By Timothy Fitzpatrick

What explains the contradictory theological and political positions of so called traditional Catholic E. Michael Jones is the dark art of Hermetic Kabbalah.

All the things his critics accuse him of being that seem to contradict the bowtie-wearing Catholic image: a Communist, modernist defender of the Second Vatican Council, Islamophile, Eurasianist, Duginist, anti-Semite, race denier, Opus Dei member, gun grabber, Kremlin asset—can all harmoniously fit together under the context of an undercover Hermetic Kabbalist within traditional Catholic circles.

Hermetic Qabalah (Kabbalah) was developed during the Renaissance under so called Catholics Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and Marsilio Ficino (see this author’s book review Pico della Mirandola the true father of Second Vatican Council, claims author). These two subversives adapted the Jewish Kabbalah, Christianized it, and claimed that it could be used by Catholics to validate the divinity of Jesus Christ. As well, they claimed Kabbalah revealed secret truths not available in Catholic Canon. But beneath their sophistry is a heretical philosophy no true Catholic would ever accept were it presented in its raw form. That is the neo-Platonic “perennial philosophy” or Prisca Theologia, which is a form of universalism or syncretism that sees core truths in all belief systems (what Jones calls the “ultimate reality”). The Catholic Church condemns this as religious indifferentism (the heretical idea that no belief is superior to another and that all beliefs are valid ways to truth or to god[s]). It seems that the goal of this syncretism, under Eastern Kabbalistic Jewish management, is to centralize all beliefs, as it did with the social and political order under Bolshevism, to usher in their false messiah. Russian-Jewish Kabbalist rabbi Mikhail Laitman, with whom Jones debated and agreed in a 2019 interview, sees the Eurasian powers ushering in a utopic Kabbalistic new age of absolute centralized power and worship, under the guise of the redemptive messianic age.

E. Michael Jones claims that he left the anti-war hippy movement of his youth (a Marxist movement) after reading a book by Catholic monk Thomas Merton, himself a seeming perennialist.^[1] Jones’ 2020 book Logos Rising: A History of Ultimate Reality is perhaps the biggest indication that the 78-year-old Indiana-based influencer falls into the perennial school and continues the centuries-old dark legacy of kabbalistic subversion of the Catholic Church begun by Pico. In his book, Jones attempts to depersonalize the unique person of Jesus Christ (God in the flesh) and turn Him into some abstract, pantheistic notion^[2] of the ordering principle of the universe—something perennialists have done for hundreds of years with their idea of “god” (see this site’s review of Logos Rising by Ryan Augustine). While it is not incorrect to refer to Jesus Christ as the Logos (or even loosely as the light) described in the Book of St. John, it is Jones’ overemphasis and overdevelopment of this theme that takes him out of a Catholic position and places him in the Hermetic camp, or at the very least a perennialist camp. St. John does not allow any kind of depersonalization of the Messiah, nor does any other book of the New Testament. The idea of a depersonalized “Logos” (the Adam Kadmon of Ein Soph, to “traditionalist” kabbalists like Jones contemporary Alexander Dugin) is central to perennialist philosophy as well as to its more advanced form of hermetic Kabbalah in Aleister Crowley’s Thelema magik and Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (Jones’ logos book happens to depict on its front cover a golden dawn, perhaps over Renaissance Florence—once home to Pico della Mirandola). Crowley’s logos (also Dugin’s “dark logos”^[3]) helps the adept to “do what though wilt”. Jones is an associate of Crowleyite Dugin, an admitted Rene Guenonian perennialist. Jones says he first met Dugin at the Kremlin-sponsored 6^th International New Horizon Conference at Mashad, Iran in 2018. Since then, the two have cross-promoted each other. Jones, who claims “I always felt that my gaze was to the East”^[4] and who prays for the end to the “American Empire, is an ardent supporter of Dugin’s Eurasianism in the form of so called “multipolar” geopolitics, which is nothing more than a repackaged form of anti-Western Soviet Communism. Anti-Zionism is his excuse for embracing this position (see Operation SIG), as the West is just a Zionist lackey state that needs to be abolished in order to achieve world peace, according to Jones. Dugin’s worldview is almost identical to Jones’ except Dugin dresses his agenda in Eastern Orthodox/Fascist garb instead of Catholic. As a side note, Dugin’s late daughter Darya once used the pseudonym surname of Platonova, in honour of Plato. Neo-Platonism lurks behind all the Kabbalah of all these perennialists, it seems.

Jones’ longtime support of the Eurasianist agenda—the idea that the rulers of the Eurasian landmass have an inherit and even messianic right to rule over the rest of the planet—fits into a perennialist worldview, where borders and races are erased to make way for the universal Soviet man (global Communism) who follows a universal religion of religions. Jones glowingly claims God is bringing about a “Eurasianist…New World Order”.^[5] This perennialism also explains, to a large degree, Jones’ absurd denial of race. If Jones were smart politically, he would back off this position, but he can’t help himself, which seems to suggest he is more than just an opportunistic perennialist. He must be an ideological subverter (and, yes, money factors in as well, as Jones allegedly is a millionaire). Then again, it could merely be his narcissism seeping through on this issue (they can never be wrong). In order to harmonize the world under centralized governance, you have to create the borderless, raceless Soviet man. Jones also isn’t very smart when he makes the implausible assertion that Communism and China were never a threat, so he relies on the ignorance of his audience (narcissists are always smarter than everyone else). Communism becomes a guarantor of his perennialist worldview, for only a collectivist society under a collectivist religion can achieve utopia. He must defend Communism, although couched in vague terms like “solidarism” and “multipolarism”, at all costs if his fellow perennialists are to reach the apex of civilization. We now know that materialistic atheism was never the ultimate goal of the Soviet system but only a step. To institute Kabbalah globally, you have to first destroy the existing order, which is Christianity. To destroy Christianity, you have to implement a temporal phase of anti-religionism but also a permanent phase of collectivism.

“Russia will become the capital of Kabbalah,” writes Laitman. “Marxism-Leninism prepared us for Kabbalah.”^[6]

Showing the Eastern Jewishness of Communism presents a problem for perennialists like Jones. This is why he completely ignores Chabad Lubavitch (the most powerful, kabbalistic, Soviet-derivec Jewish organization in the world)^[7] and instead tries to separate the two and seemingly neutralize them individually. To achieve this, Jones instills in the reader the idea that the threat of Communism is long past and was merely a “category of the mind” and that the Jewish question is really only about Zionism or Western capitalist liberal Jewry. This decouples real Jewry (based in the East) from Communism and, simultaneously, Russia from Jewry. It also leaves the door open for “dialogue” with so called anti-Zionist Jews like Neturei Karta, with whom Jones is chummy. Chabad is also arguably anti-Zionist at its core.

The reader of Jones might argue that Jones attacks Jewry at a fundamental level (namely in their rejection of Christ, which was the theme of The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History). To that I would say that it is more obfuscation, for the different schools of Judaism (Eastern Hasidism vs. Western Talmudic/Zionism) will oppose each another, even to the point of condemnation. These so called Christian Kabbalists can even say anti-Semitic things, for it is the Jew who misinterpreted the Kabbalah, not the learned like the Pico Della Mirandolas, Ficinos, and Joneses of the world. As it is, however, Jones never really goes deep in his critiques of the Talmud (which he doesn’t even mention all that much), and especially not the Kabbalah. He keeps the reader focused on Zionism and the culture warring coming from Jews of the Western Left. He keeps his audience fixated on general, simpleton issues like abortion, feminism, pornography, and war, which are easy to pin exclusively on the West using highly controlled narratives. He knows that as long as he says the word “Jew” enough, his audience will applaud him and not notice the glaring holes and contradictions in his positions or the deeper subjects he ignores. Jones dualistic relationship with Jewry corresponds with Eurasianism founder Yakov Bromberg’s dualism between Eastern Jewry’s Hasidic orientalism that he championed against Western Jewry’s Talmudic-capitalist-liberalism. Dugin seems to have merely repackaged Bromberg’s concept of a Jewish-based Eurasianism and, in turn, Jones has internalized Dugin’s Eurasianism and repackaged it in Catholic dressing. Therefore, Jones’ so-called anti-Semitism is merely selective and strategic, with kabbalistic syncretism as its goal.

Jones’ support for the obviously error-ridden Second Vatican Council appears to be another perennialist-based position. The conciliar errors are all about fostering acceptance of all faiths as equally valid; thereby, preparing the world for acceptance of the false Christ world leader. Jones must defend this robber council above all else, even if he has to attack the traditional Latin mass itself. Jones attacking sedevacantism and the SSPX is one thing, for they are technically schismatic, but for him to attack the Latin mass in general makes no sense from a Catholic point of view. What does make sense is that Jones is not actually Catholic and knows the threat the TLM poses in attempting to undo Vatican 2 prescriptions and restore the Church. The TLM strengthens the idea of one, true faith, tradition, a knowable and personal messiah, and exclusivity; therefore, Jones must deconstruct the TLM and promote the V2 mass in order to prevent any hindrance to the agenda. That’s what Vatican 2-inspired clown masses are all about—to merge Catholicism with every other belief and make a mockery of Catholicism’s uniqueness. These snakes are preparing us for the anti-Christ one-world syncretic religious system, which will accompany a form of global Communism led by Jewish orientalists.

