By Timothy Fitzpatrick

It’s puzzled me for years what Kremlin perennialist E. Michael Jones’ primary objective is with his Communist racket over there in South Bend, Indiana.

Sure, he’s a shameless Kremlin toadie and advocate of Communism disguised as solidarism and labour-based value. He knows that cheap, superficial anti-Semitism is a tool with which gradually to acclimate Western conservatives to a backdoor acceptance of Communism. Throw in a few Catholic ideas to make it all legitimate looking and, poof! 

If the elderly Jones is an ideological Communist, then these beliefs are expected, so shilling them wouldn’t really be all that difficult for him. But there are plenty of other “alt-media” covert Communists to push this nonsense. Why would the Kremlin waste basic Commie shilling on a brilliant mind like Jones’? Yes, saturation is important in any shilling operation. But Jones has got to be one of the most intelligent Communists I’ve ever heard of. But even the intelligent can be deceived and can deceive themselves into believing nonsense, especially when lust blinds them. If Jones is as intelligent as he seems to be, then maybe he is not an ideological Communist. He seems to be a power guy, so maybe he feels empowered by Communism, by his Soviet backers, and the hold over others his Communist support affords him. 

Jones’ best work easily is Libido Dominandi, which is all about sexual passion. Jones doesn’t seem to struggle at all in the sexual lust department and knows well its power over those who submit to it. So, perhaps its a different kind of lust that plagues Jones. Perhaps it is a kind of lust for power. It has been said by those who know him that he is a narcissist, and we all know that narcissists thrive on power—even if that power seems insignificant to observers. Narcissists just can’t help themselves. Narcissists tend to be highly intelligent and, like the closely related sociopaths, tend to be wordsmiths (see Author describes E. Michael Jones as a prideful “malignant narcissist” who made himself a martyr for fame).

So, what is this seeming powerguy really up to in his work for the devil? The recurring pattern is Islam. Secondarily, it seems to be Russia, although Soviet power lurks behind both. It’s difficult to tell which narrative Jones shills more, Russia or Islam. Is the objective to get his mainly Catholic, conservative audience to warm up to Islam and Russia in the build up to the coming syncretic one-world religious and economic system, which will be headquartered in the East?

Jones just published on his site an excerpt from his article The West Has Failed: Tolkien, Traditionalism and Islamophobia in his rag Culture Wars, which continues the pattern of Russophilia and Islamophilia.

Jones advocates the tired Gaza genocide narrative as a grifter in Operation SIG and claims that Jewish power is dwindling merely because anti-Zionism is growing (contrary to popular belief, Jewry is not dependent on Zionism). Not only is Jewish privilege not dwindling, it’s increasing, at least among elite Jewry, Chabad—something Jones never talks about (see my article, Most powerful Jewish organization in world Chabad completely absent from E. Michael Jones’ writings).

Jones takes a post on X by a Jew rightfully calling out Muslims as murderers of Christians as another example of “Islamophobia”. Jones knows his audience eat up his cheap anti-Semitism and insinuates that because it was a Jew critical of Islam, it is automatically unwarranted and should, therefore, be dismissed.

“Instead of changing their behavior, they try to generate hatred for Muslims, as the neocons did after 9/11, or hatred of Germans as Morgenthau, Nizer, and Kaufmann did after World War II. All of these narratives are failing as the third republic, the American Empire, and Jewish privilege come to an end.”

Jones talks a lot about Jews needing to change their behaviour—with which we whole heartedly agree—but says nothing about Muslims needing to change their behaviour, when the two squabbling Semitic tribes are both of ill repute. You can tell that his comment about hatred of Germans was an afterthought that he threw in to make it look like his main concern was not solely the welfare of Muslims.

Why does an aging hispter reaping the benefits of capitalism while pushing Communism gain from brownnosing into the dirt a bunch of troglodytic Mohemmedans? He’s bridging the gap. Islamists not only serve as foot soldiers (Soviet Islam) for the revolution, they are the bridge to perennialist universalism. They are the key to Noahidism. Christianity and Judaism are irreconcilable, but Islam can be used to merge them, albeit unnaturally, whether directly or through dialectics.

