By Josh

Here is a new set of information, looking at Tsar Nicholas II with a different perspective. In this research you will notice that Nicholas II was making a lot of questioning decisions which just can’t all be blamed on his ‘incompetence’ or ‘ignorance’.

A lot of the actions taken by Nicholas II were key in making the Bolshevik Revolution happen.

One great example would be him approving of the October Manifesto which led to Freemasonry flourishing in Russia as well as giving Communist Jews political representation in the newly created parliament. His close ties with both Witte and Rasputin is also highly questionable.

Witte has long been proven to be a very corrupt individual who had friendly ties with the same Jewish bankers that wished to see the downfall of Tsarist Russia. Witte was responsible for putting Russia into massive debt to Jewish bankers, yet, Nicholas II thought it was a great idea to allow him to retain his position of Minister of Finance and would later make the first Prime Minister of Russia?

For more in-depth research into the traitor Sergei Witte, check this out.

Another thing that Nicholas II did was to personally intervene to save Jewish communist terrorists from being executed.

“In May 1903, Gershuni was arrested in Kiev. In February 1904, Gershuni was tried by a military court in Saint Petersburg and received a death sentence, which later was reduced to life imprisonment at a hard labour camp by Tsar Nicholas II of Russia.[5] In 1906, he hid in a barrel of sauerkraut and escaped from the Akatuy katorga to China”

para 4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grigory_Gershuni

Gershuni was a terrorist leader of the highly dangerous SR Combat Organization. Gershuni was responsible for the murder of multiple of Nicholas II’s political officials. He made it clear that he wanted to use terrorism to take down Tsarist Russia. Now…why would Nicholas II personally intervene to save him from execution?

Only for him to soon after conveniently escape?

That’s another point: There are too many examples of prominent Jewish communists who get caught, get sentenced to ‘hard labor’ and soon after, they all easily escape.

Stalin himself escaped up to 5 times! How is that even possible? How is he able to escape even once and how was he not executed the second time they caught him?

All of this was happening under Nicholas II’s watch.

More examples:

“On 11 March, Spiridonova was tried and convicted of Luzhenovsky’s murder and sentenced to death. However, the tribunal also asked that the sentence be commuted to penal servitude in Siberia, in view of her ill health. This was approved on 20 March.[10] The liberal press continued its campaign in her support. On 2 April, Avramov was himself assassinated, creating a further sensation.”

para 11 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Spiridonova#Luzhenovsky_assassination

“One morning, a prison guard told Izmailovich that she would be hanged within five days. Although she was not concerned about the death sentence, her sisters hired her a defense lawyer for her court martial. When the lawyer brought her the indictment, she was shocked to discover it named an innocent baker’s assistant as the bomb thrower.[24] Her lawyer advised her to call witnesses of the 18 October events, who could testify about the massacre of peaceful protestors ordered by Kurlov. She compiled a list, but the court refused to permit her any witnesses in her defense. After saying goodbye to her comrade in the room above her, and expressing her love for him, she prepared herself for her death.[25] He told her not to imagine herself to be a second Sophia Perovskaya, as he believed her sentence would be commuted.

After a few minutes of deliberation, the judges found Izmailovich and Pulikhov guilty of the charges of conspiracy to murder and sentenced them to execution by hanging. But following appeals by her sisters, the sentence was commuted to a life sentence of penal labour

paras 11, 13 & 2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandra_Izmailovich#Trial

Here’s another Jewish terrorist who was sentenced to death but had her sentence commuted – escaped Siberia TWICE

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariya_Shkolnik

“Sukloff was part of the shesterka, a group of six SR women who were sentenced to Siberia together following attempted murders in 1905–06. All were first sentenced to death and then had their punishment commuted. The shesterka included Sukloff, Spiridonova, Revekka Moiseevna Fialka, Lidiya Pavlovna”

page 200, footnote 91

https://www.proquest.com/openview/c88bafc608b03a54f81dd88743a6c0b3/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

“Spiridonova was sent to Siberia in the company of five other prominent female SR terrorists. The group was sometimes called the Shesterka (“Six”). As a result of the press campaign, Spiridonova was the most famous. She was also young, attractive, and an ethnic Russian (at least four of the others were Jewish, Belarusian, and Ukrainian)”

para 14 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Spiridonova#Exile_to_Siberia

At least two of the six were Jewish, Shkolnik (Sukloff) and Fialka – All of them had their sentenced commuted.