Now that we understand that Jones’ goal is religious pluralism, we can easily understand his championing of Islam and horrendous Islamic regimes like Iran. But his Islamophilic position serves another purpose. Islam is one of the most effective instruments of direct revolutionary terrorism with which to destabilize non-Communist nations in preparation for global collectivism. Jones can declare “Allahu akbar!” with no reservations, as he did with fellow Islamic Communist Kevin Barrett, and have no problem calling himself Catholic.^[8] See this site’s index on the close association between Islam and Marxist revolutionary terrorism.

The “Catholic” cult Opus Dei was started by a man named Josemaría Escrivá, who is believed to have been a Kabbalist^[9]. Opus Dei also has connections to the Communist world, especially Communist influence networks and their operatives posing as traditional Catholics. Jones has denied being a member of this cult, but “the work”, like Freemasonry, instructs its members to obscure their membership from the public. Jones’ overrepresented associations with Opus Dei are well known.^[10]

To finish off any remaining resistance to the New World Socialist Order agenda, the right of the citizenry to bear arms must be removed. E. Michael Jones is all for this. He seems to use his Soviet-based anti-war, anti-U.S. imperialism agenda to validate being anti-gun. His audience should not be fooled by this, though. It makes no sense from a truly Catholic point of view. Jones knows that in order to create the socialist Soviet utopia, individual arms possession must be eliminated in order to create a smoother transition from the free world to absolute anti-Christ collectivism.

Notes:

1. The Engaged Contemplative Spirituality of Thomas Merton, Issue 4, 2017, Beshara Magazine – https://besharamagazine.org/metaphysics-spirituality/thomas-merton-engaged-contemplative-spirituality/ ↑
2. Augustine, Ryan, Logos Rising Book Review Chapter Notes, Oct. 3, 2023 – https://fitzinfo.net/forum/topic/logos-rising-book-review-chapter-notes/ ↑
3. Kazachkin, Andrey, Dugin’s ‘dark logos’ sponsored by Russian Orthodox Church, Jan. 6, 2023 – https://fitzinfo.net/forum/topic/dugins-dark-logos-sponsored-by-russian-orthodox-church/ ↑
4. “I never had that identification with America. I always felt that my gaze was to the East.” —E. Michael Jones (54:07 mark-Guillermo Vásquez Interviews E. Michael Jones: What Is Identity?) – https://player.fm/series/culture-wars-podcast/guillermo-vasquez-interviews-e-michael-jones-what-is-identity ↑
5. Jones, Eugene Michael, Who Is destroying our civilization?, Interview – https://odysee.com/@Fitzinfo:c/Screen-Recording-2026-10-02-at-21.07.14:4 ↑
6. Laitman, Michael, ‘Russia will become the capital of Kabbalah…Marxism-Leninism prepared us for Kabbalah’: rabbi Michael Laitman, Feb. 24, 2003, IZ – https://fitzinfo.net/2024/02/22/russia-will-become-the-capital-of-kabbalah-rabbi-michael-laitman/ ↑
7. Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Most powerful Jewish organization in world Chabad completely absent from E. Michael Jones’ writings, The Fitzpatrick Informer, Jan. 28, 2023 – https://fitzinfo.net/2023/01/28/most-powerful-jewish-organization-in-world-chabad-completely-absent-from-e-michael-jones-writings/ ↑
8. Odysee – https://odysee.com/@Fitzinfo:c/Jones-and-Barrett-praise-allah:8 ↑
9. Carlos de Borbon, Alfonso, Opus Judei, Orion Publications, 1994 – http://www.reductio.net/OpusJudei-Index.html ↑
10. Engel, Randy, All the Men Behind the Opus Dei Curtain – https://newengelpublishing.com/all-the-men-behind-the-opus-dei-curtain/ ↑

By Richard Sale
Dec. 14, 1987

WASHINGTON (UPI)—Soviet infiltration of Israel’s spy agency, Mossad, is the most serious blow to Israeli intelligence since the 1970s and U.S. intelligence also was breached as a result, U.S. sources reveal.

Mossad has been penetrated by “highly placed” Soviet moles and a full-scale internal counterintelligence investigation is under way, the intelligence source said.

A Justice Department source said U.S. counterintelligence agents became aware of the Israeli-Soviet espionage pipeline when data stolen by Jonathan Jay Pollard, a U.S. Navy analyst convicted of spying for Israel, was “traced to the Eastern bloc.”

Intelligence sources said data reaching the Soviets via this route included sensitive U.S. weapons technology and strategic information about the defense forces of Turkey, Pakistan, and moderate Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia.

U.S. intelligence analysts said the Pollard data was traded to the Soviets in return for promises to increase emigration of Soviet Jews to Israel.

One analyst said Israel’s “right-wing” Jews are involved with spying for the Soviets, and called it “ironic”, noting that left-wing elements were responsible for similar scandals in the past.

A senior U.S. official said morale in Mossad “had plummeted” but refused to comment on whether the breach had damaged U.S.-Israeli intelligence ties.

In Jerusalem, an Israeli government spokesman denied knowledge of the security breach.

“I know nothing about all that,” said Avi Pazner, spokesman for the prime minister’s office. “It seems to be utter fantasy.”

A State Department spokesman also declined to comment. But an administration official said the Soviet penetration of Mossad was discussed at meetings of CIA, FBI, and other U.S. counterintelligence specialists about the Pollard case.

“One of the guys was commenting that if Pollard had stolen stuff, at least it was going to a U.S. ally, but a CIA guy spoke up and said that if Mossad was involved it meant that copies of everything were going to (the KGB’s) Moscow center,” the source said.

Pollard began serving a life sentence early this year in what U.S. officials have called one of the worst intelligence disasters in U.S. history.

Asked to describe the Israeli-Soviet spies, an administration intelligence source said: “They are highly placed agents in the top at very significant levels.”

Israel has launched a full-scale investigation into the Soviet infiltration, disguising it as “a probe into financial corruption” of some Mossad agents, an administration source said.

The source emphasized that “counterintelligence investigations always begin with the painstaking study of financial vouchers,” inquiries aimed at determining whether an agent has received large, unexplained payments or lived an unusually high lifestyle. Another source said most double agents “are caught by the study of documents.”

Israel apparently was first used as a base for Soviet agents in the early 1960s, when Professor Kurt Sitte, a nuclear physicist at the Institute of Technology of Haifa, was exposed as a Soviet agent.

Sitte, a specialist in cosmic radiation working with the U.S. Air Force, was convicted in 1961.

A subsequent case was uncovered the follow year. Dr. Israel Beer, a former aide to the chief of staff of the Israeli army, was arrested after he became liaison officer on intelligence to then Defense Minister David Ben-Gurion.

Aided by a tip from the British Secret Service MI5, beer was arrested on charges he passed data to the Soviets.

In the 1970s, more trouble came from left-wing Sabras, or native-born Israelis, who had ideological sympathies with the Soviet Union. One case involved a former Israeli paratrooper who spied for Soviet-backed Syria.

U.S. intelligence analysts said the latest penetration by Soviet agents occurred in the early 1980s under the administration of Defense Minister Ariel Sharon.

The sources said they were aware of “reports” of meetings between Israeli and Soviet officials on Cyprus, a well-known base for Soviet espionage operations against Israel.

Administration officials confirmed that the island nation’s capital, Nicosia, is an important KGB base and a meeting place for Soviet agents operating in Middle Eastern countries such as Israel.

A U.S. intelligence analyst said he was not surprised that the Soviets had placed agents in the Sharon government because Sharon “surrounded himself with people who were extraordinarily vulnerable to penetration.”

He declined to elaborate.

The Mossad was founded in 1937 in England to handle large-scale and then illegal emigration of Jews from Europe to Palestine, then under British control.

By 1942, a secret agent training site was set up at Mikveh, Israel, a cultural school outside of Tel Aviv. Courses included cryptography, map-reading, lock-picking, and other intelligence skills.

After Israel was created in 1948, counterintelligence was handled by the Shin Beth, the Israeli equivalent of the FBI.

Israeli government sources say Mossad has about 2,000 employees, of which, 500 are officers. A CIA report, found during the 1979 U.S. embassy takeover in Tehran, said, “Israel’s intelligence and security services are among the best in the world.”

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 8, 2024 Anno Domini

The rhetoric that Zionist Israel is a colonialist Anglo-American creation is a cover story for the Soviet procurement, financing, and staffing of the Marxist state of Israel.

It seems that this cover story is part of the Soviets’ Operation SIG (Zionist government), whose aim is to frame the West and white Europeans for any perceived evils coming from the Zionist movement and the state of Israel in preparation for the discrediting and eventual destruction of the West to make way for Soviet world imperium.