Back to the article, Jones tells us that the threat of Sharia law in the West is all just alarmism perpetuated by “out-of-state” far Right activists pushing anti-Islamic narratives. Congratulations, Jones, you sound no different than CNN or the anti-Zionist Jewish Left. Why would Jones have a problem with Sharia law or droning Islamic prayer calls in Dearborn, Michigan or Minnesota when Jones himself is more than happy to shout “allahu ackbar” and believes Muslims and Christians follow the same God?

It’s highly suspicious that Jones has not talked about Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmitd’s admission on Russia Today a few years ago that Islam is being used by Jewry to clear out Christendom for the arrival of their false messiah. Jones has a lot to say about the Black-Jewish alliance, but when have you ever heard him talk about the Islamo-Jewish alliance? The Jewish dialectic of using Islam was birthed long before Islam was created (see Fallen angel Metatron told 2nd century Kabbalist sage Simon bar Yochai that Islam would be used to eradicate Christendom on behalf of Jewry).

In the article, Jones creates the perception that any criticism of Islam, whether it be from Tommy Robinson, Cam Higby, or an old man at the corner coffee shop is entirely the work of the Jews. The antics of provocateurs like Robinson may indeed by orchestrated, but Western opposition to Islam is absolutely warranted and imperative. His simpleton readers will not be able to see through this, though, because their understanding of the Jewish question is too shallow. They can’t see beyond the facade of Zionism the collaboration between the Jewish and Islamic elite, much less the collaboration between Russia and Jewry. Jones only focuses on the controlled opposition to Islam (Robinson, et al) because it is the easiest strawman. Jones wouldn’t stand a chance against a legitimate opponent of Islam. Someone like Trevor Loudon would tear Jones to pieces, just like Jones has been torn to pieces by race realists debunking his absurd stance on race.

And who is Jones to single out provocateurs like Robinson, Jake Lang, or Higby, when Jones himself has employed a well known Kremlin agent provocateur, David Reilly? Jones has no problem linking these provocateurs to his former employee, I assume because Jones is claiming ignorance of Reilly’s behaviour and background. How was the intelligent hipster not able to discern Reilly before he took him into his publishing house? And for how long  did Reilly continue to work for Jones while it was becoming more and more apparent his suspicious behaviour (alcoholism, entrapment, provocateuring, etc.)

“Missing from Grok’s database is the article which described Reilly’s attempt to take over Culture Wars magazine and clearly identified him as an FBI agent provocateur. During the early months of his employment as Culture Wars’ media guy, Reilly lived with fellow employee Mike Bajiackas in a rural area northwest of South Bend. Guns were part of that culture, and Mike B. introduced Reilly to Indiana gun culture in a way that would later cause serious problems:”

Jones conveniently glosses over all the things he shares in common with Reilly—to this day—like Russia and Alexander Dugin. Jones then goes on a lengthy tirade crafting the image that Reilly, the FBI, and Mossad were all working together to compromise Culture Wars. If the FBI is using provocateurs like Dave Reilly, it’s on a lower level than state actors like the Kremlin or Iran. Jones is twisting things to make himself come out looking clean, when he is actually as deep into the grifting as Reilly is.

Jones’ propping up of the Islamic ascent to the power of city halls in New York (Zohran Mamdani) and Dearborn (Abdullah H. Hammoud) as bulwarks against Jewish hegemony is laughable. Russian Communists have already claimed Mamdani as one of their own. We can only assume the same applies to Hammoud. Again, Jones is doing his best to ignore or obscure the Muslim-Jewish alliance. He’s a gatekeeper for this most crucial alliance against Christ and His Church.

Jones is a much more polished and reliable Kremlin operative than clowns like Dave Reilly. It’s easy to look better than a clown. Again, they have more in common than they don’t have in common. Operatives turn on each other all the time, especially in the Soviet controlled alt media. This is nothing new. Remember the staged Mark Dice-Alex Jones split that was miraculously healed not long after.

