By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 19, 2022 Anno Domini

Many may remember when U.S. presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton publicly named Judaeo-Soviet shill Alex Jones on television during the lead up to the 2016 federal election.

To the “profane”, it appeared a routine standard of naming so called enemies of the progressive social democrat agenda, but in truth, Clinton and her powerful Jewish-Bolshevik organized crime syndicate backers were giving the Austin, Texas-based disinfo artist the push he needed to expand his control and containment over American and Western dissidents to the world Jewish-Communist offensive. The manoeuvre also served to recruit would-be Infowarriors using the Streisand effect.

This contrasts the usual method of handling legitimate dissidents, by way of “dynamic silence“. Allegedly invented by ADL-B’nai Brith member “rabbi” Abraham Feinberg of the American Jewish Committee in 1947, dynamic silence involves ignoring the dissidents as if they didn’t exist and preventing them from reaching any significant audience exposure, thus, they and their potentially damaging message(s) are contained.

“In the first part, unfavoured individuals are denied unmediated exposure to the public. In the second part, only negative aspects of the unfavoured individuals are reported. This starts a downward spiral of de-legitimization in the public eye in which the harder unfavoured individuals try to get public exposure, the more negative and unflattering that expose becomes until, finally, nobody wants to be associated with the ideas or beliefs of the unfavoured individuals.”

If dynamic silence loses its effectiveness over the target dissident, other methods of containment are employed, including: blackmail (often sexual), coercion (often financial), intimidation (threats), and assassination (last resort). Obviously, though, dynamic silence is preferred, as it is quieter and cleaner.

The Clinton push wasn’t the first time that the Judeo-Bolsheviks explicitly and overtly gave a push to Alex Jones through this controlled (or false) opposition sleight of hand. In 2009, the Jewish organized crime syndicate’s American branch the Anti-Defamation League “exposed” (promoted, in actuality) Alex Jones, effectively naming him “the conspiracy king”. This was a message to those in the know that Jones and his Infowars empire were the premier false dissidents leading the narrative for total containment of the authentic dissident movement. Furthermore, the message to the conspirators seems to have been, “hey, he is one of us, so leave him alone no matter how far he takes things”. The idea is to corral as many dissidents as possible into one or few more manageable stables of controlled opposition.

Late journalist/author Michael Collins Piper writes in his 2006 book Judas Goats—The Enemy Within,

“Careful study of recent ADL and SPLC bulletins will frequently (but not always) reveal precisely which “dissident” groups and leaders are being utilized (and promoted) to collect names and assemble dossiers on perceived or potential threats. The ADL and SPLC give a big “build- up” to their own controlled agents so as to give them “credibility.” In other words, the average person will assume that because the ADL and SPLC happen to be attacking an individual or organization, that is some- how “proof” that the individual or organization is legitimate, as evidenced by the ADL or SPLC attacks. Those who affiliate themselves with such “trust” operations do so at their own risk.” (For more on the Soviet Operation Trust)

Last week, the legitimate dissident movement in America perhaps was gifted another clue as to double agents within its ranks when the ADL gave a push to a group of so-called “key anti-Semites”: Eugene Michael Jones, “Brother” Nathanael Kapner, Adam Green, and TruNews. Those familiar with this blog will known that Jones, Kapner, and TruNews are suspected Kremlin assets using anti-Judaism to bait their audience for the eventual switch to Western-Soviet convergence (under the guise of multipolarism, Eurasianism, or National Bolshevism). Adam Green, who has been publicly named by the ADL two times now, is also a very suspect character, whose exact allegiance is unclear but whose agenda seems to be to shift blame to specifically Zionism, America, and the West, which happens to align with the neo-Soviet agenda, particularly as it pertains to Operation SIG; although Green does at times criticize Russia and/or Putin. Most of the time, though, Green has been spreading lies that Christianity is just another Jewish form of control via his seeming handler, the Jewish Christopher Jon Bjerknes, a semi-cucked anti-Zionist.