Israel was founded on May 13, 1948 by the recently Soviet-founded United Nations and its Partition Plan for Palestine (Resolution 181), and the Soviets were the first power to officially recognize de jure Israel.^[1] On 29 November 1947, Soviet foreign minister Andrei Gromyko (suspected crypto-Jew^[2]) stood up at the podium before the U.N. General Assembly in New York and called for the partition of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states following a long speech about how badly the Jews had been done to and the horrors of the Holocaust. The Assembly then cast their votes, with 33 nations voting in favour, 13 against, and 10 more abstaining. Of those 33 in favour, 16 were either Soviet Bloc countries or had Euro-Communist styled “social democrat” governments (another three countries voting yes to the partition plan had masonic-led governments). The socialists/Communists won the vote for “Israel”. They were the deciding factor. With the majority Soviet Bloc swinging the vote, Israel would not have been founded, regardless of the United States (a reluctant “yes” vote under duress) and Great Britain (abstained from vote).

“Stalin then organized the Eastern European Communist states to vote for the creation of Israel as the decisive bloc that provided the two-thirds majority needed for victory in the UN vote of November 29, 1947,” admitted Israel’s Ynet News in its 2015 article The Soviet Union’s forgotten role in the creation of Israel.^[3]

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s deranged strategist Aleksandr Dugin said, “at a definite stage these ‘red-brown’ Jewish Eurasianists also have prepared the creation of the state of Israel, having started under the direction (and the approval) of Moscow.”^[4]

President Harry Truman (freemason), representing the United States, voted yes; although, the American nod was coerced with the help of pestering American Jews in Washington. Truman’s administration warned him about Soviet manipulation.^[5]

“Truman was opposed by his own administration and especially by the top officials of the State Department, then led by Secretary of State Marshall, all of whom who were afraid the Arab nations would be driven into the Soviet bloc and, subsequently, close off their oil wells, which, in turn, would bring the industry and economic growth of the superpower to a halt.”

Marshall sensed what was to come of the partition plan.

Further reluctance to granting Jewish statehood was displayed by Truman when he boldly sated, “Jesus Christ couldn’t please them when he was here on earth, so how could anyone expect that I would have any luck?”^[6]

This should put to rest Soviet-seeded lies about Zionism being an extension of Anglo-American imperialism (colonialism) and the strategically placed “ZOG” narrative designed to mislead as to the true nature of the Jewish-masonic conspiracy. The West is not to blame whatsoever. Subsequent British-American policies supporting Israel and Zionism up to present time are under duress due to further Judeo-masonic and KGB subversion of their governments and the deceiving of Western masses as to the true purpose of supporting Israel and Zionism (the draining of Western resources for ultimate Soviet gain, technology transfers to hostile Eastern powers via Israel [like the U.S. traitor Jonathan Pollard], and the displacement of mostly Islamic hordes for eventual subversive placement in Western nations to disrupt the Christian fabric of society). It seems that Anglo-American support for Israel post 1948 is under the false impression that supporting Israel would curtail the spread of Islam and its Jihadist ways. Had this actually been the case, Western support for Zionism would have been justified; however, we now know that Jewry strategically has been supporting Islamic expansion as revenge against Christianity.

Those who object to the facts of Israel’s founding—those hell bent on blaming the “Anglo-American establishment” for all the world’s problems might argue that although the British abstained from partition plan vote, the Balfour Declaration provided the substance for the eventual formation of the Zionist state. This also isn’t accurate. The idea of a post-Christ Jewish homeland in the Middle East was not new and not Western. In 1881, Russian Jew Leon Pinsker (Lev Semyonovich Pinsker) founded the Rothschild-backed Lovers of Zion (Hibbat Zion), whose aim was to foster Jewish emigration from Russia to Palestine in reaction to Russia’s pogroms. Pinsker’s Zionist organization was only one of several founded by Russian and Eastern European Jews at that time. In 1890, the anti-Jewish Russia Tsar even granted charity status to Pinsker’s The Society for the Support of Jewish Farmers and Artisans in Syria and Eretz Israel, also known as the Odessa Committee (composed of some 4,000 members). Pinsker died a year later and the Committee was eventually absorbed by Theodore Herzl’s World Zionist Organization after the First Zionist Congress in 1897 (from which the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are believed to have originated). Without these Eurasian-based Zionist organizations, it’s unlikely that Israel would have been founded, especially considering Rothschild’s failed attempt to get the British to see the project through. The British eventually became aware, to some degree, of the true nature of the Zionist movement and called World Zionist Organization president Chaim Weizmann and his group “Communists”.^[7] Even just after Balfour declared for the Zionist state, the British continued to support Arab independence in Palestine. Providing further reluctance to the British were the routine assassinations and public hangings of British troops in Mandatory Palestine by fanatical Marxist Jewish terrorists—all tied in some way to the plethora of Eurasian-based Zionist organizations (these same Marxist Jewish terrorists went on to found Israel’s defense organizations, like Mossad. Former Mossad officer Juval Aviv admitted that “Mossad…it’s an old Russian school”). By 1947, Balfour’s declaration in support of a Jewish homeland had faded from the memory of a weary British establishment. They had had enough. They withdrew from Palestine and refused to vote in favour of Stalin’s Soviet Zionist initiative. World Jewry had repaid British peacekeeping in Palestine with treason and murder and created a void just waiting to be filled by Stalin and the Soviets.

“Stalin hoped that Israel’s creation would lead to chaos in the region and bring about the downfall of the British Empire; and that Israel, with strong socialist leadership, might become a quasi-satellite of the Soviet Union.”^[8]

With nearly every single Prime Minister of Israel, even up to current PM Binyamin Netanyahu, being Soviet derived^[9] and the Marxist-styled society that developed in Israel after 1948^[10], it appears that Stalin’s wishes came true.

Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion admitted “that without the Soviet arms, the state would never have survived the onslaught of five Arab armies.”^[11]

Romanian Soviet defector Ion Mihai Pacepa claimed that the use of Israel as a Communist weapon against the capitalist West continued well after Stalin and that then KGB head Yuri Andropov executed Operation SIG to really draw out Soviet-styled anti-colonialism in the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, and the Islamic world in general. That idea was that if the Soviets could use Israel to very visibly Balkanize the Middle East (as outlined in the Oded Yinon Plan) under the banner of the Balfour Declaration and the West, the Soviets could achieve control in the region while the West would be blamed for the genocide and human rights violations the Soviets themselves had implemented. Meanwhile, the anti-Zionist world, unaware that the Soviets were orchestrating the entire thing, would come to the Soviet side in the hopes of being liberated from supposed colonialist “Zionist oppression”. Arab support for the Soviets would allow the Soviets to further penetrate Islamic Jihad movements and arm and control the Arab side of the conflict, in accordance with the Leninist-styled dialectical method^[12]. Andropov’s deceptive plan would not only turn the Arab world against the West, it would also help radicalize the West’s burgeoning Leftist movement against its own “Zionist occupied” governments, creating further destabilization of Western societies.

Stalin’s use of the Zionist state in the Communist offensive would reach levels that perhaps even he couldn’t have imagined. What started out as perhaps only a device to stick it to the British evolved into a highly sophisticated dialectic that has been a thorn in the side of the West ever since. It has directly contributed to the West’s ongoing demise and is uplifting the Eurasianist neo-Soviet East to be the single world superpower.

“Let’s agree with the formation of Israel. It will be like an awl in the ass for the Arab states and make them turn their backs on Britain… British influence will be completely undermined in Egypt, Syria, Turkey and Iraq,” Stalin said.^[13]

Notes:

1. Lokshin, Alexander, Soviet Union and Israel: From Recognition to Severing Diplomatic Relations (1948–1953), Lechaim Magazine, May 14, 2023 – https://fitzinfo.net/forum/topic/stalin-lets-agree-with-the-formation-of-israel-it-will-be-like-an-awl-in-the-ass-for-the-arab-states-and-make-them-turn-their-backs-on-britain/ ↑
2. List of disguised Jews – https://hasid.livejournal.com/220465.html ↑
3. Adelman, Jonathan, The Soviet Union’s forgotten role in the creation of Israel, Dec. 12, 2015, Ynet News – https://fitzinfo.net/2021/03/21/the-soviet-unions-forgotten-role-in-the-creation-of-israel/ ↑
4. Dugin on the Jews – https://niqnaq.wordpress.com/2013/11/07/dugin-on-the-jews/ ↑
5. Huvila, Risto, President Truman and UN Vote 1947 – Blessing or Curse?, Times of Israel, November 30, 2019 – https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/president-truman-and-un-vote-1947-blessing-or-curse/ ↑
6. ibid ↑
7. Gorodetsky, Gabriel, The Soviet Union and the Creation of the State of Israel, pg. 4, Tel Aviv University, 2001 ↑
8. Adelman, Jonathan, The Soviet Union’s forgotten role in the creation of Israel, Dec. 12, 2015, Ynet News ↑
9. Bernstein, Jack, The Life of An American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel, The New York—Moscow—Tel Aviv Triangle, 1984 – https://fitzinfo.net/2019/05/16/new-york-moscow-tel-aviv-triangle/ ↑
10. Bernstein, Jack, The Life of An American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel, 1984 – https://fitzinfo.net/2020/05/14/communism-in-israel/ ↑
11. Adelman, Jonathan, The Soviet Union’s forgotten role in the creation of Israel, Dec. 12, 2015, Ynet News ↑
12. Bernstein, Jack, My Farewell to Israel, the Thorn in the Mideast, Pro-American Press, 1985 – https://fitzinfo.net/2020/05/21/matzpen-the-jewish-communist-party-of-israel-and-the-kibbutzim-network/ ↑
13. Lokshin, Alexander, Soviet Union and Israel: From Recognition to Severing Diplomatic Relations (1948–1953), Lechaim Magazine, May 14, 2023 ↑

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
October 22, 2023

We know that world Jewry is behind the radical Left and the Islamo-African invasion of the West, but Zionism has a script to follow, and it is one that could be exploited for Western gain.