A new narrative has appeared from Jones’ bag of Chabadnik phylacteries. “Catholic Islamophoba”. For this, he blames an author for it, J.R.R. Tolkien, of Lord of the Rings fame. Here, Jones endorses the biggest lie of all time, the Soviet Union collapse of 1991, and portrays Catholic Islamophobia as evolving from anti-Communism. At least he (inadvertently?) admits that the two are one. Forget Mohammedan behaviour being the root cause of “Islamophobia”, it’s a children’s author. Jones made some plausible, unique interpretations of pop culture in Monsters of the Id, but as Jones would say, that Tolkien is responsible for a justifiable “phobia” of Muslims is absolutely preposterous!

But never let a good narrative go to waste.

“Tolkien despised Russia and held the Russians ‘more responsible for the present crisis and choice of moment than Hitler,’ writes Jones.

Tolkien is absolutely correct. Jones is absolutely treasonous. Nazism was a Soviet creation. But when has Jones, the great historian, ever talked about that? 

The excerpt ends and Jones concludes by appealing to, like every good kosher anti-Semite does, to the Balfour declaration, which is a Soviet distraction device (see Soviets founded state of Israel and Zionism; Balfour declaration a decoy). I am not sure where Jones goes with his Tolkien narrative and I refuse to pay him to see the entire article, but it seemed as if he was setting up Tolkien to be a pawn the Jews, as is the case with most of villains in Jones’ head.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Sept. 16, 2023 Anno Domini

A couple of months ago, a 79-year-old FBI double agent and American traitor was found dead in his prison cell of 21 years.

Robert Hannsen, a devotee of a powerful pseudo conservative cult inside the Catholic Church known as Opus Dei, had ended up in his daily 23-hour solitary confinement by betraying his country for a bag of silver from the KGB. He betrayed the FBI and also his Catholic wife, not only by leading a double life as a KGB spy but also by allowing his friend to watch him and his wife having sex.[i]

Ironically, the traitor had been known to accuse the Russians of being Godless, though he was serving their interests. Supposedly, this Godlessness is what provoked the Opus Dei to eventually set up shop in the “former” Soviet Union some five years after Hanssen initially was imprisoned. The corrupt KGB-installed Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill, agent “Mikhailov”, was more than happy to welcome to new “Catholic” outreach, which set up the Opus Dei Centre in Moscow on June 26, 2007.

“The vice president of the Department of Foreign Ecclesial Affairs of the Patriarchate of Moscow, Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin, welcomed the personal prelature of Opus Dei, which recently opened a community in Russia, and said its energy and fidelity ‘to Christian ideals are worthy of great respect’… The vicar for Opus Dei in Moscow, Father Jose Antonio Senovilla Garcia, said his community has gone to Russia ‘to encourage the people to be good orthodox believers, to find God in their daily lives and to help others’.”[ii]

If the Moscow Patriarchate is OK with the Dei’s presence in Russia, then so is the Kremlin, then so is the KGB, then so is the Communist International (COMINTERN); meanwhile, authentic Catholic teaching is considered hostile to the Eurasian-oriented crypto Soviet state.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s “brain” and prophet Aleksandr Dugin, a middle aged occultist managing controlled opposition “conservatives” in Western nations has admitted the real neo-Soviet and fiercely anti-Catholic views of the Kremlin and the Communist International. However, these admissions can only be found on Russian language sites.

“Destroy Catholicism from within, strengthen Freemasonry.[iii] Both they (New World Order) and we (Eurasians) want to deprive you of your Catholicism; Orthodoxy…is much closer to what we call paganism.[iv] I think the best thing in Polish history is the Jewish tradition in small towns in eastern Poland. Actually, I am interested in everything that was anti-Catholic in Poland: Polish freemasons and occultists, Jan Potocki and Hoene-Wroński, Mienżyński and Dzerzhinsky … They all chose the Eurasian path.[v]”

If Dugin’s views on Catholicism are an indication of the Kremlin’s, then we can be certain that the neo-Soviet state’s permission of Catholic churches in its country are for show and are closely monitored for compliance with the state agenda—as it is also with the Russian Orthodox Church and all other religions, especially Islam.

