By Timothy Fitzpatrick

Christ mythicists like Joseph Atwill, Christopher Jon Bjerknes, and Adam Green (none of whom are historians or religious scholars) don’t like to be accused of parallelomania in there agenda to discredit Jesus Christ, so let’s have a little fun and draw our own parallels between the suspicious agenda of these spurious characters and Soviet-era anti-religious propaganda.

Perhaps the reader will come to the same conclusion that I have, that these characters, specifically Green and Bjerknes, are using anti-Zionism as a cover for an anti-Christ agenda—that they are not equally opposed to Abrahamic religions as they claim. Surely, if they were, they would devote as much time to ridiculing and mocking Mohammad and the Jewish god Hashem/Ein Soph/Jews collectively as they do Jesus Christ (using almost entirely Jewish sources, I might add). But they don’t, especially not Adam Green. Why is that?

It’s true that the Soviets were not the first to advance the idea that religion, especially of Jesus Christ, were fraudulent mechanisms for control. It seems the gnostic/Masonic Enlightenment era brought out the very first Christ mythicist parallelomaniacs. The Soviets, being rooted in the Kabbalah, were merely carrying out the same agenda birthed during the Enlightenment—fostered by Judeo-Masonic forces in academia, the media, and in the intelligence apparatuses.

The Soviet propaganda meme above depicts religious leaders and pagans (even a tree) dancing in a ring while Jesus Christ is singled with what appears to be a devil in tow. This is not by chance. Christ seems to be singled out more than any other religious leader/symbol. Much of Soviet propaganda fixates on Christ and the church (specifically the Orthodox in Russia). Adam Green, Bjerknes, and others do the very same thing, in the Soviet/gnostic/masonic tradition. Their covert target rests squarely on our Lord Jesus Christ, because it is against Him, alone, that they conspire. The little that is said about Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, etc., is merely collateral damage. As you will see, even the Soviets were occasionally allowed to throw their own leaders, the Jews, under the bus, so long as Christianity was discredited in the process. They are allowed to superficially criticize Jews (anti-Zionism), just as long as they don’t drag any real issues into the propaganda.

This all raises the question. Is the international Communist conspiracy directing the Christ mythicist movement today?

In this piece, we see the three Abrahamic religions, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam depicted as mechanisms for control, the exact thing Christ mythicists claim.

The piece on the left shows what appears to be a Chassidic Jew using Christianity as bait. Green and Bjerknes claim that Christianity is a Jewish invention used to control the masses.

The Abrahamic religions portrayed as a three-headed beast.

Here, the creepy man’s shadow becomes a cross with ‘religion’ written across it. In his pocket is a Bible. The caption reads: ‘Step across the ominous shadow and join the crowd in the joyful bustle of the day!’

In this mockery of Palm Sunday, Christ is depicted riding into America with Jews in line behind him. Green and Bjerknes rest their entire case on Christianity being a Jewish conspiracy to enslave mankind. Bjerknes, by the way, claims to be anti-Communist.

This appears to show the devil appearing as Christ through the fog of drunkeness. Again, parallels with Green and Bjerknes saying that Jesus or God is Satan.

Here we see the (Jewish) Soviets depicting a Chasidic Jew (their own real world controllers) with some kind of capitalist fat cat in his lap and the Ten commandments above. The idea here, it seems, is to denigrate God’s laws. Notice that the Chabadnik is portrayed as having one (all-seeing) eye, perhaps as some kind of revelation of the method antic.

These anti-Christs never stray from their hatred of Christ for very long. Christ is depicted as trying to hock his wares.

The Abrahamic religions narrative again. The Soviet worker they have boiling the clerics looks like a devil himself.

The Pope is central in this propaganda piece (with a reverse swastika). The Abrahamic religions are portrayed as worshipping money (a capitalist fat cat).

The Commie fist is depicted smashing a capitalist fat cat while the Pope looks on in horror.

The Pope is depicted as a harbinger of death while his lackey Nazi henchmen burn books. The Soviets and Jewry have advanced for decades the idea that the Catholic Church and the Nazis were secretly allied.

Christ, America, and capitalism are portrayed as the cause of oppression of blacks (Black Lives Matter is a Kremlin invention and goes way back. See ‘I trained in Moscow for Black Revolution’—Leonard Patterson  (Video).

“There is no God!” The Soviet astronaut above the symbols of the Abrahamic religions seems to suggest that there is no god, there is only science (materialism).

Christian is portrayed as a scoundrel in contrast to a glowing depiction of Soviet science.

The three Abrahamic religions are depicted in opposition to the Soviet superman. Of course, Christianity is prominent among the three.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Feb. 23, 2022 Anno Domini
Book Review

“But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema” ‑Galatians 1, 8

The Lady of Fatima and the Anti-Christ—The Fatima narrative in the light of Catholic truth (2018) is a book that will no doubt anger many Catholics, but if the book has any truth, as the Latin maxim says, “Let justice be done though the heavens should fall.” Some angels, along with Satan, did fall from the heavens and posed as the Virgin Mary at Fatima, Portugal in 1917 as part of a strategic apocalyptic setup—this is the theme of Bernal Diaz’s book.

He attempts to penetrate the official Vatican narrative of the so called apparition of the Virgin Mary (“Our Lady of Fatima”) at Fatima from multiple angles, including through the credibility of the primary witnesses (three young children); the contradictions in the apparitions’ messages and manifestations with traditional Catholic dogma; inconsistencies with the apparitions’ identities and behaviour; the similarities between physical phenomena at Fatima and demonic encounters; and the subversive effects from the cult of Fatima resulting in leading its members into paganism, Islam, and accepting a Crimean-based anti-Christ. (I’ve used apparitions in the plural form because we don’t know that it has been only one apparition to have appeared at Fatima multiple times. It could be multiple entities posing as the same person multiple times).

The latter angle may seem like a bit of a stretch as it pertains to Islam, especially for readers of Fitzinfo.net, but if one considers Islam as a subset of Jewish-Masonic world Noahidism, the author’s conclusions can work from, say, the Catholic worldview presented by Monsignor George F. Dillon in Grand Orient Freemasonry Unmasked (1885) or a similar one presented by La Civilta Cattolica in On the Jewish Question In Europe (1890). It seems that the Catholic Church has warned its flock more of the dangers of subversive Jewish behaviour than it has of Islamic. After all, it’s the “perfidious Jews” for whose salvation we ought to pray more so than the Islamic infidels, it seems. The passage of time has show Islam as the Jewish lackey that it is.

“Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years we were in exile…. And now, Europe is losing its identity in favour of another people and another religion…. Even if we are in a major war with the region’s Arabs over the Land of Israel, Islam is still much better as a gentile culture than Christianity.” —Rabbi Baruch Efrati, 2012

To his credit, Diaz does touch on the Jewish-Islam partnership in the last chapter.

Nonetheless, Islam could play a larger role in the anti-Christ deception than we might imagine, as Diaz suggests. Perhaps it could be that Jewry loses control over Islam, and it takes on a bloody, revolutionary life of its own, like it has done many times in history. Furthermore, it’s becoming apparent that Judaism is nothing but repackaged ancient paganism with a special focus on racial identity. If Islam is a creation of Judaism, like many clerics believe, then all the more does it accomodate a push for revived paganism under the anti-Christ in the end days. If the devil chose “Our Lady of Fatima” to spread a false gospel—human and goddess co-redemption—because of its association with Mohammad’s daughter Fatimah and to facilitate the grotesque union of Catholicism with Islam, perhaps it explains why some Fatimists are so pro-Islam. According to these Islamophiles, like with the Judeophiles, Muslims are part of God’s plan of salvation. That’s quite an absurd conclusion, but it seems to be spreading among even so called traditional Catholics (E. Michael Jones anyone?). According to Diaz, it may be that Mary’s immaculate conception was hijacked and applied to Mohammad’s daughter Fatimah through the demon(s) posing as “our lady” at Fatima, Portugal as some sort of twisted mockery and blasphemy, and to blur the line between Catholicism and Islam. Fatimah is portrayed as a sinless goddess figure in the Islamic Quran.

“Satan appeared as Fatimah, the daughter of Mohamet, and called himself “Our lady of the Rosary” while others have given him the name “Our Lady of Fatima.” This last title implies a lady that is derived from Fatima. In other words, Satan came as the lady Fatima!”

A warning to readers who are already offended by the subject of this book but might be reading this review out of curiosity: the author makes even more controversy by taking sedevacantism (vacancy of the Holy See) back beyond it’s common starting year of 1958 to 1878, when the supposed last valid Pope, Pius IX, died. As extreme as this may sound, it’s a notion not entirely new in our time. Michael Hoffman’s 2017 book The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome seems to suggest that the last valid pope was some time before the Medicis took over the papacy. But the reader should not let this dissuade them from reading this book, as it largely deals with the technical and spiritual problems with the cult of Fatima. Diaz fully references his sources—all 301 of them. It’s worth reading, even if you believe Fatima was authentic. I found it difficult to put the book down.

Diaz draws an interesting conclusion from the name of one of the key players in the Fatima narrative, Fatima’s child witness Jacinta, which he sees as a providential clue as to the origins of the apparitions (Jacinta is Portuguese for Hyacinth).

“Saint Hyacinth cut the pagan ‘sacred’ oak tree down. Some accounts say there were visible demons that left the tree. In any case, given the satanic nature of the apparitions at Fatima, it isn’t difficult to understand the symbolic nature of this girl being named after the saint who cut the “great oak” tree down. The tree the “lady” of Fatima appeared on was yet another oak tree. One of the children was named after Saint Hyacinth who fell the first tree. It was left to Jacinta to “fell” the tree of these Satanic apparitions. Jacinta failed in this task. It is now the turn of each individual soul to comprehend and help others see and understand the evil nature of these apparitions.”

Phenomena associated with classic demonic encounters that was present at the Fatima apparitions includes buzzing sounds (that of a bee or fly); lightning, clouds, glowing globes, chilling of the air, and negative physiological and/or psychological effects in humans.

“Beelzebub is the god of flies and of course he is a devil. Buzzing is the sound they heard at the apparitions,” writes Diaz. “Not the Virgin Mary, not ‘UFOS.’ Islam’s false prophet had a similar experience….”

As the Fatima apparition came down to the Earth like lightning, so, too, does Satan:

“And the seventy-two returned with joy, saying: Lord, the devils also are subject to us in thy name. And he said to them: I saw Satan like lightning falling from heaven.” (Luke 10:17-18)

These are just some of the many disturbing revelations discussed in the book.

The biggest red flag seems to be the out-of-character display by the Fatima apparition supposedly posing as Mary. Mary has not and never would elevate herself above her Son, as she seems to do at Fatima. Everything else comes unglued from there, as Diaz demonstrates.

“The teachings of Antipope Pius X about the Virgin Mary being Co-Redemptrix was in preparation for the loathing false teachings coming from Fatima that turns the honest seeker of Mary’s intercession into an act of repugnant adoration of a false goddess.”

Here’s a final pair of quotes from the book that relates to the Soviet-Israel, perestroika-deception focus of Fitzinfo.net:

“It is very possible that the beast of Fatima will react to a “consecration” from the antipope by pointing to a man in Crimea/Russia as the answer to world peace either then or in the future.”

…

“Based on the book of Daniel, Bishop Wamesley believes the Antichrist will come from ‘Crim Tartary,’ the modern day Crimea, which was annexed from the Ukraine and joined with Russia on March 18, 2014. This may be the case since the demon of Fatima directed our attention to Russia. To this very day the followers of the Fatima lie are anxiously watching Russia and waiting for the “consecration” so we may see her ‘conversion’.”

Crimea happens to be part of the region that was the old Jewish kingdom of Khazaria—the middlemen between the Eastern Orthodox kingdom of Bynzantium and Kievan-Rus “Third Rome” in the north.

Above are links to a video of probably the most revealing and rare exposés of the demonic Jewish Kabbalah, which constitutes the core of the New World Order conspiracy—the conspiracy against Christ and His Church. This is an in-depth four-hour series. I have not seen it anywhere else on the web. If you like the above graphic, please share it through social media, email, or other. Please also share the documentary linked below.

In the end, the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it. It was inevitable that they should make that claim sooner or later: the logic of their position demanded it. Not merely the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality, was tacitly denied by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense.
—George Orwell, 1984

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
December 6, 2017 Anno Domini

Mathematics is a truly objective discipline that is not subject to the opinions and value systems of those who seek to impose their world view on others.

