By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 8, 2024 Anno Domini

The rhetoric that Zionist Israel is a colonialist Anglo-American creation is a cover story for the Soviet procurement, financing, and staffing of the Marxist state of Israel.

It seems that this cover story is part of the Soviets’ Operation SIG (Zionist government), whose aim is to frame the West and white Europeans for any perceived evils coming from the Zionist movement and the state of Israel in preparation for the discrediting and eventual destruction of the West to make way for Soviet world imperium.

Israel was founded on May 13, 1948 by the recently Soviet-founded United Nations and its Partition Plan for Palestine (Resolution 181), and the Soviets were the first power to officially recognize de jure Israel.^[1] On 29 November 1947, Soviet foreign minister Andrei Gromyko (suspected crypto-Jew^[2]) stood up at the podium before the U.N. General Assembly in New York and called for the partition of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states following a long speech about how badly the Jews had been done to and the horrors of the Holocaust. The Assembly then cast their votes, with 33 nations voting in favour, 13 against, and 10 more abstaining. Of those 33 in favour, 16 were either Soviet Bloc countries or had Euro-Communist styled “social democrat” governments (another three countries voting yes to the partition plan had masonic-led governments). The socialists/Communists won the vote for “Israel”. They were the deciding factor. With the majority Soviet Bloc swinging the vote, Israel would not have been founded, regardless of the United States (a reluctant “yes” vote under duress) and Great Britain (abstained from vote).

“Stalin then organized the Eastern European Communist states to vote for the creation of Israel as the decisive bloc that provided the two-thirds majority needed for victory in the UN vote of November 29, 1947,” admitted Israel’s Ynet News in its 2015 article The Soviet Union’s forgotten role in the creation of Israel.^[3]

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s deranged strategist Aleksandr Dugin said, “at a definite stage these ‘red-brown’ Jewish Eurasianists also have prepared the creation of the state of Israel, having started under the direction (and the approval) of Moscow.”^[4]

President Harry Truman (freemason), representing the United States, voted yes; although, the American nod was coerced with the help of pestering American Jews in Washington. Truman’s administration warned him about Soviet manipulation.^[5]

“Truman was opposed by his own administration and especially by the top officials of the State Department, then led by Secretary of State Marshall, all of whom who were afraid the Arab nations would be driven into the Soviet bloc and, subsequently, close off their oil wells, which, in turn, would bring the industry and economic growth of the superpower to a halt.”

Marshall sensed what was to come of the partition plan.

Further reluctance to granting Jewish statehood was displayed by Truman when he boldly sated, “Jesus Christ couldn’t please them when he was here on earth, so how could anyone expect that I would have any luck?”^[6]

This should put to rest Soviet-seeded lies about Zionism being an extension of Anglo-American imperialism (colonialism) and the strategically placed “ZOG” narrative designed to mislead as to the true nature of the Jewish-masonic conspiracy. The West is not to blame whatsoever. Subsequent British-American policies supporting Israel and Zionism up to present time are under duress due to further Judeo-masonic and KGB subversion of their governments and the deceiving of Western masses as to the true purpose of supporting Israel and Zionism (the draining of Western resources for ultimate Soviet gain, technology transfers to hostile Eastern powers via Israel [like the U.S. traitor Jonathan Pollard], and the displacement of mostly Islamic hordes for eventual subversive placement in Western nations to disrupt the Christian fabric of society). It seems that Anglo-American support for Israel post 1948 is under the false impression that supporting Israel would curtail the spread of Islam and its Jihadist ways. Had this actually been the case, Western support for Zionism would have been justified; however, we now know that Jewry strategically has been supporting Islamic expansion as revenge against Christianity.

Those who object to the facts of Israel’s founding—those hell bent on blaming the “Anglo-American establishment” for all the world’s problems might argue that although the British abstained from partition plan vote, the Balfour Declaration provided the substance for the eventual formation of the Zionist state. This also isn’t accurate. The idea of a post-Christ Jewish homeland in the Middle East was not new and not Western. In 1881, Russian Jew Leon Pinsker (Lev Semyonovich Pinsker) founded the Rothschild-backed Lovers of Zion (Hibbat Zion), whose aim was to foster Jewish emigration from Russia to Palestine in reaction to Russia’s pogroms. Pinsker’s Zionist organization was only one of several founded by Russian and Eastern European Jews at that time. In 1890, the anti-Jewish Russia Tsar even granted charity status to Pinsker’s The Society for the Support of Jewish Farmers and Artisans in Syria and Eretz Israel, also known as the Odessa Committee (composed of some 4,000 members). Pinsker died a year later and the Committee was eventually absorbed by Theodore Herzl’s World Zionist Organization after the First Zionist Congress in 1897 (from which the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are believed to have originated). Without these Eurasian-based Zionist organizations, it’s unlikely that Israel would have been founded, especially considering Rothschild’s failed attempt to get the British to see the project through. The British eventually became aware, to some degree, of the true nature of the Zionist movement and called World Zionist Organization president Chaim Weizmann and his group “Communists”.^[7] Even just after Balfour declared for the Zionist state, the British continued to support Arab independence in Palestine. Providing further reluctance to the British were the routine assassinations and public hangings of British troops in Mandatory Palestine by fanatical Marxist Jewish terrorists—all tied in some way to the plethora of Eurasian-based Zionist organizations (these same Marxist Jewish terrorists went on to found Israel’s defense organizations, like Mossad. Former Mossad officer Juval Aviv admitted that “Mossad…it’s an old Russian school”). By 1947, Balfour’s declaration in support of a Jewish homeland had faded from the memory of a weary British establishment. They had had enough. They withdrew from Palestine and refused to vote in favour of Stalin’s Soviet Zionist initiative. World Jewry had repaid British peacekeeping in Palestine with treason and murder and created a void just waiting to be filled by Stalin and the Soviets.

“Stalin hoped that Israel’s creation would lead to chaos in the region and bring about the downfall of the British Empire; and that Israel, with strong socialist leadership, might become a quasi-satellite of the Soviet Union.”^[8]

With nearly every single Prime Minister of Israel, even up to current PM Binyamin Netanyahu, being Soviet derived^[9] and the Marxist-styled society that developed in Israel after 1948^[10], it appears that Stalin’s wishes came true.

Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion admitted “that without the Soviet arms, the state would never have survived the onslaught of five Arab armies.”^[11]

Romanian Soviet defector Ion Mihai Pacepa claimed that the use of Israel as a Communist weapon against the capitalist West continued well after Stalin and that then KGB head Yuri Andropov executed Operation SIG to really draw out Soviet-styled anti-colonialism in the Middle East, Africa, Latin America, and the Islamic world in general. That idea was that if the Soviets could use Israel to very visibly Balkanize the Middle East (as outlined in the Oded Yinon Plan) under the banner of the Balfour Declaration and the West, the Soviets could achieve control in the region while the West would be blamed for the genocide and human rights violations the Soviets themselves had implemented. Meanwhile, the anti-Zionist world, unaware that the Soviets were orchestrating the entire thing, would come to the Soviet side in the hopes of being liberated from supposed colonialist “Zionist oppression”. Arab support for the Soviets would allow the Soviets to further penetrate Islamic Jihad movements and arm and control the Arab side of the conflict, in accordance with the Leninist-styled dialectical method^[12]. Andropov’s deceptive plan would not only turn the Arab world against the West, it would also help radicalize the West’s burgeoning Leftist movement against its own “Zionist occupied” governments, creating further destabilization of Western societies.

Stalin’s use of the Zionist state in the Communist offensive would reach levels that perhaps even he couldn’t have imagined. What started out as perhaps only a device to stick it to the British evolved into a highly sophisticated dialectic that has been a thorn in the side of the West ever since. It has directly contributed to the West’s ongoing demise and is uplifting the Eurasianist neo-Soviet East to be the single world superpower.

