By Sholem Lugov
August 10, 2026

Donald Trump and the book “Zohar” is a combination that would have been hard to imagine a few years ago. But now a man who knows Trump not from newspapers talks about it.

Marla Maples, the former wife of the President of the United States, said that Trump carries an Aramaic copy of the book “Zohar”—one of the main texts of the Jewish mystical tradition.

This detail is especially interesting against the background of Trump’s long-standing connection with the Jewish people.

His daughter Ivanka accepted Judaism before marrying Jared Kushner. Their children are brought up in the Jewish tradition. Trump himself has repeatedly emphasized his support for Israel and his special attitude to the Jewish people.

And now there is another detail – “Zohar”, a book that reveals the deep secrets of the Torah, the soul and the spiritual structure of the world.

This, of course, does not mean that Trump has become a Kabbalist or that he studies “Zohar”. But if Maples’ statement is true, this detail itself is very unusual.

A man whom the whole world is used to seeing primarily as a businessman and politician turns out to be connected with the Jewish tradition not only through his daughter and his own family, but perhaps also through a book that occupies a special place in the history of Jewish spirituality.

Sometimes a big story manifests itself in one small detail. “Zohar” at the heart – perhaps just such a detail.

By Ryan Augustine

Like a woman in her 30s binging on red wine and Prozac, Kremlin agents will cloak the Communism of their fellow agents through projection. The Communist-aligned Left in the world has projected the false illusion that Trump and Putin are fascists to hide their identity as leaders in the worldwide international socialism movement. Neither Trump nor Putin fit the definition of fascism but are, in fact, Trotskyites of the lowest order.

Fascism is an odd marriage of socialism and nationalism. It embodies socialism, which is in itself a logical conclusion of liberalism. As the book Liberalism is a Sin, by Fr. Felix Sarda teaches us, liberalism is a sin of pride, the pride of man asserting his authority over God. Socialism takes this pride to its conclusion, whereby, the man tries to perfect himself through natural means. This is why socialism believes that spiritual problems such as jealousy or laziness can be solved through economics and the equitable distribution of money and property. Socialism looks forwards to utopia yet will always end up creating a nightmare, because it is impossible to raise something up to be higher than itself by lower things.

Fascism is an odd combination of socialism and nationalism. Because it is socialist, the nationalism of fascism is always state and ethnic worship. The Christian idea of nationalism is the love on one’s people, but because fascism is socialist and eschews God’s authority for the authority of man, thus as man has become the supreme object: nationalism in fascism takes on a religiosity of state and ethnic worship. If nations are the political body of the people and the people (ethnos) are supreme, then in fascism what is deemed good for the people is seen as objectively good. Therefore, fascism can be thought of as a system where good is relative to the national collective.

Fascism is a very confused ideology because it simultaneously looks forward towards a socialist utopia as it looks backwards at a mythic past constantly trying to use imperfect means to improve upon what it already calls perfect. Thus, fascism is internally conflicted, and it is no surprise that it flamed out after a few attempts in the last century. Unfortunately ,the circumstances of those burnouts were quite spectacular, and the name of fascism has been used to misdirect people ever since. Donald Trump is no fascist. Donald Trump uses MAGA as misdirection. Donald Trump is a Communist.

Communism is the logical conclusion of socialism. Because socialism is the conclusion of liberalism, whereby man attempts to perfect himself through natural means, because natural means are corrupted by original sin; therefore, attempting to perfect that which God has made through ways that corrupt it is rebellion against God and evil. Thus, Communism is the final stage of socialism whereby socialism creates a political philosophy of open rebellion against God.

Thus, it should come as no surprise that those who hate God and also those who hate God so much, they who crucified our Lord would also be the ones who advocate for Communism. It should come as no surprise that Trump and Putin count themselves members of this Tribe of people.

If one pays any attention to Trump, one will see a man who is in rebellion against God, and a man who seeks to lead the people he governs into the same rebellion with him. These are the signs:

Trump is a man of sin. He is a twice divorced, thrice married casino owner. He is an actor who was a headline in the Satanic entertainment industry which corrupts and destroys souls. He was a friend of Jeffery Epstein, Roy Cohn, and attended their parties with so many other degenerate perverts he called his friends. His ego is enormous, and he has referred to himself as King, and made references to being god on occasion. His MAGA movement is fueled by decades of pent-up jealousy, envy, and vengeance against liberals, republican weakness, and not having a voice, which blinds its members. It is all well and good to seek justice to redress past wrongs, but if your idea of a plan is to indulge in emotional gratification by “owning” the libs or being “based”, then you are not putting America First. You are putting your sin first and you become irrational to seeing facts and putting the good of America before your cultish following of Trump.

Trump’s foreign policy is to unite regions of the world into Communist regional super governments along Dugin’s multipolarity plan. Trump has pushed to incorporate Canada, Greenland, and Mexico into the American nation. A fascist would seek to expand his country’s borders through conquest or subjugation so that his own people, his ethnos, may have more resources or land. Trump wishes to bring other nationalities into America to dilute his and balkanize his own people so they become powerless in the country they built. Trump’s actions towards Ukraine are catalyzing the European Union to organize into a cohesive, socialist government with a standing army. Russia and China are becoming closer and are emboldened to unite along with the central Asian countries and become a third geopolitical Communist big space. Thus, under Trump we are seeing three of the socialist multipolarity powers rise with the others soon to emerge. These transnational socialist governments will and are completely divorced from their ethnos and only serve as a stepping stone towards unified world Communist government.

Trump is rabidly pro-immigration. Deportations are down; the last statics show that deportations have been halved since he took office. Trump’s shadow-consiglieri, Musk, is on record as saying he will die for H1B1 visas. Many in Trump’s presidential clique are Indian, including the director of the FBI, Czar of AI, Vivek Ramaswamy, and his Vice President James Downsyndrome Vance. Trump is on record saying he will sell off American citizenship. These are not the actions of a fascist, but rather the actions of a Communist who is rebelling against the races and peoples diversely created by God. It is a rebellion which seeks to de-legitimize the natural authority a people should have over themselves through their government and replace it with very smelly mercenaries. It is the Communist who seeks to miscegenate his own people to evolve them into something lower than what God has created them to be.

Trump seeks to build 10 Communist “freedom” cities. He seeks to use the treasure to prop up Bitcoin. Trump seeks to invest half a trillion dollars into AI. Trump is building the infrastructure for the Communist technocratic society to repress Americans. Whereby communism failed in the past because it could not calculate the true cost of goods produced and because of corruption, lack of motivation, and the independent free willed nature of human beings, Trump is breaking the bank to invest in technologies which Communism believes can overcome these problems. So much for DOGE saving the American people money.

Trump is a Communist because he confirms everything in our culture which has been leading us towards Communism for the last 80 years. If conservatives and Trump were fascists when you went to school, did they tell you to love your country, that America was the best, a proud nation, a good people? Our culture is superior to all others? Is there a single TV show which shows normal whites winning and minorities losing? Can you go into work, presumably you work for an American company, and tell your coworkers that American culture is superior to any foreign culture? That we are simply better because of who we are? They are an American Company paying taxes to the American government; if corporations were fascist, shouldn’t this be required? Of course not. Everything you have been brought up with is leading you towards Communism. Has Trump done anything to counter this? Presumably he is the president in charge of the department of education, is he not? Trump goes along and supports this as evidenced by his pardon of rapper Kodak Black. If Trump were a Conservative, he would try to heal the culture by orientating it towards higher things, by resetting our priorities towards God. But Trump is a Communist and he spares no insult towards higher things and takes advantage of every opportunity to tear our social fabric down.

Trump is a communist because he is a donkey in lions’ garb. He a traitor who is playing his part pretending to be a man of the Right and his presidency will be a disaster. We cannot know the circumstances of his fall, but his entire mission has been to take that fall and to take true conservatism down with him. And when this disaster happens, whether it be war or an economic crisis, all the people will say of MAGA: “let us never do that again.” Trump is not a fascist, he is a Communist because his plan is to make being conservative have the same stigma as being fascist does today. Mark these words, you will hear two things from all the MAGA grifters when Trump’s fall happens: silence (and “I was the first to warn you about Trump”). You will be the one holding the bag. Trump is a Communist because his mission is to destroy the political philosophy of love which a people have for themselves that we call true conservatism.

Disavow Trump before it is too late.

Oh, I also wrote this poem because I was bored and bitter at being blocked for calling out Thule’s Trumptard mania. Seems like a good place to put it.

There once was a philonip named thuletide

Upon the altar of genetics he lamented and he cried:

Moderate centrism is not a sight

I behold within the Alt-right

And nary evermore shall Britain taste

The pure genome of the Anglo race

Through the online slings of sparrows I must confide

I am a creature of my pride

And here I wallow in despair of miscegenation most brown, foul and unfair

Hark what do I espy over there: A donkey wears a lion’s coat of gilded hair.

And what fangs upon his golden face? And the lushest rush of his crimson mane

What gaping maw of the immigrants race, and the roses of Donald’s bane

Gloriously trumped the proud donkey magnificent and Yuge

No illegals, but 5 million shekels and my land is your refuge.

Twas its kosher braying that set my heart alight

For this brave creature carries on my fight

Yet when the donkey ceased to speak

There came from the left an odious squeak

I sat shocked and despised

His enemies grifts and libtard lies

Yet to my joyous repose, came the donkey’s answer to our foes:

I am not a lion of many rapes, for in phases I shall release Epstein’s lists, but not his tapes!

As lighting begets thunder so to me this was Dues Vult.

That I should join the MAGA cult!

“Dictatorship can be established only by a victory of socialism in different countries or groups of countries, after which there would be federal unions of the various groupings of these socialist countries, and the third stage would be an amalgamation of these regional federal unions into a world union of socialist nations.”

—Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin

By Charlotte Iserbyt
February 27, 2007 Anno Domini

There is one common thread running through all articles and speeches by elected officials, well-known writers, and commentators in opposition to the merging of the United States into a political and economic regional arrangement known as the North American Union. To my knowledge, not one of them has chosen to use the “C” word (Communism) when warning Americans of the dangers of this unconstitutional merger about to be foisted upon us without proper hearings in Congress. Excellent speeches and articles are being given and written warning us of all sorts of bad things related to this merger, including the fact that we will lose our sovereignty, but we are not being told that all these bad things are necessary for the full implementation of The North American Soviet Union (communistic/regional system). Isn’t the “C” word the one and only word which might shock Americans out of their state of conditioned apathy, thereby bringing about citizen activism which might result in killing this “regional” monster?

