By Timothy Fitzpatrick

So called far-Right Canadian dissident group Diagolon appears to be a Russian proxy used to destabilize and control opposition to Justin Trudeau and his Communization of Canada.

The group, which gained traction by crashing the trucker freedom convoy in Canada, seems to have similar “fascist” tendencies to those of Ukrainian fascist groups that appear to be largely controlled directly from Moscow as a means of controlling opposition in Ukraine to Russia’s push to re-Sovietize the sovereign nation and expand its repackaged empire through the Russo-Sino-Israeli Eurasian agenda. (See The Perestroika Deception Part 1 | Part 2)

Not only does its provocative and seemingly violent founder Jeremy Mackenzie don a symbol on his military attire (he is former Canadian military) that resembles National Bolshevik Aleksandr Dugin’s chaos magick star, he has spoken positively about the neo-Soviet dictator Vladimir Putin.

“Accelerate, accelerate, there’s no way out. This is going to come to total shit, so let’s just get it over with. If you’re going to be in a fight, hit first—Vladimir Putin said that.”^[1]

Mackenzie, who seems jacked up on drugs in his podcast, clearly admires Putin and even Red China.

“Putin’s my favourite [world] leader for so many reasons.”^[2]

Accelerationism is a Soviet tactic. In order to topple capitalism and “imperialist powers”, you must accelerate or intensify unstable elements within them to the point where it starts to break down. This tactic can only come from the Kabbalah as a form of dialectical chaos (Dugin happens to love Kabbalah). Why is a supposed conservative/nationalist calling for Communist tactics in his own country? It seems that Mackenzie is National Bolshevik, or Nazbol—a deceptive ideology that at times resembles conservatism but is far from it. One of Dugin’s accelerationist strategies was to foment anti-white racists in America.

Like many Duginist controlled opposition groups, Diagolon throws in some anti-Jewish sentiment to convince their followers that they are based, whether it be talking about the Jewish question or the Holocaust.

“In late January, MacKenzie travelled from Nova Scotia to Ottawa for the ‘Freedom Convoy,’ participating in the event at Parliament Hill on Sunday afternoon and again on Monday. While there, he spent time with members of Canada First, led by white nationalist Tyler Russell. Canada First is a racist, anti-Semitic network of Groypers – followers of American white nationalist Nick Fuentes.”^[3]

This whole operation stinks. Fuentes and the Groypers are all part of the fake opposition, Q-anon, MAGA types that are leading conservatives to a dead end and, eventually, their demise. They are as legitimate as a three-dollar bill.

Another implication in this whole affair is another so-called Canadian dissident. Enter Canadian Prime Minister candidate Maxime Bernier of the “People’s Party”—”people’s” being a typical Communist descriptor itself (e.g., People’s Republic of China).

“People’s Party of Canada leader Maxime Bernier paid a visit to MacKenzie and Harrison at their hotel while they were in Ottawa. Bernier has repeatedly refused to distance himself from the Plaid Army and has boosted MacKenzie’s posts in the past.

“MacKenzie also appeared on the conspiracy-fueled InfoWars hosted by Alex Jones while in Ottawa to discuss the protest.”^[4] (See Alex Jones’ connections to Russia)

Canadian Prime Minister candidate for the Conservative Party Pierre Pollievre shook hands with Mackenzie and received flak from the Left over it.^[5] Ironically, however, Mackenzie threatened, supposedly jokingly, to rape Poilievre’s wife.

And what of the name “Diagolon”? Mackenzie designed the logo for this group, a diagonal white line on a black background, to represent the idea of some kind of North American Union running from Alaska to Florida. Dugin’s Eurasianist plan for the world involves a similar kind of integrated and unified North American region (regionalism).

Not only does Diagolon serve as controlled opposition to coral and control legitimate dissidents and force them into compromising situations (through violence, for example), it helps the predominant Leftist media in Canada portray all dissidents to Trudeau’s totalitarianism as extremist, when in reality, opposing totalitarianism is a common sense populist position.

This story is just another example of how the dissident/conservative response to the New World Order has been co-opted by the crypto-Communists from Eurasia. As Dugin bragged:

“The New Right is only a project, and we are designers and implementers, architects and builders. The future is ours.”

It seems the plan for the “New Right” is to either neuter it through ongoing gatekeeping or through tactics like Stochastic terrorism, which we have seen with shills like Alex Jones, and to polarize it as part of a dialectical ritual—all of which accelerate the West’s destruction and also give rise to further limits on freedom (hate speech laws, gun grabbing, etc.). Their accelerationist delusion will not bring back the old West, as they claim but will hasten the extinction of Western Civilization altogether and give rise to the Eurasian messianic empire.

Notes:

1. Smith, Peter, Jeremy ‘raging dissident’ Mackenzie arrested after allegedly waving handgun in local business, Feb. 2, 2022, Anti-Hate – https://www.antihate.ca/jeremy_raging_dissident_mackenzie_arrested_waving_handgun_local_business ↑
2. RageCast 112: IT WAS THE WIND!, The Diagolon Dispatch, March 20, 2021 – https://jeremymackenzie.substack.com/p/ragecast-112-it-was-the-wind-d3e ↑
3. Smith, Peter, Jeremy ‘raging dissident’ Mackenzie arrested after allegedly waving handgun in local business, Feb. 2, 2022, Anti-Hate – https://www.antihate.ca/jeremy_raging_dissident_mackenzie_arrested_waving_handgun_local_business ↑
4. ibid ↑
5. Gilmore, Rachel, Diagolon: What to know about the group whose founder shook Pierre Poilievre’s hand, Aug. 23, 2022, Global News – https://globalnews.ca/news/8989888/diagolon-explainer-jeremy-mackenzie-pierre-poilievre/ ↑

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

Author-turned Eurasian guest of honour E. Michael Jones completely failed at trying to dismiss last month the claim that he is a KGB asset aiding the demise of the West.

Jones attempted to dismiss the claim (made by researcher Andy Sloan on this site) using a strawman argument during a live chat on Restoring the Faith, March 6, 2021.

“Someone is now spreading this ridiculous, preposterous claim that I am a KGB agent because I was in a room with Aleksandr Dugin,” Jones declared. He went on, “I am in the unfortunate position of being unable to prove a negative. I cannot prove that I am not a KGB agent, so the burden of proof lies on these people, these character assassinations (sic) who are launching this in the first place. I was at a conference in Tehran with Dugin…he gave a speech about multi-polarity. I offered an objection to that that speech saying we lived in some sense a uni-polar world, even if it’s not the United States of America that’s head of it. That was the extent of our discussion. This Internet breeds character assassination and this is one example of it.”

First off, Sloan’s article in no way based his claim merely on the fact that Jones was in the same room with Dugin (on multiple occasions, by the way). Jones then follows his strawman argument with a challenge of burden of proof, which Sloan did thoroughly provide. Jones addressed none of the many, many pieces of evidence written by Sloan. Did he even read it or is he deceiving his audience about the breadth of evidence?

Jones then claims he offered an objection to Dugin’s speech about multi-polarity. But he didn’t really offer an objection, though. He merely stated what he perceives as the current world geopolitical reality—that it is unipolar. Furthermore, Jones completely fails to discern (deliberately?) Dugin’s meaning of multi-polarity, which is really just jargonous deception to distract from the fact that Dugin wants his Eurasian union to rule the world as a unipolar, neo-Bolshevik empire (world government). To achieve this, the Eurasianists have to break the West’s seemingly unipolar rule using an appeal to the West’s enemies to engage in multi-polarism (divesting from the West) and embracing the East (Eurasianism, Belt and Road initiative). If Jones genuinely can’t understand this, then he is unfit to be a geopolitical analyst, especially as a self-appointed representative of the Catholic Church and the United States of America. Even Glenn Beck’s audience have a better understanding of Dugin’s deceptive language than does Jones, and Beck’s audience could be classified as “normies”.

At worst, Sloan is correct and Jones is a KGB asset wittingly distorting the evidence. Either way, Jones is carrying out the neo-Soviet Eurasianists’ objective of distorting the East’s true intentions as well as blaming the West for what is really Eastern subversion of it. While Jones does seem free, in his apparent KGB mission, to criticize world Jewry, he flat out denies Jewry’s subdivisions: subversion by freemasonry and Soviet communist threat.

“…communism was never a threat, in general.” —Jones

This is in addition to Jones being a race denialist (except when non-whites are he subject), denial of communism as a still-present threat, soft on Vatican II and its “popes”, outright heretical statements concerning Islam, propping up of Putin as an anti-globalist renegade, and associations with numerous Eurasianists and socialists, like Israel Shamir and Dugin—all Soviet-friendly narratives.

Jones has become so blatant with his agenda, I have had to create a dossier just to catalogue it all. The guy smacks of shill. It’s becoming more and more plain.

By Fronda Quarterly No. 11-12
March 1998 Anno Domini
Translated from the Polish

Question and Answer session with Grzegorz Górny and Putin’s Prophet Aleksandr Dugin (answers in quotations):

Aleksander Dugin: I am waiting for Ivan the Terrible

– Students of the Diplomatic Academy in Moscow, whom I talked to, told me that the reading they were given during the classes, i.e. your book Fundamentals of geopolitics, was the most remembered chapter devoted to sacred geography. In Poland, I have not met anyone who would deal with this issue.Could you please tell us what place Poland occupies in sacred geography?

– I have never dealt specifically with the case of Poland, although its place is very specific. After all, this is the north of Eurasia, an important region of the pre-Christian Slavic region, the Baltic Sea basin. Regarding the archetypes of sacred geography, I would like to point out two things.

First of all, in the Orthodox reality there is a synergy between the pre-Christian and Christian world models, which overlap homologously, without conflicts. Different figures and phenomena from different orders overlap painlessly and even harmoniously. In the case of Poland, there is a much more conflicting relationship between these two models, and this is due to Catholicism, which is a tradition completely different from that of Orthodoxy. René Guenon clearly separates tradition from religion. Tradition is a broader concept than religion. Orthodoxy is a tradition, Catholicism is a religion. Tradition is able to absorb elements of other religious beliefs without conflict. Religion, on the other hand, comes into conflict with other beliefs. It is related to a different historical experience of the Eastern and Western Churches after the Great Schism. For the West was not always purely religious, Catholic, there was a period when it was more traditional, Orthodox. After the great schism, however, Catholicism departed from tradition and narrowed down to religion. This is at least our Byzantine version.

How does this relate to sacred geography? Well, in our understanding, the West, understood as a territory where Catholicism and Protestantism dominate, is in an opposite relationship to religious norms and elements. Of course, there are many elements of other religions in the West, but they conflict with the Catholic religion. Institutions that deal with sacred geography or remnants of pre-Christian traditions in the West, after the Great Schism, were relegated to autonomous spheres – to magic, esotericism, hermetic orders. In Orthodoxy, such a split did not take place.

In this context, Poland is on the border between the Catholic and Orthodox worlds. From my Eurasian point of view, the archetype of Poland’s sacred geography is deeply dualistic: on the one hand, a pre-Christian, pagan, magical, heterodox tradition whose roots remain Slavic; on the other – German-Roman Catholicism. There is a conflict between them. The situation of Poland is a borderline one. She cannot unite with the Eastern world religiously, and with the Western ethnically. In geopolitics, Poland remains part of the sanitary cordon separating the Eurasian continent into two parts, which is very convenient for the Anglo-Saxon anti-traditional forces. Poland cannot fully realize its Eurasian-Slavic essence, because it is hindered by Catholicism, nor by its Western European identity, because its own Slavic character, i.e. language, customs, archetypes, climate of places, etc. Poland is always falling victim to the Third Force, as is today’s mondialism and Atlanteanism. Due to this location on the border between Russia and Germany, the problem of the partitions of Poland between the East and the West will always occur in history. It is the result of this sacral-geographic and geopolitical duality. As Toynbee noted, the attempt to build an independent Polish-Lithuanian civilization between these two forces ended in failure. Central European civilization is too weak to withstand the tension between East and West. The countries of this region have to define themselves: either here or there. Polish-Lithuanian civilization did not want to or could not define itself, therefore it had to disappear. It is indeed a dramatic situation.

• Are there any elements in the Polish tradition that you find attractive?

I am definitely closer to the Slavic-Eurasian sources of Polishness, their ethnic and even pagan elements. I am attracted to certain eastern or oriental elements, the culture of minorities. I think the best thing in Polish history is the Jewish tradition in small towns in eastern Poland. Actually, I am interested in everything that was anti-Catholic in Poland: Polish freemasons and occultists, Jan Potocki and Hoene-Wroński, Mienżyński and Dzerzhinsky … They all chose the Eurasian path.

• You are talking about Poland’s position between the East and the West, that is, between Russia and Germany. Meanwhile, many scholars emphasize the greater similarity of Germany, and especially Prussia, to Russia than to England or Spain. Feliks Koneczny even believed that Prussia, like Russia, belonged to the Byzantine and not Latin civilization.

Koneczny was right. Germany is internally divided. Bavaria tends to the West, Prussia to the East. Prussia is such a small Russia inside Germany.

• We have always seen this as the greatest danger for us: a friendly alliance between Germany and Russia.

That’s our job. Unite with Germany and create a powerful continental bloc.

• What about Poland then?

We, the Russians and Germans, understand in terms of expansion and we will never reason otherwise. We are not simply interested in preserving our own state or nation. We are interested in absorbing, through our pressure, the maximum number of categories that complement us. We are not interested in colonizing like the English, but in drawing our strategic geopolitical boundaries without even special Russification, although there should be some Russification. Russia, in its geopolitical and sacral-geographic development, is not interested in the existence of an independent Polish state in any form. It is also not interested in the existence of Ukraine. Not because we don’t like Poles or Ukrainians, but because these are the laws of sacred geography and geopolitics.

Poland has to choose: either Slavic or Catholic identity. I understand it’s hard to separate one from the other, but it’s inevitable. Hitler also could not fight on two fronts, he had to choose: either with England against Russia or with Russia against England, as Haushofer advised him. But Hitler did not want to choose. “I don’t want to tear myself apart, I want to remain myself,” he said, and started a war on two fronts. It plunged Germany, 20 million Russians, and a good chunk of the world. For what? That McDonalds would now open their bars in Berlin, that the Soviet Union would collapse and that NATO soldiers were stationed everywhere. The identity of Germany was so important to Hitler at the time that he did not want to make a choice. In the same way, Poland has to choose, identity is not important. If Poland insists on keeping its identity, it will turn everyone hostile towards itself and will once again become a zone of conflict.

There are nations that can expand to the size of civilization. They then lose their identity, race, and sometimes even language, but that is a risk that must be taken if you want to be an empire. This is the United States, this is Russia. Poland was unable to create its own civilization and must make a choice. I think there is still a possibility for you to make your normal choice, i.e. Byzantine. It requires a lot of courage, nonconformity, unusual forms of action, some skinheads, anarchists, mystics. Polish chaos against the Polish order.

• In a word, from your point of view, all anti-Catholic activities in Poland are beneficial?

Exactly. You have to break Catholicism from the inside, strengthen Polish Freemasonry, support decaying secular movements, promote heterodox and anti-papal Christianity. Catholicism cannot be absorbed into our tradition unless it is deeply reoriented in a nationalist and anti-papal direction. If there was a lodge in Poland like the Irish Golden Dawn, whose leaders, such as William Butler Yeats or Maud Gonne, on the one hand were Catholics, and on the other – fanatical occultists inspired by Celtic culture, then one can have some hope. Such people could decompose Catholicism from within and reorient it towards a more heterodox, even esoteric. Anyway, my friends in Poland tell me that there are groups with you, related to telemism or the achievements of Alistair Crowley.

• Frankly speaking, the opinion that is more widespread in Poland is that if there are forces decomposing Catholicism in Poland, they are closer to the West than the East.

As I said, you find yourself between two clashing blocks, two civilization concepts: Eurasianism and Atlantism, which wants to create a New World Order, i.e. a civilization devoid of tradition, sacrum, metaphysics.

• If this is how the New World Order is presented in Poland, it is almost always added that only Catholicism can be a salvation from total secularization.

Catholicism cannot be a guarantee of defense against the New World Order, because it is a transition stage to this order. I do not believe in such an evolution and such a mutation of Catholicism that it could acquire a Eurasian character. What can we hide a lot … I am not like Ziuganow, who promises every lame orphan on the road something pleasant. Poland is in a tragic geopolitical situation. Both they (ie the New World Order) and we (Eurasians) want to deprive you of your Catholicism. Our offer is better, however, because with us you will at least be able to develop and realize your Slavic identity. So the less influential the pro-Eastern forces in the anti-Catholic lobby, the more tragic your situation becomes. I do hope, however, that you will have forces leaning towards Eurasianism, maybe there will be some synthesis between the extreme right and the extreme left. It is a pity that communism in Poland has never been esoteric, as in Russia …

• Before the war, there was actually only one significant representative of mystical-Gnostic communism in the KPP, Jan Hempel, the author of the Volkist Piast Sermons.

So maybe more hopes should be attached to your extreme right. If your national current broke away from liberalism and turned towards paganism, it would naturally gravitate towards the East. There was, after all, the phenomenon of the anti-Catholic and pagan “Zadruga” before the war.

• What you say reminds me of what I read recently about Russian Christianity. Some of the historians of religion believe that Russia was never thoroughly Christianized, that Christianity was adopted very superficially, and pagan beliefs and customs were still alive among the majority of the common people.

It all depends on what we call Christianity. Orthodoxy and Christianity are two different things. When you say “Christianity”, you mean Catholicism or something analogous to Catholicism. Meanwhile, Orthodoxy is defined as non-Catholicism. So if Catholicism is Christianity, then Orthodoxy is non-Christian. Conversely, if we are Christians, you are not. I am relying not only on the claims of our fathers after the great schism, but also on the eighth and ninth-century authorities such as Photius. Orthodoxy, which is not a religion but a tradition, is much closer to what we call paganism. It embraces and includes paganism. The teaching of the Cappadocian or Palamite Fathers does not completely conflict with pagan norms, but only transforms pre-Christian archetypes in Orthodox contexts. Orthodoxy is more than a religion, both vertically, because it includes paganism, and horizontally, because it is open to metaphysics, which has completely disappeared in post-school Catholicism. Orthodoxy and Catholicism are two completely separate phenomena, tradition and religion are like a whole and a part. Therefore, it is not possible to unite Orthodoxy and Catholicism.

• Specialists in ecumenical dialogue emphasize that between Catholicism and Protestantism, cultural and civilization differences are minimal, but dogmatically there is a gap between them. The situation is different with Catholicism and Orthodoxy: dogmatic differences are small, while cultural and civilizational differences are huge.

Werner Sombarth, developing the theses of Max Weber, stated that not only Protestantism, but also Catholicism was at the source of capitalism. Catholicism with its filioque and the idea of ​​individual salvation. The idea of ​​individual salvation is not a Christian thought, but a typically Catholic one. There is no such concept in Orthodoxy. There is no concept of a unit at all. In Orthodox anthropology the word individual does not appear. As we know, anthropology is the basis for the construction of the entire social system, the entire civilization model. Sombarth believed that Catholic anthropology assumed a specific development of socio-economic relations because it attached great importance to the concept of individuality. Orthodox anthropology, in turn, always emphasized the supra-individual personality. Man then sees himself as part of a larger whole. Therefore, he does not save himself, but someone saves through him. In Catholicism, a man is an individual, and therefore an indivisible whole, in Orthodoxy, a man is a dividum, an individual, and therefore divisible. In Catholicism, man is a finite being, he is responsible for himself – to God, to people, etc. Protestantism has made this conviction even more holistic. In Orthodoxy, a person is part of the Church, a part of the community organism, just like a leg. So how can a person be responsible for himself? Can the leg be responsible for itself? This is where the idea of ​​the state, the total state, comes from. Therefore, the Russians, because they are Orthodox, can be true fascists, unlike artificial Italian fascists like Gentile or the Hegelians there. The real Hegelianism is Ivan Pereswietow – the man who invented the oprichnina for Ivan the Terrible in the 16th century. It was the real founder of Russian fascism. He formulated the thesis that the state is everything and the individual is nothing. The state is salvation, the state is the Church. It is enough to read the writings of our Orthodox saint, Józef of Wołokołamsk, to see that these two organisms are identical, identical. And now this whole organism for salvation, all strive for salvation without crumbling, like one collective soul, one collective body.

• Indeed, in Orthodoxy you have a certain inclination towards apocatastasis, towards the idea of universal salvation …

This is true. The most important thing is that we have no individuality. The individual dissolves into the collective. This is how the Russian works for salvation.

• Whose salvation?

The salvation of the archetype, the salvation of Adam. Through the state, the Russians are striving to save not themselves, but Adam …

• Adam Kadmon, it sounds cabbalistic.

No, this is a holistic approach. In Orthodoxy, it is about the salvation of the Old Testament Adam through the coming of the new Adam, i.e. Christ, nature, while nature is saved through people. The state, especially the holy state, is the instrument of this salvation. That is why the Russian Tsar is an active participant in the mystery of soteriology. After the fall of Byzantium, he became the last guardian of the catechon, a tradition which Charlemagne turned out to be usurper at the turn of the 8th and 9th centuries. It was the Byzantine emperor who was the true emperor of both East and West.

• I have come across the claim that the real split between East and West took place not in 1054 when the Great Schism occurred, nor in 1204 when the Crusaders ravaged Constantinople, but on Christmas 800 when Pope Leo III he put an imperial crown on the head of Charlemagne.

