By Wall Street Journal
Nov. 11, 2021 Anno Domini

Russia’s Vladimir Putin is causing trouble in Europe again, first by massing troops on the border with Ukraine and now with a refugee crisis and energy threats through his ally in Belarus. Western Europe is upset but has itself to blame for being so vulnerable.

Belarus dictator Alexander Lukashenko stole last year’s presidential election and arrested opposition leaders. His increasingly violent crackdown prompted several rounds of European Union sanctions. He has retaliated by facilitating the movement of mostly Middle Eastern migrants to Europe’s borders.

Polish security officials have accused Belarusian forces of helping migrants break through border barriers. They say Belarusian units have pointed their rifles at Polish forces and simulated throwing grenades across the border. Hundreds of migrants tried to break through the Polish border this week, and thousands remain camped nearby. Some have died in the freezing conditions.

Now Mr. Lukashenko is playing the energy supply card. “We are heating Europe, they are still threatening us that they will close the border. And if we shut off natural gas there?” Mr. Lukashenko said Thursday, according to Reuters. “I would recommend that the Polish leadership, Lithuanians and other headless people think before speaking.”

This has the look of a Putin-inspired hybrid political campaign. The intention is to destabilize Poland and its neighbours while generating division within the E.U. So far the strategy has largely backfired. Warsaw’s spat with Brussels over rule-of-law issues is now on the back burner, and Brussels rightly has laid blame for the humanitarian crisis on Belarus. One senior EU official, reversing Brussels’ previous position, has said financing a border wall with Belarus is possible.

Russia is controlling the marionette here. Mr. Lukashenko once played Russia and the West off each other, but since the popular protests against him he has thrown in completely with Moscow. Mr. Putin is taking advantage, flying Russian strategic bombers over Belarusian airspace this week. The Kremlin has called on Europe to pay Minsk to halt the migrants while blaming Western intervention in the Middle East for the chaos. This trolling is Mr. Putin’s specialty: Create or encourage a crisis, blame the victim, and demand concessions to resolve the issue.

The larger strategic context is that Mr. Putin and his crony believe they can act with relative impunity because Europe is desperate for Russian gas amid an energy crunch. European leaders—especially lame duck German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron—cling to the illusion that talking to Russia will improve ties. Mr. Putin told Ms. Merkel in a phone call this week that Europe would have to negotiate directly with Minsk—giving a pariah state the legitimacy it craves.

The best near-term approach is to impose harsher sanctions on items like potash exports and to pressure Middle Eastern countries to halt flights into Minsk. In the long run, Europe will have to lessen its dependence on Russian energy. Killing the Nord Stream 2 pipeline would be an important start, if anyone has the nerve.

By Brandon Martinez
June 27, 2018 Anno Domini
Martinez Perspective

In Dugin’s 1997 book “Foundations of Geopolitics,” a maniacal screed advocating Russian world domination, the occultist openly calls for unleashing black racists against White America as a subversion strategy.

“Russia should use its special services within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism,” wrote Dugin. Provoking “Afro-American racists” was key to the strategy, Dugin opined, as that would serve to “introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity.” He further encouraged “all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics.”

In this light, the insurgent radical left sweeping America, with Black Lives Matter at the fore, fits neatly within Dugin’s plan to rile up the blacks against White America. Russia has openly been supporting US-based secessionists, as well as separatists in Europe. Leaders of Texan and Californian secession have direct links to Russia. The American libertarian movement, who function as extreme isolationists opposed to any US involvement abroad, are regular pundits on Russia Today and have strong Kremlin ties. They serve Dugin’s plan to isolate America from world affairs, giving Russia a free hand to act and carve out its Eurasian Empire. Crucially, Dugin stresses the need for Russia to align itself with parts of the Muslim world, especially Shiite Iran, and to wield them as an anti-American bulwark of suicidal religious radicals. Stoking up anti-American and anti-Western sentiment across the Middle East and Asia, to isolate the West from these resource rich areas, was key to Dugin’s master plan. He also called for the complete annexation of Ukraine, writing:

Ukraine as a state has no geopolitical meaning, no particular cultural import or universal significance, no geographic uniqueness, no ethnic exclusiveness, its certain territorial ambitions represents an enormous danger for all of Eurasia and, without resolving the Ukrainian problem, it is in general senseless to speak about continental politics. Ukraine should not be allowed to remain independent, unless it is cordon sanitaire, which would be inadmissible.

