By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 22, 2022 Anno Domini

One factor in late U.S. Senator John Tower’s lost bid for Secretary of Defense was due to his alleged sexual compromise by a Soviet “sparrow”.

The United States Senate rejected Tower’s nomination for U.S. Secretary of Defense by 53-47 votes in 1989 after an investigation found he was sexually compromised (kompromat) by one or more “swallows” (female KGB sexual operators) while working in Geneva, Switzerland as head of the Soviet-invented Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I), a clever way of “promoting peace” and disarmament but on Soviet terms (meaning only the USSR left with nuclear capability).

According to the Chicago Tribune,

“Defense Secretary-designate John Tower quit the U.S. arms control delegation in Geneva in 1986 after his wife threw him out of their home because he was keeping secretaries as mistresses, according to a U.S. investigator who looked into allegations of wrongdoing in the delegation.”

The report went on to say that Air Force Col. Robert Moser Jr., then a top aide to Tower and other U.S. ambassadors, “supposedly maintained ‘hit lists’ of damaging information on his fellow Geneva delegation members. Moser, Indahl said, had dismissed his illicit affair with a woman with Soviet-bloc links by noting that 14 of his peers—including 13 who were married—were engaged in similar affairs while part of the 100-member U.S. Geneva team.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump is suspected of having been sexually compromised by the Russian state and/or its satellites in the “former” Soviet bloc—the direct result of which is believed to have influenced the decisions he made while serving in the White House.  

In 1989, a photo was taken of Trump alongside Senator Tower, CBS host Mike Wallace, and KGB-Mossad operative Robert Maxwell (late father of Ghislaine Maxwell) on board Maxwell’s yacht, The Lady Ghislaine. Maxwell is believed to have been involved with Jeffrey Epstein and his apparent sexual compromise operation of VIPs using his daughter Ghislaine to procure teenaged girls from the United States, Russia, and Eastern Europe. One of the girls, Maria Farmer, claimed Trump was involved in the Maxwell-Epstein sex ring. Maxwell may have been the ringleader who ensnared both Trump and Tower, eventually using both for neo-Soviet purposes: with Trump, using his business clout and eventual presidency to advance Western-Soviet convergence, and with Tower, to use his clout as a politician to advance the phony disarmament agenda and to provide government access (intelligence, Sandia, high technology, etc.) to Soviet saboteurs and double agents. Tower was involved in the Soviet-Israel PROMIS espionage affair by helping the Jewish KGB operative Robert Maxwell gain access to U.S. nuclear lab Sandia, where the spy penetrated the U.S. government’s most sensitive area with Soviet-Israel bugging capabilities. Tower was also involved in the Soviet-Israel-orchestrated Iran Contra Affair. 

Late Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn wrote that the disarmament and world peace effort was a Soviet-invented ruse used to render the West completely vulnerable to Soviet nuclear blackmail, which would result in Soviet-Western convergence and eventual world government.

“My assessment is that, when the long-range strategy was worked out and adopted in the period 1958-60, the Soviets and Chinese agreed to plan and prepare for the eventual reform and liberalisation of their regimes while, in the meantime, following different paths,” Golitsyn writes in The Perestroika Deception (1995). “Liberalisation formed part of the strategic design of procuring the disarmament of the West and the convergence of the Communist and Eastern systems on Communist terms.

…

“In his predictions made in 1967, Sakharov said that ‘restructuring’, disarmament, socialist convergence and the creation of a World Government could be complete by the year 2000. His timetable may have slipped a bit but, given Western ignorance of Soviet strategy and the West’s erroneous response to Gorbachev, the worst may happen.”

The disgraced Tower died in 1991 in a somewhat mysterious plane crash with his family, the same year as the fake collapse of communism was orchestrated and the beginning of the end for the free world.

By Natalie Grant

Moscow State Manager

A major Moscow-directed hoax of the 1950s was the “Peace Movement”. The Moscow regime, expert in political deception, following attentively Western opinion, which it then uses as a foundation to spread disinformation. Concern by some people in the free world over any particular development which might threaten their well being—fo example, nuclear weapons—is seized upon by Moscow disinformation strategists. By means of selected, slanted, and deceptive data, concerns are gradually transformed into fear. Scared and under considerable stress, the victims of this Moscow game can thus be influenced into accepting policies and taking steps harmful to their own interests—like “disarmament”.

The Soviets took advantage of anti-war sentiments that had developed in the West. They were interested, of course, in promoting peace for their own protection to make Soviet policies more receptive to the public. The main purpose of the “Peace Movement”, stage managed from Moscow since its inception, however, was to spread communist influence throughout the world.

The urge of the Soviet leadership to expand in the West was confirmed by D. Volkogonov, a prominent Soviet official, archivist, and historian. In a speech at The National Archives in Washington, D.C., shortly before his death, Volkogonov admitted that the objective of the men in power in the Soviet Union had always been to gain greater influence in the world at large. Expansion of influence is, therefore, one of the principal purposes of every major Moscow disinformation hoax. Moscow’s methods have not changed.

The environment has replaced peace, as an astute journalist recently remarked. Although “peace” still remains a prominent item on the list of deceitful operations of Soviet leaders, protection of the environment has become the principal took for attack against the West and all it stands for. Protection of the environment may be used as a pretext to adopt a series of measures designed to undermine the industrial base of developed nations. It may also serve to introduce malaise by lower their standard of living and implanting communist “values”.

The modus operandi in organizing the attack against the West via the environment is similar in many respects to methods employed by the organization of the “Peace Movement”. True facts are exaggerated to the extreme with the intention of terrifying rank-and-file citizens, while doubtful evidence is presented as scientifically proven fact.

