By Timothy Fitzpatrick

What explains the contradictory theological and political positions of so called traditional Catholic E. Michael Jones is the dark art of Hermetic Kabbalah.

All the things his critics accuse him of being that seem to contradict the bowtie-wearing Catholic image: a Communist, modernist defender of the Second Vatican Council, Islamophile, Eurasianist, Duginist, anti-Semite, race denier, Opus Dei member, gun grabber, Kremlin asset—can all harmoniously fit together under the context of an undercover Hermetic Kabbalist within traditional Catholic circles.

Hermetic Qabalah (Kabbalah) was developed during the Renaissance under so called Catholics Giovanni Pico della Mirandola and Marsilio Ficino (see this author’s book review Pico della Mirandola the true father of Second Vatican Council, claims author). These two subversives adapted the Jewish Kabbalah, Christianized it, and claimed that it could be used by Catholics to validate the divinity of Jesus Christ. As well, they claimed Kabbalah revealed secret truths not available in Catholic Canon. But beneath their sophistry is a heretical philosophy no true Catholic would ever accept were it presented in its raw form. That is the neo-Platonic “perennial philosophy” or Prisca Theologia, which is a form of universalism or syncretism that sees core truths in all belief systems (what Jones calls the “ultimate reality”). The Catholic Church condemns this as religious indifferentism (the heretical idea that no belief is superior to another and that all beliefs are valid ways to truth or to god[s]). It seems that the goal of this syncretism, under Eastern Kabbalistic Jewish management, is to centralize all beliefs, as it did with the social and political order under Bolshevism, to usher in their false messiah. Russian-Jewish Kabbalist rabbi Mikhail Laitman, with whom Jones debated and agreed in a 2019 interview, sees the Eurasian powers ushering in a utopic Kabbalistic new age of absolute centralized power and worship, under the guise of the redemptive messianic age.

E. Michael Jones claims that he left the anti-war hippy movement of his youth (a Marxist movement) after reading a book by Catholic monk Thomas Merton, himself a seeming perennialist.^[1] Jones’ 2020 book Logos Rising: A History of Ultimate Reality is perhaps the biggest indication that the 78-year-old Indiana-based influencer falls into the perennial school and continues the centuries-old dark legacy of kabbalistic subversion of the Catholic Church begun by Pico. In his book, Jones attempts to depersonalize the unique person of Jesus Christ (God in the flesh) and turn Him into some abstract, pantheistic notion^[2] of the ordering principle of the universe—something perennialists have done for hundreds of years with their idea of “god” (see this site’s review of Logos Rising by Ryan Augustine). While it is not incorrect to refer to Jesus Christ as the Logos (or even loosely as the light) described in the Book of St. John, it is Jones’ overemphasis and overdevelopment of this theme that takes him out of a Catholic position and places him in the Hermetic camp, or at the very least a perennialist camp. St. John does not allow any kind of depersonalization of the Messiah, nor does any other book of the New Testament. The idea of a depersonalized “Logos” (the Adam Kadmon of Ein Soph, to “traditionalist” kabbalists like Jones contemporary Alexander Dugin) is central to perennialist philosophy as well as to its more advanced form of hermetic Kabbalah in Aleister Crowley’s Thelema magik and Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (Jones’ logos book happens to depict on its front cover a golden dawn, perhaps over Renaissance Florence—once home to Pico della Mirandola). Crowley’s logos (also Dugin’s “dark logos”^[3]) helps the adept to “do what though wilt”. Jones is an associate of Crowleyite Dugin, an admitted Rene Guenonian perennialist. Jones says he first met Dugin at the Kremlin-sponsored 6^th International New Horizon Conference at Mashad, Iran in 2018. Since then, the two have cross-promoted each other. Jones, who claims “I always felt that my gaze was to the East”^[4] and who prays for the end to the “American Empire, is an ardent supporter of Dugin’s Eurasianism in the form of so called “multipolar” geopolitics, which is nothing more than a repackaged form of anti-Western Soviet Communism. Anti-Zionism is his excuse for embracing this position (see Operation SIG), as the West is just a Zionist lackey state that needs to be abolished in order to achieve world peace, according to Jones. Dugin’s worldview is almost identical to Jones’ except Dugin dresses his agenda in Eastern Orthodox/Fascist garb instead of Catholic. As a side note, Dugin’s late daughter Darya once used the pseudonym surname of Platonova, in honour of Plato. Neo-Platonism lurks behind all the Kabbalah of all these perennialists, it seems.

Jones’ longtime support of the Eurasianist agenda—the idea that the rulers of the Eurasian landmass have an inherit and even messianic right to rule over the rest of the planet—fits into a perennialist worldview, where borders and races are erased to make way for the universal Soviet man (global Communism) who follows a universal religion of religions. Jones glowingly claims God is bringing about a “Eurasianist…New World Order”.^[5] This perennialism also explains, to a large degree, Jones’ absurd denial of race. If Jones were smart politically, he would back off this position, but he can’t help himself, which seems to suggest he is more than just an opportunistic perennialist. He must be an ideological subverter (and, yes, money factors in as well, as Jones allegedly is a millionaire). Then again, it could merely be his narcissism seeping through on this issue (they can never be wrong). In order to harmonize the world under centralized governance, you have to create the borderless, raceless Soviet man. Jones also isn’t very smart when he makes the implausible assertion that Communism and China were never a threat, so he relies on the ignorance of his audience (narcissists are always smarter than everyone else). Communism becomes a guarantor of his perennialist worldview, for only a collectivist society under a collectivist religion can achieve utopia. He must defend Communism, although couched in vague terms like “solidarism” and “multipolarism”, at all costs if his fellow perennialists are to reach the apex of civilization. We now know that materialistic atheism was never the ultimate goal of the Soviet system but only a step. To institute Kabbalah globally, you have to first destroy the existing order, which is Christianity. To destroy Christianity, you have to implement a temporal phase of anti-religionism but also a permanent phase of collectivism.

“Russia will become the capital of Kabbalah,” writes Laitman. “Marxism-Leninism prepared us for Kabbalah.”^[6]

Showing the Eastern Jewishness of Communism presents a problem for perennialists like Jones. This is why he completely ignores Chabad Lubavitch (the most powerful, kabbalistic, Soviet-derivec Jewish organization in the world)^[7] and instead tries to separate the two and seemingly neutralize them individually. To achieve this, Jones instills in the reader the idea that the threat of Communism is long past and was merely a “category of the mind” and that the Jewish question is really only about Zionism or Western capitalist liberal Jewry. This decouples real Jewry (based in the East) from Communism and, simultaneously, Russia from Jewry. It also leaves the door open for “dialogue” with so called anti-Zionist Jews like Neturei Karta, with whom Jones is chummy. Chabad is also arguably anti-Zionist at its core.