And being that we are talking about SR Combat Organization. It was run by the Jew Yevno Azef, who was the chief of this terrorist group from 1904 to 1908. But he was also an agent of the Tsarist secret police, and he was still an agent throughout all the years he was the leader of the terrorist group. It took a whole 4 years before Azef had to flee. And there we go again, one big Jewish terrorist being allowed to escape justice and manage to flee.

Again, all of this was going on under the watch of Tsar Nicholas II.. and instead of doing something about it.. he continued to add fuel to the fire..

So it makes me wonder…

Was he ever an enemy of the Jews? We know that the Romonovs were big into Freemasonry, at least from the 1700s with (Jew) Peter the Great, and from there, Freemasonry continued to spread its toxic influence all over Russia.

“He (Peter the Great) had a Jewish ancestor, through his mother’s line, a Karaite Jew named Naryshko.”

para 2 harryfreedman.substack.com/p/peter-the-greats-jews

Then we see that Nicholas II was responsible for allowing Freemasonry to become prominent in Russia once again, but this time it was done at a very fast pace. And we know that the lodges that were established as a result of the October Manifesto were responsible for the February Revolution, which paved the way for the Bolshevik Revolution.

With the Duma being established thanks to Tsar Nicholas II and Witte, it was filled with revolutionaries (Jews) who wanted to implement communist reforms in Russia and called for amnesty for political prisoners. It was being used as a political instrument against Tsarist rule. So Nicholas II decided to abolish it. Smart move right?

Only for him to re-establish the Duma again.

There were a total of four dumas; two were abolished, the other two were changed. And each time it was because it was used as a political weapon against the Tsarist government. It was quite clear from the first Duma what its intention was.. so why in the world did Nicholas II think it was a great idea to keep it around? Why abolish it only to put it back again?

Duma became completely filled with Freemasons and Jewish communists, and it was then used to abolish Tsardom. It accomplished what the first Duma had intended to accomplish.. It was made possible because of Nicholas II’s refusal to abolish the Duma permanently.

It’s almost as if the Tsar is collaborating with his supposed enemies to bring down Tsarist Russia itself. Similar to what Assad did.

A prominent Jewish connection to Nicolas II are the immensely powerful Gunzburg family (“The Russian Rothschilds”).

http://www.tabletmag.com/sections/arts-letters/articles/gunzburgs-halban-russian-rothschilds

They were in direct contact with Tsar Nicholas II’s court & government in a formal capacity

“Thus, we have before us one of the most famous Jewish families in Russia at that time – the family of Baron Gintsburg [Günzburg]. The members of this family not only possessed, as contemporaries believed, “fabulous wealth,” but were, as they are now written in the Russian press, “cult” figures for the vast majority of the Jews of the Russian Empire. Indeed, they had enormous financial wealth & connections with the tsar’s court & international banking capital.

Baron Ginzburg, who built a synagogue in St. Petersburg, ONCE RODE IN A CARRIAGE WITH NICHOLAS II.”

paras 17-18 amhazikaron.org/en/jewish-barons/

Here is Jewish Baron Horace Ginzburg with the hidden hand.

Information on Rasputin:

”Yusupov saw “distinctly Jewish-type” men at Rasputin’s in Petrograd, hence he suspected him of nefarious activities. Father Shavelsky complained to the tsar that Rasputin went out drinking with “Jews and all sorts of dark personalities.” The police recorded a Jewish merchant from Minsk visiting Rasputin in Pokrovskoe and had the man thoroughly investigated. Socializing with Jews was something upper-class Russians typically did not do. It signified bad taste, or something worse.

”From the ugly prejudice of his earlier years, Rasputin grew to accept Jews, as friends and business colleagues, and even to champion liberalized state policies toward Russia’s Jews that put him well ahead of the vast majority of his countrymen. Part of the reason for this was the fact that Russian nationalists had themselves turned away from Rasputin, but just as important was Rasputin’s own personality, his relaxed tolerance toward other nationalities and faiths and his general live-and-let-live nature. The artist Alexander Raevsky recalled during one of his sessions with Rasputin in 1912 how someone in his studio began to curse the Jews. In a flash, Rasputin cut the person off: “That’s not true!” he yelled. “All people are equal before God … Once I traveled from Jerusalem with a Jew. He was a kind man, a pious man. Just as among Christians, so too among them, one finds all kinds of people.”