Morris Zeitlin, a communist writer for the Communist Party�s Daily World said in an article entitled Planning is Socialism Trademark, November 8, 1975:”We (USA) have no regional government and no comprehensive regional planning to speak of. Regional government and planning remain concepts our urban scholars and planners have long advocated in vain. In socialist countries, metropolitan regions enjoy metropolitan regional government and comprehensive planning. The economic and functional efficiencies and the social benefits that comprehensive national, regional and city planning make possible in socialist society explain the Soviet Union’s enormous and rapid economic social progress.”

Of interest regarding Zeitlin’s comment about “the Soviet Union’s enormous and rapid economic social progress” is the following admission made by former President Gorbachev at the 2005 National School Board Association conference that “half the world’s population and two-thirds of Russians lives in poverty.”

The United States Government, at all levels, has since 1975 accepted wholeheartedly Zeitlin’s advice, to the extent that our country is, believe it or not, almost 100 percent socialist in its political, economic, social, and environmental (sustainable development) policies. For documentation please read Walks Like a Duck, Talks Like a Duck.

The regionalization (consolidation) of the world is quite similar to the three-stage plan outlined by Stalin at the 1936 Communist International. At that meeting, the official program proclaimed:

“Dictatorship can be established only by a victory of socialism in different countries or groups of countries, after which there would be federal unions of the various groupings of these socialist countries, and the third stage would be an amalgamation of these regional federal unions into a world union of socialist nations.” (Ed note: The third stage is taking place right now as we in the United States of America become part of a federal union, the North American Union, which will in the near future become part of a world union of socialist nations.)

Former President of the Soviet Union Gorbachev on March 23, 2000, in London, referred to the European Union (EU) as “the New European Soviet.” If he refers to the E.U. in that way, it only stands to reason that he would refer to the North American Union (NAU) as the “New American Soviet,” since the NAU is modeled on the E.U. Gorbachev also said in his speech to the Soviet Central Committee on November 2, 1987, published by Novosti Press Agency Publishing House:

“We are moving toward a new world, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.”—Gorbachev

How is it possible that if American citizens or United States officials involved in putting us under the North American Union were aware of Gorbachev’s statements, they would not be very concerned regarding our nation becoming part of a Communist world? Have we forgotten the many hundreds of millions of innocent people tortured, starved, murdered, and incarcerated by Communist regimes around the world? Authorities say “over 20 million people suffered in purges under Vladimir Lenin and Josef Stalin — and that more than 10 million died before Stalin’s death in 1953. Some put the number even higher.” [Read]

Do we really believe the Communists have changed or gone away?

United States government officials, elected and unelected, with enormous financial assistance from the tax-exempt foundations, have for many years been working to implement unconstitutional regional planning at the local, state, national and international level, all of this required for full implementation of a One World Socialist Government. For the 3000-page transcript of 1953 Congressional (Reece and Cox Committee) Hearings to Investigate the Tax-Exempt Foundations and for superb research on the history of regional government, go to americandeception.com and type the following into its search engine: Reece Committee, Don Bell Reports, Maureen Heaton, the Mantooth Report, and The Emerging North American Union.

One very important government official in the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations, Under Secretary of State George W. Ball, spelled out very clearly what the Insiders were planning for our nation in The New York Times, 1/24/88: “If we could internationalize by using the United Nations in conjunction with the Soviet Union, because we now no longer have to fear in most cases a Soviet veto, then we could begin to transform the shape of the world and might get the U.N. back doing something useful. Sooner or later we’re going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that they’re not confined merely to the nation states. Start first on a regional, and ultimately you can move to a world, basis.” (emphasis added).

Has our education system so successfully conditioned and dumbed down Americans that they no longer are able to apply logic to the above quotes? Are they no longer capable of transferring that knowledge, processing it into new knowledge and conclusions which might help them understand and oppose the present destruction of our Constitutional Republic?

Since all regional groupings being set up around the world are based on the communistic Free Trade “redistribute the wealth” philosophy, why is it that the adjective “Communist” is never used when discussing GATT, NAFTA, CAFTA and the NAU? Those patriotic writers could at least describe those agreements as “Communism LITE,” couldn’t they?

For those Americans who recall the days of elected officials, not unelected, appointed task forces and “councils” (Soviets, according to most dictionaries), running our towns, schools, counties, states, nation, and world, recognizing this change in our form of government should not be too difficult.

However, for those younger Americans denied an education in American history and government due to the activities of the tax-exempt foundations, especially the Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie Foundations, the loss of elected officials through regionalism does not seem to bother them. Go to americandeception.com and type into search engine “Kenny Hignite” and you will see a most astonishing six-page 1954 “Test on the United States Constitution”, on which Hignite received a grade of 99 “Excellent!” There is absolutely no way that Kenny Hignite, now 66 years old, having received such an excellent education on the U.S. Constitution in a public school in Central California in 1954, would not be questioning the present deliberate destruction of our representative form of government through the implementation of Communistic regional government!

Those Americans under fifty years old, and too often those over 50 years old (!), will ask you “What’s wrong with members of the community or faceless state bureaucrats being appointed to assist our elected officials in their work which has become increasingly complicated?” The simple answer is, “if you don’t approve of what those unelected officials are doing, you can’t get rid of them at the polls.”

Uneducated Americans will also ask you:

“What’s wrong with consolidation of school districts, services, the merging of individual school and town budgets to “save taxpayers money?” (Ed note: In Maine our Senate Education Committee is about to approve Governor Baldacci’s proposal to slash school districts by proposing 26 regional school units statewide with 26 superintendents, compared to the existing 152 superintendents and 290 school units!);

“What’s wrong with merging 16 towns under one county council as was recently proposed in Cumberland County, Maine, thereby eliminating representative government?”

“What’s wrong with getting rid of local school boards and having our schools run by city Mayors, or contracting education out to private organizations connected with the corporations?”

“What possible objection could you have to public school morals and values education even if those programs are forbidden to teach “absolute” morals and values based on the Ten Commandments?”

“What’s wrong with publicly-funded charter schools which have no elected school boards?”

“What’s wrong with Cuban-style school-to-work job training replacing a K-12 liberal arts curriculum? Even if my child can’t read, I sure want him/her to be able to get a job.”

“What’s wrong with public/private partnerships?”

“What’s wrong with the federal government mandating mental health screening for my child?”

“What’s wrong with members of the community assisting the local police in monitoring citizen activities and/or the police handing out awards to citizens who do good deeds, as is the case with the Community-Oriented Policing System (COPS) in Maine?”

What’s wrong with putting the U.N.’s lifelong learning agenda, all community services (birth through death), under the umbrella of the school district? (Go to americandeception.comand type “Feld” into search engine for a remarkable research paper on the history of Community Education)

“What’s wrong with a National I.D. card reportedly designed by two Russian ex-KGB Chiefs?”

“What’s wrong with students being required to perform community service in order to graduate?”

“What’s wrong with federal funding of religious organizations (faith-based initiative)?”

“What’s wrong with federally-funded school choice proposals?”

“What’s wrong with dropping borders between states?” as is in the offing.

And, the subject of this article: “What’s wrong with regional government?” And many more, “What’s Wrong With?”questions from good Americans who have, over many years, through no fault of their own, been deliberately dumbed down and didn’t receive the public education which required the likes of Kenny Hignite to know their Constitution and form of government.

How many Americans realize that almost all the programs mentioned in the above “What’s Wrong With”section have already been implemented in our schools, communities, and states and that they are based on communist/socialist collectivist philosophy? The planners are waiting only for the full implementation of the North American Union (final nail in coffin) which will allow them to write and approve, as was done in Europe, the North American Union’s Constitution (Communist Manifesto) which will include all the above “What’s Wrong With?” programs. That will be the infamous day when the U.S. Constitution is formally relegated to history’s trash bin. And, as with the EU Constitution, or the Communist Manifesto, the practice of Christianity will be outlawed a thing of the past. All religions will be considered equal and inevitably superior to Christianity. Go to americandeception.com and type into search engine “Religion and Governance” an important position paper by Harlan Cleveland, notorious supporter of global government, long-time member of the internationalist Aspen Institute, and first U.S. Ambassador to the Common Market (1960), and Marc Luycx, a Belgian change agent bureaucrat. This paper was prepared by the Foreward Study Group of the European Commission and was undoubtedly used by those drafting the EU Constitution. It will give you a picture of the non-role of Christianity in world region constitutions.

Our elected officials in Congress, who have sworn to uphold the Constitution, should not be immune to multi-million dollar lawsuits for injuries sustained by the citizens of this country. Is not the loss of our freedoms due to elected officials� malpractice (lying to us in regard to putting us under the communistic regional North American Union and not holding hearings on the subject) even more important than the death of one patient due to a doctor�s malpractice, the scalding of a woman who spilled her �too-hot� coffee at a McDonald�s takeout, or the death from cancer of a woman who smoked too many cigarettes? How can we ignore the fact that 651,008 Americans have died in battle to protect and defend the constitutional freedoms which will vanish under this new international regional arrangement? Is there really no penalty to be exacted of these highly-paid Congressional traitors other than voting them out of office, which it seems is impossible to do due to both political parties having the same agenda, controlled media, manipulated political conventions, and election fraud?

Americans have been conditioned to NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, since the days of McCarthyism and the phony fall of communism, mention the “C” word. The word must, as George Orwell might have said, be removed from the dictionaries of all languages, especially English. Otherwise, we might wise up and tackle this treason with all our might and brains since we surely don’t want our children and grandchildren living under any “ism” form of government, much less”Communism”. The Insiders know that “Communism” is the one and only word that must be banished from use. They are not concerned over excellent anti-North American Union rantings and ravings as long as the “C” word is NOT used.

The Insiders, most if not all of whom are corporate communists, have no fear of the coming totalitarian system since they have been assured they will be sitting in the catbird seat, having eliminated all economic competition and self-government (elected officials), and will have the world as their playground. The majority of the world’s population, the Insiders’ human resources, will be their highly trained and conditioned serfs, lifelong.

One might ask, how can this be? It is a well-known and documented fact that Wall Street funded the Bolshevik Revolution and the corporate Communists and our government have been supporting the Communist regime in Russia since 1917. Extensive exchange agreements covering political, municipal, cultural, economic, legal, law enforcement, education, science, sports, medicine, etc. have been signed since 1958 between the USSR and the USA, including of special importance the 1985 education agreements signed by Presidents Reagan and Gorbachev which merged our two education systems and caused to be implemented the Soviet polytechnical work force/job quota system and the Pavlovian outcomes-based method of conditioning/training. Go to americandeception.comfor full text of “Agreement between U.S.A. and USSR”.

Regionalism is communism no matter how you slice it. The sooner Americans get that unpleasant fact permanently entered into their brains, and process that information into appropriate action, the sooner we will be able to escape what Orwell described so well in his novel 1984:

“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on the human face–forever…and remember, that is forever.”

Forward this article to your friends and to your elected officials at the local, state, and national level. Of equal importance restore the “C” word to your vocabulary and use it often.

