(Editor’s note: We believe the Jewish/Israeli leadership, in tandem with the Soviets, was involved in the creation of the PLO and the Palestinian people (as suggested in the Oded Yinon Plan) and is involved in their ongoing Marxist class struggle against the West (via Israel). The Jewish leadership is not a victim of the Palestinian invention, as the following paper suggests at times. However, the average Israeli is considered cannon fodder by its own leadership and certainly would be victimized by this cruel Balkanization scheme. Lastly, Brand concludes that Israel is the West’s first line of defense, an extremely naive statement if not a deliberate lie. Israel and Russia are working hand in hand for the demise of the West and the crowing of world communism as its replacement. For further analysis, see: Pacepa’s misreading of Operation SIG)
How Soviet Russia created the “peace process” and incited the Muslim world against the U.S.
By Wallace Edward Brand
July 11, 2020 Anno Domini
The “peace process” is now, after some 20 years after OSLO, is known to be no more than a charade. The revelations of the highest ranking Soviet bloc defector, Major General Ion Mihai Pacepa, show that the peace process is, and has from the outset, been nothing but a charade.
It all started with the creation of a fictitious “Palestinian People” who allegedly demand political self determination. This collective noun was created by the Soviet disinformation masters in 1964 when they created the Palestinian Liberation Organization, the “PLO”. The term “Palestinian People” as a descriptive of Arabs in Palestine appeared for the first time in the preamble of the 1964 PLO Charter, drafted in Moscow. The facts in the preamble to the Charter were affirmed onlyh by the first 422 members of the Palestinian National Council, handpicked by the KGB.
Why in Moscow? The 1960s and 1970s were the years the Soviets were in the business of creating “liberation organizations”: for Palestine and Bolivia in 1964, Columbia 1965, in the 70s “The Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia” that bombed US airline offices in Europe, and “The Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine that bombed Israelis.” But the PLO, was by far its most enduring success.
Major-General Ion Mihai Pacepa is the highest ranking defector from the Soviet bloc during the Cold War. He has written that for nearly four decades, the PLO has been the largest, wealthiest, and most politically connected terrorist organization in the world. For most of that time, it was held in the firm grip of Yasser Arafat’s iron fist. But Arafat was not the fierce, independent actor he posed as; he was completely dependent on the Soviet KGB and its surrogate Warsaw Pact intelligence services for arms, training, logistical support, funds, and direction.
According to Pacepa his KGB handlers included Vasali Samoylenko, Vladimir Buljakov, and Soviet “Ambassador” Alexander Soldatov. Arafat’s closest friend and head of PLO intelligence, Hani Hassan, was actually an agent of the DIE, the Romanian subsidiary of the KGB. Pacepa was its head. He speaks not from opinion but from his personal knowledge.
In the PLO Charter preamble they actually had to use the phrase “Palestinian Arab People” to exclude those Jews who had retained a presence in Palestine since Biblical times and had been a majority population in Jerusalem as early as 1845. Romanian Communist dictator Ceausescu, at Soviet urging, persuaded Arafat to abandon his claim of wanting to annihilate the Jews in Israel in favor of “liberating the Palestinian People” in Israel.
Why? A brilliant strategy. That was the first step in reframing the conflict between the Arabs and the Jews from religious jihad to secular nationalism in a quest for political self determination, a posture far less offensive to the West. By focusing on political liberation for a small group of Arabs, it ignored the fact that Israel is a small state whose existence is threatened by the surrounding Arab states. These are states that outnumber its population many fold with Muslims who are commanded by an extreme form of their religion to kill infidels to take back land formerly controlled by Muslims.
