“We shall set up our own opposition. Our real opponents, at heart, will accept this simulated opposition as their own and will show us their cards…. Our subjects will be convinced of the existence of full freedom fo speech.”

—Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion 12:11 (Late 19th century)

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 3, 2021 Anno Domini

All controlled opposition are shills but not all shills are controlled opposition.

Everyone shills for their worldview to one degree or another. In general, there is nothing wrong with this. We see our worldview as the best and naturally want the rest of the world to adopt it in order to make the world a better place.

Of course, our worldview might not be what’s best for everyone, but we believe it is. This type of shilling is honest and natural, so long as the one shilling their worldview is transparent about it. But what about all those shills who keep their worldview secret from others yet continue to shill for it? This is when shilling becomes highly suspect. After all, why would someone want to keep their worldview a secret from others?

Someone may have honest reasons for secrecy, especially with increasing public censorship of unpopular opinions. This is totally understandable. However, this covert kind of shilling can be exploited to install controlled opposition operatives as part of counter-intelligence operations of foreign and/or hostile groups. Therefore, it becomes necessary to be able to detect these dangerous shills so as to be able to neutralize their shilling and, hopefully, expose their true motive to the public.

The following are a list of tools you can use to hopefully detect and neutralize controlled opposition shills.

Patterns: the primary method to detect controlled opposition shills is in the patterns they exhibit or exist in their lives. No matter how clever controlled opposition is, they will always exhibit one or more patterns. It’s our job to recognize these patterns. We want to look for patterns in their narratives—which ones they promote and which ones they ignore. We want to look for patterns in the guests they use to advance their shilling message. We also want to look for patterns in the suspected shills’ associates. As the saying goes, “those of a feather, flock together” (Note: finding only scant patterns without other corroborating patterns doesn’t necessarily make one controlled opposition, so be cautious. Above all, be objective.)

Background: we want to look for patterns in the suspected controlled opposition operative’s history. This isn’t always possible, especially if they are a mysterious and secretive character, but when it is possible, dig deep in their history and look for patterns in their education, family, associates, employment, religion, etc. It shouldn’t be difficult to find patterns in a dangerous shill’s background. If the suspect has even remote connections to the intelligence world, big business, lobbyists, we should narrow in even deeper looking for patterns. Finally, the suspect’s birth could also help corroborate other patterns. For example, if the suspect is born Jewish, a red flag should go up in your mind (being Jewish alone without corroborating patterns is not indicative of controlled opposition. You need to keep digging or dismiss the subject as controlled opposition.)

Popularity: A popular character is not necessarily a shill, but it is a strong indicator when discovered alongside other patterns of shillery. The more popular a character, the greater chance there is of controlled opposition. After all, in this anti-Christ system of deception, the devils appearing as angels of light are made stars and given riches and success as a reward for their treason against God and His creation. In contrast, truth tellers are typically marginalized and censored, as were the Hebrew prophets like Jeremiah and Isaiah who condemned the Jews for their self-worship an worship of idols. On that note, being censored, alone, does not clear anyone of suspicion of controlled opposition; so tread softly around this pattern. Many mistakenly believe that censorship connotes legitimacy. If someone is censored yet there are one or more patterns of controlled opposition, that censorship is designed to further mask their true agenda. In other words, the censorship itself is controlled opposition involving controlled opposition! Don’t sweat it, though. It might seem complex at first, but once you begin practicing looking for patterns, it gets easier.

Medium: This is related to popularity. If the suspected shill has easy and much access to mediums of communication, they should be held as suspect, especially today, where the thought police work around the clock trying to restrict access of truth tellers. Is the suspected shill being promoted on multiple mediums by multiple sources? This is highly suspect and should be scrutinized. One method the Judeo-masonic money power uses to neutralize truth speech is through what’s called dynamic silence. Developed by “Rabbi” Feinberg of the American Jewish Committee in 1947, with dynamic silence, according to a scrubbed Wikipedia entry, “unfavoured individuals are denied unmediated exposure to the public. In the second part, only negative aspects of the unfavoured individuals are reported.” A related method used to silence truth tellers is through enemy groups publicly criticizing their own controlled opposition (seemingly paradoxical) so as the criticized shill gets negative attention as opposed to an authentic opponent getting any attention at all. For example, when the ADL or Hillary Clinton publically named Alex Jones instead of critics who had authentic dirt on them. It’s a diversion tactic. If Jones were authentic, they would not name him at all, even if critically, because the Streissand Effect says that even negative attention will bring out the message of the one being criticized. Therefore, it’s best to completely ignore truth tellers, because criticizing them publicly will only give them more attention (to their message). So, if a suspected shill is being publicly criticized by high-profile groups, that is a major red flag. Look for corroborating patterns.

These were the methods I used to successfully call out Alex Jones in the mid 2000s. I didn’t read about it anywhere, I just had a natural aptitude for it. Unfortunately, at the time I discovered the patterns in Alex Jones and tried to warn others about it, nobody would believe me. I was using logical arguments in an attempt to show them, and it wasn’t changing anyone’s mind (so I thought. Later, several contacted me saying that I had helped them wake up to the Alex Jones deception). So, I decided that in order to convince people, I was going to have to come up with some hard data to show them that Jones was working for the bad guys. So, what I did was a key word count analysis of his video documentaries, like this one. This seemed to have more of an effect, and eventually forums and blogs were reposting the data I had collected on Jones and my thesis was starting to seem plausible to more and more people. At that time, I didn’t know about things like the Soviet Trust model, so I wasn’t very confident in my skepticism of people likes Jones, but I just knew something was fishy about him, based on the patterns I had recognized. Eventually, though, it paid off, and I feel corroborated by the passage of time and the acquisition of knowledge. Now you have the tools and the knowledge that took me years to develop.

God speed!

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
April 30, 2020 Anno Domini

When the Judeo-Bolsheviks (Judbols) set up Operation Infowars, they didn’t have the foresight to put a plan in place to deal with those dissidents that would figure out it was an op.