Those sentiments were echoed by none other than Richard Spencer, who is married to a Russian follower of Dugin.

Dugin’s book reads like a Russian Protocols of Zion, outlining sinister schemes to isolate, undermine and destabilize the US, UK and Europe, strategies which Russia has clearly activated today, thus anointing Russia as the “Third Rome” global superpower. Dugin wrote a more recent paper reiterating some of his 1997 ideas, titled “Principles and Strategy of Coming War,” which outlines Dugin’s strategies for his “spiritual war” against the US and Europe. Notably, influencing and mobilizing dissident elements in America is key to Dugin’s updated strategy. His numerous appearances on the Alex Jones show and his general outreach to Americans during the 2016 election show that he is not simply writing insane texts as intellectual masturbation – he’s actively pursuing these strategies in the public realm.

All of these dirty tactics that Dugin advocates were previously employed by the Russian Communist Party in their war against Western civilization. The communists themselves advocated mobilizing radicalized American blacks against White America, for destabilization purposes. Dugin is simply revamping old communist subversion tactics to infiltrate, divide and conquer the enemies of Bolshevik Russia.

Dugin advances an essentially occultic agenda of chaos magic to instigate the end of the world. A profile on Dugin noted that he,

believes that it is the ultimate theological destiny of Russia to lead modern day Hyperborean societies — including not only Russia, but all of Eurasia, from Korea to India to Portugal — away from a corrupt earthly existence and back to the pure, divine spiritual knowledge of the original Hyperboreans, resulting in the end of our world and the transformation of humanity to a divine existence. (Yes, you read that right — he wants Russia to bring about the end of the world, in pursuit of the spiritual transformation of all of society).

In his research of Russian occultism, journalist Marc Bennetts stumbled on Dugin’s occultist obsession with the apocalypse, writing:

Nevertheless, it appears Dugin’s occult studies continue to have an influence on his apocalyptic thinking: just two years ago, this hardline Russian nationalist thinker lectured in Moscow on the necessity of curtailing the “illusion” that is the planet Earth by bringing about the “end of the world”.

Yet, shockingly, so many lemmings in the alt-right follow and genuflect to this death-worshipping satanist.

By Louis Marschalko

Excerpt from The World Conquerors—The Real War Criminals, pgs 186-193

La Rebelion de las Masas in 1929, and it can be regarded as a basic work relating to the nature and problem of the masses of human society. But the importance of the masses was recognised long before the great Spanish sociologist wrote his work. The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion mention as early as 1897 that they had “replaced the ruler by a caricature of a government”, i.e. “by a President, taken from the mob, from the midst of our puppet creatures, our slaves”.

“Our puppet creatures, our slaves!” This definition has a decisive importance in assessing the problem of the Jewish world conquest.

No doubt capitalism, with its higher standard of living, improved social conditions, prolonged expectation of life, reduction of death rate, etc., has greatly increased the numbers of the masses. Hegel, Malthus, and Marx all noticed this increase of the masses and the menace of over-population, which by itself is nothing but a simple biological and statistical fact. Neither Jewry nor Bolshevism has anything to do with this biological phenomenon, which can be regarded as an example of the natural fecundity of life. Then, first Marx, and later the Protocols,  recognised the sinister possibility of “melting down” large crowds of people so as to form a characterless mass. To make a herd-like crowd out of the people is the surest way not only towards achieving Jewish world power but towards achieving power for any minority group.