The reader of Jones might argue that Jones attacks Jewry at a fundamental level (namely in their rejection of Christ, which was the theme of The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History). To that I would say that it is more obfuscation, for the different schools of Judaism (Eastern Hasidism vs. Western Talmudic/Zionism) will oppose each another, even to the point of condemnation. These so called Christian Kabbalists can even say anti-Semitic things, for it is the Jew who misinterpreted the Kabbalah, not the learned like the Pico Della Mirandolas, Ficinos, and Joneses of the world. As it is, however, Jones never really goes deep in his critiques of the Talmud (which he doesn’t even mention all that much), and especially not the Kabbalah. He keeps the reader focused on Zionism and the culture warring coming from Jews of the Western Left. He keeps his audience fixated on general, simpleton issues like abortion, feminism, pornography, and war, which are easy to pin exclusively on the West using highly controlled narratives. He knows that as long as he says the word “Jew” enough, his audience will applaud him and not notice the glaring holes and contradictions in his positions or the deeper subjects he ignores. Jones dualistic relationship with Jewry corresponds with Eurasianism founder Yakov Bromberg’s dualism between Eastern Jewry’s Hasidic orientalism that he championed against Western Jewry’s Talmudic-capitalist-liberalism. Dugin seems to have merely repackaged Bromberg’s concept of a Jewish-based Eurasianism and, in turn, Jones has internalized Dugin’s Eurasianism and repackaged it in Catholic dressing. Therefore, Jones’ so-called anti-Semitism is merely selective and strategic, with kabbalistic syncretism as its goal.

Jones’ support for the obviously error-ridden Second Vatican Council appears to be another perennialist-based position. The conciliar errors are all about fostering acceptance of all faiths as equally valid; thereby, preparing the world for acceptance of the false Christ world leader. Jones must defend this robber council above all else, even if he has to attack the traditional Latin mass itself. Jones attacking sedevacantism and the SSPX is one thing, for they are technically schismatic, but for him to attack the Latin mass in general makes no sense from a Catholic point of view. What does make sense is that Jones is not actually Catholic and knows the threat the TLM poses in attempting to undo Vatican 2 prescriptions and restore the Church. The TLM strengthens the idea of one, true faith, tradition, a knowable and personal messiah, and exclusivity; therefore, Jones must deconstruct the TLM and promote the V2 mass in order to prevent any hindrance to the agenda. That’s what Vatican 2-inspired clown masses are all about—to merge Catholicism with every other belief and make a mockery of Catholicism’s uniqueness. These snakes are preparing us for the anti-Christ one-world syncretic religious system, which will accompany a form of global Communism led by Jewish orientalists.

Now that we understand that Jones’ goal is religious pluralism, we can easily understand his championing of Islam and horrendous Islamic regimes like Iran. But his Islamophilic position serves another purpose. Islam is one of the most effective instruments of direct revolutionary terrorism with which to destabilize non-Communist nations in preparation for global collectivism. Jones can declare “Allahu akbar!” with no reservations, as he did with fellow Islamic Communist Kevin Barrett, and have no problem calling himself Catholic.^[8] See this site’s index on the close association between Islam and Marxist revolutionary terrorism.

The “Catholic” cult Opus Dei was started by a man named Josemaría Escrivá, who is believed to have been a Kabbalist^[9]. Opus Dei also has connections to the Communist world, especially Communist influence networks and their operatives posing as traditional Catholics. Jones has denied being a member of this cult, but “the work”, like Freemasonry, instructs its members to obscure their membership from the public. Jones’ overrepresented associations with Opus Dei are well known.^[10]

To finish off any remaining resistance to the New World Socialist Order agenda, the right of the citizenry to bear arms must be removed. E. Michael Jones is all for this. He seems to use his Soviet-based anti-war, anti-U.S. imperialism agenda to validate being anti-gun. His audience should not be fooled by this, though. It makes no sense from a truly Catholic point of view. Jones knows that in order to create the socialist Soviet utopia, individual arms possession must be eliminated in order to create a smoother transition from the free world to absolute anti-Christ collectivism.

Notes:

1. The Engaged Contemplative Spirituality of Thomas Merton, Issue 4, 2017, Beshara Magazine – https://besharamagazine.org/metaphysics-spirituality/thomas-merton-engaged-contemplative-spirituality/ ↑
2. Augustine, Ryan, Logos Rising Book Review Chapter Notes, Oct. 3, 2023 – https://fitzinfo.net/forum/topic/logos-rising-book-review-chapter-notes/ ↑
3. Kazachkin, Andrey, Dugin’s ‘dark logos’ sponsored by Russian Orthodox Church, Jan. 6, 2023 – https://fitzinfo.net/forum/topic/dugins-dark-logos-sponsored-by-russian-orthodox-church/ ↑
4. “I never had that identification with America. I always felt that my gaze was to the East.” —E. Michael Jones (54:07 mark-Guillermo Vásquez Interviews E. Michael Jones: What Is Identity?) – https://player.fm/series/culture-wars-podcast/guillermo-vasquez-interviews-e-michael-jones-what-is-identity ↑
5. Jones, Eugene Michael, Who Is destroying our civilization?, Interview – https://odysee.com/@Fitzinfo:c/Screen-Recording-2026-10-02-at-21.07.14:4 ↑
6. Laitman, Michael, ‘Russia will become the capital of Kabbalah…Marxism-Leninism prepared us for Kabbalah’: rabbi Michael Laitman, Feb. 24, 2003, IZ – https://fitzinfo.net/2024/02/22/russia-will-become-the-capital-of-kabbalah-rabbi-michael-laitman/ ↑
7. Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Most powerful Jewish organization in world Chabad completely absent from E. Michael Jones’ writings, The Fitzpatrick Informer, Jan. 28, 2023 – https://fitzinfo.net/2023/01/28/most-powerful-jewish-organization-in-world-chabad-completely-absent-from-e-michael-jones-writings/ ↑
8. Odysee – https://odysee.com/@Fitzinfo:c/Jones-and-Barrett-praise-allah:8 ↑
9. Carlos de Borbon, Alfonso, Opus Judei, Orion Publications, 1994 – http://www.reductio.net/OpusJudei-Index.html ↑
10. Engel, Randy, All the Men Behind the Opus Dei Curtain – https://newengelpublishing.com/all-the-men-behind-the-opus-dei-curtain/ ↑

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
October 10, 2026 Anno Domini

On 4 November 2011, Eurasianists gathered in Rostov-on-don, Russia before marching on Ukraine with an icon of the Virgin Mary and shouting imperialist slogans.

“Russians, forward!”, “Glory to the Empire! “Russian, get up!”, “Russian means sober!”, the 200 members of the International Eurasian Movement’s youth wing shouted as the Marian icon Our Lady of Kazan led the “imperial run”  into Ukraine’s Crimea region—a highly symbolic display of theatrics by a movement started by neo Bolshevik and Kremlin strategist Alexander Dugin.

“The purpose of the event was the symbolic transfer of three imperial symbols—the flag of the Russian Empire, the Victory Banner, and the Eurasian Banner to the territory of Ukraine,” read a statement on the Eurasian group’s portal rossia3.ru.

The Eurasian Youth Union (ESM) performs the march, ‘For the Russian Empire’, every year on November 4, which happens to fall on a day before the beginning of the Feast of the Immaculate Conception in the Catholic Church calendar. The inclusion of the Blessed Virgin Mary with the flags of the Eurasian group is ironic at best, blasphemous at worst, as the Eurasian flag symbol of an eight-pointed star is based on chaos magic, the Victory Flag of Russia includes the Soviet hammer and sickle, and the Russian Federation flag represents a secretly Communist nation entirely hostile to Catholicism and the free world. The Kabbalist perennialist Dugin is also openly anti-Catholic and anti-Western.

“Both they (New World Order) and we (Eurasians) want to deprive you of your Catholicism; Orthodoxy…is much closer to what we call paganism.”

