By Communitarian.ru
September 6, 2015 Anno Domini
Translated from the Russian

Operation Krymnash: Putin “brings the arrival of Mashiach closer”?

Why “Krymnash” (Crimea is Ours), and Donbass – “Nenash”? The head of the Eda Haredit sect, the vice-chairman of the Rabbinical court, Rabbi Moshe Sternbach, assures that in Crimea, Putin “brings the arrival of the mashiach closer.”

In March 2014, Sternbach reported that “the Vilna Gaon himself” before his death revealed to his disciples the correct signs of the approaching end of the world: “When you hear that the Russians have captured a city in Crimea, you should know that the times of the Messiah have begun, and you can already hear his steps. And when you hear that you have reached Constantinople (today’s Istanbul), you should put on your Sabbath clothes and not take them off, as this will mean that the mashiach can come at any moment. ”

Passing these words, a rabbi from among the Breslau Hasidim, himself a descendant of the “Vilna genius”, said:

“We must thank President Putin for bringing closer the arrival of the Mashiach” (the Jewish “messiah”, in the Orthodox sense – the Antichrist).

“Sternbach’s Prophecy” is based on the interpretation of the book of the prophet Ezekiel about the “war of Gog and Magog” – two peoples, whose invasion will shake the world shortly before the end of the world. In the book of Ezekiel, Gog is called “nasi rosh”, which some translate as “prince of Rosha.” Which is to appear “in the last days … like a storm … from the borders of the north.” According to Sternbach’s version, Putin fits the interpretation of the concept of “Prince Roche”. In addition, according to the “calculations” of Joseph ben Mataffy (“Flavia”), the land of Magog is the Scythian Crimea.

Thus, “both components of the near end of the world are present.”

The American Jewish newspaper Forward, which reported in 2014 about the eschatological sentiments that gripped some Jews, recalled that if the Vilna Gaon linked the arrival of the Mashiach with the capture of Crimea by Russia, then this event, in fact, happened during his lifetime , in 1783, when the Russian Empire conquered Crimea during the Russian-Turkish war. And if then the “mashiach” did not appear, then it is still too early to put on Saturday clothes – especially considering that Erdogan is not yet waiting for Russian troops near Istanbul, “Forwards columnist Sigal Samuel believed then.

Later, on August 21, 2015, during a meeting with V. Putin, the leader of the reformist Jews “Ner TAMID” in Crimea, Anatoly Gendin, thanked the Russian president for the attentiveness of the Russian authorities to the demands of Crimean Jews for restitution:

“After several years of fruitless appeals in Ukraine, in this year we have resolved the issue of returning the Talmud-Torah to us—a former religious school for boys in Simferopol. “

Gendin added that the framework agreement on restitution also implies the return of the former synagogue building in Yevpatoria. In addition, some ritual temples of the “religion of the bachelor” will be created at the suggestion of Putin.

We remind you that immediately after the annexation of Crimea, the then head of the “reformist Jews” Mikhail Kapustin wrote a petition to U.S. President Barack Obama with an appeal to send American troops to the Russian peninsula. However, according to today’s statements of “reformist” and “ordinary” rabbis, today they feel safer under the sovereignty of Russia under Putin, who, according to the same Forward, harshly suppresses “manifestations of anti-Semitism” and is attentive to the demands of Jews.

It is extremely difficult to imagine that the current president “will send troops to liberate Jerusalem.” In any case, today the opposite phenomenon is observed—40,000 Jews from Israel are asking Putin to grant Russian citizenship in order to move to Crimea.

In general, there is no doubt what decision will be made by the ruling regime, since there is no doubt about the predilections of Putin himself, who, after being brought up in a “Jewish communal apartment,” never got rid of the “Mowgli syndrome” – when “the meaning of life becomes constant calculation their own benefit and outplaying the goyim. ”

In general, it is necessary to take a sober attitude to the “prophecies of the Vilna Gaons” and other Jewish sects, ready to adjust the “prophecies” to any events (“a true leading figure of the Talmud must find 49 arguments for and 49 arguments against” [1]).

Meanwhile, one cannot but compare the shameful political decisions of Putin, for whom “Krymnash”, and Donbass – at the beginning of April 2014, was also “ours”, and a few days later it became “not ours.” Which indicates, under whose “spiritual” control the “highest official of Russia” is.