“Let’s agree with the formation of Israel. It will be like an awl in the ass for the Arab states and make them turn their backs on Britain… British influence will be completely undermined in Egypt, Syria, Turkey and Iraq,” Stalin said.^[13]

Notes:

1. Lokshin, Alexander, Soviet Union and Israel: From Recognition to Severing Diplomatic Relations (1948–1953), Lechaim Magazine, May 14, 2023 – https://fitzinfo.net/forum/topic/stalin-lets-agree-with-the-formation-of-israel-it-will-be-like-an-awl-in-the-ass-for-the-arab-states-and-make-them-turn-their-backs-on-britain/ ↑
2. List of disguised Jews – https://hasid.livejournal.com/220465.html ↑
3. Adelman, Jonathan, The Soviet Union’s forgotten role in the creation of Israel, Dec. 12, 2015, Ynet News – https://fitzinfo.net/2021/03/21/the-soviet-unions-forgotten-role-in-the-creation-of-israel/ ↑
4. Dugin on the Jews – https://niqnaq.wordpress.com/2013/11/07/dugin-on-the-jews/ ↑
5. Huvila, Risto, President Truman and UN Vote 1947 – Blessing or Curse?, Times of Israel, November 30, 2019 – https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/president-truman-and-un-vote-1947-blessing-or-curse/ ↑
6. ibid ↑
7. Gorodetsky, Gabriel, The Soviet Union and the Creation of the State of Israel, pg. 4, Tel Aviv University, 2001 ↑
8. Adelman, Jonathan, The Soviet Union’s forgotten role in the creation of Israel, Dec. 12, 2015, Ynet News ↑
9. Bernstein, Jack, The Life of An American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel, The New York—Moscow—Tel Aviv Triangle, 1984 – https://fitzinfo.net/2019/05/16/new-york-moscow-tel-aviv-triangle/ ↑
10. Bernstein, Jack, The Life of An American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel, 1984 – https://fitzinfo.net/2020/05/14/communism-in-israel/ ↑
11. Adelman, Jonathan, The Soviet Union’s forgotten role in the creation of Israel, Dec. 12, 2015, Ynet News ↑
12. Bernstein, Jack, My Farewell to Israel, the Thorn in the Mideast, Pro-American Press, 1985 – https://fitzinfo.net/2020/05/21/matzpen-the-jewish-communist-party-of-israel-and-the-kibbutzim-network/ ↑
13. Lokshin, Alexander, Soviet Union and Israel: From Recognition to Severing Diplomatic Relations (1948–1953), Lechaim Magazine, May 14, 2023 ↑

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
October 22, 2023

We know that world Jewry is behind the radical Left and the Islamo-African invasion of the West, but Zionism has a script to follow, and it is one that could be exploited for Western gain.

Zionism is a tool for world Jewry (elite Jews), not an end in itself. But for many average Jews (especially conservative ones), Zionism is the end and they wholeheartedly believe in it, as do many Protestants. It seems these are the kind of Zionists with which the West could ally in order to help battle world Jewry’s greater plans of using the Left and Islam to clear the world of whites, Christians, and conservatives in preparation for their world Communist Hasidic empire.

The Zionist script is fundamentally nationalistic, moralistic, and ethno-centric, which is what the West had been up until about the 1960s when world Jewry introduced their immigration schemes and cultural Marxism. World Jewry doesn’t care for nationalism because world Jewry is cosmopolitan (Chabad admits it is “not Zionistic). Nationalism is a hindrance to their advancement. They are after world government while rank-and-file Jews simply want a homeland of their own and to, more or less, live under the security of Western mores. Ultimately, world Jewry is stringing along little Jews with a deliberately handicapped Zionism. We know this is true because world Jewry funds the anti-Zionists as well, mainly through their Eurasian channels (Russia, China, North Korea), and more and more portrays Zionism unfavourably in their mass media racket. When Soviet garden gnome Henry Kissinger not long ago predicted the imminent end to the state of Israel, he wasn’t making an educated guess, he was revealing part of world Jewry’s plan.

The trick for us is to use the Western-friendly aspects of Zionism to keep Islam and the Left under control, especially in Western countries. World Jewry knows that Zionism does not have the full support of the West and conservatives, and it prefers it this way so that it doesn’t have to push too hard in advancing the conservative values that little Jews want (before you read on here, make sure you understand what Operation SIG is all about). World Jewry just advances Zionism enough that it suits their cause of keeping the Middle East perpetually destabilized (via the Yinon Plan and Operation SIG), draining America and Britain’s reserves, and in turning the world against the West (via anti-Zionist, anti-colonialist indignation, victimization of Arabs). Your average Jew is not after these things. They want things similar to Western conservatives. Therefore, by Western conservatives coming together in support of little Jew Zionism, world Jewry’s hand is forced to advance the Zionist fundamentals that check Islamo-Leftist goals (in Israel and in allied countries like the United States, Canada, England, etc.).

You might ask how exactly this tactic would force world Jewry’s hand. It’s very simple. World Jewry fears the little Jews realizing that they are being played by their elder brothers, so they must meet their demands or else the house of cards will come crashing down and world Jewry will lose the support of its own rank-and-file members. This would create all sorts of new problems for their world program, and that is something it doesn’t seem they are prepared to tolerate. By Western conservatives supporting little Jew Zionism in greater numbers, it becomes much more difficult for world Jewry to ignore the demands of the rank and file. It might be hard for some to believe, but it seems that little Jews are under as much control, if not more, as we gentiles in the West are.

There is yet another set of hands that would be forced to act against Islam and the Left should Western conservatives come together in support of little Jew Zionism. The hands of Western governments. They are obedient to world Jewry; however, they may not be in the know of the elite Jew vs. little Jew toxic relationship. Therefore, they might not know the difference when little Jewry calls for such and such action that World Jewry does not necessarily want. For example, little Jew Zionists could demand restricted borders to Islamists in the United States (something that actually started to happen shortly after 9/11, but its momentum eventually fizzled out) and Western governments would be greatly pressured to act, especially with a large base of Western conservatives backing said little Jews. The above is just one example. There are many other commonalities we share with little Jews that could be used to pressure our governments to actually govern in our sovereign favour.

In order for this tactic to work more effectively, more Jews would have to support Zionism as well. By design, it seems that Zionism is losing a lot of support in Israel itself, as many Israeli Jews are moving toward the Left. The evidence of this is the growing support for LGBT, unfettered immigration, and anti-Zionism in Israel. The popular anti-Bibi rhetoric is an effect of this and not some awakening to the Soviet Israel control over the region as it might seem.

It seems that world Jewry’s larger goal here in this advanced stage is to destroy the West using anti-Zionism. But in order to do this, they will have to sacrifice the state of Israel in the process. They are OK with this. As I mentioned, their Zionism won’t be limited merely to the borders of Palestine but will encompass the entire globe.

We are no longer living under ideal governance in the West and the above strategy just might help us. At the very least, it might buy us a bit more time.

Championing anti-Zionism or Islam (Arabs, Palestinians, Persians etc,) is suicide for the West.

By Ryan Augustine

The pro-Zionist and anti-Zionist movements have become bellwethers in the current geopolitics. In fact, there are more U.N. resolutions regarding Israel and Palestine than there are for any other country or conflict. It is a strange thing, too, that such a small piece of land has become such a focal point when there are many more pressing issues and conflicts in the world today. Most people not within the ruling class likewise hold strong opinions on the subject, and I think that these opinions are more guided by emotion than by clear thinking. Pro-Zionism seems to be emotionally regulated by the collective guilt people feel over the holocaust (TM), Jewish persecution in general, and protestant religious beliefs. The Anti-Zionist movement is much murkier and seems to be an amalgamation of Islamic beliefs, Marxism, egalitarianism, anti-colonialism, some Christian beliefs, anti-Jewishness, and a whole host of other things. Thus, for the common man, the anti-Zionist movement is the more incoherent of the two and the argument who’s end goals are less thought out. Therefore, the purpose of this piece will be to delve into the logical outcomes of Anti-Zionism to help shed light on the issue.

Firstly, it is important to understand that there are differences within Anti-Zionism of what anti-Zionism means and what its goals should be. Without going into the weeds too much and to understand these differences, let us first give Zionism a definition. This article hereby defines Zionism as the right of self determination for the Jewish people to have a country within the rough geography of modern-day Israel.

