Link doesnt work any longer. Here’s hi broadcast from the day after 9/11: https://odysee.com/@nature_and_race:b/z9VmQPlwNJS447ST:2

There are quite a few have resurfaced from that time where he’s pointing the finger at Zio’s. He’s also gone after Muslims, China, Saudi Arabia.

Strange how these Birchers, of all people, seem to be being directed by the Kremlin

Certainly not the Talmudic Jews, who accuse the Catholics of falsifying the Bible and forbidding their followers to read Catholic Bibles, especially the prophetic books!

And from whom do you think the catholics got their bible?

Pythagorean numerology
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/df/35/53/df355333f889e60fa6b75a1f4dd130dc.jpg

A=1, B=2 . . . I=9
J=1, K=2 . . . R=9
S=1, T=2 . . .

ALEX JONES
A=1
L=3
E=5
X=6
J=1
O=6
N=5
E=5

S=1

33 (((their))) master prime

Albert Pike 33deg fr33mason
Rothschild coat of arms 33

Have you read them in their entirety?

You are evading the issue. The Founding Fathers and the Constitution are on trial here, not the Catholic Church. Regardless of the why, the point is that the United States was founded in reaction to Catholic theocracy in Europe. If you want to entertain your argument here, you have to somehow prove that the Founding Fathers were reacting from a Protestant point of view. But they weren’t, unless you want to admit that Protestant ideals are consistent with masonic ideals. The whole Baconian (Sir Francis Bacon) spirit of the fathers is Protestant, specifically Christian Kabbalist. So, I doubt very much you want to run the risk of inadvertently exposing that, seeing as you are obviously a Protestant sympathizer, if not Protestant yourself. Furthermore, this isn’t only a Catholic issue, as the Jewish-Masonic cryptocracy also targets the Holy Orthodox Church (Russian Revolution as the prime example). It’s more of a conspiracy against Orthodoxy as a whole, which includes the Catholic Church. Therefore, you can’t reduce this complex debate to simply being Catholic vs. Protestant. Back to the issue of the founding fathers, evidently you still cannot understand the spirit behind libertarianism and, consequently, the dubious U.S. Constitution. Reverting to old grudges isn’t bringing you any clarity.

>>>If you call yourself a Christian, then State Religion is the best possible form of government.
Actually, you seem to overlook the fact, that Catholicism as a POLITICAL Entity across Europe, forbade the reading of Bibles in vulgar tongues, and tried to keep the word of God away from the peoples themselves, until it was forced in a reactionary fashion to publish an English Translation (Douay Rheims), as people could see that the PriestCraft was all Catholicism had to offer.
The 9 Supreme Court Judges in the US used to be exclusively Protestant, and conservative Christian values reigned in the US. Have you checked it lately? Over the last few decades? 3 Jews and 6 Catholics. The Jews are all Liberal and anti-Christian (even anti-Judaic in regards to the 10 Commandments), and the Catholics on the court are becoming more liberal than a Bacchanalia.
Why is it that there are never Protestants appointed by the Reps or Dems when their Puppet sits in the White House, and only Jews and Catholics? Plenty of Catholics in Freemasonry nowadays I can tell you. P2 is just one example of the City of London-Milan-IOR Vatican collusion.
State Religion must be instated by JESUS himself after the eschaton, but any who attempt this before hand are anti-Christ. You have it the wrong way around. The Vatican is a den of pedophiles and bearer bond traffickers, proving;
1Co 2:5 That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.
Priest Craft is reprehensible to Christ, as we were all created Kings and Priests.
I need no Priest Craft between me and the Word, and any State that forces it is no better than the Pharasaical tyranny the Jews were under in 33AD, because they then force their interpretations and have power over categorizing ‘heresy’ … a bit like being labelled a ‘terrorist’ by the Political State, with your human rights removed. I know history too well.
The Pope is selling carbon Derivatives and Credits for the City of London to empower the United Nations my friend;
Carbon is an atomic trinity and #6 on the Periodic Table, containing;
-6 Protons
-6 Neutrons
-6 Electrons
…666 … to be attached to individual ID#’s and to assess Carbon Footprints to put The Beast in total control of human life, and Pope Francis is the False Prophet selling this new system.
Rev 18:4 And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.
Is ‘she’ the Freemasonic System behind America and Britain, or is the Vatican included in this Harlot also? I say to hell with the Vatican AND the Freemasons, (literally to hell) but the Constitution can remain as a check and balance until Shiloh come.