As for the “end of the world”, the liberation of Sevastopol and Crimea is followed not only by Constantinople, but also—in accordance with the prophecy of Ezekiel—”the entry of Gog into Jerusalem”, the war, the defeat of Gog (in fact, the fanatics from among the Jews Satanists and drive all political events).

However, according to Revelation, then the accession and fall of the Antichrist will follow. And the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

NOTE:

[1] “According to the Talmud itself (Yalkut Shadakh), the Book of the Law was given without vowels precisely so that each of its words could be interpreted in seventy different ways … in the treatises Erubin and Sanhedrin one of the leading figures of Talmudism is praised for that he could always find in the Law 49 reasons or grounds for permission and for prohibition of the same subject, for condemnation and justification for violation of any command, A.S. Shmakov, “International Secret Government”, Talmud

“Trump’s shift on the Golan indirectly validated Russia’s seizure of Crimea.”

By Yaroslav Trofimov
Sept. 19, 2020 Anno Domini
Wall Street Journal

When the founders of the U.N. gatheredered in San Francisco after the Nazis’ defeat in 1945, they made a bold decision: to outlaw territorial conquest, the method by which many of the world’s borders had been shaped. The new U.N. Charter barred members of the world body “from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.”

For decades afterward, the inviolability of existing international borders—regardless of how well they matched a region’s ethnic makeup or served historical justice—was one of the most widely invoked principles of global affairs. The broad U.S.-led coalition to restore the independence of Kuwait—annexed in 1990 by Saddam Hussein’s Iraq as its wayward 19th province—stood as a testament to the endurance of that postwar proposition.

But today, in a newly unmoored international order in which the strong increasingly exercise raw power over the weak, old territorial grievances are bubbling up to the surface again. This new willingness to try to alter borders by force is arising just as the U.S., which for decades guaranteed the stability of the international system, is pulling back from its global commitments and the institutions that it helped to forge in the wake of World War II. In many major capitals, an irredentist ambition to grab the territory of neighbors is driving policy once again.

“Our habit that borders remain fixed is the product of a very recent past, of the second half of the 20th century and the Cold War. If you look at European history, there has not been a single century when borders didn’t shift in a radical way,” said Fyodor Lukyanov, chairman of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, a Moscow think tank that advises the Russian government.

“A principle of international relations is not some commandment from Moses. It’s the product of a balance of power and interests,” he added. “When someone is able to ensure that those rules and principles are observed, they are observed. When this ability ends, they are no longer observed.”

Countries have invaded each other since the dawn of history, but irredentism—a belief that historic parts of one’s country under supposedly unjust foreign rule must be reunited with the homeland—is a much more recent invention. The term was coined in 1877 by the Italian politician Matteo Renato Imbriani. Speaking at his father’s funeral, he pledged not to rest until all of Italy’s “terre irredente”— “unredeemed lands” then under the Austro-Hungarian crown—were liberated.

Irredentism quickly grew into a potent political force, legitimizing demands for territorial conquest and helping to
spark both world wars. The most consequential irredentist movement, of course, arose in Germany, where Hitler promised to reunite the German Volk, newly divided by supposedly unfair post-World War I frontiers, into a rejuvenated Third Reich.

The horrors unleashed by the resulting war triggered a profound reset of international norms—and a hard-won belief that insisting on fixed, inviolable borders would help to ward off future aggression and conflict. African states that became independent in the 1960s and 1970s universally agreed not to challenge their frontiers, many of which were arbitrarily drawn by colonial powers. In 1970, West Germany accepted the loss of what is now western Poland. Argentina’s irredentist invasion of the Falkland Islands in 1982 ended in a military rout and the downfall of its military dictatorship. While the breakups of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia in the early 1990s caused several civil wars and created a half-dozen separatist enclaves, the existing administrative borders of the component Soviet and Yugoslav republics remained as the internationally recognized frontiers of newly independent states such as Georgia and Bosnia-Herzegovina.

Then came Russia’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula in 2014—the first irredentist change of borders in Europe since World War II. This major breach of established global rules met with only halfhearted international repercussions, such as mild sanctions by the U.S. and the European Union. Russian President Vladimir Putin’s territorial grab was followed later that year by a semi-covert invasion of Russian forces into Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region.