Growing up, I hated dealing with math. I could not wrap my mind around its technical, rigid, and seemingly complex systems. But that’s just my mind. I am inclined towards linguistics and writing, which is why I maintain this blog. But what I respect most about math is its objectivity and application of logical thinking.

Math provides just the raw facts: here they are, like them or not; no whining; no complaining; no crying about intolerance, bigotry, or hate; no bending the truth to fit your oxymoronic notions of “alternative facts”. This is the truth. Critical thinking required. Law of non-Contradiction in effect.

Aside from modern abstract ideas of math like fuzzy logic or multi-valued systems, the fundamentals of mathematics have stood the test of time as immutable truth, for math exists within the ordered and complex creation of a prime Creator…there it is. Mathematics—when sincerely drawn to its ultimate end—points directly to the existence of our creator and to the beauty within Himself and His creation. The Golden Ratio (used in the design of the human face) is one small example of creative beauty pointed to by mathematics.

Perhaps, then, this is why the Jewish-masonic social engineers, through operations like the United Nations’ Common Core, have come to attack the last bastion of objective truth that is taught in the education systems across the world. They have already removed honest study of religion from the system. Now they must remove the teaching of logic-based math—a science that naturally leads sincere students to religious conclusions. Logic and critical thinking have long been removed from the world education system. This explains why not only literacy rates but also mathematics comprehension rates are plummeting, mostly in the West. Most people don’t even know what the Trivium is. Math is the last discipline of objective truth slated for removal by the social engineers. It cannot be allowed to be taught anymore, as it conflicts with the post-truth world agenda. Only lies, contradiction, and nonsense are permitted. Feelings, passion, and gratification are all we need—forget about truth and beauty. The cult of ugly, in all its decay, shall prevail.

So it is that fundamental math is now being replaced, at best, by fuzzy logic and, at worst, absurd formulaic gibberish like that used in the Common Core agenda. Get the kids while they’re young. Retard their minds from learning to think critically and you will have a completely plasticized brain with which to mold into whatever you wish: a slave…an automaton…a creature alienated from his creator.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

Regardless of if those who call themselves “Jews” today are indeed the descendants of Abraham, they are behaving in the spirit of the ancients who rejected Christ.

That is what matters most. People who obsess on the racial heritage of today’s Jews are missing the bigger picture. However, there is some value to the racial heritage question on a secular level. For example, if today’s Jews are not descendants of Abraham, how then can they, according to the Zionist view, justifiably claim a Biblical right to Palestine? But the focus of this article will be the Khazar theory as scapegoat for Jews and their anti-Christian behaviour.

Much of the confusion, present mainly in Protestant circles, is caused by a misunderstanding of Jesus words found in Saint John’s Apocalypse, chapter 2, verse 9.

I know thy tribulation and thy poverty, but thou art rich: and thou art blasphemed by them that say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

The confused are rendering this passage carnally, saying that Jesus was singling out only “fake Jews” as the synagogue of Satan but not the true descendants of Abraham. The root cause of this confusion stems from the heresy of dual covenant theology, which states that Jews are saved based on their race alone, not on their faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. The truth of the matter is that Jesus was speaking of the spiritual bankruptcy of ethnic Jews.

Khazars didn’t exist when Jesus spoke against the Synagogue of Satan
The Khazar Empire, a medieval power that lay just north of the theocratic Christian Byzantium Empire, is believed to have been established around the 7^th century A.D., several hundred years after Christ walked the Earth. During the 8^th century, many of its nobles converted to Judaism. It is believed that many or most of today’s European (Ashkenazi) Jews are descended from this Turkish Khazar tribe. How is it, then, that Jesus could have been referring to these supposed “fake” Khazar Jews in His admonishment of the Synagogue of Satan throughout the Gospels? Were the Jews to whom He spoke indeed the literal descendants of Abraham? The answer is unequivocally, yes. In almost all of Jesus’ discourse with the Zionist Jews of His time, he focused on their spiritual blindness, not on their supposed racial legitimacy. In the following passage, Jesus makes it clear that the faithful spirit that was present with Abraham, not ethnicity, is what counts. The following passage also proves that Jesus did not view the Synagogue of Satan as Khazar Jews.

I know that you are the children of Abraham: but you seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you. I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and you do the things that you have seen with your father. They answered, and said to him: Abraham is our father. Jesus saith to them: If you be the children of Abraham, do the works of Abraham. But now you seek to kill me, a man who have spoken the truth to you, which I have heard of God. This Abraham did not. You do the works of your father. They said therefore to him: We are not born of fornication: we have one Father, even God.
Jesus therefore said to them: If God were your Father, you would indeed love me. For from God I proceeded, and came; for I came not of myself, but he sent me: Why do you not know my speech? Because you cannot hear my word. (John 8:37-43)

Jesus then exposes the true source of their spirit.

You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and he stood not in the truth; because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof. (John 8:44)

The consistent message in the New Testament is that one’s spirit towards Christ will determine his ultimate destiny, heaven or hell…to be reborn of the Spirit or to remain in the spirit of bondage to sin. There is no way of carnalizing the Gospels and making them about heritage or ethnicity.

The terms “Jew” and “Israel” were redefined by Christ’s coming
Adding to the confusion of the identity of the Synagogue of Satan is the definition of the term “Jew” in the Bible. In the New Testament, there are instances where Jew refers to a racial/national group and other instances where Jews are referred to as a spiritual group. Still yet, Jews are also referred to as an adversarial group, summed up in the term “Synagogue of Satan” and hinted at in passages like “they hid for fear of the Jews.” So how are we to determine what “Jew” means? Historian E. Michael Jones has a solid grasp of the variation in application of the term “Jew.”

When St. John uses the words “oi Ioudaioi,” he is referring to a group that has rejected Christ. The coming of Christ changed Jewish identity forever, something the Jews at His time comprehended only with difficulty. From then, the terms “Israelite” and “Jew” were no longer synonyms, because, Ferdinand Hahn points out in Caron’s book, “the true Israelites” from the Christian perspective “are precisely those who, like Nathaniel, recognize Jesus as the Messiah.