It was a usurpation. Therefore, the imperial function of the West, whether under the Stauffenbergs or the Habsburgs, was always questionable. Because an ecumen can only have one emperor. One of them must be false. According to all the norms of orthodoxy, such a sacred anointed figure, regardless of any negative personal character traits, was the Byzantine emperor, and after the fall of Constantinople, the Russian Tsar. It can be said that all Western philosophy and culture arose from rejecting and ignoring the Byzantine tradition. In the West, the Orthodox version of Christianity or metaphysics is not taken into account at all, it is treated as if it did not exist.

• I think that if in the last millennium there was a process of increasing separation between Catholicism and Orthodoxy, it was a bilateral process. Orthodoxy also isolated itself from Catholicism.

That’s right, but the point is, only one side can be right. If Catholicism is right, then neither Russia nor Serbia have any reason to exist, culture should be Americanized and Protestant, because this is the right direction of development. After all, Protestantism is a child of Catholicism, disgusting, I admit, and obnoxious, but legitimate. So if Orthodoxy is wrong, then one should choose the Protestant way and, as in the Church of England, vote that there is no hell. The right, however, is on the side of Orthodoxy, which remains the most perfect form of traditionalism, sacredness and conservatism. In the beginning, there was East and West. East is paradise, fullness, West is exile, nothingness. Eastern empire – legitimate, western – apostatic. These aren’t just archetypes. There is a great struggle going on between Byzantium and Rome, Russia and the West, Eurasianism and Atlanticism, socialism and capitalism, barbarism and civilization. We do not represent civilization, but culture. We all – Russians, Serbs, Tatars, etc. – represent the barbarian element. Barbarism is life, it is the sacred world of tradition. We live in shacks, beat drums, drink vodka, and we are attacked by Daniel Bell, postmodernism, post-Protestant information society, the New World Order. In this great clash of Atlantic civilization and Eurasian culture, all that lies between us – Poland, Ukraine, Central Europe, and, who knows, maybe even Germany – must disappear, be absorbed.

• Samuel Huntington in his Clash of Civilizations writes that states that are hybrids of two civilizations have no chance of surviving in the shape they are today; that Bosnia, Ukraine, Turkey and Mexico will eventually have to take sides. Huntington’s comments, however, did not apply to Poland or Germany.

Huntington is right: a clash of civilizations is imminent. There is no room for the countries in the middle. I have already talked about Poland. And Germany? What can Germany do? After all, this is an occupied country. The Germans missed their chance during the war. We had to fight with us against England, turn the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact to the West, and then Hitler-Stalin forever. Today, instead of English, Russian and German would be spoken everywhere. The Germans did not go for it and lost. Now there is an American occupation and such “murder” that even your mouth cannot be opened. However, I do hope that Germany will shake off this state of affairs and shed its dependency sooner or later. I am convinced that in the common Eurasian home there will be room for Germans, Poles, French and Italians. We, the Russians, will impose only a barbaric, sacred attitude to life on Eurasia, and how it will be manifested in a particular nation will depend on our own national predispositions. I see Poles, for example, as defenders of Slavic racism. The Slavic element always breaks down the frames of individualism, strives for community.

• You say so much about community, collectivity, but in fact you are an individualist.

How’s that? Why? How do you think so?

• Even here, in the premises of the National-Bolshevik Party, it is enough to look around to see that they all look the same in their black uniforms, they even have a similar facial expression, only the Lord is definitely different from them.

I am just like them. I don’t think about myself, I think about others. I don’t think for myself, I think for others. There are two concepts: personalism and individualism. Individualism is the opposite of community, because the center of the world, a constitutive element of the worldview, becomes the human individual, the individual. There is no place for community or holism here, there is only a rational, logical, relative agreement between individuals. What, in turn, do we propose? We are not against the person, but for understanding them supra-individually. This is, in a sense, the Nietzschean idea. Man is a dynamic phenomenon, constantly overcoming himself. This overcoming means human growth, growth beyond the limits of his individuality. In the vertical dimension, a person then becomes a part of a community, an organ of a certain organism. On the other hand, in the horizontal dimension … someone has to think. Together you cannot think, you can act together. If you mix them all together, then the head of this collective organism that will arise will not be the sum of the individual brains, but one brain, the most enlightened one. There must be a certain gnoseological hierarchy. This communal nature of material unity, the horizontal unity of bodies, contains within itself a hierarchy. Often times, people who fight against individualism are personalists. The spirit of unity, the spirit of community, the spirit of the nation can be manifested in them in a very condensed way. They are not individualists, but separate, discrete incarnations of the all-unity. This is their authority. This is the idea of ​​a monarch, a people’s chief, a Fuhrer. This is the phenomenon of the Russian tsars, but also of Pugachev, Lenin and Stalin. And it’s not that some individualist invents collectivism, because then he would be a fraud, a charlatan, a hypnotist. It is like chemistry: when different substances are mixed together, the lightest ones, the gases, float up the highest. Similarly in society: when different human elements are mixed together, the most subtle ones, i.e. the brains, are at the top. Therefore, for some, this idea of ​​community is concentrated in the brain, in others in the soul, and in others in the legs or hands. Nevertheless, it is the same idea for everyone. In this way, one organism is created – Behemoth (as Carl Schmitt would call him), a Eurasian Tatar-Scythian monster, which includes not only people, but also elements, elements of nature, soil, winds, rivers, mountains. The sublimation of this terrible dark cluster is the Russian monarchs, Stalin … Stalin was not a separate individual, but a collective person, an older brother, a manifestation of Eurasianism in its communist variant.

• You said that Russia’s internal imperative is expansion. But what is the purpose of this expansion, what is the idea behind the postulated ideocracy?

The goal of Russian expansion is total soteriological science. We have felt it for centuries, since the time of Metropolitan Ilarion of Kiev, but it is now more obvious than ever that we are not a nation among many, but that we have a mission to reveal a truth to the world. We want a different end to history than the one proposed by the West. We want a sacred end, not a profane end. We are convinced, and we live it, that we have a certain key to spiritual, eschatological truth. Every Russian knows it. Each.

• What is the essence of this truth?

Our whole thousand-year history is an attempt to reveal this truth, to look for forms of its expression. It is the truth that the West has plunged into its depths, it is the truth about salvation, the transformation of the world, a new pleroma, a new quality of being, resurrection from the dead, the transformation of bodies, the sunlight that should come from the lips of the Great Mother. We Russians, due to our ethnic and religious predispositions, are called to do so. Our whole history, including the last battle of communism against capitalism, are only different attempts to realize the same messianic dream.

• To tell the truth, it is somehow difficult for me to imagine communism as a fight for the sacred in the world. Especially in the times of Stalin, so praised by Lord Stalin, it was a deeply anti-Orthodox movement: churches were demolished and closed, bishops were tortured and murdered, the faithful were imprisoned and sent to Siberia, forced atheization was carried out …

First of all, it was the Orthodoxy that Stalin was destroying that was very incidental – imbued with the spirit of the West, alienated from the nation. Second: the messianic dream I mentioned could live outside Orthodoxy and develop in other forms. Communism was an attempt to liberate this messianism from a purely religious understanding. Perhaps this attempt failed precisely because it was so distant from theology. So I think that in the next expansion we should use all our experiences, both purely sacred and socialist. Socialism is nothing more than a secularized version of Byzantineism, it is Red Byzantium, Orthodoxy in a sectarian, exalted form. It can be said that the people’s monarch, Stalin, with the popular faith, that is, communism, stood against the alienated, lordly, noble, occidental monarchy and the Orthodox Church. I am not such an ardent supporter of the Stalinist system, but I can clearly see the pulsation of our historical existence in communism as well. So if I say my unconditional “yes” to Bolshevism, Lenin and Stalin, it is not because it was an ideal system, but because it was the only solution for us. This time we have not succeeded yet, but the next time we will purify Orthodoxy and communism and we will discard those elements that caused these models to alienate themselves from the nation. Our next stage will be Orthodox communism – Eurasian, missionary, pan-Slavic, philotatar …

• It almost sounds like a postmodern project.

We include a lot, but also exclude a lot. We exclude individualism, the individual, the free market, worldview neutrality, tolerance, and we include barbaric, fanatic and exalted elements. This is not postmodernism, but let’s say postmodern. Postmodern is the objective state in which we live after the victory of the West over us. Moderna is over. Postmodernism is just one answer to the postmodern challenge, the liberal answer. There may also be an anti-liberal response, that is ours – postmodern anti-postmodernism. The reflection of the West breaks down everything into prime factors, while at the same time sterilizing and drying up everything like exhibits in a flowerbed. Our reflection does not deprive us of the aroma of life, even erotic delight with our ideas, it makes us drunk, we are drunk with Eurasia …

• As early as in the 18th century, Nikita Panin described the history of Russia as a polar pulsation of deadness and chaos. Similarly, two centuries later, Yuri Lotman – as jumps in entropy and organization. Today’s journalists often compare the present situation of Russia to the Weimar era in German history …

A very accurate comparison.

• The West is aware of this, therefore it does not want to humiliate Russians, to humiliate their national pride, as it did to Germany after the First World War, when it drew huge contributions from them. The West rather wants to raise Russia’s value, invites it to join the G-7 group, and pumps millions of dollars into the Russian economy. I want to avoid the Weimar scenario …

The West treats Russia very severely. I think that he did not draw conclusions from the Weimar lesson. The more he puts pressure on us, the more he will have to pay for it. It works like a spring: the harder you push, the harder it will hit back. The West is geographic Satan, geographic Antichrist. The West should pay for everything. It would be best to settle it with Chinese, Tatars, Muslims, all this Eurasian nomadism. When I was walking the streets of Paris recently, I suddenly noticed that I was missing something. And I realized it was odorless, sterile, aseptic. The only fragrance in the West is perfume. Earth, air, flowers, trees only started to smell in Poland, and when I returned to Russia, I plunged into the madness of smells. The West is dead land. It will only come back to life when it is settled by Cossacks, Tajiks, and Kazakhs. They will bring life with them, they will bring fragrances.

• You refer to the Orthodox tradition at almost every step. But does Orthodoxy itself admit to your ideas? I talked to many representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church in Moscow and none of them consider you an orthodox believer, you are considered a rather heretic.

Who said that?

• For example, deacon Andrei Kurayev.

And deacon Alexander Mumrikov said that I was fully Orthodox. And what? One deacon’s sentence against the other’s sentence. Fortunately, we do not have Catholicism, where there is the office of the Pope and everyone must obey him. I, too, can safely say that Deacon Kurayev is not fully Orthodox. At the moment, there are two Orthodoxy: the first – living, full of spirit, and the second – official, formalized, and staff. Deacon Kurajew represents the formal, pro-systemic, I would say even profane branch of Orthodoxy. He writes texts that are spiritually Catholic. For example, he believes that the merit of Christianity was an impulse to the development of exact sciences, which caused the desacralization of the cosmos. The Hesychaists would have hailed him as a heretic at once. Fortunately, Orthodoxy is wider than the Church itself and also includes a branch of the Old Believers. I belong to the Moscow Patriarchate myself, but I am in spirit with the Old Believers. Besides, they consider themselves the only true Orthodox. If there is ever a real revival of Orthodoxy, it will come not from the ossified structures of the official Church, but from the depths of the Russian national spirit, which has been fully preserved among the Old Believers.

• And which branch of the Old Believers is closer to you? Circulars or non-circulars?

This division applies to the Białokrynica hierarchy. On the other hand, I am more interested in another division: popowców and bezopowców. I am closer to the poppers who reject priests as more radical. Among them, however, the closest to me is the faction of non-believers who believe that the kingdom of Antichrist has already come, and that it is the Catholic and Protestant West.

• I see that you have a very closed thought system. But what are the chances that the ideas you are preaching will find resonance in society? Observing the Lord, you can say: some haunted idealist is sitting in the basement, something is raving under his breath, but his fantasies have absolutely no effect on people. Oh, another frustration in our century …

I will try to answer this question in three steps. First, even if I am an idealist who sits in the basement and whose ideas play no role, it does not bother me because all the great ideas started with the idealists who sat in the basement and played no role. The fate of the idea is specific. A man who deals with ideas is immersed in a theurgical atmosphere where what is invisible and inaudible appears to him as visible and audible, even in the form of a text or discourse. And even if I had remained unknown to anyone until my death and left no written word behind, what counts is the mere fact of capturing the main vectors of history, the main ideas of civilization.
Second: I am active in the National-Bolshevik Party. It is not a big party, but it has a clear focus: we especially try to influence young people, especially students, who will be the elite of the young generation in the future. We are, after all, the only party that deals with the thoughts of young people. We teach them to think and live. We are concerned with the indoctrination of the next generation. This is not done by anyone in Russia: neither liberals nor communists …

• Television does it.

That’s right, but she forms average and passive people. We, on the other hand, shape people, as Gumilev called them, passionate, above-average, those whom Pareto called counter-relatives of the future. Other nationalist parties, such as the Barkashists, do not form a counter-past, but defensive troops. Their militant organizations are not elites of any kind. We, on the other hand, focus on those who will set the tone for life in Russia in the future, we prepare them conceptually. We organize seminars for them, publish magazines and books. It can be said that our party is purely intellectual. All these pickets or demonstrations are only an addition to the basic task, which is the intellectual preparation of a generation. We already have hundreds of people formed this way across the country.
Third and finally: my ideas are not confined to the party itself. Since 1987, I have been actively involved in the ideologization of the broadly understood patriotic camp. The two largest parties in the present Duma – the communists of Zyuganov and the nationalists of Zhirinsky – took over from me, especially from my earlier texts, the main ideological and geopolitical ideas. Many politicians, whom I did not even know personally, also referred to the ideas I put forward, for example, General Liebiedź.

• Maybe because one of Liebidzia’s advisers was Heydar Dżemal. In 1991, in your publishing house, you published the book Orientacja: Północ.

Our paths with Dżemal diverged because his traditionalism and Eurasianism is Muslim, and mine – Russian. Returning, however, to the previous thread. It does not matter if I personally know Ruckkoy or Khashbulatov who take over my ideas. I am like Ivan Pereswietov, who came up with an oprycznina for Ivan the Terrible. I’m a thought lab. I don’t think for myself, I think for the state, for the nation, for history. I’m waiting for my Ivan the Terrible. All politicians who will be looking for a real and great idea for Russia will come to me sooner or later. Not because I am a great individual and I personally came up with something myself, but because there is an objective idea of ​​Russia, and I am only its exponent. My latest book, Fundamentals of Geopolitics, is read by all opposition politicians and the more serious officials of the Yeltsin administration. The idea of ​​the Moscow-Berlin-Paris axis, which Yeltsin spoke about recently, is directly taken from my writings. If Tokyo is added to that, it is a classic element of the Eurasian geopolitical concept. In addition, many circles in other former Soviet republics are interested in our ideas of a conservative revolution. For example, in Armenia, the group of Robert Kocharian, who came to power at the moment, the so-called the party of the war are people largely shaped in our writings. So to sum up: with or without me – what I am writing about, it will happen anyway. Who will be the subject, who will put these ideas into practice – I do not know and do not undertake to answer. Perhaps it will be the current government that will change its face, it may be some opposing force, it may happen in many years, but it is an inevitable process. I may disappear, but my geopolitical ideas will not disappear.

• It is often said about your environment that you are the Russian counterpart of the Western European New Right. This orientation, assuming that the battle for the fate of mankind would take place not in the political but in the cultural field, proclaimed a kind of Kulturkamp …

Kulturkampf of the New Right is a wonderful idea, Alain de Benoist is a heroic activist and brilliant thinker, but their fight for thirty years has brought no results. They said that the battlefield would be culture, while the Americanization made its greatest triumphs in culture. Right-wing gramcsism is in a deplorable state, it has never gone beyond the margins. How to explain this? I think that the conceptual model of the New Right is very interesting, but the temperament of its European activists is insufficient to implement such ideas. They are too civilized, too conservative, too cowardly, such warm dumplings. So I don’t like comparing with them, because it’s basically comparing with losers. Over the years of the opposition in Russia, I have done such things that they never dreamed of. I was not concerned with the Kulturkampfem, but with the ideological fertilization of serious political forces. I have worked with living history, not archeology. The only man in the West whose breadth of views shocked me was Jean Thiriart, the author of the idea of ​​a Euro-Soviet empire. Before his death, he even came to Moscow; I hosted him here, I introduced him to Jegor Ligaczow, Ziuganow, Baburin …
Europe today has a choice: Eurasianism or Atlanticism. Either he goes with Russia or with America. If the European New Right chooses us, that is, it chooses the barbarian element, and therefore must adopt our methods of operation. You have to organize attacks, deal with sabotage, set fire to, and blow up bridges. True antimondialism is destruction and terror. What is the New Right doing? She turned into an intellectual sect. Overweight and gray men have been gathering at seminars for thirty years and beating foam. Of course you have to read books, but that’s not enough. You have to create a guerilla. If you are against the New World Order then take a knife, put on a mask, go out in the evening and kill at least one yankie. That is why I am so close to the New Left, the Red Brigades, and the Rote Armee Fraktion. Our task is not limited to culture, our task is to make a real revolution. For this we need ideology and intellectual preparation, but without concrete participation in the action, without frontline experience, without combat baptism – it will remain unattainable for us. I do not know if any of the New Right activists have ever been under artillery fire, but our people not only attend meetings or fight barricades, but also go to real wars, e.g. to Transnistria or Yugoslavia. The New Right is just a project, and we are designers and executors, architects and builders. Our future is.

• Thank you for the conversation.

By Brandon Martinez
June 27, 2018 Anno Domini
Martinez Perspective

In Dugin’s 1997 book “Foundations of Geopolitics,” a maniacal screed advocating Russian world domination, the occultist openly calls for unleashing black racists against White America as a subversion strategy.

“Russia should use its special services within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism,” wrote Dugin. Provoking “Afro-American racists” was key to the strategy, Dugin opined, as that would serve to “introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity.” He further encouraged “all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics.”

In this light, the insurgent radical left sweeping America, with Black Lives Matter at the fore, fits neatly within Dugin’s plan to rile up the blacks against White America. Russia has openly been supporting US-based secessionists, as well as separatists in Europe. Leaders of Texan and Californian secession have direct links to Russia. The American libertarian movement, who function as extreme isolationists opposed to any US involvement abroad, are regular pundits on Russia Today and have strong Kremlin ties. They serve Dugin’s plan to isolate America from world affairs, giving Russia a free hand to act and carve out its Eurasian Empire. Crucially, Dugin stresses the need for Russia to align itself with parts of the Muslim world, especially Shiite Iran, and to wield them as an anti-American bulwark of suicidal religious radicals. Stoking up anti-American and anti-Western sentiment across the Middle East and Asia, to isolate the West from these resource rich areas, was key to Dugin’s master plan. He also called for the complete annexation of Ukraine, writing:

Ukraine as a state has no geopolitical meaning, no particular cultural import or universal significance, no geographic uniqueness, no ethnic exclusiveness, its certain territorial ambitions represents an enormous danger for all of Eurasia and, without resolving the Ukrainian problem, it is in general senseless to speak about continental politics. Ukraine should not be allowed to remain independent, unless it is cordon sanitaire, which would be inadmissible.

Those sentiments were echoed by none other than Richard Spencer, who is married to a Russian follower of Dugin.

Dugin’s book reads like a Russian Protocols of Zion, outlining sinister schemes to isolate, undermine and destabilize the US, UK and Europe, strategies which Russia has clearly activated today, thus anointing Russia as the “Third Rome” global superpower. Dugin wrote a more recent paper reiterating some of his 1997 ideas, titled “Principles and Strategy of Coming War,” which outlines Dugin’s strategies for his “spiritual war” against the US and Europe. Notably, influencing and mobilizing dissident elements in America is key to Dugin’s updated strategy. His numerous appearances on the Alex Jones show and his general outreach to Americans during the 2016 election show that he is not simply writing insane texts as intellectual masturbation – he’s actively pursuing these strategies in the public realm.

All of these dirty tactics that Dugin advocates were previously employed by the Russian Communist Party in their war against Western civilization. The communists themselves advocated mobilizing radicalized American blacks against White America, for destabilization purposes. Dugin is simply revamping old communist subversion tactics to infiltrate, divide and conquer the enemies of Bolshevik Russia.

Dugin advances an essentially occultic agenda of chaos magic to instigate the end of the world. A profile on Dugin noted that he,

believes that it is the ultimate theological destiny of Russia to lead modern day Hyperborean societies — including not only Russia, but all of Eurasia, from Korea to India to Portugal — away from a corrupt earthly existence and back to the pure, divine spiritual knowledge of the original Hyperboreans, resulting in the end of our world and the transformation of humanity to a divine existence. (Yes, you read that right — he wants Russia to bring about the end of the world, in pursuit of the spiritual transformation of all of society).

In his research of Russian occultism, journalist Marc Bennetts stumbled on Dugin’s occultist obsession with the apocalypse, writing:

Nevertheless, it appears Dugin’s occult studies continue to have an influence on his apocalyptic thinking: just two years ago, this hardline Russian nationalist thinker lectured in Moscow on the necessity of curtailing the “illusion” that is the planet Earth by bringing about the “end of the world”.

Yet, shockingly, so many lemmings in the alt-right follow and genuflect to this death-worshipping satanist.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
June 29, 2020 Anno Domini

One of the biggest advocates of the Israeli state being behind the September 11 terrorist attacks on America may be a paid gatekeeper for Putin’s neo-Soviet FSB-KGB secret service.