The set up of the environmental operation, however, is more complex. Instead of one world council representing the entire “Peace Movement”, the environmental extremists (also known as professional environmentalists) fall into two groups. One, a non-governmental organization, is the so-called Earth Council, chaired by Maurice F. Strong, a top-level official of the United Nations. The other group, also an NGO, is linked with Moscow through the Green Cross International, or GCI. Mikhail S. Gorbachev is its chairman and founder.

An early definition of Green Cross International depicts GCI as an American non-governmental organization, a private foundation created in April 1993. It was formed through a merger with another environmental group, known as World Cross International, which existed in Switzerland. The Swiss group had been formed for months prior to the merger. This raises the question as to whether the creation of WCI and its merger with GCI were moves to facilitate the establishment of GCI headquarters in Geneva.

The early description of Green Cross International as American was false. Even while GCI now has a chapter in the United States, GCI is not and was never an American movement.

Global Forum

Green Cross International traces its origin to a group that started out under the somewhat clumsy appelation of “Global Forum for Spiritual and Parliamentary Leaders of Human Survival”, which it abbreviated to Global Forum, using the full name only in official documents. It was formed upon the initiative of Aiko Matsumura, a Japanese activist and now executive co-ordinator of the organization.

Global Forum’s purpose was to establish a dialogue with C. Nobel, founder of Earth Aid Society. It is difficult to determine whether the idea of a dialogue came to Mr. Matsumura from Moscow, which favours dialogues as a tool for infiltration. Mr. Nobel recruited the Rev. James Park Morton, Dean of the Cathedral of St. John the Divine in New York, who arranged to have the first meeting of the group in June 1985 in the Cathedral. Among other things, they discussed a solution to “critical issues”, such as degradation of the environment and the depletion of the Earth’s resources. There were only about a dozen participants. They included, however, prominent figures Angier Biddle Duke, the former chief of protocol in the Kennedy and Johnson administrations, and Congressman James H. Scheuer of New York.

The meeting at the Cathedral was soon followed by a conference in Tarrytown, New York. The Tarrytown meeting had a more numerous audience. In Tarrytown, the question was raised and the motion was approved of holding an international conference in Oxford, England.

Sometime later, Congressman Scheuer visited Moscow. He took along invitations to the conference and handed a few to the office of the President of the Supreme Soviet for transmissions to parliamentarians. Several Soviet officials accepted the invitation and attended the conference. The Soviet delegation was led by Yevgeniy Velikhov, Vice Chairman of the Soviet Academy of Sciences.

The Oxford Conference was well attended, mostly by leaders of non-Christian faiths and indigenous personalities. In addition, there were representatives from Britain (including the Archbishop of Canterbury) and the Netherlands. Among the delegates were Chief Oren R. Lyons and Mother Teresa. There were elections to the Council of Global Forum. Nominated to the Council were a number of religious leaders form non-Christian faiths, as well as Yevgeniy Velikhov.

During the proceedings, the GF leadership announced that their next international conference would take place in Moscow, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Under the circumstances, one wonders whether the Global Forum received assistance from some powerful ally. The international conference in Oxford was a clever move on the part of a practically unknown and questionable group. With the Oxford Conference of 1987, the Global Forum entered the international arena.

The Big Even—The Moscow Conference

The Moscow conference met in January 1990. Cosponsored by the Supreme Soviet of the (then) USSR, the conference had the active support of the Academy of Sciences. All Soviet religious communities were called upon to ensure co-operation of various religious communities. The speakers included the Secretary General of the United Nations and the President of the USSR. Senator Al Gore was also among the speakers. He had by then become a member of the Global Forum Council and had even contributed an article to Shared Vision, the official publication of the Gobal Forum. (1)

The key event was the speech by Mikhail S. Gorbachev, President of the Soviet Union. As it was summarized in Shared Vision, (2) Gorbachev’s speech presented Soviet suggestions on how to respond to an “ecological imperative”. The Soviet recommendations comprised the demand for a nuclear test ban, the establishment of an international environmental monitoring system, the signing of a covenant to protect unique ecological zones, the support of United Nations environmental programs and of the international conference on the environment and development, which was scheduled to meet in June 1992 in Brazil. Gorbachev noted that environmental tragedy could be averted only through international effort.

You should remember that at the time of his speech, Gorbachev was still the President of the Soviet Union and he was expressing the “views” and “suggestions” of the Communist Party Soviet Union, of which he was the leader.

These “suggestions” did not fall on deaf ears. Before long, the activities of Global Forum began to reflect the communist “recommendations”. Indeed, had there been any doubts as to the political stand by certain leaders of Global Forum or Moscow’s attitude toward this barely known group, they were dispelled by events at the Moscow Conference. Intention Soviet interest in the proceedings was obvious.

By 1990, certain leaders of the Global Forum had transformed their group into a communist front and were ready to act upon Soviet “suggestions”. The services they began rendering to international communism were important. In its appeal, Global Forum played on hostility toward certain aspects of Western civilization. Global Forum recruited non-communist environmentalists and placed them under the direct, controlling influence of communists. Naive indigenous peoples, non-Christian religious figures, and a few government officials were the main target. Senator Al Gore may serve as an example. (3)

The First Earth Summit

Meanwhile, the United Nations was embarking on its own program to protect the environment. Leading among the environmentalists at the U.N. was Maurice F. Strong, a multimillionaire with top-level business contacts. In 1972, Maurice Strong acted as Secretary General at the Stockholm Conference (4), which was convented to put the environment on the world agenda.

In 1987, the U.N. World Commission on Environment and Development called for the establishment of a code which would prescribe principal norms for behaviour of states and individuals in matters relating to the Earth. And in June 1992, the U.N. held an international conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, which discussed to a large extent matters connected with “protection” of the environment. Maurice Strong was one of the organizers. In environmental circles, this conference was known as The Earth Summit.

