11 truth on behalf of Moscow? If you haven’t read this article yet, please do so before reading on here.

Bollyn with Lebanon’s Islamic Prime Minister Selim al Hoss at the close of the “anti-imperialist” Axis for Peace conference in Brussels, Belgium.

Could it be that Bollyn, who not only lived in Israel working in the Marxist Kibbutz system but also married an Eastern European-derived Israeli woman (Bosmat Merimsky) who worked in the Israeli defense services, provided Green the connection with which he could pass in and out of Israel with relative ease? Green was publicly anti-Zionist at the time he went to Israel (and just happened to bump into fellow anti-Zionist and Kremlin shill Jake Morphonios-on Russian TV/ a contributor to pro-Kremlin Iranian site).^[4] You would think the Israeli authorities, who monitor this stuff like hawks, would have roughed up the gangly hipster, at least a little bit. But as far as we can tell from the videos Green posted, nothing at all happened to him or Morphonios. It’s possible Green’s “former” employer Viasat could’ve provided help with Green’s access to Israel, as ViaSat is sponsored by the Israeli government^[5], but for that to be possible, it seems Green would have to have been more than just a grunt working in an IT depot. But who knows. Bottom line, it’s highly suspicious that a publicly anti-Zionist figure is traversing Zion with ease.

Bollyn seems to be more connected then he lets on. Add to the list of the Communist connections outlined in my first article on Bollyn (linked above), I came across more in Communist Venezuela. I happen to have spent some time in that country and know with certainty that it is a Communist country^[6], despite Kremlin narratives to contrary (you will find much of the alt media championing Venezuela as an anti-globalist freedom fighter, which is typical Commie rhetoric).

In February 2006, Bollyn claims that the late American Free Press publisher Willis Carto assigned him to cover a story in the “Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela” (Simon Bolivar was a freemason, Soviet-styled “liberator”, much like Che Guevara) and petition dictator Hugo Chavez for support for the AFP. Brewing in the background at this time, Michael Collins Piper at American Free Press grew suspicious of Bollyn and seemed to see him as some kind of Israeli operative that was sent to the newspaper as a plant. Piper suspects that Bollyn was trailing him all the way in Mexico, long before they officially met. Long story short, Bollyn was fired by AFP—along with Kremlin asset Raphael M. Johnson (currently writes for such shill sites as Russia Insider)—and then retaliated by accusing AFP of being a Zionist operation (via the Mark Lane angle) and used stunts (staging his own arrest by police) to try and hijack AFP’s audience for his own gain—a series of events that tend to confirm Piper’s suspicions that indeed Bollyn was an Israeli operator. It seems Bollyn was there to prevent AFP and/or Piper from unearthing too much truth, or just to cause dissension and infighting. Bollyn then began feuds with others in the patriot movement, including the late Victor Thorn.^[7] The demoralizing thing about the feud between Bollyn, Piper, Hufschmid, Daryl Bradford Smith, and WingTV was that they all seemed to have Leftist, pro-Kremlin leanings and espoused mainly generic anti-Zionist viewpoints (see The Kremlin directs the anti-Zionist movement on behalf of Israel).

Can anyone see the parallels with Adam Green, first attaching himself to Infowars, leaving it, then accusing it of being a Zionist operation? Infowars is no doubt a Kremlin-Israeli sponsored outfit, but the parallel remains.

“At the time, I was in Europe covering the Ernst Zundel trial in Mannheim and had made excellent contacts with Lebanese and Syrian leaders at the Axis of Peace conference in Brussels,” Bollyn says. This was in late 2005, before his Venezuela excursion.^[8]

The Axis For Peace conference has all the hallmarks of a KGB operation. Of course, we know the “peace movement” is a Soviet front to ultimately promote Western disarmament for greater ease of Communist victory over the world. The Conference, which listed Bollyn as a panelist^[9], was sponsored by Russia Today, Al Jazeera, Tele Sur (Venezuela state media) and others (while in Venezuela myself, I remember watching a documentary on Tele Sur called Painful Deceptions, which I learned years later was the work of Bollyn associate Eric Hufschmidt. It was another typical Soviet-styled 9/11 bait documentary—blaming the West for 9/11 and some Zionist elements thrown in to make it seem legitimate. Evidently, the Bollyn did get through to the Venezuelan government, at least in as far as getting his buddy Hufschmid’s documentary televised). Most of the other panelists and presenters at the conference were of Marxist, U.N., and/or Islamic persuasions, much like sister conferences like the Duginist New Horizons conference of Iran that our resident Vatican II shill E. Michael Jones is known for attending.