Over the last decade, it seems that many critics/sceptics of controversial 9/11 researcher Christopher Bollyn have failed to completely or correctly interpret the evidence about the self-professed descendant of suspected 16th century witch Anne Bolleyn being some kind of gatekeeper put out in the public to misdirect  9/11 truth research and, consequently, associated subjects of inquiry.

As it turns out, one of the key facts of Bollyn’s history these critics have missed is from his time living on a Kibbutz with his then Jewish wife in Israel. They justly hypothesize that Bollyn may, in fact, be an Israeli Mossad operative working to gatekeep for Israel, but this explanation seems lacking considering the seemingly vast amounts of credible information Bollyn has uncovered about Israel’s involvement in the 9/11 attacks and other false flag events. While much of Bollyn’s research seems quite factual, it may all just be a means to an end for a slick KGB operative seeking to de-legitimize conspiracy research and turn the world against the Kremlin’s much hated foe, the West, as part of a final showdown deception to secure Lenin’s world communist superstate.

Afikim, situated just southwest of the Golan Heights, is the name of the Russian Jewish Kibbutz in Israel in which Bollyn and his first wife Bosmat Merimsky—a Soviet-derived Jew in Israeli military intelligence—lived during the 1970s.  Apparently, he had decided to hang his hat there and work as a lifeguard after travelling through Soviet satellites Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria.[1] It turns out that Afkim is a Moscow-affiliated Marxist kibbutz, much like most of Israel’s Kibbutzim,[2] with a history tied to terrorism, Israel’s Marxist labour movement (Poale Zion), and training of Israeli Defense Forces recruits. Although seemingly Zionist, Poale Zion is affiliated with kibbutz-based Hashomer Hatzair Workers Part of Palestine and the Socialist League of Palestine. Hashomer was, at one time, the sole Zionist political organization in Palestine that recognized the national rights of Palestinian Arabs.[3] This bi-nationalism, it seems, runs common throughout the Marxist Kibbutzim network, even today.

Both KGB and Israeli defectors, like the late Jack Bernstein and former high-ranking Romanian intelligence general Ion Mihai Pacepa, have revealed that the Soviet strategy for the Middle East, known as Operation SIG (Zionist government), is to keep it divided (via funding and arming conflicts on all sides) and to use the result of the conflicts to discredit and demonize the West. This could explain how Israel’s Marxist Kibbutzim network—through which Bollyn may have been trained under Soviet KGB/Mossad instruction—can be Zionist on one hand, and bi-national (pro-Arab) on the other—all the while carrying out Moscow’s Balkanization agenda for the region—and for the world.

You might say, hey, but why is Bollyn so critical of Israel and Zionism? Well, this plays into the dialectic that Operation SIG demands for the region. So long as the true Soviet communistic engineering of the operation is never revealed, the operatives can pretty much say whatever they want, including throwing Israel—the witting fall guy for the Kremlin—under the bus. To support this theory, a consistent anti-Western, pro-Kremlin, pro-Palestine, and pro-Islam bias can be found in Bollyn’s writings. This aligns with the anti-Western narrative of Operation SIG, which seems to be focused at aligning world perception about Zionism to it being a Western “imperialist” creation.[4] As an example of Bollyn’s re-alignment of public perception of Zionism and 9/11, he was one of the first journalists to proclaim the U.S. neocons’ “new Pearl Harbor” motive for executing the 9/11 conspiracy (think PNAC, which lays the blame for 9/11 squarely on the West, with Israel as a secondary player, at best).

At some point, Bollyn allegedly (he tells inconsistent stories about his past) returned to the United States of America in the 1970s and began studies at the University of California at Davis (he has degrees in journalism, history and spent his last year of university in Baltic states studying the psychological effects of Soviet occupation on the native population. Bollyn and his family allegedly lived in Soviet satellite Estonia at some point). It wasn’t until decades later that Bollyn seemed to find his calling as a conspiracy writer, apparently starting with stints at Washington DC-based The Spotlight and at its successor American Free Press. Bollyn would go on to become famous in the conspiracy world writing about the sinking of the Estonia (seemingly the West’s fault), Israel’s involvement in false flag terror attacks around the world—especially 9/11, and the West (and Israel) being responsible for the Euromaidan, which was, in reality, provoked by the Kremlin’s invasion of Ukraine in 2014.

Bollyn was eventually fired from American Free Press (AFP), but it seems unclear exactly why. There is much critical information about Bollyn on the web—largely unsubstantiated but not necessarily false. Fellow conspiracy researchers Michael Collins Piper (also of The Spotlight and AFP) as well as Darryl Bradford Smith and the late Victor Thorn have since denounced Bollyn as some kind of shill and/or fraud with contacts with “high-level intelligence”.[5] Piper, who often referred to Bollyn as “kinky balloon” during his radio broadcast The Piper Report, went so far as to claim that Bollyn, after a private investigation was carried out, was receiving foreign funds and was spending beyond his means. Piper, who died mysteriously shortly before Donald Trump was elected U.S. President, has been a consistent writer, researcher, and patriot movement character. It’s difficult to dismiss his suspicions. Bollyn seems to invert reality by saying that it is Piper and Bollyn’s critics who are the Zionist-controlled opposition and gatekeepers; although, he provides no solid evidence of this. Incidentally, another tidbit Piper revealed about his private investigation of Bollyn was that anyone who began investigating Bollyn wound up in some sort of serious trouble. Piper is dead and Bollyn walks around today unmolested, writing his pro-Kremlin, anti-Western articles and trying to put over questionable younger “patriot” personalities like Adam Green of Know More News.

Like any good conspiracy fraud, if that is indeed what he is, Bollyn may have lied about an attack by Chicago police on his person in 2006[6]—staged, perhaps, to make him look like a threat to the establishment and a whistleblower of sorts (think of Alex Jones using the apparently staged “Bohemian Grove infiltration” to put himself on the conspiracy map). Many doubt the veracity of Bollyn’s claims. Even if the attack were real, it may have had nothing to do with Bollyn being a whistleblower but about him being a Soviet operative—someone definitely of interest to the FBI and U.S. authorities. Bollyn doesn’t seem to provide a plausible motive for why local police would stalk and attack him—allegedly resulting in a broken elbow and being tazed. Perhaps Bollyn leaves the story open ended so that his supporters can use their imagination as to why their star journalist was being attacked by “Zionist” American police. It seems that this possibly staged event led to his firing by AFP, after which point, Piper and others dissociated from Bollyn and began to suspect him of being an intelligence operative.

“Piper has been attacking me since December 2001 when I was invited to speak about 9/11 in Moscow,” Bollyn wrote in a 2009 article attacking Liberty Lobby and lawyer Mark Lane.[7]

It seems that Piper, a veteran researcher/writer with a nose for controlled opposition[8], grew very suspicious of Bollyn. And a trip to Moscow would, no doubt, add to those suspicions. Giving a 9/11 conference in Moscow is not exactly like giving one in the Western world. There is no way that the Kremlin would not have permitted this event to happen at some level.

In his October 21, 2018 article, The Israeli origin of the War on Terror, Bollyn portrays Moscow as the innocent victim of a joint Western-Israeli smear campaign regarding international terrorism:

“Paul’s thesis, International Terrorism: The Propaganda War, examines how the Netanyahu Institute used misinformation to exaggerate the terrorism threat. One of the main points of the misinformation was to link terrorism to the Soviet Union. In this way, the Israelis could delegitimize the Palestinian Liberation Organization in the West as a puppet of Moscow…. Although the Zionist masterminds behind the War on Terror no longer blame Russia for being behind international terrorism, their reason for blaming the Soviet Union, i.e. Russia, has not changed.”[9]

Perhaps now, we are starting to get a clearer picture of what Bollyn’s mission is all about. Could it be that he was sent in by Russia’s special services to infiltrate and join the patriot movement, via Michael Collins Piper and Liberty Lobby, build himself up as a truth teller and then discredit some aspects of the movement and divert the movement from Russia’s involvement in 9/11? Yes, I said Russia’s involvement—to which there is a growing amount of evidence (see my archive of that evidence here).

Later in that article, Bollyn writes, “…the Likud is headed by Benjamin Netanyahu, who hosted the conspiratorial terrorism conference back in 1979. This is why the Palestinians are still locked out of any political process and why the Zionist-controlled media continues to spew anti-Russian propaganda—four decades after the War on Terror was born at the conference at the Netanyahu Institute.”[10] Here, Bollyn feeds the Operation SIG narrative that the Palestinians are not only freedom fighters but are being helped by the righteous Russians in doing so. It’s the “evil West” and the “Zionists” who masterminded it all.

Bollyn seems to figure that as long as he names the “Zionists”, his audience will believe whatever he says. It’s his alibi, it seems. You can find several articles on his website that exonerate Russia, Iran, and other Soviet satellites in the world scheme, and Bollyn’s general narrative seems to be in line with the Soviet-Duginist-Eurasianist neo-Soviet agenda of maligning the West for all global evil, as part of a long-range strategy of bringing the world into the seeming loving arms of the crypto-Bolshevik “Russian Federation” and its Silk Road satellite nations for the final Judeo-Bolshevist world communist conquest. As it turns out, Bollyn has guest appeared at events with Duginist types, like at Moscow’s 2002 International Conference on Globalism and Contemporary Historical Problems with fellow guest “philosopher” Alexander Zinovyev. Bollyn was invited to Iran by Hamed Ghashghavi, the organizer of the Duginist New Horizons Conference. Pictured above is Bollyn with former leader of the Genoese branch of PCI (Italian Communist Party) Giulietto Chiesa, who is connected, naturally, with Aleksandr Dugin. In 2018, as part of a  U.S. court order for Iran to pay restitution to 9/11 victims, Bollyn, alongside Dugin and dozens of other Russophiles, put his name in the hat to vouch for the Islamic Republic of Iran in denying its role in the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Since Iran is a Soviet satellite, this would fit Bollyn’s apparent agenda as a Kremlin gatekeeper.

Notes:

[1] Cohen, Nussbaum Debra, 9/11 truther’s contorversial speech at hipster Brooklyn bastion draws protesters, police, August 9, 2016, Haaretz

[2] Bernstein, Jack, Matzpen, The Communist Party Israel, and the kibbutzim network, 1985 – https://fitzinfo.net/2020/05/21/matzpen-the-jewish-communist-party-of-israel-and-the-kibbutzim-network/

[3] Beinin, Joel, Was the Red Flag Flying There?: Marxist Politics and the Arab-Israeli Conflict in Egypt and Israel, 1948–1965. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990. pp. 27–28

[4] Fitzpatrick Informer, Operation SIG archive – https://fitzinfo.net/operation-sig/

[5] On the Subject of 9/11 Shills and Disinfo: the case of Bolyn & Hufschmid – http://pascasher.the-savoisien.com/2009/04/on-the-subject-of-911-shills-and-disinfo-the-case-of-bolyn-hufschmid.html

[6] Christopher Bollyn attacked by FBI – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uqr35lW9kN0

[7] Bollyn, Christopher, The Liberty Lobby’s Mark Lane and the Jonestown Massacre, October 16, 2009 – https://bollyn.com/the-liberty-lobbys-mark-lane-and-the-jonestown-massacre/

[8] Piper, Michael Collins, ‘Controlled Opposition’—
The Soviet ‘Trust’ Model for Infiltration & Manipulation, 2006, American Free Press, pgs. 64-66. –https://fitzinfo.net/2018/03/08/controlled-opposition/

[9] Bollyn, Christopher, The Israeli origin of the War on Terror, October 21, 2018 – https://www.bollyn.com/the-israeli-origin-of-the-war-on-terror-2/

[10] Ibid

“I am for black people. White civilization—its cultural values, the lying, inhuman model of the world built by it—has not justified itself. Everything is heading towards the beginning of white pogroms on a planetary scale. Russia is saved only because we are not pure white. Robber transnational corporations, the oppression and suppression of everyone else, MTV, blue and pink—these are the fruits of a white civilization that must be eliminated. Therefore, I am for red, yellow, green, black—just not for white. I wholeheartedly stand on the side of the people of Zimbabwe. ”

—Alexander Dugin

By Mark Sedgwick
München–Berlin 2012 Anno Domini

Excerpt from The New Age of Russia
Occult and Esoteric Dimensions – Part I | Part II | Part III
Pgs. 284-292

Traditionalism as a Russian phenomenon

Traditionalism in Russia followed two lines of development, one unusual (in international terms) under Dugin, and one more usual under Iurii Stefanov (1939–2001) and then Artur (Arsenii) Medvedev (1968–2009). This second line is a post-Soviet development, and so does not show the influence of Soviet occult dissident culture. The differences between the first and second lines, then, are instructive.

Stefanov discovered Guénon in the Library of Foreign Languages, (50) rather as Stepanov discovered him in the Lenin Library, but was a well-regarded translator of French literature, not a dissident, and not a member of a circle such as the Iuzhinskii Circle. Immediately after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Stefanov published a number of articles on Guénon in the journal Questions of Philosophy (Voprosy filosofii), a serious philosophical journal published by the Russian Academy of Sciences but with a somewhat wider readership than such journals normally have. A number of Russian intellectuals who read this journal became interested in Traditionalism, including Artur Medvedev, then a young history graduate from the Russian State Humanities University. After Stefanov’s death, Medvedev became Russia’s most prominent non-political Traditionalist, (51) as founder and editor of the journal Magic Mountain (Volshebnaia gora), which has published one or two issues each year since 1993, (52) each containing around 300 pages.

Magic Mountain acts as a focus for non-political Russian Traditionalism, following a pattern well established in the West, where Guénon’s own journal Études traditionnelles formed the initial focus for the development of Traditionalism, and where similar journals have been established in every country where Traditionalism has become established. (53) Like its Western equivalents, Magic Mountain contains translations of classic Traditionalist texts, translations of classic non-Traditionalist spiritual writers such as Mullah Sadra, new articles, and book reviews. Most of the new articles are by Russian or Russian- speaking Traditionalists, but Magic Mountain also translates articles by contemporary Western Traditionalists, linking Russian Traditionalism with that elsewhere. (54) Medvedev estimated that over the years he has published some 200 different authors. (55) Medvedev did not in general accept purely political articles, but did publish Golovin and some followers of Dugin and Dzhemal. (56)

The non-political Traditionalist circle around Magic Mountain also resembles Western models with regard to the type of person who contributes to it, though perhaps with a heavier than usual emphasis on poets and academics, probably as a result of the lower bar to entry for ideas into Russian intellectual life noted above. Like non-political Traditionalists in the West, many of Magic Mountain’s authors also publish books on various subjects which are not Traditionalist, but in which Traditionalist perspectives are reflected. (57)

Post-Soviet Russia, then, provides conditions in which Traditionalism can flourish in much the same way that it has flourished in the West. Where the Magic Mountain circle differs from Western models, however, is that it is not associated with a Sufi order or any other distinct spiritual community. In the West, such groups normally follow Guénon’s example in matching their intellectual interests with spiritual activity, most frequently in the form of a Sufi order, but sometimes also in the form of a Masonic lodge. This is not the case for either line of Russian Traditionalism, that associated with Magic Mountain or that associated with Dugin. Only very few Russian Traditionalists have converted to Islam over the years, and in general they have been drawn to Shi’ism rather than Sufism, largely as a result of the influence of Dugin’s associate from the Iuzhinskii Circle, Dzhemal, who is himself Shi’i. (58)

Both Dugin and Medvedev explain this difference between Russian and Western Traditionalism in terms of Russian Orthodoxy. According to Medvedev, Stefanov was interested in Kabbalah and Gnosticism, but always saw himself as an Orthodox Christian. Similarly, the spiritual consequences for Medvedev himself of his encounter with Guénon and Stefanov were that he began regular Orthodox Christian practice (at baptism he assumed the name Arsenii). (59) Dugin, too, follows Orthodox Christian practice, though as an Old Believer, of the Edinoverie. (60) He argues in Metaphysics of the Gospel that the Christianity that Guénon rejected was Western Catholicism. Guénon was right in rejecting Catholicism, Dugin argues, but wrong in rejecting Eastern Orthodoxy, of which he knew little. Orthodoxy, unlike Catholicism, had never lost its initiatic validity and so remains a valid tradition to which a Traditionalist may turn. (61)

This emphasis on Russian Orthodoxy is the one way in which both lines of Russian Traditionalism differ from Western norms, and the explanation seems to be Russian (rather than Soviet). This is suggested partly by the fact that it is common to Dugin’s Soviet-era Traditionalism and to Magic Mountain’s post-Soviet Traditionalism, and partly by parallels outside Russia. Traditionalist Sufism is also unknown in Turkey, where its absence is explained by the abundance of pre-existing non-Traditionalist Sufi orders, (62) and in Iran, where Sufism has a different history, and where the absence of Traditionalist Sufism (63) is explained by the abundance of pre-existing alternative expressions of Islamic esotericism. (64) In the West, pre-existing Catholic alternatives have attracted only a tiny handful of Traditionalists, and pre-existing Protestant alternatives have attracted none. There have been a number of Traditionalists in the West who have turned to Christianity rather than Sufism, but in its Russian or Greek Orthodox forms. One of these, the French writer Jean Biès (b. 1933), has made much the same arguments as Dugin, and was evidently a source for the first version of Dugin’s The Metaphysics of the Gospel. (65) The implication seems to be, then, that Western Traditionalists create Traditionalist Sufi orders because they cannot find a pre-existing religious practice that satisfies them, but that when a satisfactory esoteric religious practice does already exist—in Turkey, Iran, and evidently also in Russia—this need does not arise. The substitution of Russian Orthodoxy for Sufism, then, reflects Russian conditions.

Dugin’s Eurasianism as a post-Soviet phenomenon

Traditionalism, then, is of Western origin, but its unusual emphasis on Russian Orthodoxy is of Russian origin. The Magic Mountain circle is of post-Soviet origin, and in other respects close to Western Traditionalist norms. Dugin’s Traditionalism, in contrast, differs from those norms, and reflects the characteristically late-Soviet circumstances of the Iuzhinskii Circle.

The distance between Dugin’s Traditionalism and Western norms were justified by Dugin in his 2002 Filosofiia traditsionalizma. In the first chapter of this book, Dugin argues that what Guénon really developed was a form of language, a “meta-language”—in fact, though Dugin does not use the word, a sort of dialectic. Guénon’s distinction between modernity and tradition is, Dugin argues, as fundamental as Marx’s distinction between labor and capital, but “even more fundamental, even more radical.” Guénon’s dialectic has to be used, however, not merely repeated, and Dugin is highly critical of Western Traditionalists for simply repeating Guénon with “very small deviations,” which he sees as “a kind of intellectual hobby” like stamp-collecting, or a form of sadomasochism. (66) Dugin’s style, incidentally, sometimes shows something of the “literary shock tactics” found in Mamleev’s work, which Rovner ascribes to Gurdjieff. (67)

Dugin argues instead for what he calls “Post-Guénonianism,” the application of Guénon’s dialectic to changing and developing circumstances, which is necessary since “the modern world is degrading. As a set of anomalies, it is going from bad to worse.” This application allows, for example, the realization that “Soviet or Chinese communism contains more elements of the language of Tradition (however paradoxical and contradictory in expression) than modern Protestant theology.” (68) Post-Guénonianism is, according to Dugin, essential:

All the events around us (the crash of the ruble, military conflict, a government’s resignation, new discoveries in archeology) are the struggle between two opposing camps. One pole: a tiny Post-Guénonian camp, almost non-existent, like a grain of sand in the desert. The other: a giant liberal camp, the language of modernity, which claims global supremacy. (69)

As a result:

Implementation of the Post-Guénonian program is the single main state, national, social and cultural challenge. We have only one author, who must be read: René Guénon. We have only one objective: to understand what he meant to do. His thinking is our way of thinking, his language is our language… Without this, any change of government, any disaster and any social changes (even if positive) are metaphysically zero, because without Post-Guénonianism there is no spirituality, no social justice, no life–nothing. (70)

The principle vehicle for the implementation of “the Post-Guénonian program” is his Eurasianism. Eurasianism was originally developed in Prague, Berlin, and Paris during the early 1920s by Russian emigré intellectuals, notably the geographer Petr Savitskii, the linguist Prince Nikolai Trubetskoi, and Nikolai Alekseev, a legal philosopher, (71) building on the nineteenth century Slavophiles and Pan-Slavists. The Slavophiles defined a Slavic identity by contrast with that of Europe, emphasizing the Slavs’ religion and social solidarity in contrast to the supposed dry rationality and moral decadence of Europe, drawing on Romantic critiques of early modernity. (72) The Eurasians of the 1920s extended their criticisms of Europe, and replaced the Slavs with Eurasia, defined as Russia and the peoples of the Eurasian steppe. (73) Dugin modified this definition of Eurasia in line with the work of two non-Russian interwar intellectuals, the British geographer Sir Halford Mackinder and the German geopolitical theorist Karl Haushofer, which pitted a “Eurasian heartland” consisting of Germany and Russia against an Atlantic world comprising maritime nations predisposed toward free trade and democratic liberalism. (74)

Dugin’s Traditionalism, which had already embraced Russian Orthodoxy, fitted well with this Eurasian-Atlantic model. Eurasia, as defined by Mackinder and Haushofer, and led by Russia, could be identified with Tradition and the sacred, building on the original Slavophile conception of the Slavic identity. The Atlantic world, in contrast, could be identified with decline, modernity, and the absence of spirituality, building on the original Slavophile conception of an “other” characterized by dry rationality and moral decadence. The result of this combination was the geopolitical philosophy underlying Dugin’s 1997 Geopolitical Foundations, the book which—as has been noted—first drew public attention to him. The same geopolitical revision of Traditionalism forms the basic creed of the Eurasian Movement, which has been modified further to accommodate perspectives associated with the Western New Right, and especially with the French writer Alain de Benoist (b. 1943). (75)

One reason why Geopolitical Foundations and Dugin’s Eurasianism have enjoyed such success is that the definition of the opposing Atlantic and Eurasian blocs reflects well-established pre-Soviet Russian and, especially, Soviet models. The identification of America as the chief representative of modernity, and so as Russia’s chief adversary, is a comfortable continuation of Cold War realities. The Eurasian bloc is a continuation of the old Soviet Union and Waryeah,saw Pact, changed principally by Dugin’s inclusion of Iran and Turkey, a change in which Dugin follows a long-established trend, since Russian rulers from Catherine the Great to Stalin have seen these two countries as natural appendages to the Russian sphere.