So, they made it up as they went along, starting with charismatic charlatans like Mark Shouldice, better known as “Mark Dice”. This character staged a falling out with Alex Jones in the hopes of shepherding former Infowarriors disenfranchised with Jones and his shilling for the easily-manageable playpen of Judeocracy daycare. Dice would even dedicate Fridays as part of his almost daily Youtube rants to “exposing” the buffoonish Jones. Dice got so carried away (perhaps not) that he was even caught calling Alex Jones a “Zionist shill”. Dice later removed that comment—perhaps due to his handlers’ indecision as to whether such drastic measures would backfire.

Long story short, Dice eventually denounced his anti-Jones activism and was brought back into the Infowars fold, where he remains to this day. And brought back with him were former Infowarrior dissidents…brought back to the white-picket-fenced daycare.

The new, reformed operation would have the added benefit of gatekeeping those already red-pilled on the Jewish question by keeping their attention focused squarely on the narrow view of anti-Zionism and the KGB’s Palestinian liberation movement. As expected, Gatekeeper Green has attracted a large swathe of moslems (and PLO-sympathetic Gentiles), who further cloud the truth of the Jewish question—that it is a conspiracy directed by Satan against Christ and His Holy Church.

Unfortunately, for the Judbols and their Infowars operation, it didn’t take long for even simpleton researchers to figure out Green, whether it was the obnoxious Chris Dorsey or Green’s early rival gatekeeper Brendon O’Connell, who correctly identified Green as a “spinoff” of Jones. Infowars has overplayed its hand by giving Green a platform as an Infowars dissident, once with Owen Shroyer, and a second time with the king gatekeeper himself, Alex Jones. Watching the staged opposition between Jones and Green is not only unbelievable but also uninformative. Green can never land a punch on any subject—other than to cry about “Zionists!” all day long—and Jones uses each missed hook to legitimize himself as the poor, censored truth teller, while Green’s groupies receive the dialectic as a victory for their one-dimensional anti-Zionist activism. It’s all so ridiculous.

O’Connell and others have accused Green of being too close to white nationalists, but the opposite seems true. Green’s provocateurish clown posse, the Goyim Defense League (GDL) are too over-the-top to be believed. Furthermore, what possible room could be available for white nationalism in Green’s narrative when it’s a 24/7 victim fest for the plight of the Palestinians and Arabs? Sure, like any good shill, Green must occasionally mention certain things to appeal to the different elements of his audience, being all things to all people (hypernormalization); however, his narrative is clearly centred on Palestinian victimhood and how Israel and the evil West are responsible. And just how in the world Green and his partner in shilling Jake Morphonionos passed into Israel with such ease to report on the Zionist oppression of those innocent Palestinians is anyone’s guess. Israel is not like the West. You can’t just show up and make your way to the taxi pickup after cruising through customs and security. But Green seems to have done just that.

Green’s fetish for an alleged third Temple in Jerusalem, and endless speculation on who will be the next anti-Christ—even though Green is not a Christian—rings of a cheap TV evangelist shekeleering from the dumb and the naive. But more sinister than that, he shares a striking anti-Western narrative with the KGB king of the alt right and anti-Zionism Aleksandr Dugin, who misses no opportunity to villify the West and its Western Jewish leadership whilst ignoring Eastern Jewry and the transfer of power over to it.

The Judeo-masonic establishment felt enough success with their controlled opposition character Alex Jones that they went and modelled a presidential puppet after him.

That must be quite the honour for the Zionist-created Likudnik cartoon character Alex Jones, who couldn’t contain his glee when Trump was elected President of the United States of America in 2017—something which Jones helped make happen, due to his unwavering support for a presidential candidate. Up until then, he had never in his public life endorsed a presidential candidate. During a live broadcast of Infowars on election night, Jones looked like a giddy school girl when it was announced that Trump had won. For once, Jones showed us that night his real emotions.

True, Alex Jones is not as big (figuratively) as he once was, despite his followers’ relentless boasting of his Youtube subscription numbers. But the intelligence-manufactured model for his persona continues to be a success, as it has thwarted any real progression of dissident paleo-conservatives (truthers, patriots, constitutionalists, etc.)—thwarted them coming together and causing real change in the world by way of siphoning off their pent up rage and frustration and prematurely ejaculating it in a place where its seed is squandered among barren swine and mindless boobs. There has been no fertile land upon which the truther movement has been able to plant and successfully nurture seeds of truth to maturity, other than in the ever-shrinking traditional Church communities (Catholic and Orthodox alike). Since 1996, the counter-intelligence operative Alex Jones has hindered and suppressed any meaningful resistance to the New World Order conspiracy. That has been his primary function. If you haven’t figured this much out by now, there is no point in reading on. Click away now and meander over to any one of the establishment-controlled websites: Breitbart, Zerohedge, or even Infowars.

Moving on. Trump’s appearance on the Alex Jones show during his election run was a symbolic passing of the torch, if you will, of the continuation of the psychological warfare assault on the American people and the world.
Now instead of an over-the-top, loud-mouthed radio host cathartically transmuting our energy and telling us everything we want to hear, the President will assume the role. But this time, we will think we have finally changed things and bucked the system—something Alex Jones failed to do, no matter how many times he repeated to his parrots that “we are defeating the New World Order” or that “the empire is on the run.”

It’s no coincidence that Alex Jones is tied to the same Jewish-Russian organized crime syndicate that Trump is.
It’s also no coincidence that Trump and Jones share virtually all of the same political views. So it is that Jones has worked in tandem with the supposedly anti-establishment Trump-Roger Stone-Netanyahu dirty trickstering, Likudnik tag team. (By the way, it turns out that Roger Stone—that pathetic, buggering swinger—is directly tied to the Jewish-Russian Meyer Lansky organized crime syndicate. More on that in my upcoming fourth part of my series on Trump and the Mossad.) One wonders if the Alex Jones operation dually has served as a proving grounds for a future president. Even in Nixon’s days, Roger Stone was working behind the scenes preparing for a fake populist president who would come into power under the guise of being anti-establishment. Ronald Reagan was a step in that direction but didn’t quite meet the establishment expectations for a controlled opposition puppet. Trump sure has, though, hasn’t he? Look how many people on the Right he has fooled. Nearly all of them.