How amusing is this comment by the ADL:

 “Green calls out both heads of state for visiting Israel’s Western Wall and for allegedly meetings with leaders of the Orthodox Jewish Chabad movement, whom he refers to as ‘the supremacists, lunatic chabad lubavitchers.'”

Green, himself, went to and travelled about Israel with his Orthodox Jewish-friendly, pro-Kremlin sidekick Jake Morphonios with little difficulty, if any. Even though this happened years ago, it’s hard to imagine that the “key anti-Semite” Green would have travelled around Israel with such ease. Was Israeli intelligence/security forces asleep at the time, or was Green perhaps given the green light by a higher up so that he could build his credibility among the dissident movement? Green now has a steadily increasing audience as a direct result. It’s interesting that Piper mentioned data mining (collecting names) as one of the jobs of the ADL’s controlled opposition puppets. Many suspect Adam Green of this very thing (see: If Adam Green is data mining for the ‘gogue…).

After giving a critical description of each ADL-described “key anti-Semite”, the crime syndicate concluded with the usual rhetoric of turning everything back to white supremacism and neo-Nazism. Ironically, Brother Nathanael Kapner still has posted on his site the aforementioned ADL piece promoting Jones form 2009 under the the headline Why Is The ADL Promoting Alex Jones? Now, it is Russian Orthodox parishioner Kapner who is suspected of the very same. The Kapner piece suspecting Jones of controlled opposition actually points to a 2008 ADL propaganda piece that means Kapner. But the more Kapner ramps up his rhetoric that Jewish-controlled Russia is our saviour, the more it appears he is the controlled opposition pretending to expose other controlled opposition. See my infographic showing how controlled opposition systems are flexible enough to allow for crossover between controlled opposition operations..

While the ADL pieces “exposing” anti-Semites does not automatically mean that the subjects are controlled opposition, it appears that in this most recent example of ADL propaganda, the four characters: E. Michael Jones, Nathanael Kapner, Adam Green, and Tru News—all advance Jewish communist goals to varying degrees  for eventual Western-Soviet convergence (see three-part series: The ADL in the world Communist offensive). If these characters posed a legitimate threat to Jewish world power, why didn’t the ADL employ the rabbinic tactic of dynamic silence as espoused by its member ?

*E. Michael Jones, Rick Wiles of TruNews, Michael Hoffman II, and RedIceTV, among others, were singled out by the ADL in 2019 as well (Despite YouTube Policy Update, Anti-Semitic, White Supremacist Channels Remain). Adam Green, along with his “former” handler Alex Jones, were named by the ADL in 2020 (“The Great Reset” Conspiracy Flourishes Amid Continued Pandemic).

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
April 30, 2020 Anno Domini

When the Judeo-Bolsheviks (Judbols) set up Operation Infowars, they didn’t have the foresight to put a plan in place to deal with those dissidents that would figure out it was an op.

So, they made it up as they went along, starting with charismatic charlatans like Mark Shouldice, better known as “Mark Dice”. This character staged a falling out with Alex Jones in the hopes of shepherding former Infowarriors disenfranchised with Jones and his shilling for the easily-manageable playpen of Judeocracy daycare. Dice would even dedicate Fridays as part of his almost daily Youtube rants to “exposing” the buffoonish Jones. Dice got so carried away (perhaps not) that he was even caught calling Alex Jones a “Zionist shill”. Dice later removed that comment—perhaps due to his handlers’ indecision as to whether such drastic measures would backfire.

Long story short, Dice eventually denounced his anti-Jones activism and was brought back into the Infowars fold, where he remains to this day. And brought back with him were former Infowarrior dissidents…brought back to the white-picket-fenced daycare.