Back to the question at hand, this article will therefore tackle these differences within the anti-Zionist movement on a one-by-one basis. Note these will be framed in generalities and is by no means an exhaustive list. I do not have time or am qualified to write a book on the subject. Nor will I discuss the feasibility of achieving the positions, for that would be an entirely different article, this piece is focused on logical outcomes.

The first difference is that the U.S., the West in general, should divorce itself from the Israeli state, stop funding it, and let it be what it will be. This is the most moderate and reasonable of the anti-Zionist positions. There are both pros and cons to pursuing such a policy. First, the pros: our governments would save money to the tune of tens of billions of dollars per year; we would be less vulnerable to espionage and subversion; less likely to be entrapped in foreign military conflicts; we could perhaps go after the dual citizen issue; our politicians would not prostrate themselves before the wall; the West would start to have closure over the holocaust; and we could start to build better relations with the Arab countries. The Cons are: Israel and Jews supporting Israel would become hostile to Christians and the West; Israel would seek to cement alliances with Russia and China. The Arab world, which had previously aligned itself with the Soviets against Israel and the West would not come around to the West soon and would be more likely to join back with Russia and China, as they would thenl move into the middle east as the U.S. withdrew from it. They would be more inclined to do so, as China and Russia would put pressure on them, and China could offer them a burgeoning oil market greater than the oil market offered by Western countries. The West, whose people still find oppression and war crimes abhorrent, have previously reigned in Israeli hostility. The Russians and Chinese would not; thus, it is probable that such a dramatic shift in power would be the cause of new and greater conflicts as the West seeks to prevent Communist Middle East hegemony, and Israel, Russia, and China awould be emboldened to seek it at the expense of what Arab allies the West could pull together. If this position is to be successful, it must be executed very precisely to avoid the more dire ramifications.

The second position is the so called two-state solution whereby Israel returns to its pre-1967 borders and the Palestinians are granted their own state. The pros are that this position would grant both the Palestinians and the Israeli’s what they want: Israel still retains a country and the Palestinians would no longer be oppressed by the Israelis. The cons are as follows: hundreds of thousands of Israelis would be evicted from their homes; Palestine would still be an oppressive Islamo-Marxist state; religious tensions would mount, especially over the dome of the rock and wailing wall, as there would be two governing bodies over each. Israel would feel very insecure and seek any pretext for retaking its land; thus, it is more than likely the U.S. would be drawn into another middle eastern conflict. Furthermore, this position would entrench the status quo and the dialectic between the Israelis and Palestinians will be used as a dialectic.

The third position is that Israel, as a nation state, should cease to exist. The Pros are that there would be no more Israeli-Palestinian conflict and no more money going to Israel. The Palestinians would have their own country, and relations with the Arab world would likely improve. The cons are as follows: whether you believe it or not, Israel was founded illegally. After some point in time, a country which is founded illegally becomes legitimized. This time period would vary depending on who the people who created the country are and where and from whom they have carved it out. In the case of the colonization of America, a few months were sufficient. In Western countries being colonized by Africans, 10,000 years would not suffice (1). In the case of Israel, you have Jews who have been born under the Israeli flag for four generations, so whether or not Israel was illegally settled has become a moot point. There would be a massive Jewish refugee problem whereby six million jews would seek resettlement in Western countries; thus, all western nations would be Judaized by a very significant factor. Zionist supporters and Jewish refugees, instead of focusing their efforts and money on Israel, would now spend those resources on changing to their liking the countries they inhabit and we would see an acceleration of the social and moral decay we are witnessing now. Furthermore, the destruction of Israel would advance the International Communist position of anti-colonialism, and the West could be wrongfooted into atoning for all of its alleged sins against the non-western world, as the concept of an ethnic nation state as a legitimate form of government would lose a lot of its legitimacy. The U.S. and the West would also lose face for supporting Israel for so long, just to destroy her. Many Jews and Christians, especially Protestants, would lose their faith, as they view Israel fulfilling prophecy, and the ecumenical New Age movement would be strengthened handsomely. Islam would likewise be strengthened, and it would be seen in the Islamic world as a great victory; thus, with the breakdown of the concept of the nation-state and a resurgent Islam, the West ccould expect to see more Muslim immigrants and greater Islamic belligerence.

I’m going to cut this article short, but I hope I have covered enough material to present a good analysis. If you, the reader, feel that I missed something important, please let me know. One last thing, since these positions have a lot of drawbacks, I will present one that has better outcomes which I have not heard talked about, which is neither an anti-Zionist nor pro-Zionist idea. This would be the one-state solution; whereby, Israel subsumes all the Palestinian lands, yet grants citizenship. Palestinians who wouldn’t want citizenship would be kicked out. Israel would complain that this would undermine the Idea of having a Jewish state, but I say that the Jews push multiculturalism onto us, so what’s good for the goose is good for the Gander. If Israel really wants to, they can rewrite their constitution to make it more Jewish. I hear they are good with that legal type of stuff. God bless.

1. Ruling Steward – Tolkien Gateway

By Fronda.pl
August 11, 2017
Translated from Polish

In Zbigniew Brzeziński’s […] book The Big Chessboard, America and the Rest of the World, the key word m is “Eurasia”. control of Eurasia, control of the entire globe.

The central position on the Eurasian continent is occupied by Russia – a country that geographically belongs to both Europe and Asia, but in terms of civilization and culture, it belongs to neither one nor the other. Already at the beginning of the 19th century, Piotr Chaadayev wrote: “We have never walked with other nations, we do not belong to any great family of humanity, neither to the East nor to the West. Tradition binds us neither to one nor the other. We are as if out of time and we were not touched by the process of humanity in its development. “

According to Vladimir Pastuchow, “Russian culture is heterogeneous, combining European individualism with the Asian concept of community. Eurasianism is currently perceived too one-sidedly, as opposing Russia (implicitly part of the East) to Europe. But she doesn’t completely belong here or there. Individualism, the importance of an individual, is not as clearly expressed or emphasized in its history as in European civilization. On the other hand – community, collective consciousness has never been absorbed by individuals as completely as in Asian societies. “No wonder then that the first communist state emerged in Russia -” a product of the culture of individuals who proclaim European ideals only to build eastern tyranny. “.

General Aleksander Liebiedź, when asked by Radek Sikorski, whether Russia is a different country in Europe, replied directly that Russia is a different civilization than European civilization. This opinion can be heard more and more often from the lips of many Russian politicians. They begin to understand and express their conviction that, at turning points in history, ad hoc tactical calculations are not enough to make the right political choice for the future. They understand that the most important tendency of social development should be extracted from the history and present of Russia and that it should be helped in its implementation. Today, such a tendency indicated by many philosophers, political scientists, historians of ideas and politicians is “Eurasianism”. What is “Eurasianism”? In its traditional version from the beginning of our century it was a “retreat to Asia, Marian Zdziechowski, Eurasianism is not tantamount to pan-Asianism, as it does not think about the conquest of Asia or the march to Europe at the head of the conquered Asian peoples. Instead of expansion to the outside, he calls for internal consolidation under the slogan of a return to the East. General Liebiedź is now leaning towards this understanding of Eurasianism in his public statements. Marian Zdziechowski, Eurasianism is not tantamount to pan-Asianism, as it does not think about the conquest of Asia or the march to Europe at the head of the conquered Asian peoples. Instead of expansion to the outside, he calls for internal consolidation under the slogan of a return to the East. General Liebiedź is now leaning towards this understanding of Eurasianism in his public statements.

Currently, however, there are many currents of thought in Russia referring to the concept of Eurasia and many different schools of understanding this phenomenon. One of them is the national-Bolshevik option, the main representative of which is Alexander Dugin, a thinker who, after the deaths of Rene Guenon and Julius Evola, was considered the greatest living representative of integral traditionalism. He is the author of many books and the editor-in-chief of the periodical Elements bearing the subtitle Eurasian Review.