It creates Jews in Israel, ignoring they are a relatively small group in comparison with the Arabs surrounding them, as oppressors of an even smaller discrete group of Arabs, described in the Charter as Palestinian Arabs excluding those in Jordan, Judea, Samaria and Gaza. (After the 1967 war, and the Isreali conquest of Judea, Samaria and Gaza, the exclusions for Arabs in those areas were removed the Charter. To enter into the pretended peace negotionations it pretended to excluse the Palestinian Arabs within the Green Line but has never taken steps to carry out its promise to amend the PLO Charter). It transforms the Jews from victims to oppressors. It worked.
The Arabs in Palestine had been engaged in religious jihad at least since 1929 when they massacred 69 Jews in Hebron and more elsewhere, egged on by Haj Amin al Husseini, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. He had imported the Brotherhood’s vicious jihadist doctrines into Palestine from Egypt. Now, mirabile dictu, jihad became “liberation”. The religiously motivated attacks on Jews were turned into “resistance” from oppression motivated by secular nationalism. This will explain to you why, whenever the Arabs attacked the Jews thereafter, they said they were “resisting”.
In his book, History Upside Down, David Meir Levi puts it this way:
“Arafat was particularly struck by Ho Chi Minh’s success in mobilizing left-wing sympathizers in Europe and the United States, where activists on American campuses, enthusiastically following the [propaganda] line of North Vietnamese operatives, had succeeded in reframing the Vietnam war from a Communist assault on the south to a struggle for national liberation. Ho’s chief strategist, General Giap, made it clear to Arafat and his lieutenants that in order to succeed, they too needed to redefine the terms of their struggle. Giap’s counsel was simple but profound: the PLO needed to work in a way that concealed its real goals, permitted strategic deception, and gave the appearance of moderation: “Stop talking about annihilating Israel and instead turn your terror war into a struggle for human rights. Then you will have the American people eating out of your hand.”
At the same time that he was getting advice from General Giap, Arafat was also being tutored by Muhammad Yazid, who had been minister of information in two Algerian wartime governments (1958-1962): wipe out the argument that Israel is a small state whose existence is threatened by the Arab states, or the reduction of the Palestinian problem to a question of refugees; instead, present the Palestinian struggle as a struggle for liberation like the others. Wipe out the impression that in the struggle between the Palestinians and the Zionists, the Zionist is the underdog. Now it is the Arab who is oppressed and victimized in his existence because he is not only facing the Zionists but also world imperialism.
To make sure that they followed this advice, the KGB put Arafat and his adjutants into the hands of a master of propaganda: Nicolai Ceausescu, president-for-life of Romania.
For the next few years, Ceausescu hosted Arafat frequently and gave him lessons on how to apply the advice of Giap, Yazid, and others in the Soviet orbit. Arafat’s personal “handler,” Ion Mihai Pacepa, the head of the Romanian military intelligence, had to work hard on his sometimes unruly protege. Pacepa later recorded a number of sessions during which Arafat railed against Ceausescu’s injunctions that the PLO should present itself as a people’s revolutionary army striving to right wrongs and free the oppressed: he wanted only to obliterate Israel. Gradually, though, Ceausescu’s lessons in Machiavellian statecraft sank in. During his early Lebanon years, Arafat developed propaganda tactics that would allow him to create the image of a homeless people oppressed by a colonial power. This makeover would serve him well in the west for decades to come.”
Brezhnev, according to Pacepa, carried it one step farther when Carter came into office. He suggested to Pacepa that Carter might fall for Yassir Arafat PRETENDING to renounce violence and pretending to seek peace negotiations. He persuaded Arafat to do this by telling him that the West would shower him with gold and glory. It did. Billions of dollars and a Nobel prize. Ceausescu warned Arafat he would have to pretend over and over again. Abbas is still pretending. James Woolsey, former CIA director has been reported as stating that Pacepa is credible. Pacepa’s account is also corroborated by Zahir Muhsein, a member of the PLO executive board. In an interview by the Dutch newspaper Trouw in 1977, he stated that there is no such thing as the “Palestinian People”, that the term’s use is a political ploy, and there is no quest for political self-determination — that as soon as the Jews have been wiped out, sovereignty would be turned over to Jordan.