2007 Charlotte T. Iserbyt – All Rights Reserved

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 22, 2022 Anno Domini

One factor in late U.S. Senator John Tower’s lost bid for Secretary of Defense was due to his alleged sexual compromise by a Soviet “sparrow”.

The United States Senate rejected Tower’s nomination for U.S. Secretary of Defense by 53-47 votes in 1989 after an investigation found he was sexually compromised (kompromat) by one or more “swallows” (female KGB sexual operators) while working in Geneva, Switzerland as head of the Soviet-invented Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I), a clever way of “promoting peace” and disarmament but on Soviet terms (meaning only the USSR left with nuclear capability).

According to the Chicago Tribune,

“Defense Secretary-designate John Tower quit the U.S. arms control delegation in Geneva in 1986 after his wife threw him out of their home because he was keeping secretaries as mistresses, according to a U.S. investigator who looked into allegations of wrongdoing in the delegation.”

The report went on to say that Air Force Col. Robert Moser Jr., then a top aide to Tower and other U.S. ambassadors, “supposedly maintained ‘hit lists’ of damaging information on his fellow Geneva delegation members. Moser, Indahl said, had dismissed his illicit affair with a woman with Soviet-bloc links by noting that 14 of his peers—including 13 who were married—were engaged in similar affairs while part of the 100-member U.S. Geneva team.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump is suspected of having been sexually compromised by the Russian state and/or its satellites in the “former” Soviet bloc—the direct result of which is believed to have influenced the decisions he made while serving in the White House.  

In 1989, a photo was taken of Trump alongside Senator Tower, CBS host Mike Wallace, and KGB-Mossad operative Robert Maxwell (late father of Ghislaine Maxwell) on board Maxwell’s yacht, The Lady Ghislaine. Maxwell is believed to have been involved with Jeffrey Epstein and his apparent sexual compromise operation of VIPs using his daughter Ghislaine to procure teenaged girls from the United States, Russia, and Eastern Europe. One of the girls, Maria Farmer, claimed Trump was involved in the Maxwell-Epstein sex ring. Maxwell may have been the ringleader who ensnared both Trump and Tower, eventually using both for neo-Soviet purposes: with Trump, using his business clout and eventual presidency to advance Western-Soviet convergence, and with Tower, to use his clout as a politician to advance the phony disarmament agenda and to provide government access (intelligence, Sandia, high technology, etc.) to Soviet saboteurs and double agents. Tower was involved in the Soviet-Israel PROMIS espionage affair by helping the Jewish KGB operative Robert Maxwell gain access to U.S. nuclear lab Sandia, where the spy penetrated the U.S. government’s most sensitive area with Soviet-Israel bugging capabilities. Tower was also involved in the Soviet-Israel-orchestrated Iran Contra Affair. 

Late Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn wrote that the disarmament and world peace effort was a Soviet-invented ruse used to render the West completely vulnerable to Soviet nuclear blackmail, which would result in Soviet-Western convergence and eventual world government.

“My assessment is that, when the long-range strategy was worked out and adopted in the period 1958-60, the Soviets and Chinese agreed to plan and prepare for the eventual reform and liberalisation of their regimes while, in the meantime, following different paths,” Golitsyn writes in The Perestroika Deception (1995). “Liberalisation formed part of the strategic design of procuring the disarmament of the West and the convergence of the Communist and Eastern systems on Communist terms.

…

“In his predictions made in 1967, Sakharov said that ‘restructuring’, disarmament, socialist convergence and the creation of a World Government could be complete by the year 2000. His timetable may have slipped a bit but, given Western ignorance of Soviet strategy and the West’s erroneous response to Gorbachev, the worst may happen.”

The disgraced Tower died in 1991 in a somewhat mysterious plane crash with his family, the same year as the fake collapse of communism was orchestrated and the beginning of the end for the free world.

*Editor’s note: Donald Trump’s name was incorrectly printed as “Ronald”.

By Shturem.net
December, 2007 Anno Domini
Translated from the Hebrew

The new owner of Maccabi Tel Aviv is the billionaire Alex Schneider, who is close to the community’s rabbi of Russia in Ontario, Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak Salzman.

Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV | Part V | Part VI | Part VII

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
October 27, 2020 Anno Domini

The evolution of the Epstein scandal now appears to reveal a very clear message to those who can see: the decades-long Soviet strategy of discrediting (and destroying) the West, via its leaders—through a Satanic, meticulously planned crescendo that could occur this fall during the U.S. presidential election and Brexit-no-deal.

Three of the biggest faces in the West—Donald Trump, Prince Andrew, and Boris Johnson—all seem to be fulfilling an age-old plan to bring down the West on behalf of the Jewish neo-Soviet power bloc due their own moral weakness and selfish ambition, which seems to have been exploited by the illuminist Russian federation and its satellites, especially Israel.

With the late Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged child procurer Ghislaine Maxwell now in FBI custody, it seems the Soviet KGB/Mossad active measure of Operation Epstein soon may be drawing to a close with only one final act remaining.

The British Monarchy, regardless of how corrupt and complicit it has become in the world anti-Christ communist conspiracy, must be destroyed before world communism can be installed. Enter Prince Andrew, Duke of York, as the catalyst for dividing the Royal family and making this communist goal possible (think Megxit). While the media may trivialize and downplay the significance of the disunity of the Royal Family, much of which is due to the revelations of Prince Andrew’s alleged involvement in the Epstein KGB/Mossad blackmail ring, the breakup is part of the plan to usher in the new world socialist order—as is the break with the West’s Catholic past (toppling of statues, changing of city names, etc.).

“(Viktor) Suvorov (Soviet defector) claimed that ‘grey terror’ would have a psychological warfare component. The Russian special services, he wrote, would launch a scandal parade. Dirt would be invented, created or dug up on America’s leaders, on America’s defense establishment and on America’s friends abroad. According to Suvorov, various nations would begin to distrust their leaders.”[1]

Whether or not it was Ghislaine Maxwell who set up Prince Andrew for kompromat (Soviet compromise, i.e. sexually), the Prince had other possible honeytrappers around him, with more direct ties to Russia (U.K. president Boris Johnson has plenty of his own ties to the Soviets). Take Jewish Kazakh socialite Goga Ashkenazi, alleged to be best friends with Prince Andrew[2] (and Nat Rothschild), the daughter of Soviet communist parents, carries a page from a 1,200-year-old Torah in her purse, and whose lover once included the son-in-law of Soviet satellite Khazakhstan’s president Nursultan Nazarbayev, an open Eurasian Unionist (code for neo-Soviet Union). Goga’s elite-connected father Erkin Zeinullayevich Berkaliev enriched his family by becoming the first appointed head of the Economics and Trade Department of the regional committee of the Communist Party Soviet Union. He was then recruited to Moscow’s Central Committee, under no other than Mikhail Gorbachev himself. Goga was educated in a Soviet school “hothoused in English”[3], which seems to suggest she was also a member of the Soviet communist youth (KOMSOMOL).

“‘The main question torturing every Kazakh girl is: how did this ordinary and not so pretty mamba [peasant girl] manage to get to the top of British society?ʼ”[4]

According to journalist Joshua Philipp, the Soviets used (and probably still use) the KOMSOMOL to recruit children for child-sex-trafficking rings used to entrap/blackmail Western VIPs.[5]

“… ‘Andropov is building networks for child trafficking and pedophilia, and this is a project the KGB has begun internationally, around the world,’ claims researcher J.R. Nyquist. “The purpose of the program was to seduce politicians and business leaders, then control them as agents through blackmail.”[6]

As sick as this is, it’s the height of illuminism—something Adam Weishaupt could only have dreamed of. It’s possible that Goga was groomed for this or perhaps as a conduit for other blackmail operators in London and around the world. I would venture to say that many of Epstein’s girls were extracted from the Soviet KOMSOMOL system. Israel itself is a pipeline for Slavic sex slaves, so the Soviet-Israel sex link is a natural fit for Soviet blackmail purposes. Epstein victim Virigina Guiffre (formerly Roberts) claims in court documents released earlier this year that Epstein fueled his poolside kompromat orgies by regularly flying in girls and women between the ages of 15-21 who sounded Russian or Czech. Epstein “forced underage girls to have sex with Prince Andrew to blackmail him,” Roberts says.[7]

“Girls as young as 14 were available for sex on the same terms. Many American men went there for just that reason. One American businessman of Russian descent told me, ‘Prostitution is legal here, and the age of consent is 16. If a policeman catches you with a 14-year-old, all you have to say is that she looked 16.’”[8]

Former Russian model Svetlana Pozhidaeva, the daughter of a Lieutenant Colonel in the Red Army and who herself attended a Moscow university thought to be an “incubator” for the KGB denies being at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion at the same time as Prince Andrew in 2010; however, she does admit to a long association with Epstein.[9]

Between 2013 and 2018, Epstein gave “suspicious” payments to alleged co-conspirators and to Russian models and females from Eastern Europe—seemingly as hush money and/or settlements, an investigation of Deutsche Bank has revealed.[10] The bank, which allowed Epstein to have accounts until 2018, was also fined as a result of its dealings with FBME Bank and Danske Estoina, which was involved with money laundering for Russian oligarchs, to the tune of €200 billion. President Donald Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen (Jewish), who admits that Trump colluded with the Kremlin to secure presidential victory and describes his former client as a liar, cheat, and fraud, also admits that he helped Trump deal with the females with whom he had affairs. “I stiffed contractors on his behalf, ripped off his business partners, lied to his wife Melania to hide his sexual infidelities, and bullied and screamed at anyone who threatened Trump’s path to power… From [a depraved act] in a sex club in Vegas, to tax fraud, to deals with corrupt officials from the former Soviet Union, to catch and kill conspiracies to silence Trump’s clandestine lovers, I wasn’t just a witness to the President’s rise – I was an active and eager participant.”[11]

The disdain these Soviet-Jewish criminals have for the Royal Family can be seen in Ghislaine Maxwell, whom Epstein victim Maria Farmer called the “most dangerous asset for Israel” and said was abusive towards Princess Diana.[12] Epstein victim Virginia Guiffre alleges that Epstein ordered her to have sex with Prince Andrew then, when she was 17 years old, on three occasions. The Prince denies these allegations.

With the level of Soviet active measures going on in the United Kingdom, it’s not difficult to fathom the Royal Family being ensnared by Russia’s kompromat, especially with the family’s moral vulnerabilities. What makes this scenario more possible is something which I suggested  in Part 5 of this series (written two years ago), that Soviet-Jewish British media mogul and Mossad-KGB superspy Robert Maxwell (late father of Ghislaine Maxwell) was pulling Epstein’s strings. Well, an alleged insider seems to suggest this very thing. According to the anonymous insider who spoke with The Sun, accused child sexual predator Jean-Luc Brunel (now a fugitive), a famed modelling scout and longtime acquaintance of Epstein, revealed Robert Maxwell’s ties to Epstein in a conversation some 20 years ago.