‘Best remembered of the Jews close to Rasputin was his secretary Aaron Simanovich.”

”He also opened a number of gambling parlors, being himself an inveterate gambler, known to win, and lose, big on high-stakes games at the tables. Reports as to his character diverge wildly. One Okhrana report described him as “quite a nasty man, a powerful string-puller with an insinuating manner, capable of any adventure or speculation.””

”At the time of Rasputin’s murder Simanovich said the two men had met, by coincidence, in 1900 at the railway station in Kazan, and then renewed their acquaintance and began to grow close around 1911.6 Could Simanovich’s gambling addiction have played a role? The Petersburg press reported in 1914 that when the “Capital Arts and Social Club,” the anodyne name behind which one of the city’s larger gambling establishments operated, was on the verge of bankruptcy, Rasputin stepped in to arrange a large loan to keep it afloat. The club, according to the article, was notorious for all sorts of vice and illegality, but this never seemed to bother Rasputin, and although he did not play the tables himself, he liked to come and watch the action”’

• Rasputin: Faith, Power, and the Twilight of the Romanovs
  Book by Douglas Smith

Check this quote out from the same source as above:

”Simanovich purportedly witnessed Rasputin’s respect for Jews at Gorokhovaya. “If among the petitioners were some generals,” Simanovich recalled, “then he would jokingly say to them: ‘Dear Generals, you are used to always being received first. But there are Jews here, people without any rights, and I should see to them first. Jews, let us talk. I want to do everything for you.’”

The Tsar was fully aware of Rasputin’s close ties to Jews, despite this, he still decided to keep him around in his inner circle. Again, how many times can his blunders be blamed on incompetence…

“That this letter demonstrated Rasputin’s prophetic abilities was reinforced for the Imperial Family when the Empress and her daughters went to work in the military hospital set up in the Catherine Palace and saw the horrors of the Great War for themselves. The hospital, and other charities run by the Empress, were funded by Dmitri Rubenstein, a wealthy Jewish banker and friend of Rasputin’s. This connection, and Rasputin’s increasingly public philosemitism, helped to stir up anti-Rasputin sentiment on the extreme-Right, to join that on the extreme-Left.”

para 12 https://kyleorton.co.uk/2021/12/13/rasputin-and-the-empress/

Rasputin had possible ties to the German Foreign Ministry through Dmitri Rubenstein. And as we know, the German Foreign Ministry was filled with crypto Jewish, advancing the Bolshevik cause.

Max Warburg, Parvus, and also Rasputin’s close buddy, Rubenstein, helped the Bolsheviks get in touch with the Imperial Bank of Germany.

This is a testimony from Alexander A. Khvostov, former prime minister of Imperial Russia, an ultra nationalist, a monarchist and a stark opponent of the Bolsheviks. He was arrested when the Freemasonic Provisional Government took over and was shot dead soon after Bolsheviks took over.

”Question: How did you sense the role of Rasputin?

Khvostov: He was a very convenient means for German espionage. Although I did not catch him in espionage, it logically seemed to me that he was a spy, not a conscious one, but a tool for espionage, because it was very easy to find out through him what was going on in Tsarskoye Selo. Obviously, the Germans are very clever people….It seems to me that he was in the hands of German agents. I tried to catch them, but failed.

There were several suspicious persons around him, but I had no information to act on. I suspected Hartvig [Alexandra Hartvig, a nurse who managed the Empress’s war supply department]: an investigation was being conducted about her, which was later discontinued. She was suspicious. Then there was Dolgorukaya [Princess Olga Dolgorukaya], who lived at the Astoria and behaved suspiciously. She was some adventuress who had bought the title by marrying Prince Dolgoruky. Rasputin visited her…In my testimony on the Rubinstein [Dmitri Rubenstein, involved in multiple businesses, later arrested for his financial corruption] case I set forth in detail the reason why I believed that Rasputin was a spy. I found the following facts. Rubenstein gave Rasputin instructions to go to Tsarskoye Selo to find out about any military offenses that were planned, as Rubenstein said he needed to know in order to buy timber….Rasputin told me that he did as asked and related what he had learned to Rubenstein….Rasputin was extremely contemptuous of the former Emperor’s personality but he very much approved of the former Empress, said that she was clever, that she was Catherine II, and in general praised her terribly.