—E. Michael Jones, “The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and its Impact on World History”, Fidelity Press, South Bend, Indiana, 2008, p. 33-34

Upon Christ’s arrival…the situation changes, for the Jews have to accept Christ to remain Israel…John uses the term “Jew” two ways. He begins by saying that “Salvation comes from the Jews,” and ends by saying those who call themselves “Jews” are not children of Abraham or Moses and, in fact, have Satan as their father. From identifying the word Jew with “we,” as he does with the Samaritan woman, Jesus goes on to refer to what John calls “Jews” as “you,” which is to say, a group that does not include Jesus. Accepting or rejecting the Messiah becomes the principal way of defining what it means to be a Jew. (p. 36)

In other words, the true meaning of what it means to be a Jew has to do with the spirit that was present with Abraham. By rejecting Christ, the Jews also rejected Abraham, for the Spirit of Christ was with Abraham. However, now, the term “Jew” has been redefined as a rejecter of Christ, regardless of ethnicity; for the Jews, in their rejection of Christ, accepted Satan as their father.

There is neither Jew nor Greek: there is neither bond nor free: there is neither male nor female. For you are all one in Christ Jesus. (Galatians 3:28)

One who distinguishes him or herself as Jewish is declaring their rejection of Christ and the spiritual redefinition of God’s people in the above passage from Galatians. Israel is the spiritual body of Christ, composed of the faithful, from all races. Spiritual Israel and the Church are one and the same. Fleshly Israel has been put away.

That because the rebellious Israel had played the harlot, I had put her away, and had given her a bill of divorce: yet her treacherous sister Juda was not afraid, but went and played the harlot also herself. (Jeremiah 3:8)

Scapegoating Jews
Those who continue to advance the lie that Jesus was referring to Khazar Jews when He admonished the Synagogue of Satan are not only guilty of falsifying history but also of excusing ethnic Jews of their rejection of Jesus the Messiah. There can be no excuse for a Jew, or anyone, who rejects Jesus. In a religious and spiritual context, the Khazar debate is irrelevant. There is no validity in the dichotomy of “fake Jews” vs. “real Jews” outside of St. John’s definition of “Jews”.  And Jewish behaviour today cannot be excused away as being the rotten fruits of Turkish impostors. Jewish behaviour today is no different than it was 2,000 years ago when the Jews cried for the release of the criminal Barabbas over Jesus and for Herod to crucify the Messiah. The likely reason why some push the Khazar theory is in a cowardice attempt to avoid being labelled a racist or anti-Semite whilst implicating “Khazars” in crimes and conspiracy.

Yet no man spoke openly of Him, for fear of the Jews. (John 7:13)

Another group advocating the Khazar scapegoat are British Israelists (Christian Identity) and some white nationalists. Under the same spiritual blindness as Jews, this group rationalizes that if they can make today’s Jews out to be racial impostors of the ancient Hebrews, they themselves will inherit the birthright or, a more extreme view, they are the true descendants of the Hebrews. The latter view has its roots in the millenarianist heresy that plagued England during the Protestant Reformation.

More disturbing, perhaps, is the fact that many evangelical Christians embrace the Khazar scapegoat, in an attempt to deify the Jews. To avoid implicating their god race in the world conspiracy—on the rare occasion when they actually admit a world conspiracy exists—these Christian Zionists dismiss it as being merely the work of the Khazar tribe, not “true Jews”. What they are saying then is that “true” racial Jews are racially incapable of sin, racially incapable of being the conspirators leading the New World Order. Of course, this is completely absurd and completely contrary to the basic tenets of Christianity. This belief is more in line with something from the Third Reich than the Bible.

Genealogical records destroyed along with the Temple
It is next to impossible to argue that destruction of Jerusalem, the Temple, and the slaughter of one million Jews (according to Titus Flavius Josephus) in 70 AD was not the work of God that brought the Old Covenant to fulfillment as well as prophet Daniel’s Seventy Weeks prophecy. But also destroyed by divine will were all genealogical records of the ancient Hebrews. This is not only a major problem for racialists today, it is further evidence of the deeper spiritual truth behind the chosen-people archetype. If God intended for a small Hebrew tribe to rule the world for eternity, surely He would have kept in tact proof of this tribe’s racial authenticity. But since this was not the case, the loss of the Temple records is further evidence that God’s intention from the beginning was a faithful universal people unto Him, with the ancient Hebrew era serving as a mere type of bigger things to come. Saint Paul drives this home in his instruction to Timothy:

As I desired thee to remain at Ephesus when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some not to teach otherwise, not to give heed to fables and endless genealogies: which furnish questions rather than the edification of God, which is in faith.  (1Timothy 1:3-4)

The credibility of the infamous Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, an intricate and ingenious hundred-year-old blueprint for global domination, has stood the test of time against dismissive and deceitful charges.

Because of its implication of the Jewish money power, naturally, it has incurred the wrath of the Jewish-controlled press, academia, pseudo historians, heretics, and political pundits. It has been called everything from an anti-Semitic forgery written by the Russian secret police to a Vatican-shadow-written libel against Jewry. While these charges have little to no evidence, little has been said about its highly elaborate scheming and cunning word play.
It’s comparable to almost any classic work in its imagination and mastery of plot. Works of such reputation are typically considered divinely inspired or of the vaporous odours from the bowels of hell.  The occult has worked through the medium of drama and literature for millennia, Shakespeare’s (kabbalist Sir Francis Bacon?) The Tempest, for example. On the other hand, pen and the stage have brought us messages from the divine, that is, from God, the Logos; the Holy Bible is the premier example. Christopher Marlowe’s exposition on the British Judeo-Masonic cryptocracy, Doctor Faustus, and Johann Andreas Eisenmenger’s stunning 17^th century exposé of Judaism in Entdektes Judentum are just a couple of other example with regards to divine defense against the Judeo-Masonic plot. In modern times, the transparency of the threatre is even more apparent with today’s far less sophisticated forms of drama and writing.