Hafez Assad also has stated there was no “Palestinian People”; that prior to 1964 the Arabs in Palestine called themselves “citizens of Greater Syria”.
During WWI the British offered the local Arabs self determination if they helped in the war against the Ottoman Empire but the local Arabs fought on the side of the Ottomans to the eternal gratitude of the Turks.
This is from Pacepa’s article “Russian Footprints” in National Review Online:
“In 1972, the Kremlin decided to turn the whole Islamic world against Israel and the U.S. As KGB chairman Yury Andropov told me [Pacepa], a billion adversaries could inflict far greater damage on America than could a few millions. We needed to instill a Nazi-style hatred for the Jews throughout the Islamic world, and to turn this weapon of the emotions into a terrorist bloodbath against Israel and its main supporter, the United States. No one within the American/Zionist sphere of influence should any longer feel safe.
“According to Andropov, the Islamic world was a waiting petri dish in which we could nurture a virulent strain of America-hatred, grown from the bacterium of Marxist-Leninist thought. Islamic anti-Semitism ran deep. The Muslims had a taste for nationalism, jingoism, and victimology. Their illiterate, oppressed mobs could be whipped up to a fever pitch.”
Again from the National Review Online article, Pacepa writes:
“In the mid 1970s, the KGB ordered my [Rumanian intelligence] service, the DIE — along with other East European sister services — to scour the country for trusted party activists belonging to various Islamic ethnic groups, train them in disinformation and terrorist operations, and infiltrate them into the countries of our ‘sphere of influence.’ Their task was to export a rabid, demented hatred for American Zionism by manipulating the ancestral abhorrence for Jews felt by the people in that part of the world. Before I left Romania for good, in 1978, my DIE had dispatched around 500 such undercover agents to Islamic countries. According to a rough estimate received from Moscow, by 1978 the whole Soviet-bloc intelligence community had sent some 4,000 such agents of influence into the Islamic world.
In the mid-1970s we also started showering the Islamic world with an Arabic translation of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a tsarist Russian forgery that had been used by Hitler as the foundation for his anti-Semitic philosophy. We also disseminated a KGB-fabricated “documentary” paper in Arabic alleging that Israel and its main supporter, the United States, were Zionist countries dedicated to converting the Islamic world into a Jewish colony.
We in the Soviet bloc tried to conquer minds, because we knew we could not win any military battles. It is hard to say what exactly are the lasting effects of operation SIG. But the cumulative effect of disseminating hundreds of thousands of Protocols in the Islamic world and portraying Israel and the United States as Islam’s deadly enemies was surely not constructive.”
You can find additional revelations in Pacepa’s biography, Red Horizons and in a Front Page magazine interview with him:.
The foregoing gives much insight into the invention of the Palestinian Arab People, however the strongest clue on the motivation of inventing a “Palestinian People” can be found from a reading of Professor Eugene Rostow’s 1980 article Palestinian Self-Determination: Possible Futures for the Unallocated Territories in the Yale Studies on World Public Order.