“We have chipped away at the foundations of international law by doing nothing, or doing very little, in response,” said Toomas Hendrik Ilves, who served as president of Estonia in 2006-16. “It is a very dangerous trend, especially for small countries like mine. If you are a small country, what do you really have except international law and its prohibitions on aggression and changing borders through force?”

Mr. Putin, who sees himself as the “gatherer of Russian lands” unfairly lost during the Soviet Union’s collapse, has repeatedly called Ukraine an unredeemed part of the historic Russian homeland. He holds the same view of Belarus, now undergoing an unprecedented democratic upheaval. “I believe that the Belarusians, the Russians and the Ukrainians are one people,” he said last year.

Russia’s brazenness in Crimea went a long way to embolden China’s communist leaders. Much like Mr. Putin, President Xi Jinping is focused on restoring his country’s erstwhile glory. He has already erased much of the distinctiveness of Hong Kong, a former British colony, and is becoming more vocal about absorbing Taiwan, a former Japanese possession that has never been ruled by the Chinese Communist Party. 

“Crimea certainly had an impact on China because it showed that the West was powerless to stop a territorial grab,” said Minxin Pei of Claremont McKenna College. “Eastern Ukraine also gave China some ideas that you could run a ‘hybrid warfare,’ making the life of Ukraine—or Taiwan—very miserable without crossing the line of a real war.”

Beijing is also making irredentist claims over swaths of north India, where Chinese troops engaged in a deadly clash with Indian forces in June, and the South China Sea, where China has erected outposts in areas claimed by the Philippines, Vietnam and others. This year, Kazakhstan and Tajikistan’s foreign ministries protested after official Chinese publications described large parts of their countries as historic Chinese territories that should return to the motherland.

“China is certainly a very revisionist power,” said retired Rear Adm. Sudarshan Shrikhande, a former chief of India’s naval intelligence. “It’s quite astounding how China seems to be wanting to simultaneously rub so many countries the wrong way.”

Smaller powers are showing irredentist leanings too. Over the past three years, the Turkish military has occupied some parts of Syria and Iraq that President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has said should have remained in Turkey after the breakup of the Ottoman Empire a century ago. In recent weeks, Turkey also came close to a military confrontation with Greece over Ankara’s expansive new claims over the Eastern Mediterranean, a crisis that has prompted some senior Turkish officials to question Greece’s sovereignty over Greek islands close to the Anatolian mainland such as Rhodes. “Our civilization is one of conquest,” Mr. Erdogan thundered in August.

Meanwhile, Hungary’s nationalist leader, Viktor Orban, regularly decries the 1920 Trianon treaty that left large ethnic Hungarian minorities outside of Hungary’s borders. Since 2017, he has blocked Ukraine’s formal co-operation with NATO over the status of Ukraine’s ethnic Hungarian minority.

Even the U.S. is no longer universally committed to the principle of the inviolability of international borders. Last year, President Donald Trump recognized Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights, which Israel took from Syria in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. Israel had been prepared to return the land to Syria for peace as recently as the mid-2000s. The Kremlin happily noted that Mr. Trump’s shift on the Golan indirectly validated Russia’s seizure of Crimea.

The need to counter this drift toward greater acceptance of territorial conquest is becoming increasingly urgent, warned Daniela Schwarzer, director of the German Council on Foreign Relations. “It’s a very grim picture that is emerging,” she said. Unless the trend can be reversed, she added, “the gate will be open for chaos in many regions of the world.”

Putin’s defeat
By Andrei Piontkovsky
Translated from Russian

– This is an outline of the entire Russian political leadership, which accumulates its treasures in the United States.

The U.S. Financial Intelligence Agency is instructed to identify all assets belonging to the top of the Russian ruling class, beginning with Vladimir Putin, and to publish these data within 180 days (most likely, this has already been known to it). After that, all who should be followed will be subject to the laws in force in the United States to combat the laundering of criminally acquired capital. This is a fundamentally new character of US relations with Putin’s kleptocratic regime.

Putin was not going to put up with this. He sent Khodorkovsky to prison. Gusinsky and Berezovsky went into exile. However, for several years they continued to fund their new media, and even when some of these sites fell into their hands, they maintained their opposition views.