Holy Covenant of Objectivism

However, we still face a paradox: how can you be a right-wing Bolshevik or a left-wing nationalist? Dugin believes that the invaluable help in answering this question can be provided by … Karl Popper. In his most important work, Open Society and Its Enemies, he divides societies into two types: “open society” and “non-open society”, or “society of enemies of open society”. Popper’s vision of an “open society”, according to Dugin, is not only rationality, but above all the rejection of all forms of the Absolute as opposed to the individualism of man and his nature. The enemies of “open society” are therefore those who wish to base social life on a certain Absolute. The Absolute puts barriers to unlimited individualism,

When asked what connects nationalism with Bolshevism, Dugin answers with the question: what do Plato, Schelling, Hegel, Marx and Spengler have in common? The answer is given by Popper: they are the enemies of “open society.” Among these enemies – treated as representatives of one category – we also find fascists and Marxists, conservatives and social democrats. enemies of open society “. He writes: “This is not simply one of the ideologies hostile to such a society, but exactly its full, conscious, total and true antithesis. National-Bolshevism is such a worldview that is built on a complete and radical rejection of individualism and its central place, the Absolute, in the name of which individualism is rejected, has the most broad and most general sense. One can risk the claim that national-bolshevism supports any version of the Absolute, for any motivation to reject “open society.”

Dugin abolishes the division into left and right, into materialism and idealism. The main line of dispute runs between individualism (which he equates with subjectivism) and objectivity. No wonder then that he calls the alliance of the enemies of open society he calls the Holy Alliance of Objectivism. He believes that “the philosophy of national-Bolshevism is based on the recognition of the true exclusivity of worldviews built on granting a central place of objectivity, equivalent to the Absolute, and it is irrelevant how this objectivity is understood.” this is how the ideal of the objective order is, according to the editor of Elements, the national-Bolshevik ideology.

From occult sects to revolutionary parties

Dugin points out that today historians, describing the phenomenon of fascism, more and more often refer to the left-wing rather than the right-wing roots of this phenomenon. Therefore, he proposes a similar procedure – he wants to find right-wing inspirations in communism. There is no doubt that Marxism-Leninism was a thoroughly left-wing ideology, nevertheless, according to Dugin, there are certain elements in it that can be attributed to right-wing thought. He describes the complex of these elements as “Bolshevism.” These are mainly the legacy of utopian socialists and the legacy of Hegel. Utopian socialists, whom Marx included among his predecessors, represented a specific mystical messianism, proclaiming the return of the “golden age” in the history of mankind. Most of them came from esoteric societies and occult sects, in which the spirit of mystical rapture, eschatological visions and apocalyptic intuitions reigned. They were terrified by the evil of the world around them, which had lost its sacred dimension and which is ruled by lies, selfishness, crime and lust for money. In their opinion, the Church has degenerated and lost God’s grace (this is a constant theme typical of radical Protestant sects, such as Anabaptists or Russian raskolniks). Only the “perfect” know about the imminent arrival of the new “golden age” and, by their secret rituals and occult activities, bring it closer to its realization. The Church has degenerated and lost God’s grace (this is a constant theme characteristic of radical Protestant sects, such as Anabaptists and Russian raskolniks). Only the “perfect” know about the imminent arrival of the new “golden age” and, by their secret rituals and occult activities, bring it closer to its realization. The Church has degenerated and lost God’s grace (this is a constant theme characteristic of radical Protestant sects, such as Anabaptists and Russian raskolniks). Only the “perfect” know about the imminent arrival of the new “golden age” and, by their secret rituals and occult activities, bring it closer to its realization.

In order not to be groundless: one such person was the socialist Augusta Blanqui, who spent thirty-four years in prisons for his revolutionary activities. In his youth, he was a member of the occult lodge of the Philadelphists. Its name referred to the Apocalypse of St. John, where there is a message to the seven Asian Churches. Most faithful to true Christian teaching was the Sixth Church, in Philadelphia. In his work Eternity by the Stars, Blanqui developed the theory of the multiplicity of worlds. Already in the 4th century, such a theory was warned by the exponent of heresy, St. Athanasius the Great, who in his work Against the Gentiles noted that the multiplicity of worlds means a plurality of gods, “for it is not reasonable that several gods should create one universe, nor that one universe should be created by more than one God for the sake of absurdities,

Over time, utopian socialists turned esoteric societies into revolutionary parties. After leaving occult sects, they began projecting their religious views into social reality. The “golden age” they designed was losing its spiritual specificity and took on political features. There was a rationalization of the eschatological myth, however, according to Dugin, its roots were still immersed in traditionalist thought. There is also a second element in communism, which according to Dugin , cannot be unequivocally attributed to leftist thought, it is Hegel’s dialectic, which was later adopted by Marx. It has little to do with the rationalism of Descartes or Kant, it is rather a traditionalist and eschatological doctrine clothed in a specific terminology. Hegel’s philosophy of history is a new version of traditionalist myth derived from Christian theology. An absolute idea is – a thesis, its rejection in history – an antithesis, and its realization in the Kingdom of Heaven – a synthesis. In the Gnostic version of Hegel the Prussian state becomes the earthly Kingdom of God, the New Jerusalem. Marx applied the same scenario to the sphere of production relations.

The thesis is the primal cave society of communism, the antithesis – capitalism, and the synthesis – the communist world. So communism is the end of history, it is the era of the Holy Spirit. This Gnostic element of Marx’s historiosophy was continued especially by the Russian Bolsheviks. They grew up in an environment steeped in the spirit of national messianism, according to which Moscow – the Third Rome – was called to save the world. Under the concept of Bolshevism, Dugin understands and accepts the above ideas, while in all communist thought he firmly rejects Feuerbach’s philosophy and his evolutionism. According to his own definition, “national-bolshevism is Marx minus Feuerbach.”

Cross, swastika, sickle and hammer

In his own way, he also understands the other limb of his doctrine – nationalism. In his view, it is not racial or ethnic, but cultural and geopolitical. Representatives of other nationalities can belong to the Russian people if they recognize the idea of ​​the Russian state. Russia, unlike the plutocratic West, is supposed to be an ideocratic state. To explore the state idea of ​​Russia, Dugin asks us to refer to angelology. Christian tradition makes it clear that every nation has its heavenly protector, the Guardian Angel. The Book of Daniel states that Archangel Michael was the Guardian Angel of the Chosen People. Dugin goes further in his argument. In his opinion, in traditional societies, the angel played the role of the monarch. After the fall of the dynasty, the angelic incarnation may have a collective character – the angel may incarnate in the order, a social class and even a party. Dugin’s writings show unequivocally that today the Guardian Angel of Russia played the role of the National-Bolshevik Party.

The Editor of Elements takes over part of the Russian messianic tradition to modify it in his own way. According to him, Russia is the Third Rome, the only New Israel in the world, the backbone of true orthodoxy, and it is through it that salvation should come. However, from the 17th century, when the Russian Orthodox Church was split, the messianic idea was split open to this day. From then on, New Israel began to exist under two hypostases: conservative and revolutionary. On the one hand, there was the tsar, the state, and the official church hierarchy; on the other – raskolnicy, Old Believers, sects, revolutionists. Both tainted the spirit of Russian messianism and distorted its letter. The only salvation may be to reunite the broken messianic idea – the unification of the Russian order and the Russian rebellion.

This is the idea that is to lay the foundations of the ideocratic Russian state, which at the end of time is to fight an eschatological battle with the forces of the plutocratic West. According to the “science” called sacred geography, one of the authorities of which is Dugin, the angelic and demonic hierarchies have their respective geopolitical assignments on earth. When the name of the angel who looks after the liberal West is revealed – it sounds about Mammon – we already know whose 7th side it stands Russia. An ally in this fight, as the columnists of Elements constantly emphasize, may be Germany, the only country apart from Russia in which the national-Bolshevik doctrine appeared. The German national-Bolsheviks were definitely pro-Russian. in his book National-Bolshevism he wrote: “If First Rome was Catholic and Second Rome – Protestant, then Third Rome should be Orthodox.” to the West of Catholic Bavaria. At this point it is worth recalling the thought of Feliks Koneczny, who in his monumental work, together with Russia, also included Prussia among the “Byzantine civilization”.

