By Yaroslav Lisovolik
April 15, 2022 Anno Domini
Translated from Russian

In the context of an unprecedented growth of geopolitical risks in the world, there is a growing awareness that the old architecture of the world order is being replaced by a new configuration of international relations and regional blocs. One of the most important driving forces of this kind of transformation of the world economy is the countries of the global South, which create their own institutions, regional integration associations and financial settlement systems. Among the leaders of these processes are the largest emerging markets, primarily the BRICS countries. So, in March 2022, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said:

“The BRICS countries, which make up almost half of the world’s population and a significant part of world GDP, will be one of the backbones of the new emerging world order.”

In order for BRICS to become the basis for a new world order, this bloc must offer other countries of the world economy new paradigms for the development of a global scale. Such areas in the new world economic architecture may include the restart of globalization based on a new platform of countries and regions, the creation of a new institutional system for the modernization of the countries of the world economy, the creation of a new pool of reserve currencies from emerging markets, the creation of an alternative track to the Western format for the development of the world economy, the creation new regional blocs and platforms for their coordination and development.

Almost all of these possible paradigms of a global scale can be implemented within the broad BRICS+ format, which opens up various options for the BRICS countries to interact with the rest of the world economy. The BRICS+ format, initiated by China in 2017, still has to get its tangible contours of development in many respects, although some possible models for cooperation within its framework have already been announced by representatives of the BRICS countries. China’s BRICS Presidency in 2022 creates a favorable basis for the development of the BRICS+ format, while Chinese representatives have already stated that they are considering the development of the BRICS+ concept in the context of interaction, including regional integration associations of the countries of the global South.

From the point of view of practical implementation, one of the most accessible formats for BRICS+ is the union of three all-continental regional associations, including the African Union, CELAC (an association of Latin American countries), and the SCO/SCO+ in Eurasia. This kind of alliance provides maximum coverage for the countries of the global South, which does not require deep and complex economic integration or harmonization of economic interaction formats on all three continents. The expanded format provides an opportunity to coordinate interaction for developing countries in the international arena in the field of promoting the priorities of the global South agenda in the field of sustainable development.

This year, relatively favorable conditions are emerging for the formation of such an expanded circle of interaction between developing countries: in Latin America, within the framework of the CELAC association, Argentina presides, which has recently stepped up steps to establish interaction with BRICS. The suspension of Brazil’s participation in CELAC in 2020 seems to be a deterrent in the Latin American direction, but this factor is likely to be temporary. The SCO in 2022 is chaired by Uzbekistan, a country that is actively involved in the integration processes in Eurasia after a period of closedness. Senegal takes over AU chairmanship in 2022 , which promotes issues of coordination and cooperation of regional integration associations, and also significantly increases interaction with the BRICS countries, primarily with China .

The second track within the framework of BRICS+ can be a platform for interaction between regional integration blocs, in which the BRICS countries participate. This kind of platform may include the priority regional integration projects of the BRICS countries – MERCOSUR, the South African Customs Union, BIMSTEK, the EAEU, as well as the RCEP or the Free Trade Area of ​​China and ASEAN. All these regional blocs can cooperate in a coordinated manner towards the harmonization of standards and a more open economic space for trade and investment by the BRICS countries and their regional partners. It is important to note that at this stage, most of the countries of the association form their foreign trade policy precisely in the format of regional integration blocs (RF-EAEU, Brazil-MERCOSUR, South Africa – SACU).

When creating such platforms, the spirit of multilateralism and the construction of a new architecture in the interests of the entire expanded format of the global South is important. Attempts to form BRICS+ on the basis of exclusively narrow national interests may adversely affect the prospects for the development of the BRICS+ initiative itself and other multilateral initiatives of the BRICS countries. For BRICS+ as a new format of interaction between the BRICS countries, the key to success lies in the multimodality of various formats of interaction within the framework of BRICS+, which can take into account the entire range of national interests and priorities of the BRICS countries and their regional partners.

Thus, within the framework of the BRICS+ format, two tracks of interaction between the countries of the global South can be formed:

1. The SCO + AU + SELAC format is the most inclusive and focused on the broad interaction of developing countries in international organizations. This kind of format may to a greater extent reflect the vision of China, announced back in 2017 by Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, who announced BRICS+ as the largest platform for interaction for developing countries.
2. A platform for the “integration of integrations” of regional economic groupings, in which the leaders are the BRICS countries. This format largely reflects the Russian BRICS+ development concept announced by Sergey Ryabkov at the beginning of 2018: “We invite our partners to consider the BRICS+ format as a development platform for what could be called ‘integration of integrations’.”

If the Chinese BRICS+ format is a kind of maximum coverage of the global South in breadth, then for the Russian BRICS+ format, the depth and harmonization of the integration of priority regional projects of the BRICS countries becomes more important.

In general, the number of tracks and formats of interaction between developing countries can be much larger and reflect the globalization vision of each member of the BRICS bloc. In other words, the BRICS+ platform can be the basis for the divergence of models and platforms for development and economic integration, in contrast to the unipolar/“mono-model” approach of the integration processes of developed countries. In this regard, for the development of the BRICS+ format within this kind of divergence of development patterns, it is important that India, Brazil and South Africa also present their vision of the BRICS+ concept, as well as globalization within the global South and beyond. It is possible that for India,

Activation of the role of BRICS in the international arena can also occur through the improvement of the mechanism of functioning of the Pool of Conditional Foreign Exchange Reserves (CUVR) of the BRICS. In the last few years, the BRICS RWR has stepped up coordination with other regional financial institutions (RFIs) through regular IMF consultations with regional financial facilities. At the same time, the activity of the BRICS PWR has been significantly lower in response to the crisis in the BRICS countries in recent years compared to the BRICS NDBs. Within the framework of the BRICS+ mechanism, it would be possible to consider the possibility of strengthening the mandate of the BRICS IWR to monitor the macroeconomic situation in the BRICS countries, to develop coordinated anti-crisis measures, as well as to interact with the BRICS IWR with other RFIs of developing countries and regional partners of the BRICS countries. In particular, it would be possible to form a regular mechanism for coordinating the BRICS IWRP with the Eurasian Fund for Stabilization and Development (EFSD), the Chiang Mai Initiative of the ASEAN countries and their regional partners (CMIM), as well as the Latin American RFO FLAR. Another direction could be the expansion of membership in the BRICS IWR by including regional partners of the BRICS countries, including a number of countries that have received membership in the BRICS NDB.

The prospects for the transformation of the world economy are largely related to the coordination of actions between the largest countries of the global South, primarily between the BRICS countries. However, for a truly global restart of the development of the world economy, a more expanded format of BRICS + interaction is needed, which will allow other countries of the developing world to be involved in this process. In this case, the reformatting of the global economy will become truly inclusive and sustainable. An important tool for scaling up the transformation of the world economy can be the format of “integration of integrations” within the framework of cooperation between regional integration blocs of the countries of the global South. China’s BRICS Presidency in 2022 can give an additional impetus to the processes of building platforms for interaction between regional groupings of developing countries.

This kind of BRICS progress towards creating platforms for cooperation between regional integration associations of developing countries can become the basis for the formation of a common platform for cooperation among all countries of the global South. This expanded platform could contribute to the growth of the inclusive development and openness of the countries of the global South, their greater dynamism, the structuring of integration associations, filling the vacuum and “white spots” on the map of the integration processes of the developing world. So far, we have to state that developed countries are much more provided with dynamic and structured integration associations compared to the countries of the global South.

Yaroslav Lisovolik , Doctor of Economics, Program Director of the Valdai International Discussion Club, RIAC Member

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
March 9, 2022 Anno Domini 

It might seem that Russia is extremely negatively affected by Western sanctions over Putin’s invasion of sovereign Ukraine this past month. 

But when you consider Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn’s Perestroika Deception revelations and Duginist goals, the plan is moving right along to eventual Eurasianist world hegemony in preparation for the coming Judaeo-masonic moshiach (false messiah).

The Neo-Soviets in the Kremlin have always wanted to capture Ukraine—the gateway to the West—overtly (they have controlled Ukraine covertly since the times of the official USSR), and they now have it within reach. Although it might seem like a dumb move, with world scorn being heaped on Russia, it’s actually all by design. The long-range Soviet strategists under Putin have anticipated most, if not all, Western reactionary measures to Russia’s outrageous and arrogant hard manoeuvre in Ukraine. And with co-operation from traitors within the Soviet-friendly Western establishment (both political and big business), the transition should run smoothly. Although the average Russian might suffer more during this process, Putin and his cadre of Jewish oligarchs will be just fine. For example, Russian-Jewish oligarch Roman Abramovich does not appear to be selling Chelsea FC out of desperation but in preparation for a massive wealth transfer to the new system.

The plan seems to be to shift Russia and its Soviet Bloc allies in both Europe and the Islamic world to a China-led Eurasianist social credit system, leaving the SWIFT-based Western nations isolated from this consolidating alliance. As the Eurasianists “convince” (via debt traps, nuclear blackmail, etc.) more sovereign nations to join their new economic bloc, like they have done with the Belt and Road initiative, the Western establishment will become more isolated and more dependent on resources outside of its reach, resulting in more economic and political instability—as if the Soviet-created Scamdemic weren’t destabilizing enough. When the Synagogue of Satan BEAST feels that it is ready to pull the plug on the Western financial system, they will do so, leaving Eurasia as the only financially secure power. While there may be a brief period where the world is “multi-polar”, once the West finally is laid in a cheap Made-In-China coffin, Eurasia will become the defacto unipolar bear under their Chabadnik king despot of the world, just as the Protocols of Zion and the Holy Bible said would happen.

Likely, none of the aforementioned will happen without a global conflict that might even see Westerners (especially whites) drafted to fight and die in a scripted war. Economist Chris Pirnak says we will have WWIII by mid-decade or so, with three more years of buildup—a very plausible scenario. Once America and freshly Brexited Great Britain are completely isolated and their elites realize that they have been double crossed by their Eurasianist benefactors, likely they will mount a last ditch effort to save the crumbling Western empire using their outdated and inferior technology (due to decades of Soviet-Israel technology theft) and us plebes as cannon fodder. It seems that by that time, Europe will have already been brought into the Eurasianist system, via energy dependence and/or nuclear blackmail.

Once the world is subjected to Eurasianist unipolarity with pesky Western civilization relegated to a Third World existence in its (nuclear?) devastated homelands, the Jewish false messiah can emerge as king despot. It’s likely he (she?) will bring a seeming neutral “peace” that ends WW3 (even though Eurasianist hegemony had been preplanned all along). It could be a plug-and-play anti-Christ for Eurasia who could come from within the centre of the catalyst for this great war, Crimea or perhaps Kazakhstan, which might then be hailed as the New Khazaria or New Jerusalem. It’s likely that the state of Israel as we know it will be brought down politically, along with the West, so that the Eurasianists can claim to have defeated Zionism and its so called puppeteers America and Great Britain once and for all. The Hassidic Jews continue to hint at an Eastern European/Russian born messiah. For this reason, a New Jerusalem makes sense. It could also dupe many Christians-turned-Noahides by way of counterfeiting Bible prophecy of the New Jerusalem coming down from Heaven.

As an aside, I suspect that a UFO-alien “breakthrough” will be used somewhere in this massive global deception to usher in anti-Christ, although it’s difficult to pinpoint exactly how and at what stage. It could be “assistance from the star people” that is publicly lauded as helping the anti-Christ bring peace at the end of the Third World War. A fancy light show, smoke, and mirrors would legitimize this deception in the minds of the gullible masses that survive the war and pestilences.

.

“The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.”

– Crypto-Jew David Rockefeller

.

Within this article, the core point we will be exploring is how Jews took over China and converted the country to communism, resulting in a government controlled by a crypto-Jewish and Masonic elite. However, before moving into the material that breaks down the 2-step process the Jews used to usher in communism, I will be touching on the history of the Jews in China because they were a very successful group of people; And an evergrowing people. Chinese Jewry held high positions of government, & were running banks, newspapers & were rich in general at the time of key revolutions as well. So, understanding how Chinese Jewry worked together for hundreds of years leading up to the creation of the CCP is absolutely a fundamental element to look at. By the end of the article, it will become evident that Chinese Jews were (& are) more powerful and influential than you might have previously thought.

.

A brief look into the history of Chinese Jewry (≈750-1750ad):

.

.

China has a long and complex Jewish history tracing all the way back to the early eighth century. The eighth century proof of the earliest presence of Jews in China was a business letter written in the Judeo-Persian language, found by Marc Aurel Stein (1) – And below is a page of Hebrew prayers dated to the late 8th century, early 9th.

.

.

As you can see there was Chinese Jewish activity dating back to the 8th century which opened the door for centuries worth of time to grow as a secret crypto-Jewish population (Evidence for this will be shown later in the article) and gain power and influence in general. This is very pertinent to keep in mind moving forward. The most prominent Chinese Jews are the Kaifeng Jews and they had set up a colony with a Synagogue around 950ad (2) and interestingly enough they were “located along the ancient Silk Route” (3) where Jews have been known to dominate as forefront traders since the very creation in 200 BC (4). Right around the time that the above mentioned Kaifeng Jewish community became settled along the Silk Route, there was a Jewish imperial clan that was established in Kaifeng (960 ad). They became known as the House of Zhao under the Song Dynasty.

.

“Confucianism have formed a relatively large number of groups among the Jews in the early Qing Dynasty…Among these Jewish Confucian scholars, Zhao Yingcheng, who is in the Zhao family, is the most representative and has the greatest influence.” (5)

.

An interesting side note to look at (keep in mind the CCP is a Jewish creation/tool)

.

.

It is also interesting to note that during Marco Polo’s 17 years in China (in the 13th century) he noticed that Jews had a noticeable amount of political influence.

.

“Some accidental observations in Marco Polo’s trips, show that Jews were sufficient enough to be able to exert political influence in China and Tartaria” (6)

.

.

.

The Kaifeng Jews quickly rose to the top of Chinese life and really started to reach a level of success for the whole of the Jews never seen before under the Ming dynasty.

.

“…during the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644),…the Jewish life thrived there.” (7)

.

“The Jews of Kaifeng were once an affluent group in the 16th century.” (8)

.

“During this period (Ming Dynasty), the Kaifeng Jewish community entered a Golden Age…they were encouraged to fully engage in the local society, including public affairs and government service.” (9)

.

The Ming Dynasty clearly had some sort of close relationship with the Jews. Not only did they encourage the Jews to fully engage in society at all levels, but also assigned seven surnames to different Jews. Some of these names are still known today.

.

“During the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644), a Ming emperor assigned seven surnames to Jews, by which they are still known today: Ai, Shi, Gao, Jin, Li, Zhang, and Zhao. Of these, Jin and Shi are reminiscent of Western Jewish names: Gold and Stone. The 1489 inscription lists seven others: Yen, Kao, Mu, Huang, Nie, An, Zuo, Bai, and Zhou. Apparently, only seven names survived after 1642.” (10)

.

.

After the fall of the Ming Dynasty to a rebel army led by Li Zicheng, a short-lived dynasty reigned for 5 years and was eventually replaced by the Qing dynasty. (Kaifeng Jews & descendants of the House of Zhao) Zhao Yingcheng and his brother Zhao Yingdou, also a mandarin, held important government posts in the 1660s under the newly formed Qing dynasty.

.