“Slowly and reluctantly, Europe and the United States are coming to realize that the pattern of events in the Middle East reflects more than random turbulence in the aftermath of the British and French Empires. For nearly thirty turbulent years, the Soviet Union has sought control of this geo-political nerve center in order to bring Western Europe into its sphere. Even if Soviet ambitions were confined to Europe, Soviet hegemony in the Middle East would profoundly change the world balance of power. But Soviet control of the Middle East would lead inevitably to further accretions of Soviet power if China, Japan, and many smaller and more vulnerable countries should conclude that the United States had lost the will or the capacity to defend its vital interests * * * The exploitation of Arab hostility to the Balfour Declaration, the Palestine Mandate, and the existence of Israel has been a major weapon in the Soviet campaign to dominate the Middle East. * * * * The attack on the legitimacy of Israel has been the strongest and most effective tool of Soviet strategy in the Middle East* * * The anti-Israel card is not the only asset in the Soviet Union’s Middle East hand, but among the Middle Eastern masses it has been trumps. * * *After the 1973 War, when there was some danger that Egypt and other countries might make peace with Israel, the Soviet Union invited Arafat to Moscow, supported his appearance before the United Nations in November, 1974, and increased its pressure for General Assembly resolutions supporting claims of self- determination for the Palestinian Arabs and denouncing Zionism as ‘racism’ [emphasis added]”
Professor Rostow again addressed the question of the political rights of the Arab and Jewish Peoples and the rights of the so called “Palestinian People” in a paper he wrote just after the OSLO agreement was signed, in November 1993 entitled The Future of Palestine:
“The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favour of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent “natural law” claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own.” [emphasis added]
It was Woodrow Wilson in his Fourteen Points Speech in 1918 who was the first to put forward the right of self-determination, focusing on these rights for Syria, Mesopotamia and Palestine although foreshadowed by the work of John Locke. And in 1941 its was again mentioned by Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill in their “Atlantic Charter” in 1941 created aboard a battleship in the Atlantic Ocean. These were both mentioned as matters of “natural law” with the rights of self-determination as a natural or God given right. But they slowly evolved from natural law into International Law.
The first UN adoption of the right of self-determination was in its Charter, in 1945 just after the end of WWII. Self-determination is clearly mentioned in the 1945 UN Charter (Art. 1(2)) but only as a “principle”. States’ sovereignty and territorial integrity are reserved in Art. 2:
“The Organization and its Members, in pursuit of the Purposes stated in Article 1, shall act in accordance with the following Principles.
1. The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all its Members.”
Among the General Assembly Resolutions not long after WWII was Resolution 1514, the decolonization resolution, adopted some 15 years later in December, 1960 and then two more that were not expressly addressed to decolonization arrived in the middle 60’s, The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Each of these provided as a matter not only of “natural law” but also of International Law that “All peoples have the right to self determination. But they also required respect for territorial integrity by insisting they “respect that right [of self-determination] in conformance with the conditions of the Charter of the United Nations”. As of this date, International Law supported the right of self-determination in decolonizations where no secession was involved that would impinge on territorial integrity of a sovereign state.
Was the Soviet Union’s pressure on the UN General Assembly to support the “Palestinian” claims for self determination promoted by the dezinformatsia to help the attack on the legitimacy of Israel by promoting the cause of the Arabs? These resolutions for two international covenants were adopted in 1966, two years after the preamble of the first charter of the PLO invented the Palestinian People to be put into effect in 1976. A major factor in the early 1970s was the after- shock of the oil embargo, and the rising influence of the OIC Organization of the Islamic Conference (now “Cooperation”), which included the Arab Bloc and many other countries. The influence of the Soviet Union was primarily channeled through the NAM (Non-Aligned Movement) which included the Third World countries, and were pretty much “aligned” with the Left in spite of their name.
If they wanted to help the Arabs in Palestine by supporting a state for them to be carved out of the Jewish Peoples state, the Russians had three barriers to overcome. First, the Palestinians were undifferentiated members of the Arab people located in Palestine. They were not and never had been a nation or a people. They had never ruled Palestine from a capital in Palestine.
Second, they had never sought the right of self determination.
Third, the right under International Law had been limited to decolonizations where there was a tension between such a right and the right of sovereign states to territorial integrity. Only decolonizations would not affect the boundary of an existing sovereign state. Secessions would.
With the Soviet invention of the Palestinian Arab People in 1964, and their quest for self-determination assumed in the preamble of the PLO Charter, (Brand, Was there a Palestinian Arab National Movement at the End of the Ottoman Period) the first two barriers could be overcome
The same people may still working now on overcoming the third barrier. Territorial integrity of sovereign states has been the mainstay of world order since the 1648 Peace of Westphalia. International Lawyers had always given territorial integrity a priority over the right of self determination. There is some evidence that the right to self-determination was considered for the charter of the League of Nations in 1919, but at the time, the authors could not resolve the cases where there was tension with the territorial integrity of sovereign states.