And look how many of those he has fooled who once also followed Alex Jones but later abandoned him after realizing he was a fraud. They broke free from one tier of deception but then immersed themselves in another tier when they bought that Trump was the real deal. They don’t see the dialectic at work in their overly simplistic analysis of the world conspiracy.

If the Trump persona truly is based on the Alex Jones persona, perhaps we can make a prediction of where Trump’s presidency will go. Right now, Alex Jones, as a character, appears to be on the decline. The truly awakened individuals that once followed him are long gone and now all he has left are mindless “red-pilled” idiots, of mostly millennial, hillbilly, and pothead extraction. His out-of-control behaviour is, perhaps, doing the most damage to his status and reputation. The publicity of his custody-trial with ex-wife Violet revealed a lot about the artificiality of his public character. He is currently married to what appears to be a former hooker. His strange relationship with Hollywood sleaze Charlie Sheen went public a few years ago, and now his former employers are bringing to light even more darker truths of the Alex Jones character. In essence, he is self-destructing. Could Donald Trump follow a similar path? Many think he already is. Both Jones and Trump share the pathology of narcissism, which makes them their own worst enemies—and at the complete mercy of their handlers.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

Like so many other times, you navigate your way to infowars.com or prisonplanet.tv and sit back and unwind while the magic man, Alex Jones, acts as a mouthpiece for all the pent up frustration and anger you harbour towards the encroaching New World Order.

To some, he is just a loud-mouthed Texan with too much time and energy on his hands. To you, he is your soother, your pacifier, your solace amongst a population of the walking dead.

This is Alex Jones’ purpose as an agent provocateur. He defuses and deflects your outrage and aggression (through a process called catharsis) over the dismal state of affairs plaguing our existence. Instead of channeling it in a constructive and useful way, this necessary reactionary energy is internalized by the charismatic Jones, who then releases it through carefully crafted retorts sprinkled over meaningless and disingenuous outbursts that have more bark than bite. The infowars listener gets a definite release of stress through the Jones medium. Not only that, but the viewer is becoming more and more cozy with the brutal realities of global government. Oh, yes, the video presentations and three-hour daily talk shows are informative and thought provoking, but what is really accomplished by all of this?
And where will the outrage be when it matters most?

What do Alex Jones’ detractors say?
The theories of the reasons for Alex Jones being a paid shill or cointelpro agent are many, whether it’s that he is a Vatican/Jesuit agent (false lead), a CIA operative, or, the most likely, a Zionist money grubbing stooge. Regardless of if Jones is working for the CIA or the Mossad, or both, there is a more sophisticated aspect to his mission than just disinformation. And that is to defuse and deflect aggression—much in the same way professional sport does—and to mentally prepare you for what’s coming. Countless truth seekers have successfully demonstrated that Jones is some kind of operative, including the late Bill Cooper, Brother Nathanael Kapner, David Chase Taylor, and others. This information is widely available on the web and on Youtube. But few, if any, have taken a close look at what he is doing on a day-to-day basis through his media empire. Yes, Jones is putting out disinformation, mainly through omission. But most of the time, he is telling the truth; it’s what he leaves out that is the most telling.

Externalization of the Hierarchy via the Infowar
Well read researchers of the Illuminati conspiracy, at some time or another, have come across the theosophical branch of the plot and discovered that the New World Order architects will eventually, ironically, reveal just what they are doing in order to initiate us into their cult and warm us up to its horrific fulfillment. Although it might seem counterproductive for them to do this, it’s actually quite ingenious. The externalization process has a couple of key components:

1. 1. Create apathy & abulia among the learned – This component is central to Operation Mockingbird, led by Alex Jones in the “truth movement”. Initiates are gradually made comfortable (at least subconsciously) with what is happening. Comfort and outrage (discomfort) are polar opposites. If you have listened to Alex Jones for any period of time, you will know that he hammers very bad and negative news at you continually throughout the day. While the news is very real, the way it is presented is meant to break you down, to destroy the outrage and burning passion in you. This bombardment of negative, sometimes conflicting information tends to leave the listener feeling helpless and fearful, but ultimately, it brings them closer to a state of apathy and abulia (loss of will). The proliferation of apathy in general is reciprocal to the increase in power of the Illuminati. The apathy we are experiencing today, especially in North America but no so much in Europe, didn’t happen by accident. It was systematically brought about, mainly through the media and the information age. This apathy is key to the fulfillment of the Illuminati plan, as it provides the consent (by silence) from the masses. Alex Jones-type programming is also designed to sap the energy of the target audience, making them docile and lethargic, which keeps them coming back for more of the Infowar.
   2. Initiate the unlearned into the Kabbalah cult – That is what all the Illuminati symbolism and motifs in the entertainment industry are all about. As renown Satanist Nikolas Schreck stated, the symbolism (the language of the occult) is meant to awaken dormant aspects in the human psyche and prepare unknowing initiates for the coming transformation. Illuminati symbolism also works to control and direct monarch-programmed slaves. (Jordan Maxwell, sometimes a guest on the Alex Jones show, is a more obvious example of a hierarchy externalizer through this method.) Another unconfirmed possible aspect of Jones’ externalization is the use of Illuminati symbols and hand signs. The older prisonplanet logo, a name based in Scientology, could be a stylized all-seeing eye, while the “V” for victory symbol has obvious occult significance. The following video shows how Alex Jones used the Illuminati “V for Victory” symbol for one of his campaigns. Incidentally, 56-year-old Clay Duke held up a Florida school board at gunpoint in 2010. He started firing and was subsequently shot. What’s interesting about this incident is that Duke spray painted the V symbol on the wall before he went on his rampage. Is this the kind of violence Alex Jones was hoping to provoke in people with his subversive “V” campaign? Was Jones hoping to awaken dormant aspects in the minds of his listeners? The following is one of several examples of Jones using “stochastic terrorism” to provoke his Infowars sleepers to unconsciously participate in the Illuminati psychodrama.