The new, reformed operation would have the added benefit of gatekeeping those already red-pilled on the Jewish question by keeping their attention focused squarely on the narrow view of anti-Zionism and the KGB’s Palestinian liberation movement. As expected, Gatekeeper Green has attracted a large swathe of moslems (and PLO-sympathetic Gentiles), who further cloud the truth of the Jewish question—that it is a conspiracy directed by Satan against Christ and His Holy Church.

Unfortunately, for the Judbols and their Infowars operation, it didn’t take long for even simpleton researchers to figure out Green, whether it was the obnoxious Chris Dorsey or Green’s early rival gatekeeper Brendon O’Connell, who correctly identified Green as a “spinoff” of Jones. Infowars has overplayed its hand by giving Green a platform as an Infowars dissident, once with Owen Shroyer, and a second time with the king gatekeeper himself, Alex Jones. Watching the staged opposition between Jones and Green is not only unbelievable but also uninformative. Green can never land a punch on any subject—other than to cry about “Zionists!” all day long—and Jones uses each missed hook to legitimize himself as the poor, censored truth teller, while Green’s groupies receive the dialectic as a victory for their one-dimensional anti-Zionist activism. It’s all so ridiculous.

O’Connell and others have accused Green of being too close to white nationalists, but the opposite seems true. Green’s provocateurish clown posse, the Goyim Defense League (GDL) are too over-the-top to be believed. Furthermore, what possible room could be available for white nationalism in Green’s narrative when it’s a 24/7 victim fest for the plight of the Palestinians and Arabs? Sure, like any good shill, Green must occasionally mention certain things to appeal to the different elements of his audience, being all things to all people (hypernormalization); however, his narrative is clearly centred on Palestinian victimhood and how Israel and the evil West are responsible. And just how in the world Green and his partner in shilling Jake Morphonionos passed into Israel with such ease to report on the Zionist oppression of those innocent Palestinians is anyone’s guess. Israel is not like the West. You can’t just show up and make your way to the taxi pickup after cruising through customs and security. But Green seems to have done just that.

Green’s fetish for an alleged third Temple in Jerusalem, and endless speculation on who will be the next anti-Christ—even though Green is not a Christian—rings of a cheap TV evangelist shekeleering from the dumb and the naive. But more sinister than that, he shares a striking anti-Western narrative with the KGB king of the alt right and anti-Zionism Aleksandr Dugin, who misses no opportunity to villify the West and its Western Jewish leadership whilst ignoring Eastern Jewry and the transfer of power over to it.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

Soviet Romanian defector Ion Mihai Pacepa’s message to the world is a simplistic narrative of the Soviet Union pursuing a campaign to destroy Israel and the Jews, but it’s unclear why.

Soviet anti-Semitism as state policy is a decades-old myth that can only be Jewish disinformation itself, as it serves to distance the Jewish elite and the State of Israel from communism and its controlling organs in Russia and the East Bloc, thus protecting the hidden core of anti-Christ Jewish power in the world.

Operation SIG (Jewish-controlled government), a 1970s KGB plan to control the Middle East through conflict, seems to be a real KGB operation, as it is paralleled by known Israeli strategies like the Oded Yinon Plan (1982). It calls for perpetual conflict through Balkanizing the Arab world by arming and financing warring factions, including against Israel itself. Several Israeli dissidents, like Jack Bernstein and Victor Ostrovsky, corroborate Yinon’s prescriptions. For example, Ostrovsky writes in his book The Other Side of Deception,

“Supporting the radical elements of Muslim fundamentalism sat well with the Mossad’s general plan for the region. An Arab world run by fundamentalists would not be a party to any negotiations with the West, thus leaving Israel again as the only democratic, rational country in the region. And if the Mossad could arrange for the Hamas (Palestinian fundamentalists) to take over the Palestinian streets from the PLO, then the picture would be complete”. —pg. 297

Israel’s long-running Likud party has ruled on policies that appear to be lifted straight from Yinon and Operation SIG. Likud itself was created by Russian and East Bloc Jews like Yitzhak Shamir (former Prime Minister of Israel and Mossad head). Operation SIG’s apparent purpose and direction fits in nicely with the Yinon Plan, yet Pacepa and analysts of Pacepa’s revelations fail to make the obvious connections and draw the correct conclusions. Instead, they misinterpret the evidence that serves only to further victimize the Jewish people and the state of Israel, with the fate of the West only an afterthought in the scheme of things.