Currently there is a movement among ethical philosophers and International Law commentators for an exception to the existing rule of International Law that the right of self determination only supports decolonization and not secession that would change the boundary of a state. They argue for it as a last resort where a people or nation is much oppressed by the majority population of the state. You don’t have to look far to hear, created by PW or psychological warfare, the Narrative of Perpetual Palestinian Victimhood at the hands of the Jews, now accepted around the world as a poetic truth; one that can’t be dented with facts, logic or reason even though the evidence showing the far greater benefits the Jews brought to the Arab People establishes the relative insignificance of any burden placed on them. To what extent these are prompted by the desinformatsiya we won’t know until the defection of another member of the former Soviet bloc closely associated with the KGB’s successors.
According to Major General Ion Pacepa in his recently published book Disinformation, the dezinformatsiya has not ended its work following Gorbychev. It still remains the largest division of the Russian agency that is the successor of the KGB.
The current violence both in Israel and around the rest of the world is a third wave of Islamic Jihad or Holy War, with the violence in Israel disguised by the Soviets as secular nationalism in a quest for political self determination. As a consequence, Israel is the West’s first line of defense.
Russia is still the enemy of Israel and the United States.
2 Esdras is, in personal opinion, a great book. It is a prophecy about fall of USA and the rise of world mongolic empire (USSR = Greater Khazaria = Talmud’s Brutality etc). I think that Trump is the first of 3 eagle heads, 2 more strong presidents will come, but second will be overthrown by the third and third shall kill herself/himself (sounds a lot like deranged Hillary). After that, USA will drastically weaken and be greatly reduced in size, full of civil war, poverty, famine etc. 2 more weak leaders shall rule its final days, until USA completely burns up, shocking the rest of the word. The reason for this destruction will not be a nuclear war (rest of the world is shocked and in fear), but Yellowstone supervolcanic eruption (not shocking puppet masters of new kabbalistic-talmudic-jewish-khazaric empire, due to advanced technology causing volcaninic eruptions and earthquakes, even now and far in past that technolgoy existed and was used, it is just constantly and greatly upgraded now and will be further upgraded in the future).
Peace be with you.
Dugins friend and Zionist confirms the Palestinian people identity, was a Soviet project;
“Before the sixties no one had heard of the existence of a separate “Palestinian” people. As you know, this successful venture was born in Moscow.”
Eurasianism – rebooted (Jewish) communism.
Rav Mordechai Shriki – Director of the Rahmal Institute (Israel) & leading expert in Kabbalah
Avigdor Eskin – Zionist (Israel).
Pavel Zarifullin – Head of the Intl Eurasian Movement.
I agree here, but DNA studies show that “Palestinians” of the people living there who are NOT settler Jews descend from ancient peoples in Israel, even before Christ. Even if their Palestinian identity was a ruse to create the needed enemy for Jews, it still proves that Palestinians, or the people living in Palestine are stuck square in the middle of a Hegelian dialectic.
If you look closely, Hamas was created by the ZIonist/communist Hegal dialectic.
PLO, Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran etc all controlled opposition working on Belt&Road Initiative alongside Talmudist-Communist China, Talmudist-Communist Russia and Talmudist-Communist-Trotskyite EU. NATO is also a genocidal and robbery-based coalition, with their satanic-bablyonian whore symbolism and behavior enough telling who is their master and originator.
Peace be with you.
Yes, the Soviets funded the Palestinian marxists, many were Christian, not just Muslim.