All was not smooth sailing at the first Earth Summit. Heads of state refused to accept some proposals, and arguments were often bitter. Insults were exchanged, and President Bush, who attended the meeting, got his share of comment. Timothy Wirth, a former senator from Colorado, accused him of engaging in “adolescent politics” and looking “silly” for not signing a treaty on biodiversity. (5) Global Forum, for some reason, held a simultaneous conference of environmental parliamentarians in another section of the city. The presence of two similar meetings in Rio de Janeiro led to confusion. Resolutions passed by Global Forum were attributed at times by observers to the United Nations Earth Summit.

The conference of parliamentarians served Global Forum as an opportunity to put into effect Soviet President Gorbachev’s “suggestion” to establish an international monitoring institution to protect the environment. This was accomplished by having the parliamentarians pass unanimously a resolution creating an organization, named International Green Cross, later changed to Green Cross International. According to a GCI press release, Mikhail Gorbachev’s Moscow speech was at the root of Green Cross International’s foundation. He was, therefore, invited to accept the position of founder and chairman of GCI. The formal launching of GCI could not take place at Rio and had to be postponed to a future international conference. That took place in 1993 in Kyoto, Japan. Gorbachev attended the Kyoto conference and accepted the nomination.

Although environmentalist circles were disappointed by the results of the 1992 Earth Summit, it actually proved to be a step forward in their campaign for global “protection” for the environment. The U.N. conference, thus, adopted a program for the coming century. The course of action based off “sustainable development” was set down in a document known as Agenda 21, which was further amplified by meetings in Copenhagen, Cairo, and Beijing.

Agenda 21 is viewed by environmental extremists as a blueprint in “sustainable development”. It was circulated among world leaders who are expected by environmental extremists to implement its provisions. The document is divided into forty chapters, some of which contain, on their face, what appear to be reasonable demands, until those demands are juxtaposed with other chapters (i.e., the chapter on “social justice”) that reflect adherence to blatantly communist doctrines.

The Earth Council

The Earth Council, an international non-governmental organization, also arose as a direct result of the Earth Summit. The probable creator of the Earth Council is its chairman Maurice F. Strong. It states its mission to be the support and “empowerment” of “people” in building a more “secure”, “equitable”, and “sustainable” future. The Council, therefore, aims at strengthening the participation of “equal rights” groups, particularly women, indigenous peoples, and “youth”, in its work. (6) The special focus on the Earth Council is to ensure the “operationalization” of indigenous people, women, and “youth”.

Canadian born, in his sixties, Mr. Strong is a self-made man and has innumerable contacts in highly placed and wealth business circles where he seems to enjoy a good reputation. He admits to holding a “socialist ideology” and has been described by a former UN Deputy Ambassador as a “very dangerous ideologue, way over the Left”. (7) Mr. Strong’s immediate assistance is the Executive Director of the Earth Council, Maximo T. Kalaw. He is said to be an “activist” from the Philippines. Mr Kalaw, who also heads the Earth Council Institute and is the Chairman of the Green Forum of the Philippines, holds some rather bizarre views. For instance, according to Mr. Kalaw, economic society, although the main engine for economic development, does not hold “public interest” as its primary concern and, therefore, its members should not be allowed to be part of public governance. Moscow is represented on the board of the Earth Council by Yevgeniy Velikhov, vice chairman of the Soviet Academy of Sciences.

Since its establishment, the Earth Council has been in close collaboration with Green Cross International. In April, 1994, Maurice Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev met at the Hague and launched an “initiative” for an earth charter. They proposed the signing of the charter, which would, according to its promoters, provide a “new mode of life” based upon radical “principles for the whole of humanity”. Both Strong and Gorbachev viewed The Earth Charter as a priority. In this respect, they seemed to be following the precepts of the UN World Commission on Environment and Development (UNCED). Indeed, in 1987 UNCED had called for the formation of a charter which would prescribe “norms” for states and individuals to maintain life on earth.

In order to produce an “ethical and moral” set of “imperatives”, environmental extremists supported the idea of an earth charter plan to precede its acceptance by a worldwide consultation involving all sectors of society. To reach consensus in a world inhabited by people of totally opposite views is an impossible undertaking. Therefore, “consensus” will be achieved by limiting consultation to individuals and NGOs already favouring the Earth Charter.

Green Cross International

The political line adopted by Green Cross International is that of Mikhail Gorbachev, founder and chairman of GCI, who, appropriately, is its mouthpiece. Of course, as a communist, Gorbachev and the Green Cross will want to install communist “values”. In its pronouncements, Green Cross usually calls for action by leaves untold the action it plans to take. Generalities permeate the statements of GCI—and Gorbachev as well—relating to doctrine and activities. In discussing the aims of his enterprise, Gorbachev calls for a “new civilization”, asserting that neither democracy nor prayers to God can solve the alleged “world crisis”. What is a “new civilization”? He does not explain. Because civilization is usually understood to be cultural and technological development, the qualifying “new” requires interpretation that is (conveniently) not supplied. Gorbachev constantly demands a “change of values” but never specified the values he wants changed, or what should replace them.

In its analysis of the Earth Charter, GCI also follows Gorbachev’s lead. GCI laments that despite repeated efforts, the “international community” has not yet been able to agree on an effective international treaty that would guarantee the “rights of the earth. (8) With the creation of international law, a “slow and tedious process”, GCI suggests greater focusing on “soft law”. (9) Soft law refers to non-binding documents drawn up by special interest groups, that as GCI or The Earth Council, that establish “norms”, hoping they will take on the force of “law” through customary practice. Majority rule and dissent are thereby circumvented. (10) Green Cross International hopes, however, to persuade the government of each country to ratify the Earth Charter in time for its proclamation on 01 January 2000.

