By Ryan Augustine
February 23, 2025 Anno Domini

The Alt-right grift known as MAGA is doomed to fail. The movement will achieve none of its platform goals. This falls squarely on the bulk of the people which make up the movement for not empowering themselves politically and instead trusting the plan.

For any political movement to be successful it must have sufficient power to achieve its goals, the movement must have the means to effect the change it seeks.

As a case study, we can look at the Jews and see how they gained political dominance. The Jewish people used debt-based finance and, aided by Satan and his minions, they parlayed the profit from usury to establish secret societies, criminal networks, and influence over the rulers of Europe. When the economies modernized out of feudalism and into the modern era, the Jews pounced on opportunities to seize control over key industries like banking, printing, movies, and television, which allowed them to control the public discourse and change the national culture to entrench themselves in a dominant position while democracies were replacing the old order. It’s not hard to see that there is a casual relationship between political power and ownership of the mechanisms which can be used to effect change.

For instance, when the Jewish nation wishes to pursue one of its political goals: mass immigration it is able to leverage it’s control over the industries and relationships it owns to effect the change in immigration policy it seeks. They have used their control over television and movies to eliminate all white racism, the natural defense against immigration. Banks and financial institutions, along with a media campaign, have pressured politicians to pass generous welfare bills which enable mass migration. Hedge funds set the boards of directors for all major U.S. corporations with pro-immigrant stooges. Left-wing foundations and “charities” sue any one business or organization that acts to oppose immigration, etc.

This is perhaps the prime reason we can know from all the retarded conspiracy  theories that the Jewish question is real, because there is a direct traceable link between Jewish power and their control mechanisms (as compared to the Jesuits who supposedly run the world because they have a few high schools or whatever).

What can be learned from our enemies here is that politics is not simply wishful thinking; it’s not emoting really hard at something. For politics to be successful, a lot of hard work and dedication has to be put in at a level where real power, or more precisely where power comes from, can be attained. Voting hard doesn’t mean anything.

This is why MAGA is doomed to fail. Maga will fail because MAGA doesn’t own anything and there is no mechanism by which the Maga movement can influence the direction the leaders of the movement take it. There is no mechanism through which the Maga rank and file can hold accountable the likes of Trump, Vance, or whoever pulls their strings.

Although MAGA is billed as a populist movement, it is in fact the opposite: a highly top-down tightly controlled foreign/financial marriage of an operation. If we had to pick two planks of the MAGA platform, they would be reducing the power of immigrants and checking the power of the “deep state/globalist/whathaveyou” elite. The facts are that Trump is a billionaire married to an immigrant, his vice president the Manchurian neckbeard Vance is married to an immigrant, his purse-man fixer Elon Musk is allegedly the worlds richest man and an immigrant, and his administration is full of obscenely wealthy, gay, weird, Indian people, and there is a lot of overlap.

The Information economy which comprises MAGA is highly regulated and flows through international globalist (in the true sense of the word) corporations owned by billionaires. Telegram is owned by a gay new-age billionaire Peter Theil and Twitter (now X) is owned by Satanist immigrant billionaire Elon Musk. The vast majority of influential accounts which disseminate information and talking points to the MAGA rank and file are either gay, foreign, or brown. And if, by chance, you can find one that doesn’t fall into that Venn diagram, it’s likely Jewish. This is why the MAGA movement has essentially adopted all the planks of Communism under the “based” adjective.  It is because the people who make up MAGA have no agency in their own movement and are led around by their disordered feeling by the most sophisticated psychological operation money can buy and science can create. This is why if one were to make a power diagram of the MAGA movement, it would look very similar to the Illuminati power pyramid.

How did things ever get so bad? The short answer is because MAGA is a degenerate and lazy movement. It shares a lot of similarities with the evangelical movement, where feeling really hard about something substitutes hard work. MAGA has never wanted to put the work that it takes to build up a power base; instead, they have simply gone rabid in their support for Trump as if “owning the libs” could ever effect real change. It’s similar to how some football fans like to get drunk, put on costumes, and yell really loudly thinking they are helping their team score touchdowns, and when the game ends they tell themselves: “WE won.” Losers. It is very similar to the whole faith alone vs. works debate in Christian circles. I’ve never really understood this because if you have the faith, you do the works. If you won’t work for something you believe in, then how much did you really believe in it? How many in MAGA actually work to make America great? Or do they all use faith in Trump as their surrogate? It speaks for itself.

If the MAGA movement wants to win, it needs to take immediate actionable steps. There is a lot of low hanging fruit as our enemies have become fat and complacent in their overlordship of us. For example, their main weapon is the dominance they have over American culture through movies, television, and music. However there has not been a good album produced in the Last 30 years—all music is literally the same as sticking a fork down your garbage disposal, turning it on, and listening. Similarly, there hasn’t been a good movie produced in who knows how long. A movie would be even easier to do than an album. We have 3,000 years of books and plays from which to draw. All the scripts are already written. You don’t even need that big of a budget if you hire theater actors and don’t go crazy on CGI. Put it on Odyssey for free and you have a tax write-off for all these MAGA billionaires, millionaires; even Alex Jones’s Infowars network could do it if they spent only 10 per cent of their marketing budget for boner pills.

In order for MAGA to be a successful counter revolution and to really return America to greatness, it must counter our current culture with something. Cheerleading for the president will not cut it because a successful political movement can never be a passive thing. If MAGA wants to succeed it must leverage the vast energy it’s followers possess towards building the institutions through which it can use its energy towards acquiring power. MAGA must provide real challenges to the current political power structure, such as producing good movies. A good movie which puts forth real conservatism as winning will have an effect that cannot be overstated. But MAGA won’t do that because that would be winning.

“Dictatorship can be established only by a victory of socialism in different countries or groups of countries, after which there would be federal unions of the various groupings of these socialist countries, and the third stage would be an amalgamation of these regional federal unions into a world union of socialist nations.”

—Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin

By Charlotte Iserbyt
February 27, 2007 Anno Domini

There is one common thread running through all articles and speeches by elected officials, well-known writers, and commentators in opposition to the merging of the United States into a political and economic regional arrangement known as the North American Union. To my knowledge, not one of them has chosen to use the “C” word (Communism) when warning Americans of the dangers of this unconstitutional merger about to be foisted upon us without proper hearings in Congress. Excellent speeches and articles are being given and written warning us of all sorts of bad things related to this merger, including the fact that we will lose our sovereignty, but we are not being told that all these bad things are necessary for the full implementation of The North American Soviet Union (communistic/regional system). Isn’t the “C” word the one and only word which might shock Americans out of their state of conditioned apathy, thereby bringing about citizen activism which might result in killing this “regional” monster?

Morris Zeitlin, a communist writer for the Communist Party�s Daily World said in an article entitled Planning is Socialism Trademark, November 8, 1975:”We (USA) have no regional government and no comprehensive regional planning to speak of. Regional government and planning remain concepts our urban scholars and planners have long advocated in vain. In socialist countries, metropolitan regions enjoy metropolitan regional government and comprehensive planning. The economic and functional efficiencies and the social benefits that comprehensive national, regional and city planning make possible in socialist society explain the Soviet Union’s enormous and rapid economic social progress.”

Of interest regarding Zeitlin’s comment about “the Soviet Union’s enormous and rapid economic social progress” is the following admission made by former President Gorbachev at the 2005 National School Board Association conference that “half the world’s population and two-thirds of Russians lives in poverty.”

The United States Government, at all levels, has since 1975 accepted wholeheartedly Zeitlin’s advice, to the extent that our country is, believe it or not, almost 100 percent socialist in its political, economic, social, and environmental (sustainable development) policies. For documentation please read Walks Like a Duck, Talks Like a Duck.

The regionalization (consolidation) of the world is quite similar to the three-stage plan outlined by Stalin at the 1936 Communist International. At that meeting, the official program proclaimed:

“Dictatorship can be established only by a victory of socialism in different countries or groups of countries, after which there would be federal unions of the various groupings of these socialist countries, and the third stage would be an amalgamation of these regional federal unions into a world union of socialist nations.” (Ed note: The third stage is taking place right now as we in the United States of America become part of a federal union, the North American Union, which will in the near future become part of a world union of socialist nations.)

Former President of the Soviet Union Gorbachev on March 23, 2000, in London, referred to the European Union (EU) as “the New European Soviet.” If he refers to the E.U. in that way, it only stands to reason that he would refer to the North American Union (NAU) as the “New American Soviet,” since the NAU is modeled on the E.U. Gorbachev also said in his speech to the Soviet Central Committee on November 2, 1987, published by Novosti Press Agency Publishing House:

“We are moving toward a new world, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.”—Gorbachev

How is it possible that if American citizens or United States officials involved in putting us under the North American Union were aware of Gorbachev’s statements, they would not be very concerned regarding our nation becoming part of a Communist world? Have we forgotten the many hundreds of millions of innocent people tortured, starved, murdered, and incarcerated by Communist regimes around the world? Authorities say “over 20 million people suffered in purges under Vladimir Lenin and Josef Stalin — and that more than 10 million died before Stalin’s death in 1953. Some put the number even higher.” [Read]

Do we really believe the Communists have changed or gone away?

United States government officials, elected and unelected, with enormous financial assistance from the tax-exempt foundations, have for many years been working to implement unconstitutional regional planning at the local, state, national and international level, all of this required for full implementation of a One World Socialist Government. For the 3000-page transcript of 1953 Congressional (Reece and Cox Committee) Hearings to Investigate the Tax-Exempt Foundations and for superb research on the history of regional government, go to americandeception.com and type the following into its search engine: Reece Committee, Don Bell Reports, Maureen Heaton, the Mantooth Report, and The Emerging North American Union.

One very important government official in the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations, Under Secretary of State George W. Ball, spelled out very clearly what the Insiders were planning for our nation in The New York Times, 1/24/88: “If we could internationalize by using the United Nations in conjunction with the Soviet Union, because we now no longer have to fear in most cases a Soviet veto, then we could begin to transform the shape of the world and might get the U.N. back doing something useful. Sooner or later we’re going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that they’re not confined merely to the nation states. Start first on a regional, and ultimately you can move to a world, basis.” (emphasis added).

Has our education system so successfully conditioned and dumbed down Americans that they no longer are able to apply logic to the above quotes? Are they no longer capable of transferring that knowledge, processing it into new knowledge and conclusions which might help them understand and oppose the present destruction of our Constitutional Republic?

Since all regional groupings being set up around the world are based on the communistic Free Trade “redistribute the wealth” philosophy, why is it that the adjective “Communist” is never used when discussing GATT, NAFTA, CAFTA and the NAU? Those patriotic writers could at least describe those agreements as “Communism LITE,” couldn’t they?

For those Americans who recall the days of elected officials, not unelected, appointed task forces and “councils” (Soviets, according to most dictionaries), running our towns, schools, counties, states, nation, and world, recognizing this change in our form of government should not be too difficult.

However, for those younger Americans denied an education in American history and government due to the activities of the tax-exempt foundations, especially the Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie Foundations, the loss of elected officials through regionalism does not seem to bother them. Go to americandeception.com and type into search engine “Kenny Hignite” and you will see a most astonishing six-page 1954 “Test on the United States Constitution”, on which Hignite received a grade of 99 “Excellent!” There is absolutely no way that Kenny Hignite, now 66 years old, having received such an excellent education on the U.S. Constitution in a public school in Central California in 1954, would not be questioning the present deliberate destruction of our representative form of government through the implementation of Communistic regional government!

Those Americans under fifty years old, and too often those over 50 years old (!), will ask you “What’s wrong with members of the community or faceless state bureaucrats being appointed to assist our elected officials in their work which has become increasingly complicated?” The simple answer is, “if you don’t approve of what those unelected officials are doing, you can’t get rid of them at the polls.”

Uneducated Americans will also ask you:

“What’s wrong with consolidation of school districts, services, the merging of individual school and town budgets to “save taxpayers money?” (Ed note: In Maine our Senate Education Committee is about to approve Governor Baldacci’s proposal to slash school districts by proposing 26 regional school units statewide with 26 superintendents, compared to the existing 152 superintendents and 290 school units!);

“What’s wrong with merging 16 towns under one county council as was recently proposed in Cumberland County, Maine, thereby eliminating representative government?”

“What’s wrong with getting rid of local school boards and having our schools run by city Mayors, or contracting education out to private organizations connected with the corporations?”

“What possible objection could you have to public school morals and values education even if those programs are forbidden to teach “absolute” morals and values based on the Ten Commandments?”

“What’s wrong with publicly-funded charter schools which have no elected school boards?”

“What’s wrong with Cuban-style school-to-work job training replacing a K-12 liberal arts curriculum? Even if my child can’t read, I sure want him/her to be able to get a job.”

“What’s wrong with public/private partnerships?”

“What’s wrong with the federal government mandating mental health screening for my child?”

“What’s wrong with members of the community assisting the local police in monitoring citizen activities and/or the police handing out awards to citizens who do good deeds, as is the case with the Community-Oriented Policing System (COPS) in Maine?”

What’s wrong with putting the U.N.’s lifelong learning agenda, all community services (birth through death), under the umbrella of the school district? (Go to americandeception.comand type “Feld” into search engine for a remarkable research paper on the history of Community Education)

“What’s wrong with a National I.D. card reportedly designed by two Russian ex-KGB Chiefs?”

“What’s wrong with students being required to perform community service in order to graduate?”

“What’s wrong with federal funding of religious organizations (faith-based initiative)?”

“What’s wrong with federally-funded school choice proposals?”

“What’s wrong with dropping borders between states?” as is in the offing.

And, the subject of this article: “What’s wrong with regional government?” And many more, “What’s Wrong With?”questions from good Americans who have, over many years, through no fault of their own, been deliberately dumbed down and didn’t receive the public education which required the likes of Kenny Hignite to know their Constitution and form of government.

How many Americans realize that almost all the programs mentioned in the above “What’s Wrong With”section have already been implemented in our schools, communities, and states and that they are based on communist/socialist collectivist philosophy? The planners are waiting only for the full implementation of the North American Union (final nail in coffin) which will allow them to write and approve, as was done in Europe, the North American Union’s Constitution (Communist Manifesto) which will include all the above “What’s Wrong With?” programs. That will be the infamous day when the U.S. Constitution is formally relegated to history’s trash bin. And, as with the EU Constitution, or the Communist Manifesto, the practice of Christianity will be outlawed a thing of the past. All religions will be considered equal and inevitably superior to Christianity. Go to americandeception.com and type into search engine “Religion and Governance” an important position paper by Harlan Cleveland, notorious supporter of global government, long-time member of the internationalist Aspen Institute, and first U.S. Ambassador to the Common Market (1960), and Marc Luycx, a Belgian change agent bureaucrat. This paper was prepared by the Foreward Study Group of the European Commission and was undoubtedly used by those drafting the EU Constitution. It will give you a picture of the non-role of Christianity in world region constitutions.

Our elected officials in Congress, who have sworn to uphold the Constitution, should not be immune to multi-million dollar lawsuits for injuries sustained by the citizens of this country. Is not the loss of our freedoms due to elected officials� malpractice (lying to us in regard to putting us under the communistic regional North American Union and not holding hearings on the subject) even more important than the death of one patient due to a doctor�s malpractice, the scalding of a woman who spilled her �too-hot� coffee at a McDonald�s takeout, or the death from cancer of a woman who smoked too many cigarettes? How can we ignore the fact that 651,008 Americans have died in battle to protect and defend the constitutional freedoms which will vanish under this new international regional arrangement? Is there really no penalty to be exacted of these highly-paid Congressional traitors other than voting them out of office, which it seems is impossible to do due to both political parties having the same agenda, controlled media, manipulated political conventions, and election fraud?

Americans have been conditioned to NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, since the days of McCarthyism and the phony fall of communism, mention the “C” word. The word must, as George Orwell might have said, be removed from the dictionaries of all languages, especially English. Otherwise, we might wise up and tackle this treason with all our might and brains since we surely don’t want our children and grandchildren living under any “ism” form of government, much less”Communism”. The Insiders know that “Communism” is the one and only word that must be banished from use. They are not concerned over excellent anti-North American Union rantings and ravings as long as the “C” word is NOT used.