With everyone initiated into the Illuminati, through either of the above components of the externalization of the hierarchy, who is left to actively oppose and stop the New World Order takeover? This is a way of controlling the opposition that Soviet butcher Vladimir Lenin could only have dreamed of. Alex Jones is likely completely aware of this subversive manipulation of his listeners. And it is indicative that Jones is involved in the occult, whether it is Freemasonry, Theosophy, Scientology, or all three and more. His occult involvement is an appropriate coupling with his Zionist sympathies. This alert patriot has amassed some clips of Alex Jones disseminating New Age concepts straight out of Helena Blavatsky’s Externalization of the Hierarchy:

Researcher Michael Hoffman, in Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, explains the revelation of the method and shows how our supposed revelators are actually helping the cryptocracy, as I contend in the case of Alex Jones:

They become trapped in the fallacy that exposure of the methods and personnel involved in the cryptocracy’s crimes is, by itself, a tremendous step toward overthrowing the power of the cryptocracy. “If only we could get some of the facts out in the open” is their refrain. I would reply that the process of Hermetic cryptocracy is not stagnant. It is engaged in a remarkable project set into motion millennia ago, an operation which has accomplished most—if not all—of its chief-goals with awe-inspiring dispatch…. Quite the contrary, the cryptocracy has actually been determined to reveal many of its greatest secrets to us “profane ones” for some time now. Veteran independent occult investigators were astonished at the massive disclosure in the 1970s of some of the deepest and most profound secrets of the masonic-Neo-Platonic Hermetic Academy, secrets reserved in some cases for thousand of years for only the highest initiates…Downard translates as “the Revelation of the Method.” This alludes to the process wherein murderous deeds and hair-raising conspiracies involving wars, revolutions, decapitations, (secret archaeo-astronomic deity cult- worship) and every manner of horror show are first buried beneath a cloak of secrecy…and then, when finally accomplished and secured, slowly revealed to the unsuspecting populace  who  watch…deep-frozen… as the hidden history is unveiled… In the circulation of… (anti-Academy) manuscripts…the revelation of the method is accomplished. Truth or consequences…Downard…is acutely aware that in exposing the conspirators he is probably serving the final dictum (in their alchemical formula)…“

In that same book, Hoffman reveals Mystical Toponomy:

Exposure without action against the perpetrators of the crimes revealed, devolves into a kind of perverse advertisement for the prowess of the cryptocrats who are seen as having performed fantastic feats of criminal enterprise with a genius that renders them immune from the consequences.

The entire process as a whole smacks of that familiar occult control device of grotesque mockery of the principle touted, in this case of the notion of exposure leading to punishment and retribution.

The times Alex Jones has actually made a difference in the fight against the Illuminati can probably be counted on one hand. (Alex Jones addressing Austin City Council about the Patriot Act was one of those few times). Most of the time, he is just a showman, taking money from sincere people searching for truth and justice. Jones has never attempted to take action against the perpetrators.  And because his listeners are led down a road to apathy, they don’t rise as leaders. It’s only once they leave Jonestown do they really wake up.

“For seventy years, from the Bolshevik Revolution to the closing years of the Gorbachev regime, militant atheism was the official religion, one might say, of the Soviet Union, and the Communist Party was, in effect, the established church. It was an avowed task of the Soviet state, led by the Communist Party, to root out from the minds and hearts of the Soviet state, all belief systems other than Marxism-Leninism.”

— J. D. Van der Vyver, John Witte – Religious human rights in global perspective: legal perspectives

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 26, 2012 Anno Domini
Part I | Part II

If Christianity were the crypto-Jewish plot Charles Giuliani and his ilk claim it is, why then didn’t the Jewish Bolshevists use it instead of atheism-nihilism (materialism and naturalism) to topple the Tsar and enslave the Russian people? Why did the Jewish-Masonic revolutionaries bring down the Christian aristocracy in once-Catholic France in order to realize the bloody success of the French Revolution?

Giuliani claims Christianity and religion in general are tools for oppression and control yet we find Illuminati regimes past and present using anything and everything diametrically opposed to Christianity to enslave the masses. Godlessness, in fact, was successful in absolutely oppressing and enslaving the Russian and French masses, not Christianity. But with the revolutionaries’ cries of the Jewish-Masonic slogan of “liberty, equality, and fraternity,” constantly echoing in the streets and the labour halls, the takeover had on a mask of liberation and democracy[1] that fooled most.

Now some may argue that the Jewish religion suffered persecution in the Soviet Union, and thus Soviet state atheism could not have been part of the Jewish takeover but, instead, legitimate opposition to it. But this argument holds absolutely no water considering the fact that 90 per cent of Bolshevist officials were Jewish, not to mention leaders Vladimir Lenin, Karl Marx (Moses Mordechai Levi Marx), and Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) were all Jewish. Even Stalin, who was married to a Jewess, founded the Union of Militant Atheists as a means to further eradicate Christianity from Russian culture. (The amount of information surrounding the Jewish engineering of the Russian Revolution is voluminous.)

In a shocking revelation, The Jewish Chronicle Supplement actually admitted on page three of its Feb. 26, 1937 edition that the pockets of Jewish persecution in the Soviet Union were the work of the hands of the Jews themselves and provided a means to an end for the greater Jewish-Bolshevist goals.

“It is a known fact in Russia, in so far as there was persecution of the Jewish religion, it never came from the higher staff authorities but from the Jewish Communists, who were, in most cases, sons of strictly religious fathers….”

