'Lynn de Rothschild agreed that Marx was right’: Valentin Katasonov
Quote from Timothy Fitzpatrick on June 16, 2025, 17:58Inclusive capitalism as an ideology
Based on the materials of publications on the website of the newspaper "Soviet Russia"
The latest behind-the-scenes plans of the world to restructure the world order, presented in the form of the book by Klaus Schwab and Thierry Mallere Covid-19: The Great Reset, I have summarized in the previous article into eight main provisions. Let's continue the conversation. One of the key concepts of "great perestroika" is Inclusive Capitalism, or, in Russian, capitalism "open to all", "all-encomprasing", "inclusive". Over decades of work, I have come across a huge number of definitions of capitalism, but "inclusive capitalism" is a novelty.
Apparently, the financial crisis of 2007-2009 finally convinced the world behind-the-scenes that the existing model of the world capitalist system has completely outlived itself. By "the world behind the scenes" I mean the owners of money (the main shareholders of the US Federal Reserve), striving to become the masters of the world.
Schwab has no clear definitions of "inclusive capitalism". Someone, talking about "all-encompassing" capitalism, will say that it is capitalism without the poor and beggars. Someone will say that in such a model everyone will be involved in economic activity. Someone will talk about the responsibility of "all-encomple" capitalism to future generations.
However, all this is verbal equilibrism. If you like - deception, cheap propaganda. I will cite as an example the high-level conference in London in May 2014, which was attended by IMF Executive Director Christine Lagarde, His Royal Highness Prince Charles, Lady Lynn de Rothschild, former U.S. President Bill Clinton, Lord Mayor of the City of London Fione Wolf. The main initiator of the meeting was Lynn de Rothschild. Shortly before that, she just came up with the Inclusive Capitalism initiative (so it wasn't the Professor Schwab who invented it). Christine Lagarde's performance was especially curious at that meeting.
First, she confirmed that the authorship of the idea belongs to Mrs. Rothschild: "We are all gathered here to discuss "comprehensive capitalism", which must be Lynn's idea!"Secondly, Lagarde reached Marx and concluded that, from his point of view, "comprehensive capitalism" is a phrase containing incompatible concepts: "The official consolidation of the word "capitalism" occurs in the XIX century. With the industrial revolution came Karl Marx, who focused on the appropriation of the means of production and who predicted that capitalism with its excesses carries the seeds of its own destruction - the accumulation of capital in the hands of a few, mainly striving to accumulate profit, leads to serious conflicts and cyclical crises. So, is "comprehensive capitalism" an oxymoron?"
In Marx, of course, capitalism is not "inclusive", but, on the contrary, "exclusive". He pushes "exta" people out of public production, leaving them in poverty and destitution. It excludes millions from any form of public life. Marx called it the universal law of capitalist accumulation: in the course of capitalist development, socio-economic polarization of society occurs; at one pole - a small handful of rich and super-rich, at the other - the overwhelming part of society in the form of the poor and beggars.
Well, both Christine Lagarde, Prince Charles, and Lady Lynn de Rothschild agreed that Marx was right. However, he, they say, described capitalism that existed 150-200 years ago. And today capitalism can and should turn from exclusive to inclusive, comprehensive.
It's been the seventh year since that London meeting. Has world capitalism become even a little more inclusive? No! It develops according to Marx's universal law of capitalist accumulation: the rich become even richer, the poor even poorer. In January 2020, on the eve of the 50th meeting in Davos, the non-governmental organization Oxfam released a report on the distribution of wealth in the world. According to this report, the fortune of 2,153 billionaires living on the planet exceeds the amount of all the money available to 60 percent of the world's population. Comments are superfluous.
If we analyze what Schwab said about the "new" model of capitalism, it all comes down to the proposal to abandon the principle of profit maximization. They say that business should realize that the era of capital growth is coming to an end, the average profit in many industries and in many markets tends to zero. By the way, the same George Soros joked about twenty years ago: "The music is over, and they are still dancing." And it is better to recall Karl Marx, who a century and a half ago formulated the law of the tendency of the rate of profit to decrease and said that as a result of the growth of the technical structure of capital (displacement of labor by machines), the rate of profit may fall to zero.