Zionism is a tool for world Jewry (elite Jews), not an end in itself. But for many average Jews (especially conservative ones), Zionism is the end and they wholeheartedly believe in it, as do many Protestants. It seems these are the kind of Zionists with which the West could ally in order to help battle world Jewry’s greater plans of using the Left and Islam to clear the world of whites, Christians, and conservatives in preparation for their world Communist Hasidic empire.

The Zionist script is fundamentally nationalistic, moralistic, and ethno-centric, which is what the West had been up until about the 1960s when world Jewry introduced their immigration schemes and cultural Marxism. World Jewry doesn’t care for nationalism because world Jewry is cosmopolitan (Chabad admits it is “not Zionistic). Nationalism is a hindrance to their advancement. They are after world government while rank-and-file Jews simply want a homeland of their own and to, more or less, live under the security of Western mores. Ultimately, world Jewry is stringing along little Jews with a deliberately handicapped Zionism. We know this is true because world Jewry funds the anti-Zionists as well, mainly through their Eurasian channels (Russia, China, North Korea), and more and more portrays Zionism unfavourably in their mass media racket. When Soviet garden gnome Henry Kissinger not long ago predicted the imminent end to the state of Israel, he wasn’t making an educated guess, he was revealing part of world Jewry’s plan.

The trick for us is to use the Western-friendly aspects of Zionism to keep Islam and the Left under control, especially in Western countries. World Jewry knows that Zionism does not have the full support of the West and conservatives, and it prefers it this way so that it doesn’t have to push too hard in advancing the conservative values that little Jews want (before you read on here, make sure you understand what Operation SIG is all about). World Jewry just advances Zionism enough that it suits their cause of keeping the Middle East perpetually destabilized (via the Yinon Plan and Operation SIG), draining America and Britain’s reserves, and in turning the world against the West (via anti-Zionist, anti-colonialist indignation, victimization of Arabs). Your average Jew is not after these things. They want things similar to Western conservatives. Therefore, by Western conservatives coming together in support of little Jew Zionism, world Jewry’s hand is forced to advance the Zionist fundamentals that check Islamo-Leftist goals (in Israel and in allied countries like the United States, Canada, England, etc.).

You might ask how exactly this tactic would force world Jewry’s hand. It’s very simple. World Jewry fears the little Jews realizing that they are being played by their elder brothers, so they must meet their demands or else the house of cards will come crashing down and world Jewry will lose the support of its own rank-and-file members. This would create all sorts of new problems for their world program, and that is something it doesn’t seem they are prepared to tolerate. By Western conservatives supporting little Jew Zionism in greater numbers, it becomes much more difficult for world Jewry to ignore the demands of the rank and file. It might be hard for some to believe, but it seems that little Jews are under as much control, if not more, as we gentiles in the West are.

There is yet another set of hands that would be forced to act against Islam and the Left should Western conservatives come together in support of little Jew Zionism. The hands of Western governments. They are obedient to world Jewry; however, they may not be in the know of the elite Jew vs. little Jew toxic relationship. Therefore, they might not know the difference when little Jewry calls for such and such action that World Jewry does not necessarily want. For example, little Jew Zionists could demand restricted borders to Islamists in the United States (something that actually started to happen shortly after 9/11, but its momentum eventually fizzled out) and Western governments would be greatly pressured to act, especially with a large base of Western conservatives backing said little Jews. The above is just one example. There are many other commonalities we share with little Jews that could be used to pressure our governments to actually govern in our sovereign favour.

In order for this tactic to work more effectively, more Jews would have to support Zionism as well. By design, it seems that Zionism is losing a lot of support in Israel itself, as many Israeli Jews are moving toward the Left. The evidence of this is the growing support for LGBT, unfettered immigration, and anti-Zionism in Israel. The popular anti-Bibi rhetoric is an effect of this and not some awakening to the Soviet Israel control over the region as it might seem.

It seems that world Jewry’s larger goal here in this advanced stage is to destroy the West using anti-Zionism. But in order to do this, they will have to sacrifice the state of Israel in the process. They are OK with this. As I mentioned, their Zionism won’t be limited merely to the borders of Palestine but will encompass the entire globe.

We are no longer living under ideal governance in the West and the above strategy just might help us. At the very least, it might buy us a bit more time.

Championing anti-Zionism or Islam (Arabs, Palestinians, Persians etc,) is suicide for the West.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

I’ve been piquing the curiosity of my readers on Twitter and Gab now and then with snippets of indicators I’m seeing of a future controlled collapse of the Zionist state of Israel in preparation for an expanded, softer-appearing Jewish power base that will birth the anti-Christ global government.

Naturally, many are skeptical. Jewish power is so entrenched in the world today, how could the Zionist state in the Middle East possibly come to an end, they might argue. What they don’t realize is that Jews are still global nomads (cosmopolitanism) and that Israel today is merely a model for world government, not an end in itself. It’s transitory. The land itself is more symbolic than it is practical. According to the Soviet’s Operation SIG, it seems necessary that the state of Israel should come to an end as “proof” that the Soviet power structure, now reformed as the Eurasian Union, has benevolently liberated the world from the Zionist threat (appeasing elements on both the Right and the Left) and finally brought peace to “Palestine”, once and for all. This “liberation” would also put the world at ease, as Jewish power will appear to have been eradicated.

The ‘Great Eurasian Khazar Kaganate’ to be brought about by common border between Eurasian, Israel empires —rabbi Avraham Shmulevich

Of course, it might take World War 3 to bring this all about. The strife between Islam, Judaism, and Christianity likely will have to be accelerated in order to make the false liberation more impactful. Controversial as to its authenticity, General Albert Pike is alleged to have predicted a Third World War in this manner:

“The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the “agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.

Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion… We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil.

Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view.

The basis of the New Khazaria concept is that the global Khahal (elite Jews) chose Russia with which to establish its world power base and bring about their false messiah due to its historical association with the old Jewish-dominated Khazarian Empire of the sixth century, which includes the Crimean and Caucasus region. One observer sees the Moscow branch of Chabad Lubavitch overseeing the entire New Khazaria project, and not some imagined Jewish bloc in Ukraine (this distinction appears necessary due to disinformation that Ukraine is the Jewish power base and Russia and the world its victims).

“When you hear that the Russians have captured the city of Crimea, the ‘Times of the Messiah’ have started” —rabbi Vilna Gaon

The infiltration began in Kievan-Rus with the masonic-occult usurpation of imperial Russia and came about full circle, first with the Communist Russian Revolution, and thereafter with the Eurasian Economic Union and its various subsidiaries (BRICS, CSTO, Shanghai Co-operation Organization, etc.)—all part of a centuries-long strategy, apparently.

My blog started off focusing on controlled opposition but has slowly shifted to focusing on the thesis that the state of Israel is a Soviet Jewish project and not the other way around, and that Jewish power is centred in Moscow, not in Tel Aviv, London, or New York.

My research into this started as a bit of a hunch, but upon further investigation into the New Khazaria (NovoRossiya, NovoKhazaria) concept, there is some anecdotal corroboration of the theory that Israel’s days are quickly coming to a close (recently, the U.N.’s International Court of Justice announced a probe of the Zionist state). Further, I would add that if today’s Jews are indeed Khazarian-bred, as the popular theory goes, they should have less ethnic affinity for Jerusalem and more for Crimea (might it also explain the apparent Ashkenazi disdain for Sephardic Jewry?) “New Khazaria” seems to tie today’s world events together into a more logical narrative that sheds new light on the Jewish question today and where it’s headed.

Below is an excerpt taken from a posting on an Eastern Orthodox website by a Chechen named Muhammad Emmin Saidov in an article entitled “Chechen Icchkeria or the new Khazaria“. In it, he describes a meeting he had with a woman in Moscow he calls “Mrs. N” who predicted the Chechen wars of the late 1990s (used to propel Vladimir Putin to power) and the abandonment of Israel by world Jewry in favour of their new home in Russia:

The author meets Mrs. N. in Moscow. The historical homeland of the Jews. About Sumbulat Abuzarov, about Israel being destroyed, and why Sharon went to the Holy Mountain.

Moscow, Begovaya district, summer 1998. Four people met in a small room of a typical five-story building. A woman in her 60s who teaches at one of the institutes in the city on the Neva, two young people, her yesterday’s students and the author of these lines. When she found out that I was a Chechen, she first inquired about the fate of Abuzar Sumbulatov. A former teacher at the Chechen State University, who was kidnapped without a trace by unknown people in 1997 in Grozny.