“Without an absolute despotism, there can be no existence for civilisation,” state the Protocols, for: “What we have got to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police, and soldiers.”

“The division of society into masses and elite,” writes Ortega y Gasset, “is not so much a social differentiation as a classification of people into categories which do not necessarily coincide with the ranks of the higher and lower social classes. Strictly speaking, each social class has its masses and its elite.”

It is not difficult to recognise that ceaseless striving towards increasing the masses at the expense of the elite, which has been in progress throughout the century. To this result, no doubt, certain biological and hereditary factors contributed. These are dealt with by the American professor Lothropp Stoddard in his book Rebellion Against Civilisation. He ascribes the present crisis of humanity to the biological degeneration of the various races and to the disproportionate increase of world population—especially of the lowest and most worthless specimens. But world Jewry did its utmost to speed up this process during the century that has elapsed since the Marxist manifesto. Proletarians such as those composing the assault troops of Bela Kun or Sidney Hillman, who never bothered to consider what were the real aspirations of their leaders, became natural storm-troops of the masses. The theory of the class struggle, a typically destructive Jewish invention, tends in itself to increase the number of the mob. It levels downward and lops off heads above the average. The Press, and later, both radio and television, reinforced by the Jewish mentality of the Hollywood film industry, also contributed to the production of men with robot-like minds. Moreover, the mercenary spirit will neither educate the masses nor raise their intellectual status. On the contrary, by descending to the low intellectual standard of the average person, it will improve conditions for traders. In countries already conquered by Bolshevism, the breeding of colourless, leaderless masses, under the sole control of the “chosen”, is proceeding according to carefully worked-out plans. The Russian aristocracy, the middle classes, the intellectual elite, the landed peasantry, and those workers who could be regarded as the elite of the working class, were all executed. The independent landed peasantry were robbed of their lands and deported to Siberia. Individual and independent smallholdings were replaced by the kolkhoz system, and the “liberated” proletarians were enlisted in the works’ divisions of the factories, where they had no leaders any longer but lords and masters only.

The Jews sitting in Stalin’s brains trust were always aware that the “ruthless despotism” of the Protocols can only be exercised over herd-like masses. The greatest menace of Bolshevism is its creation of a herd-like mentality in the people, which thinks in terms of the lowest intellectual levels, which destroys all initiative in the individual and kills all differentiation of taste and personality. There are no Russian people left but Russian masses only, and in thirty years’ time, the same statement will apply to all the other enslaved States behind the Iron Curtain. There will be just masses all the way from Vladivostok to Stettin. The colour of their skin may be usually white, sometimes yellow, but their distinguishing characteristic will be the negative ones of the belonging to the masses. This will be a mass-produced, homogeneous and characterless human pulp that has been churned out on the assembly lines of the camps and in the retorts of Communist education propaganda. This is the youth produced by Communism and trained to have no individual thoughts or ideas of their own. They have ready-made slogans only, coined by propaganda. This is a herd of anthropomorphous beings, shepherded by Jewish commissars armed with tommy-guns. One sees no longer the glittering billions of single water-drops but only muddy and turbid flood waters.

So-called civilised man of the Western world is still unaware of the meaning and importance of these anthropomorphous masses, which have lost all knowledge of the outside world, of the beauties of life and of the value of personality. The Iron Curtain hermetically sealed them off from living thoughts and ideals. They possess less knowledge of the outside world than had the people of the Middle Ages. They know nothing about history, culture, or present-day life in the West. They live in a distorted dream-world produced and projected for them by Ilia Ehrenburg and David Zaszlavszky.