Until now, only two forces have had a chance to defeat “open society”: fascism and communism. Dugin regrets that there was no lasting alliance of these forces (except for the episode of 1939-41), and the supporters of such a solution, i.e. The Bolsheviks remained on the periphery of political life in both communist Russia and Nazi Germany, and he blames materialists and technocrats on both sides of the barricade who rejected the esoteric and mystical elements of their ideologies, thus disarming themselves intellectually and spiritually. Dugin, however, believes in the realization of such an alliance in the future. As an inherent student of Hegel, he foresees the synthesis of these trends in the dialectical triad: Third Rome – Third Reich – Third International. Like another Hegel’s student, Francis Fukuyama, sees the end of history,which, however, will not be liberal democracy, but the National-Bolshevik Kingdom – “perfecting the implementation of the greatest continental and universal Revolution in history.”

The fifth Veda, or left-wing esotericism

The discursive mind is merely a supportive mind and therefore not of decisive importance. The center of gravity of Tradition is not only in the sphere of irrationality, but also of Inhumanity, and it is not about intuitive guesses, premonitions and assumptions, but about the credibility of the experience of a particular kind of initiation. Irrationality, which, according to Popper, is at the center of the doctrines of the enemies of open society, is in fact nothing but the axis of sacredness, the basis of Tradition. “

However, a difficulty arises: while it is easy to imagine an alliance of the radical right (conservatism) with traditionalism, how to reconcile leftist radicalism (revolutionism) with traditionalism? To answer this question, Dugin draws on the works of Evola and Guenon. On the one hand, Evola said a lot about “traditionalist orthodoxy”, and on the other, he considered himself to be an esoteric “left hand path”. Guenon, in turn, in his text The Fifth Veda wrote that in certain cosmic cycles, in the “iron age”, in the era of Kali-Yuga, traditional institutions of spiritual life lose their vitality and then the implementation of a metaphysical plan requires unorthodox ways and methods. That is why he called tantrism ” The Fifth Veda, although, as is known, there are only four Vedas. This argument is entirely in line with the Russian tradition of Eurasian thought. In 1921 in Sofia, a group of émigré “Eurasians” published their manifesto. One of its authors was Piotr Suwczyński, who, in the text Turn to the East, on the one hand cursed the communist revolution, and on the other – he could not hide his pride that it was so terrible and no other nation had given the world a great revolution so far.He noted that the revolution had brought a terrible evil, but that evil would give rise to great new inspirations that would overwhelm the soul of every Russian, regardless of whether he belonged to the persecutors or Commenting on this text, Marian Zdziechowski wrote: “The sight of a man mad with pain and in unconscious ecstasy kissing the hands of an executioner, which causes him this pain,

Traditionalism, which is an important component of national-Bolshevism, is nothing more than “left esotericism”. The irrationalism postulated by Dugin, on the other hand, should be understood not as “irrationalism” but as “active and aggressive destruction of rationalism”.

Forty-five Goebbels and Dzerzhinsky

Dugin’s ideas form the basis of the National-Bolshevik Party program. Here is a fragment of the official document of the party entitled Commandments nacbola (“nacbol” is the shortened name of the national-Bolshevik): “1. Our God is Russia, our Church is the Party; the Party must not be argued; the Party should be believed; it is forbidden to doubt in the victory of the Party; 2. The party above all; parents, wife, children, women – everything after the Party; […] 8. Forget that there are words “I want” – “I don’t want”; leave only one notion – “; […] 11. Decorate your body with party tattoos. ‘ , not paying attention to the correctness or academicity of the style […]. Everyone should become aware of what we want and what we want specifically from you. It is a question about the meaning of life. “

Dugin answers this question on five points. There is no reference to religion, no word on Orthodoxy, no supernatural perspective. The meaning of life, according to Dugin, is completely immersed in mortality: “1. It is necessary to understand the course of history; 2. It is necessary to participate in the course of history; 3. It is necessary to change the course of history; 4. It is necessary to turn history backwards; 5. It is necessary to stop the course of history. “The party leader, writer Eduard Limonov, in the text entitled” We need forty-five Geobbels and Dzerzhinsky “writes about the need to lead the regional branches of the party of strong people:” To begin with, we need forty-five Goebbels, Dzerzhinsky , Molotovs, Strassers, as you please. We need them. Even if you have to give birth to them again, find me forty-five strong leaders of the region. Then we will sweep away all the dirt from the road: both the officials and the enemies of the left and the right. Lenin could, and we can. Hitler could, maybe, and we. “

ESTERA LOBKOWICZ

Holy Letter Fronda No. 11-12 (1998)

By Charles Weisman

As with any script the Bible reveals certain traits, attributes and characteristics of the various actors or characters it talks about. We can thus find in the Bible some attributes and characteristics of Esau-Edom, which will help identify who this actor was in history and perhaps in the world today. There is much evidence showing that the seed of Esau may safely be identified with modern Jewry.

Edom’s Symbolic Name

The first revealing attribute associated with Esau-Edom in Scripture is that of a colour association with his name. Esau-Edom is symbolically associated with the colour red. Esau was actually born with this attribute, as is described in the account of his birth: 

And the first [Esau] came out red, all over like a hairy garment; and they called his name Esau. (Genesis 25:25)

Here we find that Esau had the physical attribute of being red and hairy, which is contrasted with Jacob’s appearance who ”was a plain man” (Gen. 25:27). The red colour of Esau was to be a sign that he would later sell his birthright to Jacob for some red pottage. 

And Esau said to Jacob, Feed me, I pray thee, with that same red pottage; for I am faint: therefore was his name called Edom (Genesis .25:30)

The word ‘Edom’ actually means “red,” just as the name Esau signifies red. This character thus represents the colour red. When we look at the meaning and symbology associated with the colour red in both Scripture and secular history we have a better understanding of the nature and identity of Esau-Edom, and who he is to be identified with. Here are some illustrations: 

• Red is representative of blood and bloodshed (2 Kings 3:22; Isa. 1:15). 
• Scarlet or red is symbolic of sin in general (Isa. 1:18). 
• The red horse of the Book of Revelation signifies war and the ability to cause wars (Rev. 6:4). Esau was to be war-like and live by the sword (Gen. 27:40). 
• The anti-Christian, satanic system which ruled Rome was identified as a red dragon (Rev. 12:3). Jews are the most antichristian people on the face of the earth. 
• The great beast of Mystery Babylon which was to spread abominations and death to the whole earth is scarlet or red in colour. And the woman on the beast controlling it is dressed in scarlet (Rev. 17:3-4). Jews are the major promoters of the Babylonian religion called Judaism. 
• The banking industry, which is a part of red Babylon’s economic control over Christendom, is led by the Jewish banking family of Rothschild, which means “red shield”. 
• The Red Flag symbolizes revolutionary socialism. “The socialist movement, from its inception up to the present day, has been largely dominated by Jewish influence.”
• In the Jewish Cabala red signifies bloodshed and also justice for the Jew.
• The Jewish author and historian Arthur Koestler shows that the Jewish Khazars (from which many Jews are derived) were commonly known as the “Red Jews”.

The colour of Jewish-Communism is red as indicated by such terms as red nation, red star, ‘Red Square’, etc. The Russian Revolution that brought about ‘Red Communism’ was planned and financed by Jews, and “the revolutionary leaders nearly all belonged to the Jewish race.”

Red, in the West, has become a universal sign for warning or danger. Red Edom {Communism) has proven to be a danger to the Christian West.

The colour red is as predominately associated with the Jews and their activities as it is with that of Esau-Edom. Also note that there are no positive or redeeming attributes associated with the colour red in connection to Esau, or in its association to the Jews. Red is always representative of something bad or negative, such as bloodshed, sins, the Babylonian system, war, communism, etc. Esau-Edom and his descendants are possessors of these characteristics. 

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Sept. 14, 2021 Anno Domini

If it weren’t insulting enough that the Trotskyite Bush administration had the audacity to call a Bolshevist piece of legislation the “Patriot Act”, the false-flag regime accepted from a hostile foreign power a perverse gift as a memorial for the 9/11 attacks.