The icon of Our Lady of Kazan is an Eastern Orthodox icon. The original went missing in 1917, the same year as the Bolshevik Revolution and the same year as the alleged first apparition of Our Lady of Fatima in Portugal. The exact demise of the original icon is disputed, with some believing that the “copy” that ended up in the hands of the Vatican—before a short stint at the Fatima shrine until 1993—was actually the 16th century original. The Vatican under Pope John Paul II, in an apparent act of ecumenism, eventually returned the Kazan icon to the Russian Orthodox Church in 2004, with Pope John Paul II showing it to Russian President Vladimir Putin during a 2003 visit to the Vatican.

The stunt by the ECM was not only symbolic of Russia’s ongoing neo-Soviet imperial objectives, it was also symbolic of the Russian state’s ongoing exploitation of Fatima to align Western conservatives, especially Catholics, with its imperial objectives, now disguised as Eurasianism or multipolarism. Russian propaganda panders to Fatimist Catholics who believe that Russia was or will soon be consecrated to “the immaculate heart of Mary” and thus Russia’s supposed turn to conservatism, nationalism, and Christianity represents some kind of messianism. The inclusion of Christian icons in the Eurasianist movement march into Ukraine is also sinister considering the resolution to establish the neo-Soviet Donetsk and Luhansk’s Peoples republics was first drafted by the Russian Federation Communist Party (CPRF), the official “opposition” to Putin’s dominant United Russia Party. Three years after the ECM march into Ukraine and after Putin’s United Russia adopted the resolution of the so called opposition party CPRF, the Russian Federation would invade Eastern Ukraine for real.

Papal acquiescing to the hostile neo-Soviet regime in Moscow is nothing new to the Vatican. In 2022, Pope Francis hosted for the first time ever the Eurasian Jewish and World Jewish congresses in the Apostolic Palace. (See more at Communism and the Vatican index)

Putin stated,

“They professed Judaism in the Kaganate, which was on the bregs of Azov and Black seas. It’s also ours; it’s us, which Russian people absorbed all this in ourselves. It’s a natural development.“

Two video sources:

Youtube (subtitles need to be selected under CC and switched to English)

Backup: Odysee (subtitles automatic)

For more, see the New Khazaria index.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Sept. 16, 2023 Anno Domini

A couple of months ago, a 79-year-old FBI double agent and American traitor was found dead in his prison cell of 21 years.

Robert Hannsen, a devotee of a powerful pseudo conservative cult inside the Catholic Church known as Opus Dei, had ended up in his daily 23-hour solitary confinement by betraying his country for a bag of silver from the KGB. He betrayed the FBI and also his Catholic wife, not only by leading a double life as a KGB spy but also by allowing his friend to watch him and his wife having sex.[i]

Ironically, the traitor had been known to accuse the Russians of being Godless, though he was serving their interests. Supposedly, this Godlessness is what provoked the Opus Dei to eventually set up shop in the “former” Soviet Union some five years after Hanssen initially was imprisoned. The corrupt KGB-installed Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill, agent “Mikhailov”, was more than happy to welcome to new “Catholic” outreach, which set up the Opus Dei Centre in Moscow on June 26, 2007.

“The vice president of the Department of Foreign Ecclesial Affairs of the Patriarchate of Moscow, Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin, welcomed the personal prelature of Opus Dei, which recently opened a community in Russia, and said its energy and fidelity ‘to Christian ideals are worthy of great respect’… The vicar for Opus Dei in Moscow, Father Jose Antonio Senovilla Garcia, said his community has gone to Russia ‘to encourage the people to be good orthodox believers, to find God in their daily lives and to help others’.”[ii]

If the Moscow Patriarchate is OK with the Dei’s presence in Russia, then so is the Kremlin, then so is the KGB, then so is the Communist International (COMINTERN); meanwhile, authentic Catholic teaching is considered hostile to the Eurasian-oriented crypto Soviet state.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s “brain” and prophet Aleksandr Dugin, a middle aged occultist managing controlled opposition “conservatives” in Western nations has admitted the real neo-Soviet and fiercely anti-Catholic views of the Kremlin and the Communist International. However, these admissions can only be found on Russian language sites.

“Destroy Catholicism from within, strengthen Freemasonry.[iii] Both they (New World Order) and we (Eurasians) want to deprive you of your Catholicism; Orthodoxy…is much closer to what we call paganism.[iv] I think the best thing in Polish history is the Jewish tradition in small towns in eastern Poland. Actually, I am interested in everything that was anti-Catholic in Poland: Polish freemasons and occultists, Jan Potocki and Hoene-Wroński, Mienżyński and Dzerzhinsky … They all chose the Eurasian path.[v]”

If Dugin’s views on Catholicism are an indication of the Kremlin’s, then we can be certain that the neo-Soviet state’s permission of Catholic churches in its country are for show and are closely monitored for compliance with the state agenda—as it is also with the Russian Orthodox Church and all other religions, especially Islam.

Before Opus Dei officially entered Russia, all the way back in 1991—the year the Soviets successfully fooled the world that Soviet Communism had collapsed, one Father Myron Effing of Evansville, Indiana (E. Michael Jones’ home state) had brought his Catholic mission to the Red Empire but on the opposite end of the country in the geopolitically significant city of Vladivostok. It shares borders with China, Japan, and North Korea. Although Effing’s Vlad mission (Mary Mother of God Mission Society) doesn’t overtly claim affiliation with the cult, Opus Dei made a rather interesting prediction in 2011.

“…but it is for God first of all, who has brought us to that beloved country, Russia, through St Josemaria’s prayers. How much he prayed for your country, how much he prayed for you! In union with his regard, I am sure we will reach from St Petersburgh to Vladivostok, doing a wonderful apostolate which will bring forth not only Numerary Assistants but Numeraries, Associates, and Supernumeraries, lots of them….”[vi]

Why does Opus Dei consider Russia beloved? Most of its authentic Christians were murdered off during the Red Terror.

In a November 1, 2012 newsletter put out by Effing and his Vlad Mission, a reference was made to Opus Dei which may suggest an affiliation. During the mission’s 16^th annual Far Eastern Catholic Youth Conference, Effing describes an activity where participants were to choose a saint to study and promote for a week.

“The ‘green’ group got St. Josemaria Escriva, the founder of Opus Dei”.[vii]

Effing joins the modernists in their declaration for both Escriva and Pope John Paul II as saints. This isn’t really surprising when you consider that Effing utilizes the highly popular Protestant “Alpha Course” in his mission. Is he an ecumenist in the spirit of Vatican II or is the Alpha covertly Catholic somehow?

Father Effing happens to have as a member of his Vlad Mission the daughter-in-law of pro-Kremlin author and Culture Wars editor Eugene Michael Jones of South Bend Indiana (an Opus Dei centre). Anna Gafurova Jones was the Mission’s first parish organist and choir director. Her mother, Ludmilla Rakhmanova, is a charter member of the mission’s choir and serves as professor of dramatics at The Far Eastern Art Institute in Vladivostok.

“Ludmilla is the director of all operas produced in Vladivostok, a position in which she has worked at one time or another with most of the classical musicians in the Russian Far East….”

It’s unclear how one of E. Michael Jones’ sons would’ve met a Russka from Russia’s far East. But it seems fitting that such a thing should happen given Jones’ unwavering support for the Kremlin and its neo-Soviet satellites, especially Iran, whom Jones can’t seem to love and promote enough.