He treated the former emperor in such a way that the detectives thought it inconvenient for them to write down what he said in their notes. He only referred to him as “Papa.” I heard him say: “I was at Tsarkoye and when I entered Papa was sitting there all sad. I stroked his head and said, ‘Why are you sad?’ He answered, ‘All the scoundrels are around! There are no boots, no guns. We have to advance, but we can’t advance!’…Rasputin asked him for details of the attack….Whether Rubinstein needed this information in order to buy timber, or in order to report to Berlin by radio telegraph…is difficult to establish…”

https://atlantismagazine.substack.com/p/the-1917-interrogation-alexei-nikolaevich

From the same testimony, check this out, the Tsar defended Rubinstein by not providing any support to bring charges against him.

”Khvostov: In the case of Rubinstein’s espionage, Manasevich-Manuilov [Ivan Manasevich-Manuilov, former official in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, arrested for embezzlement but Rasputin arranged for the charges to be dismissed], as an experienced man, could divert any case like an old fox from its hole. It seems to me that this is why the Rubinstein case has not gone to trial….When I had the information against Rubenstein, I made a categorical report to the Emperor. He went to the window, did not want to listen, pretending that he was not interested. I asked him to listen to him. The report was so complete and finally he said, “Do what you want. I believe you.””

”Do what you want”.. I.E.. I am not going to do anything about it myself, and without my support or my inner circles support like Rasputin.. nothing will happen to Rubinstein..”

Are we starting to see a trend of the Tsar defending criminal Jews?

Here is a letter written by an officer in the Imperial Army that laid out very insightful perspective about Nicholas II.

Part I | Part II
By Andy Sloan
July 7, 2019 Anno Domini

“For seventy years, from the Bolshevik Revolution to the closing years of the Gorbachev regime, militant atheism was the official religion, one might say, of the Soviet Union, and the Communist Party was, in effect, the established church. It was an avowed task of the Soviet state, led by the Communist Party, to root out from the minds and hearts of the Soviet state, all belief systems other than Marxism-Leninism.”

— J. D. Van der Vyver, John Witte – Religious human rights in global perspective: legal perspectives

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 26, 2012 Anno Domini
Part I | Part II

If Christianity were the crypto-Jewish plot Charles Giuliani and his ilk claim it is, why then didn’t the Jewish Bolshevists use it instead of atheism-nihilism (materialism and naturalism) to topple the Tsar and enslave the Russian people? Why did the Jewish-Masonic revolutionaries bring down the Christian aristocracy in once-Catholic France in order to realize the bloody success of the French Revolution?

Giuliani claims Christianity and religion in general are tools for oppression and control yet we find Illuminati regimes past and present using anything and everything diametrically opposed to Christianity to enslave the masses. Godlessness, in fact, was successful in absolutely oppressing and enslaving the Russian and French masses, not Christianity. But with the revolutionaries’ cries of the Jewish-Masonic slogan of “liberty, equality, and fraternity,” constantly echoing in the streets and the labour halls, the takeover had on a mask of liberation and democracy[1] that fooled most.

Now some may argue that the Jewish religion suffered persecution in the Soviet Union, and thus Soviet state atheism could not have been part of the Jewish takeover but, instead, legitimate opposition to it. But this argument holds absolutely no water considering the fact that 90 per cent of Bolshevist officials were Jewish, not to mention leaders Vladimir Lenin, Karl Marx (Moses Mordechai Levi Marx), and Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein) were all Jewish. Even Stalin, who was married to a Jewess, founded the Union of Militant Atheists as a means to further eradicate Christianity from Russian culture. (The amount of information surrounding the Jewish engineering of the Russian Revolution is voluminous.)

In a shocking revelation, The Jewish Chronicle Supplement actually admitted on page three of its Feb. 26, 1937 edition that the pockets of Jewish persecution in the Soviet Union were the work of the hands of the Jews themselves and provided a means to an end for the greater Jewish-Bolshevist goals.

“It is a known fact in Russia, in so far as there was persecution of the Jewish religion, it never came from the higher staff authorities but from the Jewish Communists, who were, in most cases, sons of strictly religious fathers….”