Zhao Yingcheng and his brother also “were instrumental in rebuilding the synagogue that was destroyed in the flood of 1642″ (11)

.

It is paramount to understand that these Jews operate like your average religious Jew you see in America or anywhere else. To take an example, the Jews of China in the 19th century were observed to only marry wives of their own religion. Since the Kaifeng Jews were like this during the 19th century, it is safe to say it was the same deal for the preceding centuries considering the known facts: Same religion, same practices, population growth etc.

.

These Chinese Jews are totally assimilated into Chinese culture, but are a separate, hidden conspiratorial body amongst the Chinese people.

.

Academic Article in the Journal “The Leisure Hour” on ‘The Jews of China’ page 333: “The Jews of China 1867 – “They (The Chinese Jews) keep their faith with the characteristic tenacity that distinguishes the hebrew race, and even now only marry wives of their own religion” (12)

.

Historian Henry Hart Milman: “They (Chinese Jews) had cultivated learning with success; and some of them as it was attested by extant inscriptions had been highly honoured with the imperial favour, and had attained the rank of mandarins. One of these inscriptions —dated in 1515— praises the Jews for their integrity and fidelity in agriculture, commerce, magistracy and in the army, and for the adequate observance of their own religious ceremonies” he then goes on to say “in other aspects they are strictly Jews… they only marry among themselves… they neither make nor attempt to make proselytes” (13)

.

As mentioned, although (((they))) look to be Chinese, they are actually just representing the Jew and work for a foreign nation and people. To put it another way, they are Jews disguised as Chinese, blending in providing easy-access for infiltration and control of the entire country.

.

Fr Fahey on Jews living in other countries:

.

“The members of the Jewish nation, while retaining their allegiance to their own nation, are also citizens of other nations. Given the messianic aspirations of their own nation they are bound to strive for the domination of their nation over the others, as they are firmly convinced that in this way alone justice and peace will reign upon the earth. The positions attained by them in the councils and legislative assemblies of other nations must logically be for them, at least primarily, means for advancing the domination of their own people…when they assist as secretaries of Lloyd George and Clemenceau and adviser of President Wilson, then we know that English, French and American citizenship will be utilised for the furtherance of the interests of a nation that believes firmly that English, French and Americans are destined by God to be subject to it.” (14)

.

.

It is no different with Chinese Jews.

.

The fact of the matter is that Jews have always banded together as a tribe, have worked vigorously to infiltrate governments, they have monopolized financial systems of nations, instigated wars, and worked to intentionally create chaos and division in societies. The international media being in the hands of the Jews will not shed light on these very simple facts of life.

.

From everything gathered so far it has been established that the Jews have been successful and have held positions of influence and power for centuries whilst maintaining that classic tribal Jew behaviour. I hope now that you can understand why studying the history of the Chinese Jews is so crucial (And this was just a quick run-down!). All of this success and power just allows the Jews to continue to grow in numbers and infiltrate successfully like they have done in every other country they have lived. With the history of successful Chinese Jews in mind, I want to move closer to the time when Jews worked-out their two-step process of paving the way for Chinese communism to give you the same picture – That the Jews were still influential then. Once you see the evidence that the Jews have been thriving in China for many centuries, including at the time of the events that were necessary to open the door to Communism, you can put two-and-two together and see clearly their hand would have been active in these events.

.

Jewish activity in China (1800-≈1930):

.

In 1864, a Jewish officer in the British navy estimated that Chinese Jews are a total of 1 million.

.

And decades later we see that a Jew, Mr. Soss, gave a report to a New York Times correspondent that there are nearly 5,000,000 Jews in China! (15) Not only that, but the Jews of China were successful and honored with many of high standing status in society.

.

The success of the Chinese Jews in the early 1900’s is attested to in the following newspaper as well (1905).

.

Hence why we see Rabbi Jacob S. Raisin describe Chinese Jewry in this way: “They (Chinese Jews) constantly increased in number in China producing wise and cultured people.” (16)

.

Thinking back on all of this key information, it makes perfect sense when Catholic journalist Istvan Bakony says: “But it seems to be a special characteristic of Chinese Judaism, as many Israelite historians have said — and also these archeological monuments confirm — that Chinese Jews Tiao-Kiu-Kiaou were experts in agriculture. This has allowed them to infiltrate among the peasants, just as their great military talents have also allowed their infiltration in the army, creating a fifth column of Israelite Imperialism infiltrated at all levels in China.” (17)

.

What’s even more astounding, is that during the 19th & 20th centuries while all of these Chinese Jews continued to gain more power, outside diaspora Jews came to China themselves and were also dominating China! So clearly, there was collaboration between them.

.

An academic paper on the history of Jews in Shanghai, records:

.

“Jewish traders were among the first foreigners to come to work and live in Shanghai when the port was first opened to foreign trade in November 1843. Despite the important role a number of these Jewish residents played in Shanghai as well as in international commerce at that time and for a century to follow, scholars are just beginning to focus their attention on this community” (18)

.

Furthermore, an article written by a Jew has to say: “Shanghai was a city of tremendous opportunities, an international city open and free to all who wished to come there and make a quick fortune. The Babylonian Jews took full advantage of this and were extremely successful.” (19)

.

Likewise, an article coming from another Jew writing on the Jews of Shanghai: “There was a large and varied Jewish community in Old Shanghai. They were some of the richest people in the city, and built many of the grandest structures, including the Cathay Hotel on the Bund” (20)

.

The Times of Israel openly admits that these Jewish traders ran Shanghai! (21) Among these Jewish traders were the Sassoons, the “Rothschilds of the East”.

.

The earliest records of Sassoon and Kaifeng-Jewish collaboration is from 1850. Using common-sense, the Chinese Jews were obviously helping and working with all the diaspora Jews that started moving in – not just with the Sassoons.

.

.

An example of collaboration that demonstrates other significant tasks being completed between the Chinese Jews and the new Jews that moved in, is a man named Bruno Schindler who was actively involved. “He was the editor and head of the publishing firm Lund Humphries & Co. Ltd., as well as founder and editor of the journal Asia Major and the co-founder and publisher of the journal Islamica, Caucasica, and Armenia. During a visit to Shanghai in 1913, he helped to found a Jewish community there.” (22)

.

Also, in the early 20th century around the 1920’s, “Jewish Soviet agents who, while in Kaifeng, established relations with the remnants of the Jewish community there…” (23)

.

As a result of Jewish domination in China in the 1800’s and 1900’s, Shanghai turned into “a haven for thousands of Russian Jews fleeing revolution in the 1920s. In the next decade, some 20,000 Jews came to escape Hitler’s Germany” (24). These Russian Jews were not fleeing – They were Jewish bolsheviks sent to China to become senior advisors to the future heads of the CCP. This topic will be expanded on later in the article.

.

It was also during the 19th-20th centuries that the Jews worked to lay the foundation of Freemasonry in China; The Jews became the leaders of the lodges as well.

.

Scholarly book written by a Jew –

.

“Masonry was an important agent for business advancement and social integration with the foreign community and provided relaxation, away from the less salubrious diversions abounding in Shanghai. Jews had no difficulty in rising up the ranks of freemasonry and many served as Masters of their Lodges. The District Grand Lodge of North China, constituted at Shanghai on 9 November 1877, had several high ranking Jewish members” (25)

.

The author also states that during the 1920’s the continued success of Jews in Freemasonry since it was constituted in 1877, never ceased. “Shanghai Sephardim were well represented in Freemasonry lodges, and several belonged to more than one of the eleven lodges in the North China District” (26)

.

.

So clearly there was a Masonic network put in place by the Jews and the combination of crypto-Chinese Jews and outside diaspora Jews dominated these lodges. Next, the Jews sought to extend their B’nai B’rith lodges into China and managed to do so by 1928. These exclusively Jewish lodges were then met with growing success by 1930. (27)

.

.

The Two-Step Process to bring Communism

.

STEP 1: 1st Sino-Japan war (1894-1895)

.

The Jews brought China to communism through the first and main task, which was creating a movement to overthrow the Qing dynasty. The Jews managed to do this by first, using the destabiliser of the 1st Sino-Japan war, causing political upheavals led by Sun Yat-sen that resulted in the 1911 revolution and the formation of a Republic (which was created in faking anti-communism for future dialectic of Chinese Nationalists & Chinese Communists). During the period of the Republic, (((they))) consolidated, defined and unified the Chinese territory which was for a time under control of diverse military cliques. This period was known as the Warlord Era. (28)

.

From 1900 to 1949 when the Jewish communists took power, around 8,963,000 people were killed as a result of the struggle for Republicanism in China (29). Ask yourself, who truly benefited from the fall of the Qing Dynasty and all the death and destruction that followed? Certainly not the ethnic Chinese! It was the Jews who, once again, benefitted from the death of others.

.

In 1912 Sun Yat-Sen appointed Chen Jintao, the founder of the Bank of China, to chief financial officer and head of the central audit office in Beijing (30) and then in 1924 Sun established the centralization of the Chinese banking system (31).

.

Sources that highlight Jewish involvement in 1911 revolution:

.

Jewish website translating a fragment of the book “The Jews in China” edited by prof. Pan Guang: “Some Jews were involved in the creation of the “new China”, and to this day they are putting all their energy into the development of reforms in China.” (32)

.

“New China” refers to the early republic that was formed after the fall of the last dynasty.

.

Euro-Asian Jewish Congress: “In the history of new China, after the Xinhai (bourgeois) revolution of 1911, Jews were actively involved in the formation of a new state. The absence of anti-Semitism in the Chinese cultural tradition, the support of the authorities (from emperors to leaders of the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China) allowed the Jewish communities of China to go a long and prosperous path of development.” (33)

.

They helped create New China and they were then honored in New China for decades to follow.

(34)

.

Sources that elucidate Chinese Secret societies / Freemasonry having a role in the 1911 revolution:

.

.

Andreeva Svetlana Gennadievna, Candidate of Historical Sciences:

.

“Thus, the parties that emerged during the Xinhai Revolution largely bore the features of traditional associations. Family or provincial affiliation was the decisive factor in the creation of the party. In some cases, traditional Chinese secret societies became the main party.” (35)

.

Chen Jiongming, a Freemason, supported Sun Yat-sen’s revolutionary efforts to overthrow the Qing dynasty. Therefore, Sun Yat-sen’s revolution had the support of Freemasonry. (36)

.

Sun Yat-Sen, the leader of the revolution, was also a Freemason. This will be explored later in the article.

.

More bolshevik Jews came to China shortly after the revolution –

.

Russian-Jewish Magazine LECHAIM: “In 1914 and after the 1917 revolution, Jews again pulled from Russia to China. The largest Jewish community then appeared in Harbin – 25 thousand people. Newspapers were published, Jewish hospitals and schools were opened, and Zionist organizations arose. Until the 1930s, there was an intense cultural life in both Russian and Jewish communities in China.” (37)

.

Earlier in the article there were a couple sources that also displayed many Bolshevik Jews coming to China during the 1910-1930’s period as well, hence;

.

(38)

.

STEP 2: 2nd Japan-Sino war (1937-1945)

.

The second Japan-Sino war was the war that was to over-turn the Republic and install communism.

.

Interesting side note: David Crook, a Jew who was a communist ideologue and spy was recruited to the NKVD Soviet secret police & was sent to China during the second Japan-Sino war. (39)

.

Harry Dexter White, Jew, was a senior U.S. Treasury department official and a major architect of the IMF, as well as its first director.

During the Chinese Civil War (1927-1949), he intentionally destroyed the economy of Nationalist China, financially crippling their middle class. This destabilised the administration of Chiang Kai-Shek, in preparation for him to be ‘defeated’ and communism imposed.

.

33rd degree Freemasons & Crypto-Jews Roosevelt, Churchill with Chiang Kai-Shek (1943)

.

Because of the Jews’ unseen control over Japan (Protocol 7) in combination with international Jewish finance directly influencing Japan, they were able to execute this two-step process successfully. (The Crypto-Jewish control over Japan needs to be dedicated to another article)

.

It was Jewish finance that played a critical role in the recognition of Japan’s emergence on the world stage in the first place!

.

.

.

.

In China, the three main characters of the process were Sun Yat-Sen, Chiang Kai-shek & Mao Zedong. Each of them will be individually examined and then all will be tied together in the end.

.

Sun Yat-Sen:

.

1) He was a Freemason (41)

.

2) His wife was a Jewess

.

Istvan Bakony: “Jews have also used their women in China to ensnare great leaders, following the rules fixed in the Book of Esther in the Bible already mentioned, which tells how the Jewish Esther, hiding her Israelite origin and religion, beguiled the Persian Emperor into falling in love and marrying her, thus becoming Empress of Persia. From this position, she engineered the appointment of her uncle as the Prime Minister. In China the Song family of Tiao-Kiu-Kiaou Jews obtained great successes in this century by the same means. One of the Song sisters married Dr. Sun Yat-sen, the man who ousted the ancient Chinese monarchy and founded the Republic, becoming the first President. Another sister married Marshall Chiang Kai-shek, President of Nationalist China. Dr. Sun Yet-sen’s widow became a member of the Maoist Popular China, where she presently lives and where, with the prestige of being the widow of the national hero, she can undoubtedly help the plans of International Judaism.” (42)

.

Mr. Bakony’s comment about Sun’s widow helping the plans of international Judaism makes perfect sense when we consider the following as well:

.

(43)

.

&

.

“Madame Sun Yat Sen played a big role in assisting chairman Mao Zedong” (44)

.

.

3) Jewish handlers outside of Freemasonry

.

.

As you can see here Crypto-Jew John D Rockefeller (& other (((American))) financiers) were puppeteering Sun Yat-Sen in this example. It does make perfect sense that Sun would be turning to big finance from Jews because 1) He was a mason, 2) “Sun(Yat-Sen)…relied on rich capitalists” (45)

.

Hence why Wang Jingwei, who was a close associate of Sun Yat-sen, believed powerful Jews shared much affinity with him. (46)

.

Sun Yat-Sen had Jewish senior advisors throughout his time as a leader. These were his main Jewish handlers that we know of:

.

1) Mikhail Borodin Bolshevik revolutionary and Communist International (Comintern) agent. Advisor to Sun and the Kuomintang (KMT) in China during the 1920s. (47) [Until 1927]

.

Jewish Newspaper: ⁨⁨LaMerhav⁩ – ⁨למרחב⁩⁩, 1 July 1964:

.

“His (Borodin) most important mission was given to him in 1923 when he was sent by the [Jewish] Soviet government to China, to serve as chief political adviser to Sun Yat-san” (48)

.

.

2) Morris A. Cohen “Cohen of Canada” considered in the “inner circle of Sun” (fake anti-communist – planted agent) (49)

.

A Jewish news website has this to say about Cohen:

.

“The man is sometimes referred to as “the uncrowned Jewish king of China.” Moishe Avraham Cohen was born in Poland to a poor ultra-Orthodox Jewish family who immigrated to London in 1887. The London street boy went into a bad culture, was arrested by the police for pickpocketing and arrived at an institution for young Jewish criminals (funded by the Rothschild family …)” (50)

.

A revealing excerpt from the Jewish Newspaper: The Observer, 6 March 1942:

.

“Cohen was involved in all the intricacies in which the Chinese continent was located, and as the president’s personal adviser, he became one of the important forces, operating behind the scenes. In 1923 he met another Jew, Michael Borodin, who was caught up in China on a mission by Lenin and the Third International (…) These two Jews weaved the threads of their influence from behind the curtain.” (51)

.