Are the Protocols the work of genius Jewish minds?
Jews often boast of their supposed intelligence, and their lapdogs in the Evangelical Protestant pulpit do also. But just how smart are they? Could they have written the diabolically ingenious Protocols? Historically, the Jewish conspirators against Christ and His Church have been cabbalists, that is, practitioners of magic and divination, according to the Jewish unholy book, the Kabbalah, which is more revered than the Old Testament in Judaism. White magicians attempt to distort the devilry of their craft by claiming that they only summon good angels through their incantations. But the Church has always taught that if one summons spirits, regardless of intending to summon ‘good’ spirits, only evil spirits will manifest. Thus, is it unreasonable to conclude that anti-Christ Jews plotting the overthrown of the Christian Church in England, Europe, and Russia throughout history and especially during the time of the writing of the Protocols were guided by dark spirits—those whom they regularly summon up through their sorcery and wicked rituals?  This would make a lot of sense, because angels, even fallen ones, have knowledge far greater than men. And where there is superior knowledge, there is power, and this power is used to control others (Gnosticism and Freemasonry). For all we know, Sir Isaac Newton, a Jewish kabbalist and alchemist, could have received his scientific knowledge from the spirits he regularly conversed with. We do know that his mechanistic bias provided the foundation for the Jewish-Masonic Enlightenment and still lingers today in the form of modernism, materialism, and so-called skepticism. And what of all the other supposed great Jewish minds credited with bringing knowledge and innovation to the world? Where this knowledge hasn’t been outright stolen and forged from others, could they, too, have merely passed on what was relayed to them by their dark spirits?

With God inspiring the Holy Bible, Lucifer and his fallen angels answered back by inspiring the Babylonian Talmud, the Jewish Kabbalah, and blueprints like the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.

1Thessalonians 2:15 The Jews…who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

Are the Jews capable of carrying out a 2,000-year plan all by themselves?
How is it that one group of people have, for generations, kept the plan outlined in the Protocols of Zion going on all these years? How have individual conspirators been able to contribute to it through the narrow vision of only one generation, which is about 70 years at best? It would take a great deal of vision, unification, and determination to carry out such an ambitious plot. Or perhaps, like the inspiration for the Protocols, the same dark spirits have guided the Jews as they execute every jot and tittle of the Protocols. The Protocols, published in 1905, work in two directions: they sum up history at the start of the Jewish-Masonic Enlightenment and French Revolution to the then-future Russian Revolution. But beyond that, the Protocols outline a plot that is completely consistent with the Jewish revolutionary spirit, which began as far back as the Pharisees who screamed for the crucifixion of our Lord Jesus Christ almost 2,000 years ago. Since Jesus’ coming, the Jews have worked tirelessly in attempting to overthrow His influence over the world. In truth, the Protocols are really only a snippet of their war strategy against Christ and His saints. If God ceased leading the Jews following the the sealing of the Old Covenant at the death of Christ, who is leading them now? Could it be that the elders of Zion acted as channellers of the Protocols, mediums for Satanic spirits?

In the Middle Ages, demonic interaction with mankind was widely known, thanks to the Church’s divine influence in the world. Today, due in part to Newton and his anti-spirit influence, angels and demons have been but completely forgotten. And this has aided the cryptocracy’s hold over mankind, for fallen angels are the hidden power behind world events today; they are the hidden power behind the Jewish-Masonic plot. The Book of Genesis as well as the non-canonical Book of Enoch seem to go so far as blaming the fallen angels for the fall of mankind…for all evil on Earth. Men seek these fallen angels out for knowledge in the hopes of using that knowledge to have power over others and to gratify their passions—a Faustian tradeoff.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
January 19, 2014 Anno Domini

There is much appeal to the so-called sovereign, or freeman on the land, movement. It shows its adherents that there is a vast monetary conspiracy which holds the citizens of the planet in perpetual bondage and that there is a procedure to remove oneself from this.

While it is true that there is a global conspiracy ruled by money, the sovereign movement, which has its roots in the WASP establishment, doesn’t stop there and eventually takes its followers down a path of deception and ruin.

For years, I held back on advocating for or against this sovereign movement, with the intention of giving it time to prove itself. It has failed miserably and ruined the lives of many well meaning people. How sincere persons fall for this deception is apparent in the near-truth appeal of the freemen on the land. Yes, there is a global economic conspiracy. Yes, there is no law in the United States that requires one to pay income tax. Yes, the common law is a suitable law for a civilized society. But it is foolish to think, as the movement’s adherents do, that one can escape this monetary matrix simply by writing a series of homemade letters to state officials and the Queen of England or arranging words in such a way as to declare independence from the system when facing a magistrate.

The sovereign citizens movement claims that the conspiracy is based in Universal Commercial Code (UCC) or that we, as artificial corporate entities called ‘persons’, are actually governed by Maritime admiralty law (the law of the seas). The fact that our names are written in all upper case letters on government documents is the alleged proof that we are merely corporate instruments traded within the UCC system. While these codes certainly allow for control of good and services as well as people, they are not the root of the conspiracy. And publicly declaring oneself independent of this system has no effect whatsoever, as has been proven by the repeated failures in the courts by sovereigns. Afterall, the lawmakers and their interpreters (lawyers) can get away with interpreting laws in any way they see fit. The Bible declares that the love of money is the root of all evil. Evil…is at the root of the monetary conspiracy. The only way to declare oneself independent of this evil system dominated by monetary instruments is to repent of ones sins and follow Christ, who is the liberator of mankind from the bondage of sin.
The sovereign movement offers an illusory salvation through its system, which is based on letter writing and language manipulation. Sovereigns are doomed to a life of, at worst, jail time or, at best, a life of constant fighting to declare oneself independent. Spend enough time around a sovereign and you will see that much of their time is taken up by summons to court or learning the latest letter-writing technique (there is always “new light” to be learned since their methods always fail in a court of law). Adherents are always kept in a state of delusion. When they inevitably fail to convince a judge of their independence from admiralty law, they are comforted by another sovereign and advised that they simply didn’t use the right combination of words to secretly tip off the judge as to the sovereign’s true freedom.