“Jean-Luc was telling them how Ghislaine’s father Robert Maxwell was one of the reasons why Jeffrey Epstein had money,” the source said.[13]

“He said Maxwell had been one of Epstein’s early investment clients. I assumed that Maxwell had invested in Epstein, who then used that money to make his own.”

Unsealed court documents revealed that Brunel once flew three 12-year-old girls from France as a birthday present for Epstein.[14]

Farmer claims that Epstein was of low intelligence; therefore, is the narrative that Epstein was a self-made Wall Street billionaire plausible or was he bankrolled by Maxwell and/or others? Why, then, would Maxwell invest in Epstein if not for something clandestine? Farmer corroborates my theory from Part 5 and the testimony of the alleged anonymous insider. After Robert Maxwell’s death, Farmer says “Epstein was assigned to take care of her (Ghislaine).”[15]

Farmer dropped several bombshells in her two interviews with apparent Marxist gatekeeper Whitney Webb. She said she remembers Ghislaine Maxwell telling her “that the Rothshilds were the greatest protectors of her family” and that Epstein had an Israeli passport. Maxwell’s finances are still a mystery, but we do know that the Jewish banking house JP Morgan managed at least $10 million of Ghislaine’s money. “All the people they raped were never Jewish” farmer added, suggesting that Epstein and Maxwell both strongly identified as Jewish.[16] At the very least, Ghislaine, Epstein, Petrina Khashoggi, and Lady Forester de Rothschild were members of private social network club A Small World.

I’ll just say a little bit about Whitney Webb, the self-described anti-globalist investigative journalist who seems to have risen to conspiracy fame suddenly and inorganically. It seems that she has taken on the Epstein story to control it on behalf of her apparent neo-Soviet handlers from down in Soviet-satellite South America, where she supposedly resides. She took on the story not long after I had completed Part 5 and apparently “expanded” on my investigative work. She is tied to Irano-Soviet outlets like Islamic-run Mint Press News, which I have written about. Webb puts an anti-Western, neo-Marxist spin on her writing and is featured on such sites as the pro-Kremlin Katehon, which also publishes the writings of alleged Epstein co-conspirator Alan M. Dershowitz, with whom Guiffre says she was forced to have sex while under age. Why would Webb, supposedly an exposer of Epstein, be featured alongside Epstein-tied Dershowitz and pro-Kremlin, Duginist shills? I can only think the answer is that she is a gatekeeper working on behalf of team kompromat. Dershowitz (Jewish) once wrote a column titled “Statutory rape in an outdated concept” and argued for the lowering of the age of consent to 15. (See my article on Dershowitz and controlled opposition Jewish shill Mike Cernovich).

Perhaps the biggest revelation Farmer made in her interviews with Webb was that Donald Trump was a co-conspirator of Epstein’s, to the point that Trump’s Czech-born ex-wife Ivana even assisted.

“Donald Trump’s ex-wife was always in the car (with Ghislaine Maxwell),” Farmer said of Maxwell’s procurement of high school girls in the Florida area and elsewhere. This fits the hypothesis I have been pushing since Part 1 of this series and now it has eyewitness testimony to back it up. Unfortunately, the mass media is not reporting on this game-changing story. The Left-wing media that supposedly hates Trump won’t touch this, let alone much of Trump’s numerous other ties to Epstein and the Maxwells. This shows that the media is actually gatekeeping for Trump, only revealing kosher-approved narratives against or for him.

It’s quite disturbing to imagine Ivana helping Ghislaine procure girls for Epstein and Trump while little Ivanka, then only 10 or 11 years old, is out and about with dad and Epstein, like the time at the Harley Davdison Cafe opening in in Manhattan in 1993 . Ivana apparently had no problem letting her own daughter be in the presence of not only Donald but, worse, the child-trafficking Epstein. Is this completely irresponsible parenting or is there something more to it? Could Ivanka, as I speculated in Part 1, somehow have been involved in sexual abuse at a young age? Perhaps she was participating in the procurement when she was older, even as an adult. She had immediate access to the prettiest females in the world while working in the modelling business herself when she was a teenager. It’s hard to believe that Trump and Epstein (and Ivana?) would not have exploited this opportunity.

Ivana’s Czech father was a “confidant” of Soviet Czech intelligence (Státní bezpečnost or StB). This fact came out in a 2016 article detailing the communist Czechs’ surveillance of Trump and his then wife Ivana.[17] The article went on to say that a spy revealed in 1977 that Trump’s businesses in the Soviet satellite were “absolutely safe” because they received commissions from the state. Trump’s apparent free pass in Czechoslovakia aligns with the notion that he has a free pass in Russia, too.

“In 1988, a further informant working under the cover name “Milos” reported that Trump was being put under considerable pressure to run for the U.S. presidency. The Czech authorities should be made aware, he said, that Ivana was under pressure herself to not put a step wrong during visits to Czechoslovakia, or else she risked putting her husbandʼs potential candidacy in jeopardy.

“‘Any false step of hers will have incalculable consequences for the position of her husband who intends to run for president in 1996,’ Milos wrote. He added that Trump was convinced he could win the presidency.[18]

On one of Trump’s trips to the Soviet Union, upon return, he published an anti-NATO advertisement in a major newspaper.

“A note by an StB spy named ‘Al Jarda’ of 10 October 1989 details a visit made to Trump by a delegation from a communist agricultural production cooperative from Slusovice, the village where Ivana Trumpʼs father lived.”

We can see here that Trump was groomed into his current position, not something he strove for as the all-American, self-made billionaire we have all been led to believe. It seems that the apparent kompromat on Trump was attained long ago, decades before he would get to fulfill his role as a Soviet stooge. Trump may have been given directives to bid for President after a 1988 trip to Moscow.

“Trump took an all-expenses-paid jaunt to the Soviet Union in July to discuss building the Russians some luxury hotels. The Soviets ‘treated me beautifully,’ he told reporters. ‘The government would like me to build a major hotel in Moscow in quality and in style like Trump Tower’—the garish structure which Trump built on Manhattan’s Fifth Avenue.

“Shortly after Trump’s return to the United States, Mike Dunbar, a well known Republican Party organizer in New Hampshire unveiled plans to enter Trump in the 1988 New Hampshire Republican primary.”[19]

We can also see why Ivana, who apparently grew up in a communist village, withdrew her initial claim that Trump raped her, as it might have been devastating to his candidacy for U.S. president. Evidently, she was following the orders of her Soviet handlers.

Interestingly, Ivana, who was a model herself, spoke Czech with her children, which we have to assume included Ivanka. We have seen several photos of Ivanka with several of Trump’s Russian-Jewish oligarch cohorts and others. Perhaps her role in this sordid affair is larger than it seems.

Speaking of Trump and teen models, Cohen tells a story in his book Disloyal: A Memoir about Trump whistling at his daughter Samantha, then 15, while she played tennis. “What a piece of ass. I would love some of that,” Trump is alleged to have remarked. “After Cohen told Trump that she was his daughter, he allegedly replied ‘when did she get so hot?’, and then beckoned her over to come and kiss him on the cheek.”[20] In Part 1 of this series I talked about Trump having eyes for then 12-year-old Paris Hilton. Christopher Mason, a former friend of Ghislaine Maxwell, claimed the alleged child procurer wanted to recruit Hilton for Epstein.[21] All three, Hilton, Trump, and Maxwell, are seen in a photograph together allegedly at a fashion show in New York in 2000. It’s unclear how old Hilton was when Maxwell is said to have wanted to recruit her, but Trump has admitted to first seeing Hilton when she was 12, at which age he thought she was “hot”. By the way, many of the photographs of Trump with Epstein, Maxwell, and Prince Andrew that have been released on wires such as Getty Images were taken by Davidoff Studios, a Russian-based photography company. Might the studio be a KGB asset using the cover of photo journalism? How many more compromising photos might it have?

Another suspected Mossad-KGB kompromat recruit, possibly via Epstein, is Monica Lewinsky, the famed Whitehouse intern who brought down Bill Clinton (according to an account in the book A Covenient Death: The Mysterious Demise of Jeffrey Epstein, Clinton is accused of having an affair with Ghislaine Maxwell). Lewinsky is of Soviet-Jewish extraction (surprise, surprise). Russian Jew Kirill Gilyarov seems to suspect that Lewinsky may have been a Chabad Lubavitch asset. “It’s curious that M. Lewinsky’s cousin, Mikhail, is a native of the USSR, now living in Belarus, near Vitebsk, an area of traditional Chabad influence.” In Part 1, briefly I talked about Ghislaine Maxwell attending Chelsea Clinton’s wedding. Chabad (see Part 4), it seems, is a KGB-Mossad channel for intelligence and organized crime. It’s primary financier is Trump associate Lev Leviev, a Soviet Jew. Leviev provided jewellery to Trump’s ex-wife Ivana at her wedding to Rossano Rubicondi.

What else is curious is that Trump visited Israel in 1989 (perhaps in 1981 as well) when Yitzhak Shamir was Prime Minister.[22] Shamir (see Part 5) happened to be a crony of Chabad supporter Robert Maxwell’s. To return the favour, it seems, Putin’s rabbi Berel Lazar, of Chabad persuasion, visited Trump Tower in 2016, the year alleged to have been when much of the Trump-Russia collusion activity took place. Putin’s not the only one with his own rabbi. Trump’s late father Fred is known to have called Beach Haven rabbi Israel Wagner “my rabbi”.[23] Wagner happens to be of Soviet-Jewish extraction (see Part 4 for more on the Trumps’ ties to Chabad and Jewry). Another former Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Barak (discussed in Part 5 as associated with Epstein), was Epstein’s business partner until as late as 2015, only a year before the U.S. election. The former PM was even photographed at Epstein’s New York estate and, according to neighbours, regularly crashed at Epstein’s Upper East side apartment.[24] Former Israeli Mossad case officer Victor Ostrovsky claims to have witnessed wild orgies going on at Mossad headquarters. Was Barak a participant in Epstein’s child-sex orgies?

With the Trump’s decades-long loyalty to world Jewry, it’s difficult to imagine that the Trumps are not Jewish (Trump-Jewish connections discussed at length in Part 4). As time goes on, we learn more and more about the Trumps. Was Freddy Trump’s love for Chabad in New York merely opportunistic or was it kinship? According to a recent New York Times article, “When he (Fred junior) enrolled at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, the boy with blond hair who had attended an Episcopalian boys’ preparatory school on Long Island joined a Jewish fraternity… ‘It may have been Freddy’s first attempt to make his own statement to his father,’ said his best friend at Lehigh, Bruce Turry, who, like several other former fraternity brothers, remembered Freddy claiming that his father, the son of German immigrants, was Jewish.” If the Trump’s are not ethnic Jews, one thing for sure is that they are obedient Noahides in the dark spirit of the Talmud. Donald and his family certainly have an affinity for the Kabbalah and there is a high probability that he is a freemason.