Eurasianism provides, to those who want it, an ideological explanation of the continuation of a pattern of confrontation that has lost its original, Soviet-era ideological justification. It is also well adapted to post-Soviet conditions because of one feature it takes directly from Guénonian Traditionalism, the belief in the existence of a single original and perennial Ur-religion. This is an excellent basis for religious pluralism, and religious pluralism is urgently needed in post-Soviet Russia. One of the most popular forms of Russian nationalism has always been based in, or at least expressed in terms of, Orthodoxy. This, however, necessarily excludes Russia’s non-Orthodox inhabitants, and thus easily becomes a force towards fragmentation—the precise opposite of what most nationalists seek. Traditionalist perennialism, however, provides the solution. On the basis of a shared perennial truth, Dugin can easily include Muslims and Jews in his Eurasian Movement (as he does), and propose an Orthodox alliance with Muslim nations, whether former Soviet republics or neighboring states such as Iran and Turkey. The Eurasian approach to Jews is complex, welcoming “traditional” Jews while rejecting “cosmopolitan” ones, concerning whom established anti-Semitic discourse may be used.

This seems to be one reason for the adherence to the Eurasian Movement of Mufti Talgat Taj al-Din, the shaykh al-Islam of European Russia and Siberia, an office first established by Catherine the Great in 1789, and then re-established in 1942. Some of Taj al-Din’s views are close to perennialism, possibly for political reasons. He suggested in 1992, for example, that the Tartars’ pre-Islamic worship of Tengri (Tengriianstvo) should be regarded as an early form of monotheism, and was instrumental in the 1998 construction of a mosque adorned with stained-glass windows bearing the image of the cross and of the Star of David. (76) Other reasons for Taj al-Din’s participation in the Eurasian movement include the characterization of Salafism (what he calls “Satanic Wahhabism”) as modernist which Dugin shares with most other Traditionalists, and Dugin’s anti-Americanism, which Taj al-Din shares. He announced after the American invasion of Iraq in 2003, for example, that resistance to the Americans constituted jihad and was thus a religious duty. This caused some consternation in the Kremlin, which for a while boycotted him. (77)

A further feature of Dugin’s Eurasianism that may be a response to post- Soviet conditions is its apocalypticism. All Traditionalists are apocalyptic in some sense, since the decline that they see as producing modernity is irreversible and marks the start of a new cycle. Dugin’s work (if not his public media pronouncements), however, has an unusually strong emphasis on the apocalypse, from the title of his 1997 hit radio program “Finis Mundi,” to remarks made in conversation. (78) The reasons for this are not clear, but may well be related to Russia’s traumatic history since the collapse of the Soviet Union. As Dugin wrote in Geopolitical Foundations, these events “are difficult to understand unless interpreted as a sign of the times, announcing the proximity of the climax.” (79)

Conclusion

Dugin’s public positions, then, may seem unremarkable, but are informed by political positions that are more remarkable, and which themselves derive from central intellectual positions of Western origin, modified partly in accordance with Russian and post-Soviet conditions, but still bearing the stamp of Soviet occult dissident culture. Soviet occult dissident culture produced the hothouse atmosphere of the Iuzhinskii Circle within which the young Dugin read an unusually eclectic variety of occultist works of Western origin, including Guénon and Evola. The intellectual preparation of the members of that Circle made such authors more acceptable than they would have been in the West, and the highly problematic Soviet version of modernity may have made them especially appealing.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, with access to both a wider range of sources and a wider public, Dugin developed his Soviet-era Traditionalism into post-Guénonian Eurasianism, bringing in pre-Soviet Russian elements such as the Eurasianism of the 1920s emigration and Russian Orthodox practice. The result was then adjusted to post-Soviet conditions by the definition of Eurasian and Atlantic blocs that reproduced the battle lines of the Cold War.

Dugin is also a product of Soviet culture in one other way: the extent to which he attributes power to ideas. When I first met Dugin, he described Guénon to me as “an undiscovered Marx,” (80) borrowing (I later learned) from the French Traditionalist René Alleau. (81) Soviet Marxism embodied the power of the idea, if not in quite the way that had originally been intended. Dugin’s belief in the potential power of another idea, in the power of correct analysis, is not without parallel outside Russia, but is still redolent of Soviet culture.

Notes:

50  Artur Medvedev, interview, Moscow, January 2006.

51  This article uses “non-political Traditionalist” in the sense in which I use “spiritual Traditionalist” in Against the Modern World.

52  Medvedev, interview. Where no other source is given, information on Medvedev and his group comes from Medvedev. This journal, named after Thomas Mann’s novel, was initially intended to be a literary and philosophical publication, a summit where intellectuals of various persuasions might meet, but from its second issue it became increasingly Traditionalist.

53  In 2010 there are similar journals in several languages, of which the most important are Con- naissance des religions and La Règle d’Abraham (in French), Sophia and Sacred Web (in Eng- lish, published in the United States and Canada, respectively), Symbolos and Revista de Estu- dios Tradicionales (in Spanish, published in Spain and Argentina, respectively), and Rivista di Studi Tradizionali (in Italian, 1961–2003).

54  Comments based on a review is issues 9 to 11 of Volshebnaia gora. The Western authors do not always know they are being translated (I myself did not at the time).

55  Medvedev, interview.

56  Dzhemal, for example, first published what is generally considered his most important spiritual work– Orientatsiia Sever (now available at kitezh.onego.ru/nord) – in Volshebnaia gora. These comments are based on a review of the tables of contents of several issues, and discus- sions with Medvedev about the various authors.

58  Ali Turgiev, interview, Moscow, January 2006.

59  Medvedev, interview.

60  Vladimir Karpiets, interview, Moscow, January 2006. Edinoverie, unlike most varieties of Old Belief, recognizes the authority of the Patriarch, and is in return recognized by the mainstream Orthodox church. Dugin’s political action may be inspired by Traditionalism, but it takes place within Russia, and is facilitated by good relations with the Church.

61  Dugin, Metafizika blagoi vesti (2000) chapter 22, arctogaia.org.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=270.

62  Turkish informant, Istanbul, April 1999.

63  Apart from one very small branch of the Maryamiyya.

64  Shahram Pazuki, interview, Tehran, January 2001.

65  The original URL of Dugin’s “La Métaphysique de la bonne nouvelle” was web.redline.ru/~arctogai/bies.htm (accessed May 31, 1997).

66  Dugin, Filosofiia traditsionalizma, 43.

67  Rovner, “Gurdzhievskoe dvizhenie.”

68  Dugin, Filosofiia traditsionalizma, 46.

69  Ibid., 49–50.

70  Ibid, 50.

71  Marlène Laruelle, L’ideologie eurasiste russe, ou comment penser l’empire (Paris: L’Harmattan,

1999), 62.

72  For the Slavophils and Pan-Slavists, Laruelle, L’ideologie eurasiste russe, 34–39.

73  Ibid., 39.

74  Sedgwick, Against the Modern World, 226.

75 Anton Shekhovtsov, “Aleksandr Dugin’s Neo-Eurasianism: The New Right à la Russe,” Reli- gion Compass 3/4 (2009), 697–716.

76  Marlène Laruelle, “L’appartenance à l’Islam comme critère politique? La politisation des directions spirituelles et la constitution de partis musulmans en Russie, ” In: Islam et politique en ex-URSS (Russie d’Europe et Asie centrale) eds. Marlène Laruelle, S. Peyrouse (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2005).

77  Ibid.

78  For example, in January 2006, Dugin commented on the common ground between him and American Neo-Conservatives, and I suggested that his views were hardly likely to encourage good relations with them or with America. Dugin’s response was “You forget that I am an apocalyptic.”

79  Dugin, Osnovy geopolitiki, 97, quoted in Marlène Laruelle, “Aleksandr Dugin: A Russian Version of the European Radical Right?” Woodrow Wilson Center Occasional Paper #294 (2006), 6.

80  Interview, Moscow, August 1999.

81  René Alleau, “De Marx á Guénon : d’une critique ‘principielle’ des sociétés modernes,” in René Guénon (Les dossiers H, vol. 3), eds. Pierre-Marie Sigaud, Jean Tourniac (Paris: L’Age d’homme, 1984), 192–202.

By Mark Sedgwick
München–Berlin 2012 Anno Domini

Excerpt from The New Age of Russia
Occult and Esoteric Dimensions – Part I | Part II | Part III
Pgs. 277-284

Dugin’s despair: The Iuzhinskii Circle as a Soviet phenomenon

Dugin’s despair was of Soviet origin. Dugin was born in 1962, allegedly into the Soviet nomenklatura as the son of a general in the GRU (military intelligence).(19) At the age of 18, however, he encountered occult dissident culture in the form of the “Iuzhinskii Circle,” (20) so-called because it originally met in an apartment in Iuzhinskii Lane. The Iuzhinskii Circle was an informal group that had been established in the 1960s by the poet Evgenii Golovin (1938–2010), the novelist Iurii Mamleev (b. 1931), and a graduate of the Moscow Institute of Philosophy, Vladimir Stepanov. By 1980, when Dugin entered the circle, Mamleev had emigrated to America, and Golovin no longer attended much; leadership had passed to Stepanov. (21) It is not clear that it was still referred to as the Iuzhinskii Circle at this point, but the label is anyhow used in this article, since no better label is available.

The Iuzhinskii Circle had originally been established in search of all forms of occult knowledge, starting with yoga and Sufism, but had gradually come to concentrate on the work of Georgii Gurdjieff (1866 [?]–1949), (22) the Greek-Armenian who, after an early career in the Russian Empire, had emigrated to Paris and there established one of the most enigmatic and important alternative religious movements of the twentieth century. (23) The Iuzhinskii Circle was not, however, an “authentic” Gurdjieff group, which, as Arkady Rovner argues, would have been impossible in “the environment of cultural isolation of Soviet Russia.” It, like other such occult dissident groups, necessarily developed its understandings on the basis of the limited material its members could find (normally in the Lenin Library), (24) often developing this material in idiosyncratic ways. Its interpretation of the Gurdjieff “work” was somewhat different from that known at Gurdjieff’s own Institute for the Harmonious Development of Man outside Paris, for example, and included a strong emphasis on the use of “shock,” “tests” of obedience (such as going out for a week wearing one brown shoe and one black one), (25) and prolonged bouts of drunkenness— including, allegedly, a party for Golovin’s birthday that lasted for five months. (26)

By the time that Dugin joined the circle, “excess in all forms” had become the norm, according to Dugin also a form of revolt. (27) As well as the consumption of significant quantities of alcohol, this excess included sexual experimentation. Dugin’s first wife, Evgeniia Debrianskaia (b. 1953), whom he met in the Iuzhinskii Circle, was later one of two co-founders of the Association of Sexual Minorities, (28) which became the Moscow Gay and Lesbian Union. Excess, however, was matched by serious discussion and by reading, carried out in a variety of languages, which members of the circle often taught themselves. (29) Dugin, for example, is an accomplished linguist, said to read nine or ten languages. (30)

Dugin’s encounter with occult dissident culture in the form of the Iuzhinskii Circle changed his life in several ways. Its immediate effect was to turn him into a dissident, one of those arrested by the KGB in 1983 after a party in a painter’s studio during which he had sung what he describes as “mystical anti-Communist songs.” As a result, he was expelled from the Institute of Aviation, where he had been studying. For some years after this he worked as a street sweeper. (31) Another effect was to introduce him to people with whom he would remain in contact until today, including Gaidar Dzhemal (b. 1947), with whom Dugin took his first political steps during the closing years of the Soviet Union, when both men joined Pamiat’, the first non-Party mass political organization in Soviet history, and one opposed to perestroika. (32) Dzhemal, like Golovin and Mamleev, lectured for Dugin’s “New University” in the late 1990s and early 2000s, (33) despite by then having adopted political positions that were different from Dugin’s. Dzhemal, for example, became one of Russia’s best known Islamists, and despite an early interest in Traditionalism, no longer describes himself as a Traditionalist. (34)

The most important effect on Dugin of the Iuzhinskii Circle, however, was to introduce him to a wide range of occult writers and thought. These, the origin of Dugin’s Traditionalist metaphysics, and thus of his political and public positions, will be considered below.

The Iuzhinskii Circle, the location of Dugin’s “ultimate despair” and of his discovery of the metaphysics that would remain central to the fundamental intellectual level of his later activity, was a phenomenon characteristic of late Soviet culture. Circles of friends exist everywhere, but late-Soviet circles such as the Iuzhinskii Circle differed from those found elsewhere in two important respects: the talent and intellectual quality of their members, and their compactness and thus their significance for their members. Systems such as the contemporary Western one afford talented and clever people many opportunities for a variety of activities, with the result that such people tend to be busy, and so meet only occasionally, and do not generally form significant circles of close friends, at least after they leave university. Post-university circles, then, have little impact on them. The late Soviet system, in contrast, rewarded only certain types of talent, leaving other types of talent unoccupied, and thus providing unusually talented recruits for circles such as the Iuzhinskii Circle. The late Soviet system also ensured, through the activities of the state security apparatus, that such circles were compact. The Iuzhinskii Circle is reported by Rovner not to have been too worried about informers because of a conviction that “informers do not read [Jakob] Böhme.” (35) This was probably true, but isolating the Circle from all those who did not read Böhme necessarily resulted in a high bar to entry. Circles of friends in systems without an intrusive security apparatus have lower bars to entry, and so are less compact. The late Soviet circle, then, was an instance of a very special social formation, similar to a religious sect. One characteristic of a sect is that it is of great significance for its members’ lives. Another is that the mental world within it tends to develop with little reference to society in general, (36) and so—unrestrained—can easily go in unusual and surprising directions.

The Iuzhinskii Circle was also a distinctly late-Soviet phenomenon because of its eclecticism—the very wide variety of occult and esoteric writings in which it was interested. Esoteric groups in the West, for example, commonly follow one particular line. Western followers of Gurdjieff generally read Gurdjieff, P. D. Ouspensky, and other writers of the “Fourth Way.” They do not generally read the Traditionalist writers whom Dugin encountered via the Iuzhinskii Circle, as in the West the two movements do not overlap. To the extent that they do have any relations, those relations are generally hostile. In late Soviet Russia, however, only some of the works of the writers of the “Fourth Way” were available. The Lenin Library did not intentionally stock esoteric or occultist works in foreign languages, and had a somewhat random collection of them. Anything that could be found, then, was valuable, was read, and was discussed, not only in the Iuzhinskii Circle but also in the wider group of readers in the Lenin Library who were interested in the occult. Many of these knew each other, and met and talked there; Rovner describes such readers as almost living in the Lenin Library. (37) Dugin remains remarkably eclectic to this day, (38) and this eclecticism is a continuation of Soviet occult dissident culture.

One further way in which the Iuzhinskii Circle was a phenomenon characteristic of late Soviet culture was the prior intellectual formation of its members. Though all were clever and talented—Jakob Böhme is not easy reading, after all—few if any were trained in the rigorous application of critical and analytic skills. Dugin, for example, was almost entirely self-taught: he received no formal higher education in the humanities. The doctorate that later allowed him to become a professor of sociology was awarded in 2004 by the Rostov Institute of Law in Rostov-on-Don, (39) not one of Russia’s leading academic institutions. Although others in the Iuzhinskii Circle had received higher education, Soviet higher education did not encourage the questioning and critical analysis that are the marks of a good education in the humanities in the West.

There was also a difference between the scope of acceptable knowledge in the late Soviet Union and the West. One of the standard definitions of “esoteric” used by social scientists is, of course, “rejected knowledge.” (40) Such definitions are usually followed by examples that illustrate the rather narrow scope of rejected knowledge in the West: the study of flying saucers is often given. (41) The scope of rejected knowledge in the Soviet Union, however, was rather wider. Esoteric authors were not just in the same category as flying saucers, but in the same category as Adam Smith and Isaiah Berlin.

This is one explanation for a striking difference between the reception of occult and esoteric works in the Iuzhinskii Circle—and indeed in Russia as a whole—and in comparable environments in the West. In the West, esoteric and occultist writers are not taken seriously in mainstream intellectual life, while in Russia they may be. This is partly a question of fashion—it is hard otherwise to explain why René Guénon (discussed below) is not acceptable in the footnotes of Western academic papers, though Mircea Eliade and Frantz Fanon are—but it is also a question of Soviet circumstances: less training in intellectual rigor and critical skills, and a far wider scope of “rejected knowledge.”

Late Soviet circumstances, then, encouraged the formation of circles such as the Iuzhinskii Circle, and determined their nature. In contrast to Western norms, such circles collected more talent, were more compact (and so more sectarian) but also more eclectic. If they had much higher barriers to entry for individuals than the Western norm, they also had much lower barriers to entry for ideas, partly by necessity, and partly as a consequence of the prior intellectual preparation of their members and partly as a consequence of the wider scope of “rejected knowledge.”

Dugin’s metaphysics: Traditionalism as a Western phenomenon

The single most important writer Dugin encountered through the Iuzhinskii Circle was René Guénon (1886–1951), whose work had been introduced to the Circle—along with that of another Traditionalist, Julius Evola (1897–1974)— by Stepanov. Guénon was, Dugin wrote in 2002, “the most important man of the twentieth century.” (42) Students at Moscow State University who took Dugin’s course on the sociology of Russian society in 2009 found five books by Guénon and four books by Evola on their readings lists, along with more standard titles by Émile Durkheim, Claude Lévi-Strauss, and Jean Baudrillard. (43)

René Guénon is the founder of the Traditionalist movement. (44) His early career in Paris during the belle époque was typical of activities in the esoteric milieux of his time. As a young man, he joined the Martinist Order of “Papus,” Gérard Encausse (1865–1916). This was a quasi-Masonic order which derived ultimately from the Theosophical Society, and enjoyed considerable—if brief— success, mostly in France, but also in late-imperial Russia. (45) After the First World War, Guénon distanced himself from these milieux, became a severe critic of the occultism of the period, and attracted Roman Catholic patronage. He continued to develop various ideas of esoteric origin, notably perennialism (discussed below), and so lost Catholic patronage. He later dismissed contemporary Christianity as esoterically bankrupt. His mature philosophy was expressed in several books, many articles by him and his followers, and a long-running journal, Études traditionnelles.

There are three crucial elements in Traditionalism. Taken individually, none of these are unique to Traditionalism; what is unique is their combination. The first and most widespread element is perennialism, a belief in the existence of a single original Ur-religion known as the Tradition, from which Traditionalism takes its name. This perennial Tradition is a major theme in Western esotericism. It dates back to the work of Marsilio Ficino (1433–1499) and Agostino Steuco (1497–1548) at the time of the Renaissance, and is found thereafter not only in occultist and esoteric writings, but also in the more mainstream work of the philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646–1716). (46) The second element is a conviction that progress is an illusion, and that the real dynamic of history is relentless decline. Modernity is the lowest stage of decline, when the Tradition has been almost entirely lost. Traditionalism, then, is fiercely anti-modernist. The third element is a conviction that something can and should be done about this, either by following a traditional esoteric path within a traditional exoteric framework—Guénon’s solution—or by spiritually motivated political activity—Evola’s solution. For Guénon, the model was the brahmin priest, and for Evola, the model was the kshatriya spiritual warrior. Evola is sometimes described as a fascist, but was never a member of the Fascist Party, which he saw as insufficiently radical, and with which he was sometimes in conflict.

By the start of the Second World War, Guénon had moved to Egypt and converted to Islam, the exoteric framework within which he pursued the esoteric, Sufism. His followers by then included French Freemasons, European Sufis, and Rightists in Italy and Romania, inspired also by Evola. After the end of the Second World War and Guénon’s death, these streams diverged. There is relatively little information about Traditionalist Freemasons. Several groups of Traditionalist Sufis came into being, none of which were large but some of which were influential, given that their members were often persons of importance in European and American cultural and intellectual life. Traditionalist Rightism developed most in Italy where, during the 1970s, the works of Evola became the chief inspiration for activists who were at one point responsible for an average of 80 terrorist incidents a month. (47)

As an anti-modernist philosophy, Traditionalism has most appeal to those with problematic experiences of modernity. In the West, it has generally appealed to intellectuals whose understanding of modernity has led them to disenchantment with it and alienation from it. In the Islamic world, it has more general appeal in Turkey and Iran, the two countries with the most problematic experiences of modernity: Turkey because Kemalist modernity is simultaneously nationalist and in opposition to Turkey’s cultural and historical past, and Iran both because the Shah’s modernity was similarly in opposition to Iran’s culture and recent history, and because of the problematic experience of the disappointing consequences of the Islamic Revolution. In the Arab world, where experience of modernity has been much more superficial, Traditionalism is popular only in limited circles, notably among the Moroccan Franco-phone elite—which, of course, has its own problematic experience of modernity. (48)

The Soviet Union in some ways defined modernity, and Russia’s experience of that modernity was certainly problematic. Guénon condemned modernity for its loss of the sacred, its cult of the technical sciences, and its illusory cult of progress. Nowhere was the loss of the sacred more dramatic than in the officially atheist Soviet Union, and nowhere else were the two substitute cults of science and progress more assiduously advanced, and nowhere else was the cult of progress more obviously illusory. Guénon condemned the materialism that underlay modern life; in the Soviet Union, materialism was not an underlying factor that was visible only to those who looked carefully, as it was in France, but rather a major and official part of the dominant world view. In one of his most important books, The Reign of Quantity, Guénon contrasted the “modern” emphasis on quantity, with its attendant atomization, and the “traditional” emphasis on quality, understood in a metaphysical sense. (49) Quantity (in this sense, not in the sense of abundance) rather than quality was characteristic of Soviet life, again perhaps more than anywhere else.