I was introduced to Abuzar at the beginning of 1991. At the first meeting, it was clear that this was a man of deep and comprehensive erudition and inclined to a certain isolation. Which, most likely, was explained by the fact that I was an absolutely unknown figure for him. During this period, we briefly met two or three times and parted for a long time. In mid-July 1996, we met quite by chance in the corridor of the Government House. Pleased with the meeting, I invited Abuzar to my place, and this was our last meeting, which lasted at least two hours.

I still blame myself for letting the so-called turnover not make time for more frequent meetings with this person. The fact that I am writing this work is largely dictated by the topic of our last conversation. The years that have passed since our meeting and the events that have taken place during this period, not only in Chechnya, but throughout the entire space from the Crimea to the Caspian Sea, confirmed me in the correctness of what Sumbulatov said, and what was completely new for me and did not fit into the primitive framework of my understanding of what is happening.

To the woman’s question, I replied that I only knew that Abuzar had been kidnapped. That until now no one knows whether he is alive or dead, and added that, in my opinion, it is unlikely that he will be left alive. He knew very well the ins and outs of what was happening in the republic, and such people, even if they did not speak publicly, were extremely dangerous by the mere fact of their existence. Today I would say that any person who comes even a little closer to the mechanism for implementing the Khazara plan, to the secret inspirers of Wahhabism brought to the North Caucasus, is in mortal danger. And the tragic fate of Sumbulatov is proof of this.

After listening to me, the woman shook her head sadly and, sighing, said that back in 1982 she had warned him that there would be a war in Chechnya in the 1990s, and that he should be careful. From that moment on, I regretted that I wasted my time at this meeting. Another woman Vanga in hindsight, I thought to myself. It was uncomfortable to get up and say goodbye, and I stayed.
In principle, the meeting was about the fact that a certain professor, either a Frenchman or an Englishman of Arab origin, proved that the historical homeland of the Jews is some area in South Yemen. This very man, either a Frenchman or an Englishman, I don’t remember exactly, because I listened inattentively, was forbidden to give a course of lectures on this topic at the universities of Europe. And in our Ministry of Foreign Affairs they opened a visa, but before he had time to read it even a couple of hours, a certain official arrived from the same Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the lecturer was expelled from the country on the grounds that he allegedly had the same one that had just been issued incorrectly visa. The woman, foreseeing such a development of events, managed to transfer to a floppy disk everything that the visiting ethnographer wanted, but did not have time to tell the world, and now they enthusiastically discussed his lecture among themselves, often switching to Arabic.

When we were served tea, Mrs. N., let’s call my interlocutor that way, somehow suddenly said that two years ago one of the two institutes for the study of the Torah and the Talmud was evacuated from Israel to Russia. That soon, again, the second institute will be moved to Russia, or rather, to St. Petersburg, and after that the destruction of Israel will begin. Already disappointed by her “prophecies” about the wars in Chechnya, I, with poorly hidden causticity, noticed that it turned out to be rather illogical. The Jews, for no apparent reason, suddenly begin to destroy their state, for the creation of which they fought so much.

N. looked at me carefully and said that it would be a very big mistake to consider the Jews as a homogeneous mass. That there is a very influential stratum among them, which believes that a Jew, who locks himself within the framework of one state, albeit a Jewish one, and considers himself a citizen only of this state and does not think about fulfilling the precepts of the Torah and the Talmud about world domination, is an enemy for them.

This part of Jewry has made a decision that Israel, an island in the Muslim world, is very vulnerable both militarily and economically, in order to be the starting point for the beginning of the conquest of the world and peoples. The best place for this mission is the territory of present-day Russia, the power in which, for the most part, is controlled by Jewish circles. On the territory of which, there is most of the world’s explored reserves of strategic raw materials, which, in the event of a global crisis, can ensure economic self-sufficiency. For complete control, it is only necessary to bring the population to a figure of approximately 50-60 million people and form a dozen new states in place of the current ER-EF-II, headed by obedient puppets.

It is possible to reduce the population by actively influencing the public consciousness, or rather even the subconscious. The complex of these measures includes the erosion of the moral foundations of the Russian and other peoples of Russia through the active propaganda of an aggressive, I would say, individuality. Praise of idleness, why work if you can look under the lid and win a million, and in general, plowing is the lot of morons. The glorification of crime, open propaganda of alcohol, debauchery and hidden, but no less effective, drugs. In general, everything that happens today on our TV screens, what we hear on the radio and read in the newspapers.

Whose hands are our media and who plays the role of the first violin in them, I think, it is not worth mentioning. All these technologies for controlling the mass consciousness are described in sufficient detail in a book called “Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” Anyone who wants to know what is happening can get acquainted with it and compare what is written in it with what is happening today in our country and the world. As one humorist said, you are guaranteed an unforgettable experience.

Let no one be deceived by the frequent flickering on our home screens, with or without cause, of the hierarchs of the Orthodox Church. There is no question of any actual churching of the Russian people. In this case, we are witnessing a hidden preparation for the confrontation between Orthodoxy and Islam in favor of Judaism. Judaism, which does not shine anywhere, is not advertised, but, nevertheless, in terms of its financial power and influence on power, it will give a hundred points of odds to both Orthodoxy and Islam taken together and multiplied twice.

Population decline can also be accelerated by initiating controlled military conflicts on the territory of the state, in which the most reproductive part of the population perishes. A controlled military conflict can be regarded as the most effective means of bleeding, in the literal sense of the word, a society designated for destruction. As the most effective mechanism for financial exhaustion and the subsequent collapse of the country. Finally, as a means of controlling the internal political situation.
When, through bloody terrorist attacks organized by you or another surge of military activity, you easily take away from society the right to choose, the right to receive information, the right to express your opinion, and with extraordinary ease, put any person you like at the head of a confused and intimidated society. Just what has been happening in recent years in the country. By the way, this technology is described in detail in the “Protocols”.

Some time after our conversation in the apartment on Begovaya, the relative calm that had been established in Palestine was broken in the most unexpected way. Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon suddenly, for no apparent reason, took it into his head to take a walk on the Holy Mountain, a place especially revered by the Muslim world. There was a clear and obvious provocation aimed at inciting a new wave of conflict. Which didn’t take long to happen. I realized that the second institution mentioned by Ms. N had also been transferred to Russia, and the liquidation phase of Israel began in order to encourage the Jewish population to evacuate to Russia.

What we are seeing today in the Middle East in general and around Israel in particular is, to some extent, a reflection of a hidden war within the Jewish community. A war in which a handful of Zionists force Jews, who have become accustomed to their homeland, to decide to evacuate, considering them as material necessary for the colonization of new territories. Under the new territories, first of all, is meant a strip from the Crimea to the Caspian Sea, the indigenous peoples of which must either be destroyed in continuous military conflicts or scattered around the world.

The revival of the Khazaria is possible only if these conditions are met; the liquidation of Israel, even if thousands of Jews who do not want to follow the instructions of the Zionists die, and the solution of the issue with the indigenous peoples living within the former Khazar Khaganate.

Sharon’s act and the conflict that flared up after that dealt the first blow to my skepticism about Mrs. N. My skepticism received the second and final blow at the very end of 1999, when a new war was in full swing in Chechnya. In Gudermes, on the square in front of the building of the temporary administration of the Chechen Republic, I was introduced to the closest relative of A. Sumbulatov, and he confirmed that Abuzar in the 80s really spoke about future wars. But who could believe in those times, the times of the Soviet Union.

On the same day I contacted Moscow and asked my friends to inform me of N.’s new visit to Moscow. Our last meeting took place in the winter of 2001. First of all, I apologized for not believing that she could have foreseen events in the 80s that would shake my homeland ten years later. N. smiled and said that this was a normal reaction of a normal person and in turn asked me what I thought about the nature and nature of this conflict. I replied that, in my opinion, the conflict in the North Caucasus has all the signs to consider it manageable.

That the conflict should spread to all the republics of the North Caucasus and part of the South of Russia. That today’s war is not the end of the trials that have fallen to our lot and should be considered only as the next step in expanding the conflict and drawing new peoples into it. N. fully agreed with my assessment and noted that the whole trouble of our people is that we did not understand what kind of force we opposed during the last centuries of our history. I had to agree with her.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

A search of Evgeny Mikhail Jonesovich’s (my nickname for so called Catholic author Eugene Michael Jones) material resulted in an alarming conclusion.

Chabad Lubavitch, the Soviet-derived Chassidic Jewish crime syndicate believed to be the most powerful organization in the world and likely the descendants of the infamous “Learned Elders of Zion” is not mentioned by Jones even once on his Twitter feed, is only mentioned in passing once on his website Culture Wars (to identify Rabbi Hershey Novack), and is completely absent from  his 1,200-page magnum opus on the Jews The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (2008).

How is it that the so called biggest Catholic anti-Semite on the Internet fails to even mention the most powerful Jewish organization in the world by name, much less expose their sinister global operation to enslave the world under Talmudic rule? Does he think Chabad is some obscure group that is not worth mentioning? That is very unlikely, especially with his knowledge. What seems more likely is that he is running cover.