Before Opus Dei officially entered Russia, all the way back in 1991—the year the Soviets successfully fooled the world that Soviet Communism had collapsed, one Father Myron Effing of Evansville, Indiana (E. Michael Jones’ home state) had brought his Catholic mission to the Red Empire but on the opposite end of the country in the geopolitically significant city of Vladivostok. It shares borders with China, Japan, and North Korea. Although Effing’s Vlad mission (Mary Mother of God Mission Society) doesn’t overtly claim affiliation with the cult, Opus Dei made a rather interesting prediction in 2011.

“…but it is for God first of all, who has brought us to that beloved country, Russia, through St Josemaria’s prayers. How much he prayed for your country, how much he prayed for you! In union with his regard, I am sure we will reach from St Petersburgh to Vladivostok, doing a wonderful apostolate which will bring forth not only Numerary Assistants but Numeraries, Associates, and Supernumeraries, lots of them….”[vi]

Why does Opus Dei consider Russia beloved? Most of its authentic Christians were murdered off during the Red Terror.

In a November 1, 2012 newsletter put out by Effing and his Vlad Mission, a reference was made to Opus Dei which may suggest an affiliation. During the mission’s 16^th annual Far Eastern Catholic Youth Conference, Effing describes an activity where participants were to choose a saint to study and promote for a week.

“The ‘green’ group got St. Josemaria Escriva, the founder of Opus Dei”.[vii]

Effing joins the modernists in their declaration for both Escriva and Pope John Paul II as saints. This isn’t really surprising when you consider that Effing utilizes the highly popular Protestant “Alpha Course” in his mission. Is he an ecumenist in the spirit of Vatican II or is the Alpha covertly Catholic somehow?

Father Effing happens to have as a member of his Vlad Mission the daughter-in-law of pro-Kremlin author and Culture Wars editor Eugene Michael Jones of South Bend Indiana (an Opus Dei centre). Anna Gafurova Jones was the Mission’s first parish organist and choir director. Her mother, Ludmilla Rakhmanova, is a charter member of the mission’s choir and serves as professor of dramatics at The Far Eastern Art Institute in Vladivostok.

“Ludmilla is the director of all operas produced in Vladivostok, a position in which she has worked at one time or another with most of the classical musicians in the Russian Far East….”

It’s unclear how one of E. Michael Jones’ sons would’ve met a Russka from Russia’s far East. But it seems fitting that such a thing should happen given Jones’ unwavering support for the Kremlin and its neo-Soviet satellites, especially Iran, whom Jones can’t seem to love and promote enough.

Although Russia pretends that it has dropped Communism—something which Father Effing seems to believe or at least echo, it maintains strict control over academia, religion, and especially Western influence. It’s difficult to imagine all Catholic Churches in Russia operating without state approval. “So long as no one ventures off the path we have laid out, you may have a presence here,” it seems. This is how it is in Red China, where the state even appoints its own “Catholic” bishops without consent from the Vatican. Catholic presence in Russia helps create the illusion that it is an open society and has, indeed, parted with its Soviet ways. More importantly, perhaps, is that it allows the neo-Soviets easier access to the Church and a means by which to spread its errors right into the heart of the Church and in Catholic nations.

If Catholic presence in Russia is strictly controlled by the crypto-Soviet regime, then what does that say of Opus Dei’s presence there?