Bernstein writes in The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel,

Pacepa’s misreading of what Yinon, Ostrovsky, and Bernstein have clearly laid out perpetuates the deception behind Operation SIG by protecting the real engineers of it. Although Pacepa does include the West as a target of Operation SIG, he gets distracted by the Israeli angle and puts the West in the back seat. Perhaps Pacepa has been allowed to make the revealtions he has under the condition that Israel and the Jews be made the primary targets of Soviet operations.

The destruction of the West seems to be the primary objective for the KGB’s seeding of anti-imperialist, anti-colonialist sentiment in the Arab world (and in Latin America), with anti-Zionism being the convenient conduit by which to achieve this. Anti-Zionism is, in effect, a limited hangout, to use intelligence jargon. Pacepa’s rendering of Operation SIG also serves as a limited hangout, as it leaves no possibility of the Soviet conspiracy and world Jewry of being allies.

Pacepa hints at the truth of the matter, perhaps out of sheer ignorance, when he writes, “The KGB always regarded anti-Semitism plus anti-imperialism as a rich source of anti-Americanism.” Pacepa quotes KGB head Yuri Andropov, suggesting that the KGB’s motive in running Operation SIG as primarily anti-Semitic. “We needed to instill a Nazi- style hatred for the Jews throughout the Islamic world, and to turn this weapon of the emotions into a terrorist blood- bath against Israel”.

If the elite Jewish agenda in Israel is to maintain constant division and warring between Israel and its neighbours, then Andropov’s statement supports this. Pacepa misinterprets this because he doesn’t see that Israel is a Soviet satellite, or he is fake defector (I tend to think he is either a misinformed defector or a censored defector).
Balkanization not only makes it easier to control the Middle East, it also serves to discredit the West, as the West is portrayed as being responsible for the Balkanization of the Middle East through its supposed creation, Israel. Pacepa doesn’t provide a clear motive for his version of Operation SIG. If Russia seeks to destroy Israel and the Jews, then why? Israel doesn’t attack Russia or carry out disinformation against it. Israel’s government largely is compromised of Soviet-derived stock. Communism is largely a Jewish creation. Even today, Jews are overrepresented in communist, socialist, and Marxist movements. Pacepa’s narrative makes no sense, unless he believes the ridiculous notion that the Soviet Union hated Jews just because they were Jews. Pacepa and his supporters would be more believable if they had argued that Soviet motive was simply to control the Middle East as part of its world communist plot, but they just can’t help themselves. They have to victimize Jewry at each and every turn.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
October 1, 2016 Anno Domini

“Limited hangout” is intelligence jargon for a form of propaganda in which a selected portion of a scandal, criminal act, sensitive or classified information, etc. is revealed or leaked, without telling the whole story. The intention may be to establish credibility as a critic of something or somebody by engaging in criticism of them while in fact covering up for them by omitting many details; to distance oneself publicly from something using innocuous or vague criticism even when ones own sympathies are privately with them; or to divert public attention away from a more heinous act by leaking information about something less heinous. —Rational Wiki

From Paul Joseph Watson to Stefan Molyneux, Donald Trump to Milo Yiannopoulos, the rising secular “right wing” in the Americas, dubbed the “alt right” by some, shares one common narrative that reveals it as the limited hangout, controlled-opposition operation that it is.

Omission of the Jewish-Masonic question.