In 2005, crypto-Jew Vladimir Putin gifted the United States of America a hideous teardrop monument—the Tear of Grief—to commemorate victims of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The Dadaist monument, which resembles a human vagina, was created by longtime leading Soviet artist and UNESCO favourite Zurab Tsereteli, a Georgian of possible Jewish descent. It bears the ironic slogan, “To the struggle against world terrorism”. Struggle, of course, is a Marxist descriptor, and modern terrorism itself was born in the Soviet Union under the wave of Red terror. At this year’s memorial at the monument, the Russian national anthem, which is the same as the Soviet anthem, was even played.^[1] Although Putin wasn’t on hand during the official dedication of the monument in New Jersey in 2006, he attended the groundbreaking ceremony in 2005 and delivered an uninspiring speech full of lies and misdirection and disingenuously calling for a need for unity between Russia and America against a common enemy.^[2] At the groundbreaking, Tsereteli explicitly linked the memorial (and thereby 9/11 itself) to global citizenship, echoing what George H.W. Bush expressed on Sept. 11, 1991 when he called for a “New World Order” (really, a New Socialist World Order. “Socialist” was dropped by world planners for obvious reasons).

“It is my hope that this piece and the beautiful park that will surround it will enable people from all over the world to honor the potential that lies in every world citizen to fight evil and foster goodwill,” Tsereteli said.^[3]

At this year’s memorial, Russian ambassador Anatoly Antonov conveyed a similar point (Note that this rhetoric smacks of unipolarism all the while Russia has been working hard to portray itself to Western conservative audiences as multipolar):

“The 9/11 tragedy has shown that terrorism is a common global threat. Any attempts to create isolated ‘islands of security’ in the modern inter-connected world are ephemeral and doomed to failure. The victory over terrorists can be achieved only through joint efforts of the entire international community.”^[4]

Incidentally, Antonov was a specialist in control of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons in the Soviet Ministry of Foreign Affairs and has been under multiple Western sanctions, yet he is allowed to enter the United States, act as a keynote speaker at a national monument, and say these hostile, treasonous things to the American people.

The Soviet-saturated Bush administration was all too willing to accept the gift (more a mockery than a gift) despite the Kremlin’s nearly century-long hatred and subversion of the West, its sponsorship of international and domestic terrorism, and its lies of democratization as a means of undermining the West’s protection mechanisms.

The Tear of Grief is a silver teardrop suspended between a jaggedly hollowed out 100-foot column. It’s supposed to symbolize some kind of solidarity with victims of terror around the world. This notion is such a joke given that Putin has led government-sponsored terrorism both domestically and abroad. Putin’s FSB (formerly named KGB) was caught red-handed (pun intended) setting up the Ryazan apartment bombing false flag in 2000 as a pretext to invade Chechnya (Putin made sure to bring up the Ryazan apartment bombing[false flag] in his 2005 groundbreaking address in New Jersey). The Chechen Republic is a known proving ground for Kremlin-backed Islamic terrorism. Abroad, the Kremlin has sponsored any and all sides of conflicts in nations and regions it wishes to control, mainly through the strategy of Balkanization, like the ongoing Soviet Operation SIG^[5], which supports both sides in the Middle East conflict but never enough support that any one side gains a clear and permanent victory. A recent example of Kremlin Balkanization scheming is in the Azerbaijan/Armenia conflict.^[6]

Given Russia’s history, Putin’s teardrop gift can only serve as a mockery and rubbing of salt in the wound of the American people—all enabled by the American’ people’s own government, which has long been compromised by the international Jewish communist conspiracy. Americans should view the monument for what it likely is—a symbol of Soviet conquest. What makes the monument even more grotesque is its utilitarianism and its resemblance to the human vagina. The occult underworld is obsessed with sex and obsessed erecting monuments that depict sex, especially the phallus.^[7] Since Sovietism is Judaism and Judaism is Kabbalism, is it any wonder Soviet Jews would be interested in this form of art? If the 9/11 monument in America is a giant vagina, is that supposed to mean, then, that Russia, as the dominant power (phallus), has penetrated her? It would seem fitting, given the decades-long Soviet penetration of America’s government and institutions. Russia’s usurpation of America would turn it from a dominant phallic nation, as represented in the masons’ cherished Washington Monument (an obelisk), to the dominated, now represented as a vagina of sorts (Tear of Grief, New Jersey).

It’s unclear whether Tsereteli is Jewish, but it is clear that he is well respected and accepted in the international Jewish community. He has received a Tree of Life award from the Jewish National Fund’s Greater New York Zone^[8] has dedicated several pieces to Jewish causes, including to Holocaust Inc.^[9] The same year Putin was mocking the American people with his vagina piece in New Jersey, Tsereteli had his “Holocaust” work gifted from Russia to Israel. The Kremlin dubbed it, “Russia and Israel should improve co-ordination of their efforts in the fight against terrorism, extremism and ethnic intolerance”.^[10] The event was purported to be the first time a current Russian president had visited Israel, and Tsereteli stood alongside Putin at the event in Jerusalem.

The loyal Soviet artist Tsereteli has been awarded with many state honours, including the “Hero of Socialist Labour, Order of Lenin” in 1990; the “People’s Artist of the USSR” in 1980; and, incidentally, the Order of Akhmad Kadyrov “for his personal contribution to the commemoration of the first president of the Chechen Republic” (Akhmad is the father of current Chechen president, the Putin stooge Ramzan Kadyrov). For decades he has led major Soviet projects, so he is no minor artist in the Soviet bloc. He is known to be close to Putin, which isn’t a surprise considering Putin chose him for the 9/11 memorial, a major international photo op (and mockery of the victim). Another of his sculptures depicts the Yalta conference’s iconic photo of Soviet collaborators Churchill, Roosevelt, and, of course, Josef Stalin. In typical Soviet fashion, the short Stalin’s height was altered to make him appear four inches higher than the two Western presidents.^[11] In looking at some of Tsereteli’s non-Jewish monuments, like his sculpture of Vatican II Pope John Paul II and works for Russian Orthodoxy, it made me think of all the times I have been in an Orthodox Church and seen a Jewish hexagram or all-seeing eye encased in a trinagle. Why are they there when they are not Christian symbols? Has Tsereteli, and artists like him, been subverting sacred Christian art with his Jewish symbology? I have seen these symbols in European Catholic art as well, so perhaps the same would apply in the Catholic Church—conversos and cryptos possibly blaspheming and mocking holy iconography.

Salvador Dali in Mercedes Magazine, April 2004, described Tsereteli as,

“A grand master which unites the talents of both an artist and an organizer. This doubles an energy of Zurab’s works and beginnings.”

In hindsight of the “Covid-19” scamdemic, it seems that 9/11 served as the foundation for final Bolshevist world government expansion into the West, by way of the two precedents it set for unconstitutional changes (brute force, as outlined in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion) via “emergency” powers. So it is that the Soviets and their proxies in the U.S. government sought to leave their mark at or near the crime scene—in this case, across the shore from the World Trade Center in New Jersey. It seems the more we look into the criminal conspiracy surrounding the 9/11 false flag, the more we see Soviet fingerprints. We shall continue to explore the hypothesis that 9/11 was carried out by a joint KGB/Mossad initiative to bring about what we are now finally seeing in 2021—the realization of world communism.