Furthermore, we read in an article published in the January 1934 edition of American Jewish Journal:

“There is no doubt that the old, traditional Jewish synagogue is rapidly dying out in Russia. It is not dying because of Communist persecution, as many would like to believe, or any other outside influence, but simply because of a natural law of life. The youth has deserted it. Go over to the Jewish Communist Club on Tverskaya Street and you will find plenty of them.”

Jewish-mandated state atheism was so widespread and untouchable in the Soviet Union that it even regularly got away with defaming Jesus and the much-cherished Russian Orthodox Church. Under the murderous reign of Lenin and Stalin, Christian churches were burned, orthodox priests were tortured and crucified, and average Christians were murdered or rounded up to work as slaves in the Gulags. “Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism,” Lenin once said. Famous Russian playwright Mikhail Bulgakov accused a Soviet atheist magazine, Bezbozhnik (the godless), of being run by Jews in his 1925 diary. (The magazine was shut down in 1941 when the Nazis invaded the Soviet Union.)

“Today I went specially to the editorial office of Bezbozhnik. It is located in Kozmodemyanovsky Lane, not far from the Mossovet building. I was with MS and he charmed me from the outset…..In the evening when I leafed through the issues of Bezbozhnik I was shaken. Not by the blasphemy, of course it knows no limits, but it is only an external feature. The heart of the matter lies in the idea, which can be proved with reference to actual documents: Jesus Christ is depicted as a swindler and a scoundrel: the attack is directed at him. It is not hard to see whose work this is. This is a crime like no other.”

Of course, the Jews’ most revered religious text, the Babylonian Talmud, calls Jesus Christ many horrible things, not the least of which is a “bastard” and the “son of a whore.” It’s hardly a stretch to say that Bezbozhnik was regurgitating aspects of the Jewish Talmud.

Now, Giuliani can downplay my accusations and simply claim not to be an atheist but, instead, some kind of agnostic thinker. He makes a point of not saying exactly to what belief he subscribes. Regardless, his anti-religious rhetoric sprinkled with cheap critiques of International Jewry (“Elite Jew Pigs! Elite Jew Pigs!”) reveals that he is a dedicated nihilist walking in the tradition of Jewish Bolshevism, what is today called cultural Marxism. He attempts to cloud his audience’s perception of this by raising random shades of morality. On a recent Truth Hertz show, he criticized the television show Two and a Half Men for promoting “filth.”

Nihilism is fundamentally utilitarian and agnostic. For Giuliani to deny that, as a nihilist he has much in common with socialist and radical leftist Jews, is deceptive or self-deceptive. And this applies to all agnostic types in the movement who erroneously believe they serve as a bastion of pure anti-Judaism. For them to criticize Christianity as being a Jewish subversive organization is highly inappropriate and hypocritical.

Giuliani continually talks out both sides of his mouth. He calls the Bible evil while denying the validity of Christianity or religion at all. Meanwhile, Christianity is arguably the foremost religion to define evil and establish a standard by which to measure it. So, Giuliani rejects the Bible but accepts the Christian concept of evil. And he, nor his followers, see the contradiction in this?

Could Giuliani’s utter contempt for the Bible and his obsession with the idea of an unjust God springing from it possibly reveal his inner turmoil? The following assertion by the late Father Seraphim Rose seems to sum up well Giuliani’s struggle.

“Atheism, true ‘existential’ atheism burning with hatred of a seemingly unjust or unmerciful God, is a spiritual state; it is a real attempt to grapple with the true God.… Nietzsche, in calling himself Antichrist, proved thereby his intense hunger for Christ.” —Nihilism: The Root of the Revolution of the Modern Age

Giuliani as a psychoanalyst in the tradition of Freud
In part 1 of this series, I claimed that Giuliani bordered on psychoanalyzing Christians and religious persons. But upon further reflection and after listening to more of his shows and reading his “books” (they are really nothing more than pamphlets for sale), I would go so far as to say that he indeed does exhibit the behaviour of a typical psychoanalyst.

“Folks, it’s schizophrenia; it really is,” he says of Christianity in one of his many and incessant pathologizations of Christianity and Western Culture.[2] This is just as Jewish psychoanalytic father Sigmund Freud proposed, that Christianity was nothing more than a mental illness, a neurosis that must be wiped out in order to free humanity. Christian self-denial and the suppression of sex, they say, result in evil and anti-Semitism via projection.