Although Russia pretends that it has dropped Communism—something which Father Effing seems to believe or at least echo, it maintains strict control over academia, religion, and especially Western influence. It’s difficult to imagine all Catholic Churches in Russia operating without state approval. “So long as no one ventures off the path we have laid out, you may have a presence here,” it seems. This is how it is in Red China, where the state even appoints its own “Catholic” bishops without consent from the Vatican. Catholic presence in Russia helps create the illusion that it is an open society and has, indeed, parted with its Soviet ways. More importantly, perhaps, is that it allows the neo-Soviets easier access to the Church and a means by which to spread its errors right into the heart of the Church and in Catholic nations.

If Catholic presence in Russia is strictly controlled by the crypto-Soviet regime, then what does that say of Opus Dei’s presence there?

According to a mysterious book called Opus Judei published in Colombia in 2000, Opus Dei is a subversive Judeo-masonic organization bent on destroying the Catholic Church from within.[viii] This incredible book seems to be legitimate, as it provides many details which only an insider would seem to have and comes to logical conclusions (to corroborate its conclusions, see my dossier on Opus Dei). If you haven’t seen my dossier on E. Michael Jones, which suggests that he is chasing the same Judeo-masonic-Bolshevist goals as Opus Dei, please browse through it. While Opus Dei uses the front as a traditional, conservative Catholic organization, Jones uses the front of anti-Judaism. However, when you dissect the Jones character enough, you realize that he is actually only anti-Zionist and doesn’t seem to oppose the Kabbalistic and perennialist elements of the Christ-denying cult. He seems to be using anti-Judaism to appeal to his traditional Catholic audience so that he can then secretly inject his Marxist, Russia-is-the-saviour poison into them. Incidentally, Jones is a favourite among the schismatic Eastern Orthodox, like with Estonian Monk Seraphim. Iranian convert to Eastern Orthodoxy Roosh V (Daryush Valizadeh) credits Jones with his conversion. Strange that a so called traditional Catholic is inspiring others to convert to Eastern Orthodoxy—the dominant church in the “former” Communist countries of Eastern Europe and Russia.

Jones has publicly denied being a member of Opus Dei; however, according to the above mentioned Opus Judei book, members—much like Freemasons—tend to obfuscate their membership in order to deceive the public.

“Lieutenant General Fernando Rodrigo Cifuentes made the following statements when referring to Opus Dei: ‘As a military man, I consider the high commitments that the military man has contracted with the nation to be totally in conflict with any other commitments that are undoubtedly contracted by accepting the regulations of a secret association, since its work of recruitment and action is secret.’ (35) Colonel Antonio Sánchez Cámara said: ‘Many, many members of Opus Dei, if asked directly, deny their membership. Opus Dei is something closed, and I like open spaces.’”[ix]

Jones’ publishing company, Fidelity Press, shares some suspicious characteristics with Opus Dei. As it happens, “fidelity” is a significant word in the Opus Dei cult.

“After proselytism and recruitment, come the VOWS, which at first are taken for one year and renewed for five—the so-called “Oblation”; the next step is the juridical incorporation into the Work, which is called “Fidelity”—the culmination of the process of depersonalization.”[x]

On top of that, Jones has as his logo for his Fidelity Press an encircled cross with what appears to be a rose emerging from behind it. This is exactly the Opus Dei’s main symbol. The Opus Judei author claims the rose and empty cross (as opposed to a proper Catholic crucifix) are Kabbalistic in meaning (perhaps also Rosicrucian in origin?).

“The symbol of the rose is a very important part of the Hebrew Kabbalistic tradition. (99) Already in the psalms and in the Jewish prophetic poems, the red rose and the white rose personify the punished and purified bodies of Israel. But in the Kabbalah it goes even further on the path of meanings. The Tree, sephirotic, divided into three vertical columns, has the central one precisely under the invocation of the rose, which in this way restores and balances the rigorous and severe part of creation -left- with its clement and merciful side -right-.”[xi]

“The members of Opus Dei carry, in their pockets, crosses without the body of Christ. Of the crucified Son of God, the Work accepts and recognizes as its own only an empty wooden cross. The camouflaged reasons given by Escrivá are that the naked bodies of Jesus Christ are usually badly made and repugnant. The crucifix is the symbol of faith. The wood, the Calvary where the Jews exercised their deicide.

It is a custom and compulsory rule that in every center or house of Opus Dei “there is a black cross without Christ, which will be decorated twice a year. (102) These heterodox practices have been censured as well as their secrecy, as their thumb is placed on their lips.

If to the bare cross we add the rose we have the rose-cross. Kabbalistic alchemy could not be more explicit and perfect.”[xii]

(These are just some of Jones’ connections to Opus Judei. See more in Randy Engel’s article All the men behind the Opus Dei curtain.)

One might conclude from Engel’s article that both Michael Voris of Church Militant (also pro-Kremlin) and Eugene Michael Jones of Fidelity Press couldn’t possibly both be Opus Dei members since they are feuding with each other over Jones supposedly breaking the confessional seal by exposing Voris’ homosexual past. Again, we turn to Opus Judei for a possible answer.

“Judas the Iscariot has gone down in history not because of his possible virtues as an apostle of Jesus Christ, but because of the secret denunciation he made of his Master that led to the arrest of the Messiah. In such a compact and hermetic circle as Opus Dei is, everyone wants to be an informer, a public and private accuser, a snitch, a confidant of their own closest brothers and sisters. There are various reasons for this, including the fact that informing on the truth in Opus Dei is a practice and a “virtue” so that the followers always live in an atmosphere of mutual and reciprocal distrust, fear, insecurity and isolation, all of which are extremely important for keeping the sect member in chains, in a permanent manner.

Opus Dei pays careful attention to what it calls constant and persistent spiritual direction, which binds and marks each and every one of its members. This is complemented, on a weekly basis, by what it calls “sharing of confidences”, which helps to configure a rigid hierarchical-spiritual order.

On the other hand, the denunciation of the brother by the brother, the embarrassment and shame of being singled out by one’s nearest neighbor, is a rule and an obligation laid down in the statutes and regulations of the Work itself. It is a common and habitual practice, fomented, encouraged and praised by those in charge of the organization.

…

But if sharing of confidences can be disturbing, no less so is public denouncement, the evidence in which they must also, weekly, leave each other, like Judas, but in this case the reward is not thirty denarii of silver, but holiness and heaven in eternity. Public accusation and repression is an unavoidable and inexcusable duty, as laid down in the very Constitutions of Opus Dei which, in article 270, stipulates that ‘The numerary members and the Oblates will meet every week for the brief circle where defects are corrected, where the means of apostolate are proposed and where everything that can guide our spirit and our specific action is dealt with in a familiar way’. Every member must submit or be called to order.”[xiii]

During his time with the FBI and as an Opus Dei member, traitor Robert Hannsen spent time in Gary, Indiana and Chicago, Illinois—just a stone’s throw from Eugene Michael Jones in South Bend. Because the mid-West is a hotbed of Opus Dei activity, one wonders if these two characters ever crossed paths while shilling for the Kremlin and possibly working for Opus Dei.