In addition, here is an article from the Jewish Press meant for a Jewish audience:

.

“The Chinese called him Ma Kun (“clenched fist”), which was as close as they could get to Morris Cohen. He procured arms for a warlord of Canton in the 1920s and was adviser to Wu Tiecheng, the Canton police chief who later became mayor of Shanghai. Cohen began to serve as part of Sun’s guard force, and eventually commanded the entire 250-man presidential bodyguard unit.

.

.

Eventually he was appointed head of the Chinese secret service. His sidekick was another Jew, an anti-Soviet Russian named Moses Schwartzberg who had been part of a [alleged] plot to assassinate Lenin in 1918.

.

Because of the importance of the Schwartzberg-Cohen pair, Yiddish became one of the three languages of the Chinese secret service, after Mandarin and English. Schwartzberg would later organize a regiment of 1,200 Jewish volunteers to fight for Israel in its War of Independence.

.

After Sun Yat-sen died, Two-Gun Cohen was named commander of the Chinese 19th field army.” (52)

.

Yiddish was used as a language by the Chinese secret service due to the fact that both open Jews and crypto-Jews dominated. A blog writer who exposes organized Jewry makes a very good comment to consider: “Can you imagine, today, a foreigner being the bodyguard of the current Chinese President or an alien Jew being the head of the present day Chinese secret service? Now, my dear readers, do you understand the incredible influence the Jews had in creating and shaping modern China? Unless you understand the Jews, you will never understand the true history of modern China.” (53)

.

Another Jewish website stated: “In Chiang’s army, Moshe Cohen became famous, was appointed general and became responsible for intelligence and military training. In the communist army there were many of the Jews of the communities in Harbin and Shanghai and many refugees who fled Europe joined and fought in its ranks.” (54)

.

3) Moses Schwartzberg Russian Bolshevik, his story to China is a fake cover to be labelled as ‘anti-communist’; (55)

.

All Jewish.

.

Jewish legal advisor to the Chinese government honored (1921)

.

.

.

4) He is a Zionist, Pro-Jewish

.

Quite characteristically of a Freemason, Sun Yet-Sen had bent his knee to his Jewish Masonic masters. We see this evidently when “Sun Yat-Sen, the first president of China, saw inspiration for China in the Zionist effort to build a homeland for the Jews in Palestine”. This reinforced the already good image of the Jews in China & produced increased positive attitudes towards them. (56)

.

SunYat-sen also stated “that the Jewish nation has made major contributions to all areas of the world’s civilization and should have an honorable position in the world” which encourages more Jewish influence in China essentially. Sun Yat-Sen was clearly your average propped up Masonic puppet. (57)

.

And;

.

Sun: “I … wish to assure you of my sympathy for this movement (Zionism) – which is one of the greatest movements of the present time… to restore your wonderful and historic nation… which rightly deserves an honourable place in the family of nations.” (58)

.

Direct link between top-Jewish Zionist family in China & Sun Yat-Sen:

.

“Sun Yat-sen, the first president of the Republic of China, wrote to Elly Kadoorie that the Jews were a “wonderful and historic nation, which has contributed so much to the civilization of the world.” Kadoorie, an active Zionist, helped persuade him to endorse the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which laid the groundwork for the founding of the state of Israel.” (59)

.

Chiang Kai-shek:

.

1) His wife was a Jew

.

Same quote above from Mr. Bakony: “Another (Jewish) sister married Marshall Chiang Kai-shek, President of Nationalist China.”

.

“In time he (Jew, Elly Kadoorie) built the grandest mansion in the city—43 rooms for just three people—and entertained celebrities like Charles Lindbergh. The Kadoories’ hotels hosted the world’s elites, including the wedding of Chiang Kai-shek.” (60)

.

⁨⁨The Palestine Post⁩⁩, 31 March 1946: Chiang Kai-shek and his wife sent money as a gift to a Jewish family that runs a memorial hall at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.

.

.

2) Surrounded by many Jews (all of the same Jews as Yat-Sen + more)

.

.

“During the civil war in China, Victor Sassoon chose to work with Chiang Kai-shek’s Kuomintang government.” (61)

.

Ma Fuxiang was a Chinese military and political leader that spanned from the Qing Dynasty into the early Republic of China. Shortly after the rise of the national government of China, he became very close with them and was appointed a member of the Central Executive Committee of the Kuomintang. He also was extremely close with the Jewish community and at one point was a principal donor to the establishment of a synagogue and a Hebrew school. He was an evident Chinese crypto-Jew. Fuxiang became a “sworn brother of President Chiang Kai-shek” (62)

.

.

Here is a source showing Chiang greeting “ISRAEL’S MESSENGER”

.

.

“(Chiang Kai-shek’s) Chinese National Government has decorated Sir Elly Kadoorie and Sir Victor Sassoon, two of Shanghai’s foremost Jews, with the First Class Gold Medal” (63)

.

Sir Victor Sassoon also bankrolled the Nationalist Chinese under Chiang Kai-shek (64) and because the Jews knew the defeat of the Nationalists was coming due to their foreknowledge, the Sassoon’s and other Jews sold their considerable financial holdings in time (65).

.

.

“Throughout his life, Chiang Kai-shek relied on foreigners, whether Russian, German or American, but never trusted them (and in a retrospective view, for good reasons) (White, 1978: 157). Yet, Jews were different. Aware of the Jewish contribution to the Chinese revolution (of 1911), this is what he said following his stay in Moscow in 1923:

.

“Most of the Russian leaders holding responsible party and government positions who expressed regard for Dr. Sun and sincere desire to cooperate with China in her National Revolution were Jews, the only exceptions being Kamenev and Chicherin who were Russians [actually Kamenev was also Jewish]. These Jews […] aroused my special interest. I found that men like Trotsky, Zinoviev, Radek and Joffe were, comparatively speaking, more concerned with the question of cooperation between the Kuomintang and the Russian Communist Party (Chiang, 1957: 22).” (66)

.

New Synagogue built under Chiang Kai-Shek’s government:

.

.

3) Chiang Ching-kuo was a politician of the Republic of China after its exile to Taiwan. The eldest and only biological son of former president Chiang Kai-shek. He served as Premier of the Republic of China between 1972 and 1978, and was the President of the Republic from 1978 until his death in 1988.

.

Chiang Ching-kuo went to the Soviet Union in 1925 to Sun Yat-Sen Moscow University (Jew-Controlled) and after studying there for a couple years he met Chiang Fang-liang who would become the First Lady of the Republic of China – she was a Jewess. (67) He married a Jewess, and so did his Son. (Probably Crypto-Jews)

.

The Jew Pavel Mif was prorector of Sun Yat-sen Communist University in Moscow under the Jew Karl Radek.

.

“Moscow Sun Yat-sen University was a Comintern school, which operated from 1925–1930 in the city of Moscow, Russia, then the Soviet Union. It was a training camp for Chinese revolutionaries from both the Kuomintang (KMT) and the Communist Party of China (CPC). ” (68)

.

This is just more affirmation that the CPC and KMT were both Jew-controlled.

.

Mao Zedong:

.

1) Mao was a Kaifeng Jew

.

Zionist paper ‘Moscow-Jerusalem’, Dec 1993: “The first repatriates from China will land at Ben-Gurion airport Dec 26, 1993, the 100th anniversary of the birth of the great son of the Kaifeng community, Chairman Mao” (69)

.

2) In the 1920s Mao stayed in Shanghai at a property owned by the prominent Jewish Hardoons on present-day Anyi Road (Mao would have been surrounded by Jews and Freemasons) (70)

.

.

3) Skull and Bones Secret Society at Yale

.

“In China: Mao Zedong was installed through the Skull and Bones Secret Society operating out of Yale University. In 1903, Yale Divinity School established a number of schools and hospitals throughout China that were collectively known as ‘Yale in China’. Mao was hired as the editor of the Yale-in-China journal and subsequently, he set up a ‘culture bookstore’ in 1920, the buildings of which belonged to the Yale group.” (71)

.

.

William F. Buckley was also in the Skull and Bones secret society (72)

.

> Buckley gets a eulogy from Jew Henry Kissinger (73)

.

.

4) When Mao took power, he was helped by Jews, his government was pro-Jewish (with Jews in key positions) & his handlers were Jews

.

“After the Communists took over power of the country in 1949, the Chinese government, especially the local governments of the cities where Jews lived, instituted a very liberal policy toward the Jewish religion, permitting the Jews to maintain their synagogues and to carry on their regular activities.” (74)

.

.

Russian academic & Jew Leonid Eilman reveals a Chinese student told him that communist heads Deng Xiaoping & Zhou Enlai were Jews: “In Shanghai, Harbin, Jews who arrived from Russia already in this century, and there are a lot of ancient Jews. We call them “Hakka” – aliens. They speak Old Chinese and have thicker beards than the Chinese. They try not to mix with the local population, and after our revolution they entered the ranks of the party leaders: Zhou Enlai and his friend Deng Xiaoping!” (75)

.

Mao and his Soviet mentors; Keeping in mind the Soviets were in fact Jews. (Sources in the article have already shown Jewish soviets were sent to China, but for proof Jews took over Russia in 1917, see footnote. (76))

.

.

Jewish author on the status of Jews in China under Mao;

.

(77)

.

Before the Chinese Communist Revolution & after there was a Pro-Jewish government which displays the Jewish penetration of the highest levels of China – “Today’s Chinese scholars sometimes refer back to significant, earlier statements, such as President Sun Yat Sen’s support for Zionism during the early 1920s. An important fact, often overlooked, is that in China, the Communist Revolution did not oppose or try to obliterate these earlier opinion trends. (…) a few documented statements and gestures, for example by Mao Zedong and Zhou Enlai, indicate a measure of sympathy for Jews rather than antipathy. It is no wonder foreign Jews joined the Communists’ fight & befriended the revolutionary leaders, became Chinese citizens” (78)

.

“In late 1959, the CCP Central Committee decided to form a team to translate a fourth volume of Mao’s Selected Works into English, and to revise the outdated English translation of the first three volumes, issued by the mid1950s. Work began in early 1960 by a team of fourteen, of which nine were Chinese (Oxford-educated scholars, Foreign Ministry, Foreign Languages Press and Foreign Languages Institute officials) and five foreigners: Sydney Rittenberg, Frank Coe, Israel Epstein, Sol Adler, and Michael Shapiro – all Jewish.” (79)

.

“It is in this field of journalism (especially translation and editing) as well as teaching foreign languages, that the Jewish expats in China made a significant contribution to the PRC in its first thirty years, exposing it and making it accessible to the world.” (80)

.

Interestingly, the first Western business to reestablish relations with China were the Jewish Rothschilds, & Chase (Controlled by Crypto-Jewish Rockefellers) became the first US correspondent to the Bank of China. The Jews first converted the country to communism, got their men in key positions & then allowed Jewish business outside of China to come in first as a priority.

.

The prominent Jewish Kadoorie family “maintained covert ties with the mainland and never publicly criticized the communist regime. The strategy paid off in 1978, when the Kadoories were welcomed back by Deng Xiaoping and invested a billion dollars in China’s first nuclear plant. Later they helped to keep Hong Kong calm as the British negotiated its handover to China, which took place in 1997. “You have always been a friend to China,” an aide to Xi Jinping told Michael Kadoorie, grandson of Elly and the current head of the family.” (81)

.

To this day, the Kadoories are one of China’s biggest foreign investors and the family meets REGULARLY with top Chinese leaders, including Xi Jinping. (82)

.

As a relevant side note: Billionaire Jewish supremacist Shaul Eisenberg was actually the man who pioneered Israel’s trade relations with China back in 1979. He was a Mossad official who operated in Asia for the majority of his time. “Eisenberg helped arrange a secret meeting between the two sides that resulted in the first of many deals to transfer defense technology from Israel to China [Stolen American tech]. Over the next two decades, military technology transfers between Israel and China totaled between $1 billion and $2 billion in more than 60 transactions. Ties were formalized in 1992.” (83)

.

Remember the Freemasonic network that the Jews created and dominated? Well it was still fully operational under Communist China – contrary to what is often thought;

.

MASONRY & COMMUNIST CHINA – Hong Kong masonry website: “With the establishment of the People’s Republic of China, all the lodges continued to meet. The English District Grand Master of Northern China offered to close if the Central Peoples’ Government requested it, affirming that regular Freemasons always give obedience to the lawful government of whichever country they are in. No request was made and the British lodges meeting in the Masonic Hall in Beijing Road West in Shanghai continued to meet without difficulty” (84)

.

With that fact in mind, here is a probable Masonic connection to the highest level of the CCP:

.

Liu Shaoqi, First Vice Chairman of the Communist Party of China & Chairman of the People’s Republic of China 1959-1968 was also Jewish. In 1961 a book in Paris was published by a man named Hans Heinrich Wetzel. The book was called Liu Shao Chi (Le moine rouge). The book records a dialogue between Liu Shaoqi when he was a young boy with his great uncle Liu Tsofang. The uncle informs Liu Shaoqi that although young Liu was born in Hunan province, his family originated in “Sian-kiang” where:

.

“all the rich traders and bankers are the Jews…Your grandfather came to live in Hunan from Shansi, the northwestern Chinese province…Our ancestors lived in Henan. They inhabited Kaifeng, the capital. They were part of the ‘Ye-Se-Lo-Ni ‘ [Chinese word for Israelites or Israelis] or ‘Le-Khtze-Kin’ [cutters of veins], a name given because of their special methods for slaughtering cattle.” (85)

.

For an (incomplete) list of some additional Jews involved in Communist China under Mao, see footnote (86)

.

So as you can see, Jews were active in all levels of government under Mao. Now we will transition to who actually created the CCP & the early connections leaving no room for doubt that this was a Jewish conspiracy;

.

Grigorii Naumovitch Voitinsky was a bolshevik Jew who was a member of the Communist International, which was an international organization that advocated for world communism and it was controlled by the (Jewish) Soviet Union [see footnote 76]. He was sent over to China to become a senior advisor to (likely) crypto-Jew future CCP leaders Chen Duxiu and Li Dazhao. Voitinsky paved the way for the creation of the CCP.

.

Read an important excerpt from an academic paper written by a Jew:

.

“He was born as Grigorii Naumovitch Voitinsky to a Jewish family in Nevel, Russia, in 1893. In 1918, shortly after the Bolshevik Revolution, he joined the Communist Party in Vladivostok. In 1920 he became deputy director of the Comintern’s Far Eastern Bureau and left for China, where he met with Chen Duxiu and Li Dazhao, the future CCP leaders. Although Chen toyed with the Communist idea as early as 1918, he had also been attracted by other ideas (like federalism). It was only after he met Voitinsky that he became committed to Communism, not just in theory but also, and more important, in practice. It was following his meetings with Voitinsky that the first communist cells had been formed – at least seven in different cities and provinces, before the CCP was organized. Voitinski’s promotion of Marxist study groups not only paved the ground for the establishment of Party cells but also for distributing Marxist-Leninist knowledge that Chinese intellectuals had been lacking (Elleman, 2002; Chen, 2016; Lu, 2014). True, socialist and Marxist study groups had existed well before Voitniski’s arrival in China, but there is a huge gap between theoretical study clubs and an actually organized party. To organize a party, external professional support was needed. [Jewish] Comintern agents, headed by Voitinski, provided it.” (87)

.