Notes:

[1] Nyquist, J.R., Grey Terror, 13 May 2004, Financial Sense – https://www.financialsense.com/contributors/jr-nyquist/grey-terror

[2] Palmer, Mark and Stewart, William, Best friends with Prince Andrew and mistress of a £28m London mansion

– Goga Ashkenazi hasn’t done badly for a ‘peasant girl’ from Kazakhstan, March 8, 2010, The Daily Mail.

[3] ibid

[4] ibid

[5] Philipp, Joshua, Researcher Reports Soviets Created Child-Trafficking Rings in the West for Blackmail, February 19, 2018, The Epoch Times.

[6] ibid

[7] Jeffrey Epstein ‘forced underage girls to have sex with Prince Andrew to blackmail him’, The Daily Mail, August 6, 2020 – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8582575/Jeffrey-Epstein-forced-underage-girls-sex-Prince-Andrew-blackmail-him.html

[8] Ruppert, Michael C., Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire and the End of the Age of Oil, 2004, New Society Publishers, pg. 93

[9] Was Russian model linked to ‘sex trafficker’ Jeffrey Epstein in his New York lair at the same time as Prince Andrew? Questions over glamorous woman seen leaving Manhattan home, 31 August 2019, The Daily Mail – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7414941/Was-Russian-model-linked-sex-trafficker-Epsteins-lair-time-Prince-Andrew.html

[10] Smith, Jennifer, Deutsche Bank is fined $150million for failing to intervene as Jeffrey Epstein made suspicious payments to Russian models, settled lawsuits and paid girls’ tuition and rent after his 2008 conviction for child sex abuse, The Daily Mail, July 7, 2020.

[11] Leonard, Tom, Trump compared to mob boss and branded a lying sex cheat in bombshell book by lawyer, The Daily Mail, August 15, 2020 – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8629325/Trump-compared-mob-boss-branded-lying-sex-cheat-bombshell-book-lawyer.html

[12] Farmer, Maria, Epstein Victim Maria Farmer Speaks With Whitney Webb, Full Phone Call – Part 1, The Last American Vagabond, April 24, 2020 – https://www.bitchute.com/video/MGtDj8drWvE/

[13] Sheets, Megan, Jeffrey Epstein ‘was secretly bankrolled’ by Ghislaine Maxwell’s disgraced newspaper baron father Robert, sworn testimony claims, The Daily Mail, 13 September 2020 – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8728393/Jeffrey-Epstein-secretly-bankrolled-newspaper-baron-Robert-Maxwell-Ghislaines-father.html

[14] Sheets, Megan, Next Top Model scout Jean-Luc Brunel flew three poor 12-year-old triplets in from France as a BIRTHDAY PRESENT for Jeffrey Epstein to abuse, unsealed documents claim, 19 August 2019, The Daily Mail – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7371693/Jean-Luc-Brunel-gave-Jeffrey-Epstein-three-poor-12-year-old-triplets-France-birthday-present.html

[15] Farmer, Maria, Epstein Victim Maria Farmer Speaks With Whitney Webb, Full Phone Call – Part 2, The Last American Vagabond, May 26, 2020 – https://www.bitchute.com/video/kItJSpQeyCg/

[16] ibid

[17] Connolly, Kate, Czechoslovakia spied on Donald and Ivana Trump, communist-era files show, 15 December 2016, The Guardian – https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/15/czechoslovakia-spied-on-donald-trump-ivana-files

[18] ibid

[19] Klenetsky, Kathleen, Do the Russians have a Trump card?, 14 July 1987, Executive Intelligence Review

[20] Michael Cohen ‘laughs as friend guesses his daughter’s breast size’, The Daily Mail, Sept. 20, 2020 – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8735155/Michael-Cohen-heard-laughing-friend-tries-guess-daughter-Samanthas-breast-size.html

[21] Ghislaine Maxwell ‘tried to recruit Paris Hilton for Epstein’, The Daily Mail, August 7, 2020 –  https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8604711/Ghislaine-Maxwell-wanted-recruit-young-Paris-Hilton-Epstein.html

[22] Aderet, Ofer, Trump visited Israel in 1989 while Robert Maxwell crony Yitzhak Shamir was Prime Minister, Haaretz, May 10, 2017 – https://fitzinfo.net/2020/08/16/trump-visited-israel-in-1989/

[23] Levine, Jon, How Donald Trump’s developer dad and a Brooklyn rabbi saved a synagogue, New York Post, Oct. 17, 2020 – https://nypost.com/2020/10/17/how-trumps-developer-dad-and-a-brooklyn-rabbi-saved-a-synagogue/

[24] Jerusalem Post Staff, Ehud Barak crashed at Epstein’s apt. regularly, neighbors say – report, 6 August 2019, The Jerusalem Post – https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/politics-and-diplomacy/ehud-barak-crashed-at-epsteins-apt-regularly-neighbors-say-report-597820

By Rebecca Davis O’Brien
Wall Street Journal
Sept. 18, 2020 Anno Domini

NEW YORK—Federal prosecutors in Manhattan have filed new criminal charges against associates of Rudy Giuliani who were arrested in a campaign-finance case last fall, including fraud allegations related to a Florida fraud-insurance company founded by two of the men.

In an indictment unsealed Thursday, prosecutors alleged that Lev Parnas—a Soviet-born businessman who worked with Mr. Giuliani to push for investigations that could benefit President Trump—duped potential investors in the company, Fraud Guarantee, by misrepresenting how much the company had raised and where the money was going.

At least seven people invested in Fraud Guarantee, for a total of more than $2 million—much of which, prosecutors alleged, went toward personal expenses for Mr. Parnas and his partner, David Correia, who was also charged.

Prosecutors also added addi- tional charges related to alleged schemes charged last fall to vio- late the federal ban on political donations by foreign nationals and to obstruct an inquiry by the Federal Election Commission.

The charges stem from an in- vestigation by the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office and the FBI into the men’s business dealings and political activities, including efforts involving Mr. Giuliani that were at the heart of impeach- ment proceedings against Mr. Trump last year. Mr. Giuliani, Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer, wasn’t charged or named in the indictment and has denied wrongdoing.

Joseph Bondy, a lawyer for Mr. Parnas, said the superseding indictment “contains no surprises.” He said: “We are pleased that the matter can now move forward.” A lawyer for Mr. Correia didn’t re- spond to a request for comment.

Messrs. Parnas and Correia, along with businessmen Igor Fruman and Andrey Kukushkin, were arrested in October on charges that they conspired to funnel money to U.S. politicians or make illegal contributions of their own. Each pleaded not guilty.

CORRECTION (May 10, 2017): The State Archive has since retracted its claim that Trump visited Israel in 1981. It explained that the documents reflect preparations for a visit and not the visit itself. A further search did not turn up evidence that the visit took place.

Amid discussions between Israel and the White House on a possible visit by President Donald Trump, the state archives released a file Thursday detailing the president’s little-known first visit to the Jewish state almost 30 years ago, in 1989.

The so-called “Trump File” reveals that the Foreign Ministry attached great importance to the billionaire tycoon’s upcoming visit, even though there were no signs that could predict that he would be president one day.

Referring to Trump, a Foreign Ministry document from early July, 1989 states that “he is only willing to come at the invitation of the Prime Minister or Foreign Minister.” The ministry wanted to find out from the Israeli embassy in Washington if Trump had received an official invitation, and if so, in whose name and in what words.

The year was 1989 and Israel was celebrating 41 years of independence. Leading the country were Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir and President Chaim Herzog, Yitzhak Rabin was defense minister and Moshe Arens held the foreign affairs portfolio.

Ahead of the visit, the Foreign Ministry was asked to prepare a schedule that would make Trump’s visit enjoyable, while including efforts to interest him in investing in the country.

Among the projects that Trump showed an interest in during his visit was building a casino in Eilat. In the Trump file, one of the documents notes that this was the “practical reason” for Trump’s visit, “since that is Mr. Trump’s field.”

Trump, who was 43 at the time, arrived in Israel on July 29, 1989 on his private jet.  An unnamed deputy minister – probably Yossi Beilin, then-Finance Minister Shimon Peres’s deputy – welcomed the tycoon at the airport.

The next morning Trump had breakfast with Beilin and Teddy Kollek, the mayor of Jerusalem. They then went on a tour of Jerusalem’s Old City, several museums and Bethlehem, which was under full Israeli control at that time, before the establishment of the Palestinian Authority.

After lunch Trump flew to the Dead Sea, accompanied by Peres, where the billionaire was presented with a development project. He then flew to an area in the northern Negev desert that had been constructed for people who had been evacuated seven years earlier from the Israeli settlement of Yamit in Sinai. Trump also visited a moshav and a kibbutz and asked to see a playground he had donated to the Jewish National Fund.

Trump then traveled to Mitzpe Ramon in the Negev desert and visited the Ramon military base. He finished the day in Eilat, where he watched the sunset and dined at the Neptune Hotel, followed by a nighttime tour of the Red Sea resort town.

According to plan, Trump started his second day with a dive at the coral reef reserve in Eilat. He then attended to business, visiting several potential sites for investment – including an airport – and examined opportunities for investing in Tel Aviv and Herzliya. After meeting with then-Prime Minister Shamir, Trump returned to the U.S. by the end of the day.

The documents kept in the state archive’s Trump file also include quotes sent to the Foreign Ministry by different upscale hotels competing for the opportunity to host Trump. Hyatt Regency in Jerusalem, boasting a deluxe 5-star rating, offered a “room facing Jerusalem’s magnificent views, a fruit basket and a daily newspaper.” Ultimately, however, another hotel had the honor of hosting the billionaire. A letter to the Foreign Ministry from the Laromme Hotel confirms the reservation for the corresponding dates.

The hotel made some concessions to its guests, saying that it would only charge Peres the rates for a regular room while giving him a suite. This implies that Trump and Peres slept at the same hotel during the businessman’s visit.

The question of who invited Trump and why is answered in a letter by journalist Mira Avrech, also kept in the archives. Three people claimed to have initiated the invitation: former Prime Minister Shamir, former Finance Minister Peres and former Eilat Mayor Rafi Hochman. According to Avrech, all three are correct since they indeed all invited Trump, albeit on different occasions. Considering purchasing El Al, Trump was keen to visit. Due to his concerns about internal Israeli politics, however, he requested an official invitation. The invitation was signed by Israel’s then-ambassador to the U.S., Moshe Arad, in the name of the prime minister and his substitute.