But unfortunately, the proud citizens of the West are little better off in this respect. Their knowledge, general outlook, and political ideas are similarly mass produced, controlled and directed by their Jewish entertainment monopolies. The personality of Western man has atrophied and his national heroes have been forgotten. Their place was taken by the most ridiculous figure of Western democracy, the “man in the street:, i.e., by the average half-educated, ignorant human being who is unable to think for himself. Today, this person states his opinion in the press, answers the questions of the Gallup poll, and represents public opinion and “world conscience”, in the name of which the scandal of Nuremberg was staged and the massacre of Katyn was hushed up. What does this “sharp-witted” individual, this constant reader of picture-comics and detective stories, known about the “Elder Statesmen” performing behind the screen of the political parties, about the plans of the “initiates”, about decisions of the lodges, and about the lies of the press? He simply reiterates everything hammered into his head by journalists and newspaper kings of Galician Jewish origin. And the columnists of democratic and republican organs alike will, of course, only spread such “opinions” as favour the world conquerors.

Thus, we can readily understand how it is that the so-called statesmen who appear to rule the world are, on the one hand, puppets of powers behind the scenes, and on the other, slaves of the mob. Politicians do not act any more according to the rules of common sense but are obliged to rely on the taste and mood of the masses. They think in terms of the masses and they allow themselves to be carried away by the masses. The statesman of the past, after working out a clever programme, submitted it to the electors, hoping to convince them to do the right thing, i.e., to adopt his proposals. The present-day politician first tries to find out the general trend of pubic opinion and then adjusts his own views to this. But when Jewry, disposing of all the modern media of propaganda, made the masses its sounding-board, statesmen dependent on the masses fell a ready victim to the will of Jewry.

The most successful politician in these days of “peace” is he who can drive the largest crowds to the polling booths, to prop up by votes the policy he has broadcast previously through radio and television.

Even war itself no longer serves as a last resort in the pursuit of higher ideals; it has one purpose only, which is the extermination of large masses of people. The A-bombs, H-bombs, and carpet-bombs are no longer weapons of war between nations, but between masses. A lurid murder, or social scandal connected with a film star, makes headlines nowadays, but 300,000 dead in Dresden or 70,000 in Hiroshima can be ignored or perhaps dealt with in a small news item of five lines.

We have already mentioned that world Jewry, in order to increase the number of destitute masses, utilises mankind’s natural urge for revenge. After the last war, many people thought that the increase in the number of destitute masses was the work of Bolshevism, and thus Yalta and Potsdam were debited to Stalin’s account. However, after a certain time, it transpired that during the Potsdam conference, held under triumvirate of Stalin, Truman, and Attlee, world Jewry in the form of the Morgenthau Plan and the Gomberg Plan, stood by all the time in either democratic or Bolshevik guise. The purpose of both was the extermination of the elite and the reduction of the people to destitute, herd-like, characterless masses.

The Potsdam Agreement made twelve to sixteen million people Stateless. The Eastern European independent landed peasantry, and the skilled craftsmen and artisans of the Sudetenland were reduced to a destitute proletarian mass thrown across the frontiers with a hundred pounds weight of luggage per head. The nazi professors were forced to do the job of street sweepers and the nazi street sweepers were thrown out of their jobs. The Transylvanian Saxons were carried off to Siberia, while the highly cultivated German settlers of Southern Hungary and Northern Yugoslavia were sent to Tito’s extermination camps, where glass powder was mixed into their food. Sixteen million people were torn from their country and made into a rootless, Stateless, destitute, hungry mob. They were driven like cattle towards Western Germany in the name of humanity.

Previously, Beria had liquidated the Polish intellectuals and national leaders in the Katyn Woods. Eleven thousand officers, mostly doctors, professors, and artists, were called up from their civilian professions, were exterminated, and more than a million Poles were carried off to Siberia. Who were responsible for this? According to the official records of the U.S. Congress Investigating Commission, Father Braun reported concerning his Russian adventures (Reports of Investigations, page 197) that he had seen the secret police at work between 1936 and 1937, during the days of comrades Jeshov, Jagoda and, more lately, Beria (all three of them Jews—AUTHOR). They were successive chiefs of the secret police. He had also seen the Russians (Jews) murdering their own countrymen in cold blood. In view of the fact that internees were murdered by the thousand in the concentration camps of the Soviet Union, and that these atrocities were regarded as merely routine work not worthy of mention, it can be understood that the extermination of influential Poles such as doctors, writers, professors, and civil servants, etc., was similarly regarded. The report adds that this was just a part of their general plan, which was the systematic extermination of racial and national groups.

Are Jeshov, Jagoda-Herschel, and Beria the only culprits haunting the common graves of the victims of the Katyn Woods? Goriczki, a Polish witness who escaped from the mass-executions, told the American Committee investigating into the slaughter of Polish prisoners at Katyn: “…when the groups were ready to march, two officers of the political police, Colonel Urbanovitz and a Muscovite Jew, Commissar Sirotky, were standing near me. I overheard Sirotky remarking to Urbanovitz: ‘Yes, they are happy and laughing now, bu tif they knew what is coming to them…!’” (Reports of Investigations, page 176.)

So it appears that not only did the Jews organise and carry out the Katyn Wood mass-murders, but that though Robert Kempner, the American public prosecutor at Nuremberg, they tried to conceal the truth from the world.

Thus, in a few days or perhaps in a few hours, they exterminated the elite of the Polish nation and with it, most of the intellectual class.

The colourful, free Hungarian elite, so individual in outlook, was similarly annihilated in 1945 with the help of the People’s Tribunal Act, when the list of “war criminals” was handed over to the Americans.

And so, biological class warfare, based on Talmudic commandments, progresses relentlessly. The Marxist theory has now reached a higher rung on the ladder. For the physical extermination of the Christian elite, there are Soviet prisons as well as the gold-diggers’ camps in the Arctic Circle where, according to recently returned prisoners of war, five million people are forced to slave. World Jewry, whose total strength is about 15 million, is clearly aware that it can become the sole ruling class of all nations, once it succeeds in exterminating those social layers whose calling, on account of their intellectual faculties and integrity of character, is to be the leaders of their respective nations. With this end in view, the ignorant masses, “pink” intellectuals and other bribable characters are invited to serve the ends of the world conquerors to the extent of betraying their own race and nation. The conditions prevalent behind the Iron Curtain show more clearly than anything else that the fifteen million Jews could soon become a supranational middle class, ruling over entire nations and whole continents. A ruling class no longer needs to do any inferior or subordinate work. Their next generation can safely occupy the leading positions in all states. They wish, no doubt, to repeat the feat accomplished in Soviet Russia, where Jewry moved up from the bottom to the top of the social ladder. 

And to attain this aspiration, it is quite enough to carry out the Talmudic commandment:

“Kill the best of the Goyim!”

Gunnar D. Kumlien has written a very interesting article about biological class warfare in the Rheinischer Merkur of October 4th, 1957. This paper is closely connected with Chancellor Adenauer. In this article, he records a conversation he had in Moscow recently with a Russian intellectual just released from one of the Siberian slave-labour camps. He could only speak in the greatest secrecy with this intimidated, scared man, because it was the forty years of the Bolshevik “revolution” they were discussing.

“That section of society which retained an ideological independence,” said the Russian, “does not count any longer today. Its strength twenty years ago was as high as about twenty per cent of the population. It was still ten per cent about ten years ago. Supposing it was to have been reduced one per cent per annum, you can imagine how much is left of it.”

A Swedish journalist who reported recently on living standards in the Soviet Union gave a shocking picture of proletarian masses crowded in slums. The party keeps them in such poverty and in such low living conditions that the whole of their life consists of a ceaseless fight to keep themselves alive, and thus they have no time left to deal with political problems or to have any thoughts of their own at all.

Should the biological class struggle to be applied to the spiritual leaders of Jewry, the Jews would call it “anti-Semitism” at once. Yet the cold-blooded, systematic slaughter of the elite of the Russian people and of the nations behind the Iron Curtain is not anti-Russian, anti-Hungarian, or anti-Chinese! Nevertheless, the consequences of this biological class struggle would remain permanent features even after the downfall of Bolshevism.

For the systematic extermination of the elite entails a good many alarming consequences. Due to the fact that the most cultured individuals, the most capable workers, the most intelligence farmers, and the most skilled tradesmen and artisans were destroyed in the countries behind the Iron Curtain, the quality of production in all trades has sunk accordingly. There is no taste or “finish” applied to the various good manufactured. Ornamental skill has become a luxury; chair legs will not be planed or given a smooth surface, and the most common consumer goods are no longer available. The “new intellectuals”, mass produced through “potted” courses, are nothing else but the slaves of the masses and are thus unable to direct trade, finance, or agriculture. The level of the sciences is reduced to the minimum; the doctor becomes a mere quack, and the ordinary scientist has little more knowledge than a foreman. On the soil of the Ukraine, the most fertile land on Earth, the yield of wheat is lower now than ever before (eight cwt. per acre); the world famous vineyards of Tokaj are in ruins and the plants dried up, the standard of the fruit-growing has regressed 100 years. The wheat fields of the Banat (in Southern Hungary and Northern Yugoslavia) where, due to the industry and skill of the German settlers, finest agriculture on earth flourished, are overgrown today by weeds, and the houses of the Sudetenland are in ruins. The population lives and starves in misery. The shapeless felt boots and the standard quilted and padded jackets are the only articles of clothing available to the enslaved masses. Whoever can look ahead can but visualise an appalling future: civilisation buried under the quicksands of the desert or overgrown by the jungle. Owing to the extermination of the elite, this menace hangs of the civilisation of all Christian nations as well as over the culture of all races.

The great martyred Hungarian patriot, Laszlo Endre, prophesied from his prison: “Proletarianised Europe will face them [the Jews] with such debased and brutalised instincts that the most savage means, necessary to suppress the most savage revolt of slaves, will have to be used to keep the people in bondage.”

There will be no more revolutions or wars of independence, but slave risings only. What a future!

At this juncture, somebody may point out that when this stage has been reached, then in all probability, the world conquerors’ power and privileges will also come to an end. Perhaps they will! But the world conquerors do not like to look into the future. They sit in the seats of the mighty.

By Jude Duffy
May 29, 2020

Ireland has a worse immigration problem than Germany, Sweden, the UK or France. That statement will astonish many people, but they can confirm its truth by spending a weekend in Dublin or any other city in the Republic of Ireland. On O’Connell Steet, Dublin city centre’s main thoroughfare, foreigners often outnumber native Irish at a rate of well over 100 to one. The official figures say migrants account for around 15 per cent of the Irish population—much higher than in most European countries, but still a huge underestimate.

These days you can drive from the centre of Dublin to its northern inner suburbs without seeing one white Irish pedestrian en route. Schools in many parts of Dublin have almost no white Irish pupils, and convenience stores, restaurants and supermarkets are staffed overwhelmingly by south Asians, Africans, Chinese and Eastern Europeans. Last year Merkel and her fellow Rotchshild shills opened the gates of continental Europe to millions of “refugees”, but successive Irish governments had beaten them to it by about 20 years. From the mid-1990s onwards, Ireland welcomed hundreds of thousands of migrants from all over the globe. This process accelerated rapidly from the mid 2000s onwards—to the point where foreigners now form a majority in many localities.

Take for example the formerly sleepy seaside village of Balbriggan, just 15 miles north of Dublin city: The 2011 census says that out of a population of almost 20,000, 31 per cent are ethnically non-Irish and 12 per cent are black. Even five years ago, a walk down its streets indicated that this figure vastly understated the number of foreigners residing there. Indeed Africans predominate at street level to such an extent that popular parlance has renamed the town “Blackbriggan”.

Many rural towns—e.g., Longford in the midlands, and Gort and Ennis in the west – have been similarly overwhelmed. And the invasion shows no sign of slowing down, much less ending. Indeed, far from seeking to put a lid on the problem, the Irish state class go looking for new migrants – for all the world like a poultry farmer beckoning foxes on to his land. Recently, an Irish naval vessel “rescued” almost 800 “refugees” off the coast of Tripoli and shipped them to Ireland. Britain says it will take twenty thousands of refugees over a five-year period; Ireland, a much smaller economy, says there is no upper limit on the number it will accept.

The visual evidence of the streets confirms that this is no idle boast. Even in the last few months, the number of burqa-wearing women on Irish streets has risen dramatically.

Unlike the German, Swedish, or British immigration crises, there has been no discussion, much less outcry, about this co-ordinated invasion of Ireland from all corners of the globe. In fact, any debate on the issue dwells exclusively on whether the Irish state and the Irish people are doing enough for the new arrivals. British newspapers like the Sun, and the Daily Mail wax indignant about the immigration problems of the UK, but their sister versions in Ireland denounce any similar concern on the part of Irish people as vicious racism.

By the same token, Irish media commentaries on the Brexit referendum last Summer invariably acknowledged the “legitimate concerns of the British people about immigration”. No argument there, of course, but these Anglo-Zio-Masonic outlets deem any similar concern on the part of Irish people about a proportionally much larger influx completely out of bounds.

Unsurprisingly Jewish tribal supremacists feature prominently among those who promote the immigration cause in Ireland, chief among them the veteran politician Alan Shatter. Shatter, a doyen for decades of cultural Marxist and anti-nationalist causes, engineered the rise to prominence of the former Taoiseach (Irish Prime Minister) Enda Kenny—up to that point an obscure journey man rural TD (Irish member of parliament), and rumoured transvestite.

In 2008, the then Taoiseach, Brian Cowen, was caught on a live mic in Dail Eireann calling Kenny, Shatter, and the rest of the Fine Gael opposition front bench “Freemason Fuckers”. Within a few weeks of this outburst, Cowen’s government was hit by a huge financial and economic crisis instigated by Goldman Sachs—a crisis that shredded the last vestiges of Ireland’s political and economic independence. Cowen staggered on in office for another two years, at which point a Masonic cabal in his own party ousted him and installed one of their brethren, Michael Martin, as leader. After the ensuing general election in early 2011, Kenny and his fellow “Freemason Fuckers” took power.

Shatter lost no time in showing who called the shots in the new regime, by grabbing for himself no less than four senior ministries: Justice, Defence, Equality, and Law Reform. As Minister for almost everything, he avidly promoted mass migration and regularly hosted elaborate mass citizenship ceremonies for the “new Irish”.

Like his fellow Zionist advocates of open borders for Ireland, his enthusiasm for immigration to Ireland is only matched by his support for an Israeli state that imprisons and deports African asylum seekers and is openly racist by its very nature.

Jewish tribalists like Shatter, Ronit Lentin, and the multipurpose cultural Marxist activist Ivan Bacik abound in the Irish “anti-racist” and pro-migration movements, but it would be a cop-out to imply that Jews alone drive this movement. The vast majority of the presstittutes and political whores who promote mass immigration in Ireland, are, alas, self-hating cucks of Irish Catholic stock. And where the presstitutes lead, the sheeple follow. Lament the huge demographic transformation of Ireland and many Irish men will respond by simpering in true girly “pathological altruist” fashion: “Sure, we emigrated everywhere”—as if the Irish are duty-bound to succumb to collective suicide, merely because, they, like every other European nation, have a history of emigration.

For many Irish men, the ultimate statement of their masculinity is not pride in their country, but a nerdishly obsessive devotion to English soccer teams like Manchester United or Chelsea. They exemplify the cultural phenomenon I call the “macho mangina”: those men who have no stomach for defying the Feminist-thought cops and national suicide engineers, and who, instead, overcompensate by adopting a lifestyle the corporate crass media, with clear diversionary intent, sets before them as “manly” – e.g., obsessive interest in sport, cars, alcohol, heavy metal, porn, etc.

The Makow site often refers to the illuminati’s penchant for projecting on to their enemies the machinations they themselves perpetually engage in. Since the foundation of the new state, Anglo-Irish Masonry has habitually deployed this technique. Irish literature, for example, has long been one long whine about the power the Catholic Church and “narrow-minded Irish nationalism” supposedly wielded over the society at large in days of yore.

Masonic hogwash. Even at the height of Eamon De Valera’s alleged Catholic “theocracy”, Masonic Protestants and Jews owned all the major banks and industries in Ireland. Some of them, like Guinness, continued anti-Catholic employment practices until well into the 1960s. Ireland’s leading newspaper, The Irish Times, only got its first nominally (very nominal indeed) Catholic editor in the mid-1980s. Two of the first four Irish presidents of the Irish state were Protestants, even though Catholics accounted for over 95 per cent of the population. Trinity College Dublin was another Protestant citadel.

As for the vexed issue of clerical sexual abuse, some prominent Anglo Irish Protestants, to their great credit, have lamented how the Irish media and state class deliberately suppress information about such abuse in Protestant denominations—the presstitutes’ clear intent being to foster the false impression that this disgusting vice is a purely Catholic problem. And even the notoriously un-Catholic Catholic Archbishop of Dublin has revealed that the same Irish government which relentlessly bashes the Church for covering up clerical sexual abuse has written to him requesting that he allow lay teachers convicted of child sexual abuse to continue teaching in Catholic schools! As they say, you couldn’t make it up.

There’s method in all of this. By depicting the founders of the Irish state as blood-crazed psychos, and the Catholic faith as an all-powerful religion of repressed, sadistic perverts, the Anglo-Zionist Irish media instill in the Irish people a crippling guilt about the very existence of their nation. And, needless to say, this form of psychic driving offensive dovetails perfectly with the mass-migration agenda. If you’ve been taught to believe your nation has no right to exist, why on earth would you fight its destruction?

There is almost no white nationalist movement in Ireland to speak of, partly for the reasons already cited, but also because old-school Irish nationalists can have no truck with an Anglo-white nat movement, which, much more often than not, loathes any form of Irish nationalism, and is slavishly devoted to the Ultra-Judaeo-Masonic tenets of Ulster British Orangeism (an enthusiasm Anglo-white nats share with their alleged enemies in the Talmudic Neocon movement.

Not that there are many old school nationalists left anyway. From the 1970s onwards, both wings of Sinn Fein/IRA were co-opted by their Anglo-Masonic enemies, and bizarre as it may sound, both now act as mouthpieces for the anti-nationalist agenda of mass migration and multiculturalism. The same applies to all the other political parties. Indeed, to an extent unparalleled by any other European country, Irish culture is defined by knee-jerk adherence to PC shibboleths.

Today the country is in a post-depression phase. Wages have been slashed, working hours increased, and draconian new taxes levied—all in response to the manufactured economic “crisis” of 2008. Shatter has been forced out of frontline politicals, but his protégé Dame Enda clung on as Taoiseach by his (varnished?) fingernails—with an openly homosexual half-Indian, Leo Varadkar, waiting in the wings to take over (which he now has).

The same Goldman Sachs lackeys who enforce this austerity affect to see no contradiction in continuing their de facto open borders policy, not to mention providing lavish social welfare, health, education, and so on, to the new arrivals. The political whores and the presstitutes defend this harishirt agenda by screaming “The party is over! The money just isn’t there anymore!” Needless to say, they never get around to explaining why, if this is the case, so much largesse still abounds for the many tens of thousands of migrants who are waved through at our airports, ports, and northern border every year. The lackeys’ economic policy is like a father donating the family’s savings to able-bodied panhandlers, while forcing his wife and children to live on dry bread and water.

Because of their small numbers (around 4.5 million), the massive volume of new arrivals, and the complete absence of any form of organised resistance, the native Irish face ethnic extinction much sooner than most other western nations. But as things stand, that does not seem to bother most of them too much—or at least not enough to do anything about it. After all, there are more pressing things to worry about: Manchester United are struggling to regain their form in the English Premier League….