Furthermore, “Many of the chief Soviet and Comintern missionaries in China were Jewish: Grigorii Naumovitch Voitinsky, Mikhail Borodin (Gruzenberg), Adolf Joffe, Pavel Mif, Nikolsky (Vladimir Abramovich Neumann [Neiman]) (Wilbur & How, 1989: 27-28; Abramov, 2005), Boris Zakharovich Shumiatsky, and a few others.” (88)

.

.

Another Jew who played a key role in the early stages of the development of Chinese communism, was a man named Cecil Frank Glass. He was a founder of the South African Communist Party and arrived in Shanghai in 1929. During his stay in China, he was the key man who united and consolidated the communists and revolutionaries that came about subsequent to the Shanghai coup d’état of Chiang Kai-Shek in April 1927. Because of this unity formed by this Jew, the Communist League of China was then founded shortly after in 1931. (89) Glass was also the “principal contact with the [Jewish] Trotskyist movement internationally.” (90)

.

Conclusion:

.

So all in all, the process of converting China to communism, from start to finish was managed by Jews & it is clear that they were sitting at the top of the CCP after raising them to power. With the understanding we have of the populous Chinese Jews, the Freemasonic network that was put in place over a century ago, AND the fact Jews were in key positions under Mao, it is only logical to conclude that many of the important positions in modern-day China are in fact Jews – and that includes Xi Jinping. [Evidence for Xi Jingping being a Crypto-Jew under footnote (91)]

.

With that in mind, as well as the following quote, I urge you to see these photos with the knowledge you now know, and it starts making perfect sense:

.

September 2000, Jewish Heritage Untouched in China –

.

“Most of the heritage left by Jewish people half a century ago still exists in China despite conclusions from Western scholars that it was destroyed after the founding of New China in 1949. A recent survey in Harbin, capital of northeast China’s Heilongjiang province, shows that hundreds of buildings, which were built by Jews in the early 20th century, such as banks, residences, shops, synagogues and beadhouses have not changed in appearance.

Chinese president Jiang Zemin who was visiting Israel said that Chinese and Jews have formed friendly ties since ancient times and that China will do its best to push forward the peace process in the Middle East.” (92)

.

.

(^ Pictured in Synagogue)

.

.

Sources:

.

1) Judeo-Persian letter https://blogs.bl.uk/asian-and-african/2020/06/an-eighth-century-judaeo-persian-letter-from-dandan-uiliq.html

2) Chinese Jewish Records Exhibited in New York https://www.jta.org/1926/04/02/archive/chinese-jewish-records-exhibited-in-new-york

.

.

3) Judaism in Asia since the Founding of the State of Israel https://bonndoc.ulb.uni-bonn.de/xmlui/bitstream/handle/20.500.11811/555/bup_10.pdf?sequence=4 (pg 262)

.

4) Jews & the Silk Route 200 BC https://bit.ly/3jru6gh

.

5) The Religious and Cultural Identity of a Kaifeng Jew in the Early Qing Dynasty–A Study of Zhao Yingcheng, a Famous Jew in Kaifeng https://web.archive.org/web/20070927212910/http://scholar.ilib.cn/Abstract.aspx?A=gzmzyj200506030

.

6) Itsvan Bakony – Chinese communism and chinese jews Library of political secrets 4 https://www.the-savoisien.com/blog/index.php?post/Istvan-Bakony-Chinese-communism-and-chinese-jews

.

7) A Jewish Spark Rekindled in China https://web.archive.org/web/20070114002328/http://kulanu.org/china/jewishspark.html

.

8) HISTORIC COMMUNITY OF KAIFENG, CHINA   https://web.archive.org/web/20170226015613/http://www.jewishtimesasia.org/kaifeng/261-kaifeng-communities/309-historic-community-of-kaifeng-china

.

9) Jews in Kaifeng, China: A Brief History https://web.archive.org/web/20120427031907/https://www.oakton.edu/user/2/friend/art_kaifhistory.html

.

10) THE LONG HISTORY OF CHINESE JEWS https://archive.jewishcurrents.org/the-long-history-of-chinese-jews/

.

11) The Sino-Judaic Studies: Kaifeng https://web.archive.org/web/20060206022116/http://www.sino-judaic.org/kaifeng2.html

.

12) THE JEWS OF CHINA https://www.google.ca/books/edition/The_Leisure_Hour/7PBMAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=with+the+characteristic+tenacity+that+distinguishes+the+Hebrew+race&pg=PA333&printsec=frontcover

.

13) JEWS IN CHINA – Historian Henry Hart Milman https://www.google.ca/books/edition/The_History_of_the_Jews_from_the_Earlies/qW40AAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=they+were+cultivated,+and+some+of+them,+according+to+existing+inscriptions,+have+been+highly+honored+by+the+imperial+will+and+have+obtained+the+rank+of+Mandarins.&pg=PA139&printsec=frontcover

14) The Kingship of Christ and The Conversion of the Jewish Nation by Rev. Denis Fahey, C.C.Sp. (Chap. V The Dual Citizenship of the Jews in Modern Times) http://traditionalcatholic.net/Tradition/Information/Conversion_of_Jewish_Nation/Chapter-V.html
.

15) Daryl B. Smith with Michael Collins Piper.

.

3 m 22 s – 26 m 20s Vol. 6: https://archive.org/details/OAA_2019_-_Miscellaneous_Material_Collection/%5BVol.+06%5D.mp3

.

16) (Source: “Gentile Reactions to Jewish Ideals”. New York edition, 1953, page 417)

.

17) Library of Political Secrets #4 – Chinese Communism and Chinese Jews (1969) https://archive.org/details/LibraryOfPoliticalSecrets4-ChineseCommunismAndChineseJews1969/page/n13/mode/2up?q=infiltrated+all+levels+in+China

.

18) A PEEK BACKWARDS INTO THE JEWISH COMMUNITY OF SHANGHAI http://www.sunray22b.net/Jews_in_Shanghai.pdf (pg 1)

.

19) The Jewish Community in Shanghai https://web.archive.org/web/20010218124628/http://www.babylonjewry.org.il/new/english/nehardea/10/m2.htm

.

20) Jews of Shanghai http://haruth.com/jw/China/s-jews.htm

.

21) How Jews once ran Shanghai, the ‘wicked old Paris of the East’ https://www.timesofisrael.com/how-jews-once-ran-shanghai-the-wicked-old-paris-of-the-east/

.

22) Schindler, Bruno, b. 1882 https://snaccooperative.org/view/26723475

.

.

23) Combining Contradictions: Jewish Contributions to the Chinese Revolution https://icsum.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/IJCS-112-1Yitzhak-for-website.pdf (pg 5)

.

24) Shanghai Had Large Jewish Community https://web.archive.org/web/20050403153856/http://haruth.com/AsiaShanghaiVisit1.htm

.

25) The Sephardi Jewish Community of Shanghai 1845-1939 and the Question of Identity https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/33901/1/11015626.pdf (pg 161)

.

26) Ibid. 160-161

.

27) Describes Growth of B’nai B’rith’s Shanghai Lodge https://www.jta.org/1930/06/29/archive/describes-growth-of-bnai-briths-shanghai-lodge

.

28) Warlord Era https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warlord_Era

.

29) CHINA’S BLOODY CENTURY http://hawaii.edu/powerkills/CHINA.CHAP1.HTM

30) September 1912, Chen was appointed the chief financial officer and head of the central audit office in Beijing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chen_Jintao#Financial_reforms_and_founding_Bank_of_China

.

31) Canton Central Bank https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Yat-sen#cite_ref-99

.

32) Jews in China https://berkovich-zametki.com/Nomer12/Kitaj1.htm

.

33) Jewish communities in China: from antiquity to modern times https://institute.eajc.org/eajpp-19/ (8th & last paras)

.

34) Jews in Kaifeng lucky https://www.google.ca/books/edition/The_Jewish_Chinese_Nexus/xfUl2vKpo2wC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=jews+in+kaifeng+were+lucky&pg=PA200&printsec=frontcover

.

35) Historiography of the Xinhai Revolution in the materials of the conference “Society and State in China” https://bit.ly/3hb9IP5

.

36) Chen Jiongming (next to the Freemason square and compass)

.

.

“This organization was one of the key supporters of Sun Yat-sen in his revolutionary efforts to overthrow the Qing dynasty.” (Jiongming created this party) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Zhi_Gong_Party]

.

37) LECHAIM Russian-Jewish magazine: Jews in China https://lechaim.ru/ARHIV/171/blomberg.htm

.

38) The Sephardi Jewish Community of Shanghai 1845-1939 and the Question of Identity https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/33901/1/11015626.pdf (pg 162)

.

39) David Crook https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Crook

.

40) Jewish Banker Jacob Schiff used Japan as a puppet to finance and to support Communist revolutionaries in Russia during the Russo-Japanese war. PART 1 https://gab.com/Muhareb1/posts/106002964564413017

.

41) CHEE KONG TONG: Chinese Freemasons https://www.bostonchinesefreemasons.org/chee-kong-tong

.

SUN YAT SEN LODGE N. 8

https://sunyatsenlodge.wordpress.com/

“Sun appears to have been active in at least one society commonly referred to as Chinese Freemasonry.”

https://freemasonry.bcy.ca/biography/sun_y/sun_y.html

.

Chinese researcher in video claiming Freemasons funded Sun Yat-Sen https://youtu.be/1BdfphQNg_A

.

.

42) Library of Political Secrets #4 – Chinese Communism and Chinese Jews (1969) https://archive.org/details/LibraryOfPoliticalSecrets4-ChineseCommunismAndChineseJews1969/page/n21/mode/2up

.

43) The Sephardi Jewish Community of Shanghai 1845-1939 and the Question of Identity https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/33901/1/11015626.pdf (pg 298)

44) Madame Sun Yat-Sen and Mao https://www.thestandard.com.hk/sections-news-print/222583/Fates-of-two-rich-families-hold-HK-hints

.

45) Combining Contradictions: Jewish Contributions to the Chinese Revolution https://icsum.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/IJCS-112-1Yitzhak-for-website.pdf (pg 6)

.

46) A HISTORY OF CHINESE PERCEPTIONS OF THE ‘JEWS’ AND JUDAISM https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/28636/1/10672796.pdf (pg 213)

.

47) Mikhail Borodin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Borodin

.

.

48) ⁨LaMerhav⁩ – ⁨למרחב⁩⁩, 1 July 1964 https://www.nli.org.il/en/newspapers/lmrv/1964/07/01/01/article/16/?e=——-en-20–1–img-txIN%7ctxTI————–1

.

49) “cohen of Canada” is Adviser to Sun Yat Sen https://www.jta.org/1923/02/19/archive/cohen-of-canada-is-adviser-to-sun-yat-sen

50) Cohen Two-Gun Cohen https://www.news1.co.il/Archive/0024-D-88598-00.html

51) Jewish Newspaper: The Observer, 6 March 1942 https://www.nli.org.il/ar/newspapers/hmf/1942/03/06/01/article/34/?e=——-ar-20–1–img-txIN%7ctxTI————–1

.

52) The Amazing Saga Of Two-Gun Cohen https://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/the-amazing-saga-of-two-gun-cohen/2012/08/30/0/

.

53) Chinese Democracy or Republicanism as it was known 100 years ago: Was it a good thing for China or was it just another Jewish Scam? https://joecanuck.wixsite.com/justice4chinese3/1911revolution-english-essay

54) Moshe Cohen becoming famous http://www.jwmww2.org/%D7%96%D7%99%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%AA_%D7%A1%D7%99%D7%9F

.

55) Two-Gun Cohen; Chinese Spy Master and a second Moishe! http://www.jwmww2.org/userfiles/file/TwoGunCohen.pdf

.

56) On the friendship path with China http://www.jewsofchina.org/JOC/userdata/SendFile.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&GID=89

.

57) Chinese Jews and China-Israel Relation https://www.scirp.org/pdf/chnstd_2014110510422088.pdf (pg 3)

.

58) The Extraordinary Adventures of Two-Gun Cohen https://asianjewishlife.org/images/issues/Issue12-June2013/PDFs/AJL-Issue12-Feature-two-gun.pdf (pg 5)

59) Direct link between top-Jewish family in China & Sun Yat-Sen: https://archive.ph/KDYVH#selection-2261.496-2261.853

60) Wedding of Chiang Kai-shek https://archive.ph/KDYVH#selection-2247.556-2247.779

61) Victor Sassoon chose to work with Chiang Kai-shek’s Kuomintang government https://www.thestandard.com.hk/sections-news-print/222583/Fates-of-two-rich-families-hold-HK-hints

62) Jewish sworn brother of President Chiang Kai-shek https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma_Fuxiang#cite_ref-128

.

.

63) China Gives Medals to 2 Shanghai Jews https://www.jta.org/1935/06/25/archive/china-gives-medals-to-2-shanghai-jews

64) Sassoon family bankrolled Chiang Kai-Shek KMT https://www.jacksonville.com/story/entertainment/books/2020/06/28/book-review-how-two-jewish-families-shaped-modern-china/41740643/

65) Jews selling holdings in-time (foreknowledge) (last para.) https://www.historynet.com/wartime-shanghai-a-tycoon-triumphs-over-the-emporer.htm

.

66) Combining Contradictions: Jewish Contributions to the Chinese Revolution https://icsum.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/IJCS-112-1Yitzhak-for-website.pdf (pg 9)

.

67) CHIANG FANG-LIANG Bio http://self.gutenberg.org/articles/Chiang_Fang-liang & The Lithuanian Jewish First Lady no one saw in the Republic of China https://findery.com/Chung123/notes/the-lithuanian-jewish-first-lady-no-one-saw-in-the-republic-of-china

.

68) Moscow Sun Yat-sen University https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow_Sun_Yat-sen_University

.

69) Book: Breath of Dragons (Russia, China and Jews) https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=110481&p=12 (ref. 142)

.

.

70) Silas Aaron Hardoon https://kehilalinks.jewishgen.org/shanghai/Hardoon.html & Mao’s landlord https://archive.ph/6BPPQ#selection-711.1-711.39

.

71) The Perestroika Deception: Behind the Mask – part II https://fitzinfo.net/2019/07/31/the-perestroika-deception-behind-the-mask-part-ii/

.

72) William F Buckley Skull and Bones society https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F._Buckley_Jr.#cite_ref-28

.

73) Memorial Service for William F. Buckley: Henry Kissinger, Christopher Buckley (2008)

74) Chinese Policy Towards Judaism Xu Xin Nanjing University [https://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Reln270/Judaism/XuXin-Chinese%20policy.pdf] (pg 3)

.

75) In the footsteps of the migrations of the Mizrahi Jews. https://blogs.7iskusstv.com/?p=52538

76) Jews took over Russia in 1917;

.

Scotland Yard Report to the America Secretary of State, July 23, 1919: There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international movement controlled by Jews; communications are passing between the leaders in America, France, Russia and England, with a view toward concerted action. [https://web.archive.org/web/20070625205254/https://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/jewishactivistscommunism.html]

.

.

77) Lack of opposition towards Jews and Zionists https://www.google.ca/books/edition/The_Jewish_Chinese_Nexus/xfUl2vKpo2wC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=lack+of+opposition+towards+jews+and+zionist&pg=PR18&printsec=frontcover

.