What about all the Islamic Jihadists funded, armed and trained by the US, UK, Israel and the Saudi’s since 1979, first against the Geriatric Soviet Union, which then continued in the 1990’s after the fall of the Soviet Union against all the slavic people from Serbia and Russia? The entire so-called Global Islamic Terrorist thread was created by Zbigniew Brzezinski in July 1979, six months before the USSR intervened in Afghanistan after the CIA killed the Afghan President.
Modern Russia is not communist, their country was occupied by the Soviet Union.
NO net foreign debt, 2000 tons of gold, 17% income tax, anti-cultural Marxism, far more freedom of speech and media diversity than the “free” west, doesn’t look very communist to me.
Putin eliminated all of Obama’s jihadists in Syria, that’s why they are so pissed off.
not defending ( PLO ) or any Arab leader, we know ( the Arabs ) that they all assigned by the British after WW1 and WW2 and then USA took over, and we know who controls the USA, Europe, Russia and finally China, but removing all right’s of Arabs of their lands and give all the right to Jewish…that even any respected historian wouldn’t dare to say!! even the Jewish them self’s admitted that their was a country and still..called Palestine weather your sorry ass like it or not, i read all the subject and found too much history crap and disinformation , and if you are lying in terms of known history…how could i or anyone else trust the rest..?? see this video this is Gold Meir the prime minster of Israel in the 60th-70th say’s the truth you’r denying it.. https://youtu.be/i0kVgXhU5UI
You do know this is not the editor’s article. You should read the editor’s comments.
Soon there will be no state of Lebanon. Just a group of people associating with various religions scattered in small communities which was once part of Greater Syria. Now disintegrated, a people who had no real economy and a land beneficiary to be colonised by Israel as their was once a great population of jews residing there, to make the land productive and prosperous. The same with Jordan and Syria etc….
Complete BS, yes, the Palestinian movement was a Marxist political organisation, not an Islamic Terrorist organisation.
All radical Islamic Terrorism since 1979 has been armed, trained, and funded by the US, UK, and the Saudi’s beginning with Brzezinski’s arming of the Afghan Jihadists in July 1979. Bush 2 had to appear to attack al-qaeda after 9/11, but when Obama was elected it was again full on starting from Libya and the to Syria. By the way, Brzezinski was a fascist Pole, he wasn’t exactly a fan of Israel.
Modern Russia is not communist, it was never communist, their country was occupied by the Soviet Union. So why did the US keep arming jihadists to attack Russia AFTER the fall of the Soviet Union – wasn’t that the so-called objective?
Putin has done more to eliminate Obama’s jihadists that the decrepit Soviet Politburo ever did.
You, sir, are the one who’s speaking BS! You’re speaking alt-right nonsense! Putin defenders are all the same, ignoring Putin’s remarks that he still is a communist and has lots of things in common with the Democratic Party!
If Russia is communist, so is Australia. If that’s your definition I can’t help you. Does Russia have relations with Israel, so does Australia. You can criticise Israel for a host of reasons, but calling Putin and Russia actual communist is not reality,
It what universe, is saying Russia is capitalist, alt-right?
If you actually know how to use Google Translate what is exactly communist about this:
The biggest problem Russia has is that it allows too much freedom of the press. Twenty-five percent is funded from US and UK government propaganda agencies like USAGM.gov, the old Broadcasting Board of Governors. The fact that most Russians are far better at recognising propaganda than sheep in the west, simply means these outlets have little influence.
Communism is State owned means of production with a command economy,
The form of the electoral system is neither communist or capitalist, it just is.
What you fail to understand is the Communist ideology. There is no real Communist economy, since it has never worked out in practice; “Communist” China is one big example. You really thought I thought Russia had a Communist economy?!! And anyways, you haven’t refuted the point that Putin didn’t renounce his Communist past of the KGB days.