Notes:

[i] Leonard, Tom, The sordid truth of FBI mole Robert Hanssen’s private perversions… how the Soviet spy let a friend secretly watch him and his wife having SEX – all while he was betraying his country, Daily Mail, June 7, 2023 – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12170269/How-Soviet-spy-FBI-agent-Robert-Hanssen-invited-friend-watch-wife-having-SEX.html

[ii] Catholic News Agency, Patriarchate of Moscow welcomes Opus Dei presence in Russia, Dec. 18, 2007 – https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/11307/patriarchate-of-moscow-welcomes-opus-dei-presence-in-russia

[iii] Radio Spada, Reflections on some words by A. Dugin, April 19, 2023 – https://www.radiospada.org/2023/04/distruggere-il-cattolicesimo-dallinterno-rafforzare-la-massoneria-riflessioni-su-alcune-parole-di-a-dugin/

[iv] Fronda, Alexander Dugin: I am waiting for Ivan the Terrible, March 1998 – https://www.fronda.pl/a/aleksander-dugin-czekam-na-iwana-groznego,45653.html

[v] ibid

[vi] Echevarria, Javier, “The driving force for the apostolic work”, Opus Dei, Nov. 29, 2011 – https://opusdei.org/en-ca/article/the-driving-force-for-the-apostolic-work/

[vii] Vladivostok Sunrise, Issue Number One Hundred Eight, November 1, 2012, pg. 4

[viii] Opus Judei, 2000, Bogota, Columbia – http://www.reductio.net/OpusJudei-Index.html

[ix] Ibid, Ch. 1, part 3

[x] Ibid, Ch. 1, part 7

[xi] Ibid, Ch. 3, part 4

[xii] Ibid

[xiii] Ibid, Ch. 1, part 14

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 30, 2023 Anno Domini

Two of the biggest questions I have about that manufactured disinformation operator Adam Green of Know More News is how he got in and out of Israel unscathed and why a high-profile 9/11 truther bothered to go to Green’s home and do several interviews with him.

At the time, 2018 and prior, Green didn’t have a large following. He is educated in business administration, worked as a grunt at ViaSat, and has very limited historical or theological knowledge, much less conspiracy research knowledge (his bait is your basic Leftist anti-Zionism). So why would the supposed king of 9/11 research Christopher Bollyn (aka Kinky Balloon, according to the late Michael Collins Piper) bother with a crummy little Youtuber like Adam Green? He’s appeared on CNN^[1], been interviewed by Haaretz^[2], and attended many lectures at Kremlin-backed conferences around the world talking about the Anglo-Israeli orchestration of the 9/11 attacks. Why on Earth would Bollyn care about some wannabe Youtube star like Green? Green is not unique or special. He just interviews random people (but how random was Bollyn?) and reads on video what others have researched or written, which is appealing to younger people who don’t like reading and would rather watch.

The only reasonable conclusion one could come to is that Bollyn is “giving a rub” to Green. No, I am not talking about Bollyn’s sexual proclivities, although those can’t be ruled out. What I am talking about is the figurative passing of the torch. Once again, we turn to the deceptive world of professional wrestling to understand real world deception:

*rub

“Helping a less popular wrestler get over by associating them with a more prominent or popular wrestler.”^[3]

“Get over” means to be accepted by the crowd and potentially become popular. Green is the less popular disinfo artist being associated with a much more prominent one in Bollyn. Apparently, the rub Alex Jones gave to Green didn’t work very well, which is why Green left the Infowars fold? So if Bollyn and Green are the wrestlers, who is the promoter? Indications point to the East, as I suggested in Christopher Bollyn gatekeeping 9/11 truth on behalf of Moscow? If you haven’t read this article yet, please do so before reading on here.

Could it be that Bollyn, who not only lived in Israel working in the Marxist Kibbutz system but also married an Eastern European-derived Israeli woman (Bosmat Merimsky) who worked in the Israeli defense services, provided Green the connection with which he could pass in and out of Israel with relative ease? Green was publicly anti-Zionist at the time he went to Israel (and just happened to bump into fellow anti-Zionist and Kremlin shill Jake Morphonios-on Russian TV/ a contributor to pro-Kremlin Iranian site).^[4] You would think the Israeli authorities, who monitor this stuff like hawks, would have roughed up the gangly hipster, at least a little bit. But as far as we can tell from the videos Green posted, nothing at all happened to him or Morphonios. It’s possible Green’s “former” employer Viasat could’ve provided help with Green’s access to Israel, as ViaSat is sponsored by the Israeli government^[5], but for that to be possible, it seems Green would have to have been more than just a grunt working in an IT depot. But who knows. Bottom line, it’s highly suspicious that a publicly anti-Zionist figure is traversing Zion with ease.

Bollyn seems to be more connected then he lets on. Add to the list of the Communist connections outlined in my first article on Bollyn (linked above), I came across more in Communist Venezuela. I happen to have spent some time in that country and know with certainty that it is a Communist country^[6], despite Kremlin narratives to contrary (you will find much of the alt media championing Venezuela as an anti-globalist freedom fighter, which is typical Commie rhetoric).

In February 2006, Bollyn claims that the late American Free Press publisher Willis Carto assigned him to cover a story in the “Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela” (Simon Bolivar was a freemason, Soviet-styled “liberator”, much like Che Guevara) and petition dictator Hugo Chavez for support for the AFP. Brewing in the background at this time, Michael Collins Piper at American Free Press grew suspicious of Bollyn and seemed to see him as some kind of Israeli operative that was sent to the newspaper as a plant. Piper suspects that Bollyn was trailing him all the way in Mexico, long before they officially met. Long story short, Bollyn was fired by AFP—along with Kremlin asset Raphael M. Johnson (currently writes for such shill sites as Russia Insider)—and then retaliated by accusing AFP of being a Zionist operation (via the Mark Lane angle) and used stunts (staging his own arrest by police) to try and hijack AFP’s audience for his own gain—a series of events that tend to confirm Piper’s suspicions that indeed Bollyn was an Israeli operator. It seems Bollyn was there to prevent AFP and/or Piper from unearthing too much truth, or just to cause dissension and infighting. Bollyn then began feuds with others in the patriot movement, including the late Victor Thorn.^[7] The demoralizing thing about the feud between Bollyn, Piper, Hufschmid, Daryl Bradford Smith, and WingTV was that they all seemed to have Leftist, pro-Kremlin leanings and espoused mainly generic anti-Zionist viewpoints (see The Kremlin directs the anti-Zionist movement on behalf of Israel).

Can anyone see the parallels with Adam Green, first attaching himself to Infowars, leaving it, then accusing it of being a Zionist operation? Infowars is no doubt a Kremlin-Israeli sponsored outfit, but the parallel remains.

“At the time, I was in Europe covering the Ernst Zundel trial in Mannheim and had made excellent contacts with Lebanese and Syrian leaders at the Axis of Peace conference in Brussels,” Bollyn says. This was in late 2005, before his Venezuela excursion.^[8]

The Axis For Peace conference has all the hallmarks of a KGB operation. Of course, we know the “peace movement” is a Soviet front to ultimately promote Western disarmament for greater ease of Communist victory over the world. The Conference, which listed Bollyn as a panelist^[9], was sponsored by Russia Today, Al Jazeera, Tele Sur (Venezuela state media) and others (while in Venezuela myself, I remember watching a documentary on Tele Sur called Painful Deceptions, which I learned years later was the work of Bollyn associate Eric Hufschmidt. It was another typical Soviet-styled 9/11 bait documentary—blaming the West for 9/11 and some Zionist elements thrown in to make it seem legitimate. Evidently, the Bollyn did get through to the Venezuelan government, at least in as far as getting his buddy Hufschmid’s documentary televised). Most of the other panelists and presenters at the conference were of Marxist, U.N., and/or Islamic persuasions, much like sister conferences like the Duginist New Horizons conference of Iran that our resident Vatican II shill E. Michael Jones is known for attending.