Before I move on, I want to point out that Jonesovich has been largely silent about the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion as well. Revolutionary Spirit mentioned it, again in passing, a mere three times. You would think a 1,200-page book about revolutionary Jews would thoroughly examine the incredible revelations made in the most infamous book critical of world Jewry.

What we have learned from the prescriptions of the Soviet’s Operation SIG is that anti-Zionism is red herring directed by Soviets/Chabad/World Jewry itself as a bit of a release valve and to limit authentic anti-Jewish sentiment (see The Kremlin directs the anti-Zionist movement on behalf of Israel). My readers should be well aware of Jonesovich’s suspicious associations with the Russian state and its actors, especially the Kabbalah-loving, anti-Zionist but pro-Jewish Aleksandr Dugin.

“Zionism is Jewish satanism. Anti-Zionist Neturei Karta represent true Jewish tradition. There will always be a place for Jewish Orientalism (Eastern Jews) in the ranks of the builders of the Great Eurasian Empire.” —Dugin

Opposing Zionism but propping up “Jewish orientalism” seems to represent an internal feud within world Jewry that has Eurasianist Jewry as supreme over the universe. In this way, it could be E. Michael Jones carrying out this same script as Dugin when he fails to condemn the heart of world Jewry (Chabad, Elders of Zion) and instead focuses on the silliness of Zionism and Jewish power in the West (which is already well known and documented). It seems Jonesovich is fulfilling Operation SIG by exposing only the Western side of world Jewry whilst completely ignoring and even defending its supreme Eurasianist elder brother, specifically through Chabad Lubavitch, which was born in Lyuabvichi of the USSR.

“…there’s Neturei Karta – it’s a completely Anti-Zionist operation that opposes the State of Israel,” Jones said in a podcast with Henry Regnery.

Jones told Peter Helland in an interview entitled “Apocalypse in Golestan” (around 9:00 mark) about the crypto-Communist New Horizons Conference that he attends with Dugin and other nefarious characters:

“I said to Rabbi Weiss (of anti-zionist Jewish sect Neturei Karta), I wish all Jews were like you. His organisation is anti-zionist.”

This admission seems to confirm that Jones is, indeed, running cover for world Jewry, specifically the Eurasianist branch, by only opposing Zionism. Jones certainly doesn’t want his readers learning that Eastern Chabad is running the Russian Federation as well as most world affairs.

In summary, it seems Jones is running cover for Eurasianist Jewry of the East while using his open criticism of Western Jewry as proof that he is based and trustworthy and not controlled opposition, as some contend (myself included). His constant shilling for the Russian and Iranian states are part of his Eurasianist sympathies, and with that, his anti-Westernism makes more sense. He never seems to differentiate between classical, Catholic-based Western Civilization and the Leftist one it has become today. Exposing Chabad would inevitably implicate Russia and other Eurasianist powers and the whole house of cards would come tumbling down, so he chooses to completely ignore it.

It could be that Jewry’s plan is to allow Western Jewry and even the state of Israel to disintegrate while they rebuild their New Khazaria in Crimea, where the one-world government could be based. That would explain why Jewry has no problem exposing Zionism and Western Jewish power. What’s more, they help expose it themselves!

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Aug. 15, 2022 Anno Domini 

I would like to thank David Duke for taking the time to reply to my query (from his Gab account) as to his why he lived in the Soviet Union and what he was doing there. But I can’t. You see, he never actually answered my question but, instead, turned it into an opportunity to shill for Vladimir Putinstein and the neo-Soviet “Russian Federation”, like the apparent obedient operative that he is.

His infantilized response was something a politician would do. He tries to set the tone early by appealing to his white nationalist audience with,

“It is also important to note that Moscow has the largest White population of any city on Earth!”

There is little, if any, evidence to back this up. When I challenged this, one of Duke’s apparent followers threw me a Wikipedia link showing how Russia was over 90 per cent “Russian”, as if “Russian” constitutes whiteness. Even a casual observer or someone who’s been to Russia knows that Russia is highly multi-ethnic, and white-skinned Russians tend to have Asiatic features, due to much Tatar, Mongol, and Central Asian race mixing over centuries of the empire’s existence (One could argue that the Russian’ Empire’s multi-ethnic character is what made it more vulnerable to the advances of revolutionary Communism—a system which feeds on division).

Putin’s brain Aleksandr Dugin, an apparent associate of David Duke and an admitted hater of whiteness even though he himself has white skin, stated in 2001 during the early formations of the Eurasian movement:

“Never in Russian history, in the history of our statehood, have we known a mono-ethnic state, a state that would be based solely on the dominance of a homogeneous ethnos … This is the basis of the philosophy of Eurasianism, that the Russians are not, say, an ethnic and racial community that has a kind of, how to say, monopoly on statehood. We also exist thanks to the alliance, thanks to the infusion of a powerful Turkic factor into our common state historical construction.”

(Turkic, sort of like the Khazars?)

There are Chinese people who have whiter skin than many Europeans, but does that make them white? If we take white to mean those of European stock, then absolutely not. And for those Slavs who have white skin with little or no Asiatic blending, they are of a different mentality than Northern Europeans and even Southern Europeans. Anyone who has had to deal with Slavs, be it personal or business, knows this. They are different. Are they “white”? Duke doesn’t seem to explain. I am not well read in the writings of Adolph Hitler, but I understand that he was not a fan of the Slavic peoples (apparently, Duke didn’t get the message from his supposed neo-Nazi controllers). There are exceptions, but in my own personal experience with Slavs, having spent considerable time in the Russian Orthodox community before my conversion to Roman Catholicism, they tend to be a brutish, simple, and chauvinistic people prone to pettiness, crime, and corruption. I doubt very much Duke would get into these details. He wouldn’t want to alienate is apparent Soviet benefactors or inform his large audience of the race reality of the Slavs to the point that they lose sympathy for Putin and Neo-Soviet Russia.

Duke drones on,

“At the same time Russia is about RUSSIANS, and Russian heritage, it has a friendly attitude to other minorities. Why is this?

It is because Russian leaders understand real politic, they know that if the Jews are able to divide the Russian empire Russia would be bankrupted and face huge problems of survival.”

No, Mr. Duke. It has a friendly attitude towards minorities because it is a multi-ethnic socialist state, which is what they are turning the West into. Russia was a multi-ethnic society even before Bolshevism came into the picture. The October Revolution only expanded on that and divided the empire further. Russia has never really had a tangible identity, and it still has none today. You cannot identify a mongrelized melting pot, and that’s why Eurasianists can only identify Russia as the “Third Rome”, “Eurasian”, and in other ridiculous terms (keep in mind here that the original Rome was largely multi-ethnic).

Duke suggests that Jews are targeting Russia today because they are somehow a bulwark against Jewry, even though Russia’s oligarchic neo-Soviet leadership is disproportionately Jewish, even though Jews never left Russia after the fake collapse of Communism in 1991, even though the Rothschilds were never thrown out of Russia and Russia’s Central Bank is a member of the Rothschild Bank of International Settlements, and even though Jewry’s central power—be it corrupt high finance or the Chabad movement—seems to be concentrated in Moscow today, even above Tel Aviv, Israel. Late Jewish-American Jack Bernstein exposed the whole charade in his pamphlets, particularly in The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel. Israel is nothing but a Soviet satellite working to undermine the West as a two-faced ally and to keep the Middle East divided for easier Russian control and expansion of its long sought after Eurasian landmass. Former Mossad asset Juval Aviv even admitted that Mossad is “an old Russian school”. Nearly every Israeli Prime Minister has had Soviet roots—all of these important facts are ignored and covered up by David Duke so that his audience remains ignorant and deceived in the lead up to the neo-Soviet Eurasian takeover of the world. He is setting up patriots to accept a world regime they will later regret accepting. But by that time, it will be too late.

Duke provides himself with an alibi, pretends not to be a total Putinist shill when he writes,

“Does Russia and Putin do enough to advance our ideology. (sic) The short answer is No. I think he needs to do more and that it will soon be time to name the Jew (but in, of course, a reasoned and factual way).”

It’s really sick that Duke strings along his audience with this nonsense. He provides no evidence that Putinist Russia is advancing our (the white) cause (Russia is already multi-ethnic). Furthermore, we know from the admissions of the Nazbolic Eurasianist, closeted homosexual Aleksandr Dugin that the Russian Federation hates white people (Dugin even admitted that Russia fuels black supremacism in the West). Of course, Duke won’t tell the truth about what Dugin really thinks. They are in apparent cahoots. Would Mr. Duke care to explain why he associates with an open national Bolshevik, Crowleyite, homosexual, West and Catholic hater, and someone fond of the Jewish Kabbalah and Freemasonry?

“…the reason the Jewish globalist world order, media, and banking establishment hates Putin and the Russian people is because: THEY KNOW HE IS THEIR ENEMY AND RUSSIA ITSELF IS VERY COGNIZANT OF JEWISH GLOBAL POWER AND THE DANGER Jewish global supremacy PRESENTS TO RUSSIA AND THE WORLD….”