The conference’s final declaration stated,

“We salute the mediation of Russia who stands by the application of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and the presumption of innocence in international relations. We call upon the UN General Assembly to support Russia’s efforts in favor of the re-establishment of a multilateral dialogue; to support its strong stance against financing terrorism, double standards in international politics and the interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states.”^[10]

It might as well have called for Dugin’s multi-polar world order cry with Putin as the peacemaker.

Dugin collaborator Soviet General Leonid Ivashov at the Axis for Peace Conference, at which Bollyn was a panelist.

The most notable figure at Axis for Peace was former aide to the Soviet Ministry of Defense General Leonid Ivashov, who was involved in the writing of Aleksandr Dugin’s 1997 Eurasianist propaganda piece Foundations of Geopolitics.^[11] Also in attendance was KGB operative Yasser Arafat’s advisor Ahmad Tibi. Interestingly, Lyndon LaRouche’s wife Helga Zepp-LaRouche was there, too. You would think at some point in all of Bollyn’s conferencing around the world that he would have crossed paths with Dugin himself.

Bollyn with Duginist Ivashov.

Back to Bollyn’s Venezuela trip, he used it as a chance to shill for the Latino-Soviet regime, defending the overweight hillbilly Chavez (locals told me how sounded like a hillbilly anytime he spoke), condemning the U.S. for unjustly vilifying the Bolivarian government, and glorifying life in the socialist hellhole.^[12]

“Hundreds of thousands of poor Americans in five Northeastern states have been on the receiving end of Venezuela ‘s generosity. This winter alone, hundreds of thousands of low-income Americans from Pennsylvania and New York to Maine and Vermont have received more than 25 million gallons of subsidized heating oil for their homes.” Bollyn wrote.^[13]

In the first in his series about Venezuela, Bollyn penned the letter from Margarita Island,^[14] which is a tourist destination in Venezuela. You have to wonder if Bollyn was ever shown the shanties and absolute squalor that dominates Venezuela. Or maybe he was but chose to ignore it for the good of the Mother Russia.

Notes:

CNN, Paula Zahn Now, Jan. 23, 2007 – https://www.bitchute.com/video/wrPmKPCtXSH5/ ↑
Cohen, Nussbaum Debra, 9/11 Truther’s Controversial Speech at Hipster Brooklyn Bastion Draws Protesters, Police, Sept. 9, 2016, Haaretz – https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/americas/2016-09-09/ty-article/9-11-truthers-controversial-speech-at-hipster-bastion-draws-protesters-nypd/0000017f-e7fe-df2c-a1ff-ffffeebb0000 ↑
Glossary of professional wrestling terms – Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_professional_wrestling_terms ↑
Adam Green and Jake Morphonios In Jerusalem, Will they Enter Gaza?, Grassroots United911—Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHyypOxjajM ↑
De Selding, Peter B., Viasat & Israel, rebuffed by ITU in October, renew case for in-service-deadline extension for Viasat-3 EMEA, Space Intel Report, March 15, 2022 – https://www.spaceintelreport.com/viasat-israel-rebuffed-by-itu-in-october-renew-case-for-in-service-deadline-extension-for-viasat-3-emea/ ↑
Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Venezuela is a Commie hellhole, Fitzpatrick Informer, July 11, 2019 – https://fitzinfo.net/2019/07/11/venezuela-is-a-commie-hell-hole/ ↑
Wing TV, Christopher Bollyn Arrest: Man or Mouse?, WING TV, June 2008 – https://web.archive.org/web/20100430195828/http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/bollyn.html ↑
Bollyn, Christopher, Christopher Bollyn Responds to Michael Piper’s Lies About Willis Carto’s “Chavez Project”, 29 November 2006, Huge Questions – http://www.hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/Bollyn/BollynResponseToPiperNov2006.html ↑
Panelists, Axis For Peace 2005 – https://web.archive.org/web/20120419015908/http://www.axisforpeace.net/rubrique41.html ↑
Final Declaration, Axis For Peace 2005 – https://web.archive.org/web/20120622104516/http://www.axisforpeace.net/article681.html ↑
Leonid Ivashov, Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Ivashov ↑
Bollyn, Christopher, Chavez influence growing, American Free Press, Jan. 7, 2006 – https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/chavez_influence_growing.html ↑
Bollyn, Christopher, Letter from Venezuela, American Free Press, Feb. 17, 2006 – https://www.facts-are-facts.com/news/letter-from-venezuela ↑
ibid ↑