The conference’s final declaration stated,

“We salute the mediation of Russia who stands by the application of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, and the presumption of innocence in international relations. We call upon the UN General Assembly to support Russia’s efforts in favor of the re-establishment of a multilateral dialogue; to support its strong stance against financing terrorism, double standards in international politics and the interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states.”^[10]

It might as well have called for Dugin’s multi-polar world order cry with Putin as the peacemaker.

The most notable figure at Axis for Peace was former aide to the Soviet Ministry of Defense General Leonid Ivashov, who was involved in the writing of Aleksandr Dugin’s 1997 Eurasianist propaganda piece Foundations of Geopolitics.^[11] Also in attendance was KGB operative Yasser Arafat’s advisor Ahmad Tibi. Interestingly, Lyndon LaRouche’s wife Helga Zepp-LaRouche was there, too. You would think at some point in all of Bollyn’s conferencing around the world that he would have crossed paths with Dugin himself.

Back to Bollyn’s Venezuela trip, he used it as a chance to shill for the Latino-Soviet regime, defending the overweight hillbilly Chavez (locals told me how sounded like a hillbilly anytime he spoke), condemning the U.S. for unjustly vilifying the Bolivarian government, and glorifying life in the socialist hellhole.^[12]

“Hundreds of thousands of poor Americans in five Northeastern states have been on the receiving end of Venezuela ‘s generosity. This winter alone, hundreds of thousands of low-income Americans from Pennsylvania and New York to Maine and Vermont have received more than 25 million gallons of subsidized heating oil for their homes.” Bollyn wrote.^[13]

In the first in his series about Venezuela, Bollyn penned the letter from Margarita Island,^[14] which is a tourist destination in Venezuela. You have to wonder if Bollyn was ever shown the shanties and absolute squalor that dominates Venezuela. Or maybe he was but chose to ignore it for the good of the Mother Russia.

Notes:

1. CNN, Paula Zahn Now, Jan. 23, 2007 – https://www.bitchute.com/video/wrPmKPCtXSH5/ ↑
2. Cohen, Nussbaum Debra, 9/11 Truther’s Controversial Speech at Hipster Brooklyn Bastion Draws Protesters, Police, Sept. 9, 2016, Haaretz – https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/americas/2016-09-09/ty-article/9-11-truthers-controversial-speech-at-hipster-bastion-draws-protesters-nypd/0000017f-e7fe-df2c-a1ff-ffffeebb0000 ↑
3. Glossary of professional wrestling terms – Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_professional_wrestling_terms ↑
4. Adam Green and Jake Morphonios In Jerusalem, Will they Enter Gaza?, Grassroots United911—Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHyypOxjajM ↑
5. De Selding, Peter B., Viasat & Israel, rebuffed by ITU in October, renew case for in-service-deadline extension for Viasat-3 EMEA, Space Intel Report, March 15, 2022 – https://www.spaceintelreport.com/viasat-israel-rebuffed-by-itu-in-october-renew-case-for-in-service-deadline-extension-for-viasat-3-emea/ ↑
6. Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Venezuela is a Commie hellhole, Fitzpatrick Informer, July 11, 2019 – https://fitzinfo.net/2019/07/11/venezuela-is-a-commie-hell-hole/ ↑
7. Wing TV, Christopher Bollyn Arrest: Man or Mouse?, WING TV, June 2008 – https://web.archive.org/web/20100430195828/http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/bollyn.html ↑
8. Bollyn, Christopher, Christopher Bollyn Responds to Michael Piper’s Lies About Willis Carto’s “Chavez Project”, 29 November 2006, Huge Questions – http://www.hugequestions.com/Eric/TFC/Bollyn/BollynResponseToPiperNov2006.html ↑
9. Panelists, Axis For Peace 2005 – https://web.archive.org/web/20120419015908/http://www.axisforpeace.net/rubrique41.html ↑
10. Final Declaration, Axis For Peace 2005 – https://web.archive.org/web/20120622104516/http://www.axisforpeace.net/article681.html ↑
11. Leonid Ivashov, Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonid_Ivashov ↑
12. Bollyn, Christopher, Chavez influence growing, American Free Press, Jan. 7, 2006 – https://www.americanfreepress.net/html/chavez_influence_growing.html ↑
13. Bollyn, Christopher, Letter from Venezuela, American Free Press, Feb. 17, 2006 – https://www.facts-are-facts.com/news/letter-from-venezuela ↑
14. ibid ↑

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

A search of Evgeny Mikhail Jonesovich’s (my nickname for so called Catholic author Eugene Michael Jones) material resulted in an alarming conclusion.

Chabad Lubavitch, the Soviet-derived Chassidic Jewish crime syndicate believed to be the most powerful organization in the world and likely the descendants of the infamous “Learned Elders of Zion” is not mentioned by Jones even once on his Twitter feed, is only mentioned in passing once on his website Culture Wars (to identify Rabbi Hershey Novack), and is completely absent from  his 1,200-page magnum opus on the Jews The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (2008).

How is it that the so called biggest Catholic anti-Semite on the Internet fails to even mention the most powerful Jewish organization in the world by name, much less expose their sinister global operation to enslave the world under Talmudic rule? Does he think Chabad is some obscure group that is not worth mentioning? That is very unlikely, especially with his knowledge. What seems more likely is that he is running cover.

Before I move on, I want to point out that Jonesovich has been largely silent about the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion as well. Revolutionary Spirit mentioned it, again in passing, a mere three times. You would think a 1,200-page book about revolutionary Jews would thoroughly examine the incredible revelations made in the most infamous book critical of world Jewry.

What we have learned from the prescriptions of the Soviet’s Operation SIG is that anti-Zionism is red herring directed by Soviets/Chabad/World Jewry itself as a bit of a release valve and to limit authentic anti-Jewish sentiment (see The Kremlin directs the anti-Zionist movement on behalf of Israel). My readers should be well aware of Jonesovich’s suspicious associations with the Russian state and its actors, especially the Kabbalah-loving, anti-Zionist but pro-Jewish Aleksandr Dugin.

“Zionism is Jewish satanism. Anti-Zionist Neturei Karta represent true Jewish tradition. There will always be a place for Jewish Orientalism (Eastern Jews) in the ranks of the builders of the Great Eurasian Empire.” —Dugin

Opposing Zionism but propping up “Jewish orientalism” seems to represent an internal feud within world Jewry that has Eurasianist Jewry as supreme over the universe. In this way, it could be E. Michael Jones carrying out this same script as Dugin when he fails to condemn the heart of world Jewry (Chabad, Elders of Zion) and instead focuses on the silliness of Zionism and Jewish power in the West (which is already well known and documented). It seems Jonesovich is fulfilling Operation SIG by exposing only the Western side of world Jewry whilst completely ignoring and even defending its supreme Eurasianist elder brother, specifically through Chabad Lubavitch, which was born in Lyuabvichi of the USSR.

“…there’s Neturei Karta – it’s a completely Anti-Zionist operation that opposes the State of Israel,” Jones said in a podcast with Henry Regnery.

Jones told Peter Helland in an interview entitled “Apocalypse in Golestan” (around 9:00 mark) about the crypto-Communist New Horizons Conference that he attends with Dugin and other nefarious characters:

“I said to Rabbi Weiss (of anti-zionist Jewish sect Neturei Karta), I wish all Jews were like you. His organisation is anti-zionist.”