So, Schwab, following Mrs. Lynn de Rothschild, decided to save capitalism by declaring it "inclusive". First, profit should no longer be the goal and the main benchmark of business success. Secondly, companies should meet consumers by reducing prices and gradually eradicating poverty and destitution. Thirdly, the usual idea that corporations belong to shareholders should be abandoned.
Here I will mention the American Business Roundtable (BRT), representing many of the largest companies in the United States. The governing bodies of BRT include Jeff Bezos from Amazon, Tim Cook from Apple, Mary Barra from General Motors and other famous figures who occupy the first lines of the ratings of the richest people in America and the world. BRT said last year that the principle of shareholder supremacy is outdated and that obligations should apply to all stakeholders (company employees, suppliers and contractors, product consumers, the state). The business round table aimed to promote "an economy that serves all Americans", not just shareholders.
Klaus Schwab welcomes this and adds: "The company's goal is to involve all stakeholders in a joint and sustainable value creation process." That is, every company should become "inclusive", and inclusive capitalism should not be built by the state, but such companies. The state should gradually "absorb" (bee included) by inclusive companies, but not die out, as in classical Marxism, but be privatized by the largest corporations.
For several centuries, capitalism has existed in the world, in which the principle of Homo homini lupus est (Man to man is a wolf) reigns. For many generations, the materels of the wolves of capitalism were also nurtured, devouring the weaker ones. And so the wolves declare that they are ready to eat grass from now on?!
Let's leave the nonsense. The notorious inclusive capitalism is a smokescreen over the plans of the global elite on the way to the future, which can be called and
post-capitalism, and new feudalism, and a new slave-owning structure. The global elite is ready to refuse to continue the pursuit of profit, but it will not give up power under any circumstances. The "Great Reconstruction" is designed to preserve and strengthen this power.The owners of money intend to convert their capital into absolute world domination.
Valentin KATASONOV
Inclusive capitalism as an ideology
Based on the materials of publications on the website of the newspaper "Soviet Russia"
The latest behind-the-scenes plans of the world to restructure the world order, presented in the form of the book by Klaus Schwab and Thierry Mallere Covid-19: The Great Reset, I have summarized in the previous article into eight main provisions. Let's continue the conversation. One of the key concepts of "great perestroika" is Inclusive Capitalism, or, in Russian, capitalism "open to all", "all-encomprasing", "inclusive". Over decades of work, I have come across a huge number of definitions of capitalism, but "inclusive capitalism" is a novelty.
Apparently, the financial crisis of 2007-2009 finally convinced the world behind-the-scenes that the existing model of the world capitalist system has completely outlived itself. By "the world behind the scenes" I mean the owners of money (the main shareholders of the US Federal Reserve), striving to become the masters of the world.
Schwab has no clear definitions of "inclusive capitalism". Someone, talking about "all-encompassing" capitalism, will say that it is capitalism without the poor and beggars. Someone will say that in such a model everyone will be involved in economic activity. Someone will talk about the responsibility of "all-encomple" capitalism to future generations.
However, all this is verbal equilibrism. If you like - deception, cheap propaganda. I will cite as an example the high-level conference in London in May 2014, which was attended by IMF Executive Director Christine Lagarde, His Royal Highness Prince Charles, Lady Lynn de Rothschild, former U.S. President Bill Clinton, Lord Mayor of the City of London Fione Wolf. The main initiator of the meeting was Lynn de Rothschild. Shortly before that, she just came up with the Inclusive Capitalism initiative (so it wasn't the Professor Schwab who invented it). Christine Lagarde's performance was especially curious at that meeting.
First, she confirmed that the authorship of the idea belongs to Mrs. Rothschild: "We are all gathered here to discuss "comprehensive capitalism", which must be Lynn's idea!"