According to a mysterious book called Opus Judei published in Colombia in 2000, Opus Dei is a subversive Judeo-masonic organization bent on destroying the Catholic Church from within.[viii] This incredible book seems to be legitimate, as it provides many details which only an insider would seem to have and comes to logical conclusions (to corroborate its conclusions, see my dossier on Opus Dei). If you haven’t seen my dossier on E. Michael Jones, which suggests that he is chasing the same Judeo-masonic-Bolshevist goals as Opus Dei, please browse through it. While Opus Dei uses the front as a traditional, conservative Catholic organization, Jones uses the front of anti-Judaism. However, when you dissect the Jones character enough, you realize that he is actually only anti-Zionist and doesn’t seem to oppose the Kabbalistic and perennialist elements of the Christ-denying cult. He seems to be using anti-Judaism to appeal to his traditional Catholic audience so that he can then secretly inject his Marxist, Russia-is-the-saviour poison into them. Incidentally, Jones is a favourite among the schismatic Eastern Orthodox, like with Estonian Monk Seraphim. Iranian convert to Eastern Orthodoxy Roosh V (Daryush Valizadeh) credits Jones with his conversion. Strange that a so called traditional Catholic is inspiring others to convert to Eastern Orthodoxy—the dominant church in the “former” Communist countries of Eastern Europe and Russia.

Jones has publicly denied being a member of Opus Dei; however, according to the above mentioned Opus Judei book, members—much like Freemasons—tend to obfuscate their membership in order to deceive the public.

“Lieutenant General Fernando Rodrigo Cifuentes made the following statements when referring to Opus Dei: ‘As a military man, I consider the high commitments that the military man has contracted with the nation to be totally in conflict with any other commitments that are undoubtedly contracted by accepting the regulations of a secret association, since its work of recruitment and action is secret.’ (35) Colonel Antonio Sánchez Cámara said: ‘Many, many members of Opus Dei, if asked directly, deny their membership. Opus Dei is something closed, and I like open spaces.’”[ix]

Jones’ publishing company, Fidelity Press, shares some suspicious characteristics with Opus Dei. As it happens, “fidelity” is a significant word in the Opus Dei cult.

“After proselytism and recruitment, come the VOWS, which at first are taken for one year and renewed for five—the so-called “Oblation”; the next step is the juridical incorporation into the Work, which is called “Fidelity”—the culmination of the process of depersonalization.”[x]

On top of that, Jones has as his logo for his Fidelity Press an encircled cross with what appears to be a rose emerging from behind it. This is exactly the Opus Dei’s main symbol. The Opus Judei author claims the rose and empty cross (as opposed to a proper Catholic crucifix) are Kabbalistic in meaning (perhaps also Rosicrucian in origin?).

“The symbol of the rose is a very important part of the Hebrew Kabbalistic tradition. (99) Already in the psalms and in the Jewish prophetic poems, the red rose and the white rose personify the punished and purified bodies of Israel. But in the Kabbalah it goes even further on the path of meanings. The Tree, sephirotic, divided into three vertical columns, has the central one precisely under the invocation of the rose, which in this way restores and balances the rigorous and severe part of creation -left- with its clement and merciful side -right-.”[xi]

“The members of Opus Dei carry, in their pockets, crosses without the body of Christ. Of the crucified Son of God, the Work accepts and recognizes as its own only an empty wooden cross. The camouflaged reasons given by Escrivá are that the naked bodies of Jesus Christ are usually badly made and repugnant. The crucifix is the symbol of faith. The wood, the Calvary where the Jews exercised their deicide.

It is a custom and compulsory rule that in every center or house of Opus Dei “there is a black cross without Christ, which will be decorated twice a year. (102) These heterodox practices have been censured as well as their secrecy, as their thumb is placed on their lips.

If to the bare cross we add the rose we have the rose-cross. Kabbalistic alchemy could not be more explicit and perfect.”[xii]

(These are just some of Jones’ connections to Opus Judei. See more in Randy Engel’s article All the men behind the Opus Dei curtain.)

One might conclude from Engel’s article that both Michael Voris of Church Militant (also pro-Kremlin) and Eugene Michael Jones of Fidelity Press couldn’t possibly both be Opus Dei members since they are feuding with each other over Jones supposedly breaking the confessional seal by exposing Voris’ homosexual past. Again, we turn to Opus Judei for a possible answer.