The administrative director of Green Cross International is Andreas Eggenberg. He advocates integration of all sectors of society at every level in order to achieve “constructive” overall prevention of and response to disasters. In his opinion, this approach will stabilize the ecological and political “situation” of humanity. (11)

The top figure in Green Cross International remains Mikhail Gorbachev, admitted community by training and conviction. The vice president of GCI is Daniel Goeudevert, a Frenchman, self-made businessman, who occupied prominent positions in the automotive world. He is a member of the Club of Rome and an advisor to the Director General of UNESCO. He also presides over the Economic Council of the Gorbachev Foundation.

The United States chapter of Green Cross International was officially opened by Mikhail Gorbachev during his visit in October 1994. Named “Global Green USA”, it maintains offices in several cities, including New York and Cleveland, Ohio. It also has an office in Washington, D.C., where it is represented by one Paul Walker. The president of the American chapter is one Diane Meyer Simons, whose slogan is “one world, one people”. She apparently intends to use this motto to rally public and political leaders for action and support of Global Green USA. Global Green USA is directed by Hugh Locke, who in his first year of activity concentrated on a campaign against “toxic military waste”. Locke also seems interested in the production of documentary films devoted to leaders of the environmental movement. As are most of his colleagues, Locke is vague in his comments. It is, therefore, difficult to understand what he means when he too calls for the creation of a “new civilization”.

Expansion

Green Cross and Crescent International is now in its fourth year. (Sometimes “Crescent” is addted to the GCI name.) At first glance, it does not seem to have performed any spectacular feat. Its name has never been mentioned during volcanic eruptions, nor does GCI seem to have intervened in saving the victims of extensive floods, nor has it received publicity at the time of oil spills. GCI has been silent on the Three Gorges Dam Project in China, scheduled for completion in 2009, although the project is expected to have a profound ecological, environmental, cultural, archaeological, and historical impact. Yet, rescuing the victims of disasters and protecting ecological zones are in the GCI program. In fact, skeptics argue that so far, GCI has been long on rhetoric and short on action. (12)

Green Cross International, however, has not been idle. It has actively collaborated with UN environmental extremists at numerous meetings and conferences and has taken a leading role in launching the Earth Charter. Gorbachev and his staff have further been seeking and finding support in government circles, particularly in Holland, and have been engaged in expanding GCI into a truly international organization. Barely one year after its establishment, Green Cross and Crescent International had already formed five national chapters. The GCI operates two centres. One is in the Hague, where GCI maintains its programs on “values” education, as well as matters related to the media and communications. The other centre is in Geneva, Switzerland, where GCI handles emergency operations. In addition, the group has chapters in a  number of countries, including Estonia, France, Japan, Korea, the Netherlands (where government circles have donated at least $75,000 to GCI), Sweden, Switzerland, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America.

The Second Earth Summit

In March 1997, five years after the Earth Summit, a conference on environment met in Rio de Janeiro with an attendance of some 500 people. It has been named Rio+5. The participants met in order to review the progress in “sustainable development” made since the Earth Summit and apparently to prepare for the Second Earth Summit.

Rio+5 issued a set of recommendations dealing with the necessity to focus attention on The Earth Charter and to reach a consensus on “values”. The meeting parties stressed the need to strengthen the participation of “equal rights” groups, i.e., women, indigenous peoples, and youth in councils for sustainable development. The emphasis placed by environmental extremists upon “sustainability” raises questions.

Supporters of “sustainability” often disregard the fact that nature is their most dangerous opponent. With one sweep, nature can destroy the most carefully laid plans. The volcano at Montserrat, which transformed a flourishing community into a desert of ash, may serve as an example. The U.N. Second Earth Summit opened its doors in June 1997. Dignitaries from over 160 countries flocked to the meeting in New York City. President Bill Clinton and Vice President Al Gore also attended. The summit reportedly began with “recriminations between Europe and the United States and by Third World countries condemning developed countries for broken promises.” (13) The main points in the discussion concerned aid to developing countries by the West—or rather, by the United States. Another point dealt with the signing of a pact reducing “greenhouse gases” and their emission; a pact specifically designed to cripple what’s left of American industry. This was presented to the conference in Kyoto, Japan, in December 1997. Environmental extremists proclaimed their disappointment with the results of The Second Earth Summit. They failed to note, however, as did herbalist Charles K. Hanley (14) that the environmental movement made progress by “slow bits” over the last four decades.

Conclusion

Information available at the present time seems to show that the environmental extremists maintain contact with and are supported by Moscow. The “movement” has all the traits of a Soviet disinformation operation. Facts are exaggerated into a “nightmarish” picture of floods, scorched earth, disease, and death. The target, the industrialized West—scared and confused by Moscow’s sympathizers in “science”, academe, and the slavishly obedient Establishment media—is influenced to accept measures and regulations harmful to the Western world.

These are not the only consequences of the action of the environmental extremist movement. It is promoting conflict, domestically and internationally. We can only marvel at the skill with which the two top leaders have proven able to introduce dissent and conflict into usually pacific circles.

These two leaders, Maurice Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev, are men of considerable experience. They understand economics and politics. They are, therefore, fully aware of what they are doing. Strong has the power of the United Nations at his disposal. Gorbachev, and able public relations men, gained considerable influence in the period following his retirement from president of the USSR. They are consciously harming the United States.

Who profits from the activities of these two men?