The sovereigns point out that the City of London is a separate corporate entity. They claim that the UCC law, under which every man and woman is supposedly enslaved, is run by the British Crown in conjunction with the Vatican. Much of this speculation is fueled by Jewish disinformation of a Vatican/Catholic world conspiracy. This is a strategic deflection carefully crafted by the Elders of Zion. The Crown is certainly a big part of the world conspiracy, but remember that Jewry took over England shortly after Henry VIII’s bastard daughter Elizabeth and her court astrologer John Dee cast a spell over England, allowing for all kinds of evil to flourish. England became the new Jerusalem to the Zionist millennialists. And while the Vatican has become corrupt, especially since the Second Vatican Council, it is not a key player in the world conspiracy. The function of the now Jewish- and homosexual-infiltrated Vatican is to water down the Christian faith, to modernize and scandalize it. In reality, Talmudic Judaism and its money-changing disciples are the masters of money on Earth. They are headquartered in London, New York, and in other places and are not limited by the incorporation of cities, municipalities, or persons. They are not limited by codes or laws, and especially not letters of declaration (sovereign’s supposed claim of right) or language manipulation. The world’s modern courts system, based on interpretation and legalism, resembles something based in the Jewish Talmud and Kabbalah (the late Eustace Mullins makes some plausible claims about the courts and Kabbalah; Michael Hoffman, in Judaism Discovered, makes clear connections between the modern legal system and the Talmud). The British Crown can only be an extension of this kabbalistic system. It’s certainly no secret that most judges are Freemasons—Freemasonry being a Britishized from of Jewish cabalism. A branch of the sovereign movement called the redemptionist movement, founded by Roger Elvick, touches on the Jewish aspect of the usury/debt slave system, but fails to see its spiritual relationship: that we are enslaved by evil men (led mainly by Jews) through usury and debt but that our own personal sin and abandonment of God makes this enslavement possible, not our lack of knowledge of techniques and procedures.

If true liberation from bondage comes from knowing Jesus Christ, then the freeman movement is not only providing a false solution to the problem of bondage and slavery, it is affirming it by diverting its followers form the real answer. So delusional are the sovereigns, they naively believe that we were somehow free when only the common law existed, even though usury and sin still prevailed. Considering the sovereign’s unconscious affirmation of slavery and bondage, it’s no surprise that many sovereigns take their “enlightenment” to extremes, like using their letter procedures and statements of claim to get out of paying bills, everything from utilities to cable and phone. The rotten fruits of their deception finally evolves from its pseudo-liberating theology to outright theft.

Another rotten fruit exhibited by sovereigns, and as indicated by the Freeman society logo above, is their new age, communitarian tendencies. To justify their theft, sovereigns will often claim that no one holds ownership over anything (Judeo-Masonic goal of abolition of private property); therefore, everything is for the taking for the sovereign. Many sovereigns will use Christian-like language in order to deceive new recruits of their benevolent motive. They will mix it in with new age concepts of oneness and mother earth. Is it any surprise that Zionist shill and occultist Jordan Maxwell is a leading advocate of the sovereign movement?

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
May 5, 2013 Anno Domini

There are conspiracy theories aplenty related to phenomena like unidentified flying objects, the alleged existence of extraterrestrial beings, and crop circles. But none of the theorists behind them, especially the cartoonish ancient astronaut theorist David Icke, seem to make the obvious connection to the Judeo-Masonic plot, much less explain what their purpose is.

Firstly, here is a series of photos that will begin to illustrate this connection.

Enough for you? How about these:

There are many more examples like these.

Kabbalistic alchemical transformation through alien agenda

So, what does it all mean? Well, for years, the entertainment industry and the technocrats have been inundating us with UFO, ET, and robotic themes in order to prepare us for their endgame transformation. This delusion seems to be that eventually, we are going to be told or realize that ETs (aliens) are simply more evolved humans that have been trying to send messages to us and enlighten us.
This has come to be known as the ancient astronaut hypothesis, advocated by crackpots such as Erich von Däniken, Zecharia Sitchin, and so-called conspiracy researcher David Icke, who even advocates the Kabbalist concept of a holographic universe.  Messages from these “ancient astronauts” are contained in the form of mysterious crop markings (circles), as pictured above, or encounters with beings (alien abductions, angelic visitations). The complete externalization of the ancient astronaut hypothesis onto the masses will be the culmination of the Kabbalah-based scientific dictatorship’s alchemical transformation of mankind, a sort of transformation of everyone into the trans-humanist Jewish Golem character. This scenario is also the goal in Freemasonry, the New Age movement, and Theosophical groups. The Raelians and Scientologists believe that ET beings actually created us through genetic engineering. Virtually all occult groups agree in their trans-humanist goal for mankind, which is really just about establishing a greater system of control over slaves, not about enhancing and extending our lives as they claim.

The Raelians believe aliens—the Elohim from the Bible, they claim—created us and that Jesus, Buddha, and others are mere prophets. In addition to being strong proponents of radical leftist ideals (a communist Jewish invention), the Raelians, and even the Scientologists, are technocrats, which is a major component of the Judeo-Masonic Illuminati conspiracy. They believe that technology and things like genetic engineering have been passed down to us from our alien ancestors in order to help us evolve. The Book of Enoch and portions of the Bible tell a similar story; however, the so-called aliens passing down technology are actually fallen angels in Satan’s service. The Raelians’ use of the Hebrew rendering of God in the Book of Genesis, from which they arrive at their theological conclusion, is inconsistent. The Pharisaic Masoretic text (Kabbalah-inspired modern Hebrew translation of the Old Testament) tends to support their claim that God is considered a plurality of beings (Elohim), while other sources, like the much older and reliable Greek Septuagint translation of the Old Testament, reveal God as a singular being (Yachid or Echad, in the Hebrew). The former fits their scenario that god, or the beginning of evolution, is a group of alien beings. Other Biblical scholars claim that the seeming plurality of God in the Bible is a reference to His Kingdom or majesty and not to a plurality of beings. Regardless, the Raelians must use the Kabbalist-inspired rendering, because the true Biblical definitions do not fit their ancient astronaut story. For the last few years, the History Channel’s Ancient Aliens series has been perpetuating the ancient astronaut hypothesis.

Kabbalistic themes in alien abduction scenarios

Whether or not alien abductions are real, the claims of alleged abductees is important when trying to decipher the true source of the alien agenda. Whether it’s aliens telepathically warning their abductees of impending earthly disasters due to mankind’s activity (sounds like UN Agenda 21 propaganda, doesn’t it?) or giving them some sort of mystical universal enlightenment, it’s all harmonious with Kabbblah (Jewish magic). In magic, the witch of wizard is endowed with secret knowledge and special powers that enable him or her to manipulate matter, or to do as though wilt, the fundamental doctrine of Satanism and the occult. One interesting UFO encounter claim involved US Air Force Sergeants James Penniston and John Burroughs, who, upon investigating a UFO report in Rendlesham Forest in Suffolk, England in 1980, encountered a craft that infused them with a hidden message through binary code.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpYQ-3-pU5g]

In Kabbalah, the universe is considered to be entirely numeric in nature, similar to what the character Neo discovers about reality in the movie The Matrix. In this Kabbalist universe, a magician can take on divine powers by tapping into this numerical system (gematria) or by reciting Hebraic letters or words, like the Tetragrammaton (also sourced in the Kabbalah-inspired Masoretic text). If Penniston wasn’t already involved in the occult in some manner, his experience was his first initiation.

