By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 18, 2026 Anno Domini

Mystics who took out an ad in a Portuguese newspaper predicting the 1917 Fatima apparition signed it using the name of an occult society tied to Aleister Crowley.

Stella Matutina (latin for “morning star”) was the credit given to one of the ads that successfully predicted the first apparition of Fatima on May 13, 1917, an apparition that was sold as an appearance by the Virgin Mary, mother of Jesus Christ. It was one of two ads placed by occult groups in Portugal’s Diário de Noticias and Jornal de Noticias, some two months before the event occurred (another mystic group took out ads in other newspapers also predicting the May 13 apparition).

Although the name “morning star” has references to both Jesus and Satan in Christian theology, the occult world uses it to describe enlightenment through a number of different beings or goddesses. Stella Matutina, however, was the name of a Kabbalistic society that succeeded the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (1887-1903), to which belonged British occultist Aleister Crowley, who was once deemed the wickedest man alive, and Crowley’s then secretary Israel Regardie, a Jewish kabbalist who published the Stella Matutina rituals.

Stella Matutina believed that cosmic beings relayed messages to them through the devilish use of trance and automatic writing (spirits direct the author’s pen). A medium calling himself Carlos Calderon, who was allegedly head of one of the Lisbon group of mystics who penned their letter as Stella Matutina, claimed to have channeled a message from cosmic beings (or secret chiefs) using automatic writing and sent it to Diário de Noticias, along with the ads (edition of March 10, 1917). It is not clear whether the newspapers published a facsimile of the automatic written letter; however, accompanying editorials were written by newspaper staff mockingly addressing the prognostications contained in the ads, some of which appeared in the newspaper on the very day of the first apparition, May 13.

Stella Matutina’s allegedly automatic written leader reads,

“It is not thy place to be judges. He who is to judge thee would not favor thy prejudice. Have faith and be patient. It is not our custom to predict the future. The archanes of the future are impenetrable, although, on occasions, God does allow the corner of the veil cloaking it to be slightly displaced. Have confidence in our prophecy. The day 13th of May shall be a day of great joy for all the good spirits of the world [emphasis mine]. Have faith and be good. Ego Sum Charitas (I am Charity). Thou shall always have thy friends at thy side, who will guide thee and help thee on thy work. Ego Sum Charitas. The brilliant light of the Morning Star shall light thy way.”

Crowley was also an automatic writer. He wrote an entire book (The Book of the Law) allegedly channelled to him through a being calling itself Aiwass. At first, Crowley called Aiwass his guardian angel but then later admitted that it was Lucifer. Crowley’s description of another channeled entity of his, “Lam”, bears a striking similarity to what UFO researchers call “grey aliens”.

“I was bound to admit that Aiwass had shown a knowledge of the Cabbala immeasurably superior to my own,” Crowley wrote in his Confessions.

The apparition at Fatima was purported by the children (Lucia, Jacinta, and Francisco) to be approximately three-feet tall—a height that is commonly described by UFO contactees for the grey aliens they allegedly encounter. Incidentally, what is little talked about by the Roman Catholic Church are the contradictory eyewitness descriptions of the so called “miracle of the sun” as a silvery, shiny disc, according to a priest present at the Fatima apparition (flying saucers, or UFOs/UAPs are often described as shiny and disc like). What’s also little mentioned is that Lucia initially believed the Fatima apparition was the devil and only later accepted it as the virgin Mary after it was suggested to her by Church authorities.

Is it possible that the Stella Matutina taking credit for the accurate predictions of the Fatima apparitions is the same one that succeeded Crowley’s Golden Dawn order? It seems highly unlikely that an occult group would use the Latin name in its Catholic context but more likely in its occult context. If true, it tends to lend credence to the possibility that the apparitions at Fatima were not the Blessed Virgin Mary but were some kind of demonic manifestations. Also, if the apparitions at Fatima really were Mary, why would the occult world, which hates Jesus Christ, want to draw attention to something associated with Him? Could Crowley, the wickedest man alive, have somehow opened a portal that invited demonic spirits into the physical realm that culminated in the Fatima apparitions?

For more, see the Fatima skeptic’s index.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

The October Revolution of 1917 was the official commencement of Communism, but the ideological movements leading up to this horrible system were decades, perhaps even centuries, in the making.

Communism should not have come as a huge surprise to most people attuned to world events. The writings of Communist architects Karl Marx and Frederic Engels were widely available and the press had been covering the development of socialist movements in Europe during the latter half of the 19^th century. The Roman Catholic Church even weighed in on the raging debate of competing economic theories with Pope Leo XIII’s encyclical Rerum Novarum in 1891, some 26 years before the bloody revolution of October.

Yet, the apparition known as the Lady of Fatima—believed by many to be the Blessed Virgin Mary, mother of Jesus Christ (even though the apparition never identified itself as Mary but only as “the lady”)—would wait until after Communism had been established before warning the Church and the world.

What good is a warning from “Our Lady of Fatima” about the “errors of Russia” spreading around the world if it wasn’t publicly available until decades after it was allegedly uttered and Communism entrenched in the world? Fatima’s child seer Lucia, who apparently had no experience as an ascetic and whose own mother doubted her claims, didn’t reveal the lady’s warning until after the Second World War—long after Communism had already been well established in Eastern Europe, Asia, and on its way westward. Wouldn’t it have made sense for the warning to come before the advent of Communism or, at the latest, shortly after the October Revolution? At that point, the warning seems to serve only as a reference point to which the prognosticator can boast, “see, I was right”. It doesn’t appear to serve any other purpose. If the Lady’s warning were truly of God, if wouldn’t have been possible for the apparent divine message to have been hindered or delayed by the actions of men, Lucia included. Yet, Lucia did delay this message reaching the world. Does it really matter why? Does it matter if Lucia was possibly replaced by an impostor later in her life? No. None of that matters. The warning became of no use by the time it was revealed. By that time, the trajectory of international Communism was visible to all, especially to those in the West. What a waste of a good apparition to tell the world of something it could already easily predict on its own. Furthermore, Lenin and Stalin had been open about their plans for world Communism. The apparition’s delayed warning was no spoiler.

Another suspicious aspect of the apparition’s warning is its failure to have also called for the consecration of Red China—the second, equally dangerous pillar of Communist power in the world. The apparition called on only Russia to be consecrated in order to bring world peace. Evidently, the apparition would have us believe that with Russia out of the way, Red China, the Fabian socialists in the West, and the socialists of the Middle East would have surrendered their Communism and a Communist-free utopia would have ensued. Of course, this is all assuming that consecrations by men of the Church, the Pope are guaranteed to work. I suppose free will doesn’t come into play at all. The Fatimists would have us believe that consecration is a guarantee, regardless of the consent and intentions of the to-be consecrated. It’s like some magical formula where the participants (Russia) merely serve as instruments of the magic.

The apparition’s warning that the “errors of Russia” would spread unless the nation was consecrated to her is peculiar. Firstly, I want to point out that the Fatima apparition made a conditional prophecy (do what I say and no bad stuff will happen) that is incompatible with Holy Scripture, specifically St. John’s Apocalypse, which warns of an unconditional apostasy (bad stuff inevitable, sorry). Secondly, if we take the apparition’s meaning of “errors” to mean Communism, which I think most accept as the most logical meaning, then why did the apparition follow it up with “of Russia” when Imperial Russia had been enveloped by the Soviet monolith known as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR-CCCP)? Fatimists may dismiss this as semantical, but why should we expect inaccuracy from God? Has God not been absolutely accurate through His prophets? For example, God’s prophets warned us of the prerequisites for the coming of the Messiah using the Seventy Weeks prophecy (from the Book of Daniel), which God allotted exactly 490 years with which to rebuild Jerusalem in preparation for the Messiah. I could offer a defense of the apparition’s choice of words by arguing that Imperial Russia had been heavily infiltrated by Freemasonry and the occult and, therefore; Communism was only one in a list of errors dating centuries back in Russia’s thousand-year history. However, officially, Imperial Rome was a Christian nation, although of the Eastern Orthodox strain. One could respond that Eastern Orthodoxy was yet another one of these Russian “errors”, but Eastern Orthodoxy was not exclusive to Russia. The official seat of Eastern Orthodoxy has been in Constantinople and remains there to this day. Eastern Orthodoxy did not originate in Russia and cannot be labelled a Russia error. What are we to make of the apparition’s choice of words? Is Lucia’s recollection of the lady’s words even accurate? Memory tends to fade over time and Jactina died as a child, so she is not available to corroborate Lucia’s testimony, and Jacinta’s brother (who also died as a young child) couldn’t even hear the apparition but only see it.

Fatimists will defend their position by arguing that the only reason the lady of Fatima has not brought in her era of peace (a narrative with millenarianist tendencies) is because no pope has yet consecrated Russia to the lady’s immaculate heart. But this is false. Four popes—Pius XII, Paul VI, John Paul II, and most recently, Francis—have all consecrated Russia to Mary in some form or another. Yet, “Russia’s errors” have not abated and Communism is taking over more and more of the globe day by day. Fatimists will then move the goalposts and argue that those popes weren’t specific enough in their consecrations, and that’s why Communism hasn’t been stopped. I guess Pius XII’s, “we consecrate all the peoples of Russia to the same Immaculate Heart” is not specific enough for them. When that excuse fails, Fatimists will often appeal to a form of sedevacantism (the belief that the Catholic Church has been or is currently without a valid pope) to explain why the popes’ consecrations were invalid or why the current self-professed pope won’t consecrate Russia. It’s an anti-pope plot, they say, to hinder “our Lady”. Many of these Fatimists are not sedevacantists technically speaking (although most actual sedevacantists seem to be ardent proponents of Fatima), but the Fatimists will temporarily endorse it merely to defend the Fatima narrative. The reason Fatimists move the goalposts and abandon their own ecclesiology is because their objective isn’t truth. Their objective is to defend the Fatima narrative, truth be damned. Most sedevacantists agree that Pius XII was a valid pope, so the Fatimist rejection of his consecration of Russia doesn’t really hold water. They are forced to admit that the consecrations did nothing to stop Communism and the lady of Fatima is a false prophetess (obviously not the Blessed Virgin Mary).

There are some Fatimists, yet, who believe that Pope John Paul II legitimately consecrated Russia or at least came close to, and they credit him for the (fake) collapse of Communism in 1991 (some even seem to credit Pius XII’s consecration for the death of Stalin). This is probably the most dangerous position, because this kind of Fatimist is under the delusion that Soviet Communism fell and that, consequently, Russia is about to convert to Catholicism and is evinced by its so called turn to Christianity and national conservatism (neither of which is actually true). If Russia is to lead the world into the anti-Christ, one-world Communist system, like it appears they will do, without God’s grace, these Fatimists will be duped.

]]> https://fitzinfo.net/2025/12/05/fatima-apparitions-errors-of-russia-narrative-full-of-holes/feed/ 4 20521 https://fitzinfo.net/2025/01/20/astronomer-jacques-vallee-shows-the-similarities-between-the-events-at-fatima-and-ufo-contact/ https://fitzinfo.net/2025/01/20/astronomer-jacques-vallee-shows-the-similarities-between-the-events-at-fatima-and-ufo-contact/#respond Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:25:05 +0000 https://fitzinfo.net/?p=18785 By Jacques Vallée
April 1988
Excerpt from Dimensions: A Casebook of Alien Contact

(Editor’s note: while Vallée is not Catholic, I believe his insights are more objective than the wishes of many well meaning but naive Catholics. It appears that UFOs and so called space aliens are nothing more than demonic manifestations or fallen angels, and it seems plausible that the Fatima apparitions may well have been deceptive manifestations. Although Vallée does not endorse it, the fallen angel theory of the origin of UFOs and ETs seems most probable and is compatible with Church teaching on demons (see The Malleus Malificarum).—Timothy Fitzpatrick)

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Feb. 23, 2022 Anno Domini
Book Review

“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema” ‑Galatians 1, 8

The Lady of Fatima and the Anti-Christ—The Fatima narrative in the light of Catholic truth (2018) is a book that will no doubt anger many Catholics, but if the book has any truth, as the Latin maxim says, “Let justice be done though the heavens should fall.” Some angels, along with Satan, did fall from the heavens and posed as the Virgin Mary at Fatima, Portugal in 1917 as part of a strategic apocalyptic setup—this is the theme of Bernal Diaz’s book.

He attempts to penetrate the official Vatican narrative of the so called apparition of the Virgin Mary (“Our Lady of Fatima”) at Fatima from multiple angles, including through the credibility of the primary witnesses (three young children); the contradictions in the apparitions’ messages and manifestations with traditional Catholic dogma; inconsistencies with the apparitions’ identities and behaviour; the similarities between physical phenomena at Fatima and demonic encounters; and the subversive effects from the cult of Fatima resulting in leading its members into paganism, Islam, and accepting a Crimean-based anti-Christ. (I’ve used apparitions in the plural form because we don’t know that it has been only one apparition to have appeared at Fatima multiple times. It could be multiple entities posing as the same person multiple times).

The latter angle may seem like a bit of a stretch as it pertains to Islam, especially for readers of Fitzinfo.net, but if one considers Islam as a subset of Jewish-Masonic world Noahidism, the author’s conclusions can work from, say, the Catholic worldview presented by Monsignor George F. Dillon in Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked (1885) or a similar one presented by La Civilta Cattolica in On the Jewish Question In Europe (1890). It seems that the Catholic Church has warned its flock more of the dangers of subversive Jewish behaviour than it has of Islamic. After all, it’s the “perfidious Jews” for whose salvation we ought to pray more so than the Islamic infidels, it seems. The passage of time has show Islam as the Jewish lackey that it is.

“Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years we were in exile…. And now, Europe is losing its identity in favour of another people and another religion…. Even if we are in a major war with the region’s Arabs over the Land of Israel, Islam is still much better as a gentile culture than Christianity.” —Rabbi Baruch Efrati, 2012

To his credit, Diaz does touch on the Jewish-Islam partnership in the last chapter.

Nonetheless, Islam could play a larger role in the anti-Christ deception than we might imagine, as Diaz suggests. Perhaps it could be that Jewry loses control over Islam, and it takes on a bloody, revolutionary life of its own, like it has done many times in history. Furthermore, it’s becoming apparent that Judaism is nothing but repackaged ancient paganism with a special focus on racial identity. If Islam is a creation of Judaism, like many clerics believe, then all the more does it accomodate a push for revived paganism under the anti-Christ in the end days. If the devil chose “Our Lady of Fatima” to spread a false gospel—human and goddess co-redemption—because of its association with Mohammad’s daughter Fatimah and to facilitate the grotesque union of Catholicism with Islam, perhaps it explains why some Fatimists are so pro-Islam. According to these Islamophiles, like with the Judeophiles, Muslims are part of God’s plan of salvation. That’s quite an absurd conclusion, but it seems to be spreading among even so called traditional Catholics (E. Michael Jones anyone?). According to Diaz, it may be that Mary’s immaculate conception was hijacked and applied to Mohammad’s daughter Fatimah through the demon(s) posing as “our lady” at Fatima, Portugal as some sort of twisted mockery and blasphemy, and to blur the line between Catholicism and Islam. Fatimah is portrayed as a sinless goddess figure in the Islamic Quran.

“Satan appeared as Fatimah, the daughter of Mohamet, and called himself “Our lady of the Rosary” while others have given him the name “Our Lady of Fatima.” This last title implies a lady that is derived from Fatima. In other words, Satan came as the lady Fatima!”

A warning to readers who are already offended by the subject of this book but might be reading this review out of curiosity: the author makes even more controversy by taking sedevacantism (vacancy of the Holy See) back beyond it’s common starting year of 1958 to 1878, when the supposed last valid Pope, Pius IX, died. As extreme as this may sound, it’s a notion not entirely new in our time. Michael Hoffman’s 2017 book The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome seems to suggest that the last valid pope was some time before the Medicis took over the papacy. But the reader should not let this dissuade them from reading this book, as it largely deals with the technical and spiritual problems with the cult of Fatima. Diaz fully references his sources—all 301 of them. It’s worth reading, even if you believe Fatima was authentic. I found it difficult to put the book down.

Diaz draws an interesting conclusion from the name of one of the key players in the Fatima narrative, Fatima’s child witness Jacinta, which he sees as a providential clue as to the origins of the apparitions (Jacinta is Portuguese for Hyacinth).

“Saint Hyacinth cut the pagan ‘sacred’ oak tree down. Some accounts say there were visible demons that left the tree. In any case, given the satanic nature of the apparitions at Fatima, it isn’t difficult to understand the symbolic nature of this girl being named after the saint who cut the “great oak” tree down. The tree the “lady” of Fatima appeared on was yet another oak tree. One of the children was named after Saint Hyacinth who fell the first tree. It was left to Jacinta to “fell” the tree of these Satanic apparitions. Jacinta failed in this task. It is now the turn of each individual soul to comprehend and help others see and understand the evil nature of these apparitions.”

Phenomena associated with classic demonic encounters that was present at the Fatima apparitions includes buzzing sounds (that of a bee or fly); lightning, clouds, glowing globes, chilling of the air, and negative physiological and/or psychological effects in humans.

“Beelzebub is the god of flies and of course he is a devil. Buzzing is the sound they heard at the apparitions,” writes Diaz. “Not the Virgin Mary, not ‘UFOS.’ Islam’s false prophet had a similar experience….”

As the Fatima apparition came down to the Earth like lightning, so, too, does Satan:

“And the seventy-two returned with joy, saying: Lord, the devils also are subject to us in thy name. And he said to them: I saw Satan like lightning falling from heaven.” (Luke 10:17-18)

These are just some of the many disturbing revelations discussed in the book.

The biggest red flag seems to be the out-of-character display by the Fatima apparition supposedly posing as Mary. Mary has not and never would elevate herself above her Son, as she seems to do at Fatima. Everything else comes unglued from there, as Diaz demonstrates.

“The teachings of Antipope Pius X about the Virgin Mary being Co-Redemptrix was in preparation for the loathing false teachings coming from Fatima that turns the honest seeker of Mary’s intercession into an act of repugnant adoration of a false goddess.”

Here’s a final pair of quotes from the book that relates to the Soviet-Israel, perestroika-deception focus of Fitzinfo.net:

“It is very possible that the beast of Fatima will react to a “consecration” from the antipope by pointing to a man in Crimea/Russia as the answer to world peace either then or in the future.”

…

“Based on the book of Daniel, Bishop Wamesley believes the Antichrist will come from ‘Crim Tartary,’ the modern day Crimea, which was annexed from the Ukraine and joined with Russia on March 18, 2014. This may be the case since the demon of Fatima directed our attention to Russia. To this very day the followers of the Fatima lie are anxiously watching Russia and waiting for the “consecration” so we may see her ‘conversion’.”

Crimea happens to be part of the region that was the old Jewish kingdom of Khazaria—the middlemen between the Eastern Orthodox kingdom of Bynzantium and Kievan-Rus “Third Rome” in the north.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Jan. 22, 2019 Anno Domini

There are major theological and geopolitical inconsistencies presented by the alleged prophetic Marian apparition at Fatima in the early 20th century.

The much-touted apparition, which seems to be accepted as authentic by the Vatican and is highly touted in the traditional Catholic movement, tends towards not only private interpretation but also millenarianism (an earthly kingdom)—both of which are anathema to both Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy.

Before I go on, let me first point out that I am a convert to Eastern Orthodoxy, so I have no dog in this fight when I say that the Fatima prophecies are actually anti-Catholic. Furthermore, my eschatological position is that of the majority of the Church Fathers, which is a post- or amillennial view based in some type of Preterism, perhaps partial Preterism. This is important to note, because the Fatima prophecies tend towards a futurist and even pre-millennial view—inconsistent with the majority view of the Fathers. In fact, Fatima’s eschatology is more consistent with Protestantism and millennarianist philo-Semitism, perhaps similar to that of the Puritans and Hussites, for example. Millenarianism is a sort of Earthly messianic expectation in the spirit of racially supremacist Jews.

The timing of Fatima is very suspicious—the same year of Lenin’s anti-Christ October Revolution in Russia (1917) and Europe. But more on that later.

Russia’s false conversion, false consecration
The major red flag with the prophecies is its prediction that the Russian empire will come back to the Catholic faith in the near future. First, it presupposes a continuation of Christ’s millennial reign on Earth (One thousand years of the Church’s rule, be it through Rome or Byzantium), even though it is clearly already at an end.  Second, it requires that Russia will either completely abandon Eastern Orthodoxy or modify Eastern Orthodoxy to fit in with Roman Catholicsm (and vice versa)—the latter of which is currently happening through ecumenism. Last but not least, Russia’s current perceived shift to the Right seems to corroborate the Fatima’ prophecy of the consecration of Russia. Why, Russia could only be consecrated if it finally abandoned its Godless communism, and that supposedly happened in the 1990s. In reality, Russia is merely feigning a turn to the Right as part of its old Leninist strategy of leading its opposition, namely conservatives/Christians/nationalists, into a trap.  To lure them into this trap, the Soviets must pretend to be like their opponents. Russia is still communist, although it is a much more developed and chameleonic collectivism, which is spreading to each corner of the world. Therefore, Fatima could not be fulfilled by a fake consecration.

Russia to heal Great Schism, create world religion?

During the Revolution, a big part of the Leninist strategy was to infiltrate and control not only the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) at home but also the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) abroad. The former was achieved in 1918 with the ousting of St. Tikhon, the latter achieved with the communist Judeo-masonic subversion of the Vatican no later than the 1960s, culminating in the anti-Christ Second Vatican Council.
However, the communists learned that since “the gates of hell will not prevail” against Christ’s Church (they couldn’t eradicate altogether Christianity from the hearts of all of the Russian people), they would have to infiltrate it, instead of trying to destroy it. With both Churches already under Soviet, Cultural Marxist control by the end of the 1960s, the next step in the Soviet plan was to unite the two Churches—something I imagine we will eventually see soon. What’s more, it appears the following step in this Soviet plan involves creating a world religion (this is consistent with New Age-Jewish messianism/millennarianism), likely to be based in Jerusalem, home to Jewish, Christian, and Muslim shrines. Today, Russia is home to large amounts of devotees to all three faiths, and has been promoting multiculturalism and inter-faith dialogue since the Revolution began. Russia is still very much a philo-Semitic, philo-Islamic nation. Russia has the largest Muslim population in all of Europe and is still run by mainly Jewish oligarchs and mobsters. Unfortunately, it seems that the great majority of Christians in Russia identify as such out of tradition and nationalism, not so much out of sincere belief. While the Church may appear to be growing in Russia, it is a shallow, false revival based in a revived National Bolshevism. Indeed, true Russian Orthodox authorities warned their flocks that the Soviets would, in the future, build grand churches with which to deceive the masses.

Fatima’s carnal message
Instead of looking to Christ’s superior, spiritual Kingdom, which is here with us now, these sincere yet misguided traditional Catholics take seriously this Fatima consecration of Russia and look to a future Earthly kingdom where Russia and, presumably, the world are consecrated to the RCC and peace is brought in.

“In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me, and she shall be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world,” reads the end of the so-called second secret of Fatima.

Wow! That’s a rather convenient narrative if your Vladimir Lenin in 1917 looking for a way to fool the Catholic world (the majority in Christendom in terms of numbers) into accepting that Russia’s chameleonic communism is a return to God. Theologically speaking, Fatima’s message is outright Protestantism. True Catholicism has never been millenarianist, nor has it given credence to such fantastical privately interpreted visions. This alleged message from the Holy Mother suggests a restoration of the Church on Earth, despite that the Book of Revelation says basically the opposite would happen following Christ’s one thousand-year reign on Earth (the Church age).

It seems to say that following the Church Age, Satan would be unleashed for a short time to deceive the world, leading to a great apostasy before the final judgment. We appear to be in this phase right now. So instead of some imagined revival, we can only expect to slide further and further into apostasy before the final judgment.
Revelation carries a harsh warning to anyone who would add or take away even one word from the Holy Scriptures. Does Fatima violate this? It appears so. Fatimists are so dedicated to the Fatima message, they seem to hold it on the same level of authority as the Scriptures and Tradition.

The geopolitical inconsistency with Fatima is perhaps even more pronounced. Today, the world is on a terrible and colossal slide into full-fledged apostasy. The momentum is such that it’s hard to believe any God-fearing person could honestly think that a turning point were right around the corner. This fatal error is likely also responsible for the seemingly traditional Catholic support for Putinist Russia and its crypto-Soviet expansion and destruction of Western Civilization. Tainted with the pro-Russian sentiment inherent in the Fatima prophecy, traditional Catholics can only view world events from a pro-Russia view. Thus, if and when Russia and its current Eurasianist agenda succeed in overthrowing the West and the entire world, are tradcats going to believe this will be Christ’s rule on Earth, the time of peace Fatima said it would be? Are they being set up to accept the anti-Christ world religon? We have countless Soviet defectors corroborating the narrative that the Soviets feigned the collapse of communism and are feigning a return to Christianity and conservatism.

Hijacked Vatican brought Fatima’s message to the world
Tradcats also need to realize that it was the Judeo-masonic, communist-infiltrated post-Vatican-II-occupied Holy See that brought these alleged secrets of Fatima to the world. If the secrets were authentic, one would think that anti-Christ Vatican II church would go to any length to suppress these secrets. The logic just doesn’t follow.

There is controversy over whether the third secret was fully disclosed by the Vatican (in the year 2000), and all kinds of speculation surrounds what the complete secret says, one of which is that it spoke of the RCC being infiltrated and becoming the throne of anti-Christ. Well, if this is true, we don’t really need this missing part of the third secret, because it is already very obvious that the RCC, and much of Eastern Orthodoxy, have been hijacked by anti-Christs. Again, Revelation warned that instead of a revival of the Church, she would go into apostasy leading up to the final judgment. Furthermore, the Holy Scriptures seem to suggest that before the final judgment, there would remain only a remnant of the true Church. These revelations appear to be coming true right before our very eyes, as in both Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, there are only remnants staying true to the faith and tradition. In the RCC, we have tradcats, sedevacantists, etc. In Eastern Orthodoxy, we have the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad (ROCA) and individual parishes throughout the Eparchy staying true to tradition. But none of these, unfortunately, make up the majority of the Churches today. They are mere remnants.

Now, if Fatima is indeed a communist ruse to fool tradcats, where does it lead? It can only lead to a re-unified Church, where there is a pseudo healing of the Great Schism between the RCC and Eastern Orthodoxy.
Interestingly in Eastern Orthodoxy, some remnant believers and Saints have already warned that the Bolsheviks would one day appear to restore Russian Orthodoxy and rebuild these magnificent churches but that it would all be for show. Indeed, we now know that Leninist and Stalinist strategy involved giving concessions to the ROC. In fact, after the death of St. Tikhon—the last true Patriarch of the ROC, the Bolsheviks put in one of their own as the head of the ROC. This line of succession of impostor patriarchs continues to this day, with “Patriarch” Kirill. Kirill and Pope Francis appear to be on great terms and could be planning a re-unification soon. Eastern Orthodoxy, especially in the ROC, has its own kind of Fatima message. They, like the Fatimists, believe there will be a great revival of Christianity in Russia, despite warnings from the Bible and Remnant believers to the contrary.

There you have it. The heads of both the RCC and ROC are in the hands of the anti-Christ system. There is no sign of any kind of revival or restoration of Russia to either the Sacred Heart of Mary or to even traditional and true Eastern Orthodoxy.