Furthermore, we read in an article published in the January 1934 edition of American Jewish Journal:

“There is no doubt that the old, traditional Jewish synagogue is rapidly dying out in Russia. It is not dying because of Communist persecution, as many would like to believe, or any other outside influence, but simply because of a natural law of life. The youth has deserted it. Go over to the Jewish Communist Club on Tverskaya Street and you will find plenty of them.”

Jewish-mandated state atheism was so widespread and untouchable in the Soviet Union that it even regularly got away with defaming Jesus and the much-cherished Russian Orthodox Church. Under the murderous reign of Lenin and Stalin, Christian churches were burned, orthodox priests were tortured and crucified, and average Christians were murdered or rounded up to work as slaves in the Gulags. “Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism,” Lenin once said. Famous Russian playwright Mikhail Bulgakov accused a Soviet atheist magazine, Bezbozhnik (the godless), of being run by Jews in his 1925 diary. (The magazine was shut down in 1941 when the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union.)

“Today I went specially to the editorial office of Bezbozhnik. It is located in Kozmodemyanovsky Lane, not far from the Mossovet building. I was with MS and he charmed me from the outset…..In the evening when I leafed through the issues of Bezbozhnik I was shaken. Not by the blasphemy, of course it knows no limits, but it is only an external feature. The heart of the matter lies in the idea, which can be proved with reference to actual documents: Jesus Christ is depicted as a swindler and a scoundrel: the attack is directed at him. It is not hard to see whose work this is. This is a crime like no other.”

Of course, the Jews’ most revered religious text, the Babylonian Talmud, calls Jesus Christ many horrible things, not the least of which is a “bastard” and the “son of a whore.” It’s hardly a stretch to say that Bezbozhnik was regurgitating aspects of the Jewish Talmud.

Now, Giuliani can downplay my accusations and simply claim not to be an atheist but, instead, some kind of agnostic thinker. He makes a point of not saying exactly to what belief he subscribes. Regardless, his anti-religious rhetoric sprinkled with cheap critiques of International Jewry (“Elite Jew Pigs! Elite Jew Pigs!”) reveals that he is a dedicated nihilist walking in the tradition of Jewish Bolshevism, what is today called cultural Marxism. He attempts to cloud his audience’s perception of this by raising random shades of morality. On a recent Truth Hertz show, he criticized the television show Two and a Half Men for promoting “filth.”

Nihilism is fundamentally utilitarian and agnostic. For Giuliani to deny that, as a nihilist he has much in common with socialist and radical leftist Jews, is deceptive or self-deceptive. And this applies to all agnostic types in the movement who erroneously believe they serve as a bastion of pure anti-Judaism. For them to criticize Christianity as being a Jewish subversive organization is highly inappropriate and hypocritical.

Giuliani continually talks out both sides of his mouth. He calls the Bible evil while denying the validity of Christianity or religion at all. Meanwhile, Christianity is arguably the foremost religion to define evil and establish a standard by which to measure it. So, Giuliani rejects the Bible but accepts the Christian concept of evil. And he, nor his followers, see the contradiction in this?

Could Giuliani’s utter contempt for the Bible and his obsession with the idea of an unjust God springing from it possibly reveal his inner turmoil? The following assertion by the late Father Seraphim Rose seems to sum up well Giuliani’s struggle.

“Atheism, true ‘existential’ atheism burning with hatred of a seemingly unjust or unmerciful God, is a spiritual state; it is a real attempt to grapple with the true God.… Nietzsche, in calling himself Antichrist, proved thereby his intense hunger for Christ.” —Nihilism: The Root of the Revolution of the Modern Age

Giuliani as a psychoanalyst in the tradition of Freud
In part 1 of this series, I claimed that Giuliani bordered on psychoanalyzing Christians and religious persons. But upon further reflection and after listening to more of his shows and reading his “books” (they are really nothing more than pamphlets for sale), I would go so far as to say that he indeed does exhibit the behaviour of a typical psychoanalyst.

“Folks, it’s schizophrenia; it really is,” he says of Christianity in one of his many and incessant pathologizations of Christianity and Western Culture.[2] This is just as Jewish psychoanalytic father Sigmund Freud proposed, that Christianity was nothing more than a mental illness, a neurosis that must be wiped out in order to free humanity. Christian self-denial and the suppression of sex, they say, result in evil and anti-Semitism via projection.

“Jews suffer to a lesser extent than gentiles from the erosion of cultural supports for high-investment parenting,” writes Professor Kevin MacDonald, one of the foremost critics of Freud today, “and Jews benefit by the decline in religious beliefs among gentiles. As Podhoretz (1995, 30) notes, it is in fact the case that Jewish intellectuals, Jewish organizations like the American Jewish Congress, and Jewish-dominated organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union have ridiculed Christian religious beliefs, attempted to undermine the public strength of Christianity, and have led the fight for unrestricted pornography. The evidence of this chapter indicates that psychoanalysis as a Jewish-dominated intellectual movement is a central component of this war on gentile cultural supports for high-investment parenting.”[3]

So where does the American Jewish Congress end and Charles Giuliani begin? The above statement by MacDonald is all the more interesting considering MacDonald himself is an atheist. He does not see Christianity as furthering Jewish evolutionary strategies but, instead, acting as a hindrance toward them.

Christianity easily the dominant force in the struggle against Jewish power
Whether it’s the Spanish Inquisition, the writings of the Church Fathers over 2,000 years, or the various Christian-initiated European pogroms, there is simply no question that Christianity has led the charge against Jewish power throughout the ages. Even the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, where the sacred Jewish Temple of Solomon was destroyed and one million Jews killed, is considered to be the work of God through the Roman Empire, foretold in Christ’s Olivet discourse.

“And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to [him] for to shew him the buildings of the temple. And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? Verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.” —Matthew 24:1-2

“And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.” —Luke 21:20

From Protestant reformer Martin Luther (The Jews and their Lies, 1543) to Christian Sergius Nilus (Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, 1895) spreading the truth globally about the international Jewish conspiracy, Christians have led the charge into modern times. I doubt very much that the nihilist anti-Judaic could come up with a résumé that would even come close to matching that of Christianity.