Notes:

1. Executive Intelligence Review, U.S., Russian Officials Express Friendship, Unity Against Terrorism in 9/11 Event at Tear of Grief Monument in New Jersey, Sept. 12, 2021 – https://larouchepub.com/pr/2021/20210912_teardrop_ceremony.html ↑
2. President of Russia Web Portal, Speech at the dedication ceremony for the memorial to the victims of the tragedy of September 11, 2001, September 16, 2005 – http://www.911monument.com/download.cfm?docName=PutinSpeech.pdf ↑
3. The Peninsula at Bayonne Harbor, Teardrop Memorial to be placed at the Peninsula at Bayonne Harbor, March 9, 2005 – https://web.archive.org/web/20120313011703/http://www.bayonnelra.com/press/03092005.pdf ↑
4. Executive Intelligence Review, U.S., Russian Officials Express Friendship, Unity Against Terrorism in 9/11 Event at Tear of Grief Monument in New Jersey, Sept. 12, 2021 – https://larouchepub.com/pr/2021/20210912_teardrop_ceremony.html ↑
5. Operation SIG Index, Fitzpatrick Informer – https://fitzinfo.net/operation-sig/ ↑
6. Dautheir-Villars, David and Simmons, Ann, Putin supplied Armenia with missiles, sold Azerbaijan means to shoot them down, Oct. 3-4, 2020, Wall Street Journal – https://fitzinfo.net/2020/10/07/putin-supplied-armenia-with-missles-sold-azerbaijan-means-to-shoot-them-down/ ↑
7. Marrs, Texe, Baal’s shaft and Cleopatra’s needle, Power of Prophecy, Jan. 20, 2009 – https://www.texemarrs.com/012009/baals_shaft_cleopatras_needle.htm ↑
8. Jewish National Fund Highlights from the Around the Country – http://support.jnf.org/site/PageServer?pagename=BN_Highlights&printer_friendly=1 ↑
9. Holocaust Memorial Sculpture, Moscow, Russia, 1996 – https://www.southerncostablancajewishcommunity.org/20160720memorial_russia.php ↑
10. President of Russia, Russia and Israel should improve coordination of their efforts in the fight against terrorism, extremism and ethnic intolerance, April 28, 2005 – http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/33246 ↑
11. Yeager, Carolyn, Surprise! Huge “Big Three” monument unveiled in Yalta, Crimea, Jan. 5, 2015 – https://carolynyeager.net/surprise-huge-big-three-monument-unveiled-yalta-crimea ↑

By Leonard Young

During the last half of the 19th century, there grew up side by side among the Jews or Khazars of Russia, two rival schools of thought about how to achieve world dominion. There were those who favoured the Communist revolution method in Russia, to be followed by the spread of Communism about the rest of the world and those who favoured the Political Zionist method, i.e. the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine which should rule the world through the medium of Jews at the control of affairs in every nation. The protagonists of the two schools were apt to be in bitter opposition but both produced men of energy who met with remarkably good conditions for furthering their purposes.

Asher Ginzberg became the leader of the fanatically nationalist Zionists. He met with, but overcame opposition from the much more assimilated Jews further west who were divided into the two camps of the Rothschilds and the German-Jews in Germany and America. The German-Jews had invested a large part of their capital in German industry and shared, or pretended to share in the plans of Pan-Germanism.

It was at this time that the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion came to light. They detail in very direct, forceful language the appalling plan of the Jews for obtaining complete mastery over the Gentiles. The remarkable thing is that they have continued to the present day to be carried out with complete fidelity and diabolical efficiency and all our politicians do about it is to vie with one another in currying favour with the international financiers by doing all they can to help them to destroy us. The Protocols should be studied by everyone and it is helpful to read them in conjunction with such books at Waters Flowing Eastward, by L. Fry, and Hidden Government, by Lt.-Col. Creagh Scott, and B. Jensen’s books, listed in the bibliography.

It will be noted that the wars and revolutions of this century have all led steadily to the furthering of the Jewish purposes of Communism and Political Zionism. During the last fifty years this comparative handful of Jews have met with astounding success and have completely transformed the world. Probably the most astonishing thing has been the way in which politicians, particularly the British ones, have hastened to help them destroy western civilisation and Christendom. It only goes to show the astonishing control of affairs the Jews have obtained by means of finance, Freemasonry and control of all the means of publicity.

Strange to say, the only real opposition these Jews have met with has been from individual Jews, probably mainly Sephardim, who have objected to the foul policy and have seen that it must inevitably end in great harm to the Jews, as being contrary to God’s purpose for the return of the Jews to Israel, which they awaited Him to bring about in His own good time.

It has been calculated that no more than 8 per cent. of the Jews now living, and known as Jews, can be descendants of Judah or Israel. Consequently, the great mass of those who have gone to Palestine and evicted the Arabs, with the connivance of the United Nations, have not even got in their support the very feeble argument that they are descendants of the original Israelites. Possibly this explains Revelation i i , 9 and i i i , 9.

The writer is in no way “Anti-Semitic”, whatever is meant by that term. Neither is he “Anti-Jew”. He is only opposed to the vile circle of power-lusting men who are working for the creation of an Anti-Christian World Government. This Sanhedrin, which has existed throughout the ages, has become remarkably cunning in subverting and using leading Gentiles to serve its purposes and it is quite happy to allow them to enjoy great wealth and power so long as they toe the line. Foul and atheistic Gentiles have been leading lights in the development of Masonry and other secret societies. International Finance is not entirely composed of Jews. In these days, the majority of the Gentiles who rise to high position, particularly in the English-speaking world, do so because they are considered suitable by the Sanhedrin and they are soon removed if they show any signs of getting awkward from the Sanhedrin point of view.

While it is ridiculous to suppose that all the Jews in the world spend their time plotting world wars, etc., it is probable that most of them are tools of the Sanhedrin to a greater or lesser extent. And the Sanhedrin would be quite callous and unscrupulous in using them as might be expedient. For example, a large number of the Jews, or rather Khazars, who entered Palestine after the war were almost certainly driven there by fear of the Sanhedrin.

The basic purpose of the Sanhedrin being to destroy the Christian faith and set up an atheistic world order, it obviously includes the pollution, perversion and destruction of any truly religious elements in Jewry which might therefore in time turn to the Christian faith and also, probably, the destruction of Nordic- type Jews along with the other Nordic peoples, as it is in the remnant of the Nordic descendants of Shem via Abraham and Israel that the earthly part of God’s purpose in Christ is to be worked out, assuming that it is correct that the Israelites were originally Nordic.

The stupendous development of recent generations is well covered by a study of the books by Frances E. Newton, C. H. Douglas, A. K. Chesterton, B. Jensen, Douglas Reed, Colin Jordan, etc., mentioned in the bibliography at the end.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
July 30, 2021 Anno Domini

World Jewish Congress founder Nahum Goldmann suggested in a German periodical that both the Soviet Union and the United States of America work in Israel’s interests, echoing a warning by an Israeli defector some years later.

“…both the United States and the Russians would be prepared to guarantee Israel’s safety and to send troops in her defence,” the Russian-born Zionist Goldmann was paraphrased as saying in the May, 1978 edition of the Association of Jewish Refugees in Great Britain.

The comments originated from an interview in Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung, a German daily published in Osnabrück. Although the United States and the Soviets were bitter enemies at the time, Goldmann seems to have believed that Israel was a unifier between the two nations.

Goldmann’s admission corroborates Israeli defector Jack Bernstein’s claim in his 1984 book The Life of An American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel that there was a Jewish-Soviet-orchestrated “New York-Moscow-Tel Aviv Triangle” guiding world affairs.

“The Zionist power over the U.S. Government in Washington, D.C. stems from the Zionist/Bolsheviks centered in New York City,” Bernstein wrote. “This power of the Zionist/Bolshevik Jews over the U.S. makes the New York leg of the New York/Moscow/Tel Aviv Triangle a tremendous influence over communist policies,” he goes on to say.

Incidentally, the Nazis once accused Goldmann of being a secret communist agent. What’s more, Goldmann spoke with Yugoslav communist dictator Josip Broz Tito on Middle East peace and was mourned by KGB operative Yasser Arafat of the Palestinian Liberation Organization.

“The Palestinians mourn the death of Nahum Goldmann. He was a Jewish statesman of a unique personality. He fought for justice and legitimate rights for all peoples,” Arafat lamented.

Tito told a meeting of Soviet bloc leaders in Moscow in 1967,

“I would like to inform you about the Jews. [Nahum] Goldmann from the World Jewish Congress asked me to receive him. It was a month ago. He asked me: what do you think, do you want to somehow solve this problem? I explained to him our position….”

Clearly, Goldmann himself was high up in this Soviet New York-Moscow-Tel Aviv triangle and let slip a hint of who is really in control. It’s also likely that Goldmann would have been involved in the planning of the joint Soviet-Israel Operation SIG, which is a clever ploy designed to frame the United States and Great Britian for global Jewish criminal activity. Operation SIG seems to be mounting its fulfillment, with the last legs of Western Civilization being kicked out from under us before our very eyes.