Ancient astronauts’ trans-humanist destiny for mankind a feeble imitation of Jesus Christ’s Kingdom
This conspiracy against Christ and His Church hopes to hoodwink the masses using technological tricks, what the Bible calls “lying signs and wonders,” aided by fallen angels hell bent on dragging humans down with them into the pits of the abyss. Like in Freemasonry, where initiates are promised illumination if only they pledge their allegiance to the brotherhood and work their way through the degrees, the human population is being lured into this final alchemical transformation, promised the secrets of the universe and life extension through trans-humanist evolution. It’s Satan’s feeble attempt at duplicating Christ’s promise of eternal life through salvation in Him alone.
And since Jews have nationally rejected Jesus Christ, they have championed the Satanic trans-humanist agenda and are directing it today. They jealously and naively belief that through their alien-inspired technology, they can harness the creative powers reserved for God. While Jews and their Masonic Noahides get to transform into divine beings, they transform us goyim into their Golem servants—what they mistakenly expected the Messiah to do. In effect, they have declared themselves to be their own Messiah.

A Christmas Prayer

“I should be able to express moral views on social issues,” he told ABC news following the Piers Morgan show, “especially those that have been the underpinning of Western civilization for 2,000 years — without being slandered, accused of hate speech, and told from those who preach ‘tolerance’ that I need to either bend my beliefs to their moral standards or be silent when I’m in the public square.”

The ensuing smear campaign on Cameron can only have been engineered by the likes of GLAAD, which bears a striking similarity to the Jewish supremacist organization, the Anti-Defamation League, in name and in objective (see list of prominent Zionist Jews in the homosexual lobby below).

Zionist Jews occupy top spots in homosexual, abortion, pedophilia, and sexual liberation lobbies