Take a look at just some of the prominent names of those brave Christians who have fought the good fight on behalf of Christ and His Kingdom over the last 2,000 years. The following list is by no means comprehensive or in any particular order.

Sergius Nilus
Vicomte Léon de Poncins
Maurice Pinay
John the Baptist
Isaiah the Prophet
Jeremiah the Prophet
The 12 apostles of Christ
Benjamin Freedman
Texe Marrs
Mark Glenn (Charles Giuliani had the audacity to call Glenn a “Zionist” on his show with Revolt of the Plebs last week)
Jesus Christ
Origen
Doug Christie
Fritz Springmeier
Rev. I. B. Pranaitis
Arnold Leese
St. Augustine
St. John Chrysostom
Mel Gibson
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Lady Queenborough Edith Star Miller
James Keegstra
Michael Hoffman II
Flavius Josephus
Ted Pike
Ernst Zundel
Rev. Denis Fahey
H. A. Gwynne
Joseph M. Canfield
Carol Valentine
Elizabeth Dilling
Bobby Fisher
Athanasius
Bishop Richard Williamson
Brother Nathanael Kapner
Mordechai Vanunu
David Duke
Tertullian
James Shaw
Johann Andreas Eisenmenger
Stephen the Martyr
The Russian Tsar
A True Ott

If it weren’t for brave men and women like these, it is doubtful as to whether the anti-Jewish movement would exist today to the degree it does. If it weren’t for men like the above-mentioned, many would still be drinking the Holocaust Kool Aid today, among other flavours. Areligious people, not by any stretch of the imagination, can be credited for the depth of knowledge of world Jewry we have today. Professor Kevin MacDonald would be one exception, off the top of my head; I am sure there are others, but not many. The areligious opportunists like Giuliani know this fact, but they don’t care; they have hijacked this historically Christian movement for their own personal gain—with the only real beneficiaries being the Jews in this case.

Christians aim to help a person eliminate sin from their life—sin, which is at the root of the Jewish problem. Meanwhile, anti-Judaic atheist types attempt to eliminate the Jew only. Do you think sin will disappear with the Jew once he is finally dead and gone? No other group of people will rise up in the Jews’ place? This is as naive thinking as Giuliani levels against Christians. Do you think that no other group of people, other than the Jews, have oppressed humans.

If sin were a tree, Judaism would be its branches. And while anti-Judaic atheists spend all of their time shearing the branches, the Christian is down on the ground with an axe.

Christianity’s diametric opposition to Judaism
Judaism today remains a racist, exclusively tribalistic religion based on superstition, sorcery, witchcraft, subversion, dishonesty, carnality, and whose adherents are obsessed with law. In contrast, Christianity is universal in its outreach and based on love, justice, altruism, spirituality and repentance; although, its adherents don’t always live up to these. We are all human after all. It is true that Christianity came via the Hebrews, but it is not of the Hebrews. It is of God alone. No man may boast, and God is no respecter of men. And because greater Christianity absolutely rejects a Zionist interpretation of scripture, it is not a Zionist religion by any means, despite a small minority of “evangelicals” in the United States of America claiming different. (See John Hagee, Jack Van Impe et al.)

Revolt of the Plebs blogger Keith Johnson, another nihilist type in the truth movement, admits that the Jews had to insert footnotes into the Bible in order to Judaize the Church. But if Christianity is fundamentally Zionist, as Giuliani claims, the Jews should not have needed to create the Scofield Reference Bible in the first place.
Furthermore, if the Old Testament is such a Zionist influence, why then did the Pharisees see the need to create the Talmud and the Kabballah? Shouldn’t have the Old Testament sufficed? Following the Torah, the latter parts (majority of the Old Testament) are full of anti-Judaism, mainly in the writings of the prophets[4], whom the Jews murdered as a result. But Giuliani only ever focuses on the Mosaic books. The rest of the Old Testament doesn’t corroborate his bias interpretation of the Torah. And any Biblical scholar knows that true interpretation is based on other scripture—“Let scripture interpret scripture”, not on man’s thinking. A true rendering of the Torah cannot be obtained without first comparing it with the rest of scripture. Where inconsistencies are found, other places in the Bible clarify them.

While there is a form of nationalism in the Old Testament, what one could misconstrue as Zionism, it was merely a temporal condition and not the original or ultimate purpose of God. National Israel was a foreshadowing of a global people for God. (Foreshadowing is used in many places throughout the Bible, specifically when dealing with prophecy.) And that is where the New Testament comes into play, with its universalistic approach to God’s dealings with His creation.

“Modern orthodoxy is not the religion of the Bible and of the Prophets. It is a post-Biblical or Talmud religion built up by the Pharisees and doctors of the Law between the second and fifth centuries after Jesus Christ, to preserve the small minority of Jews who had not followed Christ, and to consummate the definite break from triumphant Christianity.

“The universalist, messianic, finalist Judaism of the Prophets ended with Jesus, and conquered the world in Christian form.

“Legal national Judaism kept its God exclusively in the community of its choice, which it has striven to protect from the dangers that constantly threaten it. It is based on an interpretation of Biblical texts by oral, not revealed, traditions called Mischna, Gemara, Halaka, and Hagada. This collection, known as the Talmud, was first conceived of in Jerusalem towards the end of the second century and completed in Babylon in the fifth century. The two Talmuds consist of eleven volumes in octavo and are twenty times the size of the Bible.”