NOTES:

Hillary Clinton opponents, alt right pundits, conspiracy theorists, and members of the “truther” community alike are all still chasing the apparent Stone-rigged dangling carrot in the form of an elaborate, provocative, and seductive conspiracy theory alleging that members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for president are operating an underground child-trafficking ring from a set of Clinton-connected ma-and-pa businesses in Washington D.C., namely from the non-existent basement of a pizza joint called Comet Ping Pong.

The Pizzagate dirty trick—which alleges that Clinton campaigners John and Tony Podesta are the masterminds of the ring, extending to Europe—is based on a conveniently anonymous March 2016 hack of the John Podesta’s emails published on Wikileaks, a suspected CIA/Mossad front. Also convenient was the timing of the publishing of the emails by Wikileaks, on October 7, 2016, just in time for the election. The Pizzagate theory “broke” at the end of October.

Days later, on Oct. 11, Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta told reporters that GOP dirty trickster Roger Stone may have had advanced knowledge of the breach and the subsequent publishing of the emails on Wikileaks.[i]

“I think it is a reasonable assumption—or at least a reasonable conclusion—that Mr. Stone had advance warning and the Trump campaign had advance warning about what [Wikileaks founder Julian] Assange was going to do,” Podesta said. “I think there is a reasonable belief that Mr. Assange may have passed this information on to Mr. Stone.”

Podesta referred to an August 21, 2016 tweet by Stone in which he cryptically warned, “Trust me, it will soon” be “Podesta’s time in the barrel.”[ii]

“Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon also pointed to a interview Stone did in August with Alex Jones’ InfoWars, when he said he had been in touch with Assange through ‘mutual friends.’ In late September and early October, Stone repeatedly touted that Assange would soon release more information on Clinton, both on his Twitter and in another interview with Jones.”[iii]

Stone has denied the suggestion by Podesta; however, Podesta’s claim that Wikileaks timed the release of his emails to cover up the leak of the embarrassing Billy Bush-Trump interview is plausible. Furthermore, it may have been timed to overshadow Trump’s then-pending rape allegation by Katie Johnson[iv], which was tied to convicted child prostitute pimp Jeffrey Epstein, and to distract from Trump’s about face following his election victory, in which he began to refill the swamp with his Goldman Sachs cronies and other villains and shill for the Likud-controlled state of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the international Jewish organized crime syndicate.[v]

The claim that the Podesta emails were hacked by Russia is likely a distraction from the real hackers, who are probably operatives in the CIA, NSA, and Mossad—Wikileaks itself likely being a creation of the CIA and Israeli intelligence. Also, we don’t know that the emails published are legitimate. With Trump and Stone’s deep-state ties, it’s not implausible that Stone could have been given warning about the planned hack of Clinton campaigners or the plan create a scandal involving the Clintons (not that there aren’t legitimate ones). But did Stone himself develop the Pizzagate theory based on his knowledge of the Podesta email contents or was he fed it by the hackers? Going buy Stone’s past political trickery, perhaps a little bit of both. What is clear, though, is that Stone had the motive, skills, and time to orchestrate a dirty trick like Pizzagate.

Stone the dirty trickster and agent provocateur

If Roger Stone were indeed the author or co-author of the Pizzagate conspiracy theory, it wouldn’t be the first time the middle-aged swinger has pulled dirty tricks for the Likud-controlled U.S. Republican Party. He has operated for both George H.W. and George W. Bush, Ronald Regan, Richard Nixon, Donald Trump (business and politics), and other prominent people. A lot of his skills were learned from his mentor, Roy Cohn, a Jewish pederast and sexual blackmail operator working in the U.S. government. Cohn was also the mentor of Donald Trump. Retired New York Police Department detective James Rothstein claims that Stone was part of Cohn’s pedophile entrapment ring.

According to Stone critic Mark Ames, the three major points of the Trump-Stone association rests on:

1. Roger Stone’s dirty tricks specialty is manipulating voter fractures, and weaponizing anti-establishment politics to serve the electoral needs of mainstream Republican candidates;
2. Roger Stone and Donald Trump have been working together since the mid-1980s, mostly on sleazy campaigns to help Trump’s casino business, but also in politics;
3. Roger Stone and Donald Trump worked together in at least two major “black bag” operations manipulating anti-establishment politics to help the mainstream Republican presidential candidate.[vi]

Aside from Pizzagate, most recently, Stone implicated Trump’s internal GOP opponent Ted Cruz with the assassination of John F. Kennedy. It’s no coincidence that Stone’s longtime associates are, themselves, connected to the organized crime syndicate that orchestrated the murder of the Kennedys.[vii] Like Pizzagate, Stone attempts to use photographic evidence to prove his smear of Cruz.[viii] Perhaps Stone even came up with the “Alex Jones is really Bill Hicks” meme (also based on supposed photographic evidence), in an attempt to discredit Alex Jones’ critics and advance Likud’s false opponents in the alternative media.[ix] As with many of Stone’s dirty tricks, Trump publicly echoed the Cruz-JFK theory during his campaign run.

In 1972, when Stone was barely out of his teenage years, the ambitious Republican trickster went to work by entrapping Richard Nixon’s opponent for the Republican nomination Paul McCloskey. Stone had been working for Nixon’s re-election committee, CREEP, appropriately nicknamed by Nixon’s opponents. Using the fake name “Jason Rainier”, Stone donated funds to McCloskey under the pretext that it was on behalf of the Young Socialist Alliance. Stone then told the press that the would-be GOP nominee had accepted the funds, implying that McCloskey was an undercover socialist. The trick must have worked, as Nixon was eventually won the nominee.[x]

After aiding in the successful presidential campaigns of celebrity president Ronald Regan in the 1980s, Stone’s career of trickery encountered a bit of a setback and he was forced to resign from Bob Dole’s 1996 campaign. Ironically, the National Enquirer, a publication Stone has used to aid in his political black operating, exposed Stone’s sexual libertinism—namely that he was a bisexual swinger.[xi] Whether or not Stone was involved in Lew Rosenstiel and Roy Cohn’s boy-loving sex ring at Trump’s former Plaza Hotel suite 233[xii] is unknown.