Duke figures that if he repeats “Jewish global Power” enough, his case is argued. It’s amateur hour, folks. Russia’s mainstream media is as controlled and Jewish dominated as the West’s. The Western media’s criticism of Russia and Putin are superficial and short-lived—deliberately. They won’t nail him down for what he really is because the Western media has long been penetrated by the same Bolshevik Jewish elite that run RT, Pravda, TASS, etc., and they are all in on the charade. It’s like the phony dialectic between the Scottish rite masons and the Grand Orient (continental) masons. While their blows at each other might make it seem like they hate each other and are fundamentally opposed, it’s nothing more than sibling rivalry at worst. Even if we accept Duke’s denial that Putin is Jewish, he cannot answer for the disproportionate number of Jews in the current Russian oligarchy. All he can resort to is the Qanon-like nonsense that Putin is just playing along with the Jews because of a prolonged strategy for eventual overthrow.

“His (Putin’s) skills enabled him to infiltrate the coterie of the Yeltsin regime, biding his time until he became President, and then serving the true Russian interests.

He still plays the more subtle game of subverting the enemy while I believe the time has come for open challenge of the Jewish Supremacy that rules most of the world!”

This rhetoric is for children. Duke is becoming irrelevant in the patriot movement. The lengths he will go to in order to shill for Putin reach the absurd. Another example:

“THE KEY TO OUR VICTORY OF US AND THE WORLD OVER JEWISH TOTALITARIAN SUPREMACY IS OPENLY EXPOSE THE JEWISH RACIAL SUPREMACIST THREAT.

Putin IS ACTUALLY DOING THAT IN A WAY WHEN HE TALKS ABOUT DENAZIFICATION, IF NAZISM IS DEFINED BY THE MEDIA AS RACIAL TYRANNY AND RULE, JEWS ARE NAZIS. He is using their rhetoric against them.”

Wrong again, Mr. Duke. Putin is talking about deNazification because that was the narrative back in the 1940s when the Soviets “liberated” Europe from the Nazis, and why let a good narrative go to waste, right? History repeats itself. Duke uses all upper case letters, because that’s how arguments are won.

The problem with Duke is not so much his dime store anti-Judaism but his scandalous and treasonous shilling for the Eurasianists while pretending to be a white nationalist and U.S. patriot. More disturbingly, is he just and unwitting fool for accepting Russian propaganda or a deep-cover double agent given the mission to sway the Western dissident community to the side of those conspiring against them? Why was he living in Russia, what did he do there, and how did he come to be associated with Kabbalist degenerate Aleksandr Dugin?

By EIR
Jan. 17, 1986 Anno Domini

In our editorial last week, we promised our readers a “tumultuous New Year,” and the developments of the past week certainly bear that out—but not in the way that your newspaper headlines would suggest. A great sound and fury has arisen over how the United States should respond to the terrorist outrages of the closing days of 1985. But the United States should not respond directly to the provocation purportedly carried out by Libya. Something more interesting is occurring behind the scenes, for which the Libya fracas is a diversion.

Is there Libyan terrorism? You bet there is. Is it really Libya’s? Don’t bet on it.

To understand what is going on out of the public purview, two crucial factors must be added to the pic­ture: 1) the Israeli secret intelligence service, the Mos­sad, especially the Sharon wing, and 2) U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz’s promise to the Russians during the Geneva summit, that the United States would do nothing which would upset Soviet calculations prior to the 27th Congress of the Soviet Communist Party in February.

Now look at Libya: Everyone who knows anything about the Middle East, knows that the terrorism which is called Libya’s, is not only led by the East bloc but is to a large extent promoted by the. Israeli Mossad.Officials of the Palestine Liberation Organization, includ­ing Yasser Arafat, have repeatedly stressed in January that the so-called Abu Nidal organization has killed more Palestinians than it has Israelis.

Libyan terrorism and the Mossad are very similar beasts, descended from the same parent, the oligarchi­cal conspiracy of Soviet and Western operatives known as “The Trust.”

Few realize that the Israeli Mossad is commitd to enforcing Shultz’s promise to the Russians, that the United States will do nothing to rock the boat until Moscow gives the go-ahead. The Mossad is acting as a de facto guarantor of Soviet interests in the Western hemisphere. It has deep hooks into the U.S. intelligence community, as the recent espionage scandal involving Jonathan Jay Pollard demonstrated. Pollard was not simply an Israeli agent; he was a “false flag” spy for the Soviet KGB, working through a Moscow-linked net­work of Israelis grouped around former defense minister Ariel Sharon and longtime agent of “The Trust” Armand Hammer. Some in U.S. intelligence circles broke the Pollard affair, in an effort to crack the Soviet­ Mossad infiltration of American policymaking. And indeed, one aim of the Sharon-Qaddafi “Abu Nidal” offensive was to divert attention from the still poten­tially explosive Pollard affair.

To understand why the enemies of the United States wish to elicit a knee-jerk U.S. reaction against Libyan terror, one must take into account the fact that Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger decided, after the Geneva summit, that the United States should continue provid­ing for its own defense, despite Shultz’s assurances to the Russians to the contrary.

Weinberger sent a secret report to President Rea­gan, urging him to break with the unsigned SALT II treaty, in response to repeated Soviet violations of arms­ control agreements. Further, he disclosed in a public speech that the Soviets have deployed a minimum of 45 of the new SS-25 ICBMs, in violation of the SALT accords.

Both the Israeli Mossad and Shultz were anxious to plunge the United States headlong into military action against Libya—which, under current circumstances, would only deliver the entire Mediterranean into Soviet hands. Why? We are not about to publicize certain information too sensitive to be revealed, but we can offer the following perception to our readers:

1986 will indeed be the year of tumultuous strategic crises. The Russians and their assets in the Middle East, the Mediterranean, and Europe, intend to blind and de­ fang American defences during this year. The Israeli Mossad and its assets—in the Arab world and outside of it—are committed to assisting the Soviets to carry out their 1986 perspective.

The United States will have to fight this unholy alliance between the Soviet Third Rome and the Mos­sad.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Sept. 14, 2021 Anno Domini

If it weren’t insulting enough that the Trotskyite Bush administration had the audacity to call a Bolshevist piece of legislation the “Patriot Act”, the false-flag regime accepted from a hostile foreign power a perverse gift as a memorial for the 9/11 attacks.

In 2005, crypto-Jew Vladimir Putin gifted the United States of America a hideous teardrop monument—the Tear of Grief—to commemorate victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The Dadaist monument, which resembles a human vagina, was created by longtime leading Soviet artist and UNESCO favourite Zurab Tsereteli, a Georgian of possible Jewish descent. It bears the ironic slogan, “To the struggle against world terrorism”. Struggle, of course, is a Marxist descriptor, and modern terrorism itself was born in the Soviet Union under the wave of Red terror. At this year’s memorial at the monument, the Russian national anthem, which is the same as the Soviet anthem, was even played.^[1] Although Putin wasn’t on hand during the official dedication of the monument in New Jersey in 2006, he attended the groundbreaking ceremony in 2005 and delivered an uninspiring speech full of lies and misdirection and disingenuously calling for a need for unity between Russia and America against a common enemy.^[2] At the groundbreaking, Tsereteli explicitly linked the memorial (and thereby 9/11 itself) to global citizenship, echoing what George H.W. Bush expressed on Sept. 11, 1991 when he called for a “New World Order” (really, a New Socialist World Order. “Socialist” was dropped by world planners for obvious reasons).

“It is my hope that this piece and the beautiful park that will surround it will enable people from all over the world to honor the potential that lies in every world citizen to fight evil and foster goodwill,” Tsereteli said.^[3]

At this year’s memorial, Russian ambassador Anatoly Antonov conveyed a similar point (Note that this rhetoric smacks of unipolarism all the while Russia has been working hard to portray itself to Western conservative audiences as multipolar):

“The 9/11 tragedy has shown that terrorism is a common global threat. Any attempts to create isolated ‘islands of security’ in the modern inter-connected world are ephemeral and doomed to failure. The victory over terrorists can be achieved only through joint efforts of the entire international community.”^[4]

Incidentally, Antonov was a specialist in control of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons in the Soviet Ministry of Foreign Affairs and has been under multiple Western sanctions, yet he is allowed to enter the United States, act as a keynote speaker at a national monument, and say these hostile, treasonous things to the American people.

The Soviet-saturated Bush administration was all too willing to accept the gift (more a mockery than a gift) despite the Kremlin’s nearly century-long hatred and subversion of the West, its sponsorship of international and domestic terrorism, and its lies of democratization as a means of undermining the West’s protection mechanisms.