“Jews suffer to a lesser extent than gentiles from the erosion of cultural supports for high-investment parenting,” writes Professor Kevin MacDonald, one of the foremost critics of Freud today, “and Jews benefit by the decline in religious beliefs among gentiles. As Podhoretz (1995, 30) notes, it is in fact the case that Jewish intellectuals, Jewish organizations like the American Jewish Congress, and Jewish-dominated organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union have ridiculed Christian religious beliefs, attempted to undermine the public strength of Christianity, and have led the fight for unrestricted pornography. The evidence of this chapter indicates that psychoanalysis as a Jewish-dominated intellectual movement is a central component of this war on gentile cultural supports for high-investment parenting.”[3]

So where does the American Jewish Congress end and Charles Giuliani begin? The above statement by MacDonald is all the more interesting considering MacDonald himself is an atheist. He does not see Christianity as furthering Jewish evolutionary strategies but, instead, acting as a hindrance toward them.

Christianity easily the dominant force in the struggle against Jewish power
Whether it’s the Spanish Inquisition, the writings of the Church Fathers over 2,000 years, or the various Christian-initiated European pogroms, there is simply no question that Christianity has led the charge against Jewish power throughout the ages. Even the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD, where the sacred Jewish Temple of Solomon was destroyed and one million Jews killed, is considered to be the work of God through the Roman Empire, foretold in Christ’s Olivet discourse.

“And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to [him] for to shew him the buildings of the temple. And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? Verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.” —Matthew 24:1-2

“And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.” —Luke 21:20

From Protestant reformer Martin Luther (The Jews and their Lies, 1543) to Christian Sergius Nilus (Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, 1895) spreading the truth globally about the international Jewish conspiracy, Christians have led the charge into modern times. I doubt very much that the nihilist anti-Judaic could come up with a résumé that would even come close to matching that of Christianity.

Take a look at just some of the prominent names of those brave Christians who have fought the good fight on behalf of Christ and His Kingdom over the last 2,000 years. The following list is by no means comprehensive or in any particular order.

Sergius Nilus
Vicomte Léon de Poncins
Maurice Pinay
John the Baptist
Isaiah the Prophet
Jeremiah the Prophet
The 12 apostles of Christ
Benjamin Freedman
Texe Marrs
Mark Glenn (Charles Giuliani had the audacity to call Glenn a “Zionist” on his show with Revolt of the Plebs last week)
Jesus Christ
Origen
Doug Christie
Fritz Springmeier
Rev. I. B. Pranaitis
Arnold Leese
St. Augustine
St. John Chrysostom
Mel Gibson
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Lady Queenborough Edith Star Miller
James Keegstra
Michael Hoffman II
Flavius Josephus
Ted Pike
Ernst Zundel
Rev. Denis Fahey
H. A. Gwynne
Joseph M. Canfield
Carol Valentine
Elizabeth Dilling
Bobby Fisher
Athanasius
Bishop Richard Williamson
Brother Nathanael Kapner
Mordechai Vanunu
David Duke
Tertullian
James Shaw
Johann Andreas Eisenmenger
Stephen the Martyr
The Russian Tsar
A True Ott

If it weren’t for brave men and women like these, it is doubtful as to whether the anti-Jewish movement would exist today to the degree it does. If it weren’t for men like the above-mentioned, many would still be drinking the Holocaust Kool Aid today, among other flavours. Areligious people, not by any stretch of the imagination, can be credited for the depth of knowledge of world Jewry we have today. Professor Kevin MacDonald would be one exception, off the top of my head; I am sure there are others, but not many. The areligious opportunists like Giuliani know this fact, but they don’t care; they have hijacked this historically Christian movement for their own personal gain—with the only real beneficiaries being the Jews in this case.

Christians aim to help a person eliminate sin from their life—sin, which is at the root of the Jewish problem. Meanwhile, anti-Judaic atheist types attempt to eliminate the Jew only. Do you think sin will disappear with the Jew once he is finally dead and gone? No other group of people will rise up in the Jews’ place? This is as naive thinking as Giuliani levels against Christians. Do you think that no other group of people, other than the Jews, have oppressed humans.

If sin were a tree, Judaism would be its branches. And while anti-Judaic atheists spend all of their time shearing the branches, the Christian is down on the ground with an axe.