By Michael Collins Piper
The Judas Goats: The Enemy Within
American Free Press (2006)
Excerpt: pages 159-171

The contents of much of this chapter will come as a shock to modern-day American anti-communists (and particularly those who were active in supporting Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy, the famed communist hunter) but certain facts must be made a part of recorded history if we are to have a faithful profile of The Enemy Within.

But first, the story of a controversial figure who played a secret (and actually quite bizarre) role in helping John F. Kennedy win the presidency in 1960—one of the legendary, behind-the-scenes figures in the American nationalist movement—DeWest Hooker, who died at age 81 in Washington, D.C. on September 22, 1999.

Hooker—“West” to his friends—is now a part of history (hidden history) and his remarkable story is worth telling for the record, particularly since Hooker’s own experiences help us document the work of America’s Zionist Judas Goats.

About Hooker himself: A fascinating and memorable man who well deserves this brief tribute. Born to wealth and privilege, and later married into an immensely wealthy family, Hooker was a graduate of Cornell and a veteran of World War II—a war that he believed then and until his dying day was a war that need not and should not have been fought. Hooker devoted much of his personal fortune to fighting for the nationalist cause, a cause that he never abandoned.

In his early years, the floridly handsome Hooker was not only a Broadway actor but also an advertising model appearing in advertisements for Chesterfield cigarettes and wearing an eye patch in the famous Hathaway shirt advertisements.

However, Hooker gave up a promising career on the stage, after having been offered Henry Fonda’s lead role in the road tour of the Broadway hit, Command Decision, preferring to work behind the scenes in the entertainment industry.

Hooker ultimately went to work as a talent agent for the Music Corporation of America (MCA) and in the early 1950’s was one of the highest-paid talent agents in America. His focus was on the burgeoning arena of television production.

Hooker was particularly proud of his efforts to promote “black entertainment” for “black audiences,” encouraging the artistic endeavors of black singers and actors. At the same time, however, Hooker thoroughly rejected the concept that black music and black culture should be promoted to white audiences, a guiding principle of the “multi-cultural” music and motion pictures promoters of today.

(Hooker was particularly enthusiastic about the increasing prominence in the mid-1980s of Minister Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, and this author first met Minister Farrakhan while accompanying Hooker to a by-invitation-only rally of the Nation of Islam in Washington, D.C. in 1985.)

For a period, one of the MCA contracts under Hooker’s domain was that of a former “B” movie actor-turned-television star, Ronald Reagan— although that detail is left out of Reagan’s official biographies in light of Hooker’s future “infamy” and reputation as an “anti-Semite.”

However, a “secret” description of Hooker’s relationship with Reagan’s rise to prominence appears in a little-known book entitled The King Maker, published in 1972—eight years before Reagan reached the presidency. Written by Henry Denker, a well-known New York writer, producer and director with wide “inside” knowledge of the show busi- ness industry, The King Maker was a roman a clef (that is, a “fictional” novel based on real-life characters and events, thinly disguised). Everyone knew it was about the behind-the-scenes story of Ronald Reagan’s political and financial dealings with the MCA agency and how those dealings helped bring Reagan to the governorship of California.

The book is not easy to find in the libraries or even in second hand bookstores.That may well be precisely because of the fact that—if you read between the lines (or not even necessarily between the lines)— you’ll discover some unpleasant things about Reagan and the people who made him into the American political powerhouse of the last quarter of the 20th century.

Hooker was the real-life model for one of the characters in the book, “Carl Brewster,” a frankly anti-Jewish television industry executive and let it be said, frankly, that West Hooker himself was very anti-Jewish and made no effort to hide it.

In The King Maker, Reagan is “Jeff Jefferson,” a has-been former movie actor who is catapulted into the California governorship through his association with Dr. Irwin Cone, the founder of a mob-connected booking agency, the Talent Corporation of America (TCA), which emerges a political force in its own right. Denker’s “Dr. Cone” is the real-life Dr. Jules Stein, and TCA is really—you guessed it—the Music Corporation of America, better known as the media giant MCA (now a subsidiary of the ever-growing Bronfman empire). Evidently the book was too much on the mark, so much so that Dr. Stein’s real life partner, Lew Wasserman, described the novel as “a piece of garbage” even though Wasserman isn’t even characterized in the novel at all.

In 1986, another writer, Dan Moldea, known for his expertise in the history of organized crime, wrote his own book that was no roman a clef, but was, in fact, a controversial non-fiction work that told the same story told in Denker’s The King Maker. However, Moldea’s book was more explosively—and perhaps more accurately—titled Dark Victory: Ronald Reagan, MCA, and the Mob.

In any case, Hooker’s anti-Semitism did not go over well with his bosses, Lew Wasserman and Jules Stein, and ultimately Hooker had a parting of the ways with MCA (only to have his MCA years memorialized in Denker’s book). However, Hooker, through his own ingenuity, managed to walk away from MCA a very rich man and actually was able to outwit Wasserman of MCA to the point that Hooker was later described in print by show business columnist Walter Winchell as the only one of MCA’s employees who ever outfoxed Wasserman.

In personal conversations Winchell was known to say, more candidly, that Hooker was the “only goy” (i.e. non-Jew) to have accomplished that feat, although Winchell’s additional language was far more gutteral in describing what Hooker had done to his former employer.

Hooker later moved toward setting up a “fourth” television network in the mid-1950’s, much to the distress of the media elite. Hooker candidly admitted that his project was designed to be the first “non- Jewish-controlled” television network.

Although he actively solicited the financial backing of Ambassador Joseph P. Kennedy (father of then-Senator John F. Kennedy) for the project, the founder of the Kennedy dynasty refused to participate (although he wholeheartedly supported the concept). Kennedy said that his participation would enrage the Jewish community and would endanger his son’s chances of winning the presidency. Hooker’s first-hand reminiscences of his then-secret meeting with Kennedy were told in detail for the first time in this author’s work, Final Judgment.

In any case, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith learned of Hooker’s effort to organize a “fourth” network and in 1954 the ADL devoted a two-page spread in its bulletin to “exposing” Hooker under the title “The Case of the Charming Bigot.” The title itself was quite revealing about Hooker’s dynamism: Even the ADL, so disposed to smearing people and casting aspersions on their character, was forced to acknowledge that Hooker was possessed of an engaging personality that just wouldn’t quit.

Ultimately, New York State Attorney General (and later U.S. Senator) Jacob Javits, a corrupt and vicious Jewish ally of the ADL, issued an injunction preventing Hooker from raising funds for the network,thereby killing the project on behalf of the other Zionist-run networks.

Although Hooker then left the United States and went into self-imposed exile in Italy where he made a fortune in the soda bottling business, he returned to this country in the mid-1980s to resume his political endeavors.

For many years, Hooker was working quietly behind the scenes in an energetic effort to set in place an international petroleum distribution network—in concert with sympathetic interests in the Arab world— that would provide funding for the American nationalist movement. Unfortunately, however, Hooker’s efforts were frustrated by figures in a certain Arab regime that had been co-opted by Israel’s intelligence agency, the Mossad. In fact, one of Hooker’s working partners in the project was murdered.

Hooker himself had the benefit of living on the proceeds of a trust fund provided to him by his mother and had no desire whatsoever to reap any profit for himself from the oil venture which, if successfully launched, would have, by his estimate, provided a minimum of $10,000,000 per year for the nationalist cause.

Sadly, although Hooker was quite physically fit, almost until his death, Hooker’s sharp mind fell victim to the onset of age and his memory began to fail.This was a great tragedy for it prevented him from ever putting down the complete record of his remarkable career in writing or on video, although, fortunately, some of his writings have survived.

Amazingly, although he suffered for five years from the prostate cancer which had spread throughout his body and which ultimately killed him, Hooker was quite active and just several months before his death appeared at a public meeting in Arlington, Virginia (where this author, Michael Collins Piper, spoke) earning Hooker a final attack upon him by his enemies in a published report about the meeting by the Southern Poverty Law Center of Morris Dees. Hooker, frankly, was delighted to know that his endeavors were still being recorded by his sworn enemies. “Jesus was no sissy,” Hooker would often say. “He marched right in and threw the money changers out of the temple.”

In any case, Hooker was a remarkable man indeed.And what he discovered during the 1950s about the Zionist effort to control the “anti-communist” movement—information we are now about to detail—will be an amazing and eye-opening and very much sobering revelation for modern-day Americans who have never known the real story.

What follows is the text (slightly annotated for purposes of clarity) of a sworn statement that Hooker executed on September 30, 1954 outlining his findings about the role of the self-styled “American Jewish League Against Communism” and how it was manipulating then Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy’s efforts to investigate communism in high places in the American system.The affidavit reads:

I had an astounding interview for two hours some time ago with Norman L. Marks of the American Jewish League Against Communism, Inc.

As a matter of fact, I was brought along by another party, and Mr. Marks did not know anything about me (hence he really opened up because the person who took me was “trusted” by him).

The AJLAC has offices at 220 West 42nd Street, New York City. Its national chairman is Alfred Kohlberg. Its executive director is Rabbi Benjamin Schultz, and its treasurer is Harry Pasternak. Listed on its national board are the following: Bern Dibner, Lawrence Fertig,Theodore Fine, Benjamin Gitlow, Hon. Walter R. Hart, Herman Kashins, Eugene Lyons, Norman L. Marks, Morris Ryskind, Rabbi David S. Savitz, Nathan D. Shapiro, George E. Sokolsky, Maurice Tishman, Rabbi Ascher M.Yager.

I swear under oath to you that the following is as accurate as it is possible to put down from memory an hour or so later. Also, the information can be verified by the other unnamed party.

Mr. Marks, listed above and on the letterhead of the AJLAC as a member of the national board, said: “Far and away the principal financial contributor to the AJLAC is Mr. Bernard Baruch. ”When questioned on this point as to what percentage he would say Mr. Baruch contributed, he answered:“About 85% or 90% of the funds.”

I said that I had thought Mr. Kohlberg was the main contributor to the AJLAC and Mr. Marks answered: “Well, he contributes some but nothing like what Baruch contributes.” I asked Mr. Marks why Baruch’s name did not appear on the letterhead. He stated that Baruch was very emphatic about NOT having his name appear on the letter- head, and that it was to be unknown that he contributed funds to it.

Mr. Marks said that the organization was entirely Jewish but that a funny thing was that many of the founders of its seemed to have “Christian” wives. He said that they used to meet every Thursday at the Ambassador Hotel for lunch and talk about the world situation. Marks said that the organization would not accept either a“Christian in it”or a“Christian dime of support” and that no Christian money had ever been accepted in the past—that it was completely a Jewish organization and financed by them.