It was also the only site where former print journalists worked, mainly from the Kommersant newspaper, one of the most professional daily newspapers in post-Soviet Russia. Over the years, in Russia, as in other countries, more and more journalists who have lost their jobs in cutting print media have gone online. But online publications did not have the resources to pay for investigative reporting and reporting. Therefore, journalists increasingly became observers.

Why haven’t these laws been applied before, the thoughtful reader will ask? Because for the time being, while the deeds of the Russian elite were limited to plundering their own country, this situation suited the West, which was never distinguished by its crystal integrity. If you call a spade a spade, the West was an accomplice-beneficiary of these deals. But people from St. Petersburg’s gateways, drunk with crazy money, wanted, as a Pushkin old woman, also “geopolitical greatness” for themselves and their dynasties. And they demanded from the American goldfish not only the status of the richest people in the West, but also a new “Yalta deal”, recognizing them as rulers of half the world and securing entire nations and states in their possession.

From a former chess champion who funded Kasparov. During the short-term political spring under President Dmitry Medvedev, the Russian intelligentsia took heart and the online media became more ambitious. But problematic investigative units were raffled off. Thus, bloggers began to play a leading role in exposing corruption. This is a new trend encouraging him to cover in the media.

We will not share your email with anyone. To a large extent, it was decided that Russian online media cannot publish investigation reports on their own, and someone will have to break stories outside the country. The crisis in Ukraine led to hunger. The Russian invasion of Crimea was widely covered by online media, and the Kremlin’s intention to create its own merciless narrative of the events there decided that it could no longer tolerate foul language.

The methodical injection of more than a trillion dollars exported from Russia into the Western economy (a recent estimate by the authoritative National Bureau of Economic Research of the United States) was innocently combined with these entities with a passionate desire to spoil the same West, and especially the United States, wherever possible. I quote from the text of the law a list of objects of keen interest for US financial intelligence: “The largest political figures and oligarchs close to power in the Russian Federation, their condition, proximity to Putin and other members of the“ ruling elite ”, participation in corruption, sources of income and assets of their members families, relations with foreign business. ”

Since yesterday, not only freedom of information, but also freedom of discussion has been limited in Russia. World War II – others call it the “war on terror” – views humanity as a “savior”: Russian Vladimir Putin and his Putinism. Some argue that only he can save world peace.

However, the following shows that this person is affected by very dangerous ideas: he is a Jew who was educated and anchored in Mensol Talmudism. In particular, his rabbi is the Lubavitcher Chabad, whose goal is to influence the coming of the Messiah of Judaism, Ben David, during the course of the World War. To do this, he affects Putin. In addition, Judaists emphasize that communism is Judaism – and vice versa. Hence his inability to kill his critics.

Here is not only a threat to the assets of “Putin’s friends”, it is the collapse of their entire lifestyle, beyond which they and their offspring no longer think of their existence. This is modern Western medicine, which promises not only political, but also biological, if you want, immortality, this is education of children and grandchildren, real estate in the best resorts in the world, and a lot of anything that makes up a modest charm of belonging to the upper class of the world bourgeoisie. And in all this they will now be denied. Visa restrictions are introduced based on proximity to Putin. A personal war has been declared on hundreds of the largest thieves of the Russian Federation and part-time of its leaders.

Another Rasputin Putin is Alexander Dugin, who, like the very influential Igor Panarin Putin, his government and Russians sat in satanic Eurasianism: Restoring the Romanov Empire, including Dugin, says this is Russia’s order, doomsday blows. Death is the beginning of life, this atheist says!

But, first of all, Putin is the masons of the royal arch and is Grand Master. According to a classmate, he was chosen as the Antichrist of the Illuminati. Three nationalist philosophers of the century also greatly influence Putin and ordered his governors to read their works: Nikolai Berdyaev, Vladimir Solovyov and Ivan Ilyin. “The Russian messianic idea,” Berdyaev wrote, “always emphasized Russia as a country that would help solve the problems of mankind.” Putin considers himself “this Messiah.”

In any case, the former post-communist Russia with its godfathers set up – to steal here, and dynastically and hedonistically enjoy the highest standards of consumption in the West – will no longer be. This form of kleptocratic being required the active and far from disinterested cooperation of the Western elites. Both the Russian state and its relations with the West will now be organized somehow differently. Maybe a lot worse, but in a different way.

Nationalism is the religion of Russians, who are mostly atheists. This religion of nationalism is sponsored by the Orthodox Russian Church, whose priests are mostly crypto-Jews. To what extent has all this Pharisee-Illuminati-Masonic national fascism influenced Putin in his role in the end of the world?

Former adviser to Vladimir Putin warns nations that Putin has been in the past 10 years. Therefore, Putin puffs himself up, makes himself stronger than him, and believes that the West will pace out of fear of his strong will. He was raised by a fanatical Jewish Talmudist. Interview with Daryl Bradford Smith with a well-informed Russian – after 00 min. Brand: Putin is a Jew, and the name of his mother, Shalomov, in Putin’s autobiography is a Jewish name that was later changed to Shelomov.

He graduated from the Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics of Moscow State University. MV Lomonosov in 1962. Leading researcher at the Institute for System Analysis of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Author of over 100 articles and several monographs on control theory, global moderation, nuclear strategy.

A family

Father – Andrei Andreevich Piontkovsky (died in 1973), professor-lawyer, corresponding member of the USSR Academy of Sciences, member of the Supreme Court of the USSR. Mother – Tatyana Nazarovna, was born in the Shadrinsky district of the Kurgan region.

She switched to Russian – like many crypto-Jewish priests. In fact, Putin is intertwined with the Jewish doomsday sect, whose goal is to advance the coming of the Jewish Messiah to Rebbe Schneerson, like Ben David at the height of the great war – a political genius to make Israel the ruler of the world to do.

Putin wears a scarab on a tie and shows many signs of a Masonic hand. Playdes Library: The Scarab symbolizes the power of the body, the resurrection of the soul, the eternal and incomprehensible creator of Ra in His aspect as the Lord of the Sun. He was a symbol of Egyptian soldiers and is widely used in Freemasonry.

Education

He graduated from the Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics of Moscow State University. MV Lomonosov in 1962. Candidate of physico-mathematical sciences.

Scientific activity

Leading researcher at the Institute for System Analysis Author of over 100 articles and several monographs on control theory, global moderation, nuclear strategy. In the 1970s, he studied computer models of the world, which in the West were developed as part of the Club of Rome. Member of the American Mathematical Society.

Although Putin’s confidant said that Putin-he did not. So, he and Russia are under the control of Rothschild. It is alleged that Putin has no choice but to. Messianic nationalism Putin is deeply nationalist-religious – influenced by three philosophers of the century: the Kremlin recently appropriated to the governors of three philosophical books, either Nikolai Berdyaev, Vladimir Solovyov and Ivan Ilyin. They foresaw the greatness of Russia under the autocrat. Russia will surpass secularism and atheism and create a single spiritual empire. “The Russian messianic idea,” Berdyaev wrote, “always emphasized Russia as a country that would help solve the problems of mankind.”

Political activity

Since 1998 he has been engaged in political journalism, has published several hundred articles in Russian and foreign media. Winner of the Golden Gong 2001 Award in International Journalism. Published on the site “Grani.ru”. Member of the International Pen Club.

In 2004 he joined the Russian United Democratic Party Yabloko (after the defeat of the party in the Duma elections), a member of its federal council. It is in radical opposition to the political regime of Vladimir Putin.

Putin considers himself “this savior.” This paranoia was further developed by the Kremlin Insider: Igor Panarin’s vision that the Russian Empire would reappear, led by Putin. In recent months, the deception of Duginist ideas by the Putin regime has become increasingly apparent. But now, with the release by James Hazer of “The Liberation of the American Empire Must Be Destroyed: Alexander Dugin and the Danger of Root Harsh Days,” we finally have a complete book on this subject.

In order to be united “from Lisbon to Vladivostok”, this Eurasian Union needs a definition of its ideology, and for this Dugin developed a new “Political Theory”, which combines all the strengths of communism, National Socialism, ecologism and traditionalism.

Member of the Initiative Group for the nomination of Vladimir Bukovsky as a presidential candidate in the 2008 elections.

On September 25, 2007, the Basmanny Court of Moscow began to consider the case on recognition of the book “Unloved Country” as extremist. An expert from the prosecutor’s office found calls for violence and derogatory remarks against individuals of “Jewish, American, Russian and other nationalities” in the phrases “inciting racial and ethnic hatred” and “shameful goats.”

From traditionalism, he receives an excuse for ending free thought. Everything else is straight from National Socialism. “What Russia needs,” says Dugin, “is true, true, radical revolutionary and consistent fascist fascism.”

A person who believes that the “meaning of Russia” is the “end of the world” is a person whose geopolitical doctrine is implemented by the ruler of Russia. In short, Dugin and Putin’s Eurasianism are a satanic cult. And Dugin believes that Ukraine is a condition for Eurasia.

Russian people: in Russia you have to deal with a great European nation, a people of aggressive, hierarchical, revanchist extras, educated for military cults and military exploits, the modern world system does not recognize and stoic stubbornness in sees deprivations and difficulties as part of life. Russians are anti-liberal, absolutely not democrats, never inferior and deeply rooted in Russian history.

 ByTimothy Fitzpatrick
March 9, 2014 Anno Domini

Is Russian state-sponsored mouthpiece Russia Today the legitimate source of alternative news the world has been waiting for in the wake up repeated failures?

Those awake to the lies of the Zionist, corporate-controlled media are also awake to the lies, no less malevolent, of the controlled opposition alternative media. At times, Russia Today (RT) appears to be legitimate, but other times, it doesn’t. It exposes conspiracy, the Western media, Zionist geopolitics, and corporate fascism, but then it lobbies for cultural Marxist “progression”, particularly in the forms of LGBT-feminist rights as well as UN Agenda 21, global warming propaganda. So, what is the story? Is it the real deal?

The alleged NATO-Zionist-backed coup d’état in Ukraine has provoked the Russian network against Zionist-controlled Western media outlets, such as CNN, Fox News, and the British Press, even causing dissent within the network’s own ranks.

As expected, Russia Today has told some truth about America’s press: that it is part of the Zionist-controlled West’s geopolitical strategy. However, it seems Russia Today is not telling the truth for truth’s sake but for the Kremlin’s own self interests.

Newscasts full of cultural Marxist propaganda
One could argue that Russia Today’s consistent favourable coverage of gay rights through the network’s international English-speaking bureau has been a strategy to neutralize the West’s propaganda that Russia persecutes homosexuals. This has been especially noticeable in the lead up to the Sochi winter Olympics. But a handful of anchors on the network have been promoting their cultural Marxist rhetoric for a long time. Abby Martin (Breaking the Set) and Thom Hartmann (The Big Picture) are two of the biggest radical leftists on the network. These two clowns and their propaganda appear to completely contradict the supposed nationalist intent of the channel.
Afterall, Russia’s own Orthodox patriarch has warned that feminism could destroy Russia. One wonders what kind of hiring policy is in place, especially considering the recent resignation of RT correspondent Liz Wahl, who resigned on air in protest of RT’s coverage of the alleged Ukraine coup. She resigned at the height of the Ukraine crisis and RT carrying out daily reports about how the Western media allegedly is lying. Abby Martin has spoken out in support of the Wahl.

Peter Lavelle (Crosstalk) and Tim Kirby are tolerable, sometimes even insightful, but it doesn’t help RT’s credibility when they go out and hire shills like former CNN talk-show host Larry King (Politicking). And although Max Keiser seems to speak out against the Jewish usurist establishment, remember that he is part of the controlled opposition network headed by Zionist Alex Jones.
Keiser’s on-air personality on The Keiser Report is annoying and excessive. He is trying to be loud-mouthed and ironic in a way similar to Jones, but it just doesn’t work for Keiser.

If RT is to save face, it needs to immediately fire Martin and Hartmann, and forget about trying to legitimize itself with King. Get rid of King too. It also needs to quit placating the West with its LGBT rights nonsense.

Is RT’s divided house an indication of Russia’s intentions?
Perhaps everything is going as planned for RT in the way of editorial policies, except for the minor hiccup of Wahl. Perhaps Russia doesn’t really care for social conservatism but merely uses it as a pretext for furthering its geopolitical strategy. This would explain why Martin and Hartmann haven’t been fired. But then again, maybe this is all a façade for Western consumption. Perhaps RT’s Russian bureau tells a different, more united story…without the cultural Marxism. Either way, RT’s English-speaking bureau is sending mixed signals.