Site icon Fitzpatrick Informer

Skousen correct about Putin, but some red flags up

Anti-communist meeting, 11 December 1961. (Left to Right) John Birch Society member and former FBI special agent W. Cleon Skousen (uncle of Joel Skousen); Sam M Cavnar; John B Kilroy; General Orvil A Anderson; Julia Brown; Dr. William L Brashears.; Caption slip reads: (Photo by Los Angeles Examiner/USC Libraries/Corbis via Getty Images)

By Timothy Fitzpatrick
Oct. 12, 2022 Anno Domini

Joel Skousen’s general premise that Putin is controlled opposition and Russia’s occupation of Ukraine is unjustified is spot on, but he is out of touch on other points, like where he calls Russia a Catholic majority or ignores Jewish power.

Credit to Skousen for taking the contra against crypto-Jew Vladimir Putin when so many compromised mainstream and alternative political analysts are either misrepresenting Putin as a fascist (bad) ultra conservative or as a nationalist (good) conservative (neither is true). His recent analysis Putin’s culture war with the West is very good and I encourage everyone to read it.

However, in his critique of Russia as a hypocrite, the Mormon-educated Skousen writes:

“Like most Catholic majorities around the world, few attend mass, and even fewer abide by the Christian doctrine of fidelity in marriage because of the ease at which confession and absolution of sins can be had.”

Russia is an Eastern Orthodox majority. It has never been Catholic. This is not an insignificant difference. Skousen is of a wise age and a seasoned political analyst who should know this. Why doesn’t he? Is he deliberately distorting the religious situation there? It’s hard to believe that Skousen hasn’t read at least one of Lyndon Larouche’s many pieces from the 1980s (back when EIR was half decent) demonstrating how the Soviets amalgamated Eastern Orthodox messianic expectation in the form of Third Romism with the old Byzantine-inspired (Khazarian) Russian imperial war plan.

Skousen seems to suggest that the Catholic sacrament of penance is inherently flawed. It may be easier to obtain absolution from a Novus Ordo confessor, but this is not Church teaching. The sacrament of penance is a serious matter that is not carried out willy, nilly. It is a act of contrition to God, through his priesthood, with absolution given only to the truly repentant.

Skousen claims that he and Christopher Storey were the only two “political scientists” in the world at the time to reveal the “collapse” of Communism being a psyop. What about Soviet defectors, like Igor Gouzenko? If anyone deserves the most credit in revealing this massive deception, I can’t think of anyone more appropriate than Anatoliy Golitsyn. (I recall asking alleged Russian defector “Boris” on the Jerome Corsi show in 2020-2021 about Anatoliy Golitsyn, and he acted as if he had no idea who he was. Are these analysts this ignorant?)

While Golitsyn never seemed to reveal the leading Jewish role in world affairs, especially as it pertains to the Communist conspiracy, his information dovetails nicely with the research of other analysts brave enough to name the Jew (the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and Golitsyn’s works provide a seamless narrative of the current world situation). That’s not the case with either Storey or Skousen. While their work tells much truth, it misleads by not identifying the leading culprits. Is it “for fear of the Jews” that they omit this crucial detail, is it ignorance, or have they been running cover for the synagogue in a multi-layered onion of controlled opposition to the controlled opposition (dialectics)?

As for Skousen’s final point about who is to blame for the so called sabotage of the Russian Nordstream 2 pipeline, I agree with him that “there are no good guys in this conflict, only competing evil sources along with naive and unknowledgeable people in the middle who are going to suffer.” Both the Western (decoy) NWO and the Eastern Eurasian NWO benefit from this “sabotage”. It’s only the plebs who lose.

This critique is not meant to discredit either Skousen or Storey, but to, in the case of Skousen, call him to greater accountability in accuracy about the Roman Catholic Church and in identifying the primary enemies of America and the West. If you cannot name the Jew, you lack either courage and/or sound judgment. I can’t rule out that the Skousens are part of the Jewish, Bernard Baruch-controlled anti-Communist movement of America, as outlined by the late Michael Collins Piper here. One particular quote revealed by Piper’s research comes from Morris Horton, who stated this about the workings of Jewish-controlled anti-Communism in America:

“Most of the Communists and many of the anti-Communists are on the same payroll, the Jewish payroll. They carry on a sham battle with each other. The first basic rule of this sham battle is: ‘Never drag any real truth into the matter on either side; tell anything else you want to tell, but never tell the truth.’ This is the basic background of most of the phony ‘experts’ on Communism who have been ‘experting’ about it for forty years and haven’t made a dent in it.” —Source

Furthermore, Skousen’s late uncle W. Cleon Skousen was a member of the seemingly controlled opposition John Birch Society, worked for the FBI under the apparent Mossad-compromised J. Edgar Hoover, and may be connected to the masons.

“In 1956, reeling from a scandal in the police department, the mayor of Salt Lake City, Adiel Stewart, offered Skousen the job of chief of police. The extent of respect that Skousen enjoyed in the city was reflected in the fact that he was encouraged to accept the offer not only by his own Mormon Church President David O. McKay, but also by the local Catholic and Masonic community leadership”. —Source

Exit mobile version