Stone would eventually make his way back into black operating for the Likudniks during the Bush II era. He helped out George W. Bush in his 2000 campaign while under threat from the Reform Party and its candidate Pat Buchanan.

Stone got Trump to join the Reform party and then leave it, under the guise of disillusionment, in an attempt to derail the Reform party’s growing popularity and split votes.
Stone was also behind the alleged Buchanan baby scandal in a further attempt to divide and weaken Bush’s opponent, securing Bush’s victory for the Zionist cryptocracy.[xiii]

“The Stone-inspired Reform infighting served multiple Bush interests: It killed any possibility of a third Perot run, blocked the candidacy of former Connecticut governor Lowell Weicker, and forced out the party’s only elected official, Minnesota governor Jesse Ventura. Buchanan’s vanishing act—after Stone cajoled him to run Reform—left nearly a dozen party leaders contacted by the Voice convinced that he and Stone were conscious agents of doom.”[xiv]

Stone would pull off one more significant act of deception for the Likudniks running the Bush II campaign: obstructing justice in the Bush election theft.

Later that year, Stone, who calls himself “the GOP hitman,” spearheaded the Brooks Brothers riot that thwarted Florida’s ballot recount. By his account, Stone managed to rally right-wing protesters to assemble outside a voting center in Miami-Dade—a diverse county sympathetic to Gore. “The idea we were putting out there was that this was a left-wing power grab by Gore, the same way Fidel Castro did it in Cuba. We were very explicitly drawing that analogy,” Stone recalled. “The idea was to shut it down, stop the recount here in Miami.”[xv]

False-flagging, agent provocateuring, and causing infighting—these are the rotten fruits of Roger Stone.
In 2004, during the Bush. Jr. re-election campaign, Stone reportedly used FBI informant-black activist Al Sharpton to steal the nomination from Democrat Al Gore in order for Sharpton to become a strawman opponent to Bush.

“As it turns out, Al Sharpton entered the 2004 Democratic primaries on the payroll and orders of Roger Stone, who directed Sharpton’s attacks from the race politics-left against Howard Dean. And as the New York Times revealed that year, it was Donald Trump who took credit for introducing Al Sharpton—a one-time FBI informant—to his old friend and lobbyist, GOP dirty trickster Roger Stone,” writes Ames.[xvi]

One wonders from where Stone was getting the money to pay for stunts like this. Was it coming from Tel Aviv or through one of Israel’s CIA conduits?

“After neutralizing the Reform Party and blocking the Florida recount with his hired “Brooks Brothers mob” Roger Stone was rewarded by President Bush by being put in charge of the Bush-Cheney 2000 transition team’s Indian Bureau Affairs appointments. Even in this, Trump did a solid for Stone, signing his name on a fake letter written by Stone in order to sink the nomination of the “wrong” Indian tribal leader who wasn’t Stone’s man. The fake Trump letter ensured that Stone’s man, Neal McCaleb, was given the job as head of Bush’s Indian Affairs Bureau instead.”

These are just some of the Stone-Trump dirty tricks politics. I am sure we will learn some more as the Trump administration devolves into an even greater Likud front and the opposition grows more tired of the lies and treachery.

Zionist David Seaman, the Pizzagate fall guy?
Either David Seaman is the real author or co-author of Pizzagate or he is the front should Stone’s potential role behind it be revealed to the public. Either way, Seaman is as suspicious as Stone. The former mainstream media journalist’s surname is ironic considering the content of the Pizzagate conspiracy claims. His role in the Trump campaign earlier this fall seems to have been to promote the theory that Hillary Clinton was on the verge of dying.
And he had help from almost all in the alternative media in spreading this distraction, which turned out to be false.

Clinton is alive and well, it seems. For what purpose this little tale served is for speculation. With so many damning revelations about Trump and his character during the presidential race, it could have served to distract from dozens of things. Overall, it was a suspicious diversion coming from a mainstream media “reporter”, who ended up allegedly being fired as a result of fixating on this one topic. Following this firing, he apparently moved on to Pizzagate. Seaman is Jewish and also Zionist.[xvii] With this, his role in the Likud-controlled GOP and its propagation of the Pizzagate conspiracy theory makes more sense.

The Pizzagate evidence
The initial Pizzagate evidence was the supposed pedophile code John Podesta used in his emails. It was based on a “pizza-related map” on a handkerchief, which could have been nothing more than a logo-clad napkin with a map to a pizzeria. Secondary evidence, most of which has been debunked, included a series of perverted photos, some of which involved Kim Noble’s Satanic ritual abuse art and had nothing to do with anyone involved in Pizzagate. Like Stone’s other dubious photographic evidence, Pizzagate theorists used a batch of photos supposedly obtained from Comet Ping Pong owner James Alefantis’ social media accounts to advance their theories. It’s pointless to comment on the supposed photos until it can be proven that they are authentic. The same goes for the Podesta emails. But what we can comment on is the photoshopping of the fictitious pedophile code used to scandalize Podesta. Also, Stone’s apparent history of forging documents lends credibility to the thesis of this article. The photoshopper (Stone or Seaman?) added a “white” category to the homosexual underground handkerchief code (did Stone select this handkerchief code based on his own knowledge of this code, himself being involved in the homosexual underworld?). The photoshopped graphic describes the category as “pedo/virgin”. A simple online search of a more exhaustive homosexual handkerchief[xviii] code does indeed reveal a white category; however, it does not mean pedo or virgin. Furthermore, the code is not necessarily universally adopted by all homosexuals, or other sexual deviants.