He said there were only two purposes for its founding: That the Number One purpose was to take the heat off the Jewishness of Communism, and a secondary aim was to get the Jews out of Communism and to support Zionism. He said that: “for a while there, almost all the spies of the Communists that were turned up were Jews and that they had become concerned, and thought that something should be done to take the sting off the Jews.They wanted to show the Christian world that ALL Jews were not Communists.”

When asked just how they went about this whole project, Mr. Marks said: “It’s impossible for a Christian to get away with criticizing the Jews. Only a Jew can do that.”

He went on: “And so we got together a strong group of Jews that “were known to be anti-Communists” and started our campaign of pressure from our point of view.”

[According to Hooker’s original affidavit, Marks’ reference to those who were said to be “anti-Communists” actually meant that the Jewish leaders in question were, as Hooker put it, “meaning anti-Stalinist.”—Ed.]

Marks stated: “We were the ones that wrote the speeches for McCarthy back in West Virginia that started his build- up into the famous anti-Communist that he is today. Our pressure on the press resulted in his getting as much attention as he has. In return for this build-up he agreed not to call up or expose Jews in the Communist movement by the investigations through his sub-committee.”

Mr. Marks stated that a lot of Jews called McCarthy an anti-Semite but little did they know that “he is the best friend the Jews ever had.”

[Hooker noted of McCarthy that “Eventually they destroyed him anyway when he started calling up Jewish Communists later on.”—Ed.]

Marks went on to say that “other investigations might have turned up Jews and McCarthy had been given credit for them, but that if we traced the record back, we would find that McCarthy actually did not call up a single Jew in that period when the heat was on the Jews.” He later qualified these remarks by saying that“while McCarthy was operating as a temporary subcommittee under the Truman administation, he did not call up any Jews; that when he once got himself elected as the chairman of the permanent investigating committee, in the new administration, he then began to call witnesses “as they came.”

[That is, whether the witnesses were “Jewish or not,” according to Hooker—Ed.]

Mr, Marks continued: “But that doesn’t make much difference now because he accepted our own men to work right with him. For example, he accepted as his top man next to him our man Roy Cohn, which was arranged through another of our men, George Sokolsky.”

If memory serves me correctly, Marks stated that Julius Kahn was also their man on the McCarthy committee, but who was now on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He definitely stated that David Schine was NOT with the AJLAC but that he was put there by “another group which I don’t know about.”

Mr. Marks went on to say that “not only is McCarthy under our control but so are Jenner and Velde, who also took our men to work right with them. Benny Mandel and Robert Morris represent us on the Jenner Committee.” He mentioned Robert Kunzig as “their man” for Velde.

Marks also stated definitely that Professor Louis Budenz was under “their control” and one of “their men,” and that he was working to take the “heat” off the Jews.

[Budenz was a well-known “ex-communist” who became a leading figure in the so-called anti-communist movement, key elements of which had come under the control of the Zionist and Trotskyite elements. Hooker’s revelations explain why—Ed.]

He stated that [Alfred] Kohlberg, their national chairman, was the one who “found” Budenz when he was testifying in Washington and Kohlberg “picked him up and practically supported him for a while in order to get him started and built up to the man he is today in the anti-Communist movement.”

Marks also stated that they got “their man Robert Morris”elected recently as a judge in NewYork City,and that Victor Lasky was another one of their men who did a lot of “press work” for them, and “made speeches favoring their people, for example, Robert Morris.” He said, “All these people agreed to take the ‘heat’ off the Jews.”

I recall now another statement by Mr. Marks that “there is a vast pooling of information in the New York City area and throughout the country which is connected with our organization.”

I asked if J. B. Matthews and his files were in on “the deal” and he said: “Yes, we have access to all of his files.”

[J. B. Matthews was a prominent “anti-communist crusader” in the period, but, clearly, under the control of the Zionist-Trotskyites.—Ed.]

He said that they have at least “thirty Communists on our payroll who report information to us,” and that “we know everything that goes on in this field.”

Mr, Marks told all the above information as if there was nothing “wrong” with what he was saying. He even invited me and this other unnamed fellow to go to a meeting the following Tuesday night at the University Club, sponsored by Norman Lombard.

When they finally found out who I was, however, I was told by Norman Lombard and Norman Marks not to come to the meeting. I sure hope that the true patriotic American nationalists will be able to straighten out a few of these “pseudo-patriots” who are trying to lead the so-called “anti- communist” movement.

Don’t misunderstand me: I’m just as anti-Communist as any of you, but I don’t want our country to be led head-long into traps which enable these pseudo-patriots to “use” the fine instincts of the American people and the anti- Communist movement for their own diabolical ends.

In other words, some of these pseudo-patriots are “anti-Communist,” meaning “anti-Stalin communism,” but are pro- as hell another form of Communism (American brand) leading to dictatorship by them in our own country and the rest of the world under Bernard Baruch and the crowd he represents.

[The “American brand” of communism to which Hooker referred, although he didn’t say it directly, was precisely the Trotskyite brand, then in its evolution, that has come today to be known as “neo-conservatism.”—Ed.]

(Signed) DeWest Hooker END OF HOOKER AFFIDAVIT

So we have DeWest Hooker to thank for having spotted, early on, that there was much more to the rise of “anti-communism” in America, at least in the form approved by the Zionist and Trotskyite elements. It is vital that Hooker’s revelations be fully understood today. What adds amazing further credibility to Hooker’s shocking revelations about the manipulation of Sen. McCarthy is the point made by famed organized crime writer Hank Messick in his book, John Edgar Hoover, a less than flattering portrait of the longtime FBI director which delved into Hoover’s ties to the organized crime syndicate. Messick wrote about the founding of the aforementioned American Jewish League Against Communism:

Varied were the motives of the League’s founding, but one of them was self-protection. . . . Many of the intellectuals in America were Jewish. During the New Deal some had achieved high position. Moreover, Karl Marx himself was the son of a Jew who later became a Christian.To adopt the sane position, to resist unfair smears and the attempts of bigots to portray the Jew as pro-red, might only make people mad. Better to go on the offensive against the Communist menace itself. Such was the attitude of some Jews—or at least the excuse they offered their friends—as national hysteria built up in 1948.

The possibility of the anti-Communism attack turning into a persecution of the Jews was very much on the minds of the government officials charged with prosecuting the alleged atom bomb spies, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. For that reason a Jewish judge was chosen, and the prosecuting staff selected to try the case was composed of Jews. One of their members was Roy Cohn.

More than concern for the Jews was involved in the formation of the League, however. Anti-Communism offered both political and business opportunities.

The League was formed at the home of Eugene Lyons, a right-wing author of note.Taking part in the first meeting were other right-wingers, including Louis Waldman, Lawrence Fertiz, Isaac Don Levine, and George Sokolsky.The prime mover was Alfred Kohlberg who, along with Lewis Rosenstiel, supplied most of the funds.

According to Messick, Kohlberg had long had business interests in China and now, as leader of what came to be known, in part, as “The China Lobby,” hoped to stoke up a war against China—in the name of “fighting communism”—in order to win back his lost source of lucre.

Rosenstiel, a liquor baron with long-standing ties to the organized crime syndicate of Jewish mob boss Meyer Lansky, had his own interests in mind. Rosenstiel had procured big supplies of liquor prior to World War II and then profited immensely (when, during the war, government- imposed limits on the production of liquor, effectively gave him a quite profitable monopoly on liquor supplies). So, with the possibility of a new war against China (or even Russia or both), Rosenstiel evidently dreamed of repeating his previous success.

As such, Rosenstiel and Kohlberg and their Zionist allies initially lined up behind 1948 Republican presidential candidate Thomas E. Dewey (who had long been quietly allied with the Lansky Crime Syndicate, Dewey’s reputation as a “gang-buster” notwithstanding). Although, of course, President Harry Truman is largely remembered as the American president who recognized Israel upon its founding in 1948, the truth is that there were many “insiders” in the Truman administration, including Truman himself, who were not quite so enthusiastic about giving the nod to Israel, recognizing—quite presciently—the dangers of setting up a Zionist state on land stolen from the native Christian and Muslim Palestinian people. As a result of this, the Zionist movement was less than enthusiastic about Truman and was quietly working on behalf of Thomas E. Dewey.

However, to the surprise of virtually everyone—with the possible exception of Truman himself—Dewey did not defeat Truman. And this set the stage for the virtual “creation” of no less than Senator Joseph R. McCarthy as the unwitting voice for the Zionist and Trotskyite elements. Messick fills in the details:

The unexpected defeat of Dewey in 1948 upset a good many people, and made it necessary for the American Jewish League Against Communism to revise its program. It needed a new political figure behind whom it could rally. Coincidentally, the league had come into possession of a one-hundred page FBI report on Communist influence on government. The report was originally leaked to an intelligence officer in the Pentagon with instructions to pass it on to leaders of the league . . . We have the word of none other than Roy Cohn that the secret FBI document was read, and conferences held, in New York and Washington. As Cohn put it, “a small group” took “upon itself the responsibility of getting the story across to America.”

The League decided it should approach a senator rather than a representative. At a meeting in Washington in November 1949, a special committee of the league “sifted carefully through the roster of United States senators for one who might successfully undertake the task of educating his fellow Americans. ”They narrowed the list down to four possibilities, all Republicans. In turn, each senator was given a look at the FBI report. Each was urged to go on the warpath. Each was promised financial support. The first three men on the list refused.The fourth took the document home and read it carefully. Next morning he called a member of the League and told him he was “buying the package.” That fourth senator was Joseph McCarthy.

Not long afterword, on February 9, 1950 McCarthy spoke before the Ohio County Women’s Republican Club in Wheeling, West Virginia and announced that there were 205 “security risks” in the State Department. And so it was that the “McCarthy Era”—which the Zionists today so hypocritically denounce—was launched. In fact, as we have seen, the McCarthy period was hardly more than the effective work of The Enemy Within.

And although McCarthy was very much correct, it seems, in pointing out that there were indeed “communists in the government,” it is probably safe to say that the war that was being fought out on Capitol Hill during the McCarthy hearings and in the media was actually hardly more than an overflow, into the United States, of the long-standing war between the surviving Russian Nationalist Communist elements in the Soviet Union (formerly led by Josef Stalin) and their bitter enemies in the Jewish-Zionist-Trotskyite movement which was now ensconced on American soil.

All of this, of course, is not to say that McCarthy was not sincere in his motives, but he was very clearly being manipulated by forces that were far beyond his comprehension.

And the fact that his chief “advisor” was the ubiquitous Roy Cohn, who continued to play a major role as a Zionist “fixer” (at the same time doubling as an organized crime lawyer) points precisely toward those forces that were guiding McCarthy toward ultimate destruction.