Larry Kramer — co-founder of “Act Up,” a homosexual/AIDS activist organization; co-founder of the Gay Men’s Health Crisis
Alan Klein — co-founder of group ACT UP, co-founder of group Queer Nation, National Communications Director and chief spokesperson for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD]. Klein also co-founded the successful multimedia campaign STOPDRLAURA.COM
Arnie Kantrowitz — co-founder of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
Jonathan D. Katz — founded and chairs the Harvey Milk Institute, the largest queer studies institute in the world. A long time queer political activist, was a co-founder of Queer Nation, [the key San Francisco branch].
Harvey Fierstein — film actor [Mrs. Doubtfire]; well-known gay activist.
Moisés Kaufman — playwright and film director [The Laramie Project].
Israel Fishman — founder of the Gay Liberation Caucus in 1970 [now known as the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered Round Table of the American Library Association], the world’s first gay professional organization.
Bella Abzug and Edward Koch — both Jewish — the first members of the U.S. House of Representatives to introduce legislation banning discrimination based on sexual orientation [1974].
Winnie Stachelberg — political director, Human Rights Campaign [HRC]
Michael S. Aronowitz, The New York Log Cabin Republicans.
Tony Kushner — gay activist; Tony and 1993 Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright [for Angels in America, 1992].
Len Hirsch — president of the GLBT federal government employees group, GLOBE.
Meg Moritz, Ph.D. — a Director and member of the Executive Committee of GLAAD.
Barbara Raab — an NBC-TV producer; a “Jewish lesbian feminist journalist, writer.”
Charles Kaiser [?] — author & founding member of National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA].
David Goodstein — owner/publisher of the gay magazine The Advocate [1975-1985]; co-founder of the National Gay Rights Lobby.
Judy Wieder — Editor-in-chief, The Advocate gay magazine.
Alison Bechdel [?] — cartoonist creator and author of the bi-weekly comic strip “Dykes to Watch Out For.”
Kevin Koffler — Editor-in-chief, Genre gay magazine.
Garrett Glaser — National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA] national board member.
Ronald Gold — reporter for Variety; a leader in the fight to overturn the American Psychiatric Association’s policy that homosexuality is an illness.
Magnus Hirschfeld [d. 1935], early gay rights activist in Germany; founded one of the first gay rights organizations, the Scientific Humanitarian Committee; coined the term “transvestism”; fled Nazi Germany.
Fred Hochberg — deputy administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration; co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign [HRC].
Michael Berman — member, Human Rights Campaign Board of Directors. Mitchell Gold — HRC Board Marty Lieberman — HRC Board Andy Linsky — HRC Board Dana Perlman — HRC Board Abby Rubenfeld — HRC Board Andrew Tobias — HRC Board Lara Schwartz — Senior Counsel, HRC Heather Wellman — HRC Field Coordinator Dan Furmansky — HRC Senior Field Organizer, West Sally Green — HRC Associate Field Director
Rick Rosendall [?] — President, Gay & Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington, DC.
Barney Frank — member of U.S. Congress; helped create non-discriminatory employment policies in all U.S. federal agencies
Kerry Lobel — executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
Robin Margolis, American coordinator of the Bi Women’s Cultural Alliance and author [Bisexuality: A Practical Guide].
Evan Wolfson, Senior Staff Attorney, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund — and — the executive director of Freedom to Marry.
Jennifer Einhorn — Communications Director, Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD] Nancy Alpert [?] — Treasurer, GLAAD Judy Gluckstern — Board of Directors, GLAAD. Stephen M. Jacoby — Board of Directors, GLAAD. Matt Riklin — Board, GLAAD Carol Rosenfeld — Board, GLAAD. William Weinberger — Board, GLAAD Tanya Wexler — Board, GLAAD. David Huebner — GLAAD Counsel.
Richard Goldstein — Village Voice writer on gay culture and politics
Ron Schlittler — Director of Field & Policy, Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays [PFLAG].
Craig Ziskin — Deputy Director of Development, PFLAG.
Debra Weill — Senior Field & Policy Coordinator, PFLAG.
Dody Goldstein — Board of Directors, PFLAG.
David Horowitz — Board of Directors, PFLAG.
Shawn Frank — Board of Directors, PFLAG.
Leon Weinstein — Chair, Nominating Committee, PFLAG.
Kate Kendell [?], National Center for Lesbian Rights.
Gayle Rubin — lesbian author/activist.
Hilary Rosen — a founding member of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund; former board co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign.
Roz Richter, American attorney and activist.
Bob Kunst — long-time activist in gay and Jewish causes.
“Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network” [GLSEN]. Board co-chairs: Marty Seldman, president
“National Gay & Lesbian Task Force” [NGLTF]. Board co-chairs: ….. Rachel Rosen in Santa Fe, N.M Dave Fleischer — Director of Training [political training], NGLTF. Craig Hoffman — Board of Directors, NGLTF. Beth Zemsky — Board, NGLTF. Marsha C. Botzer — Treasurer, NGLTF. Jeff Levi — first, Levi was NGTF’s lobbyist, early 1980s [NGTF became NGLTF in 1985]. Later, he was NGLTF executive director.
Bill Rubenstein, J.D. ’86, developed the ACLU Lesbian and Gay Rights Project
Martin Duberman — author/historian; founded the Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies at the City University of New York.
Ben Schatz ’81, J.D. ’85, is executive director of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Foundation.
Kevin Schaub, American; Executive Director and Dean of the Harvey Milk Institute in San Francisco, the world’s largest center for queer studies.
Sarah Schulman [1958- ], American playwright, novelist, and activist [one of the founders of the Lesbian Avengers, a direct-action lesbian rights organization].
Susan Spielman — principal/head of Common Ground, an education/consulting firm specializing in workplace sexual orientation education; her company has worked with hundreds of U.S. organizations, helping them to implement domestic partner benefits plans; co-author of the book Straight Talk About Gays in the Workplace.
Gertrude Stein — wrote the first openly lesbian novel, “Q.E.D.,” in 1903, but it was only published posthumously in 1950.
Rikki Streicher (1925-1994), American activist and businesswoman.
Michael Goff — founded Out magazine in 1992.
Paulette Goodman — founder of local chapter [Washington D.C.] of PFLAG and served as President of the National PFLAG organization from 1988-1992.
Jeffrey Newman, American, president and COO of the Gay Financial Network; president and CEO of out.com.
Jim Levin — New York gay historian.
Barrett Brick — GLAA [Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance] Treasurer.
Robin Tyler — American comedian [born Arlene Chernick] who was the first openly gay comic in North America; Tyler is also an activist who was the stage producer for the first three gay marches on Washington and the national protest coordinator for the “Stop Dr. Laura” campaign; she produces women’s comedy and music festivals, and operates a lesbian travel-tour company.
Dr. Bruce Voeller [1935?-1994] [?] American gay rights activist, molecular biologist, physiologist, and AIDS researcher (pioneer in the use of nonoxynol-9 as a spermicide); cofounder and first executive director of the National Gay Task Force; creator of the Mariposa Foundation [an AIDS prevention research organization].
Mark Elderkin [?] — co-founded Gay.com.
Leroy Aarons — American professor, journalist, and founder of the National Gay and Lesbian Journalists Association (1990).
Dr. Donald I. Abrams — American physician, HIV expert, medical marijuana researcher, and past president of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association.
Johnny Abush (1952-2000) — [Canadian]; archivist of the International Jewish GBLT Archives.
Roberta Achtenberg [1950- ]; civil rights lawyer and federal official; appointed as Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity by President Bill Clinton in 1993.
Miriam Ben-Shalom [1948- ], American Army Reserves drill sergeant and gay activist; in 1986 she won a ten-year legal battle with the Reserves when a court ordered her reinstatement; founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Veterans Association [GLBVA] in 1990, serving as its first president.
Larry Brinkin, American gay activist who brought the first domestic partnership lawsuit [against Southern Pacific Railroad, 1982].
Rob Eichberg, American psychologist, co-creator of National Coming Out Day [October 11th].
Scott Evertz, American; in April 2001, President Bush appointed him to serve as the Director of the White House Office of National AIDS Policy [ONAP].
Gene Falk [?, Jewish name], American business executive; Senior Vice President of the Showtime Digital Media Group; part of the team that launched and marketed the U.S. TV series Queer as Folk; Chair of the Board of Directors of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
Surina Kahn — American lesbian activist.
Larry Kessler — founding director in 1983 of the AIDS Action Committee of Massachusetts, the largest AIDS support organization in New England.
Kathy Levinson — American investor and philanthropist; serves on the board of PlanetOut; also on NGLTF Board of Directors.
Judith Light — actress, activist for gay causes.
David Mixner — gay activist, political consultant; co-founder of the Municipal Elections Committee of Los Angeles [MECLA], a group of wealthy gays and lesbians who became influential in local politics; president Bill Clinton’s Special Liaison to the Gay-Lesbian Community.
Dan Savage — American author of gay-themed books [The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant; Skipping Towards Gomorrah: The Seven Deadly Sins and the Pursuit of Happiness in America] and gay-themed- sex-advice columnist [Savage Love].
Susan Schuman, American executive vice-president and general manager of the Planet Out gay and lesbian online service.
Scott Seomin, American entertainment media coordinator for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
Jason Serinus [Jay Guy Nassberg] — founder and coordinator of the Lavender Healing Network; a former gay activist with the New York chapter of the Gay Liberation Front.
David Sine [?] — American CEO of C1TV, the first U.S. gay and lesbian cable TV network.
Rex Wockner — longtime gay, American journalist who has reported news for the gay press since 1985.
Jack Fritscher — became Editor in Chief of Drummer gay magazine [1977].
Leslie Feinberg [1949- ], American trade unionist, transgender activist and author [Transgender Warriors: Making History from Joan of Arc to RuPaul].
Allan Ginsburg – late Jewish poet and leading member of North American Man Boy Love Association
The trailer to Cameron’s film Monumental 
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuN86qIqfw0&w=560&h=315]
Related:
Kirk Cameron calls Zionist Hollywood ‘pornogaphers,’ yet he still dances to Israel’s tune
http://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2012/02/10/kirk-cameron-calls-zionist-hollywood-pornogaphers-yet-he-still-dances-to-israels-tune/