By Vasya Belozerova
August 13, 2019 Anno Domini
Translated from the Russian
Vasilisa1210.ru

Russian President Vladimir Putin – half-Jewish by nationality on the mother’s side – such sensational data were published by a number of domestic and foreign media outlets. In support of this fact, the publication cites a document – an application for the issuance of a new passport of the citizen of Russia Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, dated December 30, 2000, which indicates the nationality of the parents. According to official data, the father of the current president, Putin, Vladimir Spiridonovich, is Russian by nationality, and the mother of the head of state, Maria Ivanovna Shelomov, is listed as Jewish (Евр.).

Putin at the age of 6 with his mother Maria Ivanovna Shelomova in 1958:

Of course, these personal facts from the biography of the country’s first person will remain secret, given that President Shelomov’s mother Maria Ivanovna died in 1998, and Putin’s father Vladimir Spiridonovich died in 1999. Nevertheless, as you know, the historical origin of the surname Shelomov comes from the Jewish male name Shlomo (in Russian Salomon). The end of the surname in -ov means belonging – that is, Shelomov is translated as the son of Solomon. And as we all know, Solomon (Shlomo) was the most revered Jewish king, who was considered the wisest of all people and who rebuilt the Second Temple. Another small detail – according to Jewish laws, a Jew is considered one who is born of a mother – Jewish by nationality and nothing else.

Let’s see the “personal card” of Mordkho Abelevich, who was registered at the Vitebsk Investigation Department. Such “personal files” were brought up to members of the “Bund” who participated in the 9th conference of the General Jewish Workers’ Union in 1912.

There are still no official documents confirming the relationship of Vladimir Vladimirovich with Blinchikov, but the face itself is present. The notorious Jewish factor. As one of our journalists said, if you look closely, you can see “Jewish ears” behind all the global events taking place in the world.

Jewish roots of Vladimir Putin

The magazine “Profile” puts forward the following version of the origin of the Putin family. According to pre-war photographs that accidentally ended up in the magazine, Putin’s family tree was restored to Putin’s grandmother and grandfather. According to this information, Putin’s grandmother married a second time to Vladimir Dmitrievich Pechersky in 1960. According to the recollections of his second wife Anna Pecherskaya, Putin’s grandmother was an accountant either at school or in the village council, and her future husband Pechersky was the son of a parish priest in Chufalovo, Yaroslavl region. Pecherskaya does not give her real name, but, like her husband, calls her Lyalya. “Lyalya was pretty, a real angel” with noble urban manners and was noticeably different from the village girls.

Putin’s great-grandfather served as a traveling salesman and sold Singer sewing machines. Putin’s great-grandmother was a certified midwife who graduated from medical school and had the right to private practice, but her daughter Lyalya did not have a higher education. Lyalya studied financial courses and graduated from school immediately after the revolution. The first husband of Putin’s grandmother left her with a child, disappointed in love. “Profile”, although it does not draw historical parallels, writes that the real name of Lyalya was Rasputin, and after the change of dignity, the secular name was changed. Later, “so that the ministers of the monastery did not have bad associations, her husband entered the monastery book as Putin.” From Chufalov, Yaroslavl region, where Putin’s grandmother married her second husband, she moved with him to Kokand, then to Fergana, then to Rostov the Great. But, tired of eternal travel, she left Pechersky and married the Jew Epstein (he took his wife’s surname), who adopted Vova Putin, Putin’s father. Thus, Vladimir Putin is a Jew by his grandfather. Yes, and not even native. Although Epstein.

The electronic newspaper Petersburg News wrote that,

“Putin has already said that Jews have long aroused sympathy in him, and he recalls with joy how he grew up in a communal apartment in Baskov Lane among Jewish neighbors, the sweetest and most pleasant people.”

It is quite possible that these were not neighbors, but relatives. Jewishness was not a fact that they liked to advertise. Naturally, Little Johnny Putin tried to forget about his Jewish roots.

Putin’s presence at the opening of the Center for Jewish Culture and his congratulations on Rosh Hashanah added fuel to the fire of supporters of the “Jewish version” of the president’s origin. Putin himself has kept a guerrilla silence, not commenting on these assumptions. A number of journalists have long noted President Putin’s markedly respectful relationship with representatives of the Jewish community, the official events of which in Moscow the head of state visits repeatedly. Moreover, as you know, Vladimir Putin has always tried to build trusting relationships with the political leaders of Israel and in almost every public speech to call the Jews of Israel a fraternal people. In particular, in fact, with the coming to power of Putin in 1999, Russia’s policy towards Israel has sharply changed from a negative side to a positive one. Although many decades before that, Israel was several times on the verge of clashes with the USSR, which all these years actively supported the Arab countries and regimes surrounding Israel politically and with the supply of weapons.

By Avigdor Eskin
From Breakthrough into Eurasianism
November 13, 2020 Anno Domini
Translated from the Russian

Excerpt:

The conditions for Israel’s survival are the replacement of the liberal diktat with a Eurasian ideocracy with an authentic Jewish filling.

The departure from the political scene of liberal democracy following fascism and communism for many now seems inevitable. Even the renowned ideologue of Americanism, Samuel Huntington, expects substantial resistance to American hegemony. I believe that the mission to be the vanguard of such resistance rests with Israel and Russia.

It is difficult to imagine a more important and noble task in our day. Let’s take Solzhenitsyn’s “Letter to the Leaders” and rewrite it by analyzing the collapse of liberal democracy, not liberalism that has already vanished. You will see how powerful such a Eurasian manifesto will be. It should be put on the table for the rulers of Russia and Israel at the same time.

The messianic passionarity emanating from Zion should capture the majority of Russian Jews and “shake” the liberal foundations of Jewish life in the United States. At the same time, the factor of culturally isolated Jewish traditionalists living in America will inevitably affect. These people will turn to Israel in a moment of trial, even at the cost of a conflict with their country of residence. The continental imperial orientation of Russia, instead of assimilation, will offer Russian Jews an orientation toward Israel.

The ideology of Eurasianism will allow representatives of all traditions to assert themselves without humiliating compromises, inviting them to realize themselves within the territories historically occupied by them.

This concept fully integrates the messianism of the Zionist movement as an antipode to the assimilation of the “great confusion” (“Erev Rav”). The authentic Jewish idea of ​​”light to the nations” is not in wandering for the sake of gaining influence in a foreign land, but in connection with the piece of the continent, given by the Creator—the Land of Israel. It is reflected in the words of the Jewish prophets, in the laws of the Talmud and in the writings of the saints of Israel of all times. Moving around the planet according to the Atlanticist model is a punishment, but not an ideal. Since the era of exile has ended, there is no more room for even a discussion on this issue.

Zionocentrism automatically solves all the painful problems of the Russian-Jewish symbiosis. For constructive interaction, it is also necessary to develop a new joint geopolitical strategy based on soil tendencies among both peoples.

This is a hitherto unknown innovation. It would not have come true today if it were not for the ground under the feet of each of the sides. There is also a common Wahhabis of the same type in Chechnya and Hamas in the Middle East. And most importantly, the “new world order” destroying any originality ….

The will of the Israelis in the elections is a challenge for Putin’s Russia not to miss the chance to knock Israel out of the chains of the liberal-democratic international. If the Kremlin intends to become an international player again, then it has been given a chance not to lag behind Washington, enforcing a “peace process”, but guided by its own interests, relying on the forces of resistance to mondialism in Israel. And we should start with an active dialogue with a million Russian-speaking Israelis, most of whom, in accordance with existing legislation, are citizens of Russia.

The new wave from Israel will immediately have an impact on the Jews in Russia. After Gusinsky leaves, there will be no more active and influential opponents of the new strategy. In turn, the Bush administration’s dislike of Israel can play a positive role here.

All facts and undercurrents lead us to the idea of ​​the inevitability of the proposed turn. We are hindered only by numbness – a consequence of cowardice – the habit of “going with the flow” and being burdened with a feeling of hopelessness in the face of the etheric giant. Time to show will and become the creator of history, and not its passive subject.

Time is working against us as long as we are in hesitation and indecision. But now we have a great task ahead of us. And who knows – perhaps for the sake of this great hour the Creator of the universe brought Russians and Jews together from the beginning of the century, so that together we would write a new page in the history of the victory of the human race over the serpent pursuing it? ..

2000 year