One of Traditionalism’s major points of appeal has always been its condemnation of modernity. Traditionalism has always had limited appeal in the West, because Guénon’s characterization of modernity corresponds so little to most Westerners’ experience of modernity that it can easily seem a caricature. For those with experience of Soviet modernity, however, Traditionalism could very easily seem to present an entirely accurate analysis.

Notes:

19  “Doktor Dugin,” Literaturnaia Rossiia 15, no. 13 (April 2007), www.litrossia.ru/2007/15/ 01412.html. When I first interviewed him, Dugin identified his father simply as “an army offi- cer” (interview, Moscow, August 1999).

20  Ibid.

21  Arkady Rovner, “Gurdzhievskoe dvizhenie v Rossii 1960-kh i 1970-kh: Vospominaniia irefleksii uchastnika,” paper given at the conference on “The Occult in 20th Century Russia: Metaphysical Roots of Soviet Civilisation,” European Academy, Berlin, March 11–13, 2007.

22  Ibid.

23  Although much has been written on Gurdjieff, there is still no good scholarly history of this movement.

24  Rovner, “Gurdzhievskoe dvizhenie.”

25  Rovner, interview, Berlin, March 2007.

26  Vladislav Lebed’ko, Khroniki Rossiiskoi San’iyasy” (St. Petersburg: Tema, ND) vol. 2, ch. 3, sanyasa.narod.ru/chronicles/vol2/stepanov.htm. Accessed March 1, 2010.

27  Dugin, interview, Moscow, August 1999.

28  “Evgeniia Debrianskaia,” Proekt People’s History, www.peoples.ru/state/statesmen/evgeniia_debrianskaya/index.html, accessed March 1, 2010.

29  Dugin, interview, 1999.

30  Nine languages according to Dugin’s entry in the Russian Wikipedia (accessed March 7, 2010), and ten according to an earlier version of his biography, www.evrazia.org/modules. php?name=News&file=article&sid=1882 (accessed November 11, 2006). As well as Russian, he certainly knows French and English very well, and evidently also German, though I have not interviewed him in German.

31  Dugin, interview, 1999.

32 Ibid.

33  List of lectures at nu.evrazia.org/archives, accessed February 21, 2010.

34  Dzhemal, interview, Moscow, January 2006.

35  Rovner, “Gurdzhievskoe dvizhenie.”

36  For a recent successful application of the sociology of the sect to the analysis of the political, see Marc Sageman, Understanding Terror Networks (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004).

37  Rovner, interview.

38  He has also incorporated Herman Wirth (1885–1981) into his Traditionalism, which no Western Traditionalist has. Filosofiia traditsionalizma, 135–165. Wirth does not, however, seem to have had a major impact on Dugin’s final conceptions.

39  Dugin, “Transformatsiia politicheskikh institutov i struktur v protsesse modernizatsii tradit- sionnykh obshchestv (Unpublished dissertation: Rostov-on-Don, 2004), science.dugin.ru/ avto- disser-2.htm.

40  Deriving from Colin Campbell’s famous “The Cult, the Cultic Milieu and Secularization,” A Sociological Yearbook of Religion in Britain 5 (London: SCM Press, 1972), 119–136.

41  For example, by Michael Barkun, “Conspiracy Theories as Stigmatized Knowledge: The Basis for A New Age Racism?”, in Nation and Race: The Developing Euro-American Racist Subcul- ture, Jeffrey Kaplan, Tore Bjørgo, eds. (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1989), 62.

42  Dugin, Filosofiia traditsionalizma, 21

43  Reading list, konservatizm.org/konservatizm/sociology/060909141416.khhtml (accessed February 22, 2010).

44  This summary and subsequent summaries are drawn from the first chapters of Sedgwick, Against the Modern World.

45  Marie-Sophie André, Christophe Beaufils, Papus, biographie, la Belle époque de l’occultisme (Paris: Berg international, 1995), 171.

46  Charles B. Schmitt, “Perennial Philosophy: From Agostino Steuco to Leibniz,” Journal of the History of Ideas 27 (1966), 505–532.

47  There were some 2,000 incidents in 1977. It can be assumed that half of them were the work of Rightists.

48  These observations, like some of those following, are distilled from the relevant sections of Sedgwick, Against the Modern World.

49  René Guénon, Le règne de la quantité et les signes des temps (Paris: Gallimard, 2003).

By Mark Sedgwick

Excerpt from The New Age of Russia
Occult and Esoteric Dimensions
Part I | Part II | Part III
Pgs. 273-277

Aleksandr Dugin (b. 1962) is perhaps best known as the leading exponent in contemporary Russia of Eurasianism, an increasingly fashionable political doctrine, referred to by scholars such as Marlène Laruelle as “neo-Eurasianism.” He is also, however, one of Russia’s leading exponents of Traditionalism, a school of thought of early twentieth-century French origin which might be classed as a philosophy, but has occult roots and is usually seen by scholars as a form of esotericism. A form of Traditionalism that is both distinctively Soviet and distinctively Russian, this article will argue, lies at the heart of Dugin’s politics. This form of Traditionalism is, in important ways, a continuation into the post-Soviet era of one aspect of Soviet civilization, occult dissident culture. Dugin and his activities are generally regarded with alarm in some circles in Russia and the West, where he is regarded as a dangerous “neo-fascist.” Whether or not the Dugin phenomenon is dangerous, and if so to whom, are questions this article will not address. Neither will it address the relationship between the Dugin phenomenon and neo-fascism.

The Dugin phenomenon

Since 1967, Aleksandr Dugin has been involved in what is at first sight a bewildering array of groups and positions, starting at the margins of Russian political and intellectual life, and becoming ever more prominent. The “Dugin phenomenon,” however, becomes comprehensible if analyzed on three levels: the public, the political, and the intellectual.(1)

Dugin is at present most widely known in Russia at the public level, as a frequent commentator on foreign (and sometimes domestic) affairs in the Russian media. The fall of the Berlin wall was “a shameful event” for Russia, Dugin tells km.ru.(2) The West is using “new ways of trying to impose their vision of a unipolar world on all humanity,” he tells ITAR-TASS.(3) Protest rallies in Moldova have been organized by the U.S.A., he explains in Komsomol’skaia pravda.(4) At this public level, Dugin’s views and comments are plentiful, but not especially remarkable. They might be described as Great Russian nationalist, anti-American, or Soviet-imperial nostalgic, positions that have become increasingly common in recent years. There is much more to Dugin’s views than this, however.

At the political level, Dugin is at present the leader of the Eurasian Movement, and thus the leading spokesman for Eurasianism, a political philosophy which promotes Eurasian solidarity against the Atlantic world, and which thus fits well with currently fashionable nationalist and anti-American positions. Its declared objective is “to draw people together to work for prosperity and peace throughout the [Eurasian] continent, to build and care for our common Eurasian home.”(5)

The Eurasian Movement, established in 2001, is the successor, as Dugin’s main organizational vehicle, of the National Bolshevik Party (NBP), which he established in 1993 with the novelist Ėduard Limonov (b. 1943) and the musi- cian Egor Letov (1964–2008),(6) but left in 1998 as a result of various disappointments, and a split with Limonov (Letov was never particularly active).(7) The central political positions of the Eurasian Movement and the NBP organi- zations are quite different, as is their status. In other ways, however, they are quite similar.

The NBP was defined more by what it stood against—President Yeltsin’s Russia and the liberalism that was then popular—than by what it stood for. It was colourful, but marginal.(8) The Eurasian Movement is defined by what it stands for, and is loyal to today’s Kremlin, with which it seems to enjoy good relations.(9) It includes such establishment figures as the television journalist Mikhail Leont’ev and Mufti Talgat Taj al-Din.(10) It also differs from the NBP in having branches (some more important than others) in the West. The Eurasian Movement resembles the NBP, however, in attracting activist youth, though to the Eurasian Youth Union rather than the Eurasian Movement proper, in Russia and in the former Soviet space.(11) Members of the Eurasian Youth Union have engaged in a variety of “direct actions” outside Russia, ranging from destruction of a Ukrainian national symbol (12) to paramilitary activities on Russia’s fringes, such as Transnistria and South Ossetia.(13) The Eurasian Youth Union, then, continues the activist traditions of the old NBP, and despite differences in central political positions, the Eurasian Movement stands, as the NBP stood, against American-style liberalism.

At the intellectual level, Dugin is at present a professor of sociology at Moscow State University, where he is director of the Centre for the Study of Conservatism and editor of the Centre’s journal, Russian Time (Russkoe vremia, since 2009).(14) The Center is in a sense an organizational vehicle, but is more a forum for the promulgation of Dugin’s intellectual positions, and in this sense is the immediate successor to a lecture series called the “New University,” to individual lectures given to members of the NBP before that, and ultimately to lectures given by Dugin to members of Pamiat’ in 1987, (15) discussed below The journal is the successor of Dear Angel (Milyi Angel), Dugin’s first journal, established in 1991, and to Elements (Ėlementy), established in 1993.(16) These journals were and are supplemented by a number of major websites, well designed and with copious archives, that carry many of Dugin’s articles as well as videos of his more recent lectures.(17) The topics treated and authors referred to in all these lectures, journals, and websites have developed over the years but have not changed fundamentally, and contain significant esoteric content. The intellectual level of the Dugin phenomenon, then, shows the greatest continuity over the years.

Dugin has published 28 books between 1990 and 2010, some of which are collections of his lectures. These can be allocated to both the political and the intellectual levels, but not to the public level, as none are aimed at a mass readership. The book which first brought him to serious public attention in 1997, Geopolitical Foundations: The Geopolitical Future of Russia (Osnovy geopolitiki: geopoliticheskoe budushchee Rossii), for example, belongs to the political level, and contains little that is properly esoteric. Other books, however, belong to the intellectual level, for example The Metaphysics of the Gospel (Metafizika blagoi vesti, 1996) and The Philosophy of Traditionalism (Filosofiia traditsional- izma, 2002), and contain much that is esoteric.

The relationship between these three levels of the Dugin phenomenon might in theory be that the public creates the political, and that the political creates the intellectual. However, given that the intellectual has remained consistent over the years while the political has changed somewhat and the public has changed even more (from slight visibility at the margins to definite visibility in the mainstream), it makes more sense to understand the intellectual as giving rise to the political, and the political to the public.

This is Dugin’s own understanding of the relationship. After a period of “ultimate despair” in the 1980s, he has written, events (evidently those attending the collapse of the Soviet Union) led him to the conclusion that political and public action was necessary for the sake of the intellectual or, as he put it, that “it was necessary to strengthen the Traditionalist spirit, to clarify meta- physical positions, to consolidate the forces that could—intentionally or not— defend the sacred.”(18) The “Traditionalist spirit” (which will be explained below) and metaphysical positions relate to the intellectual level, and are where the esoteric is to be found. The consolidation of forces relates to the politicaland public levels, where the esoteric is not so central, and where others may serve Dugin’s intellectually defined objectives “intentionally or not.”

This article, therefore, understands the intellectual—including the esoteric—as the basis of the political and the public, and so will focus on the intellectual. It will now examine the origins of Dugin’s former despair, and then the Traditionalist metaphysics from which his conception of the sacred derives.

Notes:

1  My thanks to Mischa Gabowitsch for suggesting this approach to the analysis of Dugin.
2  Sergei Makarov, “Krushenie Berlinskoi steny kak tragediia Rossii,” Km.ru November 9, 2009, news.km.ru/krushenie_berlinskoj_steny_kak_t.
3  “Lider mezhdunarodnogo Evraziiskogo dvizhenia Aleksandr Dugin v Ekaterinburge,” ITAR- TASS February 11, 2010, www.tass-ural.ru/presscentre/94884.html.
4  Ol’ga Vandysheva, “Aleksandr Dugin, politolog: Kishinev podzheg Obama,” Komsomol’skaia pravda April 7, 2009, www.kp.ru/daily/24273/469785.
5  “Manifest Mezhdunarodnogo Evraziiskogo Dvizheniia,” Evrazia.org, www.evrazia.org/mod ules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1571 (accessed March 7, 2010).
6  Of Grazhdanskaia Oborona (Civil Defense).
7  The NBP under Limonov has since taken very different directions.
8  Mark Sedgwick, Against the Modern World: Traditionalism and the Secret Intellectual History of the Twentieth Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 230–232.
9  Many rumors circulate concerning these. The central point, however, is that Dugin could hardly enjoy his current public prominence without some significant support in the Kremlin.
10  “Vysshii Sovet Mezhdunarodnogo Evraziiskogo Dvizheniia,” Evraziia.info, evrazia.info/ modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1908 (accessed February 23, 2010).
11  Nataliia Ludanova argues that Eurasianism has in effect become the official Kazakh state ideology, and has close links with Dugin (Kasachische Mission: Das eurasische Konzept in der Konstruktion der nationalen Idee in Nursultan Nazarbaevs Kasachstan, unpublished thesis, University of Mainz, 2009/10). There seems, however, to be no significant esoteric content in Kazakh Eurasianism. An interesting form of Chechen Eurasianism, in contrast, does seem to have esoteric content, even though the author of an excellent recent study, Eduard ten Houten, argues against this (Blood, Power, Islam: The Life and Opinions of the Exemplary Chechen Khozh-Akhmed Noukhaev, unpublished thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2009). For my re- sponse to Ten Houten, see Mark Sedgwick, “Is Hanifi Traditionalism Traditionalist?” Tradi- tionalists, February 16, 2010, traditionalistblog.blogspot.com/2010/02/is-hanifi-traditionalism- traditionalist.html.
12  Mark Sedgwick, “Dugin Accused of Terrorism,” Traditionalists, November 7, 2007, tradition- alistblog.blogspot.com/2007/11/dugin-accused-of-terrorism.html.
13  “Associates of Dugin filed a lawsuit against Grigol Vashadze,” Expert Club, January 29, 2010, eng.expertclub.ge/portal/cnid__3311/alias__Expertclub/lang__en/tabid__2546/default.aspx.
14  Russkoe vremia 1 (August 2009), 1, haxe.d2.gfns.net/videos/pavel_ak/russkoe_vremya_Layout 1.pdf.
15  For these lectures, Dugin, interview, Moscow, August 1999.
16  For these journals, see Sedgwick, Against the Modern World, 233.
17  At present, the most important are Arktogeia (arcto.ru), Informatsionno-analiticheskii portal Evraziia (evrazia.org) and the MSU site (konservatizm.org).
18  Aleksandr Dugin, Filosofiia traditsionalizma (Moscow: Arktogeia, 2002), 547–548.

 

Part I | Part II

By Andy Sloan
July 31, 2019 Anno Domini
WW3 – the final act in a long-range synagogue script to achieve world Jewish domination

In part I, we evidenced the East’s preparation of Western military conquest in symmetry of long-range communist deception strategy or the Perestroika Deception, as revealed by Soviet defector Mr. Anatoliy Golitsyn. Now in Part II, an examination the East’s strategy for victory in recognition of the Perestroika Deception as being a component of a global script of the synagogue who control both East and West. WW3 is their final act to achieve world Jewish domination under a one world government. This is a long article, but it is highly revealing and it is necessary that we mark the complete plan in one place.

As the synagogue have declared:

“We know and secretly control all that will be.  And no one can stop us. We will have in our hands only the strings attached to the hands of the president. And we’ll pull these strings in such a way as it is necessary to the implementation of our grandiose plan of conquering all the tribes and kingdoms, their subordination to our superior nation, chosen by God of Israel.”—Rabbi Mendel Schneerson. (1)

But we must recognise the operation of the ‘god’ of the Jews, in Christ’s address to them: John 8:44  – ‘You are of your father the devil and the desires of your father you will do.’ Hence, satan is the first operative cause of the plan: Matthew 13:25 & 28; Apocalypse 12:9 – ‘But while men were asleep….an enemy hath done this….who is called the devil and Satan, who seduceth the whole world.’

THE SYNAGOGUE CONTROLS BOTH EAST AND WEST
The synagogue hold the reigns of both East and West and the Perestroika Deception is a subscript, of a long-range global plan of the synagogue, to bring about final Jewish domination of the entire earth via communism. As said Rabbi Harry Waton, 1939:

“Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth.  Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man, the emancipation of the working class and the human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that the Jews will conquer the world and the human race.” (2)

The Kahal is the political executive body of the Jewish theocratic state controlling the world. It’s existence has been identified by several sources as recorded in the book ‘The Hidden Empire’ written in 1938, which also outlines its structure. (3) In brief summary, the Kahal officials divide the world into two hemispheres, the Eastern and the Western. At the head of each hemisphere is placed a sponsor. The sponsors are reputed to be accountable only to ‘Aka’dham’, the unknown and uncrowned Prince of Jewry throughout the earth, whose identity is kept a guarded secret. The Kahal is also mentioned in the 17th Protocol of the Learned Elders of Zion. (4)

Indicatively of global Jewish control, in 1890, the Jesuits published a masterpiece, which illumined as follows:

“But the crowning achievement, which, with the help of the Masonic sects, has increased modern Jewish power a hundredfold, is the World Jewish Alliance, founded in Paris (in 1860) by Adolphe Crémieux, and then fanned out all over the world, conferring on various groups of Jews, everywhere, the vigour of the entire body of Israel. Its founder was therefore correct in describing it as ‘the most beautiful and fertile institution that has ever been created in modern times and an instrument of domination so powerful that it governs the world.” (5)

Control is exercised through compartmentalised layers of secrecy, so the ultimate conspiracy and its progenitors is largely cloaked. I  provide some indicative proof of this control.

In the USA: Harold Rosenthal, a Jew and administrative assistant to Senator Jacob Javits said in an interview with Walter White in 1976, that ‘no one in the last three decades has achieved any political power without Jewish approval. Americans have not had a presidential choice since 1932 when (the Jew) Franklin Roosevelt was our man; every president since Roosevelt has been our man.’ (6) 

Admiral Thomas Moorer, Head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff 1983: ‘I’ve never seen a president – I don’t care who he is – stand up to them (the Israelis). It just boggles your mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what’s going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn’t writing anything down. If the American people understood what grip those people have on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens don’t have any idea what goes on.’

In the United Kingdom: Admiral Sir Barry Domvile (d. 1971 RIP), former director of intelligence services of the British navy in his memoirs ‘From Admiral to Cabin Boy’: “From that time onwards, I had a strong suspicion that there was some mysterious power at work behind the scenes controlling the actions of the figures visibly taking part in the Government of the country. I had not the least idea whence this power emanated, nor could I gauge the strength of its influence. I was in far too humble a position to make such lofty discoveries. Still the feeling persisted. We always vaguely referred to this hidden control amongst ourselves as ‘the Treasury’. This mysterious power I christened ‘Judmas’, because, as I discovered at a much later date, its source is the Judeo-Masonic combination, which has wielded such a baneful influence in world history for many centuries.’ (8)

In France: Jewish journalist Rene Groos, ‘The New Mercury’ June, 1922: “There is a Jewish conspiracy against all Nations, but first of all against France, and the principle of order which she represents in the world. This conspiracy occupies almost everywhere the avenues of power; in France it is at present the actual reigning power.  The Universal Jewish Conspiracy …. (this double assault of Jewish Revolution and Jewish Finance) … must be disrupted or France will perish as did Russia.” (9)

In the Soviet Union: Harold Rosenthal also revealed the following to Walter White in 1976:

WW: ‘To your knowledge, are the Jews in Russia really persecuted or are they given any kind of freedom? To which he said: HR: ‘Most Jews throughout the world—I’d say more than 90% know what is really happening to our people. We have communication unequalled anywhere. To answer your question—in Russia, there are two distinct governments—one visible and the other invisible. The visible is made up of different nationalities—whereas the invisible is composed of all Jews. The powerful Soviet secret police (KGB) takes its orders from the invisible government. There are about six to seven million Communists in Soviet Russia. 50% are Jews and about 50% gentile—but the gentiles are not trusted. The Communist Jews are united and trust each other—while the others spy on one another. About every five or six years the secret Jewish Board calls for the purge of the Party and many are liquidated.’