Evidence suggests that some perverts use localized codes, ones that they develop specifically for their group, like in the case of 4chan, which does seem to use “cheese pizza” as sort of adaptive acronym for “child porn”.

Ironically, 4chan, a known pedophile hangout, was instrumental in spreading the Pizzagate theory. Regardless, there is nothing to substantiate the alleged code used in the Podesta emails. It’s all wild speculation and reaching.

Another photographic piece of “evidence” used by the theorists is a police sketching of the supposed Madeline McCann kidnapper. Even though the police sketching is two different renderings of one man, the Pizzagaters use it to prop up their theory that it’s two renderings of two men—whom they claim is John and Tony Podesta. From there, there is virtually nowhere the Pizzagate theorists won’t go. They try to to tie Pizzagate to every child-sex scandal in history and then accuse skeptics of being pedophiles and child rapist sympathizers for not automatically accepting their cockamamie theories.

Some Pizzagaters will admit to the flimsiness of the core evidence but will ask “what about all the other stuff?”.

Using a basic chain of logic, the other stuff is all meaningless until the primary evidence can be proven.

Wikileaks the Zionist psyop

It’s debated whether Wikileaks has “leaked” anything from its archive of hacks that has had any significance in world affairs and politics.
It’s also debated as to the legitimacy of its hacked content, which has been gathering for ten years now. But what is known is that Wikileaks has rarely, if ever, leaked anything of significance as it pertains to Zionism and the state of Israel. Out of all the scandals and corruption in the world, Wikileaks has never managed to implicate the world’s biggest conspirator in any significant wrongdoing. This wouldn’t be a coincidence had Wikileaks been a Mossad/CIA-controlled psyop. In fact, Wikileaks has not only omitted and covered up Israeli/Zionist crimes, it has worked to promote its propaganda, like the Likud lie that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.[xix] Furthermore, it appears that Wikileaks may be the direct creation of none other than the Rothschild dynasty. It goes without saying that the Rothschild agenda is the same as that of Likud and their lackeys in the American GOP. From wherever Wikileaks supposedly obtained the Podesta emails, it was with the blessing of the Zionist establishment.

Perhaps the biggest red flag to the legitimacy of Wikileaks is the miraculous elusiveness and survival of its founder Julian Assange, who has managed to dodge the greatest, most ubiquitous surveillance state in world history. Assange makes it all too easy to dismiss him as a Zionist-Rothschild COINTELPRO operative when he makes comments like the following:

“I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.”[xx]

As we can see, Roger Stone, Donald Trump, David Seaman, and Wikileaks all have one thing in common: Israel.
Pizzagate can only be a clever Likud distraction to coverup the crimes and corruption of Trump and his loyalty to Israel and the money power.

Stone claims he has been in touch with Assange through “mutual friends”.[xxi] If true, it can only be intelligence friends, likely in the CIA/Mossad.

Pizzagate also serves to discredit the “truther” movement, aid Internet censorship agenda
While many in the truth community spend countless hours chasing the breadcrumbs likely left by Stone, and Assange, and coming up with yet more theories surrounding Pizzagate, the mainstream media and the conspirators poke fun at the truth movement and discredit it as a progenitor of fake news and lies. The mass hysteria resulting from this possible Roger Stone dirty trick has even eventuated in a recent false-flag attack, where an alleged gunman, provoked by a sense of Pizzagate justice, entered Comet Ping Pong for revenge.

Fortunately, nothing serious happened. But in the near future, a more serious false-flag attack could occur at one of the alleged Pizzagate-associated businesses in Washington, DC, resulting in more serious demonization of the alternative media and truthers alike and likely new, sweeping Internet censorship legislation.

Pizzagate, like the Jade Helm, flat Earth, and Jesuit conspiracy theories, could be part of a Cass Sunstein-like attempt to discredit legitimate conspiracies by flooding the truth movement with plausible yet ultimately false and fake conspiracy theories. Of course, an operation like this would also have to be carried out by the intelligence community and its hatchet men like Roger Stone.