(Dr. A. Roudinesco: Le Malheur d’Israel, pp. 114-115)

Renowned researcher Michael Hoffman, who strongly opposes the idea of a “Judeo-Christian” tradition, elaborates:

“There is no fundamental opposition between spirit and matter in Judaism. When Jesus declared in John chapter 6 that ‘the flesh profiteth nothing,’ he was violating the oral tradition of the Pharisees: ‘Rabbinic anthropology differs in this respect from…Christian-anthropology…there is not a fundamental metaphysical opposition between (body and soul)…’ Judaism celebrates the body to such a sordid extent that it even has a defecation prayer which every Talmudic male is commanded to recite every time he relieves himself: ‘Blessed art thou O Lord…who has made the human in its orifices and holes.’ Everything about Orthodox Judaism is either a distortion or falsification of the Old Testament, because it is based on anthropomorphic traditions that void the Old Testament by means of a series of dispensations and loopholes. These begin with the Mishnah, which represents the commitment to writing of the occult legends and lore of those Israelites who had preserved ‘secret knowledge’ which had arisen with the worship of the golden calf, of Molech and similar abominations. With the rejection of their Messiah and the commitment of the formerly oral traditions to writing, these Israelites completely abandoned themselves to a perversion which had once been only a persistent underground stream polluting Israel, but after Christ’s crucifixion, emerged as the main ideology of those who refused to accept Jesus as their savior.

(Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, pp. 145)

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 19, 2012 Anno Domini
Part I | Part II

As the truth movement wises up to the growing number of sheep in wolves’ clothing among them (Zionist shill Alex Jones being among the first to fall hard), it’s only a matter of time before most or all of the shills and frauds that have held back the movement are weeded out.

A small potatoes paytriot gaining prominence in some circles today is Charles Giuliani[i], an over-the-top, charismatic commentator who has joined a host of other so-called patriots on the Oracle Broadcasting Network, which is known for having a mixture of both truthtellers and shills, and has a similar look, feel, and the same core of advertizers and guests as the Republic Broadcasting Network and even the Alex Jones empire in the Genesis Communications Network.  Alan Watt is an example of a shill at RBN while Michael Collins Piper would be an example of a legitimate patriot, just to give you an idea of how truthers and liars seem to co-exist among truth movement mediums.

Giuliani, whose show Truth Hertz runs almost daily at OBN, maintains an anti-Zionist show theme within the context of a nihilist, highly anti-religious worldview. Giuliani and his brigade of typically militant atheist followers claim he is a Biblical scholar (the perfect alibi) who has the authority and knowledge to come to the radical conclusion that Christianity is not only an extension but at the core of the global Jewish conspiracy.

Giuliani suddenly becomes Jew wise
A little bit about how this Giuliani character came to become a show host at OBN. He perhaps first became known in the truth movement on Pal Talk—a popular Internet chat room—under the handle “imilac” and other variations of this name. This all occurred between about 2004 and 2006. (Prior to Pal Talk, he frequented Yahoo chat rooms).
There he typically focused on the 9/11 aspect of the New World Order and based many of his rooms on this.
Personally, I recall bringing up in his rooms the Zionist aspects of the New World Order and was either warned that I could not talk about it, or I was subsequently booted and banned from the room. This is strange behavior from a guy who is so seemingly anti-Zionist today and persistently uses the clichéd charge “elite Jew pigs” dozens and dozens of times throughout any given broadcast of his at OBN. And, of course, Giuliani himself rarely, if ever, brought up Zionism in his early Pal Talk days, much less created a room themed on anti-Zionism. (I believe he is still active on Pal Talk). Perhaps we should give him the benefit of the doubt; perhaps he wasn’t Jew wise then. But that excuse is difficult to accept considering the depth of information Charles would expound upon about the 9\11 attacks. And why proactively censor information linking the Jews?

Giuliani’s nihilist bias and its Jewish associations
One of the most troubling aspect of the Truth Hertz program is its overtly nihilist bias. In the mind of Giuliani and his followers, there is no truth other than that the Jews are oppressing the world. This is highly contradictory and self-defeating, because how can it be absolute that there is a Jewish conspiracy yet everything else is relative or an illusion? I don’t wish to get into a debate about the validity of nihilism or atheism here, but whether it is true or not, listeners of Truth Hertz should know that Giuliani is not presenting value-free information.

Nihilism was vital to the success of the Marxist-Bolshevist (Jewish) takeover of Russia.

“In 1881, the Nihilists murdered Czar Alexander II. Konstantine Petrovitch Pobiedonostsev (also: Constantin Pobedonostzeff), a man of Jewish appearance who won the favor of Alexander III, retaliated with pogroms against the Jews; which, while certainly bad, were exaggerated in the international press… many of the younger Jews participated in the revolutionary movement of the Nihilists, and that the Jews were consequently responsible for the death of the ‘Czar-Emancipator.” (Christopher Jon Bjerknes, The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein, pages 789-790)

Historian E. Michael Jones elaborates on the Judeo-nihilist evolution of pre-revolutionary Russia in The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (2008),

…As “nihilist enlightenment”  conquered the Jewish youth, Russian radicalism put forth its first revolutionary tendrils with the founding of Zemlia I Volia (Land and Freedom) in 1861. Three years later, Nikolai Ishutin and Dmitrii Karakazov created a conspiratorial “Organization,” which was the front for a deeper inner circle known as “Hell,” which took Nihilism to its logical conclusion by first advocating and then engaging in acts of terrorism. ON April 4, 1866, Karakazov decided to turn revolutionary dreams into political realities when he attempted to assasinate Alexander II. (page 650)

Also see Father Seraphim Rose’s Nihilism, The Root of Revolution in the Modern Age.

The Jews admit the importance of nihilism to their revolutionary causes in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Historically, nihilism has had more in common with Talmudic Judaism than with skepticism or logic, contrary to what some may think.