When asked, why? He said: “Because they begin to understand too much of the Jewish secret government. Russian Communists have a Secret Group Order which consists of Jews only.They rule over everything pertaining to the visible government. It was this powerful organization that was responsible for the secret removal of the centre of Communism to Tel Aviv from where all instructions now originate.” (10)

This harmonises with the observations of Mr Golitsyn, “The elite are the ultimate authority in Russia: it provides the collective leadership of which the President is a member and which decides, among other things, how long he should serve as President. The elite has to have some mechanism at its disposal through which such decisions can be reached and through which controlled political events can be coordinated. It is essential to the success of the strategy that this mechanism should be well concealed from the West. I lack the facilities to study how it might be operating.” (11)

In China: Mao Zedong was installed through the Skull and Bones Secret Society operating out of Yale University. In 1903, Yale Divinity School established a number of schools and hospitals throughout China that were collectively known as ‘Yale in China’. Mao was hired as the editor of the Yale-in-China journal and subsequently, he set up a ‘culture bookstore’ in 1920, the buildings of which belonged to the Yale group. In 2012, writing in the Jewish magazine ‘Forward’, Laura Goldman wrote ’85 to 90% of the foreigners helping the Chinese at the time of the Communist takeover were Jewish. This included the daughter of the founder of the brokerage firm Goldman Sachs, who left the comfort of her Park Avenue home to assist the Chinese.’ (12)

And Mr Louis Marschalko in his 1958 book ‘The World Conquerors’ comprehensively lists the corps of Jews operating in key positions within the Soviet and US governments during WW2 and thereafter. (13)

In the subtle wisdom of Sacred Scripture, this modus operandi of the synagogue of operating behind a gentile front and as a blinding power of truth and morality, is denoted in the person of the Jew Elymas who St Paul met in accompaniment of a proconsul (a high official of the Roman state): Acts 13:6-12, “And when they had gone through the whole island, as far as Paphos, they found a certain man, a magician (kabbalah), a false prophet, a Jew, whose name was Bar-jesu: Who was with the proconsul Sergius Paulus, a prudent man. He sending for Barnabas and Saul, desired to hear the word of God. But Elymas the magician (for so his name is interpreted) withstood them, seeking to turn away the proconsul from the faith. Then Saul, otherwise Paul, filled with the Holy Ghost, looking upon him, Said: O full of all guile, and of all deceit, child of the devil, enemy of all justice, thou ceasest not to pervert the right ways of the Lord…. And now behold, the hand of the Lord is upon thee, and thou shalt be blind, not seeing the sun for a time. And immediately there fell a mist and darkness upon him, and going about, he sought some one to lead him by the hand. Then the proconsul, when he had seen what was done, believed, admiring at the doctrine of the Lord.”

This mode of operation is described in protocol 10 of the Protocols of Zion, in reference to their arranging for the election of Presidents who are ‘a puppet in our hands.’ (14) We also have confessed penetration of Christian society by crypto-Jews.

Hayim Bialik – the Israeli ‘National Poet’ and Zionist, stated in a speech given at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, May 11, 1933.

“Judaism, which was destroyed politically (following the destruction of the Temple in 70 AD), went to the big world and adapted its goods to its wanderings as an army going to war, a ‘moveable state’.” The Jews were forced to smuggle their goods from border to border, so they chose abstract goods, easy to stubble, which allowed them, despite the ghettos and restrictions, to penetrate everywhere. Such penetration was not without the deliberate connivance of the Jews in the form of assistance provided in a thousand ways, means and disguises. It has been affected in great measure by crypto-Jews, who permeated Christianity and spoke through the mouth of Christianity.

By these means, by the Jewish will and by the power of their Jewish blood and by instinct of ‘reprisal’, it is they who, in principle, are the creators of the Renaissance (reason displaces faith in Christ), liberalism, democracy, socialism and communism. All this was done mainly by unknown anonymous Jews, secret Jews, crypto-Jews who mingled with the Gentiles and fed great thinkers or by the influence of the Jews who, in the great crises of freedom, stood behind the scenes or through Jewish teachers and scholars of the Middle Ages. They were disciples of Jewish teachers who led Protestant movements.’

As for Freemasonry, it is the servile gentile subsidiary of the synagogue, as documented in the Protocols of Zion (4 &15) and also in the aforementioned Jesuit work (Part II, section VIII  ‘Whence Freemasonry?’) Indeed a Bro. James Anderson of the Grand Lodge of England, published in the masonic Constitutions of 1738: “A Mason is obliged by his Tenure to observe the Moral Law, as a true Noachida.”

They labour in plan of the eradication of the entire Christian order which they consider an enemy of human freedom and a ‘New Order of the Ages’ (as embossed on the US $1 bill) as manifesting human will in subversion of the will of God. Liberalism, socialism, communism as invented by the synagogue are their tools. But they are deceived in that they are gentile instruments to world domination of the synagogue and they are building their own prisons. As it says in Protocols 4:

“Gentile masonry blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan of action of our force, even its very abiding-place, remains for the whole people an unknown mystery.”

WORLD WARS 1 & 2 WERE PLANNED AND EXECUTED BY THE SYNAGOGUE

It was in coordination of the synagogue nexus in West and East or as Admiral Barry Domville said above the ‘mysterious power at work behind the scenes controlling the actions of the figures visibly taking part in the Government of the country’, that manufactured WW2. At the World Jewish Congress in NYC, the then President of the organisation Dr. Chaim Weizmann, stated on the 3rd December 1942:

“We are not denying and are not afraid to confess that this war is our war and that it is waged for the liberation of Jewry. Stronger than all fronts together is our front, that of Jewry. We are not only giving this war our financial support on which the entire war production is based, we are not only providing our full propaganda power which is the moral energy that keeps this war going.” (15)

WW1 had been predicted and to its intended effect by Max Nordua, who was co-founder of the World Zionist Organization together with Theodor Herzl. As documented by Litman Rosenthal in ‘The American Jewish News’ September 19, 1919, Nordua said in a speech in 1903: “Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, The Zionist Congress, the English Uganda proposition, the future world war, the peace conference where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine will be created. (16)

As Jew converted to Catholicism Mr Benjamin Freedman testifies, the synagogue managed as a result of WW1 to obtain the Balfour Declaration, in bribe of bringing the US under President Woodrow Wilson into the war, to bring victory to the Allies. (17) However, they did not attain a sovereign Israeli State. But, in plan of turning the world communist, the synagogue were successful in using the cover of WW1 to manufacture the revolution in Russia in 1917, which as now well documented was fomented by Jews. (18)

To finally obtain a sovereign Israeli state, WW2 was planned with the hoax of the holocaust a centrepiece narrative (19), in order to generate the emotional political support for its establishment, in heist of the territory from the Palestinians. Communism was to be expanded to Eastern Europe.

In script, the Jewish puppet Hitler (20) was established and the narrative of the horror of Nazi territorial expansion plan of  Generalplan Ost was invented as a decoy for the Eastern European land-mass that was to be ‘liberated’ from the Nazis by the Soviet Union, before communism was imposed them. (21) (Perhaps to give revelation of the hitherto secret Generalplan Ost was the reason Rudolph Hess flew to Britain in ‘confession’, so it could be used in justification of the ‘liberation’ strategy?)

In all, the synagogue were overwhelmingly successful. As Mr Douglas Reed said in his book The Controversy of Zion: “It was only these three movements – Communism, Zionism, and World Government, that profited from the suffering and destruction of the Second World War. The Western Powers helped the World Revolution to entrench itself deep in Europe. General Eisenhower ordered the Western generals to stop at a line Vienna-Berlin. All of the Eastern European countries, the ‘liberation’ of which had supposedly been what the whole war was all about, were sacrificed to the revolutionary terror at the Yalta-conference.” (22)

Another key objective was to subdue to German nation, so it could never rise as in opposition to Jewish power. As Valadimir Jabotinsky, founder in Israel of the Zionist terrorist group Irgun Zvai Leumi stated in January, 1934:
“Germany is striving to become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany.”

The final aim was the destruction of Eastern Christianity – the well-spring of civilisation.

Since the end of WW2, fundamental geopolitics has been preparatory for a final WW3, designed to give the synagogue complete world domination. The Perestroika Deception is the key element in achieving this. Soviet analyst Christopher Story (RIP) records  that the West and the Soviet Union agreed in 1948 that Eastern Germany was to be occupied for 40 years. (I cannot obtain the source for this info, but we will take it is accurate in borrow of his expertise.) (23) Deductively, the fundamental reason for the 40 year period was that communism could cross-generationally embed itself into the deepest fibres of the Eastern bloc and China, with control structures matured and expertise on how to manage iron despotism over a vast area acquired. With East and West in enmity, the hideous weapons necessary for the final cataclysm of WW3 were justified in production and the lines of combat defined.

Mr Story states that the then US Secretary of State James Burns was the prime agent of this agreement on behalf of the West. We note that Mr Burns was an associate of super-Jew Bernard Baruch and also a member of the super-elite freemasonic organisation the Society of Cincinnati. (24) Bernard Baruch took control over the atomic bomb and its secret of production away from American nation and the Army, through an Act signed by President’s Truman which established the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. The synagogue gained effective control of the nuclear technology and its dispersal throughout the world. (25)

During the period between WW2 and the Perestroika Deception, more testimony to prove that the synagogue continued to control both East and West; Dr. Lawrence Dunegan regarding a lecture he attended in 1969 at a meeting of the Pittsburgh Paediatric Society. The lecturer was Dr Richard Day who was described as an ‘insider’ of the New World Order: “Most people don’t understand how governments operate and even people in high positions in governments, including our own, don’t really understand how and where decisions are made. He indicated that there is much more cooperation between East and West than most people realise.” (26)

“In the mid-seventies when the SALT II (Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty) was being discussed by the U.S. Senate, the author of this article (Charlotte Iserbyt) arranged for a Soviet defector by the name of Igor Glagolev to come to Maine to participate in a debate with Secretary of Defense Paul Warnke. This debate was arranged by Maine’s Chamber of Commerce. Glagolev did a superb job presenting reasons why the United States should not sign onto this Treaty. At dinner the same evening Glagolev informed me that prior to his defection, when he held a very high position in the Kremlin, he sat in on meetings at which David Rockefeller Sr. and Henry Kissinger were often present.” (27)

PERESTROIKA DECEPTION ENACTED
“I don’t agree that the Cold War is back. It never ended.” – Andrei Lugovoi, Deputy of the Russian state Duma in 2000.

“Who told you that the Cold War was ever over? It transforms, it is like a virus.”  – Sergei Tretyakov, KGB/FSB defector (in 2000) on FOX News in 2009.

The Berlin wall came down in 1989 following the aforementioned 40 years period and communism apparently dissolved in ruse of the Perestroika Deception. Mr Golitsyn, who defected in 1961, describes the objectives and operation of the deception: “The Cold War may be ‘over’ for the West. For the Soviets it has entered a new, active and promising phase. Perestroika is the result of 30 years of preparation and strategy in the restructuring of the whole world. In consequence, the communist strategists are now poised to enter into the final, offensive phase of the long-range policy, entailing a joint struggle for the complete triumph of communism. The essence of the special manoeuvre in the present grand strategy for Communism lies, internally, in the creation and use of controlled ‘political opposition’ to effect a transition to new ‘democratic’, ‘non-Communist’, ‘nationalist’ power structures which remain in reality Communist-controlled. Internationally, the essence of the manoeuvre lies in the use of the political potential of these new power structures to develop contacts and promote solidarity with the Western democracies as a means towards the achievement of world Communist victory through the convergence of the Communist and non-Communist systems.” (28) It incorporated a fake Sino-Soviet split (scissors strategy).

“Its overall objective can be defined briefly as the exploitation of the scissors strategy to hasten the achievement of long-range communist goals. Duality in Sino-Soviet polemics is used to mask the nature of the goals and the degree of coordination in the communist effort to achieve them. The feigned disunity of the communist world promotes real disunity in the non-communist world. Each blade of the communist pair of scissors makes the other more effective. The militancy of one nation helps the activist detente diplomacy of the other. Mutual charges of hegemonism help to create the right climate for one or the other to negotiate agreements with the West. False alignments, formed with third parties by each side against the other, make it easier to achieve specific communist goals, such as the acquisition of advanced technology or the negotiation of arms control agreements or communist penetration of the Arab and African states. In Western eyes the military, political,economic, and ideological threat from world communism appears diminished. In consequence Western determination to resist the advance of communism is undermined. At a later stage the communist strategists are left with the option of terminating the split and adopting the strategy of one clenched fist.” (29)

We can adduce that German unification became the door for communism to infect and control Western Europe towards the convergence with the East, with Germany’s prime control of the EU. This process has greatly accelerated since 2005 with Angela Merkel, a Soviet agent, as Chancellor of Germany. (30)

Yet, employing common-sense analysis, the success of the Perestroika Deception can only have been possible because the synagogue in the West have confounded military/intelligence structures and the media to its operation. Mr Golitsyn’s painstakingly documented revelations and his predictions of which 94% came true, have never gained any substantive traction in the West. When first unveiled, his revelations were denounced wholesale within (Jewish controlled) academia and media. He wrote himself ‘I was appalled that ‘perestroika’ was embraced and supported by the United States without any serious debate on the subject.’  And the deception was also affirmed by subsequent defectors such as Jan Sejna, Vladimir Rezun and Col. Stanislav Lunev.
Mr Golitysn’s US interface was Head of CIA counter-intelligence James Angleton, who apparently entertained the Perestroika Deception. Mr Golitysn even praised Angleton in his book of the same name. (31) But it is likely that Mr Golitysn was deceived as to Angleton’s sincerity. Indeed, the late Jewish conspiracy analyst Michael Collins Piper provides evidence that Angleton was a Zionist and pivotal in the cover-up of JFK assassination. (32) Also a monument was erected to Angleton’s honour in Jerusalem, after his death in 1987. (33) And in his memoir Meir Amit, Mossad chief in the 1960’s, said of Angleton ‘He was an extraordinary asset for us. He was the biggest Zionist of them all.’  The Jewish fingerprint is there.

And when President Nixon’s administration embarked on their Chinese ‘detente’ policy in 1972 in apparent enticement of the fake Sino-Soviet split, his national security advisor was none other than Henry Kissinger.

The US engagement with China advanced to ‘most favoured nation’ trading status (MFN) in 1980. This led to a massive commercial and military build-up in the country and the transfer from the US and the West of the global manufacturing base. Indeed all of the former Soviet states, including Russia, were granted MFN status in 1996.

According to the script of the Perestroika Deception, this was a successful dupe of the West. But in fact it was cooperated with by the Western synagogue operating through government, to raise up China in the same manner as the synagogue supported the Bolsheviks in 1917, raised Hitler and supported the Soviet Union as revealed by Professor Anthony Sutton. (34) Or are we to believe that other than by conspiracy, the US would convert a communist China into a military superpower in threat to itself?

Now with China and Russia allied again,  we confront the Eastern ‘one-clenched fist’, as outlined in Part I. But, we must recognise that the Perestroika Deception was the Eastern narrative according to a globally orchestrated plan by the synagogue.

Hence, we see gratuitous cooperation of the West with the East by successive US Presidents with the Perestroika Deception and even before. Indicative: Mr Norman Dodd, a Yale Graduate and former investment banker was chosen to be the research director for the Reece Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives in 1953 to investigate the status of tax-exempt foundations. President Rowan Gaither of the Ford Foundation told him, “Mr. Dodd, all of us here at the policy making level of the foundation have at one time or another served in the OSS (Office of Strategic Services, CIA forerunner) or the European Economic Administration, operating under directives from the White House. We operate under those same directives…. The substance under which we operate is that we shall use our grant making power to so alter life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.” (35)

Charlotte Iserbyt – Senior Policy Advisor Education Department under President Reagan.

‘Presidents Reagan and Gorbachev signed education agreements in 1985 at the same time the Carnegie Corporation of New York signed even more extensive agreements with the Soviet Academy of Science. These agreements accelerated the merger of the two education systems, changing our education system from one focused on academics and individual upward mobility to one focused on quotas for certain jobs requiring work force training (performance/outcomes- based) for a planned international socialist economy.’ (36)

Journalist A. M. Rosenthal (Jew), in The New York Times, January 1991.

“But it became clear as time went on that in Mr (GHW) Bush’s mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council.” (37)

Also policy to ensure purposeful Western defeat in WW3.

President Bill Clinton. “In 1997, President Bill Clinton issued Presidential decision directive (PDD) 60.  This directive radically changed US strategic nuclear policy from ‘launch on warning’ to ‘retaliate after absorbing a first strike’.
President Clinton’s justification for this change was based on the false premise that in the so-called Post-Cold War Era’, Russia and China are no longer nuclear threats.” (38)

And we should note this of Clinton as published in the US ‘Spotlight’ magazine. ‘Rabbi Cohen is recorded as saying. . . . Fortunately for us at this time, we have ensconced in the White House the greatest friend that the ‘Jews’ have ever had. President Bill Clinton has been of great benefit to us Jews. . . When the goyim of the United States discover his treason, they will probably dig up his corpse and chop it into pieces anyway. Except for Woodrow Wilson (Federal Reserve Act 1913 & sending the US into WW1 in exchange for the Britain signing the Balfour declaration to give Israel to the Zionists), no other US President has helped the Jews more than Bill Clinton.’

(Transcripts from tape labeled Yesivah Lecture #5 by Rabbi Cohen and translated from his Yiddish lecture tapes by David Goldstein.)

Regarding Obama, a retired Army Major General Paul Valley said: “The White House protects their own. That’s why they stalled on the investigation into ‘Fast and Furious’, Benghazi and Obamacare. He’s (Obama) intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.”

And retired Major General Patrick Brady: “There is no doubt he (Obama) is intent on emasculating the military and will fire anyone who disagrees with him.” (39)

George Bush Jr of course oversaw the false flag of 9/11, and provided the opportunity to bring under firm synagogue control countries such as Libya and Iraq in the name of  ‘freedom’, which were not primed for world Jewish government. Hence Otto Kahn – Jewish Banker Kuhn-Loeb:

“We (Jews) are a League of Nations which contains the elements of all others. It is the fact which qualifies us to unite the nations around us. We are accused of being the agent which dissolves them. It is only at points which are impervious to that synthesis of national elements, of which ours is both the example and the means that we act as dissolvent.” (40)

Hence, the Perestroika Deception is an operation of an Eastern script, which has been corresponded to in implementation of a Western script, with both being the components of a compartmentalised global master-script devised by the synagogue.

WW3 SCRIPT
As Lenin stated his ‘collected works’: “The World War (1914-1918) will see the establishment of Communism in Russia; a second world war will extend its control over Europe and a third world war will be necessary to make it worldwide.”

Since the fall of the Berlin wall, the synagogue have operated two distinct, phased narratives. For a decade after the ‘collapse’ of communism, we heard from both East and West declarations regarding a ‘New World Order’, which would apparently be a world government based on the mutual agreement of nations. This narrative provided rapidly for the development of the global convergence of ‘communist and non-communist systems’ as described by Mr Golitsyn above.

However, since the presidency of Putin in 1999, the narrative changed markedly. The East have been progressively presented as virtuous global citizens with Putin as the figurehead – apparently a virtuous ‘christian’ (but his Christianity is proven to be fake – he and Medevedev are crypto-Jews) (41) The West in contrast has been imaged as imperialistic, despotic and immoral.

And we should mark here to further unmask Putin, the circumstances of the transition of the Russian presidency in 1999. On 31 December 1999, Yeltsin unexpectedly resigned and, according to the Constitution of Russia, Putin became Acting President of the Russian Federation.

The first Presidential Decree that Putin signed, on 31 December 1999, was titled ‘On guarantees for former president of the Russian Federation and members of his family.’ This ensured that “corruption charges against the outgoing President and his relatives” would not be pursued. This was most notably targeted at the Mabetex bribery case in which Yeltsin’s family members were involved. On 30 August 2000, a criminal investigation was dropped in which Putin himself was one of the suspects as a member of the Saint Petersburg city government. On 30 December 2000, yet another case against the prosecutor general was dropped for ‘lack of evidence’, in spite of thousands of documents passed by Swiss prosecution. On 12 February 2001, Putin signed a similar federal law which replaced the decree of 1999. A case regarding Putin’s alleged corruption in metal exports from 1992 was brought back by Marina Salye, but she was silenced and forced to leave Saint Petersburg.’ (42)

Fundamental to the change of narrative was to sully Western character. The majority of peoples in Western nations self-identify with liberty, morality and nationalism – the West is the ‘free-world’. Hence, to gain and maintain consent to world government from Westerners is a difficult task. Therefore, whilst maintaining hidden communist control of the East through the Perestroika Deception, from the outset of Putin’s presidency the synagogue enacted a script exalting the East in perception of virtue whilst converting the West into the image of a ‘new Soviet Union’ and a military aggressor. This strategy is summed up by Putin confidante Alexander Dugin in his article ‘Principles and strategy of coming war’: “It is obvious that you can only wage war effectively with an external enemy if the society is quite consolidated and mobilized internally. It is desirable to be mentally prepared for the war. To do this, people must understand who is the enemy and who is not, and, most importantly, why this is the case and not so otherwise.
You mustn’t demonize the enemy at the very beginning of the war. The image of the enemy must be formed in advance and deliberately…. Therefore, the first task to gain victory would be real fully-fledged company to create the entirely negative, monstrous, satanic image of the United States and the West in general. Therefore, the West is a place where the devil resides. It is the centre of the global capitalist tentacles. It is the matrix of ​​rotting cultural perversion and a vice grip of falsehood and cynicism, violence and hypocrisy. Russia already does this…”

Dugin identifies the enemy to be defeated as the ‘manic satanic elite/globalists’ who control the West to the detriment of the citizenry. This would be the Western equivalent of the ‘demised’ Soviet politburo:
“Russia should be actively involved in the struggle for influence on the American society, strengthening the explanation of the Russian spiritual position in the war, showing that Russians and Americans have a common enemy: a manic satanic elite that have usurped power and are leading the whole of humanity, including the Americans, towards the inevitable catastrophe. The elite’s results are evident: the whole Middle East is already covered in blood, they are not able any more to establish any order, the globalist elite (the CFR, the neocons, the representatives of the international financial oligarchy of Wall Street) implants everywhere only chaos, devastation, death and pain. The destruction of such a cancer on humanity is a matter for the entire world, including the Americans, who are not only its instruments but also victims.” (43)

And specifically regarding Europe, Dugin says elsewhere: “Russia must save Europe from the liberal elite that destroys it.” (44)

Dugin, it should be noted was the co-founder of the National Bolshevik Party in Russia in 1996. He has been condemned by the Russian Orthodox Church as a ‘disciple of the satanist Aleister Crowley, so we must not be deceived by his apparent virtue. Here he is at a Bolshevik party meeting in 1996.In example of the synagogue operating this script in the West, General Wesley Clark’s public testimony in 2006 that the US ‘neocons’ were going to attack 7 Middle-Eastern/African countries in 5 years is well known. (45) In 2007, he also spoke against ‘New York money people’ pushing for war with Iran. Clark, who is a Jew (his father’s surname was Kanne), also said in 1999 regarding the Kosovo War ‘There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th-century idea and we are trying to transition it into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states’. (46) Clark is a Western agent of the script and also Rabbi Schneerson’s plan of ‘secret active work on the structuring of the population according to the system necessary to us.’  (47) in prime target of the white race, who the synagogue consider as the biggest threat to their dominion.