Christianity’s diametric opposition to Judaism
Judaism today remains a racist, exclusively tribalistic religion based on superstition, sorcery, witchcraft, subversion, dishonesty, carnality, and whose adherents are obsessed with law. In contrast, Christianity is universal in its outreach and based on love, justice, altruism, spirituality and repentance; although, its adherents don’t always live up to these. We are all human after all. It is true that Christianity came via the Hebrews, but it is not of the Hebrews. It is of God alone. No man may boast, and God is no respecter of men. And because greater Christianity absolutely rejects a Zionist interpretation of scripture, it is not a Zionist religion by any means, despite a small minority of “evangelicals” in the United States of America claiming different. (See John Hagee, Jack Van Impe et al.)

Revolt of the Plebs blogger Keith Johnson, another nihilist type in the truth movement, admits that the Jews had to insert footnotes into the Bible in order to Judaize the Church. But if Christianity is fundamentally Zionist, as Giuliani claims, the Jews should not have needed to create the Scofield Reference Bible in the first place.
Furthermore, if the Old Testament is such a Zionist influence, why then did the Pharisees see the need to create the Talmud and the Kabballah? Shouldn’t have the Old Testament sufficed? Following the Torah, the latter parts (majority of the Old Testament) are full of anti-Judaism, mainly in the writings of the prophets[4], whom the Jews murdered as a result. But Giuliani only ever focuses on the Mosaic books. The rest of the Old Testament doesn’t corroborate his bias interpretation of the Torah. And any Biblical scholar knows that true interpretation is based on other scripture—“Let scripture interpret scripture”, not on man’s thinking. A true rendering of the Torah cannot be obtained without first comparing it with the rest of scripture. Where inconsistencies are found, other places in the Bible clarify them.

While there is a form of nationalism in the Old Testament, what one could misconstrue as Zionism, it was merely a temporal condition and not the original or ultimate purpose of God. National Israel was a foreshadowing of a global people for God. (Foreshadowing is used in many places throughout the Bible, specifically when dealing with prophecy.) And that is where the New Testament comes into play, with its universalistic approach to God’s dealings with His creation.

“Modern orthodoxy is not the religion of the Bible and of the Prophets. It is a post-Biblical or Talmud religion built up by the Pharisees and doctors of the Law between the second and fifth centuries after Jesus Christ, to preserve the small minority of Jews who had not followed Christ, and to consummate the definite break from triumphant Christianity.

“The universalist, messianic, finalist Judaism of the Prophets ended with Jesus, and conquered the world in Christian form.

“Legal national Judaism kept its God exclusively in the community of its choice, which it has striven to protect from the dangers that constantly threaten it. It is based on an interpretation of Biblical texts by oral, not revealed, traditions called Mischna, Gemara, Halaka, and Hagada. This collection, known as the Talmud, was first conceived of in Jerusalem towards the end of the second century and completed in Babylon in the fifth century. The two Talmuds consist of eleven volumes in octavo and are twenty times the size of the Bible.”

(Dr. A. Roudinesco: Le Malheur d’Israel, pp. 114-115)

Renowned researcher Michael Hoffman, who strongly opposes the idea of a “Judeo-Christian” tradition, elaborates:

“There is no fundamental opposition between spirit and matter in Judaism. When Jesus declared in John chapter 6 that ‘the flesh profiteth nothing,’ he was violating the oral tradition of the Pharisees: ‘Rabbinic anthropology differs in this respect from…Christian-anthropology…there is not a fundamental metaphysical opposition between (body and soul)…’ Judaism celebrates the body to such a sordid extent that it even has a defecation prayer which every Talmudic male is commanded to recite every time he relieves himself: ‘Blessed art thou O Lord…who has made the human in its orifices and holes.’ Everything about Orthodox Judaism is either a distortion or falsification of the Old Testament, because it is based on anthropomorphic traditions that void the Old Testament by means of a series of dispensations and loopholes. These begin with the Mishnah, which represents the commitment to writing of the occult legends and lore of those Israelites who had preserved ‘secret knowledge’ which had arisen with the worship of the golden calf, of Molech and similar abominations. With the rejection of their Messiah and the commitment of the formerly oral traditions to writing, these Israelites completely abandoned themselves to a perversion which had once been only a persistent underground stream polluting Israel, but after Christ’s crucifixion, emerged as the main ideology of those who refused to accept Jesus as their savior.

(Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, pp. 145)