Again, don’t let the Constitution’s language fool you. They also refer to God in other masonic texts—should we then believe that masons are really Christians trying to break out? The stripping away of theocracy from the American ideal had nothing to do with one simply seeing a better way. It was a direct attack on the Catholic Church. The freemasons, and their Jewish orchestrators, feared a spread of Catholicism, even though they had dealt it a major blow in France. You, like many other Americans, seem to romanticize the intentions of the U.S. Founding Fathers. But the intentions are quite obvious. There was to be no Catholic rule in America. At this time, Jewish messianism was devolving to new depths, and libertarianism became the avant garde, the continuation of this devolution. The U.S. founding fathers received this knowledge from their spirit guides (demons), as is well documented (see the accounts of Francis Bacon, John Dee, George Washington, etc.) And what about Jefferson and his Hellfire’s Club? Looks like the fathers all took the path of Doctor Faustus.
If you call yourself a Christian, then State Religion is the best possible form of government—something the founding fathers voraciously fought. Alex Jones is a word magician and nothing he says can be taken at face value. He perversely blends Christianity with libertarianism, as if the two have any associations, but it’s all pandering to a segment of his audience. There are several Youtube clips of he advocating deism with the likes of David Icke and Jordan Maxwell. This also lines up with suspicion that he is a freemason. The US Constitution, being in the spirit of AntiChrist, was designed to fail God’s creation. As the Protocols of Zion admit,

The constitution scales of these days will shortly break down, for we have established them with a certain lack of accurate balance in order that they may oscillate incessantly until they wear through the pivot on which they turn. The goyim are under the impression that they have welded them sufficiently strong and they have all along kept on expecting that the scales would come into equilibrium. But the pivots – the kings on their thrones – are hemmed in by their representatives, who play the fool, distraught with their own uncontrolled and irresponsible power. This power they owe to the terror which has been breathed into the palaces. As they have no means of getting at their people, into their very midst, the kings on their thrones are no longer able to come to terms with them and so strengthen themselves against seekers after power. We have made a gulf between the far-seeing Sovereign Power and the blind force of the people so that both have lost all meaning, for like the blind man and his stick, both are powerless apart. (Protocol 3:1, 19th Century)

It is merely wishful thinking that the U.S. Constitution is compatible with Christianity or was spawned from Christian beliefs. You say “it’s all in the eye of the beholder,” which is a Judeo-subjectivist concept. There is absolutely no doubt that the U.S. Constitution is a masonic document. Despite the intentions of Pope Leo III’s condemnation of masonic Americanism, Testem benevolentiae nostrae remains truth.

So, I’m not disagreeing with your summation of Liberty when it is wielded against the Sovereignty of God over Man, I agree with you completely.
BUT, here’s where the interpretation gets subjective to the reader him/herself … the term Natural Law.
Pantheism, or a personalized Creator?
I know many of the founders were deists (due to their Masonic and Enlightenment paradigm), but many of the founders in their personal commentaries on the foundation of American Law, clearly state that Natural Law is from God (the God of the Bible). Also, there were many trinitarian Masons at that time, many of whom interpreted Masonic doctrine through an exclusively Christian lens, with the ‘all religions’ phrase being present only because of Christian Denominational wars in Europe that they declared had no place taking place in the Lodge.
I believe their quarms with directly mentioning God in the document itself, stem from their want to break away from not just a King, but also an Organized Church body (theocracy: Pope, or Monarch claiming to be the Head of a National Church). Christianity is a one-to-one relationship IMO between God and Man, so I don’t expect the foundation of a Political Entity to express an outright spiritual foundation, as long as it is clear that Christian rights are protected … as the Founders made quite clear. IF other religions were to be omitted by this Political entity, then it would also become a Spiritual body as soon as it discriminated, and as Jesus let Pilate know, ‘God’ gave Pilate ‘his authority’, even though he was a worshiper of Pagan State Deity. Pilate then knew Jesus was innocent of offense against Roman temporal powers, and had to find a way that the Jews did their judgement by themselves, as Jews were bound under Jewish Spiritual practice, and not Roman State Religion. There is no problem what so ever in the USA, as long as the US Govt does not adopt a State Religion or discriminate against Christians (which is the same thing) … which of course is now happening 200+ years after founding.
It’s all in the interpretation of the document, and the eye of the beholder at the end of the day, as explained in this piece:
http://www.timesrecordnews.com/lifestyle/just-where-does-the-constitution-mention-god
When it comes to the definition of Marriage between a man and a man, and a woman and a woman (or perhaps the qty of people involved will now not need to be two?), perhaps the term Natural Law has been violated, and become so anachronistic as to render the Constitution a liquid document to justify a Babylonian ‘Do As Thou Wilt’ society?
It’s all still in the eye of the beholder, and Alex Jones makes clear his PERSONAL allegiance to the Christian interpretation of God does he not?