Notes:
[i] Goodwin, Liz, Podesta says Trump adviser Roger Stone may have had ‘advance knowledge’ of hack, Oct. 11, 2016, Yahoo! News – https://www.yahoo.com/news/podesta-says-trump-adviser-roger-stone-may-have-had-advance-knowledge-of-hack-020432912.html
[ii] @RogerJStoneJr, Twitter, Aug. 21, 2016 https://twitter.com/RogerJStoneJr/status/767366825743097856?p=v
[iii] Goodwin, Liz, Podesta says Trump adviser Roger Stone may have had ‘advance knowledge’ of hack, Oct. 11, 2016, Yahoo! News – https://www.yahoo.com/news/podesta-says-trump-adviser-roger-stone-may-have-had-advance-knowledge-of-hack-020432912.html
[iv] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Trump controlled by the Mossad – Part III, Fitzpatrick Informer, Nov. 19, 2016 – https://fitzinfo.net/2016/11/19/trump-controlled-by-the-mossad-part-iii/
[v] American Free Press, Is Trump a Populist or a Pro-Zionist Spoiler?, Oct. 19, 2015 – https://americanfreepress.net/is-trump-a-populist-or-a-pro-zionist-spoiler/
[vi] Ames, Mark, Behind the scenes of the Donald Trump – Roger Stone show, August 11, 2015, Pando – https://pando.com/2015/08/11/behind-scenes-donald-trump-roger-stone-show/
[vii] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Trump controlled by the Mossad – Part II, November 8, 2016, Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.net/2016/11/08/trump-controlled-by-the-mossad-part-ii/
[viii] Durkin, J.D., Roger Stone ‘Confirms’ Rafael Cruz Was Tied to JFK in the Most Roger Stone Way Imaginable, May 4, 2016, Mediate – http://www.mediaite.com/online/roger-stone-confirms-rafael-cruz-was-tied-to-jfk-in-the-most-roger-stone-way-imaginable/
[ix] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Is Alex Jones behind the conspiracy theory that he is Bill Hicks?, Nov. 26, 2014, Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.net/2014/11/26/is-alex-jones-behind-the-conspiracy-theory-that-he-is-bill-hicks/
[x] Preza, Elizabeth, Trump’s Dirty Trickster: The Staggeringly Shady Dealings of Political Operative Roger Stone, May 11, 2016, AlterNet – http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trumps-dirty-trickster-staggeringly-shady-dealings-political-operative-roger-stone
[xi] ibid
[xii] Fitzpatrick, Timothy, Trump controlled by the Mossad – Part III, November 8, 2016, Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.wordpress.com/2016/11/19/trump-controlled-by-the-mossad-part-iii/
[xiii] Barrett, Wayne, The sex scandal that put Bush in the White House, May 11, 2004, The Village Voice – http://www.villagevoice.com/news/the-sex-scandal-that-put-bush-in-the-white-house-6407173
[xiv] ibid
[xv] Preza, Elizabeth, Trump’s Dirty Trickster: The Staggeringly Shady Dealings of Political Operative Roger Stone, May 11, 2016, AlterNet – http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/trumps-dirty-trickster-staggeringly-shady-dealings-political-operative-roger-stone
[xvi] Ames, Mark, Behind the scenes of the Donald Trump – Roger Stone show, August 11, 2015, Pando – https://pando.com/2015/08/11/behind-scenes-donald-trump-roger-stone-show/
[xvii] Pizzagate researcher David Seaman shills for Israel – http://www.infostormer.com/pizzagate-researcher-david-seaman-shills-for-israel/
[xviii] Gay hanky codes – https://user.xmission.com/~trevin/hanky.html
[xix] Azaziah, Jonathan, Wikileaks is Zionist poison, Oct. 28, 2010, Mask of Zion – http://www.maskofzion.com/2010/10/wikileaks-is-zionist-poison.html
[xx] Bell, Matthew, Wanted by the CIA: The man who keeps no secrets, July 17, 2010, The Independent – http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/online/wanted-by-the-cia-the-man-who-keeps-no-secrets-2029083.html
[xxi] Jones, Alex, Roger Stone breaks down Hillary’s kill count, Aug. 13, 2016, Youtube – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L-k897lV_I

Those who have even casually studied the 9/11 conspiracy are well aware of Israeli foreknowledge of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.

An honest researcher would see that Israel was not only aware ahead of time but intimately involved. Israel appears to have orchestrated the attacks through its terrorist arm Mossad, with help from the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, the Bush Administration, and other lower-level conspirators.

There are various stories of of certain persons and organizations being tipped off about the attacks, even warned not to be around Lower Manhattan that day. If you haven’t learned about them, there are dozens and dozens of research articles on the matter. Some of the most suspicious warnings came from Israeli instant messaging service Odigo (Comverse Technology) as well as usury king Goldman Sachs.

The New York Rangers—a professional hockey club within the Zionist-controlled pro sports racket National Hockey League, headed by Jew Gary Bettman—appears to be one such organization that was tipped off.

The Rangers were scheduled to begin their training camp for the 2001-2002 season early in September that year. The team, booked at the Marriott Hotel in the World Trade Center complex, were to report for physical examinations at Madison Square Garden on Sept. 11, after which the on-ice portion of camp was to begin.
However, two weeks before camp, the plans were changed and the team was relocated to a boutique hotel about two miles from the WTC. This information was disclosed by former Ranger Theoren Fleury in his autobiography Playing With Fire, which, incidentally, is about how Fleury was sexually abused by agents of the Zionist sports racket. In it, Fleury describes how, at only 14 years old, he was forced onto the NHL casting couch by a pederast coach in exchange for a fast track to the big league.

After the Team Canada mini-camp in Calgary, I left for the Rangers training camp in New York. We were scheduled to stay at the Marriott Hotel at the World Trade Center, next to the Twin Towers. We were to report for physicals at Madison Square Garden on September 11. Camp would begin the next day, with the public invited. We never practiced at the Garden, but Slats wanted to get us pumped up for the season. He was really happy to see me in the kind of shape I was in.
…
Two weeks before camp, plans changed and the team moved our reservations to a boutique hotel a couple of miles from the Twin Towers, closer to the Garden. I was rooming with Sandy McCarthy and we fell asleep watching TV the night of September 10. We woke up just as NBC was showing the first plane crashing into the South Tower. I assumed it was a movie, but the next thing I knew, Katie Couric came on. (Pg. 232)

Now this may just be a coincidence, but it’s slightly suspicious considering all the other reports of warnings to others to avoid the area on Sept. 11. And it seems likely that the conspirators would tip off a pro sports organization that would be under threat. After all, pro sports is central to the weapon of mass distraction used by the Judeo-Masonic cryptocracy to keep the masses under control. The conspirators couldn’t afford to lose an entire team of hockey superstars (the Rangers were stacked with some of the best in the entire league) as well as coaching personnel. So, the powers that be made sure their little investment was well protected and the boys were relocated.

In order that the masses themselves may not guess what they are about, we further distract them with amusements, games, pastimes, passions, people’s palaces …. Soon we shall begin through the press to propose competitions in art, in sport in all kinds: these interests will finally distract their minds from questions in which we should find ourselves compelled to oppose them.
—Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion 13:3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GD_vwzjdTi4