Secondly, Lagarde reached Marx and concluded that, from his point of view, "comprehensive capitalism" is a phrase containing incompatible concepts: "The official consolidation of the word "capitalism" occurs in the XIX century. With the industrial revolution came Karl Marx, who focused on the appropriation of the means of production and who predicted that capitalism with its excesses carries the seeds of its own destruction - the accumulation of capital in the hands of a few, mainly striving to accumulate profit, leads to serious conflicts and cyclical crises. So, is "comprehensive capitalism" an oxymoron?"
In Marx, of course, capitalism is not "inclusive", but, on the contrary, "exclusive". He pushes "exta" people out of public production, leaving them in poverty and destitution. It excludes millions from any form of public life. Marx called it the universal law of capitalist accumulation: in the course of capitalist development, socio-economic polarization of society occurs; at one pole - a small handful of rich and super-rich, at the other - the overwhelming part of society in the form of the poor and beggars.
Well, both Christine Lagarde, Prince Charles, and Lady Lynn de Rothschild agreed that Marx was right. However, he, they say, described capitalism that existed 150-200 years ago. And today capitalism can and should turn from exclusive to inclusive, comprehensive.
It's been the seventh year since that London meeting. Has world capitalism become even a little more inclusive? No! It develops according to Marx's universal law of capitalist accumulation: the rich become even richer, the poor even poorer. In January 2020, on the eve of the 50th meeting in Davos, the non-governmental organization Oxfam released a report on the distribution of wealth in the world. According to this report, the fortune of 2,153 billionaires living on the planet exceeds the amount of all the money available to 60 percent of the world's population. Comments are superfluous.
If we analyze what Schwab said about the "new" model of capitalism, it all comes down to the proposal to abandon the principle of profit maximization. They say that business should realize that the era of capital growth is coming to an end, the average profit in many industries and in many markets tends to zero. By the way, the same George Soros joked about twenty years ago: "The music is over, and they are still dancing." And it is better to recall Karl Marx, who a century and a half ago formulated the law of the tendency of the rate of profit to decrease and said that as a result of the growth of the technical structure of capital (displacement of labor by machines), the rate of profit may fall to zero.
So, Schwab, following Mrs. Lynn de Rothschild, decided to save capitalism by declaring it "inclusive". First, profit should no longer be the goal and the main benchmark of business success. Secondly, companies should meet consumers by reducing prices and gradually eradicating poverty and destitution. Thirdly, the usual idea that corporations belong to shareholders should be abandoned.
Here I will mention the American Business Roundtable (BRT), representing many of the largest companies in the United States. The governing bodies of BRT include Jeff Bezos from Amazon, Tim Cook from Apple, Mary Barra from General Motors and other famous figures who occupy the first lines of the ratings of the richest people in America and the world. BRT said last year that the principle of shareholder supremacy is outdated and that obligations should apply to all stakeholders (company employees, suppliers and contractors, product consumers, the state). The business round table aimed to promote "an economy that serves all Americans", not just shareholders.
Klaus Schwab welcomes this and adds: "The company's goal is to involve all stakeholders in a joint and sustainable value creation process." That is, every company should become "inclusive", and inclusive capitalism should not be built by the state, but such companies. The state should gradually "absorb" (bee included) by inclusive companies, but not die out, as in classical Marxism, but be privatized by the largest corporations.
For several centuries, capitalism has existed in the world, in which the principle of Homo homini lupus est (Man to man is a wolf) reigns. For many generations, the materels of the wolves of capitalism were also nurtured, devouring the weaker ones. And so the wolves declare that they are ready to eat grass from now on?!
Let's leave the nonsense. The notorious inclusive capitalism is a smokescreen over the plans of the global elite on the way to the future, which can be called and
post-capitalism, and new feudalism, and a new slave-owning structure. The global elite is ready to refuse to continue the pursuit of profit, but it will not give up power under any circumstances. The "Great Reconstruction" is designed to preserve and strengthen this power.
The owners of money intend to convert their capital into absolute world domination.
Valentin KATASONOV