78) China and the Jewish People Old Civilizations in a New Era http://jppi.org.il/uploads/China%20and%20the%20Jewish%20People.pdf (pg 62)

.

79) Combining Contradictions: Jewish Contributions to the Chinese Revolution https://icsum.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/IJCS-112-1Yitzhak-for-website.pdf (pg 17)

.

80) Ibid. 17

81) The prominent Jewish Kadoorie family “maintained covert ties with the mainland https://archive.ph/KDYVH#selection-2381.185-2381.590

82) The Jewish Kadoorie’s meet with top Chinese leaders, including Xi Jingping regularly https://archive.ph/KDYVH#selection-2211.0-2218.1

83) Eisenberg arranged a secret meeting between Israel & China 1979 https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR2600/RR2641/RAND_RR2641.pdf (pg 12)

.

https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1991/eirv18n48-19911213/eirv18n48-19911213_046-israel_makes_china_connection_of.pdf

.

84) FREEMASONRY IN CHINA http://zetlandhall.com/history/china

85) Hans-Heinrich Wetzel, Liu Shao Chi: le moine rouge [Paris: Editions Denoel, 1961], pp. 30. [QUOTED IN: The Virginia Review of Asian Studies Volume 5 2003]

.

https://bit.ly/3ym5hq7

.

“[The Jewish community] were formerly called the “Ye-Se-Lo-Ni”

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaifeng#Communaut%C3%A9_juive

.

86) Additional Jews involved under Mao

.

(Ma Haide was the first foreigner to be granted citizenship in the People’s Republic of China – https://archive.is/5q4kb#selection-433.116-433.197 ; He was of Syrian Jewish extraction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma_Haide#cite_ref-2)

.

Asia’s Jews (LIST) https://moishekohen.wordpress.com/2017/12/14/asias-jews/

.

87) Combining Contradictions: Jewish Contributions to the Chinese Revolution https://icsum.org.my/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/IJCS-112-1Yitzhak-for-website.pdf (pg 7)

88) Ibid. 4-5

89) Cecil Frank Glass Jewish communist

.

(Source: Prophets Unarmed: Chinese Trotskyists in Revolution, War, Jail, and the Return from Limbo. Edited by Gregor Benton)

.

(Source: Jewish Identities in East and Southeast Asia. Written by Jonathon Goldstein)

.

“He helped found the Communist League in China and was its principal contact with the Trotskyist movement internationally. He went to meet Trotsky in Coyoacan on August 11, 1937, and he discussed China and Wang Fanxi’s analysis of the situation with LDT.” https://www.marxists.org/archive/glass/biog/biog.htm

.

90) BIBLIOGRAPHY: Frank Glass https://www.marxists.org/archive/glass/biog/biog.htm

91) Xi Jinping Crypto-Jew evidence

.

“Mr. Xi’s father, Xi Zhongxun, then governor of Guangdong province and an advocate of opening China’s economy, was “warm, open and flexible,” said [Jew] Jan Berris, vice president of the committee, who traveled with him [in America].” https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/projects/cp/reporters-notebook/xi-jinping-visit/xi-father-united-states

.

>

.

Xi is pictured above with the Jew Terry Branstad.

.

More recent ;

.

.

“Chinese officials were quick to praise Branstad as an “old friend.”

“Branstad and Xi met frequently, mostly during trade missions”

https://web.archive.org/web/20171025075221/https://www.businessinsider.com/terry-branstad-xi-jinping-china-ambassador-2016-12

.

92) Jewish Heritage Untouched in China http://en.people.cn/english/200009/27/eng20000927_51370.html

By The Jamestown Foundation
April 24, 1997 Anno Domini

By Belt and Road News
July 9, 2021 Anno Domini

As China becomes an indispensable part of the global economy, relations with the Asian Country will bolster Serbia’s Development, Serbian Ruling Party Leaders said here on Tuesday.

President Aleksandar Vucic, also President of the Ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS), made the remarks at the Communist Party of China (CPC) and World Political Parties Summit via video link.

The video summit, which gathered the CPC and parties from more than 160 countries and organisations around the world, was attended in Belgrade by SNS party leaders, Chinese Ambassador of Serbia Chen Bo, and some 300 SNS party members.

The theme of the summit is “For the People’s Wellbeing: the Responsibility of Political Parties.”

Vucic congratulated China on the 100th anniversary of the CPC’s founding, and praised its achievements for the Chinese people and the international community.

He said that today’s gathering, initiated by the CPC, “testifies to the consciousness and responsibility of that party for jointly facing challenges in the world.”

Calling the CPC “a great guarantee of multilateralism in political and economic relations between sovereign states,” Vucic pointed out that China’s transformation has become an inspiration and brought hope far beyond Chinese borders.

Vucic said the Belt & Road Initiative ensures key preconditions for balanced development and global stability, which is why “Serbia is proud as one of the main carriers and partners of China in Southeast Europe in realising that idea.”

Deputy President of the SNS party Aleksandar Sapic said that Serbia is proud to be among China’s closest and most reliable partners in this region.

Sapic said that the development of the Serbian economy would be unthinkable without Chinese investment, not to mention the difficulties Serbia faced during the COVID-19 crisis. China was the first to help, he added.

“This is a confirmation of long-term strategic cooperation with the People’s Republic of China. The fact that we are its closest and most reliable partner in this part of Europe puts us on the right track, and we believe that this cooperation will become even deeper and better,” Sapic said.

By Timothy Fitzpatrick

Author-turned Eurasian guest of honour E. Michael Jones completely failed at trying to dismiss last month the claim that he is a KGB asset aiding the demise of the West.

Jones attempted to dismiss the claim (made by researcher Andy Sloan on this site) using a strawman argument during a live chat on Restoring the Faith, March 6, 2021.

“Someone is now spreading this ridiculous, preposterous claim that I am a KGB agent because I was in a room with Aleksandr Dugin,” Jones declared. He went on, “I am in the unfortunate position of being unable to prove a negative. I cannot prove that I am not a KGB agent, so the burden of proof lies on these people, these character assassinations (sic) who are launching this in the first place. I was at a conference in Tehran with Dugin…he gave a speech about multi-polarity. I offered an objection to that that speech saying we lived in some sense a uni-polar world, even if it’s not the United States of America that’s head of it. That was the extent of our discussion. This Internet breeds character assassination and this is one example of it.”

First off, Sloan’s article in no way based his claim merely on the fact that Jones was in the same room with Dugin (on multiple occasions, by the way). Jones then follows his strawman argument with a challenge of burden of proof, which Sloan did thoroughly provide. Jones addressed none of the many, many pieces of evidence written by Sloan. Did he even read it or is he deceiving his audience about the breadth of evidence?

Jones then claims he offered an objection to Dugin’s speech about multi-polarity. But he didn’t really offer an objection, though. He merely stated what he perceives as the current world geopolitical reality—that it is unipolar. Furthermore, Jones completely fails to discern (deliberately?) Dugin’s meaning of multi-polarity, which is really just jargonous deception to distract from the fact that Dugin wants his Eurasian union to rule the world as a unipolar, neo-Bolshevik empire (world government). To achieve this, the Eurasianists have to break the West’s seemingly unipolar rule using an appeal to the West’s enemies to engage in multi-polarism (divesting from the West) and embracing the East (Eurasianism, Belt and Road initiative). If Jones genuinely can’t understand this, then he is unfit to be a geopolitical analyst, especially as a self-appointed representative of the Catholic Church and the United States of America. Even Glenn Beck’s audience have a better understanding of Dugin’s deceptive language than does Jones, and Beck’s audience could be classified as “normies”.

At worst, Sloan is correct and Jones is a KGB asset wittingly distorting the evidence. Either way, Jones is carrying out the neo-Soviet Eurasianists’ objective of distorting the East’s true intentions as well as blaming the West for what is really Eastern subversion of it. While Jones does seem free, in his apparent KGB mission, to criticize world Jewry, he flat out denies Jewry’s subdivisions: subversion by freemasonry and Soviet communist threat.

“…communism was never a threat, in general.” —Jones

This is in addition to Jones being a race denialist (except when non-whites are he subject), denial of communism as a still-present threat, soft on Vatican II and its “popes”, outright heretical statements concerning Islam, propping up of Putin as an anti-globalist renegade, and associations with numerous Eurasianists and socialists, like Israel Shamir and Dugin—all Soviet-friendly narratives.

Jones has become so blatant with his agenda, I have had to create a dossier just to catalogue it all. The guy smacks of shill. It’s becoming more and more plain.

(Editor’s note: For more on Trump, Arif, and Sater, see Part IV of my Trump series.)

By Compromat.group
Dec. 19, 2019 Anno Domini
Translated from the Russian

He is the owner of the Bayrock Group, which Donald Trump and Felix Sater used to launder money and finance. When Trump was unable to secure funding for his projects from other sources, due to numerous bankruptcies and debts, he turned to his friend Arif. Arif was born in the USSR and worked for the USSR Ministry of Trade for 17 years before finding his niche as a member of a crime syndicate. Arif is a major donor to Felix Sater’s home synagogue in Port Washington.

In 2010, Arif was arrested aboard the $ 60 million luxury yacht Savarona. On board, the authorities found underage girls from Russia and Ukraine who were used to sexually serve wealthy clients at prices ranging from $3,000 to $10,000. A year later, Arif was acquitted by a Turkish court along with six other defendants. Four, however, were convicted, but with a suspended sentence. Bloomberg reported that those arrested included Russian, Kyrgyz and Kazakh businessmen and government officials. The Israeli press revealed that among those arrested on the yacht were Kazakh-Israeli billionaire Alexander Mashkevich (a member of the World Jewish Congress), Russian-Jewish businessman Telman Ismailov and senior assistant to the Prime Minister of Kazakhstan Karim Massimov.

The Israeli press wrote about Arif: “The investigation began several months before the police raid on the yacht. The Turkish police received information about a criminal organization engaged in human trafficking and extortion. The organization is headed, according to information, by Turkish tycoon Tevfik Arif, a business partner of Donald Trump and owner of a metal production plant in Kazakhstan and many other enterprises in the United States and Great Britain. Arif, who received the name “David” from his people, was born in Kazakhstan and has been living in Turkey since 1994.

Police monitored his organization for two months, documented the facts with video cameras, tapped telephones and hacked e-mail and bank accounts. Investigation materials show that Arif’s organization provided escort services to businessmen. Young women, some of whom were minors (according to the investigation, one of the businessmen was especially fond of 13-14 year olds, and the head of the organization supplied girls to clients), were brought from Russia and Ukraine through modeling agencies. ” Mashkevich denied that he was on the yacht during the search, but Turkish law enforcement officials claim that they have evidence, in the form of receipts, with which Mashkevich paid for the yacht rental in advance within five days.

But the most interesting thing is that this particular yacht was chartered by Doddy Al-Fayet and Princess Diana for their romantic voyages, which once again proves the fact that they were under the control of Chabad and the Mossad. And even more interestingly, the first owner of this yacht was the first president of Turkey, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, Mashkevich, through his Eurasian Group and Bayrock LLC, finances Trump’s real estate projects.

After his arrest on Arif’s yacht in the company of underage girls, Mashkevich was awarded a Torah scroll at the Chabad Russian Center of South Florida.

Sex scandals: Alexander Mashkevich and Telman Ismailov on Ataturk’s yacht

Turkish newspapers and television are bursting with indignation, the Turkish public is in shock, and the police are seriously afraid of riots: the country has spread the news that a historical landmark, the personal yacht of the founder of the state, Mustafa Kemal Pasha Ataturk, has turned … into a floating brothel.

Last Tuesday, in a lazy afternoon, several dozen members of a special detachment of the Turkish police suddenly landed on the deck of the Savarona. The raid, as reported by the police department of the Mediterranean port city of Göcek, on the roadstead of which the yacht was at that time, was carried out as part of an operation to combat pimping and prostitution. And in fact – together with Tevfik Arif and his very high-ranking guests, ten girls, as they say, “model appearance”, citizens of Russia and Ukraine, fell into the hands of the law enforcement officers, and only two of them were 18 years old – the rest were much younger …

There is also no reason to argue about their duties on board: despite the daytime, all passengers at the time of their arrest were in their cabins, in beds with the mentioned girls. And they themselves did not at all deny that they were on the yacht not as guests of a hospitable host, but as personnel hired through various modeling agencies. According to preliminary data of the Turkish police, a night of close communication with them cost the invitees to “rest” in the amount of three to ten thousand dollars.

Tevfik Arif, better known in the post-Soviet space as Tofik Arifov, was the first in the field of view of Turkish law enforcement agencies, and then of publications from this country. According to the extremely scarce information that occasionally leaks into the press, he has a very “interesting” past.

According to the media and the Internet, in the late 80s and early 90s of the last century, an Uzbek businessman of Turkish origin was considered one of the pillars of the criminal world. Allegedly, it was Tofik who was the “godfather” of the notorious founders of the Trans World Group, brothers Lev and Mikhail Chernykh.

They also say that he actively helped the formation of the “Eurasian troika” headed by Alexander Mashkevich, who allegedly in gratitude for the services rendered made a lot of efforts so that in the mid-90s Mr. Arifov acquired a passport of a citizen of Kazakhstan more reliable for entrepreneurial activity.

By the early 2000s, the roads of Tofik Arifov and the Cherny brothers diverged in different directions, but the Turkish-Uzbek-Kazakh multi-billionaire never interrupted contacts with Alexander Mashkevich.

From publications in the Russian press, it is known that Alexander Antonovich was usually listed among the guests of honor at events organized by Tofik Arifov. This was the case, for example, in 2005, when Arif presented another hotel of the Rixos chain in the Turkish town of Belek, which he co-owns, according to some sources, along with one of the candidates for the Nobel Prize from Kazakhstan.

Accordingly, when information appeared in the Turkish media about the detention in the framework of the case of organizing a brothel aboard the landmark for Turkey yacht Tofig Arif, it became obvious that very soon Aleksandr Mashkevich would be “spotted” in the growing scandal.

And so it happened.

According to media reports, orgies were organized on the yacht, in which underage girls from Russia and Ukraine took part. Among those implicated in the scandal, the Turkish press names Russian businessman Telman Ismailov, Kazakh billionaire Alexander Mashkevich, as well as a man who introduced himself as “an assistant to the Prime Minister of Kazakhstan” …

The Turkish newspaper “Hurriyet” claims that Mashkevich paid for the lease of the vessel for five days. Among the suspects in the sexual scandal on the yacht is an adviser to the Kazakh prime minister, designated in this message by the initials PS. A night with a young priestess of love cost each of the participants in the orgy in the amount of $3,000 to $10,000, the article says.

The newspaper “Yediot Ahronot” continues to cover the “Turkish sex scandal” involving the president of the Euro-Asian Jewish Congress (EAJC), Kazakh tycoon and holder of Israeli citizenship, Alexander Mashkevich. On October 8, this publication reported, citing anonymous sources “connected” with the incident, that Mashkevich not only paid for the rental of Kemal Ataturk’s historic yacht “Savarona” to hold orgies there, but was allegedly even detained on board by the Turkish police.

He immediately hired a large Turkish law firm and was soon released on bail, the newspaper said. However, it is noted that this information has not yet received official confirmation. Those close to Mashkevich do not comment on these messages in any way, but the World Jewish Congress (WJC) allegedly demanded explanations from him regarding such publications. And anonymous sources in the VEK told reporters that if it turns out that Mashkevich is really involved in a sex scandal, he will have to leave all official posts.