“Judas the Iscariot has gone down in history not because of his possible virtues as an apostle of Jesus Christ, but because of the secret denunciation he made of his Master that led to the arrest of the Messiah. In such a compact and hermetic circle as Opus Dei is, everyone wants to be an informer, a public and private accuser, a snitch, a confidant of their own closest brothers and sisters. There are various reasons for this, including the fact that informing on the truth in Opus Dei is a practice and a “virtue” so that the followers always live in an atmosphere of mutual and reciprocal distrust, fear, insecurity and isolation, all of which are extremely important for keeping the sect member in chains, in a permanent manner.

Opus Dei pays careful attention to what it calls constant and persistent spiritual direction, which binds and marks each and every one of its members. This is complemented, on a weekly basis, by what it calls “sharing of confidences”, which helps to configure a rigid hierarchical-spiritual order.

On the other hand, the denunciation of the brother by the brother, the embarrassment and shame of being singled out by one’s nearest neighbor, is a rule and an obligation laid down in the statutes and regulations of the Work itself. It is a common and habitual practice, fomented, encouraged and praised by those in charge of the organization.

…

But if sharing of confidences can be disturbing, no less so is public denouncement, the evidence in which they must also, weekly, leave each other, like Judas, but in this case the reward is not thirty denarii of silver, but holiness and heaven in eternity. Public accusation and repression is an unavoidable and inexcusable duty, as laid down in the very Constitutions of Opus Dei which, in article 270, stipulates that ‘The numerary members and the Oblates will meet every week for the brief circle where defects are corrected, where the means of apostolate are proposed and where everything that can guide our spirit and our specific action is dealt with in a familiar way’. Every member must submit or be called to order.”[xiii]

During his time with the FBI and as an Opus Dei member, traitor Robert Hannsen spent time in Gary, Indiana and Chicago, Illinois—just a stone’s throw from Eugene Michael Jones in South Bend. Because the mid-West is a hotbed of Opus Dei activity, one wonders if these two characters ever crossed paths while shilling for the Kremlin and possibly working for Opus Dei.

Notes:

[i] Leonard, Tom, The sordid truth of FBI mole Robert Hanssen’s private perversions… how the Soviet spy let a friend secretly watch him and his wife having SEX – all while he was betraying his country, Daily Mail, June 7, 2023 – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12170269/How-Soviet-spy-FBI-agent-Robert-Hanssen-invited-friend-watch-wife-having-SEX.html

[ii] Catholic News Agency, Patriarchate of Moscow welcomes Opus Dei presence in Russia, Dec. 18, 2007 – https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/11307/patriarchate-of-moscow-welcomes-opus-dei-presence-in-russia

[iii] Radio Spada, Reflections on some words by A. Dugin, April 19, 2023 – https://www.radiospada.org/2023/04/distruggere-il-cattolicesimo-dallinterno-rafforzare-la-massoneria-riflessioni-su-alcune-parole-di-a-dugin/

[iv] Fronda, Alexander Dugin: I am waiting for Ivan the Terrible, March 1998 – https://www.fronda.pl/a/aleksander-dugin-czekam-na-iwana-groznego,45653.html

[v] ibid

[vi] Echevarria, Javier, “The driving force for the apostolic work”, Opus Dei, Nov. 29, 2011 – https://opusdei.org/en-ca/article/the-driving-force-for-the-apostolic-work/

[vii] Vladivostok Sunrise, Issue Number One Hundred Eight, November 1, 2012, pg. 4

[viii] Opus Judei, 2000, Bogota, Columbia – http://www.reductio.net/OpusJudei-Index.html

[ix] Ibid, Ch. 1, part 3

[x] Ibid, Ch. 1, part 7

[xi] Ibid, Ch. 3, part 4

[xii] Ibid

[xiii] Ibid, Ch. 1, part 14

A teaser to an upcoming post, John “Mutt” Lange’s Def Leppard, led by Jewish-born vocalist Joe Elliot. All kinds of Illuminati symbolism and lyrics going on here.

Sexual liberation and psychoanalysis, brought to us by the Jewish Kabbalist Sigmund Freud and Alfred Kinsey. Kinsey was brought to prominence by the Illuminati Rockefeller Foundation and media barons like New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger.