By Ryan Augustine

Most people have the misconception about Clive Staple Lewis that he was a just children’s author who penned the Narnia series. While he did write that excellent series, the perception that he was just another young adult writer is as fantastical as those books. C.S. Lewis was one of the greatest intellectuals to come out of Britain in the last 100 years. He was an Oxford Don who is considered in his field to be the one of the greatest, if not the greatest medievalist scholar of all time. In addition to his university work, Lewis was an atheist convert who was converted and became a devout Anglican and penned some of the greatest Christian apologetic works. His mission, as he grew into the role of a lay theologian, was to communicate the highly intellectual Christian truth for the average reader. As such, his books have a very clear and flowing style. C.S. Lewis’ ability to write about very complex and intellectual things in a clear and simple to understand way is a mark of one who has complete mastery over the subject. Lewis was also a great debater, the president of the Socratic Club, and avid anti-Communist. There are stories of him coming to the debate hall and the socialist speakers leaving rather than face him. As such, Lewis was an intellectual force to be reckoned with. His connections and academic career provided him with the framework to make keen observations which he presents to us in his work That Hideous Strength.

That Hideous Strength, or THS for short, is a dystopian science fiction and fantasy novel which is the final book in Lewis’ Space Trilogy. It is similar to, and more accurate than, Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and George Orwell’s 1984 in that it describes how a one-world dystopian government is brought about and rules. Though THS is a science fantasy, it is written as grounded in the real world so that when the reader looks past the fantasy, he sees the thoughts of Lewis, the Oxford Don, on the nature of a one-world dystopia. Thus, this review will not focus on the fantasy elements of the story but on Lewis’ thoughts about how a one-world dystopic future would unfold.

The plot of THS follows two people: Jane, the wife of Mark Studdock, and Mark Studdock, a young progressive professor at Bracton College who is selected to join the National Institute of Coordinated Experiments, NICE for short (an apt C.S. Lewis Pun on the nature of socialism, as will be shown). The book starts with Mark’s recruitment into the NICE (The NICE is later revealed to be a non-governmental organization with immense international power) by showing the inner workings of the college’s progressive element, which is full of manipulative, cutthroat, and dishonest people who have a deep conviction that their sliminess is a virtue for achieving the greater good of a new social order. One cannot help but think that C.S. Lewis is inserting his own experience as an academic working with these people into the book. Mark is recruited into the NICE by these people promising Mark that the NICE is where the real work of creating a progressive society is taking place, A society of the kabbalistic Adam Kadmon:

“Man has got to take charge of man. That means, remember, that some men have got to take charge of the rest—which is another reason for cashing in on it as soon as one can. You and I want to be the people who do the taking charge, not the ones who are taken charge of. Quite.” (Lord Feverstone)

“What sort of things have you in mind?” (Mark)

“Quite simple and obvious things, at first—sterilization of the unfit, liquidation of backward races (we don’t want any dead weights), selective breeding. Then the real education, including pre-natal education. By real education, I mean one that has no ‘take-it-or-leave-it’ nonsense. A real education makes the patient what it wants infallibly: whatever he or his parents try to do about it. Of course, it’ll have to be mainly psychological at first. But we’ll get on to the biochemical conditioning in the end and direct manipulation of the brain. . .” (Lord Feverstone)

“But this is stupendous, Feverstone.”

“It’s the real thing at last. A new type of man: and it’s people like you who’ve got to begin to make him.”

“That’s my trouble. Don’t think it’s false modesty, but I haven’t yet seen how I can contribute.”

“No, but we have. You are what we need: a trained sociologist with a radically realistic outlook, not afraid of responsibility. Also, a sociologist who can write.”

“You don’t mean you want me to write up all this?”

“No. We want you to write it down—to camouflage it.”

In the above passage Lewis’ shows us all the core elements of what a Communist dystopia is: The craving of weak men for absolute power, technocracy, racial dysgenics, human experimentation, creation of the new man as a slave without free will, how progressives will leap at the opportunity to be evil and stroke their ego’s that they are good people, and of course, lying and propaganda, which has always been an integral part of the Communist plan. Lewis even had the foresight to predict Elon’s brain chips here.

Once Mark arrives at the NICE, he is kept in the dark about what he is supposed to do, and he is manipulated along in a process of initiation within its secret circles. Mark quickly finds himself out of favor with the NICE after he tries to find out any concrete details about what it is that they do. The NICE is revealed to be an NGO which is a highly secretive society that operates as a compartmentalized organization. Its members are told what to do at informal social gatherings and are directed by innuendos, intrigue, plots, and counter plots. Circles within circles and layers within layers. In this portrayal of the NICE, Lewis’ accurately describes how Left wing and secret societies function and operate. Finally, after some time at the institute, Mark is given a real task where he is to manipulate the popular opinion through controlled opposition and usher in a power grab by the NICE which uses a false flag event.

“I’ve no notion of spending my life writing newspaper articles,” he said. “And if I had, I’d want to know a good deal more about the politics of the N.I.C.E. before I went in for that sort of thing.”

“Haven’t you been told that it’s strictly non-political?”

I’ve been told so many things that I don’t know whether I’m on my head or my heels,” said Mark. “But I don’t see how one’s going to start with a newspaper stunt (which is about what this comes to) without being political. Is it Left or Right papers that are going to print all this rot about Alcasan?”

“Both, honey, both,” said Miss Hardcastle. “Don’t you understand anything?” Isn’t it absolutely essential to keep a fierce Left and a fierce Right, both on their toes and each terrified of the other? That’s how we get things done. Any opposition to the N.I.C.E. is represented as a Left racket in the Right papers and a Right racket in the Left papers. If it’s properly done, you get each side outbidding the other in support of us to refute the enemy slanders. Of course we’re non-political. The real power always is.”

“I don’t believe you can do that,” said Mark. “Not with the papers that are read by educated people.”

“That shows you are still in the nursery, lovey,” said Miss Hardcastle. “Haven’t you yet realized that it is the other way round?”

“How do you mean?”

“Why you fool, it’s the educated reader who can be gulled. All our difficulty comes with the others. When did you meet a workman who believes the papers? He takes it for granted that they’re all propaganda and skips the leading articles. He buys his paper for the football results and the little paragraphs about girls falling out of windows and corpses found in Mayfair flats. He is our problem. We have to recondition him. But the educated public, the people who read the highbrow weeklies, don’t need reconditioning. They’re all right already. They’ll believe anything.”

“And all the stuff must be all ready to appear in the papers the very day after the riot,” said Miss Hardcastle. “That means it must be handed in to the D.D. by six tomorrow morning, at latest.”

“But how are we to write it tonight if the thing doesn’t even happen til tomorrow at the earliest?”

Everyone burst out laughing.

“You’ll never manage publicity that way, Mark” said Feverstone. “You surely don’t need to wait for a thing to happen before you tell the story of it!”

Interestingly, in the above passages we glean the gem that it is the educated class that is brainwashed. It reminds us of the great Covid scam where people were fiercely arguing over the different biological mechanisms of the spike protein, whether or not it was a bioweapon, vaccines vs. Ivermectin, all the while oblivious to the fact the thing didn’t even exist. Meanwhile the real work of the communist NGO’s, like the fictitious NICE, was advanced.

As Mark initiation progresses, he comes into contact with several characters who are archetypes of various progressive elements. First is the Deputy Director Whither, a verbose man who speaks a lot of nonsensical jargon. Whither is the leader of the NICE and he rules the organization through innuendo and subterfuge, never allowing himself to be pinned down by any definitive statement. In such a way do we see how progressive organizations are modeled in the real world. They spam out a lot of nonsense words which if one reads it closely, he may find whatever it is that confirms his viewpoint. Yet, the real meaning of what is being communicated is always the same: Communism. There is a striking similarity between how Whither speaks and the modernist language of the Second Vatican Council. Furthermore, as a note in Whither, we see the personification of the liberal “NPC” type a man who is not really there and only functions as a sort of ghost, spewing out what he has, through years of indoctrination, been programmed to believe.

There is professor Filistrano, who is a grotesquely overweight biochemical genius. Yet, Filostrano only views life as mechanical, and his work is dedicated to simplifying life until it at last becomes sterile. He performs ghastly experiments without thought of the pain and suffering which they produce. In him, we see progressive scientism which seeks to reduce living to a mechanized technocratic grey existence.

Reverend Straik is a man who is high up in the NICE organization and believes that in every man is God. That our mission, like Christ, is to become God Himself. A new man who will evolve and transcend into Godhood. He is a figure whom C.S. Lewis does a very good job of accurately portraying, as the New Age movement teaches, yet at the same time making it sound as ridiculous as it is.

Fairy Hardcastle is the chief of the institute’s police, who is of course a lesbian. How Lewis had the foresight to predict lesbians would oversee the police in 1945 England is beyond me, but he did.

Finally, Dr. Frost is a man who is at the very top of the NICE. He is the only other person besides the Whither who is a full initiate. As Whither is effusive, blathering, and stretched out, Frost is the polar opposite. He is sharpened to a point and utterly logical and reductionist to the point that that his logic has become deeply flawed. Dr. Frost represents the aspect of Communism which seeks to eradicate all beauty from the world. In one of the more climactic scenes, Frost takes Mark into the “objectivity room” where he is surrounded by paintings that have distorted proportions and are intentionally ugly and confusing. This room has been designed by Frost to destroy the concept of normal and good in people and there is a religious theme to the paintings that is distinctly anti-Christian. In Frost we see a man who as the physical description of an elder Trotsky and a characterization of Adorno, Freud, and Marcuse.

Mark: Well, if so, what is there objective about stamping on the face? Isn’t it just as subjective to spit on a thing like this as to worship it? I mean—Damn it all if it’s only a bit of wood, why do anything about it?”

Frost: “That is superficial. If you had been brought up in a non-Christian society, you would not be asked to do this. Of course, it is a superstition; but it is that particular superstition which has been pressed upon our society for a great any centuries. It can be experimentally shown that it still forms a dominant system in the subconscious of many individuals whose conscious thought appears to be wholly liberated. An explicit action in the reverse direction is, therefor,e a necessary step towards complete objectivity. It is not a question for a priori discussion. We find it in practice that it cannot be dispensed with.”

Theodore Adorno, Negative Dialectics: (The point of social theory is to) “Demonstrate the disjointedness, the untruth, of totality.”

Marcuse: “The truth of art lies in its power to break the monopoly of established reality to define what is real.”

“The work of art, must at its breaking point, expose the ultimate nakedness of man’s (and nature’s) existence, stripped of all the paraphernalia of monopolistic mass culture, completely and utterly alone, in the abyss of destruction, despair and freedom. The most revolutionary work of art will be, at the same time, the most esoteric, the most anti-collectivist one, for the goal of the revolution is the free individual.”  Herbert Marcuse, Art and Liberation

Ironically, we see in the portrayal of Frost that this line of revolutionary reasoning is contradictory because in both he and Whither they lost their humanity and become will-less creatures. Thus, by destroying everything in a search for objectivity, or transcendence (the revolution in Marcuse’s case), they have destroyed the object i.e. the person, which the revolution is for.

Eventually, it is revealed to Mark that the Institute is actually being directed by what the NICE calls Macrobes: advanced alien beings who have transcended physical reality and exist on a higher plane of reality than humans do. These Macrobes represent the key to unlocking man’s, really the initiates of the institute’s, power to transcend and become immaterial. The NICE recognizes that they are not necessarily good, in the classical sense, but that is because they offer power—that is what makes the act of following them good.

Frost: “that is pure Chimera. The great majority of the human race can be educated only in the sense of being given knowledge: they cannot be trained into the total objectivity of the mind which is now necessary. They will always remain animals, looking at the world through the haze of their subjective reactions. Even if they could, the day for a large population has passed. It has served its function by acting as a kind of cocoon for the Technocratic and Objective Man. Now, the macrobes, and the selected humans who can co-operate with them, have no further use for it.”

Following this revelation it becomes clear that the macrobes are in fact the driving power behind the NICE, coordinating and guiding all the members. The subtle influence of the macrobes is what gives the members the surety they need to make their increasingly bizarre and contradictory statements. They are the glue which holds the organization together and without which it would fall apart. Eventually, at the end of the book it is revealed to Mark that the Macrobes are in fact demons. All the mechinisms of the Institute, which has become a global power over governments, are in fact controlled through its members by demonic forces.

Of the whole book, this is the keenest insight that international Communism is united against the West by supernatural forces. This force transcends their ranks and gives them their purpose and malice towards all things which are good. It is the guiding power behind all their works. It is what binds the liberal and the progressive to their insane and wicked beliefs; without the spiritual element, their beliefs would become tribal and fall apart under their own absurdities. The demonic force, its subtle influence, is truly the all-seeing eye which rests atop the mystery pyramid of iniquity.

It would be unfortunate if we did not cover the other half of the book, which deals with the antithesis of the NICE. This is Jane’s story, which this article will not delve too deeply into only to touch upon a few key points. In comparison to NICE, the organization that Jane becomes involved in is strictly hierarchical, there are no secrets, and everyone knows their place and duties. Yet, while it seems contradictory, it is a very free organization where its members have the right to freely say and do what they wan,t unlike the NICE which is very democratic, yet tyrannical and secretive.

In the final chapter, Lewis goes at length to describe what can only be described as the spirit of the country. Each country has a good national spirit, a bad national spirit, and the zeitgeist of the real country is caught in the middle between the two. He describes this in his book as Logres (the good mythical Arthurian kingdom), Britain, and England.

“What is a haunting?” asked Camilla.

“How something we may call Britain is always haunted by something we may call Logres. Haven’t you noticed that we are two countries? After every Arthus, a Mordred; behind every Milton, a Cromwell: a nation of poets, a nation of shopkeepers: the home of Sidney-and of Cecil Rhodes. Is it any wonder they call us hypocrites? But what they mistake for hypocrisy is really the struggle between Logres and Britain.”

Here Lewis makes the observation that when the Left criticizes our countries for the past evils we have done, they are critiquing our nations for the evil which on the most fundamental level is the very philosophy of Leftism. He then follows up on this observation later in the conversation by writing:

“You see, MacPhee, if one is thinking simply of goodness in the abstract, one soon reaches the fatal idea of something standardized—some common kind of life to which all nations ought to progress. Of course, there are universal rules to which all goodness must conform. But that’s only the grammar of virtue. It’s not there that the sap is. He doesn’t make two blades of grass the same: how much less two saints, two nations, two angels. The whole work of healing Tellus (earth) depends on nursing that little spark, on incarnating that ghost, which is still alive in every real people, and different in each. When Logres really dominates Britain, when the goddess Reason, the divine clearness, is really enthroned in France, when the order of Heaven is really followed in China-why, then it will be spring.”

And I think that is a good place to end this essay.

By Yaroslav Lisovolik
April 15, 2022 Anno Domini
Translated from Russian

In the context of an unprecedented growth of geopolitical risks in the world, there is a growing awareness that the old architecture of the world order is being replaced by a new configuration of international relations and regional blocs. One of the most important driving forces of this kind of transformation of the world economy is the countries of the global South, which create their own institutions, regional integration associations and financial settlement systems. Among the leaders of these processes are the largest emerging markets, primarily the BRICS countries. So, in March 2022, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said:

“The BRICS countries, which make up almost half of the world’s population and a significant part of world GDP, will be one of the backbones of the new emerging world order.”

In order for BRICS to become the basis for a new world order, this bloc must offer other countries of the world economy new paradigms for the development of a global scale. Such areas in the new world economic architecture may include the restart of globalization based on a new platform of countries and regions, the creation of a new institutional system for the modernization of the countries of the world economy, the creation of a new pool of reserve currencies from emerging markets, the creation of an alternative track to the Western format for the development of the world economy, the creation new regional blocs and platforms for their coordination and development.

Almost all of these possible paradigms of a global scale can be implemented within the broad BRICS+ format, which opens up various options for the BRICS countries to interact with the rest of the world economy. The BRICS+ format, initiated by China in 2017, still has to get its tangible contours of development in many respects, although some possible models for cooperation within its framework have already been announced by representatives of the BRICS countries. China’s BRICS Presidency in 2022 creates a favorable basis for the development of the BRICS+ format, while Chinese representatives have already stated that they are considering the development of the BRICS+ concept in the context of interaction, including regional integration associations of the countries of the global South.

From the point of view of practical implementation, one of the most accessible formats for BRICS+ is the union of three all-continental regional associations, including the African Union, CELAC (an association of Latin American countries), and the SCO/SCO+ in Eurasia. This kind of alliance provides maximum coverage for the countries of the global South, which does not require deep and complex economic integration or harmonization of economic interaction formats on all three continents. The expanded format provides an opportunity to coordinate interaction for developing countries in the international arena in the field of promoting the priorities of the global South agenda in the field of sustainable development.

This year, relatively favorable conditions are emerging for the formation of such an expanded circle of interaction between developing countries: in Latin America, within the framework of the CELAC association, Argentina presides, which has recently stepped up steps to establish interaction with BRICS. The suspension of Brazil’s participation in CELAC in 2020 seems to be a deterrent in the Latin American direction, but this factor is likely to be temporary. The SCO in 2022 is chaired by Uzbekistan, a country that is actively involved in the integration processes in Eurasia after a period of closedness. Senegal takes over AU chairmanship in 2022 , which promotes issues of coordination and cooperation of regional integration associations, and also significantly increases interaction with the BRICS countries, primarily with China .

The second track within the framework of BRICS+ can be a platform for interaction between regional integration blocs, in which the BRICS countries participate. This kind of platform may include the priority regional integration projects of the BRICS countries – MERCOSUR, the South African Customs Union, BIMSTEK, the EAEU, as well as the RCEP or the Free Trade Area of ​​China and ASEAN. All these regional blocs can cooperate in a coordinated manner towards the harmonization of standards and a more open economic space for trade and investment by the BRICS countries and their regional partners. It is important to note that at this stage, most of the countries of the association form their foreign trade policy precisely in the format of regional integration blocs (RF-EAEU, Brazil-MERCOSUR, South Africa – SACU).

When creating such platforms, the spirit of multilateralism and the construction of a new architecture in the interests of the entire expanded format of the global South is important. Attempts to form BRICS+ on the basis of exclusively narrow national interests may adversely affect the prospects for the development of the BRICS+ initiative itself and other multilateral initiatives of the BRICS countries. For BRICS+ as a new format of interaction between the BRICS countries, the key to success lies in the multimodality of various formats of interaction within the framework of BRICS+, which can take into account the entire range of national interests and priorities of the BRICS countries and their regional partners.

Thus, within the framework of the BRICS+ format, two tracks of interaction between the countries of the global South can be formed:

1. The SCO + AU + SELAC format is the most inclusive and focused on the broad interaction of developing countries in international organizations. This kind of format may to a greater extent reflect the vision of China, announced back in 2017 by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who announced BRICS+ as the largest platform for interaction for developing countries.
2. A platform for the “integration of integrations” of regional economic groupings, in which the leaders are the BRICS countries. This format largely reflects the Russian BRICS+ development concept announced by Sergey Ryabkov at the beginning of 2018: “We invite our partners to consider the BRICS+ format as a development platform for what could be called ‘integration of integrations’.”

If the Chinese BRICS+ format is a kind of maximum coverage of the global South in breadth, then for the Russian BRICS+ format, the depth and harmonization of the integration of priority regional projects of the BRICS countries becomes more important.

In general, the number of tracks and formats of interaction between developing countries can be much larger and reflect the globalization vision of each member of the BRICS bloc. In other words, the BRICS+ platform can be the basis for the divergence of models and platforms for development and economic integration, in contrast to the unipolar/“mono-model” approach of the integration processes of developed countries. In this regard, for the development of the BRICS+ format within this kind of divergence of development patterns, it is important that India, Brazil and South Africa also present their vision of the BRICS+ concept, as well as globalization within the global South and beyond. It is possible that for India,

Activation of the role of BRICS in the international arena can also occur through the improvement of the mechanism of functioning of the Pool of Conditional Foreign Exchange Reserves (CUVR) of the BRICS. In the last few years, the BRICS RWR has stepped up coordination with other regional financial institutions (RFIs) through regular IMF consultations with regional financial facilities. At the same time, the activity of the BRICS PWR has been significantly lower in response to the crisis in the BRICS countries in recent years compared to the BRICS NDBs. Within the framework of the BRICS+ mechanism, it would be possible to consider the possibility of strengthening the mandate of the BRICS IWR to monitor the macroeconomic situation in the BRICS countries, to develop coordinated anti-crisis measures, as well as to interact with the BRICS IWR with other RFIs of developing countries and regional partners of the BRICS countries. In particular, it would be possible to form a regular mechanism for coordinating the BRICS IWRP with the Eurasian Fund for Stabilization and Development (EFSD), the Chiang Mai Initiative of the ASEAN countries and their regional partners (CMIM), as well as the Latin American RFO FLAR. Another direction could be the expansion of membership in the BRICS IWR by including regional partners of the BRICS countries, including a number of countries that have received membership in the BRICS NDB.

The prospects for the transformation of the world economy are largely related to the coordination of actions between the largest countries of the global South, primarily between the BRICS countries. However, for a truly global restart of the development of the world economy, a more expanded format of BRICS + interaction is needed, which will allow other countries of the developing world to be involved in this process. In this case, the reformatting of the global economy will become truly inclusive and sustainable. An important tool for scaling up the transformation of the world economy can be the format of “integration of integrations” within the framework of cooperation between regional integration blocs of the countries of the global South. China’s BRICS Presidency in 2022 can give an additional impetus to the processes of building platforms for interaction between regional groupings of developing countries.

This kind of BRICS progress towards creating platforms for cooperation between regional integration associations of developing countries can become the basis for the formation of a common platform for cooperation among all countries of the global South. This expanded platform could contribute to the growth of the inclusive development and openness of the countries of the global South, their greater dynamism, the structuring of integration associations, filling the vacuum and “white spots” on the map of the integration processes of the developing world. So far, we have to state that developed countries are much more provided with dynamic and structured integration associations compared to the countries of the global South.

Yaroslav Lisovolik , Doctor of Economics, Program Director of the Valdai International Discussion Club, RIAC Member

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
September 8, 2015 Anno Domini

Leaked documents showing Alex Jones’ divorce settlement with his Jewish wife Kelly (Violet) Rebecca Jones have been circulating on the web for a couple of days now, yet Jones has decided to publicly ignore it, perhaps as a means of perpetuating his good-Christian-patriot persona as he continues his HASBARA/COINTELPRO operation.

The documents, first revealed by Aaron Wilson of AlexJonesCritic.com, show that the couple, after almost seven years of marriage, officially divorced on March 23 of this year after Kelly’s initial filing with the 428th Judicial District Court of Hays County all the way back on December 18 of 2013. As part of the settlement, Jones was ordered to pay Kelly a $3.1 million, as well as the deed to their Back of the Moon Drive, Austin, Texas estate, valued at just under $1 million. Divorces typically involve a 50/50 split of the assets between couples, so it’s very possible that Jones may be worth close to $8 million, assuming he has no other hidden assets. With Jones now apparently out of the house, it appears Jones is living at the Ashton apartments overlooking the Colorado River in Austin, Texas. Jones has done several broadcasts from a high-rise building resembling the Ashton building. The document in the “settlement” link above lists Jones’ address as 101 Colorado Street in Austin, which appears to confirm that it is the high-rise Ashton building.

Jones alleged to have had affair with Infowars employee

Alleged federal whistleblower Stew Webb alleges that the divorce was caused by an affair between Jones and an unnamed Infowars employee. Although Webb does not name the employee, he states that it is a female, based on his source within the Infowars operation.

I will not name this woman out of respect for her privacy. Everybody on the Infowars team knew about the affair, states Webb

Rumours are swirling that the employee is undoubtedly Infowars reporter Lee Ann McAdoo, a big-busted young woman who many believe was hired by Jones merely for sex appeal. Jones, being the intelligent PR man that he is, knows that sex sells.

Jones must protect his image
In order for Jones to salvage what’s left of the control he has over NWO dissent, he must protect his image and that of his Jewish wife, which explains his complete silence over the issue. As far as Jones’ listeners are concerned, Jones is a good Christian patriot and a hero. To think of Jones as an adultering pig with multiple ties to the Jewish lobby would devastate the trust he has built up with his audience over his 20-year on-air operation.

Conspiracy researcher and Protestant preacher Texe Marrs claims to have married Alex and Kelly. The irony of this divorce is heightened by the fact that Marrs has gone out of his way multiple times to vouch for Jones as the upstanding Christian patriot he presents himself as. Marrs has done this despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. It’s strange, because Marrs, unlike Jones, tells the truth about Jewish power. He, of all people, should be able to spot a Zionist shill with great ease.

Jones misappropriating funds from his Infowars operation?
Is Jones using the proceeds from Infowars campaigns like his infamous “money bomb” to pay for his divorce settlement? Blogger Glenn Canady comes to a very likely conclusion:

This is only a story because Alex Jones continues to keep his huge divorce settlement a secret and is taking money from patriots which could now be going to the ex-wife and not to the fight against the new world order as he claims.  Alex needs to come clean on this divorce and admit that nearly $4 million of his money from his fans is going to the ex-wife now.
…
Alex Jones is doing a 24 hour money bomb on Sept. 16 to raise $1 million from his fans.  But since Alex Jones has kept his $4-million divorce a secret from his fans, how much of this money bomb will instead end up in the hands of his ex wife now?

You can’t put anything past Jones. There is no law that I know of that could stop him from misappropriating the money his naive fans donate to him.

HASBARA must go on
As well, nothing can interrupt Jones’ objective as an Israeli/Jewish HASBARA shill, especially following the defeat Jones conceded to one David Duke in a recent on-air debate. The debate proved so devastating that even Jones’ supporters walked away in disgust with Jones’ behaviour, coupled with the contradictory evidence Duke presented to Jones’ typical pro-Jewish narrative. Towards the end of the debate, Jones tried to save face, after realizing how bad he came off, by having his Jewish crewman Rob Jacobson attack Duke.

It appears that Kelly was the brains behind the Infowars operation, herself being a publicity hound for PETA at one time. Being Jewish just adds to the image of her as a Jewish revolutionary, with Jones as the parrot, whoring for Zionism every day on the microphone. But with this divorce, what direction will Jones and Infowars take? Was Kelly his Zionist handler? Perhaps his 34 Jewish advertizers, Jewish staffers, and apparent Stratfor connections will be enough to keep the engine running.

The Duke defeat as well as this divorce leak could be the final nail in the coffin of the Infowars operation. What credibility will Jones have left?

Libido Dominandi
If Jones’ alleged affair is true, what are the chances that this isn’t the first time Jones has let his passions rule him into a compromising situation? Could this, then, be the primary method by which Jones’ Jewish handlers direct him? Libido Dominandi is unequivocally the primary method the establishment uses to control and socially engineer people. For an exhaustive explanation of this form of control, I recommend historian E. Michael Jones’ most excellent book of the same title.

Above all, Alex Jones is human. His audience needs to unlearn the god-like image they have of him.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

Television personality Montel Williams seems to believe that conspiracy icon Alex Jones is a cokehead and con artist, even calling him out on it publicly via Twitter earlier this year.

Perhaps Williams’ coke claim isn’t so far fetched when you consider Jones’ superhuman confidence and energy levels, self-grandiosity, feelings of superiority and narcissism, cokehead friends like Charlie Sheen, and his patriot-funded millions in the bank (see: Cocaine, anatomy of a high and How Narcicissm relates to Cocaine Addiction).
And if he is a CIA/Mossad asset and a crony of wealthy elites, as this author believes, he would have ample access to the white stuff. It certainly wouldn’t be a shock if it turned out he were a cokehead.

Jones also appears to be jacked up on another Koch—powerful billionaires Charles de Ganahl Koch and David Hamilton Koch, who represent the Koch family empire of industrial capitalism. The Kochs are more or less the Rockefellers of the 21^st century, with their tentacles virtually everywhere, but especially in the realm of the neoconservative-libertarian mix. While not overtly Zionist, or even Jewish (nobody seems to know), the Kochs are a credit to predatory Judeo-masonic usury, also known as capitalism. Daddy Koch—Fred Chase—happened to found the crypto-Jewish “conservative” society of John Birch, of which Alex Jones appears to be a solid member (see Did the CIA recruit Alex Jones through the John Birch Society?). The Kochs are also behind the Tea Party and Libertarian movements in the United States, even throwing their support behind Jones cronies Rand and Ron Paul, and all helped by the promotion of controlled opposition news aggregates like the Jewish homosexual Matthew Drudge (DrudgeReport) and Zionist Joseph Farrah (WorldNetDaily).

Jones’ real agenda seems to have reared its trollish head more and more over the last few years, and perhaps it is because of the upcoming federal election in the United States, whether it’s outright endorsing neocon Zionists like Sarah Palin, rallying against raising the minimum wage, or touting the Koch’s Keystone XL pipeline as the saviour of the economy. Now that Jones has built up the core of his audience to its maximum potential, he can really let loose with his agenda, which directly lines up with the Koch agenda (the Koch agenda is a key fixture on the right of the kabbalist dialectic of seeming opposites. To show how flimsy Koch politics is, consider that the Koch empire helped set up the Soviet Unions oil industry under the watch of Stalin even though the Kochs have always been outspokenly anti-Communist. They have also gone both ways in the gay marriage debate as well as the abortion debate). Jones admits now that he is a “classical liberal” who advocates laissez-faire capitalism. The researched reader will know that laissez-faire is a product of the Judeo-masonic Enlightenment. Jones is as close to neo-conservatism as one can get (it also falls under the umbrella of masonic libertarianism). The Kochs are also for laissez-faire capitalism, as it allows them to conduct their exploitative practices, unfettered by government or anyone else.

Koch and Jones’ political views line up perfectly
Here’s some perspective on the similarities between what Alex Jones preaches daily through his media empire and the Koch Brothers’ agenda:

• Minimum wage freeze
• Anti-union
• Tea Party (Alex Jones claims to have founded Tea Party movement, so do Kochs—Kochs actually founded it: Study Confirms Tea Party Was Created by Big Tobacco and Billionaire Koch Brothers)
• Smaller government
• Laissez-faire capitalism
• Support Israel and neoconservative foreign policies despite being “libertarian” (anti-war)
• Stand with coal
• Support Keystone XL pipeline and conventional oil and gas development
• John Birch Society (Fred Koch a founding member of JBS)
• Libertarianism (David H. Koch was the Libertarian Party’s vice-presidential candidate in 1980; Kochs funded $250 million to libertarian causes from 1998 to 2008; Alex Jones is an outspoken Libertarian)
• Oppose socialized health care
• Oppose carbon tax schemes
• Oppose official narrative on climate change
• Attack renewable energy
• Anti-tax, especially for the rich
• Privatization of government services
• Ron Paul/Rand Paul (Koch Brothers Support Rand Paul)
• The Cato Institute (Ron Paul at the Cato Institute)
• Oppose net neutrality (Alex Jones’ Stance On Net Neutrality Proves He Is A Shill)
• Anti-police (Kochs have advocated criminal justice reform through Cato and The Charles Koch Institute; Alex Jones constantly fear mongers about the police state, even naming some of his documentaries “Police State”)
• Advocate restoration of U.S. Constitution (which is masonic)
• Monetary Reform, specifically a return to the gold standard

See now why Jones nor the alternative media rarely, if ever, talk about the Koch brothers, much less in a critical manner? The Kochs hide their money and influence in a complex web of political action committees (PACs) and tax-exempt foundations. Seems Jones has learned a trick or two from the Kochs, as he has done a good job of hiding his own funding through various incorporated dummy companies.

Koch brothers libertarianism, like JBS, serve to homogenize NWO dissenters and the so called right wing
In How the Money Power created Libertarianism and Austrian Economics, monetary reformer and anti-usurist Anthony Migchels draws some interesting conclusions about Koch involvement in the truth movement:

But in the meantime another very wealthy Jewish family, the Koch family (see ‘the Zionist Billionaires that Control Politics’), had taken over the organization of Libertarianism and Austrian Economics.

Fred Koch founded the John Birch Society in 1958. Ed Griffin was educated there. He later wrote a famous book, “The Creature of Jekyll Island”. This was a rehash of Eustace Mullins’ brilliant ‘Secrets of the Federal Reserve’, with one exception: it left out all Mullins’ analysis of the Gold Standard as a Banker operation and how Britain’s demand for taxes paid in Gold were the cause of the war of Independence. Instead it called for the reinstatement of a Gold Standard. This is a key part of the story OF how Austrian Economics managed to take over the ‘Truth Movement’.

Koch’s son Charles Koch founded the CATO Institute, together with Murray Rothbard. The CATO Institute remains to this day a leading Libertarian outlet.

Of course, Jones frequently references Griffin (also a JBS member) and dabbled in the gold trade himself (apparently he has moved on to just selling herbal supplements and water filters).

Infowars’ talent pool a who’s who of controlled opposition
In retrospect, Jones pool of “experts” used in his documentary films and on his daily radio show all seem to come from only a few groups, either from the John Birch Society, Koch-connected groups, the intelligence community, or Zionist groups like the Council For National Policy, the Remnant Saints Inter-Continental Congress, and WorldNetDaily. Here’s a short list of some of the Infowars go-to characters from these groups:

• G. Edward Griffin
• Joseph Farrah
• Joel Skousen (nephew of Bircher Cleon Skousen, a former FBI official and Mormon apologist)
• Phyllis Schlafly
• Matt Drudge
• Stanley Monteith
• Lew Rockwell
• Ron Paul
• Dan Bongino
• Jesse Benton

Jones is an honorary founding member of the Remnant Saints Inter-Continental Congress, a seemingly Christian Zionist, Birch-like think tank styled like a Koch PAC.

Why does Adnan Khashoggi keep popping up around Alex Jones?
Regular readers know that I have been onto Alex Jones’ disinfo trail for some time. One of the first big articles I wrote exposing Jones, with much credit to Daniel Hopsicker, revealed a possible connection of Jones to Israeli intelligence through Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi, who is as big as anybody in The Octopus—a moniker for the Judeo-Masonic criminal network, especially as it was revealed in the 1980s with arms scandals and BCCI. Like many Saudi elites, Khashoggi is an Israeli Mossad asset. (See: The Growing Complexity of Alex Jones’ Israeli Connections). There is yet another possible connection between the two characters, this time through our hosts of the evening, the Kochs.

In Triad, Khashoggi, and the Republicans: Together Again, we discover:

Triad Management, the company directed by the Koch Brothers, is one of hundreds of Triad companies run by global magnate Khashoggi. Incidentally this is the Khashoggi who was responsible for heading the Iran Contra arms for hostages deal for which he was later pardoned by senior George Bush. In 1983, the year Triad Governmental Systems was founded in Ohio, Khashoggi formed the gold company Barrick Gold Corp. In 1985, Khashoggi borrowed $21 million, using his Barrick stock as collateral, for the covert transfer of arms to Iran for the Bush-North group.

Khashoggi allegedly provided the loan from his Cayman Islands company, Triad American holding company. Khashoggi used the Monte Carlo offices of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) to launder money for Iran arms sales. After Khashoggi was investigated and indicted for his role in the Iran-Contra affair, the Canadian director of Barrick, Peter Munk, paid the $4 million to get Adnan bailed out.

I wonder if Alex Jones’ old-time listeners who bought gold from him back in his goldsmithing heyday are currently storing a quickly devaluing metal that was supplied by Khashoggi’s Barick Gold! Guess who has Barrick Gold in his top ten holdings? One Ron Paul.
The Kochs also happen to be subscribers to Israeli intelligence firm Stratfor, based in Austin, Texas. We suspect Jones is in cahoots with Stratfor—Stratfor being in cahoots with Khashoggi.

Line between Jones and Fox News fading into oblivion
If Jones is following the Koch agenda as a subplot within the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy, it explains his recent endorsement of Tea Partier Sarah Palin, which is odd considering his previous attacks on her, and his outrageous claim that all Muslims be deported from the United States or that Israeli proxy ISIS is a legitimate threat to America as far as it is perceived as Islamic. Furthermore, we can anticipate, as we inch closer to the election, that Jones will ramp up the Koch-neocon rhetoric. The strategy at first seemed to be the advocacy for the Libertarian ticket in Rand Paul, but Plan B may be to go with the Republican ticket in Jeb Bush. Alternatively, it’s difficult to see the Kochs opposing a Trump Whitehouse, should the impossible happen.

Jones has been criticizing President Obama and the Democrats hard in the last four years in the run up to Obama’s exit. Now that Jones’ core audience has been hooked by Jones exposing legitimate but fairly general conspiracies, they are struggling to see how they are being duped with his current rhetoric, which protects the Jewish money power that runs the show. Since his beginning as a conspiracy icon, Jones has played the right wing card of the Kabbalist dialectic of the NWO conspiracy. He has consistently advocated JBS-, Koch-styled political views as part of his counter-intelligence mission. His mission has been to homogenize, radicalize, and then misdirect dissenters of the NWO conspiracy. One of the key tactics he uses to achieve this is to dilute resistance by keeping his listeners from focusing on specific things. Instead, he has them looking in all directions, exerting, thus wasting their energy away from anything meaningful. It’s diabolical scheme to manage the NWO’s opposition to a predetermined outcome, thus we call Alex Jones and other shills in the patriot movement “controlled opposition.”
Jewish Soviet dictator Vladimir Lenin once said:

The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.

Life must be pretty good for Alex Jones.

He’s raking in millions, living large within the protective barrier of his CIA/Zionist handlers, and fooling millions of people with his sophisticated fake persona using psychological trickery and word magic.

His largely lower class audience haven’t the educated means with which to figure out the con. They are at the mercy of a heavily funded psychological operation, with an intelligent millionaire as the window dressing. His audience gets poorer and poorer with the doom and gloom Jones sells them as he himself gets fatter (literally) and richer.

One of the many rewards Jones has received for his establishment shilling is his Dogwood Creek home, which is safely located in a gated community in Austin, Texas . It is now valued at over $1 million, dwarfing the shanty his average listener rents or squats in. One source lists Jones’ home at $1,039,947. Jones also recently opened up another fancy, new studio, supposedly all with the funding of his meager PrisonPlanet TV subscriptions and the proceeds from his Infowars store, which consists of disinformation material and unverified health products. Late last year, Jones claimed to have invested $70-90 million into the Infowars group of companies. By the way, these companies, shown below, are registered through Jones’ Jewish, Bronfman-connected attorney Elizabeth M. Schurig. Other apparent shell companies, like Magnolia Management LLC and I Am That Girl, are listed here.

How Jones can come up with this kind of capital all on his own is as puzzling as his supposed Dogwood roommates and his Jewish neighbours.

Alex Jones’ Dogwood ‘tenants’
CorporationWiki lists three other questionable characters at Jones 6601 Dogwood Creek Drive address. They are deposed Texas state attorney Jack Stick, sports broadcaster Greg Swindell, and now defunct Jill Beckett Cochran Inc. When cross-referencing these characters with Wikileaks, only Jack Stick’s former employer, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission turns up. It appears the Commission’s Duane Pietsch was in contact with Stratfor on a personal level. Here is one example. Why these people are listed at Jones’ residence is strange.
Perhaps they are being listed at this address through attorney Schurig, or perhaps Jones is in kahoots with them.

Alex Jones’ Jewish neighbours
Another to add to the growing list of Jews connected to Alex Jones is his physical neighbours. Several have seemingly Jewish surnames, including Robert Feiner, Scott Snyder, Cheryl Shapiro. Is Jones and his Jewish wife Kelly more comfortable around such neighbours, or is it just a coincidence, as Texas has a disproportionately large population of Jews?

With Alex Jones’ allegiance now clearly belonging to the Zionist-occupied United States intelligence community and not to the patriot community, it’s interesting to speculate at which point and how he was recruited to the CIA and what drew him to an organization that would eventually lead him to committing treason against the American people.

Jones officially started his CIA Operation Mockingbird, FBI COINTELPRO operation (the two programs work in tandem as part of the U.S. government), Infowars, in Austin, Texas in 1996, the same year Israeli intelligence established it’s front Stratfor, also in Austin, Texas.
But it’s unlikely that Jones was recruited to the CIA that same year, as counter intelligence operatives require extensive training and programming before they become active field agents or assets.

Is he CIA…or is he a Zionist shill? Make up your mind!
I should point out at this point that Jones’ shilling for the Jewish lobby appears to be via the CIA, not the other way around. Keep in mind that the CIA is subservient to Israel and its intelligence apparatus. There are many blogs and videos claiming that Jones is only CIA. This is only half of the truth. One should imagine the CIA as a paid contractor of the Israeli Mossad. CIA operatives then work for the State of Israel with the façade of being American and loyal to America’s interests. To answer the question of exactly what kind of shill Alex Jones is, the answer then is that he is both a Zionist and CIA shill, with the CIA likely being his paymaster. Of course, one, some, or all of his dozens of Jewish advertizers[1] on his Infowars program could be tied to Israeli intelligence and/or the CIA as well, so they would also be financing the Infowars COINTELPRO operation, but indirectly. Jones claims he has invested over $70 million into the Infowars empire. I guess he doesn’t expect his gullible followers to question whether a supposed grassroots radio host could come up with this kind of capital.

Jones’ early life
As is typical with most intelligence operatives, little is known about Alex Jones’ childhood and the years leading up to 1996. His Wikipedia entry for his early life is only a paragraph long. He claims to have been born in Dallas, Texas in 1974, after which point he appears to have been moved around quite a bit with his parents, culminating in a stint at Austin Community College, before he would go on to become the popular radio host he is today. He claims to have become familiar with conspiracies at a young age, being influenced by his father, a dentist and member of the John Birch Society (JBS), who retained books like None Dare Call it Conspiracy in his library. This book was published by the society and is basically required reading for Birchers. How true the following admission by Jones in Jewish-owned Rolling Stone magazine[2] is remains unclear, but perhaps we can glean some understanding of his upbringing.

“My parents were careful not to give me political views almost as an experiment to see what I’d turn into,” he says. “The closest thing to a childhood political training was some neighbors who were members of the John Birch Society. They’d come over for dinner and I’d be exposed to those ideas, starting at around age two.”[3]

The most enduring influence, though, was a 1971 bestseller he found on his father’s bookshelf: None Dare Call It Conspiracy. Authored by Gary Allen, a spokesman for the John Birch Society, the book provided the cornerstone for New World Order conspiracies. According to None Dare, the federal income tax is nothing but a plot by a cabal of mega rich “insiders” who work to suck the middle class dry and transfer its wealth to the Ford and Rockefeller foundations. As a teenager, Jones read the book twice. “It’s still the easiest-to-read primer to the New World Order,” he says.
Jones claims that his affinity to conspiracies was rooted in his experience with corrupt Rockwall cops, who once arrested him while driving without a license and in possession of a six-pack of beer. Oddly, this incident supposedly provoked his father to move his family and his dental practice to Austin, Texas.

“They brought me to jail,” Jones says. “Afterward, one of the cops told me to wise up, or they’d frame me and send me away.” The following week, his father was so spooked that he sold his dental practice and moved the family to Austin. A few months later, Rockwall County’s sheriff was indicted on organized-crime charges.

“The Rockwall cops were lowbrow thugs, and Alex was a hell-raiser,” says Buckley Hamman, a cousin who grew up with Jones. “The conflict with the cops started Alex down the road of his current pursuit.”

Jones apparently began to fall under the influence of Judeo-Masonic Enlightenment thinkers like Edward Gibbon, whose books may have been available to Jones through his father’s library or perhaps through the family’s Bircher friends. Jones’ Enlightenment influence is consistent with his current unwavering support of the Masonic U.S. Constitution (and Ron Paul) and the overwhelmingly Masonic U.S. Founding Fathers. Jones is the quintessential WASP elitist. Of course, the JBS is a strong advocate of Judeo-Masonic republicanism, Ron Paul, the Masonic U.S. Constitution, and so-called free-market capitalism.

Jones admits his family “did stuff for the CIA.” What’s more, he says that in the 1980s, the CIA attempted to recruit his father with a salary of $400,000 annually for a “four-year secreteur” (sic). He goes on to say that his father has performed dental work on “high-level CIA people.” (Source)

Alex Jones’ early message centered on Birch themes involving the United Nations, CFR, and the Federal Reserve
After establishing himself on radio and with his website, Jones consistently spread New World Order conspiracy theories centered around a unified plot carried out by the United Nations, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the U.S. Federal Reserve. This line is straight from the rhetoric put out by the JBS. One notable instance of Jones parroting the JBS line was during a public speech given by then-Texas governor George W. Bush.[4] Jones interrupted the soon-to-be U.S. President and accused him of being in league with the Federal Reserve and the CFR. In what could well have been a staged incident, authorities then handcuffed Jones before the cameras stopped rolling. Of course, he was eventually let go, presumably without incident. On his radio program, Jones constantly ranted and raved about the United Nations takeover of America, a specifically JBS theme. The JBS states that one of its “most immediate objectives…is to get the United States out of the United Nations and the United Nations out of the United States.” It even produced a documentary, The UN Deception, in 2001[5]. An old video from the 1990s surfaced on Youtube within the last few years showing Alex Jones fingering the UN as being part of a plot to oppress Jews in Israel.[6]

Most interestingly, Jones confesses to supporting the state of Israel, in defiance of the UN, despite the fact that the UN helped Israel become the illegal state it is today. It’s difficult to accept the Birch Society’s anti-Federal Reserve claims when one of its founding members, William J. Grede, served as director of the Federal Reserve Bank’s Seventh District from 1947 to 1961.[7] Grede also served several years on the UN-connected Rockefeller national council for the YMCA.[8] The Birch Society, nor Alex Jones, never attacks the core problem at the heart of the Federal Reserve, which is usury, carried out by a cabal of exclusively Jewish international banksters. The JBS’s hypocrisy is almost the same with the CFR. Early Birch Society member Spruille Braden, an American diplomat, was a member of the CFR. Braden was a paid lobbyist for the United Fruit Company, which was used by the CIA to force regime change in Nicaragua in 1954.[9] That Bircher Thomas Coleman Andrews was commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service in the 1950s doesn’t help the Society’s credibility that it is truly anti-tax either.[10] Jones is also outspokenly anti-tax and pro free-market capitalism. The seemingly anti-communist JBS also never attacks the driving force behind communism, which is clearly the Jewish revolutionary movement. Other JBS rhetoric often rehashed by Jones includes the notion of fluoridated water as a plot to make us all docile. In my observations of Jones, when he is under criticism, instead of addressing the points, he will automatically fall back on his foundational JBS rhetoric, including the fluoride and vaccine conspiracies. While there is a fluoride and vaccine conspiracy, it seems JBS and Jones are using these issues to legitimize their platforms so that they can deceive readers on other issues. Older readers may remember that the JBS was strongly anti-JFK during the former President’s short term in office. The JBS was remembered for distributing close to 5,000 flyers accusing JFK of committing treason while serving as President, in the days leading up to the assassination. Jones has gone out of his way to suppress the Israeli Mossad orchestration of this crime.[11] Of course, the Society and Jones have not been so anti-JFK in recent years, as it has become more obvious that there was a conspiracy to kill JFK, and to say otherwise would tarnish their image as being anti-conspiracy.

The John Birch Society as a Judeo-Masonic-CIA front
JBS, like CIA front National Review, was established in 1958, at the height of the CIA’s psychological warfare research and development phase and during the CIA’s creation of its Operation Mockingbird program, which would pave the way for the CIA to use the media for covert domestic and international psychological warfare. John Birch himself worked for U.S. intelligence through the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). And like National Review, which was dominated by Jews at the top[12], it appears the JBS’ function is to homogenize the conservative movement and, eventually, the conspiracy community, into one manageable controlled opponent.[13]

Conspiracy researcher Eustace Mullins wrote in his 1988 book Murder By Injection that the JBS was created by the WASP elitist Rockefeller family as controlled opposition to the conspiracy it purportedly was set up to resist.

The Rockefellers were also active on the ‘right wing’ front through their sponsorship of the John Birch Society. To enable Robert Welch, a 32nd degree Mason, to devote all of his time to the Society, Nelson Rockefeller purchased his family firm, the Welch Candy Company, from him at a handsome price. Welch chose the principal officers of the Society from his acquaintances at the Council on Foreign Relations. For years afterwards, American patriots were puzzled by the consistent inability of the John Birch Society to move forward on any of its well-advertised ‘anti-Communist’ goals. The fact that the Society had been set up at the behest of the backers of the world Communist revolution may have played some role in this development. Other patriots wondered why most American conservative writers, including the present writer, were steadily blacklisted by the Society for some thirty years. Despite thousands of requests from would-be book buyers, the Society refused to review or list any of my books. After several decades of futility, the Society was totally discredited by its own record.[14]

Similarly, many of Jones’ critics reach the same conclusion that Mullins reaches about JBS—Jones’ inability to move forward on any of his purported goals of thwarting the New World Order conspiracy. Whether or not the Rockefeller dynasty is Jewish, they have worked hand in hand with the Jewish money power and the Zionist revolutionary movement. Late Zionist researcher John “Birdman” Bryant brought to the conspiracy community’s attention disturbing revelations from a book by late disillusioned Bircher founder Professor Revilo P. Oliver, which implicates what he calls the “B’nai Birch[15]” with Jews and the CIA-controlled right. Bryant writes,

In 1966, Prof Revilo Oliver (now deceased), who was co-founder (with eleven others) of the Birch Society and Associate Editor of its major organ, American Opinion, discovered that Robert Welch, the JBS’s principal founder, was controlled by Jews, the purpose of said control being to harmlessly absorb and deflect the energy and money of patriotic Americans who wished to fight the ‘international communist conspiracy’, while leaving unmolested the Jewish-led conspiracy against America and Western civilization. In 1981 Oliver published America’s Decline: The Education of a Conservative, in which he told the story of his discovery.[16]

I myself and many of Alex Jones’ critics have leveled the same charge against Alex Jones as Professor Oliver levels against Welch and JBS.
Oliver writes,

I was not astonished, although I was pained, by the discovery that Welch was merely the nominal head of the Birch business, which he operated under the supervision of a committee of Jews, while Jews also controlled the flow, through various bank accounts, of the funds that were needed to supplement the money that was extracted from the Society’s members by artfully passionate exhortations to “fight the Communists.”[17]

The money generated from Alex Jones’ supporters could be said to be working in the very same way against their own interests. Oliver makes another prophetic, parallel Jones-JBS critique,

…I note that Welch, perhaps on instructions, no longer has much to say about the “Communist Conspiracy,” and, after flirting with the notion of reactivating Weishaupt’s diabolic llluminati, seems to have settled on the conveniently nameless and raceless “Insiders” as the architects of all evil, inspired by an unexplained malevolence.

This describes Jones’ carefully crafted explanation of the world conspiracy as being merely the work of “globalists”, “the elite”, “Luciferians”, etc.
Oliver goes on describing the direct Jewish involvement in editorial policy,

…the Society still publishes American Opinion and the Review of the News, for which very competent journalists are hired to write under Jewish supervision, and both periodicals contain some authentic information that is not found in the New York Times, since they are censored for distribution to a different audience.[18]

Today, JBS publishes The New American.
Proving Oliver correct, on Sept. 13, 2011, JBS published an article by the Jewish Sam Blumenfeld endorsing the official kosher story of the 9/11 WTC attack.[19] Birch writer John Rees is alleged to be an “Israeli intelligence agent.”[20] Rees also allegedly provides intelligence to the CIA, FBI, and NSA.[21] JBS has also propagated the Holocaust dogma of Judaism.[22]
Oliver, again, details then what is now echoed about Jones as controlled opposition,

After my resignation, many individuals urged me to “expose” the Welcher, but almost all of them had already perceived that the Society had become a Jewish auxiliary, primarily used to keep the goyim confused and docile and to frustrate patriotic movements that had any potentiality of effectiveness.[23]

The JBS never addressed Oliver’s accusations but, instead, Welch and the society went on a public smear campaign against Oliver. Likewise, when confronted, Alex Jones never addresses his many Jewish and intelligence connections but ends up smearing the questioner or diverting the discussion.

Jewish Bircher Roy Cohn was reportedly the principle figure in the private intelligence dissemination network Western Goals Foundation (WGF), which appears to have been closely associated with JBS. Groups like JBS and the WGF allowed intelligence gathering to continue unabated in the fallout from the restrictive legislation that followed the 1970s COINTELPRO scandal. Using private interests allowed the intelligence apparatus to carry on without government interference.

Some have speculated that Alex Jones is financed by the Koch Brothers, who are members of JBS.

Jones advances the B’nai Birch legacy as part of CIA/FBI COINTELPRO
Jones’ 100 percent certified kosher conspiracy message has been consistent throughout the 18 years he has been active as a counter-intelligence operative, and it has been specifically Birch in nature. Even today, he overtly promotes JBS, even urging his listeners to join.[24] In Apri, 2006, Jones told current JBS CEO John McManus,

I want to work with you guys, to see you grow.

To which McManus replied,

…looking forward to seeing the relationship continue.

Jones even let follow Austinite and Bircher Bob Dacy fill in for him to carry out hosting duties of the Alex Jones show.
But as the JBS has somewhat faded today, Alex Jones has risen to popularity to carry on its legacy. It appears Jones was knowingly recruited by the CIA at some point during his John Birch-influenced upbringing. Along the way, he has been guided by the “Jewish supervisors” former Birch founder Oliver revealed directs the society—Stratfor in Austin, Texas being one such supervisor. Like National Review and like the JBS, Jones’ objective is to misdirect dissent to the New World Order conspiracy by homogenizing dissidents into a monolithic group that can be more easily directed by the conspirators. It’s interesting that Jones uses the word “experiment” when talking about his parents raising him. Could it be that his parents were somehow involved in the CIA or one its fronts? Jones Jr. then, was being groomed for work as a field agent from a very young age, which is not uncommon in the CIA.

Notes
[1] Alex Jones and Jewish Sponsors http://alexjonesexposed.info/alex-jones-and-jewish-sponsors/
[2] Wenner Media LLC – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jann_Wenner
[3] Meet Alex Jones, Rolling Stone, March 2, 2011 http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/talk-radios-alex-jones-the-most-paranoid-man-in-america-20110302
[4] Alex Jones Confronts George Bush http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NhmZSdmY0s
[5] The UN Deception https://www.jbs.org/shop-tna/the-un-deception
[6] Alex Jones Supports Israel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RNseMDToKdk
[7] William J. Grede Is Dead at 92; Joined in Founding Birch Society, New York Times, June 7, 1989 http://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/07/obituaries/william-j-grede-is-dead-at-92-joined-in-founding-birch-society.html
[8] Ibid.
[9] 1954 Guatemalan coup d’état http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1954_Guatemalan_coup_d%27état
[10] T. Coleman Andrews http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T._Coleman_Andrews
[11] Michael Collins Piper Responds to Alex Jones, Jim Marrs, and Robert Groden on JFK/Israel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB6LyCjEjNM
[12] Parallels between Alex Jones and CIA front National Review
[13] Ibid.
[14] Eustace Mullins, Murder By Injection, Staunton VA: National Council for Medical Research, 1988: 340-1
[15] Oliver, Revilo P., America’s Decline: The Education of a Conservative, Londinium Press (1981), p. 425
[16] The John Birch Society — Exposed!, John Bryant http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/NetLoss/NetLoss-Oliver.html
[17] Oliver, Revilo P., America’s Decline: The Education of a Conservative, Londinium Press (1981), p. 421
[18] Ibid, p. 425
[19] Blumfeld, Sam, The Meaning of 9/11, http://www.jbs.org/the-john-birch-society/the-meaning-of-9-11
[20] Is the Birch Society a Zionist Front? http://www.dcdave.com/article4/050308.htm
[21] Interhemispheric Resource Center, GroupWatch, Western Goals Foundation, References: 5. Letter from Sean Steinbach and Dominik Diehl, May 22, 1987. 8. Elton Manzione, “The Private Spy Agency,” The National Reporter (Summer 1985).
[22] John Birch Society Magazine Takes Aim at Holocaust Revisionism and the IHR http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n6p26_JBS.html
[23] Oliver, Revilo P., America’s Decline: The Education of a Conservative, Londinium Press (1981), p. 425-26
[24] Alex Jones welcomes John Birch Society President John McManus http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoaIFtr6E5E

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
June 23, 2014 Anno Domini

In Is Alex Jones externalizing the hierarchy?, I discussed how Alex Jones serves as cathartic relief for those resisting the New World Order and how he helps to get the masses comfortable with the NWO, thereby diffusing their opposition to it, making for a smoother transition to the one-world government.

To expand on that, I will break down some of the more technical methods Jones uses to psychologically traumatize his audience into accepting the New World Order, including his use of subliminal messages and neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), which is basically the manipulation of communication to provoke at the subconcious level (here is a good video example of how powerful NLP can be). NLP is most prominently used by salesman and mind programmers.

Suggestive Programming (NLP), Affirmations, and double meaning

The most obvious and ubiquitous programming Jones uses is the power of suggestion. You can set your watch by it. As of the writing of this article, Jones did it today on his show. He does it every single show. And that suggestion is the seemingly snide imitation of the elite. If you are listener, you know what I am talking about. It’s when Jones raises his voice and assumes the personality of one of the “elite” and then goes on to mock us victims of the NWO. He does not do this merely to entertain you. It is subtle suggestion and mockery of the victim—you, the listener. It’s a sort of psychodrama. What results from this process is the instilling of fear and learned helplessness into the listener (see Learned helplessness through the alternative media). And if I and many others are correct that Jones is working for the bad guys, then this suggestive programming is to mock us, which feeds their appetite as they destroy us with their world takeover.

As the mountebank delivered his harangue, the clown would repeatedly poke his head out from bemacabrehind the curtain, making fun of everything his master said, parodying his patter and twisting the meaning of his words. The mountebank played the perfect straight man, meanwhile.
Here he was, trying so hard to hawk his wares, and his own assistant was doing everything possible to undermine sales.

The merriment was of course intentional. While the clown seemingly encouraged the public not to buy the proffered merchandise, the mountebank knew full well that the bystanders would easily be converted into customers as soon as they forgot that they were, in fact, supposed to be buying. Once the audience had been effectively hypnotized, once its judgment and willpower had been weakened, the real sales pitch could begin…[i]

Does not John H. Townsen’s quote above remind you of Jones as he disingenuously mocks the NWO elite, specifically when he dressed up in clown makeup in a seeming mockery of US President Barack Obama? Researcher Michael Hoffman describes this suggestive programming as part of the Judeo-Masonic revelation of the method:

The alchemical principle of the Revelation of the Method has as its chief component, a clown-like, grinning mockery of the victim(s) as a show of power and macabre arrogance. When this is performed in a veiled manner accompanied by certain occult signs and symbolical words and elicits no meaningful response of opposition or resistance from the target(s), it is one of the most efficacious techniques of psychological warfare and mind-rape.

This ceremonial nose-thumbing, this perverse jesting and clowning is taken to the highest level of intensity by the Truth or Consequences principle which ultimately hinges upon the issue of consent.[ii]

In other words, as it applies to this case, Jones is mocking the victims of the NWO whilst gaining their consent to the tyranny.

In case you doubt that Jones uses or is even aware of NLP, the proof that he at least knows about it is in his film 911 The Road To Tyranny, in which he accurately points out George W. Bush using an NLP technique on the American people. Jones has also admitted to being well read in Edward Bernays’ book Propaganda. Bernays, a pioneer in public relations, was the nephew of Jewish kabbalist Sigmund Freud, who created the black art of psychoanalysis—something Jones also admits to using, at least on himself.

Another type of suggestion that Jones uses is to speak from the point of view of an elitist telling us how we must obey. Again, he does this nearly every show. To this conscious mind, this may seem harmless, but the unconscious mind interprets this message as a command, no matter how facetious the message may appear. In this example, Jones says “You will accept the love of Lucifer.” Again, if you pay close attention to his speech patterns, you will notice and example of this this in almost every show he does. He is breaking you, the listener, down. Here is another example where Jones assumes the role of Satan. Someone discovered yet another clip of Jones, in reverse speech, saying “I am Satan.”

Another, less used, technique Jones uses is the classic repetition command. At times you will hear him repeat a word or phrase. In mind control, a repetition count of three is the most common. See if you can find it in Jones’ dialogues. In just one example, in 911 The Road To Tyranny, you can find a repetition count of three in a few instances. Here us another example. He probably does it every show.

Trauma-based mind control
The element of fear can never be overstated. If you put aside Jones’ loud-mouthed, charismatic act, all you are left with is bad news, fear, and negativity. Between all the bad news going on with the New World Order takeover and Jones’ shouting fits, the listener hasn’t got a chance.

One form of trauma involves opposites (alternating leniency with harshness, simultaneously endorsing two opposing positions). Jones will speak very calmly and eloquently one minute, and the next minute, he is shouting at the top of his lungs, snarling and flailing his arms about. He will go back and forth between these two extremes. This is designed to traumatize the listener: hot and cold, violence and peace, stress and calm.

When leniency is alternated with harshnessness, the effect is devastating and disconcerting because the person looses the ability to predict what is going to happen. Everyone likes to control his or her life. Predicting what is going to happen is part of a person’s mind gaining control over their environment. Even that control is stripped from a slave. They soon learn to quit trying to protect themselves, and they quit trying to think for themselves but docilely submit to whatever fate assigns them…. The slave must reorganize reality through identification with aggressor (Illuminati master). Strong identification is created with the master. The slave is programmed to protect the master.[iii]

See how many times Jones will take you through this process in one show. This is further breaking you down, weakening your spirit, and strengthening the state of helplessness in you. Note in the above quote how the trauma aids the victim in identifying with their aggressor, in this case, Alex Jones. Could this by why his followers hang on his every word and defend him as if he is completely infallible?

Another aspect of fear that I must mention is subliminal messaging. We have proof that Alex Jones has used this at least on one occasion. My guess is that there are probably many more such instances; we just haven’t detected them yet. In the following clip from Jones’ documentary Police State 4: The Rise of Fema, a subliminal is flashed that is read by the subconscious mind as “submit to fear.” But it’s not like Jones needs to use a lot of these, as his show is already saturated with fearmongering messages.

Hollywood programming

The first thing one hears when they tune in to the Alex Jones show is the theme for the imperial forces of Darth Vader in the kabbalist-based Hollywood film The Empire Strikes Back, part of the Star Wars franchise. According to CIA MKUltra mind control researchers, Star Wars and even Star Trek are recurring themes in mind control programs. The music for the empire in Star Wars represents evil and darkness, at least as far as kabbalists understand it. Why would Jones use such a dark theme as the theme for his supposed resistance to the New World Order world empire? Contradictory, no? It is likely more suggestive programming.
Few people seem to have any problems with Jones’ close connections with Hollywood, whether it’s his friendship with the decadent drug addict Charlie Sheen, Jones appearing in two Zionist Hollywood films,[iv] or Jones making frequent analogous references to movies during the Infowars show. Anyone with any wisdom knows that television and Jewish-masonic Hollywood are key channels of control for the world conspirators. For Jones to be so closely tied to Hollywood is hypocritical at best or sinister at worst. Either he is in on the scam or just a dupe. But for someone as intelligent as Jones—one who executes the sophistication of such things as neuro-linguistic programming, the case seems to by the former.
Jones was featured as a “street prophet” in the 2006 film Scanner Darkly, starring Keanu Reeves, Robert Downey Jr., and the Winona Ryder. Those who have studied Hollywood mind control know that sigil magic is frequently used, so they shouldn’t be surprised when they see a character in Scanner Darkly wearing a T-shirt with a picture of the all-seeing eye encompassed by a pyramid. Apparently, Jones has no problem being a part of this. He also doesn’t seem to have a problem with the technocratic theme of the movie, even though he claims to oppose the “scientific dictatorship” and the technocracy.

Hypnotic spiral, Mnemonic circles

There are several ways to induce a hypnotic trance. Some of the more popular ones include the hypnosis spiral, the use of an object that glitters such as a piece of jewelry or a gold watch, and progressive relaxation.[v]

 Most of you are probably familiar with the black and white spiral of the hypnotist that goes around and around until the viewer is lulled into a trance. Today the Zionist controlled press uses these hypnotic spirals, just in a much more sophisticated way. This example from TSN/ESPN sports show, SportsCenter, shows the hypnotic circles being flashed continuously at the introduction of the show, during, and at the conclusion of the show. You can find these mnemonic circles just about everywhere on TV, but mainly on news channels. BBC, Russia Today, and NBC are some of the many who are using them. You would expect it from the mainstream media, but not from alternative media. Sadly, Jones’ Infowars and PrisonPlanet presentations are chock full of them. Below are some examples with links to actual video showing animated swirling, designed to put Infowars listeners into a trance.
The effect is that the trance will allow certain parts or all of the message to bypass the critical portion of the brain—where we analyze for truth what we are seeing and hearing—and seep into the subconscious. You might say that trances reaffirm other forms of mind manipulation—a sort of insurance policy on propaganda.

Sigil magic
Sigils are symbols. And when used by occultists, these symbols are believed to induce spells and trances. Hand gestures, NLP body movements, and symbols—Jones uses them all. Most notable are his use of the “V” symbol, the 666 (A-OK), and baphomet hand gestures.

According to one astute observer, Jones use the 666 sign any time he is talking about the elite (specifically the government or the European Union). In Is Alex Jones externalizing the hierarchy? I documented Jones’ fomenting of violence among his listeners. One observer has apparently discovered a call to violence through and NLP technique. One thing to note about the “V” symbol that Jones is always pushing is that in the TV series V, the alien subversion of Earth is represented by “V”. The V people are a euphemism for fifth column insurgents.

All of this is just too coincidental, especially considering what we already know about Jones, namely that he has close ties to the intelligence community and the Israel lobby. His tactics are becoming more and more transparent.

Alex Jones trained in NLP at Stratfor?
It is interesting that Stratfor—an Israeli-CIA intelligence gathering firm established in Austin, Texas in 1996— was on the mailing list of the International Hypnosis Research Institute, an organization that offers neuro-linghuistic programming training. The anonymous hack of Stratfor’s emails a few years ago also revealed that Marko Papic, a geopolitical analyst with Stratfor, discussed NLP with Kevin Leahy of Knowledge Advocate. With what we already know about Alex Jones’ connections to Stratfor, it wouldn’t be a stretch to see him getting trained through Stratfor. The various NLP groups could have contracts with the CIA.

Another Stratfor-Infowars-NLP connection is with a visual effects artist named Michael McWhirter, who worked on several of Alex Jones’ films, including TerrorStorm, The Obama Deception, and Fall of the Republic. Mcwhirter has also contributed to Hollywood films, but he is currently listed as systems developer for a company named Aon Hewitt, a provider of human capital and management services, in Austin, Texas. At the time of the hack, Stratfor had membership with Aon Hewitt. What’s more, McWhirter is a member of an NLP meetup in Austin, Texas. In his meetup profile, McWhirter writes of himself, “I’ve studied/practiced NLP and related therapies for about 8 years and have applied my studies towards my own system of personal navigation and belief pattern exploration.”

Notes
[i] Towsen, John H., “Clowns”, E P Dutton (November 1976)
[ii] Hoffman, Michael A., “Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare”, Wiswell Ruffin House, Dresden, New York, 1992. p. 90.
[iii] Wheeler, Cisco; Springmeier, Fritz “The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave”, Ch. 9
[iv] Alex Jones (III), Internet Movie Database (IMDB) http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1093953/?ref_=fn_al_nm_2
[v] Bergen, D. “Hypnosis Spiral and Other Methods to Induce Hypnotic Trance” http://www.streetdirectory.com/travel_guide/33138/alternative_medicine/hypnosis_spiral_and_other_methods_to_induce_hypnotic_trance.html

See short clip Controlled Opposition & Revelation of the Method
Read More here: How Alex Jones is helping the NWO

Revelation of the Method

The occult concept of the Revelation of the Method is the way the Judeo-Masonic elite program us to accept their control. By telling us what they will do before and/or after they do it, they create fear, paranoia, and mockery. They also believe that because we have been told, we are accepting their chains that bind us.

Psychodrama

1. an extemporized dramatization designed to afford catharsis and social relearning for one or more of the participants from whose life history the plot is abstracted
2. a dramatic narrative or work characterized by psychological overtones
3. an often ongoing psychological struggle; also :  an expression of psychological turmoil

It’s ironic that the mindset of members of the Church of Infowars is exactly the same as those who blindly follow the Jewish-controlled mainstream media. Church members have the audacity to project their own delusions onto the sheep of the mainstream flock. Knowing this should make it easier when selecting a strategy to use to awaken the Infowars sheep. In addition to addressing the underlying psychological condition that makes people susceptible to brainwashing, looking back in history and presenting a mountain of evidence against the subject in question should put a crack in the hardened toxic sludge that prevents truth from seeping into the brains of these sheep.

What we already know about Alex Jones
The evidence tells us that Alex Jones is a highly skilled counter-intelligence operative on the payroll of the state of Israel, via Stratfor and Mossad’s subordinate, the Central Intelligence Agency (Operation Mockingbird). He uses shock-and-awe expositions through his controlled-opposition media empire, with the goal of instilling fear in his listeners and hypnotizing them into a passive, lethargic trance. Jones has even admitted to having familial connections to the CIA. (Click the links, highlighted in red, for in-depth explanations.)

“Whenever I go to a family reunion, half the people in the room are former CIA.” —Alex Jones (The Opie and Anthony Show – 04-17-2013)

Incidentally, Jones gained a lot of his popularity early in his career by “predicting” the 9/11 attacks, of which, he later admitted he had “intel” on. What’s more, many of Jones’ guests on Infowars radio are either former or current intelligence and law enforcement officials. With all this chumming around with intelligence operatives, is it any wonder that he hired a CIA/Stratfor-connected editor in chief?

Another likelihood that has not yet been addressed by the alternative media is that Jones’ media empire functions to sequester opponents of the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy (New World Order) and to streamline them into an identifiable and thus more manageable group. Jones and his followers often refer to themselves as “infowarriors”.
This has various uses for the Elders of Zion, as we shall see.

The CIA establishes the National Review to homogenize conservative schools
Shortly after the CIA was established in 1947, at the height of the Cold War and during US Congress’ attempted purge of Communists in America, CIA agent William F. Buckley Jr. and Trotskyite James Burnham founded the National Review magazine, which would go on to be the editorial mouthpiece of “conservatives” in America. Economist and historian Murray Rothbard writes,

“Not long after the Central Intelligence agency was founded in 1947, the American public and the world were subjected to an unprecedented level of propaganda in the service of the US foreign policy objectives in the Cold War…. At its peak, the CIA allocated 29 percent of hits budget to ‘media and propaganda’.”[I]

What’s more, historian Murray Friedman claims in The Neoconseravative Revolution: Jewish Intellectuals and the Shaping of Public Policy (2006) that National Review, despite its Catholic appearance, was run by Jews, specifically Frank Meyer, Frank Chodorov, Morrie Raskin, Marvin Liebman, and Willi Schlamm. Neoconservatism was and is a Jewish movement. It serves the same purpose as National Review. Historian E. Michael Jones writes,

“National Review existed to destroy competing conservatisms, especially those incompatible with the international foreign policy establishment. National Review used conservatism to mobilize, certain ethnic groups, e.g., Catholics, behind government policies. It existed to colonize certain groups, to divide and conquer, and then get them to act against their own interests. NR was created to destroy isolationist conservatism. Conservatives who criticized America’s march to empire were demonized and decertified. National Review has shown undeviating consistency in this regard, the most recent example being David Frum’s diatribe against the paleoconservatives.”[II]

What E. Michael Jones describes here seems like an exact description of Alex Jones and Infowars, with NR’s streamlining of conservatism applicable also to the streamlining of conspiracists, 9/11 truthers, libertarians, resisters of the New World Order, etc. It’s important to note that National Review was founded for the purpose of serving the interests of both the CIA and Jews. This is also likely the case for Alex Jones and Infowars, as he has diffused any active resistance to the world government takeover and protected international Jews from any blame. As Jewish communist Vladimir Lenin admitted, “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.”

 “Much of what is attributed to William F. Buckley was the work of Jewish thinkers and financiers who…. Buckley was the goyishe front man for Trotskyite conservatism in the same way Gus Hall was the goyishe front man for American Communism…. Buckley was the ideological enforcer who would pronounce the political cherem on competing conservative sects and expel them from the synagogue. He was also the model for the Catholics he was to control by transforming them from recalcitrant ethnics into docile movement conservatives..His (Buckley) other job was to destroy any conservative movement not toeing the line of the internationalist establishment. All forms of ‘isolationism’ were anathema. It also meant and all out attack on anything ‘anti-Semitic'”[III]

As you can see, Alex Jones is the Zionist carbon copy of William F. Buckley. Jones is quick to call out anti-Semitism on his show and makes daily references to Hitler and the alleged Holocaust of six million Jews.

Infowars’ homogenizing effect
The conspirators gain several advantages by sequestering and homogenizing their opponents. First, opponents are told to think inside the box—the conspirator’s predesigned box, with “unity” being the catalyst for conformity.
The group is also given an identity, from which, if anyone deviates, that individual will be ostracized from the group. This is especially useful for the conspirators if that individual clues in to what’s going on and tries to alert the group. The group then purges itself of the very individuals who pose a legitimate threat to the conspirators. In this way, the group is now helping the conspirators whilst believing they are working against them. Spend enough time around a Infowarrior and you soon see how any dissent within the group is quickly demonized and marginalized, the very same way it is with those who blindly follow the mainstream media. And Like National Review, Alex Jones provides gentile window dressing for what is actually a Jewish movement: his anarcho-libertarianism based in the Masonic US Constitution.

Operation Mockingbird/Cointelpro

Operation Mockingbird came out in the 1950s shortly after the CIA was founded. It’s purpose was to influence the media. Both National Review and Encounter were likely creations of Project Mockingbird.
Mockingbird was started by the Jewish Cord Meyer and Illuminati stooge Allen W. Dulles. Then-CIA director William Colby testified to the Church Committee, a United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, that there were over 400 CIA agents spreading disinformation through the media as a part of Mockingbird. If the purpose of National Review, according to E. Michael Jones, bears any resemblance to the objectives of Operation Mockingbird, then this CIA program is also a movement that advances Jewish interests. So, if Alex Jones is a much later and more sophisticated Operation Mockingbird creation, it would make sense why he deflects any Jewish blame for the evils going on in the world, has a host of Jewish sponsors and backers, and prevents opposition to the world conspiracy from gaining any legitimate momentum. It also corroborates those who say that Jones is an agent provocateur spreading disinformation and disrupting public protests, like the Austin gun rally in 2010. Jones completely fit the description of a CIA agent provocateur/agitator/cointelpro at this particular event, then pulled a psyop by claiming those offended by this act of treachery were the actual provocateurs. There are many more examples, but this one stands out. The stunt proved to be a failure for Jones and his handlers. Whether Jones was sent there to disrupt and cause trouble or whether Jones arrogantly believed he could rally and centralize the dissenters not already in the Church of Infowars (homogenizing effect), it’s difficult to tell for sure. You may have heard of psychiatrists saying non-conformists are mentally ill; well, on several occasions Jones has said the very same thing of those who accuse him of being a plant. This isn’t the behaviour of an objective journalist but of a cult leader or counter-intelligence operative.

Cointelpro, an acronym for “counter-intelligence program”, is an FBI program designed to achieve very much the same thing as Operation Mockingbird. Since the United States’ intelligence organizations work in tandem, it’s likely that the two programs blend with one another and fall under the umbrella of the mother intelligence lodge in Tel Aviv, Israel, specifically the Israeli Mossad’s psychological warfare division Lohamah Pscichlogit (LAP). Jones is likely also involved with Cointelpro. While he does talk about these intelligence programs in his documentary films and on his radio program, it’s difficult to see these supposed revelations as anything more than providing a convenient alibi for Jones. And it certainly achieves this. I don’t know how many times I have heard his cult members say something like, “but he talks about Mossad and Cointelpro”; therefore, we are expected to believe he couldn’t possibly be involved in them. Right… keep drinking the Kool-Aid.

[I] E. Michael Jones, “Manipulating Catholic Support for the War: The Black Operation Known as Conservatism,” in Neo-conned Again: Hypocrisy, Lawlessness, and the Rape of Iraq (Vienna, VA: I H S Press, 2005), p. 175.
[II] E. Michael Jones, “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History”, Fidelity Press, South Bend, Indiana, 2008, p. 864.
[III] Ibid, p. 866