This admission seems to confirm that Jones is, indeed, running cover for world Jewry, specifically the Eurasianist branch, by only opposing Zionism. Jones certainly doesn’t want his readers learning that Eastern Chabad is running the Russian Federation as well as most world affairs.

In summary, it seems Jones is running cover for Eurasianist Jewry of the East while using his open criticism of Western Jewry as proof that he is based and trustworthy and not controlled opposition, as some contend (myself included). His constant shilling for the Russian and Iranian states are part of his Eurasianist sympathies, and with that, his anti-Westernism makes more sense. He never seems to differentiate between classical, Catholic-based Western Civilization and the Leftist one it has become today. Exposing Chabad would inevitably implicate Russia and other Eurasianist powers and the whole house of cards would come tumbling down, so he chooses to completely ignore it.

It could be that Jewry’s plan is to allow Western Jewry and even the state of Israel to disintegrate while they rebuild their New Khazaria in Crimea, where the one-world government could be based. That would explain why Jewry has no problem exposing Zionism and Western Jewish power. What’s more, they help expose it themselves!

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

So called far-Right Canadian dissident group Diagolon appears to be a Russian proxy used to destabilize and control opposition to Justin Trudeau and his Communization of Canada.

The group, which gained traction by crashing the trucker freedom convoy in Canada, seems to have similar “fascist” tendencies to those of Ukrainian fascist groups that appear to be largely controlled directly from Moscow as a means of controlling opposition in Ukraine to Russia’s push to re-Sovietize the sovereign nation and expand its repackaged empire through the Russo-Sino-Israeli Eurasian agenda. (See The Perestroika Deception Part 1 | Part 2)

Not only does its provocative and seemingly violent founder Jeremy Mackenzie don a symbol on his military attire (he is former Canadian military) that resembles National Bolshevik Aleksandr Dugin’s chaos magick star, he has spoken positively about the neo-Soviet dictator Vladimir Putin.

“Accelerate, accelerate, there’s no way out. This is going to come to total shit, so let’s just get it over with. If you’re going to be in a fight, hit first—Vladimir Putin said that.”^[1]

Mackenzie, who seems jacked up on drugs in his podcast, clearly admires Putin and even Red China.

“Putin’s my favourite [world] leader for so many reasons.”^[2]

Accelerationism is a Soviet tactic. In order to topple capitalism and “imperialist powers”, you must accelerate or intensify unstable elements within them to the point where it starts to break down. This tactic can only come from the Kabbalah as a form of dialectical chaos (Dugin happens to love Kabbalah). Why is a supposed conservative/nationalist calling for Communist tactics in his own country? It seems that Mackenzie is National Bolshevik, or Nazbol—a deceptive ideology that at times resembles conservatism but is far from it. One of Dugin’s accelerationist strategies was to foment anti-white racists in America.

Like many Duginist controlled opposition groups, Diagolon throws in some anti-Jewish sentiment to convince their followers that they are based, whether it be talking about the Jewish question or the Holocaust.

“In late January, MacKenzie travelled from Nova Scotia to Ottawa for the ‘Freedom Convoy,’ participating in the event at Parliament Hill on Sunday afternoon and again on Monday. While there, he spent time with members of Canada First, led by white nationalist Tyler Russell. Canada First is a racist, anti-Semitic network of Groypers – followers of American white nationalist Nick Fuentes.”^[3]

This whole operation stinks. Fuentes and the Groypers are all part of the fake opposition, Q-anon, MAGA types that are leading conservatives to a dead end and, eventually, their demise. They are as legitimate as a three-dollar bill.

Another implication in this whole affair is another so-called Canadian dissident. Enter Canadian Prime Minister candidate Maxime Bernier of the “People’s Party”—”people’s” being a typical Communist descriptor itself (e.g., People’s Republic of China).

“People’s Party of Canada leader Maxime Bernier paid a visit to MacKenzie and Harrison at their hotel while they were in Ottawa. Bernier has repeatedly refused to distance himself from the Plaid Army and has boosted MacKenzie’s posts in the past.

“MacKenzie also appeared on the conspiracy-fueled InfoWars hosted by Alex Jones while in Ottawa to discuss the protest.”^[4] (See Alex Jones’ connections to Russia)

Canadian Prime Minister candidate for the Conservative Party Pierre Pollievre shook hands with Mackenzie and received flak from the Left over it.^[5] Ironically, however, Mackenzie threatened, supposedly jokingly, to rape Poilievre’s wife.

And what of the name “Diagolon”? Mackenzie designed the logo for this group, a diagonal white line on a black background, to represent the idea of some kind of North American Union running from Alaska to Florida. Dugin’s Eurasianist plan for the world involves a similar kind of integrated and unified North American region (regionalism).

Not only does Diagolon serve as controlled opposition to coral and control legitimate dissidents and force them into compromising situations (through violence, for example), it helps the predominant Leftist media in Canada portray all dissidents to Trudeau’s totalitarianism as extremist, when in reality, opposing totalitarianism is a common sense populist position.

This story is just another example of how the dissident/conservative response to the New World Order has been co-opted by the crypto-Communists from Eurasia. As Dugin bragged:

“The New Right is only a project, and we are designers and implementers, architects and builders. The future is ours.”

It seems the plan for the “New Right” is to either neuter it through ongoing gatekeeping or through tactics like Stochastic terrorism, which we have seen with shills like Alex Jones, and to polarize it as part of a dialectical ritual—all of which accelerate the West’s destruction and also give rise to further limits on freedom (hate speech laws, gun grabbing, etc.). Their accelerationist delusion will not bring back the old West, as they claim but will hasten the extinction of Western Civilization altogether and give rise to the Eurasian messianic empire.

Notes:

1. Smith, Peter, Jeremy ‘raging dissident’ Mackenzie arrested after allegedly waving handgun in local business, Feb. 2, 2022, Anti-Hate – https://www.antihate.ca/jeremy_raging_dissident_mackenzie_arrested_waving_handgun_local_business ↑
2. RageCast 112: IT WAS THE WIND!, The Diagolon Dispatch, March 20, 2021 – https://jeremymackenzie.substack.com/p/ragecast-112-it-was-the-wind-d3e ↑
3. Smith, Peter, Jeremy ‘raging dissident’ Mackenzie arrested after allegedly waving handgun in local business, Feb. 2, 2022, Anti-Hate – https://www.antihate.ca/jeremy_raging_dissident_mackenzie_arrested_waving_handgun_local_business ↑
4. ibid ↑
5. Gilmore, Rachel, Diagolon: What to know about the group whose founder shook Pierre Poilievre’s hand, Aug. 23, 2022, Global News – https://globalnews.ca/news/8989888/diagolon-explainer-jeremy-mackenzie-pierre-poilievre/ ↑

Excerpt:

“Writing in 1990, the Russian poet Joseph Brodsky could already see how the next decade would be one of chaos and contradictions, but he also understood the close connection between chaos and political power, at least in Russia: ‘This chaos and these contradictions are, in fact, a guarantee of the stability of power that is attempting to create order out of chaos and to find solutions to problems.’ He also noted that the last days of the Soviet Union could not but become an object of universal fascination by the way they evidenced an existential truth. In a world bereft of the power of revealed religion, we have to face up to the fact that no one knows how to live. Some will settle on some routine or other and never ask the question of how they should spend their limited years on this planet. The political regime under which they live, including democracy if that is the case, will push or tilt them in a certain direction and provide comfort that whatever life one leads is as close as possible to the ideal. Brodsky thought that it was to the credit of the dying Soviet government that it did not even try to evade, simplify, or disguise the question. There was no answer, there was no meaning to life, and people had simply to live with that. As the novelist Victor Pelevin puts it in The Sacred Book of the Werewolf, the substance of human life actually changes very little from culture to culture, but human beings require a beautiful wrapper to cover it. Russian culture, uniquely, fails to provide one, and it calls this state of affairs ‘spirituality’.