It is completely absent from any meaningful discourse of every single alt right personality, despite that the Jewish question lurks behind all of the revolutionary movements that have conspired against the West and Christian mores for the last 2,000 years to the present time. With the rise of U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump, his perceived populism, and the growing backlash to political correctness, the alt right has sprung up all too quickly, all too conveniently as those disillusioned with the radical leftist world takeover grapple for answers. Right on cue, the controlled-opposition agents have filled in the gaps and have “answered” our questions in a manner that leaves out the more damning, darker truth.

The legitimate right, those identifying with traditional, Hellenic-Christian culture, appear completely oblivious to this hijacking of the right, much in the same way past controlled opposition garnered favour with the right only to later lead it down a dead-end road or, worse, to slaughter.

All the way down the line, the new alt right talking heads have acted as gatekeepers for the Judeo-Masonic establishment. Take for example Stefan Molyneux and his recent example of excusing Jewish over-representation in positions of influence, Paul Joseph Watson’s laughable denial of Jewish influence anywhere in the world, Alex Jones’ playing limited hangout 20-years plus (defending freemasonry, at times allowing for mild, superficial criticism of Israel but omitting the bigger issues regarding Israel and Judaism), or Donald Trump’s total subservience to the Israel lobby and Judaism (AIPAC, Jewish staffers, Zionist foreign policy position, all his kids either married to or dating Jews). Homosexual alt right icon Milo Yiannopoulos, although a more honest Jew (he has admitted Jewish influence in the world), also serves to advance the controlled right’s agenda of Jewish omission by displacing bigger issues with smaller ones (for example, restricting immigration would require kicking all of the Jewish policymakers and their ilk off of the policy boards and replacing them with populists; shallowly criticizing unfettered immigration solves little).

More Jewish alt right gatekeepers
While I appreciate the many truths spoken by alt right talking heads like Breitbart (founded by Jew Andrew Breitbart), homosexual Jew Matt Drudge (Drudge Report), Ezra Levant (Jewish), Lauren Southern (Rebel Media), or the aforementioned personalities, their agenda is, at best, a half measure solution to the world’s problem, at worst, leading the right to its ultimate destruction. They, like CIA front National Review and the John Birch Society, discuss very real issues but are there to homogenize the right whilst omitting the issues that reveal the entire truth—and in that complete truth wherein lies real solutions for the world’s greatest dilemma (incidentally, the National Review has condemned the alt right as racist and anti-Semitic). The only effective method for containing the Judeo-Masonic dilemma has been the Byzantine Solution, or the Vatican’s Sicut Judaeis Non, which would have to be expanded to include freemasonry and its many gnostic offshoots.

Infowars’ Alex Jones is sort of the pioneer of 21st century limited hangout. He was doing it on an international stage long before the current alt right talking heads became as popular as they. It’s only because of Donald Trump and growing public disillusionment with the left that there is a need for a pantheon of limited hangout agents, who have now surpassed Jones in notoriety. Jones, apparently, was the beta test for the establishment’s plan for a rise of the pseudo right.

White nationalists appear to have completely bought into the alt right bait, with personalities like David Duke and Professor Kevin MacDonald riding the Trump, alt right bandwagon; although, MacDonald has demonstrated his awareness of the Jewish involvement in the alt right and is supporting it anyways likely for strategic reasons. White nationalist opposition to Judeo-Masonry has proven itself a failure (National Socialism) and is based in racialism. Only the Church has adequately addressed and dealt with the question. Any notion of the “true” alt right being hijacked from the supposed rightful heir white nationalists by Milo types is ridiculous.

Neither of the two groups are the rightful heirs.

This alt right and its friendly alternative media are not allowing any other talking points to the reach the masses.
Right wing sentiment must not deviate from what the establishment has set out. Dissenting views from the alt right narrative are regarded as divisive, anti-Trump, leftist, or they are simply ignored (dynamic silence). The alt right is a neocon of the necons—its controlled outgrowth that is a false attempt at a return to conservatism. The only true conservatism is one based not in secular populism but in Jesus Christ and the moral order.