The Tear of Grief is a silver teardrop suspended between a jaggedly hollowed out 100-foot column. It’s supposed to symbolize some kind of solidarity with victims of terror around the world. This notion is such a joke given that Putin has led government-sponsored terrorism both domestically and abroad. Putin’s FSB (formerly named KGB) was caught red-handed (pun intended) setting up the Ryazan apartment bombing false flag in 2000 as a pretext to invade Chechnya (Putin made sure to bring up the Ryazan apartment bombing[false flag] in his 2005 groundbreaking address in New Jersey). The Chechen Republic is a known proving ground for Kremlin-backed Islamic terrorism. Abroad, the Kremlin has sponsored any and all sides of conflicts in nations and regions it wishes to control, mainly through the strategy of Balkanization, like the ongoing Soviet Operation SIG^[5], which supports both sides in the Middle East conflict but never enough support that any one side gains a clear and permanent victory. A recent example of Kremlin Balkanization scheming is in the Azerbaijan/Armenia conflict.^[6]

Given Russia’s history, Putin’s teardrop gift can only serve as a mockery and rubbing of salt in the wound of the American people—all enabled by the American’ people’s own government, which has long been compromised by the international Jewish communist conspiracy. Americans should view the monument for what it likely is—a symbol of Soviet conquest. What makes the monument even more grotesque is its utilitarianism and its resemblance to the human vagina. The occult underworld is obsessed with sex and obsessed erecting monuments that depict sex, especially the phallus.^[7] Since Sovietism is Judaism and Judaism is Kabbalism, is it any wonder Soviet Jews would be interested in this form of art? If the 9/11 monument in America is a giant vagina, is that supposed to mean, then, that Russia, as the dominant power (phallus), has penetrated her? It would seem fitting, given the decades-long Soviet penetration of America’s government and institutions. Russia’s usurpation of America would turn it from a dominant phallic nation, as represented in the masons’ cherished Washington Monument (an obelisk), to the dominated, now represented as a vagina of sorts (Tear of Grief, New Jersey).

It’s unclear whether Tsereteli is Jewish, but it is clear that he is well respected and accepted in the international Jewish community. He has received a Tree of Life award from the Jewish National Fund’s Greater New York Zone^[8] has dedicated several pieces to Jewish causes, including to Holocaust Inc.^[9] The same year Putin was mocking the American people with his vagina piece in New Jersey, Tsereteli had his “Holocaust” work gifted from Russia to Israel. The Kremlin dubbed it, “Russia and Israel should improve co-ordination of their efforts in the fight against terrorism, extremism and ethnic intolerance”.^[10] The event was purported to be the first time a current Russian president had visited Israel, and Tsereteli stood alongside Putin at the event in Jerusalem.

The loyal Soviet artist Tsereteli has been awarded with many state honours, including the “Hero of Socialist Labour, Order of Lenin” in 1990; the “People’s Artist of the USSR” in 1980; and, incidentally, the Order of Akhmad Kadyrov “for his personal contribution to the commemoration of the first president of the Chechen Republic” (Akhmad is the father of current Chechen president, the Putin stooge Ramzan Kadyrov). For decades he has led major Soviet projects, so he is no minor artist in the Soviet bloc. He is known to be close to Putin, which isn’t a surprise considering Putin chose him for the 9/11 memorial, a major international photo op (and mockery of the victim). Another of his sculptures depicts the Yalta conference’s iconic photo of Soviet collaborators Churchill, Roosevelt, and, of course, Josef Stalin. In typical Soviet fashion, the short Stalin’s height was altered to make him appear four inches higher than the two Western presidents.^[11] In looking at some of Tsereteli’s non-Jewish monuments, like his sculpture of Vatican II Pope John Paul II and works for Russian Orthodoxy, it made me think of all the times I have been in an Orthodox Church and seen a Jewish hexagram or all-seeing eye encased in a trinagle. Why are they there when they are not Christian symbols? Has Tsereteli, and artists like him, been subverting sacred Christian art with his Jewish symbology? I have seen these symbols in European Catholic art as well, so perhaps the same would apply in the Catholic Church—conversos and cryptos possibly blaspheming and mocking holy iconography.

Salvador Dali in Mercedes Magazine, April 2004, described Tsereteli as,

“A grand master which unites the talents of both an artist and an organizer. This doubles an energy of Zurab’s works and beginnings.”

In hindsight of the “Covid-19” scamdemic, it seems that 9/11 served as the foundation for final Bolshevist world government expansion into the West, by way of the two precedents it set for unconstitutional changes (brute force, as outlined in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion) via “emergency” powers. So it is that the Soviets and their proxies in the U.S. government sought to leave their mark at or near the crime scene—in this case, across the shore from the World Trade Center in New Jersey. It seems the more we look into the criminal conspiracy surrounding the 9/11 false flag, the more we see Soviet fingerprints. We shall continue to explore the hypothesis that 9/11 was carried out by a joint KGB/Mossad initiative to bring about what we are now finally seeing in 2021—the realization of world communism.

Notes:

1. Executive Intelligence Review, U.S., Russian Officials Express Friendship, Unity Against Terrorism in 9/11 Event at Tear of Grief Monument in New Jersey, Sept. 12, 2021 – https://larouchepub.com/pr/2021/20210912_teardrop_ceremony.html ↑
2. President of Russia Web Portal, Speech at the dedication ceremony for the memorial to the victims of the tragedy of September 11, 2001, September 16, 2005 – http://www.911monument.com/download.cfm?docName=PutinSpeech.pdf ↑
3. The Peninsula at Bayonne Harbor, Teardrop Memorial to be placed at the Peninsula at Bayonne Harbor, March 9, 2005 – https://web.archive.org/web/20120313011703/http://www.bayonnelra.com/press/03092005.pdf ↑
4. Executive Intelligence Review, U.S., Russian Officials Express Friendship, Unity Against Terrorism in 9/11 Event at Tear of Grief Monument in New Jersey, Sept. 12, 2021 – https://larouchepub.com/pr/2021/20210912_teardrop_ceremony.html ↑
5. Operation SIG Index, Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.net/operation-sig/ ↑
6. Dautheir-Villars, David and Simmons, Ann, Putin supplied Armenia with missiles, sold Azerbaijan means to shoot them down, Oct. 3-4, 2020, Wall Street Journal – https://fitzinfo.net/2020/10/07/putin-supplied-armenia-with-missles-sold-azerbaijan-means-to-shoot-them-down/ ↑
7. Marrs, Texe, Baal’s shaft and Cleopatra’s needle, Power of Prophecy, Jan. 20, 2009 – https://www.texemarrs.com/012009/baals_shaft_cleopatras_needle.htm ↑
8. Jewish National Fund Highlights from the Around the Country – http://support.jnf.org/site/PageServer?pagename=BN_Highlights&printer_friendly=1 ↑
9. Holocaust Memorial Sculpture, Moscow, Russia, 1996 – https://www.southerncostablancajewishcommunity.org/20160720memorial_russia.php ↑
10. President of Russia, Russia and Israel should improve coordination of their efforts in the fight against terrorism, extremism and ethnic intolerance, April 28, 2005 – http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/33246 ↑
11. Yeager, Carolyn, Surprise! Huge “Big Three” monument unveiled in Yalta, Crimea, Jan. 5, 2015 – https://carolynyeager.net/surprise-huge-big-three-monument-unveiled-yalta-crimea ↑

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
July 30, 2021 Anno Domini

World Jewish Congress founder Nahum Goldmann suggested in a German periodical that both the Soviet Union and the United States of America work in Israel’s interests, echoing a warning by an Israeli defector some years later.

“…both the United States and the Russians would be prepared to guarantee Israel’s safety and to send troops in her defence,” the Russian-born Zionist Goldmann was paraphrased as saying in the May, 1978 edition of the Association of Jewish Refugees in Great Britain.

The comments originated from an interview in Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung, a German daily published in Osnabrück. Although the United States and the Soviets were bitter enemies at the time, Goldmann seems to have believed that Israel was a unifier between the two nations.

Goldmann’s admission corroborates Israeli defector Jack Bernstein’s claim in his 1984 book The Life of An American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel that there was a Jewish-Soviet-orchestrated “New York-Moscow-Tel Aviv Triangle” guiding world affairs.

“The Zionist power over the U.S. Government in Washington, D.C. stems from the Zionist/Bolsheviks centered in New York City,” Bernstein wrote. “This power of the Zionist/Bolshevik Jews over the U.S. makes the New York leg of the New York/Moscow/Tel Aviv Triangle a tremendous influence over communist policies,” he goes on to say.

Incidentally, the Nazis once accused Goldmann of being a secret communist agent. What’s more, Goldmann spoke with Yugoslav communist dictator Josip Broz Tito on Middle East peace and was mourned by KGB operative Yasser Arafat of the Palestinian Liberation Organization.

“The Palestinians mourn the death of Nahum Goldmann. He was a Jewish statesman of a unique personality. He fought for justice and legitimate rights for all peoples,” Arafat lamented.

Tito told a meeting of Soviet bloc leaders in Moscow in 1967,

“I would like to inform you about the Jews. [Nahum] Goldmann from the World Jewish Congress asked me to receive him. It was a month ago. He asked me: what do you think, do you want to somehow solve this problem? I explained to him our position….”

Clearly, Goldmann himself was high up in this Soviet New York-Moscow-Tel Aviv triangle and let slip a hint of who is really in control. It’s also likely that Goldmann would have been involved in the planning of the joint Soviet-Israel Operation SIG, which is a clever ploy designed to frame the United States and Great Britian for global Jewish criminal activity. Operation SIG seems to be mounting its fulfillment, with the last legs of Western Civilization being kicked out from under us before our very eyes.