Jewish Kabbalist Mason Albert Pike describes nihilism’s use in the Jews’ Hegelian dialectic:

“We shall unleash the Nihilists and Atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will be from that moment without compass (direction), anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer brought finally out in the public view, a manifestation which will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”[ii]

What lies at the root of Giuliani’s attacks on Christianity?
Giuliani doesn’t simply just reject Christianity—which has been a staple of Jewish opposition for millennia—he goes out of his way to attack it and belittle its adherents. His basis for Christianity being an alleged Jewish plot is based mostly on his personal interpretations of the Levitical laws and Jewish history in the Old Testament. How could a religion like Christianity be legitimate if its core book is based on the behavior of a genocidal war God, he argues, without quantifying the reasons for some of God’s actions in the Old Testament. Instead, he sets up a strawman argument. For example, Giuliani claims Jesus was a Zionist merely because Jesus quoted Isaiah. Giuliani then takes Isaiah out of context in order to strengthen his case that Jesus is supposedly advocating that the nations shall bow at the feet of Israel.[iii] Isaiah is a highly figurative book. When it speaks of Israel, it’s speaking about a spiritual people, not a physical nation.

Giuliani over-simplifies and mischaracterizes the God of the Bible (his infantile conception that God is simply a genocidal, baby-killing enslaver) without considering the context of the scripture. He seems to take almost everything out of context in order to support his dramatic, knee-jerk view. Furthermore, it’s ironic and hypocritical that Giuliani rails against those who have a black-and-white concept of reality (arguably religious people), while at the same time he uses a black-and-white critique of God. He also uses the all-too-cliché Zeitgeist critique of Christianity—that it is merely a regurgitation of ancient pagan religions—and claims the Bible is full of contradictions.[iv]

Giuliani borders on psychoanalyzing Christian and religious people. Psychoanalysis, of course, was an exclusively Jewish movement started by a radical Zionist named Sigmund Freud. Giuliani furthers his assault on Christianity by mischaracterizing the majority of Christianity as being Zionist when, in fact, Christian Zionism is only a minority of the global Ecclesia and a strictly British Commonwealth phenomenon. This brings to mind a Truth Hertz show when Giuliani interviewed veteran patriot Texe Marrs. When Marrs was about to explain his thoughts on the Old Testament specific to Giuliani’s criticism of it, Giuliani conveniently cut him off in an Alex Jones-like fashion. Giuliani often criticizes Christian apologists of using “…Because God said so” circular reasoning. However, this is likely only true in the case of inexperienced or new converts. Giuliani never actually gets into the nuts and bolts of the Bible. Instead, he simply picks and chooses passages upon which to formulate his arguments (isolationist tactics).

In conclusion, I posit that Charles Giuliani is intellectually dishonest at best and an Alex Jones-like shill at worst furthering the Jewish crusade against religion and specifically Christianity.[v] He cannot be trusted, nor can the Genesis-Oracle-Republican broadcasting triad.

Part two deals with Christianity’s contribution to the truth movement and its polar opposition to Judaism

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

Upon inspection of the Alex Jones Wikipedia page history, mathematician Arthur Rubin appears multiple times editing information that puts Alex in a negative or critical light.

Normally, a Jewish person editing a Wikipedia page wouldn’t be out of the ordinary, but in the case of Alex Jones, who has bee under the patriot community microscope for several years and suspected of possibly being a Zionist shill, Rubin’s involvement on Jones’ Wikipedia page is suspicious at the very least.

Interestingly, there are those that claim Jones is a Zionist agent, working for the benefit of Israel. On the other hand, there are those that claim Alex Jones’ anti-New World Order stance is anti-Semitic in nature. The latter would appear to clear Alex Jones of the former. For this reason, any Jewish interest in Alex Jones is of note.

Here are about half a dozen edits by Rubin:

Rubin completely removes the following, which is critical of Jones’ screening and on-air behaviour with callers.
“On his syndicated radio show, Jones is noted for allowing on callers who question his stance on certain topics. However, once Jones allows such callers to utter one or two sentences, he is known for going on a screaming diatribe that often has nothing to do with the substance of the caller’s topic.” –Removed

The following was posted and later removed by Rubin:

“In 1993. After high school he briefly attended [[Austin Community College]] because he couldn’t get into a University.” – Self edited

More removals by Rubin:
“( http://www.truthtellers.org/) He appears on the nationally syndicated radio show, Coast to CoastAM with George Noory” – Removed

The above removal is interesting, considering the fact that the head of truthtellers, Rev. Ted Pike, has now spoken out against Alex Jones. Pike made several appearances on the Alex Jones show and has since called out Alex Jones for being soft on Israel and the Jewish question.

“In late 1999 Jones’ show was accused of fear mongering and spreading [[Y2k]] hysteria. In his show on December 31st, 1999, he claimed that nuclear war was on the horizon, and that nuclear power plant meltdowns, gas and water shortages had been caused by the Y2k bug.(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpHY6nF73-U)” – Removed

“(http://www.infowars.com/media-attempts-to-link-alex-jones-to-pittsburgh-shooter) Michelle Goldberg has stated in ”[[The New Republic]]” that Jones represents “an old strain of American conservatism–isolationist, anti-Wall Street, paranoid about elite conspiracies–that last flowered during the [[John Birch Society]]’s heyday.”
(http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/truther-consequences) – Removed

“In 2007, Jones had an interview with Noam Chomsky on his radio show and disagreed with him on gun violence in United States and England. After Chomsky left the interview, he went on a rant denigrating Chomsky. But what Chomsky said was factually accurate and Jones’s rant was completely baseless though he sounded like he was speaking the truth thus misinforming his audience. Jones’s assertion of gun violence and confiscation of guns in London was not verifiable.” – Removed

In one instance, a reference to prominent alternative thinker David Icke is removed by Rubin when referring to other anti-NWO patriots. Additionally, Rubin removed a reference which referred to Alex Jones as an actor in a long line of occupational descriptions.

What’s more, Alex Jones has had upwards of 19 Jewish advertizers in his vast alternative media empire. His wife is Jewish, his political stance is pro-Israel, and he spends a lot of time entertaining discussions of long-dead Nazis and Germanic Death Cults running a global conspiracy.

According to Rubin’s own Wikipedia page, he earned a PH.d at the California Institute of Technology, and ran for the California State Assembly (55th district) on the Libertarian Party ticket in the early 1980s.