The script is being peddled to culmination in a WW3 of ‘liberation’ of a ‘Sovietised’ West by the East. As with the ‘liberation’ from Nazism in WW2 by the Soviet Union, the synagogue are giving us another liberation script in mask of imposing despotic control, this time on the entire West. Hence, given in mask of the Perestroika Deception, communism was never dissolved, this will in eventual synthesis give the synagogue control of the entire world. In fact communism was not only not dissolved, but in hidden form it has been strategically extended in influence through Russian and Chinese multi-locking alliances such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, the BRICS nations (linking to the Union of S. American nations), the China-South Asia Cooperation Forum, the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation and the Chinese New Belt Road initiatives. In influence in Central American, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Panama and the Dominican Republic even officially recognise Taiwan as part of China. Hence the West is virtually surrounded and all this to plan. As Stalin said in 1939: “The withering away of the state, the precondition for the classless society, could not be entertained as a possibility until the encirclement of socialism by capitalism had been changed to the encirclement of capitalism by socialism. That is to say, until those conditions had been established which would assure world-wide Soviet domination.”

In his books, Mr Golitsyn does not specify a WW3, but a strategy of  nuclear blackmail by the East that will force the West to accept a communist federation. But we must surmise this was because in compartmentalisation of the strategy, at his operational level the plan of WW3 was kept secret. This because in cooperation of the Perestroika Deception even some hardened communist operators might baulk at the death and destruction that could be envisaged.

However Soviet military defector Major General Jan Sejna who defected in 1968 reveals WW3 and the ‘West to be blamed’ narrative have been long planned:

“Portions of the Soviet plans for seizing control of the United States following a nuclear strike were described by the head of the Administration for Special Propaganda to Sejna just prior to Sejna’s defection. The description provides an interesting insight into the possible nature of Soviet plans and, in a certain regard, their efforts to clothe mechanisms in indigenous or nationalistic trappings (ie. as Dugin portrays, that the West must be ‘saved’ by the East from the ‘manic satanic elite’). In 1967 the Soviets believed that, in addition to strikes against nuclear and critical military targets, roughly 110 nuclear strikes would be adequate to cripple the United States. In the attack, Europe would not be destroyed. Rather, Moscow would launch a propaganda campaign to tell the Europeans that the Soviets had saved their lives. The United States would be blamed for starting the war and an international committee for the neutrality of the United States would be formed. Pressure would be produced from the left and from Europe and elsewhere for the United States to give up.”

Also former GRU Colonel Stanislav Lunev who defected from Russia in 1992 (ie. after the Perestroika Deception) stated that the Russian Generals were still committed to fighting and winning a future nuclear war against America. ‘The nuclear war plan is still on. But there would be changes.

No longer would Russian troops be responsible for a follow-up invasion of the lower 48 states (U.S. mainland). Russian forces would be responsible for occupying ‘Alaska and parts of Canada. The Chinese would occupy the lower 48 states.  In addition, certain Third World countries would be given ‘looting rights’ (hence the open border policy)’ (48)

And again the aforementioned Petr Cibulka in 2005: “I am convinced that Russian military intelligence (GRU) is directing terrorist activities against the United States and the West. This is Moscow’s main option for defeating the West. Therefore the GRU is supplying the Islamic terrorists with Russian nuclear weapons so the planned attack against the United States by Russia, China and their allies can follow.” (49)

Soviet analyst J R Nyquist describes expertly in reference (50), how Russia special forces will be used in cover of Arab ‘terrorists’ to weaken and disorientate the West just prior to the main attack.

In 2011, Kissinger telegraphed the ‘US/Western aggressor’ narrative when he said of China ‘they will use military force if feel themselves threatened.’ And in brush of an innocent image in future cause of WW3, he continues ‘it’s hard for me to visualise a Chinese military strategy designed to back up a world government.’ (51)

In all, the narrative was summed up by Dmitri Medvedev in 2007 -‘we must be prepared to extend our influence and save the world.’ (52)

PRE-WAR STRATEGY
Prior to the WW3, there are three key actions designed by the synagogue to weaken and Sovietize the West.

1) A split of the USA and Europe and the dissolution of NATO/establishment of a European military. Alexander Dugin’s  speech in China in 2018: “We could describe some features of this multipolarity. First of all, the West should be split. The United States of America  are one pole of civilization, and there’s Europe that is not the same. They have a lot in common, but there are a lot of things that divide USA and Europe, more and more.Now it’s time to give a form to these differences.” (53)

Again, Petr Cibulka: “Our paper debunked many lies widely believed about the November revolution of 1989 and the fact it was not an anti-communist revolution at all. It was a privatization coup organized by the reform wing of the Russian KGB. It was accomplished in order to install the self-invited ‘new administration’ turning them into the country’s rulers and lawful owners. And that was achieved in full measure by the communists, the STB and KGB structures under the leadership of Vaclav Havel. As a result there was a fraudulent privatization of state wealth that in fact ended up in the hands of communist and STB/KGB structures only.”

“Vaclav Havel told them (the US Congress) then: ‘If you want to help Czechoslovakia then you must help the Soviet Union!’ He was also saying at the time: ‘The liquidation of the Warsaw Pact should be followed by the liquidation of NATO!”

“They’re (the Soviets) realizing that Western Europe is already under their rule indirectly through communist agents of influence – corrupt and compromised politicians. Western Europe is not a threat to Moscow. Therefore to the communists America is still the #1 enemy and an obstacle on their way to conquer the World. As I have stated before, Russia is determined to fight America through surrogates. On the one hand, Russia is trying to provoke a split between America and Europe. On the other hand, Russia is trying to strengthen the most fanatical anti-American regimes in the world by supplying them with weapons of mass destruction.” (54)

And in Western cooperation, the verified synagogue puppet and freemason Emmanuel Macron: “We have to protect ourselves with respect to China, Russia and even the United States of America.” (55)

The split will clearly weaken Western military force and although WW3 will be secretly directed by the synagogue in same manner as admitted by Chaim Weizmann above of WW2, it will demoralise the Western military who will be fighting unaware they are performing to a synagogue script. The split is in process:

2) Civil disturbances/war/revolution.

The tinder for this will be a deliberate economic collapse in method of the Protocols of Zion: “This hatred will be still further magnified by the effects of an economic crisis, which will stop dealings on the exchanges and bring industry to a standstill. We shall create by all the secret subterranean methods open to us and with the aid of gold, which is all in our hands, a universal economic crisis whereby we shall throw upon the streets whole mobs of workers simultaneously in all the countries of Europe. These mobs will rush delightedly to shed the blood of those whom, in the simplicity of their ignorance, they have envied from their cradles, and whose property they will then be able to loot.   Ours they will not touch, because the moment of attack will be known to us and we shall take measures to protect our own.” (56)

This is the reason why world debt has been exploded by the synagogue to three times global GDP of $88 trillion (57).
And the notional value of outstanding (over-the-counter) derivatives contracts is $544 trillion. (58) The latter has been set as the gunpowder for financial collapse. As Warren Buffett recognised: “The derivatives genie is now well out of the bottle, and these instruments will almost certainly multiply in variety and number until some event makes their toxicity clear. Central banks and governments have so far found no effective way to control, or even monitor, the risks posed by these contracts. In my view,derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction, carrying dangers that, while now latent, are potentially lethal…. The problem arises when there is a discontinuity in the market for some reason or another. When the markets closed like it was for a few days after 9/11 or in World War I the market was closed for four or five months – anything that disrupts the continuity of the market when you have trillions of dollars of nominal amounts outstanding and no ability to settle up and who knows what happens when the market reopens.”

Russia and China on the other hand are insulated by their quietly accumulated masses of gold which, in collapse of the financial system and the US$, they can in pre-plan launch a new currency to displace the dollar and bleed capital from West to East. (59)

Remembering this is a long-range plan, the flames of civil disturbance have been deliberately planted in the West with the pelting of society with vice, most significantly pornography, violence and murder. The youth have been especially targeted for corruption.

In Fyador Dostoevsky’s book ‘Demons’, the method to produce revolutionaries is described by the nihilist Verkhovesnky, in plot to overthrow the government and impose socialism via violent insurrection: “One or two generations of vice are absolutely essential now. Monstrous, disgusting vice which turns man into an abject, cowardly, cruel and selfish wretch – that’s what we want.” (60)

Hence Willi Munzenberg summed up the morally subversive (predominantly Jewish) Frankfurt School’s long-term operation – “We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.” (61)

This methodology was marked two centuries ago by Pope Pius VIII in his encyclical ‘Traditi Humiltati’ of 1829:

“We want you to know of another secret society organized not so long ago for the corruption of young people who are taught in the gymnasia and the lycea. Its cunning purpose is to engage evil teachers to lead the students along the paths of Baal (demon of impurity) by teaching them un-Christian doctrines. The perpetrators know well that the students’ minds and morals are moulded by the precepts of the teachers.Its influence is already so persuasive that all fear of religion has been lost, all discipline of morals has been abandoned, the sanctity of pure doctrine has been contested and the rights of the sacred and of the civil powers have been trampled upon.” (62)

In his book, Mr Dostoevsky also speaks of how government repression of public dissent, would contribute to the revolutionary fervour. The nihilists expected a revolt and awaited the time where the people would rise to the occasion and give the power structure a reason to repress them.  It all began with the silencing of the people. Their free speech and their freedom of the press were taken from them. Eventually there is an uprising of murderous anger, a volcanic eruption of nihilistic violence that consumes the provincial capital in a great fire. In the end, Governor Lembke stands amid the crowd watching his mansion go up in flames. A fireman seeks to douse the fire and a policeman tells the governor, that he is putting the fire out. The governor states in allegory of the uprising:
“Not likely. The fire is in the minds of men and not in the roofs of houses.” (63)

To be sure, the ‘yellow vests’ in France have been constituted as a vanguard for future revolution.

In his 2nd inauguration address in 2005, George Bush Jr reveals the plan of revolution in reference to Mr Dostoevsky’s book: “By our efforts we have lit a fire as well, a fire in the minds of men.”

In context of the Founding Fathers of the US, he also makes reference to a ‘New Order of the Ages’, but the freemasonic ‘New Order’ is not the one embodied in the liberties in the US constitution. And in his 1st inauguration address in 2001, Bush said ‘an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm’. In speaking of the directing ‘angel’, he makes a hidden reference to satan in displacement of God, for as it is written in Nahum 1:3 – “The Lord’s ways are in a tempest and a whirlwind.” (64)

Thus in purposely creating riot and revolution, then government repression under martial law can be enacted as anticipated for example by the communist blueprint of Obama’s National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order of 2012 (65) or in the UK, the Civil Contingencies bill. (66) Over 800 FEMA camps are documented to have been constructed in the US to receive dissenters. (67)

And Petr Cibulka testifies how the Russians are active in promoting civil collapse in synthesis of the global synagogue plan:

“At this time Russia is not trying to defeat the West by herself in a direct confrontation; but she is using anybody willing to help to destabilize and cause the total breakdown of the West. This method involves subversion from within and also from without, against Western countries. It is the breakdown of Western Civilization by removing its spiritual and moral pillars and replacing them with materialism and socialism. Also its economic, political and power structures, and it is necessary to fundamentally weaken the middle class and limit the bourgeoisie’s political role. This strategy has apparently met with success.” (68)

Immigrants, in particular muslims, have been progressively brought into Western countries as a powerful incendiary to civil war, in clash with ethnic populations.

3) Finally, Western identity to be broken.

As keenly observed by Mr Fitzpatrick of this website: “The perception of Russia as the anti-Zionist hero of the Middle East and as an Orthodox Christian ethno state serves the final goal of hoodwinking the last bastion of opposition to global communism: Western nationalists/conservatives. Win them over and it’s game over. This is where we are at today. Putinist Russia and the Trump regime are all about streamlining conservative/nationalist sentiment into communist hands in Russia. The Western Left is already Marxist; all that is left is to honeypot conservatives and anti-communists. This goal is almost a done deal, as most in the alt media and in the nationalist cause are pro-Russia, pro-Trump. What Jewry does next remains to be seen.” (69)

As Dugin has stated:

“Western Europe is experiencing a sunset, it will lose its identity. I am a follower of René Guenon (a gnostic), who recognized the crisis of Western societies far before the 21st century.” (70)

We know from the Protocols of Zion (No. 10) and from Rabbi Schneerson’s speech in 1994 how in operation of the synagogue, “The President is a screen, seemingly elected by a popular vote (and we will forge electoral procedures in such a way that they will seem so that everything would seem legitimate), and we are going to do all our necessary business from behind this screen.” (71)

Recognising the synagogue’s masterplan is phased, in order to destroy the conservative/nationalist/capitalist identity of the West, such types have been brought to prominence by the synagogue in the current time. In key example President Trump, conservative British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and BREXIT party leader Nigel Farage.
It is likely that the synagogue will blow the financial system on their watch (possibly in mask of a ‘no-deal’ BREXIT and perhaps in the mix, the US/China ‘trade war’) in order to associate the calamity with this identity. Apart from the ensuing financial collapse leading to civil disturbance as described above, the conservatives/nationalists/capitalist constituency will be shepherded towards Putin in search of alternative, in plan as described by Mr Fitzpatrick. The possible revelations of Jeffrey Epstein (seemingly a long-range Kompromat operation by the Mossad/Soviet nexus) could add to tarnishing this identity and accentuating the narrative of Dugin’s Western ‘manic satanic elite’.

The synagogue will have prepared leaders in accord with the future phases of the plan. In Macron, we already have the type of a would-be dictator and such must be in place when martial law is to be imposed on the West. This will include an American President who will be scripted as the chief aggressor in cause of WW3.

In all, a fractured West, financial calamity, grave civil disorder/government repression and a new ‘aggressor’ Western Soviet Union controlled by a ‘manic satanic elite/globalists’. The stage is then set for the East to act as ‘liberators’ in the WW3 script as above.

ULTIMATE END – WORLD SYNAGOGUE DOMINATION
In summary of synagogue strategy, WW2 was deigned by the synagogue to destroy German power forever, establish the Israeli state, to impose communism on Eastern Europe in form of ‘liberation’ from Nazi Generalplan Ost, to destroy Eastern Christianity and to kill off millions of the white race.

In symmetry, WW3 is designed to destroy American power forever, establish a Greater Israel, impose communism (hidden in guise of the Perestroika Deception) on the entire world in form of the ‘liberation’ of the West from a ‘manic satanic elite/globalists’, to destroy Christianity in the entire world and to kill off 10’s millions of the white race.

There needs to be a conflict with Israel and the Arab nations, so that  undercover of war, Arab lands can be cleared in accord with the ‘Oded Yinon-Plan’ of the construction of a ‘Greater Israel’ from ‘the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates’. (72) Hence Mr Bahman Nassiri, an Iranian freemason now whistle-blower, testified in revelation of a secret freemasonic group in Washington D.C. called ‘The Eagles’:

“The Eagles’ master plan is to set the entire Middle East on fire through revolutions, social unrest, and wars. Syria will be the last war before the ‘big war’ which will target Iran. Mr. Nassiri said he fears the attack on Iran may erupt into WW3. He said the secret society’s master plan calls for turning the entire Middle East into a seething hotbed of hatred for the USA and Israel.” (73)

Mr Benjamin Freedman who as we mentioned above was intimate with the war machinations of the synagogue, foresaw in 1961 how they would script the final world war, “When United States troops appear in the Middle East to fight with the Zionists as their allies to prevent the return of these people who were evicted from their homes in the 1948 armed insurrection by the Zionists who were transplanted there from Eastern Europe… when that happens, the United States will trigger World War 3.” (74)

Yet, Syria and Iran are known Russian assets and also Palestine. RT reported that Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas and Ali Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader are former graduates of the Russian Patrice Lumumba university, which trains future foreign leaders. And we find that that Israel established Hezbollah and Hamas and Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan is possibly a crypto-Jew. (75) So the synagogue have the control to ensure the conflict is managed to the ‘Greater Israel’ objective. Also, they will seek to facilitate the ‘accidental’ destruction of any remnant of the life of Christ in Israel.

The nuclear destruction of New York and Washington has been depicted in sculpture at the freemasonic Cathedral of St John the Divine in New York. These particular sculptures were made in 1997. They are not a reference to 9-11, as they clearly depict clearly the destruction of both cities via missiles/vast explosions; (76)

As with the freemasonic murals in the US referred to earlier, that depict coming civil disorder and repression in the West, this ‘foretelling’ of events planned by the synagogue is commonly called ‘Revelation of the Method’. However, in the first place, it is satan who is the ape of God, communicating his plans through his servants, Amos 3:6-7 & 1 Corinthians 14:6: “Shall there be evil in a city, which the Lord hath not done? For the Lord God doth nothing without revealing his secret to his servants the prophets………But now, brethren, what shall I profit you, unless I speak to you either in revelation or in knowledge or in prophecy or in doctrine?”

After Western defeat in the war, in forward planning, the aforementioned FEMA camps will have been planned not only for pre-war martial law, but in finer filter of ‘dissidents’ during subsequent Russian and Chinese occupation of the US. As said above, ahead of destruction, the Western manufacturing base has been deliberately transferred to the East and the West is being filleted of its intellectual property and anything else of prime value the East and Israel can get their hands on. (77)

As concerns the destruction of Christianity, it is stated in Protocol 17, “We have long past taken care to discredit the priesthood of the goyim, and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. Freedom of conscience has been declared everywhere, so that now only years divide us from the moment of the complete wrecking of that Christian religion…. When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nations towards this court. When, however, the nations fling themselves upon it, we shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to save excessive bloodshed. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the entire strength of this place.”

And in selection of Jewish writings, “The Kingdom of Rome, however, must be exterminated, because when corrupt Rome is destroyed, salvation and freedom will come to God’s Chosen People.”

“What the Prophets foretold about the destruction of Edom in the last days was intended for Rome, as Isaiah explains (Ch. 34:1) Come near, ye nations, to hear . . . For when Rome is destroyed, Israel shall be redeemed.” (78)

The Pope will be replaced by the Jewish Moshiach (antichrist) whose arrival was sought to be hastened by Rabbi Schneerson in conversation with Benjamin Netanyahu, who assured him ‘we’re doing, we’re doing’. (79)

He will rule from Jerusalem in ape of Christ – Matthew 5:35 …’Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great king’, which will become the ‘spiritual’ capital of the world.

Moscow will become the ‘civil capital’ as Dugin reveals or the ‘Third Rome’, in succession of Imperial Rome and medieval Constantinople.

‘Romania, Macedonia, Serbian-Bosnia’ and Greece – Orthodox collectivist East – will unite with Moscow the ‘Third Rome’ and reject the rational-individualistic West.’ (80)

The relationship between Russia and Israel will be as the spiritual (Jerusalem) to the secular (Moscow). Ultimately the spiritual is the controlling power as the soul governs the body. Hence, Putin visiting Jerusalem in 2012, donned the yarmulke and bent the knee to the ‘spiritual’, in praying for the rebuilding of the 3rd temple which signals the arrival of the moshiach, “An Israeli bystander called out in Russian, ‘Welcome, President Putin.’ Putin approached the man, who explained the importance of the Temple Mount and the Jewish Temple. Chadrei Charedim, an Orthodox Hebrew news site, reported that Putin responded, ‘That’s exactly the reason I came here – to pray for the Temple to be built again.” (81)

Chabad Lubavitch website, “Maimonides teaches that the Temple will be built by Messiah himself, and in fact its construction will be one of the signs that he is indeed the Messiah.” (82)

The plan of Jerusalem as the absolute capital of the world was revealed by French super- Jew Jacques Attali (some call him the ‘Lord of Europe’) in 2010, “One can imagine, dreaming of a Jerusalem becoming the planet’s capital that will one day be unified around a world government.” (83)

But the ‘dream’ of the synagogue, will be a nightmare for the non-Jews.

The ‘gentiles’ will become technocratic slaves through a microchip necessary for all transactions, which in function is being prepared through Chinese global 5G roll-out. (84) As the late Rabbi Ovadia Yosef said in 2010, “Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat… That is why gentiles were created.” (85)

The Noahide laws will be implemented, which in banning worship of idols, will be outlaw Christianity. (86) The prototype of life is the Chinese ‘social-credit’ system. The synagogue will work to eventually reduce to nothing the white races.