The Insiders, most if not all of whom are corporate communists, have no fear of the coming totalitarian system since they have been assured they will be sitting in the catbird seat, having eliminated all economic competition and self-government (elected officials), and will have the world as their playground. The majority of the world’s population, the Insiders’ human resources, will be their highly trained and conditioned serfs, lifelong.

One might ask, how can this be? It is a well-known and documented fact that Wall Street funded the Bolshevik Revolution and the corporate Communists and our government have been supporting the Communist regime in Russia since 1917. Extensive exchange agreements covering political, municipal, cultural, economic, legal, law enforcement, education, science, sports, medicine, etc. have been signed since 1958 between the USSR and the USA, including of special importance the 1985 education agreements signed by Presidents Reagan and Gorbachev which merged our two education systems and caused to be implemented the Soviet polytechnical work force/job quota system and the Pavlovian outcomes-based method of conditioning/training. Go to americandeception.comfor full text of “Agreement between U.S.A. and USSR”.

Regionalism is communism no matter how you slice it. The sooner Americans get that unpleasant fact permanently entered into their brains, and process that information into appropriate action, the sooner we will be able to escape what Orwell described so well in his novel 1984:

“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on the human face–forever…and remember, that is forever.”

Forward this article to your friends and to your elected officials at the local, state, and national level. Of equal importance restore the “C” word to your vocabulary and use it often.

2007 Charlotte T. Iserbyt – All Rights Reserved

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

Irish capitalists are to blame. Capitalism brings in a foreign workforce to replace Irish workers to drive down wages and working conditions to profit the rich. Capitalism is the enemy of the Irish working class.—ML

The argument that unfettered immigration to capitalist lands is fueled by untamed growth of capital does not stand up to scrutiny.

Count on anti-capitalists to grasp at anything in an attempt to discredit capitalism and aid the Sovietization of the world. They are trying to appeal to conservatives and those opposed to the mongrelization of Western nations by blaming capitalism. We can infer, then, that some non-capitalist system must be the solution, namely some form of socialism/collectivism. This proposition becomes all the more appealing when said conservatives are strategically oriented to perceive Communist countries like China and Russia as being racially homogeneous (which is not true, except for China, because no one wants to live there). There is a co-ordinated propaganda campaign online to portray Soviet Bloc countries, especially Russia, as white, Christian ethnostates. This is Soviet propaganda aimed at Western conservatives.

Prior to the 1960s, the decade in which the Kalergi Plan (deliberate unfettered third world migration to white lands) was set up in all Western nations as policy by our treasonous Judeo-Bolshevik-compromised governments, capital grew without the need for immigration from the third world. It was only after that mainly corporations began to exploit the new government policy of unfettered third world immigration for cheap labour, which does displace local workers. But this would not have been possible without a change in government policy. The general misconception here is that business growth somehow necessitates immigration, when in actuality population growth is what necessitates more business (see The self-perpetuating nature of unfettered immigration).

Previous to the ’60s, Western business had to grow within the confines of a mainly restrictionist immigration policy. In order to grow, workers had to be hired locally, and if none were available, they could be sought from out of state/province/county. This did not mean, however, that product exports or services were limited, but labour was limited to one’s own country. Behind the scenes during this time, a predominantly European stock was being brought in via immigration. Immigration was restricted to white Europeans so as not to disrupt the ethnic, social, and economic cohesion of Western nations. This was an ongoing colonization process that was beneficial to everyone (see The case for colonialism). Population came first, then more business resulted—not the other way around.

One unintended but beneficial outcome of labour shortages, when they did occur, was innovation. Companies that couldn’t grow as much or as fast as they desired due to labour shortages were forced to find ways to grow without the need for, or with less, labour. This usually required technological or methodical innovation (Henry Ford’s assembly line, for example, which was both technological and methodical advancement). Eventually, they could innovate enough to continue their growth. Regardless, government restrictionist policy kept everything in order. Everyone could still profit, regardless of the speed of their growth. The desire for healthy profits keeps things functioning as efficiently as they can—that is the beauty of capitalism. However, companies don’t need to continually grow in order to profit, unless their expenditures become unbalanced. Again, this is where innovation comes in and reigns in disproportionate balance sheets.