Your definition of communism is the one the communist leaders put out for the naive public. Communism is really despotism. It’s about coming to power:
“The Communist movement is a Trojan horse because it systematically conceals its identity —in its propaganda and organizational tactics.” — Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, The Strategy of Deception: A Study in Worldwide Communist Tactics
Even so, Russia’s 1990s privatization schemes were camouflage for the shuffling of state control to oligarch control and then back to state control. Power did not change at all. Power was simply rebranded. Do you honestly think Gazprom and Rosneft are free enterprise?
Mr. Fitzpatrick, it was same here in Croatia: HDZ (Croatian Democratic Party) came in power presenting themselves as great patriots and believers, and yet they are UDBA’s not stronghold, but castle (UDBA = Yugoslav version of KGB which is percentage wise in killing off population even worse than KGB). All other parties, politicial, financial, power and all other powerful organizations are in their hands. During the Independence War, UDBA liqudated all HOS patriots (like Blaž Kraljević, Ante Paradžik, Miro Barešić, Ludovig Pavlović etc) and placed their agents as great patriots and believers, but its all camouflage for naive goyim-talmudic-whore of babylon slaves. All other parties, like SDP, HSS, HSLS, MOST, Domovinski pokret, even HSP and Živi Zid, are all under their control. Today, Croatia is under greater communist-udba-talmudic-whore of bablyon control than in time of Yugoslavia.
However, there is one key aspect, and I hope that you don’t ban me for this or delete this comment, I live in Croatia and fully well know what is going on: catholic church and vatican are supproting them and are their overlords.
Peace be with you.
Some of those great “patriots” are: Željko Glasnović, Ante Gotovina, Ljubo Ćesić Rojs, Ante Prkačin, Markač, Čermak, Anton Tus, Marko Skejo, Davor Domazet Lošo (supports vatican, and in the same time claims that Israel is our strategic partner, how can you be a strategic partner with someone who considers you an animal), Škoro (known UDBA agent under name of Lunja), Ruža Tomašić (UDBA agent, protected high ranking UDBA official Stipe Mesić), and even Dražen Kelemiec (this guy, either knowingly or unknownigly, is total scam, supports Trump and serves as total controled opposition, they have even saboutaged true patriots who tried to get help from him.)
Peace be with you.
Mr Fitzpatrick: Don’t you think that perhaps there should be some kind of indication here on fitzinfo that this article is posted posthumously? There is something rather distasteful about your comments calling the author a liar when he is no longer able to defend his position. Shame.
Should journalists, dead or alive, not be subject to scrutiny, seeing as they are in public domain? Can you demonstrate that Israel has been the West’s first line of defense?
Nevertheless, worldwide feeling against the Jews continued to mount. A new master stroke of propaganda was needed. The Jews achieved this by their ancient technique of claiming that their opponents were guilty of the very atrocities that the Jews were committing. Founded on terrorism, the State of Israel now became the secret organizer of an “anti-Israel” group, the Palestine Liberation Organization. One Yasser Arafat, whose mother was Jewish, became the head of the greatest Jewish hoax in history. Nevertheless, the PLO was responsible for the survival of Israel, as each attack by the PLO has resulted in renewed worldwide sympathy and support for Israel. Each PLO attack has come just at the moment when the demands that Israel return to its 1948 borders have reached a crescendo, and after the attack the demands against Israel have been hushed. Thousands of young Arabs were persuaded to join the PLO under the delusion that they would strike at the enemy. Instead, they were sent out to be slaughtered. For years, Jewish insiders have joked about the nightly “turkey shoots”, as Israelis leisurely shot down the PLO infiltrators, whose exact route, number and armaments had been radioed to the Jews even before the “terrorists” had left their base. The “turkey shoots” became a popular Israeli sport, and high-ranking officials such as Moshe Dayan took part in picking off the “terrorists”. On one occasion, a very high-ranking State Department official was allowed to pick off his “turkey”, a seventeen-year-old Arab youth.
Protocol 13: “Who will ever suspect all these peoples were stage-managed by us, to a political plan which no one has guessed in the course of centuries?”