“Yediot Ahronot” adds that, according to Turkish media reports, on the yacht “Savarona”, along with prostitutes from Ukraine and Russia, prominent businessmen and even politicians from the post-Soviet space were detained. Among them were allegedly the Russian billionaire Telman Ismailov and a certain “assistant to the head of the government of Kazakhstan.”

The raid on Ataturk’s yacht has already caused a powerful political scandal in Turkey. “I gave the necessary orders to ban the lease of a yacht,” Turkish Finance Minister Mehmet Shimsek said in connection with the incident. According to him, now the yacht should be transferred to the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Culture.

“If the company does not agree with the refusal to lease, we will go to court to revoke the license,” he added.

A member of the Turkish parliament, Mehmet Sevigen, demanded that the Ministry of Culture immediately return the status of a museum to the yacht.

“The scandal with prostitutes on the yacht is a blatant desecration of the memory of Ataturk,” the indignant parliamentarian concluded.

In the meantime, as already mentioned, this roundup caused a political scandal in Turkey, comparable only to a 12-point earthquake. Brothels in this Muslim country are somehow banned, but the fact that Kemal Ataturk’s personal yacht was turned into a brothel turned this whole story into a powerful time bomb.

It is known that the Turks are taught to honour the name of the founder of the state from an early age: the name of Ataturk is a kind of icon for Turkey, no less sacred than the name of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin was for the Soviet Union. So now the Turkish authorities, who have come to their senses, are trying to show their indignation and desire immediately, right on the spot, to sort it out and punish all those involved.

Trump’s business partner Tevfik Arif turns Ataturk’s yacht into a brothel

Turkish police have detained a yacht lessee that once belonged to the founder of the state, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. The current interim owner of the $60 million ship is accused of organizing a brothel for the rich, The Daily Mail writes. It turns out that sex orgies were held on his yacht, in which underage girls from Russia and Ukraine took part. The millionaire himself, according to some reports, in the past was an ordinary Soviet employee in the Ministry of Trade.

The 57-year-old New York real estate tycoon Tevfik Arif was in custody. Moreover, according to some reports, the yacht’s lessee introduced himself as a “Kazakh businessman”, and a man who identified himself as “an assistant to the Prime Minister of Kazakhstan” was detained along with him, “Diapazon” reports.

The police raid on the yacht Savarona was arranged last Tuesday as part of an operation to combat pimping and prostitution. At that moment, the ship was in the roadstead of the Mediterranean port of Gocek. Together with the millionaire, 10 alleged prostitutes from Russia and Ukraine fell into the hands of the police. All of them were very young girls—models, and only two of them came of age.

The girls were recruited to work on the ship through foreign modeling agencies.

According to police, the clients of the “floating brothel” were the most demanding and wealthy lovers of sex without obligations, who laid out three to 10 thousand dollars per night on board a 137-meter yacht, Infox.ru reports.

The luxury ship has 16 rooms, a gangway with 282 golden steps, a cinema room, a Turkish bath and a helicopter landing pad. Moreover, the yacht Savarona has a rich history: in the last century it was the floating residence of the first ruler of the Republic of Turkey—the legendary Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. The President used it until his death in 1938.

According to Bloomberg, prominent businessmen and officials from Russia, Kyrgyzstan, and Kazakhstan were detained during the police raid.

According to the head of the police special forces, whose fighters suddenly landed from a helicopter on the deck of the yacht at lunchtime, all the guests at that moment were caught in their beds. Moreover, the police found dozens of condoms in each issue. In the evening, Arif gave his first testimony at the Belek police station.

According to Arif’s lawyer Engin Agyuzlu, his client simply fell victim to a smear campaign. He also expressed confidence that the millionaire will be able to defend his good name in any independent court.

It is known that Tevfik Arif has business ties with Donald Trump through his company Bayrock Group, which, in particular, built the 46-storey Trump SoHo hotel and restaurant complex and Trump International Hotel in New York.

According to Real Estate Weekly, Tevfik Arif was born in the USSR, on the territory of modern Kazakhstan. For 17 years he worked in the Ministry of Trade of the Soviet Union.

In 2001, Arif creates his own company Bayrock Group. He currently owns a luxurious three-story mansion worth $6-million in New York. It is located in Port Washington (Long Island).

The yacht “Savarona” was built in 1931 by the American engineer William Francis Gibbs and sailed in the Atlantic and the Mediterranean for 7 years, after which in 1938 she was bought by the Turkish government and transferred to the founder of the republic Ataturk. Meetings of the government cabinet, receptions of leaders of foreign countries were held here. And after the death of Ataturk, the ship was transferred to the maritime administration. In 1989 it was rented by Kahraman Sadykoglu for 49 years.

Soviet tycoon arrested in Turkey for turning Ataturk’s yacht into a floating brothel with Russian models

Turkish police have detained a yacht lessee that once belonged to the founder of the state, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. The current interim owner of the $60-million ship is accused of organizing a brothel for the rich, The Daily Mail writes. It turns out that sex orgies were held on his yacht, in which underage girls from Russia and Ukraine took part. The millionaire himself, according to some reports, in the past was an ordinary Soviet employee in the Ministry of Trade.

The 57-year-old New York real estate tycoon Tevfik Arif was in custody. Moreover, according to some reports, the yacht’s lessee introduced himself as a “Kazakh businessman”, and a man who identified himself as “an assistant to the Prime Minister of Kazakhstan” was detained along with him, “Diapazon” reports.

The police raid on the yacht Savarona was arranged last Tuesday as part of an operation to combat pimping and prostitution. At that moment, the ship was in the roadstead of the Mediterranean port of Gocek. Together with the millionaire, 10 alleged prostitutes from Russia and Ukraine fell into the hands of the police. All of them were very young female models, and only two of them reached the age of majority (18 years old).

The girls were recruited to work on the ship through foreign modeling agencies.

By Fronda Quarterly No. 11-12
March 1998 Anno Domini
Translated from the Polish

Question and Answer session with Grzegorz Górny and Putin’s Prophet Aleksandr Dugin (answers in quotations):

Aleksander Dugin: I am waiting for Ivan the Terrible

– Students of the Diplomatic Academy in Moscow, whom I talked to, told me that the reading they were given during the classes, i.e. your book Fundamentals of geopolitics, was the most remembered chapter devoted to sacred geography. In Poland, I have not met anyone who would deal with this issue.Could you please tell us what place Poland occupies in sacred geography?

– I have never dealt specifically with the case of Poland, although its place is very specific. After all, this is the north of Eurasia, an important region of the pre-Christian Slavic region, the Baltic Sea basin. Regarding the archetypes of sacred geography, I would like to point out two things.

First of all, in the Orthodox reality there is a synergy between the pre-Christian and Christian world models, which overlap homologously, without conflicts. Different figures and phenomena from different orders overlap painlessly and even harmoniously. In the case of Poland, there is a much more conflicting relationship between these two models, and this is due to Catholicism, which is a tradition completely different from that of Orthodoxy. René Guenon clearly separates tradition from religion. Tradition is a broader concept than religion. Orthodoxy is a tradition, Catholicism is a religion. Tradition is able to absorb elements of other religious beliefs without conflict. Religion, on the other hand, comes into conflict with other beliefs. It is related to a different historical experience of the Eastern and Western Churches after the Great Schism. For the West was not always purely religious, Catholic, there was a period when it was more traditional, Orthodox. After the great schism, however, Catholicism departed from tradition and narrowed down to religion. This is at least our Byzantine version.

How does this relate to sacred geography? Well, in our understanding, the West, understood as a territory where Catholicism and Protestantism dominate, is in an opposite relationship to religious norms and elements. Of course, there are many elements of other religions in the West, but they conflict with the Catholic religion. Institutions that deal with sacred geography or remnants of pre-Christian traditions in the West, after the Great Schism, were relegated to autonomous spheres – to magic, esotericism, hermetic orders. In Orthodoxy, such a split did not take place.

In this context, Poland is on the border between the Catholic and Orthodox worlds. From my Eurasian point of view, the archetype of Poland’s sacred geography is deeply dualistic: on the one hand, a pre-Christian, pagan, magical, heterodox tradition whose roots remain Slavic; on the other – German-Roman Catholicism. There is a conflict between them. The situation of Poland is a borderline one. She cannot unite with the Eastern world religiously, and with the Western ethnically. In geopolitics, Poland remains part of the sanitary cordon separating the Eurasian continent into two parts, which is very convenient for the Anglo-Saxon anti-traditional forces. Poland cannot fully realize its Eurasian-Slavic essence, because it is hindered by Catholicism, nor by its Western European identity, because its own Slavic character, i.e. language, customs, archetypes, climate of places, etc. Poland is always falling victim to the Third Force, as is today’s mondialism and Atlanteanism. Due to this location on the border between Russia and Germany, the problem of the partitions of Poland between the East and the West will always occur in history. It is the result of this sacral-geographic and geopolitical duality. As Toynbee noted, the attempt to build an independent Polish-Lithuanian civilization between these two forces ended in failure. Central European civilization is too weak to withstand the tension between East and West. The countries of this region have to define themselves: either here or there. Polish-Lithuanian civilization did not want to or could not define itself, therefore it had to disappear. It is indeed a dramatic situation.

• Are there any elements in the Polish tradition that you find attractive?

I am definitely closer to the Slavic-Eurasian sources of Polishness, their ethnic and even pagan elements. I am attracted to certain eastern or oriental elements, the culture of minorities. I think the best thing in Polish history is the Jewish tradition in small towns in eastern Poland. Actually, I am interested in everything that was anti-Catholic in Poland: Polish freemasons and occultists, Jan Potocki and Hoene-Wroński, Mienżyński and Dzerzhinsky … They all chose the Eurasian path.

• You are talking about Poland’s position between the East and the West, that is, between Russia and Germany. Meanwhile, many scholars emphasize the greater similarity of Germany, and especially Prussia, to Russia than to England or Spain. Feliks Koneczny even believed that Prussia, like Russia, belonged to the Byzantine and not Latin civilization.

Koneczny was right. Germany is internally divided. Bavaria tends to the West, Prussia to the East. Prussia is such a small Russia inside Germany.

• We have always seen this as the greatest danger for us: a friendly alliance between Germany and Russia.

That’s our job. Unite with Germany and create a powerful continental bloc.

• What about Poland then?

We, the Russians and Germans, understand in terms of expansion and we will never reason otherwise. We are not simply interested in preserving our own state or nation. We are interested in absorbing, through our pressure, the maximum number of categories that complement us. We are not interested in colonizing like the English, but in drawing our strategic geopolitical boundaries without even special Russification, although there should be some Russification. Russia, in its geopolitical and sacral-geographic development, is not interested in the existence of an independent Polish state in any form. It is also not interested in the existence of Ukraine. Not because we don’t like Poles or Ukrainians, but because these are the laws of sacred geography and geopolitics.

Poland has to choose: either Slavic or Catholic identity. I understand it’s hard to separate one from the other, but it’s inevitable. Hitler also could not fight on two fronts, he had to choose: either with England against Russia or with Russia against England, as Haushofer advised him. But Hitler did not want to choose. “I don’t want to tear myself apart, I want to remain myself,” he said, and started a war on two fronts. It plunged Germany, 20 million Russians, and a good chunk of the world. For what? That McDonalds would now open their bars in Berlin, that the Soviet Union would collapse and that NATO soldiers were stationed everywhere. The identity of Germany was so important to Hitler at the time that he did not want to make a choice. In the same way, Poland has to choose, identity is not important. If Poland insists on keeping its identity, it will turn everyone hostile towards itself and will once again become a zone of conflict.

There are nations that can expand to the size of civilization. They then lose their identity, race, and sometimes even language, but that is a risk that must be taken if you want to be an empire. This is the United States, this is Russia. Poland was unable to create its own civilization and must make a choice. I think there is still a possibility for you to make your normal choice, i.e. Byzantine. It requires a lot of courage, nonconformity, unusual forms of action, some skinheads, anarchists, mystics. Polish chaos against the Polish order.

• In a word, from your point of view, all anti-Catholic activities in Poland are beneficial?

Exactly. You have to break Catholicism from the inside, strengthen Polish Freemasonry, support decaying secular movements, promote heterodox and anti-papal Christianity. Catholicism cannot be absorbed into our tradition unless it is deeply reoriented in a nationalist and anti-papal direction. If there was a lodge in Poland like the Irish Golden Dawn, whose leaders, such as William Butler Yeats or Maud Gonne, on the one hand were Catholics, and on the other – fanatical occultists inspired by Celtic culture, then one can have some hope. Such people could decompose Catholicism from within and reorient it towards a more heterodox, even esoteric. Anyway, my friends in Poland tell me that there are groups with you, related to telemism or the achievements of Alistair Crowley.

• Frankly speaking, the opinion that is more widespread in Poland is that if there are forces decomposing Catholicism in Poland, they are closer to the West than the East.

As I said, you find yourself between two clashing blocks, two civilization concepts: Eurasianism and Atlantism, which wants to create a New World Order, i.e. a civilization devoid of tradition, sacrum, metaphysics.

• If this is how the New World Order is presented in Poland, it is almost always added that only Catholicism can be a salvation from total secularization.

Catholicism cannot be a guarantee of defense against the New World Order, because it is a transition stage to this order. I do not believe in such an evolution and such a mutation of Catholicism that it could acquire a Eurasian character. What can we hide a lot … I am not like Ziuganow, who promises every lame orphan on the road something pleasant. Poland is in a tragic geopolitical situation. Both they (ie the New World Order) and we (Eurasians) want to deprive you of your Catholicism. Our offer is better, however, because with us you will at least be able to develop and realize your Slavic identity. So the less influential the pro-Eastern forces in the anti-Catholic lobby, the more tragic your situation becomes. I do hope, however, that you will have forces leaning towards Eurasianism, maybe there will be some synthesis between the extreme right and the extreme left. It is a pity that communism in Poland has never been esoteric, as in Russia …

• Before the war, there was actually only one significant representative of mystical-Gnostic communism in the KPP, Jan Hempel, the author of the Volkist Piast Sermons.

So maybe more hopes should be attached to your extreme right. If your national current broke away from liberalism and turned towards paganism, it would naturally gravitate towards the East. There was, after all, the phenomenon of the anti-Catholic and pagan “Zadruga” before the war.

• What you say reminds me of what I read recently about Russian Christianity. Some of the historians of religion believe that Russia was never thoroughly Christianized, that Christianity was adopted very superficially, and pagan beliefs and customs were still alive among the majority of the common people.

It all depends on what we call Christianity. Orthodoxy and Christianity are two different things. When you say “Christianity”, you mean Catholicism or something analogous to Catholicism. Meanwhile, Orthodoxy is defined as non-Catholicism. So if Catholicism is Christianity, then Orthodoxy is non-Christian. Conversely, if we are Christians, you are not. I am relying not only on the claims of our fathers after the great schism, but also on the eighth and ninth-century authorities such as Photius. Orthodoxy, which is not a religion but a tradition, is much closer to what we call paganism. It embraces and includes paganism. The teaching of the Cappadocian or Palamite Fathers does not completely conflict with pagan norms, but only transforms pre-Christian archetypes in Orthodox contexts. Orthodoxy is more than a religion, both vertically, because it includes paganism, and horizontally, because it is open to metaphysics, which has completely disappeared in post-school Catholicism. Orthodoxy and Catholicism are two completely separate phenomena, tradition and religion are like a whole and a part. Therefore, it is not possible to unite Orthodoxy and Catholicism.

• Specialists in ecumenical dialogue emphasize that between Catholicism and Protestantism, cultural and civilization differences are minimal, but dogmatically there is a gap between them. The situation is different with Catholicism and Orthodoxy: dogmatic differences are small, while cultural and civilizational differences are huge.

Werner Sombarth, developing the theses of Max Weber, stated that not only Protestantism, but also Catholicism was at the source of capitalism. Catholicism with its filioque and the idea of ​​individual salvation. The idea of ​​individual salvation is not a Christian thought, but a typically Catholic one. There is no such concept in Orthodoxy. There is no concept of a unit at all. In Orthodox anthropology the word individual does not appear. As we know, anthropology is the basis for the construction of the entire social system, the entire civilization model. Sombarth believed that Catholic anthropology assumed a specific development of socio-economic relations because it attached great importance to the concept of individuality. Orthodox anthropology, in turn, always emphasized the supra-individual personality. Man then sees himself as part of a larger whole. Therefore, he does not save himself, but someone saves through him. In Catholicism, a man is an individual, and therefore an indivisible whole, in Orthodoxy, a man is a dividum, an individual, and therefore divisible. In Catholicism, man is a finite being, he is responsible for himself – to God, to people, etc. Protestantism has made this conviction even more holistic. In Orthodoxy, a person is part of the Church, a part of the community organism, just like a leg. So how can a person be responsible for himself? Can the leg be responsible for itself? This is where the idea of ​​the state, the total state, comes from. Therefore, the Russians, because they are Orthodox, can be true fascists, unlike artificial Italian fascists like Gentile or the Hegelians there. The real Hegelianism is Ivan Pereswietow – the man who invented the oprichnina for Ivan the Terrible in the 16th century. It was the real founder of Russian fascism. He formulated the thesis that the state is everything and the individual is nothing. The state is salvation, the state is the Church. It is enough to read the writings of our Orthodox saint, Józef of Wołokołamsk, to see that these two organisms are identical, identical. And now this whole organism for salvation, all strive for salvation without crumbling, like one collective soul, one collective body.

• Indeed, in Orthodoxy you have a certain inclination towards apocatastasis, towards the idea of universal salvation …

This is true. The most important thing is that we have no individuality. The individual dissolves into the collective. This is how the Russian works for salvation.

• Whose salvation?

The salvation of the archetype, the salvation of Adam. Through the state, the Russians are striving to save not themselves, but Adam …

• Adam Kadmon, it sounds cabbalistic.

No, this is a holistic approach. In Orthodoxy, it is about the salvation of the Old Testament Adam through the coming of the new Adam, i.e. Christ, nature, while nature is saved through people. The state, especially the holy state, is the instrument of this salvation. That is why the Russian Tsar is an active participant in the mystery of soteriology. After the fall of Byzantium, he became the last guardian of the catechon, a tradition which Charlemagne turned out to be usurper at the turn of the 8th and 9th centuries. It was the Byzantine emperor who was the true emperor of both East and West.

• I have come across the claim that the real split between East and West took place not in 1054 when the Great Schism occurred, nor in 1204 when the Crusaders ravaged Constantinople, but on Christmas 800 when Pope Leo III he put an imperial crown on the head of Charlemagne.

It was a usurpation. Therefore, the imperial function of the West, whether under the Stauffenbergs or the Habsburgs, was always questionable. Because an ecumen can only have one emperor. One of them must be false. According to all the norms of orthodoxy, such a sacred anointed figure, regardless of any negative personal character traits, was the Byzantine emperor, and after the fall of Constantinople, the Russian Tsar. It can be said that all Western philosophy and culture arose from rejecting and ignoring the Byzantine tradition. In the West, the Orthodox version of Christianity or metaphysics is not taken into account at all, it is treated as if it did not exist.

• I think that if in the last millennium there was a process of increasing separation between Catholicism and Orthodoxy, it was a bilateral process. Orthodoxy also isolated itself from Catholicism.

That’s right, but the point is, only one side can be right. If Catholicism is right, then neither Russia nor Serbia have any reason to exist, culture should be Americanized and Protestant, because this is the right direction of development. After all, Protestantism is a child of Catholicism, disgusting, I admit, and obnoxious, but legitimate. So if Orthodoxy is wrong, then one should choose the Protestant way and, as in the Church of England, vote that there is no hell. The right, however, is on the side of Orthodoxy, which remains the most perfect form of traditionalism, sacredness and conservatism. In the beginning, there was East and West. East is paradise, fullness, West is exile, nothingness. Eastern empire – legitimate, western – apostatic. These aren’t just archetypes. There is a great struggle going on between Byzantium and Rome, Russia and the West, Eurasianism and Atlanticism, socialism and capitalism, barbarism and civilization. We do not represent civilization, but culture. We all – Russians, Serbs, Tatars, etc. – represent the barbarian element. Barbarism is life, it is the sacred world of tradition. We live in shacks, beat drums, drink vodka, and we are attacked by Daniel Bell, postmodernism, post-Protestant information society, the New World Order. In this great clash of Atlantic civilization and Eurasian culture, all that lies between us – Poland, Ukraine, Central Europe, and, who knows, maybe even Germany – must disappear, be absorbed.

• Samuel Huntington in his Clash of Civilizations writes that states that are hybrids of two civilizations have no chance of surviving in the shape they are today; that Bosnia, Ukraine, Turkey and Mexico will eventually have to take sides. Huntington’s comments, however, did not apply to Poland or Germany.

Huntington is right: a clash of civilizations is imminent. There is no room for the countries in the middle. I have already talked about Poland. And Germany? What can Germany do? After all, this is an occupied country. The Germans missed their chance during the war. We had to fight with us against England, turn the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact to the West, and then Hitler-Stalin forever. Today, instead of English, Russian and German would be spoken everywhere. The Germans did not go for it and lost. Now there is an American occupation and such “murder” that even your mouth cannot be opened. However, I do hope that Germany will shake off this state of affairs and shed its dependency sooner or later. I am convinced that in the common Eurasian home there will be room for Germans, Poles, French and Italians. We, the Russians, will impose only a barbaric, sacred attitude to life on Eurasia, and how it will be manifested in a particular nation will depend on our own national predispositions. I see Poles, for example, as defenders of Slavic racism. The Slavic element always breaks down the frames of individualism, strives for community.

• You say so much about community, collectivity, but in fact you are an individualist.

How’s that? Why? How do you think so?

• Even here, in the premises of the National-Bolshevik Party, it is enough to look around to see that they all look the same in their black uniforms, they even have a similar facial expression, only the Lord is definitely different from them.

I am just like them. I don’t think about myself, I think about others. I don’t think for myself, I think for others. There are two concepts: personalism and individualism. Individualism is the opposite of community, because the center of the world, a constitutive element of the worldview, becomes the human individual, the individual. There is no place for community or holism here, there is only a rational, logical, relative agreement between individuals. What, in turn, do we propose? We are not against the person, but for understanding them supra-individually. This is, in a sense, the Nietzschean idea. Man is a dynamic phenomenon, constantly overcoming himself. This overcoming means human growth, growth beyond the limits of his individuality. In the vertical dimension, a person then becomes a part of a community, an organ of a certain organism. On the other hand, in the horizontal dimension … someone has to think. Together you cannot think, you can act together. If you mix them all together, then the head of this collective organism that will arise will not be the sum of the individual brains, but one brain, the most enlightened one. There must be a certain gnoseological hierarchy. This communal nature of material unity, the horizontal unity of bodies, contains within itself a hierarchy. Often times, people who fight against individualism are personalists. The spirit of unity, the spirit of community, the spirit of the nation can be manifested in them in a very condensed way. They are not individualists, but separate, discrete incarnations of the all-unity. This is their authority. This is the idea of ​​a monarch, a people’s chief, a Fuhrer. This is the phenomenon of the Russian tsars, but also of Pugachev, Lenin and Stalin. And it’s not that some individualist invents collectivism, because then he would be a fraud, a charlatan, a hypnotist. It is like chemistry: when different substances are mixed together, the lightest ones, the gases, float up the highest. Similarly in society: when different human elements are mixed together, the most subtle ones, i.e. the brains, are at the top. Therefore, for some, this idea of ​​community is concentrated in the brain, in others in the soul, and in others in the legs or hands. Nevertheless, it is the same idea for everyone. In this way, one organism is created – Behemoth (as Carl Schmitt would call him), a Eurasian Tatar-Scythian monster, which includes not only people, but also elements, elements of nature, soil, winds, rivers, mountains. The sublimation of this terrible dark cluster is the Russian monarchs, Stalin … Stalin was not a separate individual, but a collective person, an older brother, a manifestation of Eurasianism in its communist variant.

• You said that Russia’s internal imperative is expansion. But what is the purpose of this expansion, what is the idea behind the postulated ideocracy?

The goal of Russian expansion is total soteriological science. We have felt it for centuries, since the time of Metropolitan Ilarion of Kiev, but it is now more obvious than ever that we are not a nation among many, but that we have a mission to reveal a truth to the world. We want a different end to history than the one proposed by the West. We want a sacred end, not a profane end. We are convinced, and we live it, that we have a certain key to spiritual, eschatological truth. Every Russian knows it. Each.

• What is the essence of this truth?

Our whole thousand-year history is an attempt to reveal this truth, to look for forms of its expression. It is the truth that the West has plunged into its depths, it is the truth about salvation, the transformation of the world, a new pleroma, a new quality of being, resurrection from the dead, the transformation of bodies, the sunlight that should come from the lips of the Great Mother. We Russians, due to our ethnic and religious predispositions, are called to do so. Our whole history, including the last battle of communism against capitalism, are only different attempts to realize the same messianic dream.

• To tell the truth, it is somehow difficult for me to imagine communism as a fight for the sacred in the world. Especially in the times of Stalin, so praised by Lord Stalin, it was a deeply anti-Orthodox movement: churches were demolished and closed, bishops were tortured and murdered, the faithful were imprisoned and sent to Siberia, forced atheization was carried out …

First of all, it was the Orthodoxy that Stalin was destroying that was very incidental – imbued with the spirit of the West, alienated from the nation. Second: the messianic dream I mentioned could live outside Orthodoxy and develop in other forms. Communism was an attempt to liberate this messianism from a purely religious understanding. Perhaps this attempt failed precisely because it was so distant from theology. So I think that in the next expansion we should use all our experiences, both purely sacred and socialist. Socialism is nothing more than a secularized version of Byzantineism, it is Red Byzantium, Orthodoxy in a sectarian, exalted form. It can be said that the people’s monarch, Stalin, with the popular faith, that is, communism, stood against the alienated, lordly, noble, occidental monarchy and the Orthodox Church. I am not such an ardent supporter of the Stalinist system, but I can clearly see the pulsation of our historical existence in communism as well. So if I say my unconditional “yes” to Bolshevism, Lenin and Stalin, it is not because it was an ideal system, but because it was the only solution for us. This time we have not succeeded yet, but the next time we will purify Orthodoxy and communism and we will discard those elements that caused these models to alienate themselves from the nation. Our next stage will be Orthodox communism – Eurasian, missionary, pan-Slavic, philotatar …

• It almost sounds like a postmodern project.

We include a lot, but also exclude a lot. We exclude individualism, the individual, the free market, worldview neutrality, tolerance, and we include barbaric, fanatic and exalted elements. This is not postmodernism, but let’s say postmodern. Postmodern is the objective state in which we live after the victory of the West over us. Moderna is over. Postmodernism is just one answer to the postmodern challenge, the liberal answer. There may also be an anti-liberal response, that is ours – postmodern anti-postmodernism. The reflection of the West breaks down everything into prime factors, while at the same time sterilizing and drying up everything like exhibits in a flowerbed. Our reflection does not deprive us of the aroma of life, even erotic delight with our ideas, it makes us drunk, we are drunk with Eurasia …

• As early as in the 18th century, Nikita Panin described the history of Russia as a polar pulsation of deadness and chaos. Similarly, two centuries later, Yuri Lotman – as jumps in entropy and organization. Today’s journalists often compare the present situation of Russia to the Weimar era in German history …

A very accurate comparison.

• The West is aware of this, therefore it does not want to humiliate Russians, to humiliate their national pride, as it did to Germany after the First World War, when it drew huge contributions from them. The West rather wants to raise Russia’s value, invites it to join the G-7 group, and pumps millions of dollars into the Russian economy. I want to avoid the Weimar scenario …

The West treats Russia very severely. I think that he did not draw conclusions from the Weimar lesson. The more he puts pressure on us, the more he will have to pay for it. It works like a spring: the harder you push, the harder it will hit back. The West is geographic Satan, geographic Antichrist. The West should pay for everything. It would be best to settle it with Chinese, Tatars, Muslims, all this Eurasian nomadism. When I was walking the streets of Paris recently, I suddenly noticed that I was missing something. And I realized it was odorless, sterile, aseptic. The only fragrance in the West is perfume. Earth, air, flowers, trees only started to smell in Poland, and when I returned to Russia, I plunged into the madness of smells. The West is dead land. It will only come back to life when it is settled by Cossacks, Tajiks, and Kazakhs. They will bring life with them, they will bring fragrances.

• You refer to the Orthodox tradition at almost every step. But does Orthodoxy itself admit to your ideas? I talked to many representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church in Moscow and none of them consider you an orthodox believer, you are considered a rather heretic.

Who said that?

• For example, deacon Andrei Kurayev.

And deacon Alexander Mumrikov said that I was fully Orthodox. And what? One deacon’s sentence against the other’s sentence. Fortunately, we do not have Catholicism, where there is the office of the Pope and everyone must obey him. I, too, can safely say that Deacon Kurayev is not fully Orthodox. At the moment, there are two Orthodoxy: the first – living, full of spirit, and the second – official, formalized, and staff. Deacon Kurajew represents the formal, pro-systemic, I would say even profane branch of Orthodoxy. He writes texts that are spiritually Catholic. For example, he believes that the merit of Christianity was an impulse to the development of exact sciences, which caused the desacralization of the cosmos. The Hesychaists would have hailed him as a heretic at once. Fortunately, Orthodoxy is wider than the Church itself and also includes a branch of the Old Believers. I belong to the Moscow Patriarchate myself, but I am in spirit with the Old Believers. Besides, they consider themselves the only true Orthodox. If there is ever a real revival of Orthodoxy, it will come not from the ossified structures of the official Church, but from the depths of the Russian national spirit, which has been fully preserved among the Old Believers.

• And which branch of the Old Believers is closer to you? Circulars or non-circulars?

This division applies to the Białokrynica hierarchy. On the other hand, I am more interested in another division: popowców and bezopowców. I am closer to the poppers who reject priests as more radical. Among them, however, the closest to me is the faction of non-believers who believe that the kingdom of Antichrist has already come, and that it is the Catholic and Protestant West.

• I see that you have a very closed thought system. But what are the chances that the ideas you are preaching will find resonance in society? Observing the Lord, you can say: some haunted idealist is sitting in the basement, something is raving under his breath, but his fantasies have absolutely no effect on people. Oh, another frustration in our century …

I will try to answer this question in three steps. First, even if I am an idealist who sits in the basement and whose ideas play no role, it does not bother me because all the great ideas started with the idealists who sat in the basement and played no role. The fate of the idea is specific. A man who deals with ideas is immersed in a theurgical atmosphere where what is invisible and inaudible appears to him as visible and audible, even in the form of a text or discourse. And even if I had remained unknown to anyone until my death and left no written word behind, what counts is the mere fact of capturing the main vectors of history, the main ideas of civilization.
Second: I am active in the National-Bolshevik Party. It is not a big party, but it has a clear focus: we especially try to influence young people, especially students, who will be the elite of the young generation in the future. We are, after all, the only party that deals with the thoughts of young people. We teach them to think and live. We are concerned with the indoctrination of the next generation. This is not done by anyone in Russia: neither liberals nor communists …

• Television does it.

That’s right, but she forms average and passive people. We, on the other hand, shape people, as Gumilev called them, passionate, above-average, those whom Pareto called counter-relatives of the future. Other nationalist parties, such as the Barkashists, do not form a counter-past, but defensive troops. Their militant organizations are not elites of any kind. We, on the other hand, focus on those who will set the tone for life in Russia in the future, we prepare them conceptually. We organize seminars for them, publish magazines and books. It can be said that our party is purely intellectual. All these pickets or demonstrations are only an addition to the basic task, which is the intellectual preparation of a generation. We already have hundreds of people formed this way across the country.
Third and finally: my ideas are not confined to the party itself. Since 1987, I have been actively involved in the ideologization of the broadly understood patriotic camp. The two largest parties in the present Duma – the communists of Zyuganov and the nationalists of Zhirinsky – took over from me, especially from my earlier texts, the main ideological and geopolitical ideas. Many politicians, whom I did not even know personally, also referred to the ideas I put forward, for example, General Liebiedź.

• Maybe because one of Liebidzia’s advisers was Heydar Dżemal. In 1991, in your publishing house, you published the book Orientacja: Północ.

Our paths with Dżemal diverged because his traditionalism and Eurasianism is Muslim, and mine – Russian. Returning, however, to the previous thread. It does not matter if I personally know Ruckkoy or Khashbulatov who take over my ideas. I am like Ivan Pereswietov, who came up with an oprycznina for Ivan the Terrible. I’m a thought lab. I don’t think for myself, I think for the state, for the nation, for history. I’m waiting for my Ivan the Terrible. All politicians who will be looking for a real and great idea for Russia will come to me sooner or later. Not because I am a great individual and I personally came up with something myself, but because there is an objective idea of ​​Russia, and I am only its exponent. My latest book, Fundamentals of Geopolitics, is read by all opposition politicians and the more serious officials of the Yeltsin administration. The idea of ​​the Moscow-Berlin-Paris axis, which Yeltsin spoke about recently, is directly taken from my writings. If Tokyo is added to that, it is a classic element of the Eurasian geopolitical concept. In addition, many circles in other former Soviet republics are interested in our ideas of a conservative revolution. For example, in Armenia, the group of Robert Kocharian, who came to power at the moment, the so-called the party of the war are people largely shaped in our writings. So to sum up: with or without me – what I am writing about, it will happen anyway. Who will be the subject, who will put these ideas into practice – I do not know and do not undertake to answer. Perhaps it will be the current government that will change its face, it may be some opposing force, it may happen in many years, but it is an inevitable process. I may disappear, but my geopolitical ideas will not disappear.

• It is often said about your environment that you are the Russian counterpart of the Western European New Right. This orientation, assuming that the battle for the fate of mankind would take place not in the political but in the cultural field, proclaimed a kind of Kulturkamp …

Kulturkampf of the New Right is a wonderful idea, Alain de Benoist is a heroic activist and brilliant thinker, but their fight for thirty years has brought no results. They said that the battlefield would be culture, while the Americanization made its greatest triumphs in culture. Right-wing gramcsism is in a deplorable state, it has never gone beyond the margins. How to explain this? I think that the conceptual model of the New Right is very interesting, but the temperament of its European activists is insufficient to implement such ideas. They are too civilized, too conservative, too cowardly, such warm dumplings. So I don’t like comparing with them, because it’s basically comparing with losers. Over the years of the opposition in Russia, I have done such things that they never dreamed of. I was not concerned with the Kulturkampfem, but with the ideological fertilization of serious political forces. I have worked with living history, not archeology. The only man in the West whose breadth of views shocked me was Jean Thiriart, the author of the idea of ​​a Euro-Soviet empire. Before his death, he even came to Moscow; I hosted him here, I introduced him to Jegor Ligaczow, Ziuganow, Baburin …
Europe today has a choice: Eurasianism or Atlanticism. Either he goes with Russia or with America. If the European New Right chooses us, that is, it chooses the barbarian element, and therefore must adopt our methods of operation. You have to organize attacks, deal with sabotage, set fire to, and blow up bridges. True antimondialism is destruction and terror. What is the New Right doing? She turned into an intellectual sect. Overweight and gray men have been gathering at seminars for thirty years and beating foam. Of course you have to read books, but that’s not enough. You have to create a guerilla. If you are against the New World Order then take a knife, put on a mask, go out in the evening and kill at least one yankie. That is why I am so close to the New Left, the Red Brigades, and the Rote Armee Fraktion. Our task is not limited to culture, our task is to make a real revolution. For this we need ideology and intellectual preparation, but without concrete participation in the action, without frontline experience, without combat baptism – it will remain unattainable for us. I do not know if any of the New Right activists have ever been under artillery fire, but our people not only attend meetings or fight barricades, but also go to real wars, e.g. to Transnistria or Yugoslavia. The New Right is just a project, and we are designers and executors, architects and builders. Our future is.

• Thank you for the conversation.

By David Dautheir-Villars & Ann Simmons
Wall Street Journal
October 3-4, 2020 Anno Domini

Turkey’s role in the growing clash between Armenia and Azerbaijan—two countries Moscow regards as within its sphere of influence—is adding a new element to a string of proxy fights pitting Turkey and Russia against each other and challenging Russia’s long-standing policy of neutrality over the simmering conflict.

Roughly the size of Delaware, the province of Nagorno- Karabakh—a disputed enclave within Azerbaijan—has been a flashpoint between Azerbaijan and Armenia since the years following the collapse of the Soviet Union. It is recognized internationally as part of Azerbaijan but controlled by pro-Armenian rebels.

About 30,000 people were killed in fighting during a six- year period before a cease-fire in 1994. But hostilities resumed last week, with each side blaming the other for a series of surprise attacks.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has long worked to keep former Soviet republics bound tightly to Moscow, and has sought to stay on good terms with both Azerbaijan and Armenia, due to their strategic location along an important energy corridor coveted by the West.

Now, a more assertive Turkey is testing that stance. Hours after fighting broke out, Turkey announced its unconditional support for Azerbaijan, with which it shares ethnic and culturalties. Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan re-iterated that support on Friday.

“We stand with fellow and brother Azerbaijan,” he said. “Until Nagorno-Karabakh is liberated from invasion, this struggle will continue.”

The scope of Turkey’s support is unclear. France’s President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday that he had information that mercenaries from Syria had passed through Turkey to reach Nagorno-Kara- bakh. Mr. Erdogan’s government has denied the claim but its open support for Azerbaijan—the latest example of Turkey’s more muscular foreign policy—is putting Russia on the back foot at a delicate time for Moscow. A pro-democracy movement is threatening to pry Belarus from Moscow’s sphere of influence, and a wave of protests in Russia’s Far East is challenging Mr. Putin’s own standing.

“We use our privileges to be a welcomed party by both Armenia and Azerbaijan,” said Sergey Markedonov, senior researcher at the government-run Moscow State Institute of International Relations. “Turkey concentrates only on one side and it creates obstacles for Russia, because it pushes Azerbaijan to make a choice.”

Moscow, in contrast, has remained studiously neutral during the long-running conflict and has anointed itself mediator. After supplying Armenia with powerful ballistic missiles in the 1990s it then sold Azerbaijan the means to shoot them down through a complex new air-defense system. It also warned other countries to keep out of the fray.

“Any statements on military support or military activity unambiguously add fuel to the fire, and we are categorically opposed to this,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters this week.

Under Mr. Putin’s leadership, Russia has shown little hesitation to intervene militarily if it feels its dominance over former Soviet republics is challenged. It seized territory from both Georgia and Ukraine to counter what the Kremlin said was meddling from the West.

And Russia has warned Western powers to steer clear of the continuing political conflict in Belarus, where Mr. Putin’s ally President Alexander Lukashenko has faced weeks of post-election protests.

Turkey’s support for Azerbaijan, said Thomas de Waal, a senior fellow with the Carnegie Europe think tank, has left Russia on the defensive. “If they were to try and step in to support the Armenians, they would lose Azerbaijan and they would lose that role [as a mediator],” he said.

“Trump’s shift on the Golan indirectly validated Russia’s seizure of Crimea.”

By Yaroslav Trofimov
Sept. 19, 2020 Anno Domini
Wall Street Journal

When the founders of the U.N. gatheredered in San Francisco after the Nazis’ defeat in 1945, they made a bold decision: to outlaw territorial conquest, the method by which many of the world’s borders had been shaped. The new U.N. Charter barred members of the world body “from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.”

For decades afterward, the inviolability of existing international borders—regardless of how well they matched a region’s ethnic makeup or served historical justice—was one of the most widely invoked principles of global affairs. The broad U.S.-led coalition to restore the independence of Kuwait—annexed in 1990 by Saddam Hussein’s Iraq as its wayward 19th province—stood as a testament to the endurance of that postwar proposition.

But today, in a newly unmoored international order in which the strong increasingly exercise raw power over the weak, old territorial grievances are bubbling up to the surface again. This new willingness to try to alter borders by force is arising just as the U.S., which for decades guaranteed the stability of the international system, is pulling back from its global commitments and the institutions that it helped to forge in the wake of World War II. In many major capitals, an irredentist ambition to grab the territory of neighbors is driving policy once again.

“Our habit that borders remain fixed is the product of a very recent past, of the second half of the 20th century and the Cold War. If you look at European history, there has not been a single century when borders didn’t shift in a radical way,” said Fyodor Lukyanov, chairman of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, a Moscow think tank that advises the Russian government.

“A principle of international relations is not some commandment from Moses. It’s the product of a balance of power and interests,” he added. “When someone is able to ensure that those rules and principles are observed, they are observed. When this ability ends, they are no longer observed.”

Countries have invaded each other since the dawn of history, but irredentism—a belief that historic parts of one’s country under supposedly unjust foreign rule must be reunited with the homeland—is a much more recent invention. The term was coined in 1877 by the Italian politician Matteo Renato Imbriani. Speaking at his father’s funeral, he pledged not to rest until all of Italy’s “terre irredente”— “unredeemed lands” then under the Austro-Hungarian crown—were liberated.

Irredentism quickly grew into a potent political force, legitimizing demands for territorial conquest and helping to
spark both world wars. The most consequential irredentist movement, of course, arose in Germany, where Hitler promised to reunite the German Volk, newly divided by supposedly unfair post-World War I frontiers, into a rejuvenated Third Reich.

The horrors unleashed by the resulting war triggered a profound reset of international norms—and a hard-won belief that insisting on fixed, inviolable borders would help to ward off future aggression and conflict. African states that became independent in the 1960s and 1970s universally agreed not to challenge their frontiers, many of which were arbitrarily drawn by colonial powers. In 1970, West Germany accepted the loss of what is now western Poland. Argentina’s irredentist invasion of the Falkland Islands in 1982 ended in a military rout and the downfall of its military dictatorship. While the breakups of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia in the early 1990s caused several civil wars and created a half-dozen separatist enclaves, the existing administrative borders of the component Soviet and Yugoslav republics remained as the internationally recognized frontiers of newly independent states such as Georgia and Bosnia-Herzegovina.

Then came Russia’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula in 2014—the first irredentist change of borders in Europe since World War II. This major breach of established global rules met with only halfhearted international repercussions, such as mild sanctions by the U.S. and the European Union. Russian President Vladimir Putin’s territorial grab was followed later that year by a semi-covert invasion of Russian forces into Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region.

“We have chipped away at the foundations of international law by doing nothing, or doing very little, in response,” said Toomas Hendrik Ilves, who served as president of Estonia in 2006-16. “It is a very dangerous trend, especially for small countries like mine. If you are a small country, what do you really have except international law and its prohibitions on aggression and changing borders through force?”

Mr. Putin, who sees himself as the “gatherer of Russian lands” unfairly lost during the Soviet Union’s collapse, has repeatedly called Ukraine an unredeemed part of the historic Russian homeland. He holds the same view of Belarus, now undergoing an unprecedented democratic upheaval. “I believe that the Belarusians, the Russians and the Ukrainians are one people,” he said last year.

Russia’s brazenness in Crimea went a long way to embolden China’s communist leaders. Much like Mr. Putin, President Xi Jinping is focused on restoring his country’s erstwhile glory. He has already erased much of the distinctiveness of Hong Kong, a former British colony, and is becoming more vocal about absorbing Taiwan, a former Japanese possession that has never been ruled by the Chinese Communist Party. 

“Crimea certainly had an impact on China because it showed that the West was powerless to stop a territorial grab,” said Minxin Pei of Claremont McKenna College. “Eastern Ukraine also gave China some ideas that you could run a ‘hybrid warfare,’ making the life of Ukraine—or Taiwan—very miserable without crossing the line of a real war.”

Beijing is also making irredentist claims over swaths of north India, where Chinese troops engaged in a deadly clash with Indian forces in June, and the South China Sea, where China has erected outposts in areas claimed by the Philippines, Vietnam and others. This year, Kazakhstan and Tajikistan’s foreign ministries protested after official Chinese publications described large parts of their countries as historic Chinese territories that should return to the motherland.

“China is certainly a very revisionist power,” said retired Rear Adm. Sudarshan Shrikhande, a former chief of India’s naval intelligence. “It’s quite astounding how China seems to be wanting to simultaneously rub so many countries the wrong way.”

Smaller powers are showing irredentist leanings too. Over the past three years, the Turkish military has occupied some parts of Syria and Iraq that President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has said should have remained in Turkey after the breakup of the Ottoman Empire a century ago. In recent weeks, Turkey also came close to a military confrontation with Greece over Ankara’s expansive new claims over the Eastern Mediterranean, a crisis that has prompted some senior Turkish officials to question Greece’s sovereignty over Greek islands close to the Anatolian mainland such as Rhodes. “Our civilization is one of conquest,” Mr. Erdogan thundered in August.

Meanwhile, Hungary’s nationalist leader, Viktor Orban, regularly decries the 1920 Trianon treaty that left large ethnic Hungarian minorities outside of Hungary’s borders. Since 2017, he has blocked Ukraine’s formal co-operation with NATO over the status of Ukraine’s ethnic Hungarian minority.

Even the U.S. is no longer universally committed to the principle of the inviolability of international borders. Last year, President Donald Trump recognized Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights, which Israel took from Syria in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. Israel had been prepared to return the land to Syria for peace as recently as the mid-2000s. The Kremlin happily noted that Mr. Trump’s shift on the Golan indirectly validated Russia’s seizure of Crimea.

The need to counter this drift toward greater acceptance of territorial conquest is becoming increasingly urgent, warned Daniela Schwarzer, director of the German Council on Foreign Relations. “It’s a very grim picture that is emerging,” she said. Unless the trend can be reversed, she added, “the gate will be open for chaos in many regions of the world.”