We also learn more from Jewish writer Stuart Svonkin’s book Jews Against Prejudice: American Jews and the Fight for Civil Liberties which demonstrates that—despite what the Anti-Defamation League and the American Jewish Committee would like to us to believe today— the truth is that both organizations were very much involved in the very type of “McCarthyism” that they today decry. Svonkin noted:

As committed Cold War liberals, staff members of the ADL and AJC cooperated with the FBI, HUAC [the House Un-American Activities Committee], and other agents of the federal loyalty and security program during the late 1940s and 1950s, sharing their files on politically suspect organizations inside and outside the Jewish community.

This policy of cooperation, which built upon the partnership established during the antifascist campaign of the 1930s and early 1940s, was designed to minimize the association of Jews with communism, to protect liberals from persecution, and to ensure that the federal government remained attentive to the activities of right-wing extremists.

While the AJC and ADL hoped to moderate HUAC’s methods, these attempts to reform the anticommunist crusade from within reflected a basic acquiescence to the assumptions and strategies of the domestic cold war and inevitably contributed to the infringement of civil libertarian principles.

In addition, it’s probably worth noting what the well-known “conservative” critic of McCarthyism—Peter Viereck—pointed out in 1954 in regard to McCarthy. His words are rather interesting, when recalled in the modern-day context of how McCarthy and “McCarthyism” are best remembered.Viereck said:

McCarthy basically is not the fascist type but the type of the left-wing anarchist agitator, by an infallible instinct and not “by accident” subverting precisely those institutions that are the most conservative and organic, everything venerable and patrician, from the Constitution, and precisely the most decorated or paternal generals (Marshall, Eisenhower, Taylor, Zwicker), to the leaders of our most deeply established religion and precisely the most ancient of our universities . . . He satisfies the resentments of his followers, because his sincerest hatred is always against the oldest, most rooted, and most deeply educated patrician families—the Cabot Lodges, Achesons, Conants, Adlai Stevenson.

Rather than targeting the big American Zionist families (such as the Rothschild-allied Schiffs, for example) who were known to have financed the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, McCarthy was targeting some of America’s old-line families and their associates in the foreign policy establishment.

And it is probably no coincidence that one of McCarthy’s most prominent targets—former Gen. George C. Marshall—was actually one of the most outspoken American critics (during the Truman administration) of the establishment of the Zionist state of Israel.

What is particularly interesting is that Ann Coulter—one of the current “neo-conservatives” whose ideological sponsors and patrons are modern-day standard bearers of the old-line Trotskyite banner (now posing as “neo-conservatism”)—basically concurs with Viereck’s assessment, saying in her recent book, Treason:

McCarthy’s real “victims” were not sympathetic wit- nesses, frivolous Hollywood screenwriters, or irrelevant blow-hard college professors. They were elite WASP establishment policy-makers . . . They were well-born and looked good in dinner jackets . . . .

In other words, although Viereck was a McCarthy critic and Coulter one of McCarthy’s defenders, both assert (quite correctly) that—contrary to the popular image of McCarthy being a “vicious anti-Semitic hatemonger who was harassing innocent Jewish Hollywood screenwriters”—McCarthy was instead—in the broader sense—effectively taking aim in another direction altogether, thereby muddying the picture of the real sources of subversion in America.

These revelations regarding the McCarthy era are not intended to suggest that there were no disloyal communist traitors within the American system. In truth, in many respects, the late Senator McCarthy did indeed correctly target a large number of communists within the government, the media, and academia. But there was clearly much more to the story of McCarthy than we had ever known before.

Taken together, we see full well that the “Cold War”—as it is generally remembered—was not quite what we generally recall today.The Cold War was the reflection of long-festering behind-the-scenes conflict between Zionist elements in Russia and their Stalinist opponents, a war that ultimately transferred, in many respects, over onto American soil.

The Zionists and the Trotskyites had effectively merged, having found common cause, and began their drive to take over and manipulate—as an Enemy Within—the genuine “anti-communist” movement in America, acting as Judas Goats, leading real patriots to destruction.

By Jeffrey Steinberg 
June 3, 1988 Anno Domini
EIR Feature

A tightly organized cell of suspected Soviet moles wrote the Reagan administra­tion’s “semi-official” long-term strategy for dealing with the U.S.S.R. and also played a major hand in drafting the disastrous Intermediate-Range Nuclear Force (INF) treaty that a deluded President Reagan now hopes will earn him and Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachov the Nobel Peace Prize .

As shocking as this may sound, Dr. Albert Wohlstetter and Dr. Fred Ikle, the two principal authors of the presidential report, Discriminate Deterrence, have been identified to this news service by highly reliable U.S. intelligence sources as prime suspects in a Soviet-Israeli “false flag” spy ring first exposed with the November 1985 arrest of Jonathan Jay Pollard and the December 1987 arrest of Shabtai Kalmanowitch.

On Feb. 19, 1988, Washington Post associate editor Bob Woodward published a front-page story detailing the Pentagon and CIA’s futile search for “Mr. X,” the designation for a high-level intelligence community mole who was believed to be providing Pollard with top secret code numbers of classified military documents that Pollard, a counterterrorist analyst at a Naval Investigative Service facility in Suitland, Md., would then pilfer and pass on to Israeli and Soviet intelligence. Shabtai Kalmanowitch, a Russian-born Israeli multi-millionaire, soon to be tried in Israel as a KGB spy, is widely believed to have been one of the Israel-Soviet “back channels” through which the “Mr. X” loot was shared with Moscow.

According to one Pentagon source, the elusive “Mr. X” is actually known to be an entire cell of shared Soviet-Israeli agents, rather than just one well-placed individual. While Woodward’s headline-grabbing revelations about “Mr. x” were aimed at blocking the Department of Justice from shutting down its Pollard inves­tigation altogether, under reported strong pressure from State Department chief counsel Abraham Sofaer and Secretary of State George Shultz himself, Pentagon and CIA officials have been reportedly aware that they are dealing with an “X Committee”, buried deep inside the American national security establishment.

One version of the “X Committee” list, reportedly passed from the office of the general counsel to the Secretary of Defense and on to the FBI early this year, contained such prominent Reagan administration figures as: Ikle, Richard Perle, Steven Bryen, Douglas Feith, Andy Mar­shall, Henry Rowen, and Frank Gaffney, Jr. All were, up until very recently, senior officials at the Pentagon, the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, and the CIA’s National Intelligence Estimates Board.

For the past month, a team of EIR investigators has con­ducted an extensive background cross-check of these named individuals and others closely associated with them, such as Michael Ledeen, Roy Godson, and Neil Livingstone. This preliminary special report summarizes the findings to date.

Albert Wohlstetter recruits a net
Decades before there was Pollard and Kalmanowitch, Dr. Albert Wohlstetter had already established himself as one of America’s pre-eminent “nuclear strategists”—certainly one of the figures upon whom the early 1960s character “Dr.Strangelove” was based. First at the Rand Corporation and the University of Chicago, and later at his own consulting firm, Pan-Heuristics , Wohlstetter groomed literally scores of proteges for future sensitive government posts.

Using the Senate offices of the late Henry Jackson (D­-Wash.) and Clifford Case (R-N.J.) as stepping stones for placing his epigones into the Washington, D.C. policymak­ing circuit, Wohlstetter had succeeded, by the time the Rea­gan administration entered office, in placing his assets in sensitive and powerful positions at the Pentagon. Dr. Fred Ikle, a Wohlstetter protege from their days together at Rand, became the deputy secretary of defense. Richard Perle, who had come under Wohlstetter’s wing while still a student at Hollywood High School, and who survived a 1970 near­ arrest, reportedly for passing secrets to the Mossad while on Scoop Jackson’s staff, became President Reagan’s most trusted arms control advisor up until his departure from the Pentagon late last year. Perle was the actual author of the disastrous INF treaty proposal jumped on by Soviet boss Gorbachov at Reykjavik. The INF treaty, signed at last De­cember’s Washington summit, has done more in the short term to hasten the decoupling of Western Europe from the United States than any action ever taken by the Russians.

According to one former associate, Wohlstetter carefully avoided ever accepting a formal government post that would have cast him in the spotlight and subjected him to more rigorous security checks. Rather, he cut the seemingly con­tradictory figure of a big spender, purchasing lavish mansions in Los Angeles and Chicago, and hosting dinners with $200 bottles of wine at the most expensive restaurants for prospec­tive proteges.

All the while, Wohlstetter apparently went to great lengths to distance himself from his years of activity as a figure in the American communist movement in the 1930s and 1940s. According to several Wohlstetter contemporaries inter­viewed by EIR, while at City College, Wohlstetter was ac­tively linked to the Communist Left Opposition. That oppo­sition sprang up around the figure of Leon Trotsky following Trotsky’s ouster by Stalin, at the point that Stalin moved to decimate the “Trust” apparatus of “cosmopolitan commu­nists” whom he believed were too anxious to cut a deal with Western financier interests.

By 1983, Wohlstetter and his network had so penetrated the national security apparatus of the Reagan administration that the “father of America’s MAD strategy,” as Wohlstetter was known, was formally appointed—at the same time as Henry Kissinger—to the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, a post he retains today. While not exactly an operational assignment, membership on PFIAB entitles Wohlstetter to access some of America’s most important and operational intelligence secrets.

When the Reagan administration set out to define a long­-term strategy for confronting the Soviet threat going into the early decades of the 21st century, a “private” blue ribbon commission was empaneled by Defense Secretary Casper Weinberger. The co-chairmen of the panel were Wohlstetter and lkle.

The final product of the Wohlstetter-Ikle Commission, once one grasps the implications of the “X Committee” authorship, was predictable. Released at a Pentagon press con­ference on Jan. 12 of this year, Discriminate Deterrence, a Report from the Commission on Integrated Long-Term Strat­egy, made two particular policy pronouncements that were tantamount to treason.

First, the report stated categorically that the United States should formally remove its nuclear umbrella from its Euro­pean NATO allies, thus virtually assuring the Soviets of an unchallenged conventional military takeover of Western Eu­rope at any moment they might choose.

Second, the report called for the abandonment of the President’s Strategic Defense Initiative by refocusing on the more narrow objective of a point defense of America’ s land­ based nuclear arsenal. By abandoning the overall doctrinal shift to Mutually Assured Survival based on a broad defense against all Soviet nuclear weapons, the report called for kill­ing the whole program while at the same time abandoning the postwar doctrine of deterrence by massive retaliation.

As if to remove any doubt as to the intention of the report, co-author Wohlstetter told an EIR journalist at the Pentagon press briefing, ”The SOl will eventually die of embarrass­ment [because] the notion that the Soviet Union would launch a nuclear attack against the population of the United States is absurd.” Emphasizing that Soviet expansionist goals were “narrowly” focused on the Eurasian landmass, Wohlstetter went to the very heart of the Discriminate Deterrence policy by asking EIR, “Why should the U.S. risk self-annihilation for the sake of defending foreign soil?”