The Original ‘Antifa’ Was A Jewish Anti-Nazi Militia
NEO-NAZI UKRAINE: SYNAGOGUE ESTABLISHED FOR ISRAELI VOLUNTEERS (2016)
(Jewish-Soviet sponsored) Palestinian ‘terrorism’, used purposely to legitimise the existence of Israel and as leverage to gain concession of territories.
“In 1999, Patrick ‘Bertie’ Ahern, the leader of the ruling Fianna Fail party, visited Israel and met Binyamin Netanyahu. At a press conference he said Netanyahu had told him that with the Palestinians trying to murder Israelis, Israel SHOULD NOT GIVE UP LAND. Ahern said this position made sense to him.”
1/3 way down
Soviet Defector Ion Pacepa:
“Today’s international terrorism was conceived in the Lubyanka offices of the KGB immediately after the Six Day War, in 1967. As an intelligence general, I witnessed the birth of this child … Then the Israeli victory disgraced the regimes of Syria and Egypt, countries whose clumsily bloated governments were ruled by” advisers It was then that the Kremlin decided to arm the Palestinians hostile to Israel and involve them in a terrorist war against the Jewish state.
General Alexander Sakharovsky, who created the intelligence structures of communist Romania and rose to the level of the head of the entire foreign intelligence service of the USSR, often explained to me: “In today’s world, where nuclear weapons have made the use of military force impossible, terrorism should become our main weapon
The war of terrorism itself was unleashed at the end of 1968, when the KGB first turned the theft of passenger planes into an instrument of terror — the weapon of choice for the events of September 11, 2001 [in New York]. In 1969 alone, 82 aircraft were hijacked worldwide; these acts were committed by the PLO, which was financed by the KGB In 1971, when I visited Sakharovsky in his Lubyanka office, he drew my attention to a sea of red flags attached to the world map hanging on the wall of the office. “The hijacking of planes is my invention,” he boasted.”
section “Terrorism as the main weapon.”
Больше читайте тут: https://gordonua.com/publications/zapiski-byvshego-podpolkovnika-kgb-kto-stoyal-za-podgotovkoy-specsluzhb-k-zahvatu-vlasti-v-rossii-1517059.html
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’was KGB agent – codename Krotov meaning MOLE:
“The appointment of Mahmoud Abbas as prime minister is part of a Zionist plan so he would continue making concessions to the Jews. They want him to negotiate on the remaining 20 percent of Palestine after he voluntarily gave up 80% of the blessed Palestinian land when he signed the Oslo Accords.”.”
In 1937, Auni Bey Abddul Hani – Founder, general secretary and first elected president of the Palestinian Istiqlal (Independence) Party said:
“There is no such country as Palestine. ‘Palestine’ is a term the Zionists invented. . . . Our country was for centuries part of Syria. ‘Palestine’ is alien to us. It is the Zionists who introduced it.”
Arab Historian Admits there is no such thing as a Palestinian People:
IN 1999, Dr Ghazi Hussein, a high representative of the PLO, revealed that YASSER ARAFAT descends from Moroccan Jews & born in Cairo
Soviet-Defector Ion Pacepa
“KGB destroyed the official records of Arafat’s birth in Cairo.”
“Since the Six Day War in 1967, the Lubavitcher Rebbe (Schneerson), has unceasingly expressed his opposition to surrendering any of the LIBERATED territories.”
Yeah I agree that the Palestinians might be a Russian invention to deceive the Arab world, there is no historical evidence for the Palestinian people although some of these Palestinians were also Jews, Russia took the word Palestine from the Zionists.
I however feel stupid for supporting FSA, Western politicians,Putin,Assad and other false opposition because what I realized is that everyone wants war and Muslims keep fleeing to the West.
Why is the world so blind in refusing to see that neither the West nor the East will change things? The Zionists support both sides.