Gleb Pavlovsky, a student dissident in Soviet times who became a key advisor to Putin in the management of Russian public opinion, notes in a recent book how the founder of the current Russian system, Boris Yeltsin, was someone psychologically predisposed to love surprises and, perhaps more importantly, to profit from them. This characteristic became a more or less permanent part of the system. His carefully chosen successor, while developing a whole technology to manage surprises, knows that they are indispensable. Every fast and unexpected action leaves the public stunned and reinforces the distinction between rules and ruled, a distinction that European democracies have been trying to do away with for a long time. Hierarchy is defined with reference to rules, but it is not defined by the rules. What establishes your position in the system is the way you relate to rules, whether you must follow them at all times, whether you are allowed to break them, and finally, whether you can act in full indifference to the rules. In general, decisions are not taken under a norm, but concern what to do with a norm.

At the top of the pyramid rest those who make the rules. In Russia, strange as this may look to Western eyes, those who make the rules would not survive if they were not allowed to break them—and if they did not survive, there would be no rules at all. At the very bottom of the pyramid, or rather below it, one finds something infinitely more interesting than the visible rulers or ruler. European democracies are based on a system of rules, and these rules form an impenetrable membrane, so that you always find yourself under some rule. The Russian system is based on the extreme case; when the rules cease to apply, the curtain of order is pulled aside and the naked spectacle of the power that makes the rules becomes suddenly and unexpectedly visible. ‘The West is governed by rules, Russia makes the rules. Ergo, Russia should rule the West.’ This is how Vladislav Surkov—with Pavlovsky, one of the two halves of the famous Kremlin political machine—once explained his worldview to me.

Pavlovsky notes that the Kremlin does not have to wait for these extreme conditions to materialize. It can organize or manufacture them. The classic case, explored in political literature since the Greeks, is that of a prince who organizes a conspiracy against himself, so that he can draw out his enemies and destroy them in a public display of the uselessness of rising against the state. More generally, if power thrives on vanquishing opposition, and if, like the human body, it needs to be exercised, it would be dangerous to allow oneself too much of an easy life. Power is born out of the effort to create order out of chaos, and if chaos is in short supply, power itself must provide it in adequate doses. We know that Putin thinks like this because on at least one occasion, he did not shy away from proclaiming it. Addressing the crowd during a festive concert on Moscow’s Vasilyevsky Spusk square marking the first anniversary of Russia’s annexation of Crimea, he re-asserted his view that Russia and Ukraine are one people, before turning to the challenges facing Russia. He then added: ‘We ourselves will continue moving forward. We will strengthen our statehood and our country. We will overcome the difficulties that we have so easily created for ourselves over these recent times.’

Those who, like Pavlovsky, know from the inside how the system works, those who have seen the beast form close quarters, come back impressed by its chaotic nature. It is certainly not the case that President Putin has established a clear power channel by which decisions are transmitted down to the lower levels of the state. He has no incentive to do that. Every decision is a hostage to fortune: the clearer it is, the easier it will be to show that it was mistaken when things take a bad turn. Putin prefers to send ambiguous messages. He will have everyone guessing at the meaning of his words. In the case of things going wrong, it was simply because this meaning was not accurately interpreted. Under these conditions, chaos is bound to grow, but it is seen as productive and capable of reinforcing state power.

…

Part of the problem is that a country subject to a strong from of personal rule cannot rely on a stable, predictable framework. It is hostage to the variable states of mind of its leader or leaders. As novelist Vladimir Sorokin writes, ‘the wheel of unpredictability has been spun; the rules of the game have been set.’ Putin has become the ‘capricious, unpredictable Queen of Spades’. More importantly, a system that failed to incorporate a dimension of chaos, that pushed the irrationality of the world to the outside, would become vulnerable to that very chaos irrupting from the outside. Finally, power is not power if it is not exercised and the greatest power must be exercised against the greatest opposition, the greatest threat to political order. Power becomes all the more terrible if it is able to hold in place the permanent threat of chaos, if those under it know that, were that power to be removed, the world would immediately enter a time of unimaginable trouble and turmoil.

That is why politics in Russia can be precisely defined as the management of chaos.

—Brunco Macaes, The Dawn of Eurasia; on the trail of the New World Order, pages 196-199

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

Despite appearances to the contrary, the neo-Soviet Russian Federation is pursuing the opposite of what it claims, as a means of attaining Lenin’s dream of world Communist domination.

Since the Eurasianist agenda has ramped up since about 2014, the rhetoric coming from Moscow has been that it is pursuing a multipolar world where power is distributed between several nations rather than in just one, the United States.

Anything considered “globalist” is portrayed as United States or Western world dominance, and anything bad that happens in the world is conveniently blamed on the United States via “globalism”. (Yes, this looks like repackaged Soviet-era propaganda to blame the United States and the West for absolutely everything wrong with the world). The Eurasianists put a strong emphasis on their Islamic-styled sexual policies and fixate on the homosexualized policies of the West, even though Russia played a direct role in shaping those perverted policies that were exported to and eventually adopted by the West.

This is where Russia and its allies, namely China, portray themselves as the antidote to globalism in the form of liberators on a multipolar platter. This liberator facade is ironic considering that the problems that have developed in the West are directly related to decades of Soviet-Communist subversion of the West. The Sino-Soviet bear has crossed the Atlantic, climbed onto the North American continent, taken a big watery dump, swam back across the Atlantic to Russia, and is now telling its neighbours that America and the West are a huge pile of dung.

The carefully crafted multipolar persona is also designed to cover up neo-Soviet expansion. According to the Eurasianists, Russia is not invading Ukraine, it’s simply liberating it from globalist encroachment. It can use this lie for any country it invades or meddles with, be it Poland, Lithuania, Syria, or Iran. China can they use this same persona when “liberating” Hong Kong, Taiwan, or Singapore.

Anyone with a Grade 7 education can figure out what a crock all of this is. All they have to do is look at the unipolar (globalist) pursuit of Russia and China through its Eurasianist channels: the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAU), BRICS, Common Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), and last but not least, the Shanghai Co-operation Organization. These are just the official channels being used to bring about Eurasianist global supremacy. There are all kinds of backdoor deals being done, especially through the many organized crime syndicates that hold power in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Russia, and the Far East, to gradually bring everyone under subservience to the Eurasian space.

The paper-thin multipolar pursuit of the Eurasianists is a transitory phase only. The U.S. and Great Britain have maintained unipolar dominance for quite some time, but it has been a net benefit to the world, both spiritually and economically (for example, see Bruce Gilley’s The Case for Colonialism). As I mentioned before, Communist subversion has tainted Western dominance, and now Russia and China are playing the moral high ground while completely dismissing the good aspects throughout the majority of the era of Western dominance. Multipolarity, then, is designed to wrest away power from the West while appearing to distribute that power back to individual nations. In reality, Russia and China are extracting this newly “liberated” power for themselves, their Eurasianist empire, and eventually, their false messiah. The more we look at it, the more it appears an anti-Christ will rule the world through the Eurasian landmass.