In all, final world synagogue domination – a 1000 year ‘Pax Judaica’ or as Rabbi Schneerson said at the beginning of this article the ‘conquering all the tribes and kingdoms, their subordination to our superior nation, chosen by God of Israel.’

Simply, global Pharaonic servitude for the non-Jew.

WHAT DO WE DO?
Luke 18:1 – ‘And He spoke also a parable to them, that we ought always to pray, and not to faint.’

That the West is virtually completely blinded to the Perestroika Deception and that we are encircled by communism readying for military conquest, must be seen as the penultimate punishment from God, prior to the ultimate punishment in form of the antichrist.

2 Thessalonians 2:10 – “God shall send them the operation of error, to believe lying.”

In symmetry, the same is true regarding the current worldview of the first-grade antichrist Vladimir Putin, in how the world will view antichrist, Apocalypse 13:3-4 –  ‘And all the earth was in admiration after the beast….. saying: Who is like to the beast?’

When the antichrist comes, we will seek to expose him to others and if successful, a flood of blindness will be lifted. This should be our general strategy now in terms of Putin and in part 1, we have given definitive proof he is an acolyte of Lenin and a fake Christian/crypto-Jew. We have exposed the Perestroika Deception and that East is preparing to conquer the West. Therefore, we must work busily to expose these truths and not only in the West but in the East, as the Russians and Chinese are being deceived to combat with the West, in end of their own slavery. That is the plan of the synagogue for all gentiles.

The Jews Putin and Medvedev are willing to destroy 10’s millions of both Eastern and Western lives. It is necessary that the synagogue should have their own in the public leadership positions, because their ‘religion’ permits them to do this. In the Zohar it says Christians are idolators whose existence hold captive the Jews and whose destruction heralds complete Jewish freedom:

“The People of the Earth are idolaters, and it has been written about them: Let them be wiped off the face of the earth. Destroy the memory of the Amalekites. They are with us still in this Fourth Captivity, namely, the Princes of Rome. . . who are really Amalakites.”

“It is certain that our captivity will last until the princes of the gentiles who worship idols are destroyed.”

And the Zohar promises those who destroy Christian nations will have a high place in heaven, “In the palaces of the fourth heaven are those who lamented over Sion and Jerusalem, and all those who destroyed idolatrous nations … and those who killed off people who worship idols are clothed in purple garments so that they may be recognized and honored.” (87)

Let us be aware that it is likely that more crypto-Jews will appear in leadership in the West, who will also have no ‘theological’ qualms about killing 10s millions of gentiles in the synagogue’s manufactured WW3.

It is divined from research that the notice period for the attack by the East is when NATO is dissolved and it will happen overnight in surprise. That gives us between 1-3 years to make some headway and try to get in front of their strategy to disrupt it. National military must be prioritised for discrete enlightenment, for we face the synagogue controlling our governments against ourselves – they are a de facto occupying power. As with the Roman proconsul quoted in Scripture above from whose influence the Jew Elymas was removed by St Paul, the synagogue influence (and freemasonry) on our government and nations must be removed, to restore the moral order and that liberty, prosperity and peace may reign.

With thanks to the Blessed Virgin Mary for this information. St Louis Marie de Montfort – True Devotion to Mary, “But the humble Mary will always triumph over Satan, the proud one, and so great will be her victory that she will crush his head, the very seat of his pride. She will unmask his serpent’s cunning and expose his wicked plots. She will scatter to the winds his devilish plans and to the end of time will keep her faithful servants safe from his cruel claws.” (88)

References
1) Speech of Rabbi Schneerson – strategies of control towards synagogue world domination.
https://justice4poland.com/2016/05/17/chabad-leader-messiah-menachem-mendel-schneerson-on-his-plans-for-destroying-ukraine-and-russia-reprint/
2) Rabbi Harry Waton – communism tool of world Jewish domination.
http://mailstar.net/waton-program.html
3) The Hidden Empire – The structure of the synagogue global control apparatus (see pages 36-39 -The Powerful Kahal).
http://www.thechristianidentityforum.net/downloads/Hidden-Empire.pdf
4) 17th Protocol of the Elders of Zion  – the Kahal (para. 9).
https://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion6.htm#protocol%20No.%2017
5) Jesuit exposition,1890; ‘The Jewish Question in Europe’. – Quote; Part II, section VII  ‘World Jewish Alliance’.
http://www.catholicapologetics.info/apologetics/judaism/jewrope.htm
6) Harold Rosenthal – Jewish control of US Presidents; ‘Every US president since Roosevelt has been our man.’
https://www.biblebelievers.org.au/tyranny1.htm#The%20Hidden%20Tyranny
7) Admiral Thomas Moorer – quoted article ‘Israel’s Fifth Column; exercising control from inside the government.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50205.htm
8) Admiral Barry Domville: From Admiral to Cabin Boy – UK controlled by Judeo-masonic combination.
http://www.spearhead.co.uk/0411-ib.html
9) Jewish French journalist Rene Kroos, 1922 – ‘There is a Jewish conspiracy against all Nations; in France it is at present the actual reigning power.’
https://theevilofzionismexposedbyjews.weebly.com/10-what-zionist-and-anti-zionist-jews-have-said-about-the-zionist-new-world-order.html
10) Harold Rosenthal – synagogue control of communist Russia – managed from Tel Aviv.
https://www.biblebelievers.org.au/tyranny1.htm#The%20Hidden%20Tyranny
11) Anatoly Golitsyn
http://www.jrnyquist.com/the-psychopath-under-the-bed.html
12) Chinese communism facilitated by Skulls and Bones secret society and Jews.
https://zaidpub.com/2017/12/07/mao-was-a-yale-man-with-skull-and-bones/
https://forward.com/schmooze/159051/a-jew-in-maos-china/
13) Louis Marschalko – Jews operating in key positions within the Soviet, US governments during WW2/United Nations.
https://jamiefreeman.news/educate-yourself/cn/worldconquerorchapter17.html
14) Protocols of Zion 10 (paragraphs 11-16) – ‘Puppet Presidents’.
https://www.biblebelievers.org.au/przion4.htm
15) WW2 designed by the synagogue – attested by the President of the World Jewish Congress Dr. Chaim Weizmann, 1942.
https://carolynyeager.net/history-world-jewish-congress
16) Jew Max Nordau – WW1 pre-planned.
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_International_Jew/Volume_1/Chapter_14
17) Mr Benjamin Freedman – Jewish machinations in WW1 and WW2 – towards WW3.
http://mailstar.net/freedman.html
18) Louis Marschalko – The World Conquerors ‘Millionaire Bankers Back Bolsheviks.’
https://jamiefreeman.news/educate-yourself/cn/worldconquerorchapter4.html
19) Holocaust fraud.
1946 Red Cross report exposes Holocaust hoax – only 271,000 (without Jewish distinction) died in concentration camps and no ‘gas chambers’ reported.
https://truedemocracyparty.net/2012/06/red-cross-expose-judaic-holocaust-hoax/
140 occurrences of the word ‘holocaust’ and the number 6,000,000 before the Nuremberg Trials began.
https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t837103/
Dr. Benedikt Kautsky, Austrian Social Democrat and Jewish prisoner of various concentration camps from 1938-1945, including three years in Auschwitz.
‘I was in the big concentration camps in Germany. I must truthfully state that in no camp have I ever seen anything that might have resembled gas chambers.’
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v16/v16n3p32_Weber.html
Esther Grassman, prisoner of Auschwitz and Buchenwald.
‘I saw no gas chambers, nor even heard of them until after my release.’
https://12bytes.org/articles/history/rescuing-israel-the-holocaust-index/rescuing-israel-the-holocaust-the-quotes
Holocaust deprogramming course.
https://holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com/
20) Hitler was a Jewish puppet/actor.
Nazi party member Ernst Ehrensperger denounces Hitler ‘as a traitor and Jewish puppet’.
http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/2019/04/in-1921-nazi-party-member-ernst.html
Russian National Iskander Hashim – Ashkenazi Jews used Hitler as a Puppet. Sephardi Jews established Soviet communist party.
9m 13s – 10m 47s
Analyst James Corbett – Hitler a Rothschild.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8ihB1wzJGM&feature=youtu.be

21) Nazi Generalplan Ost a decoy for the imposition of communism on Eastern European in ‘liberation’ by the Soviet Union. 

22) Summary of ‘The Controversy of Zion’ by Mr Douglas Reed, 1956.
https://www.controversyofzion.info/Summary_eng.htm
23) East/West divide agreed by US and the Soviet Union, to last 40 years.
8m 31s – 9m 35s
24) US Secretary of State James Byrnes – member of the elite masonic group the ‘Society of Cincinnati.’
‘Bernard M. Baruch: Financial Genius, Statesman, and Adviser to Presidents.’ By Harry Irving Shumway. Foreword by James F. Byrnes, Secretary of State. Appendix by Bernard M. Baruch.
https://academic.oup.com/jah/article-abstract/33/3/503/742631?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Society of Cincinnati – freemasonic origin.
http://www.themasonictrowel.com/masonic_talk/stb/stbs/90-04.htm
See his name registered ‘Honorary members – Government Officials.’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_the_Cincinnati#Government_officials_2
25) Synagogue takes control of US atomic energy program.
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/worldconquerorchapter14.shtml
26) Lecture of Dr Richard Day – ‘there is much more cooperation between East and West than most people realise.’
https://rense.com/general94/nwoplans.htm
27) Russian defector – Kissinger and David Rockefeller present in Kremlin for meetings during the ‘Cold War’.
http://newswithviews.com/iserbyt/iserbyt3.htm
28) Perestroika Deception – objectives and operation.
https://thecontemplativeobserver.wordpress.com/tag/communist-long-range-strategy/
29) Fake Sino-Soviet split (scissors strategy).
https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/12569-second-october-socialist-revolution?tmpl=component
30) Angela Merkel a Soviet agent.
https://thecontemplativeobserver.wordpress.com/2018/08/30/has-todays-unified-germany-become-de-facto-a-socialist-one-party-state/
31) Book ‘Perestroika Deception’ by Antoliy Golitsysn – his praise of James Angleton (page v).
https://www.chinhnghia.com/GOLITSYN(Anatoliy)-Perestroika_Deception_(1998).pdf
32) Michael Collins Piper provides evidence that Angleton was pivotal in the cover-up of JFK assassination (ref. pg. 95).
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Assassinations_page/Chapters_Five-Eight_FJ.html
33) Monument erected to the honour of Angleton in Jerusalem, after his death.
https://deepstateblog.org/2019/03/09/in-honor-of-james-angelton-founding-father-of-the-cia-mossad-alliance/
34) Professor Anthony Sutton – How the West supported the Bolsheviks in 1917, raised Hitler and also the Soviet Union.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdNCr1MjROU&t=1199s

35) Norman Dodd 1953: Tax-Exempt foundations working to merge the USA with the Soviet Union on orders of the White House.
https://oathkeepers.org/2016/07/norman-dodd-on-tax-exempt-foundations-2/
36) Charlotte Iserbyt – merger of Soviet and US educational systems under President Reagan.
https://newswithviews.com/iserbyt/iserbyt9.htm
37) Jewish journalist A M. Rosenthal – Soviets and US working towards a NWO via the UN Security Council.
http://www.angelfire.com/nv/cceducate/nwoquotes.html
38) Clinton changes US strategic nuclear policy from ‘launch on warning’ to ‘absorb first strike.’
http://brainbender.blogspot.com/2013/11/pdd-60-abandonment-of-on-warning.html
39) Obama purposely weakens the US military.
https://www.infowars.com/why-are-dozens-of-high-ranking-officers-being-purged-from-the-u-s-military/
40) Jewish banker Otto Kahn – nations are dissolved that do not conform with the Jewish ‘synthesis’.
https://www.henrymakow.com/2014/02/Israel-is-the-City-of-the-Future.html
41) Crimes of Yeltsin and Putin covered-up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin
42) Putin is a crypto-Jew and fake Christian (and Medevedev).
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/06/14/sanhedrin-addresses-putin-as-jewish-king/
43) Alexander Dugin – the West converted to the ‘New Soviet Union’/society oppressed by an ‘evil Western cabal/globalists’.
http://www.4pt.su/en/content/principles-and-strategy-coming-war
44) Alexander Dugin – ‘Russia must ‘liberate’ Europe from the liberal elite.
https://www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/russians-must-save-europe-liberal-elite
45) Western synagogue script of  ‘manic satanic elite’ – General Wesley Clark – the US will attack 7 countries in 5 years
46) Wesley Clark – ‘There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th-century idea and we are trying to transition it into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.’
http://birthofanewearthblog.com/the-jewish-agenda-to-destroy-the-white-race/
47) Rabbi Schneerson – plan of ‘secret active work on the structuring of the population according to the system necessary to us.’
https://justice4poland.com/2016/05/17/chabad-leader-messiah-menachem-mendel-schneerson-on-his-plans-for-destroying-ukraine-and-russia-reprint/
48) Czech Major-General Jan Sejna and Col. Stanislav Lunev reveal Eastern attack plans.
https://bwcentral.org/2016/05/the-manifesto-of-constitutional-american-nationalism-sovietrussianred-chinese-intentions-for-conquest-of-the-united-states-part-3/
49) Czech anti-communist Petr Cibulka – Russia sponsoring Islamic terrorists as first wave before attack of the West.
http://www.jrnyquist.com/cibulka_2005_0417.htm
50) Soviet analyst J R Nyquist – The West to be struck with Russian special operation ‘Islamic terror’ before Eastern attack.

51) Kissinger peddles the synagogue script – China will be innocent of future WW3.
(44:08 – 44:30)
52) Quoted ‘The New tactics of Global War’ by J R Nyquist/B.Baruch: Dmitri Medvedev 2007 – ‘We must be prepared to extend our influence and save the world.’
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=ZXtuDQAAQBAJ&pg=PT211&lpg=PT211&dq=dmitri medvedev – we must be prepared to extend our influence and save the world&source=bl&ots=N1Sw4qIb7R&sig=ACfU3U3DtS7yDw8fuHIi0rwVFPLN2p_73Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi_wLKnwLfjAhWqSRUIHcvKDicQ6AEwAHoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false
53) Alexander Dugin – the USA and Europe must be split.(see paragraph ‘Two Wests’).
https://www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/sco-summit-chinese-dragon-and-russian-bear-multipolarity-forces
54) Petr Cibulka – Russia seeking to split USA and Europe.
https://www.worldaffairsbrief.com/keytopics/Communism.html
http://www.jrnyquist.com/petr_cibulka_2003_0310.htm
http://www.jrnyquist.com/cibulka_2005_0501.htm
55) Macron working to the split of USA and Europe/synagogue puppet and freemason.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/emmanuel-macron-european-army-france-russia-us-military-defence-eu-a8619721.html
Macron to celebrate Russia ‘Victory day’ in 2020;
https://112.international/politics/macron-is-going-to-visit-russia-on-victory-day-next-year-41236.html
Macron a puppet of the Jews. Paraded as a trophy by Francis Kalifat – Head of the organisation of French Jewish Institutions (CRIF) at their annual dinner in 2019;
Macron is a freemason
https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/04/-rothschild-rentboy-emmanuel-m.html
56) Protocols of Zion – deliberate financial collapse (Protocol 3)
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Learned_Elders_of_Zion#Protocol_III_Methods_of_Conquest
57) Global debt 3 times global GDP
https://www.iif.com/Portals/0/Files/Global%20Debt%20Monitor_January_vf.pdf
58) Notional value of outstanding OTC derivatives $544 trillion
https://www.bis.org/publ/otc_hy1905.htm
59) Russia/China could launch gold-backed currency
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/04/08/russias-new-gold-rush-could-shake-up-the-international-monetary-system-a65131
60) Fyador Dostoevsky – Revolutions are formed through moral corruption
http://passionatepolitics.eu/dostoevsky-demons-radicalism/
61)  Frankfurt School – ‘We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.’
https://danielsolis.cz/the-frankfurt-school-conspiracy-to-corrupt/
62) Pope Pius VIII ; ‘Traditi Humiltati’ – Western morals purposely corrupted to create revolutionary socialists (para. 7)
https://www.papalencyclicals.net/pius08/p8tradit.htm
63) George Bush Jr reveals plan of revolution in reference to Fyodor Dostoevsky’s books ‘Demons’
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2005/01/fire-in-mind.html?m=0
64) In his inauguration speech, George Bush Jr speaks in allegory of satan, who ‘guides the storm’ of events.
65) A communist blueprint for the US – Obama’s National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order of 2012.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/martial-law-under-another_b_1370819?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAALxY1nmd7p16I9FZNJLlPcs9WWAEei4Cm3tQXiarRtDhwYoEA2ybdJuN5WHtw1AR1nirxisCDQVRmWsF4Os0jGeCItMgiTDF-bHUsrlHjhUoJAAYnZNq7ef8mlSIC9K0BT94kbtwx7hn0POSA4yUGErDT6Po0ehHg_pmK-6VrLo3
https://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1464.cfm
66) A communist blueprint for the UK – the Civil contingencies Act of 2004.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/aug/09/sweeping-powers-civil-contingencies-act
67) Over 800 martial law FEMA camps documented in the US.
https://globalpossibilities.org/us-fema-concentration-camps-in-case-of-martial-law-full-list/
68) Petr Cibulka – Russia actively promoting the civil collapse of Western society.
http://www.jrnyquist.com/cibulka_2005_0417.htm
http://www.jrnyquist.com/cibulka_2005_0501.htm
69) Tim Fitzpatrick – on the plan to shepherd the entire West to Putin.
https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2019/01/14/the-kremlin-directs-the-anti-zionist-movement-on-behalf-of-israel/
70) Dugin – ‘Europe will lose its identity.’
https://www.geopolitica.ru/en/article/russians-must-save-europe-liberal-elite
71) Rabbi Mendel Schneerson – how the synagogue fixes elections of their chosen candidates.
https://justice4poland.com/2016/05/17/chabad-leader-messiah-menachem-mendel-schneerson-on-his-plans-for-destroying-ukraine-and-russia-reprint/
72) Greater Israel: The Zionist Plan for the Middle East
https://www.globalresearch.ca/greater-israel-the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east/5324815
73) Mr Bahman Nassiri – WW3 scenario as revealed by Washington freemasonic group ‘The Eagles’.
http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/1690772108.html
74) Benjamin Freedman – The Role of the Jews in WW1 and WW2 and on a future WW3.
http://mailstar.net/freedman.html
75) The Russia Today presenter mentions with much pride- see below 1:41min – two current heads of state as former graduates of the Patrice Lumumba university, Mahmoud Abbas and Ali Khamenei, Iran’s Supreme Leader.
http://www.azarmehr.info/2012/02/irans-supreme-leader-patrice-lumumba.html
More on Iran/Russian connections
https://founderscode.com/comrade-ayatollah-always-points-back-russiaussr/
Israel established Hezbollah and Hamas
https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2014/12/02/israels-top-spy-kidnapped-eichmann-ran-pollard-created-hezbollah/
Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan is possibly a crypto-Jew
https://blogit.mvlehti.net/eurostokolhoosi/2016/07/17/turkish-crypto-jew-president-erdogan-destroying-europe/
76) Freemasonic  St John the Divine Cathedral – New York and Washington destroyed
https://untappedcities.com/2017/10/26/facade-of-cathedral-st-john-the-divine-depicts-the-apocalyptic-fall-of-nyc/
77) Ex CIA Phil Giraldi: ‘Israel Steals US Technology.’
https://gosint.wordpress.com/2017/05/11/former-cia-phil-giraldi-israel-steals-us-technology/
One in Five U.S. Companies Say China Has Stolen Their Intellectual Property
https://fortune.com/2019/03/01/china-ip-theft/
78) Christianity/Rome to be destroyed for the triumph of Israel
http://www.talmudunmasked.com/chapter15.htm
79) Rabbi Mendel Schneerson exhorts Benjamin Netanyahu to hasten the coming of the Jewish Messiah ‘Moshiach’ (antichrist – John 5:43 & 2 Thessalonians 2:1-12).
26-54 s
80) Alexander Dugin – Foundations of Geopolitics: Romania, Macedonia, Serbian-Bosnia’ and Greece – Orthodox collectivist East – will unite with Moscow the ‘Third Rome’ and reject the rational-individualistic West.’
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics
81) Putin prays for the Temple to be built again
https://www.wnd.com/2018/08/the-day-putin-prayed-for-rebuilding-of-temple/
82) Super-Jew Jacques Attali – Jerusalem to be capital of ‘New World Order’

83) Chabad Lubavitch website – ‘Maimonides teaches that the Temple will be built by Messiah himself, and in fact its construction will be one of the signs that he is indeed the Messiah.’
http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/3009476/jewish/Why-Havent-Jews-Rebuilt-the-Temple-Yet.htm
84) Steve Bannon – Chinese global 5G rollout.
37m 3s – 38m 22s
85) Rabbi Ovadia Yosef – Gentiles created to serve Jews.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/5-of-ovadia-yosefs-most-controversial-quotations/
86) Implementation of Noahide laws – Christianity outlawed.
https://www.chabad.org/kabbalah/article_cdo/aid/380332/jewish/The-Mitzvot-of-Non-Jews.htm
87) Jewish teachings authorising killing of Christians and destruction of their nations.
http://www.talmudunmasked.com/chapter15.htm
88) Great St Louis Mary de Montfort – True Devotion to Mary (para. 54)
http://www.catholictreasury.info/books/true_devotion/td5.php